Managing Nematodes in Vineyards

Similar documents
How to Choose Rootstocks for Foothill Vineyards, and Why Phylloxera Matter

Rootstock Research for Current and Future Options

Breeding Salt and Drought Tolerant Rootstocks. Andy Walker

Using and Breeding Drought Tolerant Grape Rootstocks. Andy Walker

Dr. Carmo Vasconcelos Oregon State University

Horticulture Department

Nematicides delivered: 1/via resistant rootstocks 2/foliar-applied systemics. Michael McKenry, UC Riverside / Kearney

Viticulture - Characteristics of the vine - Rootstocks & Grafting

History of rootstocks in South Africa (Part 2)

Resistance of Grape Rootstocks to Plant-parasitic Nematodes

Practical advice for choosing rootstocks. Introduction

Rootstocks for Planting or Replanting New York Vineyards

History of rootstocks in South Africa (Part 3)

Rootstock Selection and Management

Inovace studijních programů AF a ZF MENDELU směřující k vytvoření mezioborové integrace CZ.1.07/2.2.00/

Rootstocks and Vine Performance

Classical and Molecular Breeding for Resistance to Grape Pests & Diseases. Breeding / Genetics Projects

Preplant Considerations for New Vineyards

California Seed & Plant Lab., Inc Pleasant Grove Rd, Elverta CA Phone: (916) Fax: (916)

Replanting Walnut without Soil Fumigation: Is this Possible?

Project Title: Development of next generation rootstocks for California vineyards.

Nematodes in Western Australian. Vineyards. Bulletin 4667 ISSN

Cling Peach ANNUAL REPORT 2006 EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR TOLERANCE TO BACTERIAL CANKER AND ORCHARD REPLANT CONDITIONS.

By R.L. Perry and P. Sabbatini Michigan State University Department of Horticulture E3298

DRY FARMING. Martha Stoumen notes for discussion on 6/22/17

Self-Study Course. Continuing Education. Vineyard nutrient needs vary with rootstocks and soils. Nutrient availability and uptake

Harmonizing Grapevine Nursery Stock Certification Programs in the Pacific Northwest

CHIP BUD GRAFTING IN WASHINGTON STATE VINEYARDS

Establishing new trees possible impacts of rootstock propagation method on young tree growth Ute Albrecht

Citrus and Avocado Nematodes Spread by nursery stock, by contaminated implements, and by water from irrigation canals that may drain infested land

A REPORT TO THE CALIFORNIA TREE FRUIT AGREEMENT

Grape Rootstocks for Southwest Texas

Pistachio rootstocks. Elizabeth J. Fichtner Farm Advisor: nuts, prunes, olives UCCE Tulare and Kings Counties

Bacterial Canker Susceptibility of Peach:Almond Hybrid Rootstocks for California Stonefruit Orchards

Clean planting material - an effective strategy to prevent diseases in grape vines

Project Title: Development of next generation rootstocks for California vineyards.

Pear Rootstocks. How many trees would I plant? ± 3,000 per ha. What I believe growers need to be doing to be successful in the Year 2012.

University of California Cooperative Extension Tulare County. Grape Notes. DELAYED GROWTH PREVALENT IN VINEYARDS THIS SPRING Bill Peacock

Vine Lines Fresno County

Apple Rootstock Trials in British Columbia, Canada

Tolerance of almond rootstocks to root-knot nematodes Peter Clingeleffer, Norma Morales & Brady Smith (deceased March 2013)

Vineyard Irrigation with a Limited Supply of Water. Glenn McGourty UCCE Mendocino and Lake Counties

Nematodes of Backyard Deciduous Fruit Crops in Florida 1

Corn Nematode Sampling Guidelines from United Soils

Dr. Danielle Hirkala BC Tree Fruits Cooperative

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Research Service Washington, D.C

Phylloxera Strategies for management in Oregon's vineyards

Vineyard Establishment (vine training, trellis, planting, early vine training, nutrition, & canopy management)

