Neo-Traditional Overlay Application

Similar documents
APPLICATION FOR REZONING PROPERTY CITY OF HOLLAND, MICHIGAN. Name of Applicant. Address, and Phone # of Applicant

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN)

2. Would the proposed project comply with the Land Use map? 3. Would the proposed project require a rezoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning district?

CITY OF ZEELAND PLANNING COMMISSION

CITY OF KEIZER MASTER PLAN APPLICATION & INFORMATION SHEET

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 2010 Legislative Session. Council Members Dernoga and Olson

Plat Requirements CHECKLIST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW

City of Reedley Community Development Department 1733 Ninth Street Reedley, CA (559) FAX

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Kalama has many areas of timberland and open areas inside its City limits adjacent to residential areas;

2. Would the proposed project comply with the Land Use map? 3. Would the proposed project require a rezoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning district?

5. Would the proposed project require modifications to the existing regulations?

TOWNSHIP OF LOGAN SOIL & FILL IMPORTATION AND PLACEMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

Applicant Name Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code . Property Owner Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

Project phasing plan (if applicable) 12 copies of site plan

City of Fort Lupton Administrative Site Plan Process

ARTICLE 3. LARGE-SCALE SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC INSTALLATIONS SECTION XXI

Checklists. Project Name: Location: File Number: Date of Submittal: Reviewer: Date: Applicant: Contact Name: Phone Number:

Huntington Stormwater Utility

ARTICLE V PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF PLANNING AND ZONING - DEVELOPMENT DIVISION. Final Plan Submittal Application Requirements.

Appendix I. Checklists

Net Land Area (NLA): Area within zoning lot boundaries NLA= sq. ft. a) Credited Street Area (total adjacent frontage) x ½ width of public rightof-way

GENERAL INFORMATIONaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

MEDWAY PLANNING BOARD MINOR SITE PLAN PROJECTS Application Guidelines

CHAPTER SPECIAL PURPOSE AND OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS

ZONING COMPLIANCE PERMIT APPLICATION

CITY OF CYPRESS 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California (714) DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PERMIT PROCESS

CHESAPEAKE LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE

Essential Skills: Reading and Interpreting Maps and Plans

Application for Site Plan Review

Sanford/Lee County Technical Review Committee (TRC) DEADLINES & MEETING DATES

APPLICATION FOR MINOR SITE PLAN REVIEW

APPLICATION FORM SITE PLAN REVIEW REGULATIONS TOWN OF CONWAY, NH

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

TREE REMOVAL PERMIT PACKET

Clarksburg Square Road Extension

ARTICLE 17 SITE PLAN REVIEW

PRELIMINARY CONDITIONAL USE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS

SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST

CONSENT CALENDAR CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM NO: A.1, A.2 STAFF: LARRY LARSEN

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF PLANNING AND ZONING - DEVELOPMENT DIVISION. Site Development Plan Submittal Application Requirements

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF PLANNING AND ZONING - DEVELOPMENT DIVISION FINAL PLAN - SUBMITTAL APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS.

ARTICLE 9: LANDSCAPING AND FENCING REQUIREMENTS

SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements

STAFF REPORT INTRODUCTION

Major Subdivision Sketch Plan Checklist

Town of West Point Plan of Development

R E S O L U T I O N. Designation: R-2A (1-Family, 2-acre Minimum Lot Size)

4. To assure that adequate screening and buffering will be provided between the planned project and contiguous properties;

Design Review Application *Please call prior to submittal meeting to determine applicable fees*

Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Conservation Plan

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: C STAFF: ROBERT TEGLER FILE NO: CPC PUD QUASI-JUDICIAL

ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE ZONED UNINCORPORATED AREAS ARTICLE 1150 OF PUTNAM COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA Page 95 ARTICLE 1150 SITE PLAN REVIEW

The Development Review Process. Presentation to the GSSC IAC

R E S O L U T I O N. Single-Family Residence/ Church. 2,488 sq. ft. 2,488 sq. ft. Area Parking Required: Church

Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan

Site Development Plan (SDP) Checklist

C-I-10. The effect of establishing a comprehensive site review as follows will: B. Reduce the cluttered aspects of current development by:

Town of Windham. Planning Department 8 School Road Windham, ME voice fax

PART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY. The application is Attachment A. The site plan is Attachment B.

