Index. G Gamma index, 51, 54, 58, 59 grain index, 53, 55 green spaces, 151, 160 guide criteria, 12

Similar documents
Lecture: Landscape Ecology

The European Landscape Convention And National Landscape Strategy. Tony Williams Irish Landscape Institute

Visual Impact Assessment - December Figure 5.2: Viewshed analysis of the haul route.

Implementation of European Landscape Convention in Portugal insights from regional and local planning practice

Landscape identification and Characterization The Portuguese Experience: From the national to the local level

Landscape considerations in Forests & Woodlands. Jill Bullen, Senior Landscape Specialist

ICOMOS-IFLA PRINCIPLES CONCERNING RURAL LANDSCAPES AS HERITAGE

WHAT DEFINES A NATIONAL PARK CITY

A Network Theory Framework for Urban Cultural Heritage Conservation. Manal Ginzarly LEMA, Université de Liège

Cooperative Research in Water Management

THE LANDSCAPE OBSERVATORY OF TAGUS RIVER: RELEVANCE OF TRANSFRONTIERCOOPERATION BETWEEN SPAIN AND PORTUGAL.

25/08/2017 1

The future of landscape characterisation and the future character of landscape Seminar 3-4 March 2014

The Landscape in the revision of the municipal master plans: Guidelines for the implementation of the European Landscape Convention

The European Landscape Convention Florence, 20 October 2000

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT

The Initiative Landscape Character Assessment as a tool for the Conservation of Natural Values in the Eastern Mediterranean

Tables of Criteria and Matrices for Landscape Assessment (LSCA & LVIA)

Assoc. Professor Constantinos Cartalis Scientific Adviser of the Piraeus Bank Cultural Foundation

Norwich (United Kingdom), 9-10 September 2004

WORK PACKAGE 4 DELIVERABLE D.T4.1.4

Agenda 21. Arthur Lyon Dahl. Contents

Alpine Green Infrastructure Joining forces for nature, people and the economy

INTEGRATION OF LANDSCAPE IN LAND USE PLANNING POLICY IN RELATION TO THE NEW EUROPEAN LANDSCAPE CONVENTION

Actors, scales and modes of heritage representation:

History as a source for understanding todays landscape Ingrid Sarlöv Herlin, SLU, Sweden

AT A GLANCE... Our People, Culture & Place. A plan to sustain Ballarat s heritage (final draft)

Cotswolds AONB Landscape Strategy and Guidelines. June 2016

The Charter of Athens, From heritage preservation to integrated conservation. Charter of Athens Venice charter 1964

EU nature directives & Natura 2000

Problems and Solutions of Environment and Urbanization in the World

CYPRUS LANDSCAPE POLICY

Ecological Assessment and Evaluation

Green Infrastructure. IENE 2012 International Conference

The European Landscape Convention Florence, 20 October 2000

2011 ASLA Design Awards. Top of the Rockies National Scenic and Historic Byway Merit Award Bluegreen. Planning & Urban Design

Preparing a Sustainable Tourism Strategy

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization RECOMMENDATION ON THE HISTORIC URBAN LANDSCAPE

Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape, including a glossary of definitions

Uses and historical water management in the Landscapes of Cultural Interest in Andalusia José María Rodrigo.

7. The Landscape. 7.1 Introduction. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Scoping Report

Valuing Historic Places

Landscape management. Case Study: the situation in the Autonomous Community of Valencia (Spain).

Capacity Building for Impact Assessments

Excellencies, Dear colleagues from other agencies and organizations, Ladies and Gentlemen,

GREEN NETWORK APPLICATIONS IN ESTONIA

SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT

Connecting rural dwellings with rural development

Iran s Efforts for Progressive of Environmental Impact Assessment In a Transboundry Context

Presented by: Remy Norbert DUHUZE Director/ER&PC REMA

for Biosphere Reserves

Nature & Biodiversity

Rev. RG Networking European Landscape Observatories: the Florence Charter

Carpathian Convention as a governance mechanism in the mountainous region

Sharing experiences in landscape Approaches. Yogyakarta, December 2009) Cora van Oosten,

Ministry of Natural Resources, Mining and Spatial Planning of the Republic of Serbia Biljana Filipovic Technical Assistance Team Montenegro, Cetinje

On the way to HARMONY. Ewa Kaczmarczyk

10/23/18. Science informed regional planning: opportunities for better outcomes. Seeking Better Outcomes for Our Regions