Resilience of Sultana (Vitis Vinfera) to Drought and Subsequent Recovery: Field Evaluation of Nine Rootstock Scion Combinations

Sweet Cherry Rootstock Traits Lynn E. Long, Oregon State University

Wine Grape Training Systems Dr. Duke Elsner Small Fruit Educator Michigan State University Extension Traverse City, Michigan

CLONAL PROPAGATION OF WALNUT ROOTSTOCK GENOTYPES FOR GENETIC IMPROVEMENT

Innovative Rootstocks for Apple crop. Nicola Dallabetta FEM (Italy) Australia November 2017

Grape Pests and IPM Practices for Cold Climate Vineyards. NENY & VT Grape School Anna Wallis Cornell Cooperative Extension

East Malling Rootstock Club. Felicidad Fernández AHDB Tree Fruit Day 22 Feb 2018

What to Consider: Almond Rootstocks. December 6, 2016

Article 5. Registration and Certification of Grapevines Effective July 1, 2010

Screening and Evaluation of New Rootstocks with Resistance to Phytophthora cinnamomi

New Orchard Development: Site Evaluation through Planting. David Doll Farm Advisor UCCE Merced County

FRUIT CROP PEST UPDATES. Dr. Elina Coneva ACES, Auburn University

Garlic Production IDEA-NEW

Vinews Viticulture Information News, Week of 11 June 2018 Columbia, MO

Response of Cucurbit Rootstocks for Grafted Melon to Root-knot

agriculture, thus it is critical that you do your homework.

UPDATE ON CHERRY ROOTSTOCKS

Juneberry Currants Gooseberry. Strawberry Raspberry Blueberry Cranberry Lingonberry. Well drained loamy soils High organic matter

Using Liquid Sources of Potassium Fertilizer in Highbush Blueberry. David Bryla USDA-ARS Horticultural Crops Research Unit Corvallis, OR

Pinto Peanut. A legume for use in pastures, soil improvement and conservation, and as cover crop in fruit crops

California Cling Peach Board ANNUAL REPORT-2010 IMPROVED ROOTSTOCKS FOR PEACH AND NECTARINE. Ted DeJong, Professor, University of California, Davis.

The influence of different cherry rootstocks on sweet cherry properties

Development of nematode/rootstock profiles for 40 rootstocks with the potential to be an alternative to Nemaguard

5 Rootstocks. Choosing a Rootstock. General Notes on Rootstock Descriptions. Mikeal L. Roose

Evaluation and Demonstration of New Stone Fruit Systems

8/23/2013. Grape Cultivars for West-Central Missouri Vineyard Terminology Trellis Systems The Cordon Budget Canopy Management Techniques

Managing Orchard Salinity During and After Drought. December 9, 2015

Resistance of Grapevine Rootstocks to Meloidogyne incognita under Field Conditions!

Evaluation of grafting for the mature green tomato production system

Alpine Russet Management Recommendations Idaho

Shoot Positioning Native American (Concord-type) Grapevines

FACTORS TO CONSIDER IN ESTABLISHING A VINEYARD ROBERT E. PLAISTER. U.C. Farm Advisor in Amador County

Alternatives to Rootstock Propagation by Seed What can we expect?

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching this

Training Systems for New York Vineyards

GROWTH AND PERFORMANCE OF OWN-ROOTED CHANDLER AND VINA COMPARED TO PARADOX ROOTED TREES

Young Vine Care Dormancy Preparation

Final Report for Slosson Foundation. Trap Cropping for Management of Root-knot Nematode in Home Gardens

Integrated Pest Management in the Garden and Landscape

INTRODUCTION OF GRAFTING AS A NEW IPM TOOL IN ARIZONA MELON PRODUCTION

Grafting of Tomatoes for Soil-based Production in Greenhouse and High Tunnels Judson Reid, Kathryn Klotzbach and Nelson Hoover

STONE FRUIT ROOTSTOCKS

Variety selection is important to minimize disease incidence and severity

Dried Plum News Tulare County

PROPAGATION AND RETESTING OF WALNUT ROOTSTOCK GENOTYPES PUTATIVELY RESISTANT TO PESTS AND DISEASES

Fundamentals of Vine Management (vine training, trellis, planting, early vine training, nutrition, canopy management & crop management)

Successfully Managing a vineyard in the Southeast.