REZONING APPLICATION MPD SUPPLEMENT

APPLICATION FOR MINOR SITE PLAN REVIEW

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan directs that master plans be developed for each proposed urban village (FLU-18), and

SPECIFIC DESIGN PLAN

SECTION UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE SECTION Part 1 Ordinance. ARTICLE 1 Zoning Districts

EXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS

PART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY. Proposed Land Use: 120 single-family lots. The application is Attachment A. The site plan is Attachment B.

CONCEPT PLAN APPLICATION

SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS

Net Land Area (NLA): Area within zoning lot boundaries NLA= 1,076,181 sq. ft.

PRELIMINARY PLAT DESIGN REQUIREMENTS Updated 4/8/2016

COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION

DRIVEWAY LOCATION APPROVAL RULES AND REGULATIONS

LONDONDERRY PLANNING BOARD MINOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION & CHECKLIST

Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Application Form & Checklist

PRELIMINARY PROJECT REVIEW PROCESS

City of Mt. Juliet Planning & Zoning Department. Site Plan Checklist. Site plan cklist v1.18

ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 404 MASTER PLANNING

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division

D1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE TO ADD A NEW SECTION 4.N. IN THE ZONING CODE FOR THE TOWN OF MIDDLETOWN, RELATING TO MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT

Site Plan Review Residential Accessory Building

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: FINAL PLAN REVIEW- PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP)

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Preliminary Sediment & Stormwater Management Plan Review Checklist DATE RECEIVED: PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME:

A Guide to Open Space Design Development in Halifax Regional Municipality

ARTICLE VI: SITE PLAN REVIEW

Staff Report. Conditional Use PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEMS: 11, 12, 13 STAFF: RYAN TEFERTILLER

SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION

Incentive Zoning Regulations Florida Municipal City of Orlando

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division

R E S O L U T I O N. 2. Development Data Summary:

Highway Oriented Commercial Development Criteria

LEVEL TWO UNIFIED PERMIT CHECKLIST FOR DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS [Devens Enterprise Commission Rules and Regulations 2018]

THE CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA

1. Request: The subject application is for approval of a gymnasium addition to an existing private school and church.

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017

MIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT

Transcription:

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF LAUREL DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 8103 Sandy Spring Road Laurel, Maryland 20707 (301) 725-5300 Internet Address http://www.cityoflaurel.org E-mail: ecd@laurel.md.us Application No. Date Filed PC Meeting Recommendation M&CC Mtg. Decision Ordinance No. Planner Assigned Zoning Sign Issued Neo-Traditional Overlay Application APPLICATION MUST BE FILLED OUT IN ITS ENTIRETY. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNLESS ALL ITEMS IN THE CHECKLISTS ARE ADDRESSED.* COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL *Check all that apply. AMENDED PRELIMINARY FINAL 1. SUBJECT PROPERTY Project Name Street Address Zoning Lot No. Block Subdivision Name Tax Identification Number/s 2. APPLICANT Name Street Address Suite No. City State Zip Code Telephones: Work Home E-Mail Address: 3. PROPERTY OWNER Name Street Address Suite No. City State Zip Code Telephones: Work Home 4. ENGINEER/SURVEYOR Name Street Address Suite No. City State Zip Code Telephone: Work