Scottish Natural Heritage. Better places for people and nature

Global Workshop on the Satoyama Initiative. Ministry of the Environment of Japan United Nations University-Institute of Advanced Studies (UNU-IAS)

Western Sydney Parklands Australia s Largest Urban Park

CONSERVATION PLAN BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF INTEGRITY

CITY VIEW OBJECTIVES

STANDARDS OF INTERNATIONAL CULTURAL AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT

The European Landscape Convention in Sweden

Western City District What we heard

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) as a management tool for protected areas: Canada and Mexico

Guidelines on the inclusion of Cultural Landscapes, Towns, Canals, Cultural Routes and Fossil Sites on the World Heritage List 1

The Charter of European Planning BARCELONA 2013

Human Smart Landscape: An Adaptive and Synergistic Approach for the National Park of Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni

EUROPEAN LANDSCAPE CONVENTION CEP-CDCPP

People, Places and Landscapes

Visual Impact Assessment January 2013

Coordinadion and Cooperation. The Czech Republic Experience

EAGLE group Barbara Kosztra (HU), Stephan Arnold, Michael Bock (DE) Presented by: Gergely Maucha (HU)

Smart City Governance URBIS Solutions. David Ludlow, Assoc. Professor European Smart Cities University of the West of England, Bristol

RECOMMENDATION ON THE HISTORIC URBAN LANDSCAPE

Global Report on Culture and Sustainable Urban Development

Wind energy development in the South Pennines landscape

Tool 7 Biophysical reading of the territory

Bosnia and Herzegovina Education in the University. Dejan Radošević Tropea, 3-4 October 2018

IDENTIFY, ANALYSE, CHARACTERISE THE LANDSCAPE TO ACT, IMPROVE THE KNOWLEDGE

PRESENTATION TO THE CROSS PARTY GROUP ON ARCHITECTURE AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT A MANIFESTO FOR THE BUILT EMVIRONMENT

The value of territory before human transformation: the place of space in supporting growth, productivity and innovation

3. Highway Landscaping Assessment

Hobart A Strategic Framework

How keep.eu can be used? Baiba Liepa, Interact Programme

Resolution XII NOTING also that with the increasingly rapid urbanization, wetlands are being threatened in two principle ways:

LANDSCAPE PLANNING: LOCAL DIVERSITYS AND GENERAL STRATEGIES

A Growing Community Rural Settlement Areas

Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention

25th November Final statement by the ministers in charge of urban development

Visual Impact Rating Form - Instructions

International Forum on Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems

The European Landscape Convention The English Heritage Action Plan for Implementation

Landscape Aesthetics. Prof. Dr. Adrienne Grêt-Regamey Sibyl Brunner Ana Stritih

Draft Resolution XII.10

Statutory and Non-Statutory Designated Sites and Ecology

THE AOTEAROA-NEW ZEALAND LANDSCAPE CHARTER

The Gianyar Declaration 2017

Transcription:

Index A Aarhus Convention, 9 accessibility, 115, 121 actions of valorisation, 201 aggregation of indicators, 15, 195 197, 215 agricultural policies, 1, 3 5, 12 agri-environmental indicators, 5, 13, 34, 38, 39, 45, 73 all-patch pattern measures, 58 Alpha index, 52, 54, 58, 59 amenity, 109, 110, 121, 122, 124, 126 Analytic Network Process, 212, 214 APAT, Agenzia per la protezione dell ambiente e per i servizi tecnici, 36, 41, 45 applicability, 7 applicability of the indicator, 163 application of indicators, 193, 196, 197, 201, 203, 207, 208 applications, 35, 37 B basic data, 208 benchmarking techniques, 212 biodiversity, 57, 62, 64, 143, 157 biological territorial capacity, 203 206 biophysical components, 107 biotopes, 51, 55, 61, 64 BTC, biological territorial capacity, 47, 52, 54, 58 61, 63, 64, 66 69, 71, 72 C calculation algorithm, 208, 209, 212 calmness, quietness, 115, 120 categories of indicators, 31 33, 42 44 CED PPN European Documentation Centre on Natural Park Planning, 151 153 Central Europe, 32 character areas, 104 character indicators, 34 characterisation, 79, 81, 82, 84, 88 91, 93, 94, 98 characterisation of landscapes, 33, 34, 43 choice experiments, 170, 182, 191 chorological patterns, 49 chorological study, 48 circularity ratio, 50, 53 Civilscape, 9, 14 closedness, 111, 119 CMEF model, 19, 20, 28 CMEF, Common Monitoring Evaluation Framework, 172, 173, 191 cognitive constructs, 107 coherence, 111, 114, 115, 120 collective imagination, imagery, 107, 109 Common Monitoring Evaluation Framework, 1, 4, 12, 14 complexity, 114, 117, 120, 123, 124 composite indicator, 193 condition of use of territory, 141, 142 connectivity, 47 conservation areas, 80, 84, 86, 87 conservation costs, 170, 174, 176, 183, 207 Consorzio per il Sistema Informativo del Piemonte, 11 contagion index, 54, 57, 58, 74 contingent valuation method, 170, 182 contrast, 106, 115, 119, 120 Corine Land Cover, 34, 37, 39 cultural heritage, 77, 79 83, 86, 88 90, 92, 95 97 Cultural Heritage and Landscape Code, 10, 14, 42, 46 cultural identity, 82, 88, 111, 121 cultural landscape, 2 4, 77, 78, 82, 83, 93, 94, 97, 103, 104 C. Cassatella, A. Peano (eds.), Landscape Indicators, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0366-7, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 217