2016 World Crops Research Update - Okra and Eggplant

Vine Nutrition. A g e n d a 4/10/2017. Soil How to sample Sample submission sheet Lab analysis & results Interpretation

Managing Soil Borne Diseases

Selecting Burley Tobacco Varieties

Bacterial Wilt and Bacterial Leaf Scorch on Blueberry in Florida. Deanna Bayo Ph.D. Student Phil Harmon, Ph.D. UF/IFAS Plant Pathology Department

Transcription:

Managing Nematodes in Vineyards Andy Walker awalker@ucdavis.edu

Thanks! CA Grape Rootstock Improvement Commission / CA Grape Rootstock Research Foundation CDFA NT, FT, GV Improvement Advisory Board American Vineyard Foundation CA Table Grape Commission Louis P. Martini Endowed Chair in Viticulture E&J Gallo Winery

Why Worry About Nematodes? Serious replant consideration Loss of nematicides and fumigants Evolution of aggressive nematode strains Specific resistance in current rootstocks Unable to rotate vineyards - although can and should rotate rootstock use Spread on root systems and equipment http://plpnemweb.ucdavis.edu/nemaplex

Nematode effects on grapes Abnormal cell growth that results in characteristic swellings - galls. Disruption of the vascular tissue altering the translocation of water and nutrients to the shoots - desiccation, K and other deficiencies. Cracked galls and roots leads to root decay and loss. Vectoring of viruses - grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV).

Meloidogyne spp. (arenaria, incognita, javanica, chitwoodi, and??) root-knot nematodes

Tylenchulus semipenetrans citrus nematode

(sensu lato) Xiphinema americanum dagger nematode

Criconemoides xenoplax ring nematode - +

Pratylenchus vulnus root lesion nematode

Xiphinema index dagger nematode

Fanleaf Degeneration Disease complex caused by GFLV and vectored by the dagger nematode, Xiphinema index One rootstock alternative exists - O39-16 - rotundifolia is the key Phylloxera, root-knot nematode and excessive vigor concerns. 89 Series and others in testing, but

Nematode/Grape Interactions Nematodes are spread with agriculture - soil movement, distribution of plant materials. Native vegetation sites are unlikely to harbor grape damaging nematodes. Sites previously in agriculture are more likely to harbor grape damaging nematodes. Fallow from annual agriculture can be short (roots die quickly) long term fallow needed when following trees or vines (very long lived roots). Nematodes encyst and likely to persist longer than expected.

60 days in the bag

Nematode/Grape Interactions Root-knot, lesion, and citrus nematodes are primarily found in coarse textured soils, but lots of exceptions. Association with agriculture is key factor. Ring and X. americanum on many soils. Xiphinema index was distributed to, and does well in, many soils. Fanleaf seems less severe in hot climates.

California Grapes: Co-distribution of Nematodes Northern Interior/Foothills Criconemoides xenoplax Pratylenchus vulnus North Coast Xiphinema index Criconemoides xenoplax Pratylenchus vulnus Central Coast Meloidogyne spp. Xiphinema index Criconemoides xenoplax Central Interior Meloidogyne spp. Xiphinema americanum Tylenchulus semipenetrans Criconemoides xenoplax Pratylenchus vulnus Southern Interior Meloidogyne spp. Xiphinema americanum Tylenchulus semipenetrans Criconemoides xenoplax

Rootstock Origin First developed to address grape phylloxera in the late 1800s The French came to the US to collect species resistant to phylloxera Took back cuttings of many, but only V. riparia and V. rupestris rooted well from dormant cuttings Later added V. berlandieri for lime tolerance

How to Choose a Rootstock Hard to make the perfect choice / Avoid making a bad choice Want an inverse relationship between soil (water holding capacity/depth/fertility) and rootstock vigor. Production factors include: climate and affect on fruit quality; marketing fruit or wine; tons per acre required