5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION NARRATIVE 6. NEO-TRADITIONAL OVERLAY CHECKLIST The following items MUST be included on the Site and Landscape Plan (Section 20-2.2 Unified Land Development Code (ULDC). *Check off each item in Applicant Column as it applies to the Plan. If not applicable, please explain why in detail* A. Title of drawing, including name and address of applicant and person responsible for preparation of such drawing, and site location map. B. North arrow, scale (1"=30'), date. C. Topography of the site (Minimum five (5) foot contours). D. Slopes of fifteen (15) percent or greater. E. Land within 100-year flood plain. Submitted/S hown Applicant Staff Use

6. NEO-TRADITIONAL OVERLAY CHECKLIST F. Signature Blocks for final plans. 1. City of Laurel Planning Commission Approved: Date 2. Chairman Secretary DATE RECEIVED BY DPW: DATE RETURNED TO ECD: DPW REVIEWER: DATE: DPW DIRECTOR (OR DESIGNEE): DATE: APPROVED: APPROVED W/COMMENTS: REVIEWED: REJECTED: G. EXISTING Site Conditions. Locate ALL:* 1. Structures with existing setbacks. 2. All parking and truck loading areas, showing access and egress. 3. Location and type of all recreational facilities. 4. Outdoor storage, if any. 5. All existing drains, culverts, retaining walls and fences. 6. Location and species of all landscaping. 7. Public water facilities. 8. Fire and other emergency zones, including the location of fire hydrants. * All existing structures and physical features to be removed are to be shown as such. H. PROPOSED Site Conditions. (Locate all proposed): 1. All structures with setbacks. Exterior elevations of all proposed structures showing the height. 2. Explanation of use of the proposed structure. 3. Location of all parking and truck loading areas, showing access and egress. 4. Outdoor storage, if any. 5. Provision for pedestrian access. 6. Location, height, and style of all refuse enclosures. 7. Location, design and construction materials of all proposed site improvements, including drains, culverts, retaining walls and fences. 8. Fire and other emergency zones, including the location of fire hydrants. I. A computation of the parking requirements and spaces to be provided (See Design Standards below). J. A computation of the total area of the lot; the building floor area for each type of proposed use; the building coverage and greenspace.

6. NEO-TRADITIONAL OVERLAY CHECKLIST K. Location and identification of uses, access points, zoning and other similar information on the properties, lots, tracts, or parcels adjacent and adjoining the Project area. L. Location, size and design and construction materials of all proposed signs. M. Location and proposed development of all buffer areas, including existing vegetative cover. N. General landscaping plan and planting schedule. O. Location, design and type of all lighting facilities. P. Location, size and type of all stormwater management facilities. Q. Legend explaining all symbols used. R General notes area. S. Revisions box. T. Appropriate fees submitted with the application. (See Fee Schedule) Additional Regulations A. Parking Area Design Standards 1. Measurement Units must follow Sec. 20-16.3 of the ULDC. 2. Schedule of Parking Requirements, by use, must follow Sec. 20-16.5 of the ULDC. 3. Required landscaping for parking lots must follow Sec. 20-16.4(d) of the ULDC. 4. Total number of handicap parking spaces shall be in accordance with Sec. 20-16.4(e) of the ULDC. B. Landscaping Regulations: 1. All landscaping must be in accordance with the Article I Division 15 of the ULDC. C. Forest Conservation: Must be in accordance with Article V of the ULDC. 1. Disturbance greater than 40,000 square feet requires the followinga. Forest Stand Delineation (FSD) b. Forest Conservation Plan (FCP) Submission Requirements: 1. Completed application and applicable fee submissions. 2. 30 sets of plans are required (24 x 36 only). Plans must be folded to 8.5 x 11. 3. 30 copies of application and Statement of Justification. 4. Electronic copy of Site & Landscape Plan on CD (AutoCAD Format). 5. Two (2) mylar originals for final approval signatures. a. b.