218 D data gathering, 208, 211 decision-making process, 23, 25, 28, 212 definition of landscape, 3, 6, 10 degradation, 114 degraded landscapes, 141, 143, 144, 146, 149, 150, 156, 160, 163, 205, 207 209, 211 designated landscapes, 35 DG AGR, Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, 36, 40, 45 dispersion of patches, 50, 55 diversity, 47, 53, 55, 61, 62, 67, 74 Dobris Assessment, 2, 6, 14 dominance index, 51, 55, 57 DPSIR model, 7, 15, 17, 18, 26, 27, 142 145, 158 162, 167, 176 driving forces, 142, 143, 145, 158 E ecological and landscape network, 141, 143, 144, 150, 157 ecological function, 33, 40 ecological indicators, 36, 38, 41 ecological niches, 61 ecological planning, 47, 49, 62 ecomosaic, 49, 53, 55, 56, 58, 61, 64, 67, 69 economic analysis, 43 economic analysis methods, 118 economic function, 33 economic landscape indicators, 168 170, 173, 175, 176 economic strength of landscape, 168, 172, 174, 175, 191 economic value and benefits, 2, 6, 9 economic value of the landscape, 36, 42, 43, 167 172, 174, 177, 179, 180, 182, 189, 190 ecotopes, 55 EEA, European Environment Agency, 36, 37, 39, 40, 45 EEC, European Economic Community, 142, 151, 164 effectiveness of the planning, 141, 143, 144, 149, 156 158, 163 effectiveness of the planning aims for the landscape, 207 EIA, Environmental Impact Assessment, 25, 56, 62, 63 ELC, European Landscape Convention, 36, 42, 46 ELCAI project, 57, 74 ELCAI project, European Landscape Character Assessment Initiative, 34, 36, 37, 45 ELISA study, Environmental Indicators for Sustainable Agriculture, 38, 46 elongation index, 50, 53, 54 employment, 168, 173, 174, 176, 189, 190, 203, 205 enhancement, 80, 81, 83, 84, 88 90, 92, 93, 96, 97 EnRisk project, 57 ENRISK study, Environmental Risk Assessment of Agriculture in Europe, 36, 37, 45 environmental and territorial data, 8 environmental assessment, 15 Environmental Impact Assessment, 3, 10, 14 environmental indicators, 15 19, 23 25, 28, 32, 38, 39, 172, 175, 191, 192 environmental reporting, 3 environmental sociology, 108 ESDP, European Spatial Development Perspective, 39, 45 European Landscape Convention, 1 4, 6, 8, 11, 13, 14 European Network of Local and Regional Authorities, 8, 14 evaluation function, 33 evaluation matrix, 193 evaluative synthesis, 212 evenness, 47, 51, 53, 55 57, 61, 62, 64, 66 69, 71, 72, 74, 203 206 exceptionality, 89, 90, 93 expert based (approach), 107 expert knowledge, 8, 109 expert/design parameters, 107 ex-post phases, 12 externalities, 167 F fame, 109, 116, 121 123, 126, 131, 132 fame (variation in time), 204, 205 feasibility, 208 fragility, 90, 94 functional control indexes, 49, 58 functional indexes, 51 functions of indicators, 31, 33, 196 evaluation function, 195, 196 orientation function, 196 recognition function, 196 screening, scoping, monitoring, 196 G Gamma index, 51, 54, 58, 59 grain index, 53, 55 green spaces, 151, 160 guide criteria, 12 Index