Other Rootstock Issues Replant vs. new site (grapes following grapes) Virus induced incompatibility Important/critical to use certified stock and scion Desired clones are may not be certified Availability

V. riparia Missouri River

V. rupestris Jack Fork River, MO

V. berlandieri Fredericksburg, TX

V. riparia x V. rupestris Useful on fertile, non-calcareous soils Root system spaced evenly in the soil profile Nematode resistance varies Easy to root and graft, mothervines vary some with short canes and abundant laterals, others with long canes and few laterals

101-14Mgt Good phylloxera resistance, good nematode resistance (root-knot and dagger) Moderate vigor, lime sensitive and not drought tolerant not adapted to deficit irrigation practices Useful on wet soils, but not on heavy cracking clays Very widely used in California - a good generalist rootstock Very easy to root and graft Mothervine with long canes and few laterals

Schwarzmann Good phylloxera and nematode resistance Moderate vigor, roots and grafts well, mothervine has long canes and few laterals Not widely used in California and much like 101-14Mgt in appearance - with a more puckered leaf surface Might have better nodosity resistance than 101-14

1616C V. solonis x V. riparia Very good nematode resistance Low vigor - nematodes and high vigor soils Good phylloxera resistance Easy to root and propagate and good mothervine growth - long canes and few laterals Judged too weak in the past; recent experience - lower pruning weights, but relatively high fruitfulness

V. berlandieri x V. riparia Selected for phylloxera resistance, lime tolerance and moderate vigor Generally shallow to moderate rooting depth Most derived from the Teleki hybrids - a Hungarian breeder (1880s) Many have moderate to good nematode resistance Excellent mothervines with long canes, few internodes Graft and root moderately well - 420A Mgt difficult

Teleki 5C / SO4 Moderate vigor Moderate nematode resistance 5C does not respond well to deficit irrigation, less experience with SO4 Graft unions show scion overgrowth Very similar in appearance and growth habit Almost all of UCD source SO4 was 5C before 1992 Use declining in California

Kober 5BB Relatively high vigor and deepest roots in this group Better nematode resistance - root-knot and dagger No fanleaf degeneration tolerance Graft over growth may be as pronounced as 5C Very intolerant of viruses that cause graft failure Very similar in appearance to 5C, but female, leaf edges turn up and red T

Börner V. cinerea x V. riparia produced by Börner and Becker Very good nematode and phylloxera resistance; fanleaf testing underway Relatively hard to root and graft Field performance has been inconsistent - on some sites growth is very weak and on others very strong

V. berlandieri x V. rupestris This group was developed for drought and lime tolerance in warmer, drier parts of Europe Have deeper root systems to avoid drought Limited nematode resistance, good phylloxera resistance Most are shrubby mothervines and produce short canes and many laterals Some are more difficult to root and graft

1103P Relatively high vigor; >110R and <140Ru Moderate nematode resistance, good salt tolerance Widely used in California because it roots and grafts well, and produces more graftable canes Adaptable, but better on low vigor sites or large canopy trellis and spacing systems

V. champinii - Based Rootstocks A natural hybrid of V. candicans x V. rupestris champinioid Very vigorous Drought tolerant due to deep root system Broad nematode resistance; do not tolerate fanleaf degeneration Often more difficult to propagate

Ramsey (Salt Creek) Selected by T.V. Munson. Salt Creek is V. doaniana. Very good nematode, moderate phylloxera resistance, induces very high vigor in scions Good for sandy low vigor soils; rotate to other nematode resistant rootstocks Good salt tolerance, widely used in droughty, saline, shallow soils in Australia Dog Ridge is more vigorous (V. candicans x V. berlandieri?)