Once all of the Final Site and Landscape Plans are approved by the Planning Commission, the applicant may be required to submit the following plans and file for applicable permits with the Department of Economic and Community Development in order to begin construction: Sediment and Erosion Control Plans Storm Water Management Plans Grading Plans Building Plans I DO SOLEMNLY DECLARE AND AFFIRM UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE CONTENTS OF THIS APPLICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. APPLICANT: Signature: Date: Print Name PROPERTY OWNER (if different than applicant) Signature: Date: Print Name: Fees (see separate schedule) Amount Account # Date Paid Initial Filing Fee 10-43105 Zoning Sign $30 each X signs = $ 10-43105 Legal Advertisement Deposit $250.00 10-20203 Transcript Deposit $250.00 10-20203 Fee-in-lieu of open space (Residential only) Total: FOR STAFF USE ONLY Other Zoning Application(s): (i.e. Variances/Special Exceptions, Special Approvals) Proposed Required Previous Application(s): Approved/Denied

Referred to the City of Laurel Police Department Referred to the City of Laurel Department of Public Works Referred to the City of Laurel Department of Parks and Recreation Referred to City of Laurel Office of the Fire Marshal Referred to Laurel Volunteer Fire Department Referred to Laurel Volunteer Rescue Squad _ Referrals to Other Agencies: See Overlay Application Agency Notification List A referral to has been made. Staff Comments: STAFF REVIEW O = Omission noted C = Applicable information included in application N/A = Not Applicable

Sec. 20-6.12. - Neo-Traditional Overlay areas. (a) Purpose and intent. It shall be the purpose and intent of Neo-Traditional Overlay areas (N-TO) to be an alternative form of development designed to: (1) Create additional development opportunities for creativity and siting of neighborhood design, which emulates certain aspects of traditional towns and neighborhoods by a site and landscape development plan reviewed and approved similarly to the process of a map amendment. (2) Enhance present and future neighborhoods within the City of Laurel, and to allow the provision of various housing opportunities, which are typified by reduced front lawns with the majority of parking provided for out of sight in rear alleys and service areas. (3) Creates residential environments typified by tree-lined streets, houses with front porches, and traditional town/row houses with specific architectural details emulating their historic counterparts. (4) Fences and walls shall be included in a comprehensive design plan, as well as signs, directional signs, and lighting fixtures proposed in conjunction with the proposal. (5) Allow for increased, consolidated, or comprehensively designed plans for neo-traditional proposals, which shall provide for the various design aspects of dwellings and amenities planned for the development. (6) Circulation through a neo-traditional development shall include a complete sidewalk system, which connects all aspects of the proposed area, including access to public spaces and recreational amenities. (7) The conditions and restrictions of such an overlay are considered an optional form of development, which is in addition to the land uses and restrictions contained within the base zoning of the R-55 Zoning District, or other districts that may be designated by the Mayor and City Council in the future. (8) Acknowledge that the development and approval of any Neo-Traditional Overlay Zone is unique and specific to a unique parcel or groups of parcels that is conditioned upon meeting the objectives and specific goals of using such an overlay option. (9) Increase the attractiveness of the City for the potential of the development, stabilization, and improvement of its neighborhoods by increasing home ownership opportunities. (10) The Mayor and City Council is not obligated to approve any form of optional development if it concludes that the proposal does not meet with the purpose and intent of these regulations. Approvals within any overlay do not usurp or diminish the jurisdiction of the City's Historic District Commission, if the overlay is located within their jurisdiction. Uses provided for within the City's R-55 zoning category for other than residential uses may be declined for consideration within a proposal for the neo-traditional option. (11) Setbacks, of any type, will not be waived, modified, or amended unless alternate methods will provide equal or superior protection to surrounding uses. (12) To conclude that the use of this overlay option does not diminish, modify, or in any way alter the applicant's right to development their property using the conventional base zone affixed to the property. (13) Neo-traditional overlay areas may be included for consideration within or an element of certain revitalization overlay areas, such as the RO-4, Revitalization Overlay for existing multifamily and attached housing areas, and the RO-6, the Patient River revitalization and M-X-T -- Mixed Use -- Transportation Oriented zone option. (b) Types and location of Neo-Traditional Overlay Areas. (1) Neo-Traditional Overlay Areas may be considered in areas currently zoned for R-55 residential uses. (2) They may also be also be included as an option or element of proposals with the RO-4 and RO-6 Revitalization Overlay areas, as provided for in the article. (3) Neo-traditional overlay areas must contain a minimum of five (5) acres for consideration. (4) Placement that involves consolidation of existing properties that result in demolition within the jurisdiction of the City's Historic District Commission is specifically discouraged, except in possible locations within the RO-6, and M-X-T -- Mixed Use -- Transportation Oriented zone option. (c) Development standards for all neo-traditional overlay areas. (1) It shall be the intent of all overlay options that the purpose and intent be met before this optional form of development can be approved. Provisions of additional amenities or the modification of certain development standards shall be based on the conclusion of the Mayor and City Council by this article, that the proposed development sufficiently meets the intent of this option. The following elements contained