Freedom & Harmony Freedom has greater vigor and easily propagated, high K uptake Not phylloxera resistant - have vinifera in their parentage; aggressive root-knot nematode strains exist Good for sandy low vigor soils; rotate to other nematode resistant rootstocks Freedom is very intolerant of viruses that induce graft failure

VR O39-16 & O43-43 V. vinifera x M. rotundifolia siblings Only sources of tolerance to fanleaf degeneration O43-43 susceptible to phylloxera, O39-16 susceptible to root-knot nematodes May act as natural nematicides High vigor, respond well to deficit irrigation and cover crops; poor growth on limestone soils Hard to propagate

Evan Goldman Xi /Xa Population Sampling

Evan Goldman Xi / Xa Population Sampling

Nematode Resistant Rootstocks Dog Ridge, Ramsey (Salt Creek) Freedom, Harmony O39-16*, 1103P 5BBB, Schwarzmann,101-14Mgt, Börner?, 5C, SO4, 1616C italics = moderate resistance * = not root-knot resistant

RS-3 & RS-9 (Ramsey x Schwarzmann) Bred by David Ramming, selected by Mike McKenry; released in 2003 limited trial data RS-3 (1103P+) is more vigorous than RS-9 (101-14Mgt) Good nematode resistance RKN and X. index Designed to have better nematode and phylloxera resistance than Freedom/Harmony, but less vigor than Ramsey/Dog Ridge

Peter Cousins USDA Rootstocks Released in 2010 as alternatives to Freedom Matador and Minotaur siblings from a cross of 101-14 Mgt x 3-1A (candicans x rupestris) Kingfisher 4-12A (Dog Ridge x rufotomentosa) x V. riparia Resistant to Harmony and Freedom strains of root-knot nematode Field testing at UC Kearney Station

Rootstock Breeding Genetic mapping to allow MAS and stacking / combining traits Add salt and drought resistance to the GRN rootstocks Add ring resistance from rotundifolia Add vigor control and virus tolerance Campus rootstock trials with 101-14 and 1103P standards Field trials (in collaboration with farm advisors/growers) and pre-release to FPS

GRN Parentages GRN-1 = 8909-05 rupestris x rotundifolia Cowart GRN-2 = 9363-16 (rufotomentosa x (Dog Ridge x Riparia Gloire)) x Riparia Gloire GRN-3 = 9365-43 (rufotomentosa x (Dog Ridge x Riparia Gloire)) x champinii c9038 GRN-4 = 9365-85 (rufotomentosa x (Dog Ridge x Riparia Gloire)) x champinii c9038 GRN-5 = 9407-14 (Ramsey x Riparia Gloire) x champinii c9021

GRN-1 thru GRN-5 Resist 3 strains of root-knot including two that feed on Harmony and Freedom, and Xiphinema index. Resist all the above in one inoculum Resist all the above at high soil temperatures And

New Rootstock Summary Citrus Nematode Ring Nematode Lesion Nematode Pin Nematode Phylloxera Nodosities GRN-1 R R MR MR HR GRN-2 MS MS MR MR HR GRN-3 MR MR MR MR R GRN-4 MR MR MR MS R GRN-5 MR R MR MR MS They all resist all 3 strains of root-knot, X. index, these combined, and at high temperatures

GRN Trial at Gallo Lodi Malbec; Wye Rootstock trellis; quads, 5x11 spacing Yield (kg), 29Sep14 Cluster number, 29Sep14 Pruning Wts. (kg), 8Feb15 Adjusted Prn Wts (lbs) RS 9 11.2 a 88.2 0.765 a 3.06 a RS 3 14.5 ab 99.5 0.809 ab 3.236 ab GRN 5 14.7 ab 95.5 1.077 bcd 4.308 bcd GRN 4 14.7 ab 87.7 1.151 de 4.604 de St. Geo 15.5 ab 98.3 0.954 abcd 3.816 abcd GRN 1 16.0 b 86.5 1.087 cde 4.348 cde 101-14 16.1 b 99.3 0.855 ab 3.42 ab O39-16 16.3 b 100.5 0.935 abc 3.74 abc Harmony 16.4 b 95.9 0.931 abc 3.724 abc GRN 2 16.4 b 102.1 1.239 e 4.956 e 1103P 16.6 b 96.9 1.022 bcd 4.088 bcd 3309C 17.2 b 97.9 0.922 abc 3.688 abc GRN 3 18.0 b 104.5 1.079 cde 4.316 cde Fanleaf, root-knot, ring, X. americanum

Resistance of D1 group rootstock selections (GRN-3 x X. index and PD resistance) HarmA & C root-knot nematodes Genotype Egg masses/g root Genotype Egg masses/g root D1-11 0.0 R D1-24 7.1 MS D1-18 0.0 R D1-12 7.2 MS D1-2 0.0 R D1-19 11.4 MS D1-16 0.4 R D1-22 15.2 MS D1-23 1.1 R D1-17 28.8 S D1-6 1.9 R D1-21 33.8 S D1-8 2.3 MR St. George 38.5 S D1-15 2.8 MR D1-20 40.7 S 039-16 3.5 MR Harmony 52.5 S D1-7 4.0 MR D1-10 77.8 S D1-14 5.2 MS D1-1 95.6 S D1-25 5.6 MS D1-4 105.1 S D1-13 5.8 MS Colombard 121.6 S D1-9 7.1 MS D1-3 152.1 S

Resistance of D group rootstock selections (101-14 x GRN-2; 101-14 x GRN-4; 161-49C x rot. Trayshed) to Harm A&C and X. index Root knot Dagger Root knot Dagger Genotype Galls/g Galls/g Galls/g Galls/g Genotype root root root root D11-3 0.0 R 0.0 R J09-24 0.1 R 0.3 R D11-6 0.0 R 0.0 R D12-43 0.1 R 0.0 R D12-17 0.0 R 0.0 R D11-15 0.2 R 4.4 MR D12-38 0.0 R 0.0 R J09-14 0.3 R 1.4 MR D12-40 0.0 R 0.0 R D12-36 0.4 R 6.6 MS D12-51 0.0 R 0.0 R D11-4 0.7 R 0.0 R E12-18 0.0 R 0.0 R D12-31 1.0 MR 2.4 MS E12-22 0.0 R 0.0 R D11-7 1.8 MR 3.6 MS D11-1 0.0 R 0.6 R D12-32 1.9 MR 0.0 R D12-41 0.0 R 0.7 R D11-2 3.4 MR 0.0 R D11-14 0.0 R 1.8 MR G01-31 3.8 MR 0.0 R D12-30 0.0 R 9.9 MS J08-48 5.4 MR 0.0 R J09-24 0.1 R 0.3 R 039-16 6.7 MR 0.0 R D12-43 0.1 R 0.0 R J09-41 17.5 MS 0.0 R D11-15 0.2 R 4.4 MR D11-9 24.1 MS 0.0 R

Resistance of grape rootstock selection series 07107 (101-14 x rot. Trayshed) to Ring Nematode (C. xenoplax, Fresno population) Genotype Nematodes/g root Genotype Nematodes/g root 07107-177 11.6 R 07107-164 78.0 R 07107-232 20.9 R 07107-202 78.8 R 07107-206 21.9 R 07107-212 83.5 R 07107-135 23.0 R 07107-061 85.6 R 07107-110 28.2 R 07107-125 86.9 R 07107-228 38.4 R 07107-183 88.9 R 07107-241 41.4 R 07107-138 92.4 R 07107-162 48.8 R 07107-077 102.0 MR 07107-148 49.0 R 07107-006 122.0 MR 07107-160 54.6 R 07107-154 122.8 MR O39-16 58.4 R 07107-043 135.2 MR 07107-155 60.0 R 07107-050 136.5 MR 07107-159 66.3 R 07107-190 162.1 MR 07107-133 68.9 R 07107-001 556.3 MS 07107-060 72.0 R St. George 1969.6 S 07107-122 72.8 R Colombard 3980.1 S 07107-120 73.0 R Harmony 4286.3 S 07107-056 74.6 R