within conventional residential/commercial/industrial development regulations for modification, among others, may be considered: Building height. Density or intensity (with a maximum level of eight (8) units per acre if proposed within an R-55 Zone). More density is possible if this option is proposed in conjunction within or an element of revitalization overlay area where the base density of properties is higher than the R-55 Zone. Lot size and coverage or other area regulations. Landscaping, tree preservation, or preservation of natural area. Screening, fencing, berms, or other features intended for noise attenuation or visual impact. Traffic circulations, traffic generation, site design, refuse disposal areas and utility structures. Adequate public facilities. Waivers or modifications cannot be granted for street and alley widths, as currently provided for in this chapter for reasons of public safety, and access of public services. (2) The provision of amenities and other factors which are deemed to exceed conventional development may include, but not be limited to the following: Architectural design and details or proposed buildings and parking structures. Building materials. Innovative designs for mixed residential complexes. Under grounding of utilities on site and in the adjacent public right-of-way. Public or scenic spaces, including plazas, fountains or water features and public sculpture or murals, including neighborhood parks and the siting of building oriented to these features. Upscale attached or detached housing. Provision for transit facilities, such as bus shelters which are designed to be integrated with neighborhood amenities. Enhanced landscaping features which promotes the intent of neo-traditional development. (d) Process for the consideration of a development proposal within any Revitalization Overlay area or M-X-T Zone. (1) Applicants submitting a proposal for development utilizing the Neo-Traditional Overlay shall submit a plan in accordance with the City Zoning Regulations for Site and Landscape Plans. In addition, the plan(s) shall contain the following: A traffic and circulation plan. Plan for re-subdivision (for consolidations). A specific plan for the uses and their design. A phasing schedule, if a multi-phase development is planned. Other studies or plans deemed necessary by the Department of Community Planning and Business Services, as recommended to the Planning Commission. (2) After review of a completed application or proposal, the Department of Community Planning and Business Services shall prepare a technical staff report, analyzing the compliance of the applicant's proposal with the intent and purpose of utilizing Neo-Traditional Overlay areas. The report shall be transmitted to the Planning Commission, who shall hold a public hearing for recommendation to the Mayor and City Council. The requirements for notifying the public of such proposals, including sign posting, shall be the same as that required by the City Zoning Regulations for Zoning map amendment applications. (3) Upon receipt of the recommendation of the Planning Commission and staff technical report, the Mayor and City Council shall schedule a review of the proposal and schedule two (2) public hearings on such proposal, including a specific notification to Prince George's County, the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, if included within an annexation area annexed within five (5) calendar years, and the Maryland Department of State Planning in all cases. After the second public hearing, the Mayor and City Council may approve, reject, or modify the development request for the Neo-Traditional Overlay option.

(e) Neo-Traditional Overlay Area map. The placement, location, and distinction of all overlay zones shall in accordance with the location of these areas within as approved by the Mayor and City Council within the R-55 Zoning District, containing a minimum of five (5) acres, or by inclusion within a specific proposal for revitalization overlay area, as stated herein. (Revised 01/6/2017)