Genotype Galls/g Root X. index HarmonyA&C Ring Resist Egg mass/g Root Resist Nemas/g Root Resist UCD GRN1 0.0 R 0.0 R 29.3 R E28-31 0.0 R 0.0 R 175.2 MR E28-40 0.0 R 0.0 R 213.8 MR E28-49 0.0 R 0.0 R 231.3 MR E29-4 0.0 R 0.0 R 304.0 MS E28-52 0.0 R 0.0 R 379.9 MS E28-33 0.0 R 0.0 R 420.9 MS E28-36 0.0 R 0.0 R 530.7 S E28-42 0.0 R 0.3 MR 325.0 MS E25-52 0.0 R 0.8 MR 608.0 S E28-37 0.0 R 1.5 MR 348.5 MS E26-20 0.0 R 5.2 MR 586.0 S Harmony 0.0 R 17.0 S 2103.4 S E28-38 0.2 MR 0.0 R 497.9 MS E28-39 0.3 MR 0.0 R 319.4 MS E26-4 0.4 MR 25.2 S 703.6 S E28-34 0.4 MR 0.0 R 524.5 S E25-55 0.4 MR 10.7 MS 766.9 S E28-30 0.4 MR 0.0 R 183.3 MR Genotype Galls/g Root X. index HarmonyA&C Ring Resist Egg mass/g Root Resist Nemas/ g Root Resist E28-26 0.4 MR 0.0 R 316.1 MS E28-46 0.7 MR 0.0 R 195.5 MR E28-32 0.7 MR 0.0 R 261.6 MR E25-54 0.7 MR 1.3 MR 654.0 S E26-11 0.8 MR 3.1 MR 563.6 S E28-41 0.9 MR 0.0 R 483.2 MS E26-3 1.0 MR 14.6 MS 606.2 S E26-1 1.2 MS 4.5 MR 516.1 S E26-5 1.2 MS 11.8 MS 862.9 S E25-51 1.3 MS 20.5 S 886.5 S E25-53 1.5 MS 5.4 MR 389.8 MS E26-2 1.9 MS 50.2 S 286.4 MR E26-19 1.9 MS 0.9 MR 829.8 S E28-29 2.7 MS 0.0 R 467.4 MS E29-1 3.3 MS 0.0 R 136.7 MR E28-28 6.7 MS 0.0 R 314.4 MS Colomb. 37.9 S 59.3 S 1222.3 S St. George 56.7 S 22.9 S 1431.0 S E Series Selections

Root-knot Ring Genotype Egg masses/g root Nematodes/g root E23-12 0 R 1 R E23-11 0 R 7 R GRN1 0 R 7 R E20-38 0 R 24 R E12-26 0 R 53 R E23-36* 0 R 80 R E20-34 0 R 132 MR E22-27 0 R 198 MR E20-26 0 R 301 MR E12-29 0 R 331 MR E22-07 0 R 345 MR E12-15 0 R 373 MR E22-47 0 R 393 MR E12-24 0 R 409 MR E20-36 0 R 414 MR E20-30 0 R 494 MR E23-13 0 R 533 MS E23-52 0 R 545 MS E23-37 0 R 573 MS E12-12 0 R 574 MS E12-17 0 R 604 MS E12-22 0 R 613 MS E23-53 0 R 648 MS E21-42 0 R 696 MS Root-knot Ring Genotype Egg masses/g root Nematodes/g root E12-33 0 R 706 MS 02-122-4 0 R 731 MS E12-04 0 R 753 MS E20-44 0 R 880 MS E22-25 0 R 1063 S E23-34 0 R 1262 S E12-20 0 R 1363 S E21-55 0 R 1403 S E22-43 0 R 1427 S E23-43 0 R 1468 S E23-35 0 R 1507 S E21-53 0 R 1544 S E20-42 0 R 1639 S E23-10 0 R 1760 S E23-31 0 R 2286 S E23-29 0 R 2443 S E23-26 0 R E23-28 0 R E23-45 0 R E12-02 1 MR 2123 S E12-25 1 MR 271 MR E22-55 1 MR 942 MS * Ramsey x 08314-15 (8909 & GRN4)

Thanks!