Index H harmony, 111, 112, 114, 120 hedonic pricing, 170, 179 182, 191, 192 heterogeneity, 111, 120, 134 Hill diversity, 56 historic areas, 86 historical identity, historicity, 115, 120 historical value, 78, 82, 89, 98 historical-cultural characteristics, 78, 80, 83, 88 90, 93, 94 historical-cultural components, 78, 88 historical-cultural heritage, 38, 42, 43 historical-cultural indicators, 86 historical-cultural structures and systems, 100 historic-cultural landscape, 6 holistic indicator, 7 homogeneity, 111, 120, 135 housing price, 170, 174, 176, 179, 207 human perception, 33, 40 I iconography of places, 116 identity, 89, 97 image of the territory, 118 imageability, 106, 108, 113, 114, 120, 122, 123, 126 128, 132 index, 15, 20 23, 27, 29 Indicatori per il paesaggio, 37, 38, 45 indicators of change, 34, 213 indicators of risk, 39 indicators of sustainability, 39 intangible culture, 35, 38, 43 integrity, 108, 112 114, 119 IRENA project, Indicator Reporting on the Integration of Environmental Concerns into Agriculture Policy, 36 38, 45 isolation of patches, 53, 55, 58 Italian landscape, 9, 10 IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, 151, 152, 157 J judgement of experts, 4 K key international studies, 36 knowledge of the landscapes, 42 L land capability, 143, 145, 146, 156, 158, 163 land capacity, 141, 143, 144, 146, 147, 156 219 land consumption, 143, 144, 146 149, 156, 159, 163 land consumption indicator, 194, 204, 207 land use, 34 39, 41 43, 45, 141, 142, 146, 152, 164 land use diversity, 111 landscape assessment, 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 13, 141, 142, 146, 156, 163 landscape atlases, 3 landscape character, 79, 104 Landscape Character Assessment, 57, 104 landscape characterisation, 9 landscape closeness, 37, 38 landscape coherence, 37, 38 landscape compatibility, 106, 113 landscape component, 4, 7 landscape conservation, 33, 40, 43 landscape degradation, 194 landscape dimensions, 2, 4, 6, 31, 33 35, 45, 164, 215 landscape diversity, 37, 38, 111, 116, 119, 122 landscape ecology, 4, 34, 35, 42, 43, 47 49, 55, 56, 58, 59, 73, 74 landscape ecology indicators, 47, 48, 61, 74 landscape ecologygy, 73 landscape experience, 108 landscape features, 33, 40 landscape functions, 2 landscape indicators, 15, 16, 26 landscape management, 2, 5, 33, 39, 40 landscape monitoring, 1, 3, 5, 6, 8 10, 12, 193 landscape mosaic, 47 51, 53 59, 61, 62 Landscape Observatories, 8, 9, 12 landscape observatory, 156 159, 161, 163 Landscape Observatory of Catalunya, 33, 36 landscape openness, 32, 37, 38 landscape planning, 2, 141, 157, 158, 161, 163 landscape preferences, 106, 115, 118, 135, 139 environmental preferences, 108 preference predictors, 108, 114, 126, 139 visual preferences, 105, 106, 113, 115 landscape protection, 2, 5, 10, 33, 39, 40, 42, 43, 141 144, 150 152, 156, 157, 162, 163, 205 landscape quality, 32, 35, 38, 39, 43 landscape significance, 195 landscape studies, 4 6, 8, 10, 11 landscape vision, 213 landschap, 32 landshaft, 32 legibility, 114, 120 listed assets and areas, 82 listed buildings, 82, 84, 86, 87 listed cultural assets, 79

220 listed heritage features, 83 86 local scale, 193, 197, 202, 205 207 locomotion, 114 M MAB, Man and Biosphere programme, 151, 160 maintenance, tidiness, care, 115, 120, 121 Margalef richness, 53, 55, 56 McIntosh diversity, 51, 56 measurement methods, 35 Mediterranean Europe, 32 memorable elements, 111, 120 Menhinick richness, 51, 53, 55, 56 metastability, 59, 60 monitoring, 141 143, 145, 147, 148, 151, 156, 158 164 MTT Agrifood Research Finland, 36, 41, 45 multidimensional value, 194 multifunctionality, 4 multipurpose indicator, 194 mystery, 114, 120 N Nature and Biodiversity (NaB) indicators, 41 network connectivity, 51, 54, 58 Northern Europe, 32 numeric indexes, 54, 55 O O Neill and Turner dominance, 51, 53 obstruction of panoramic views, 119, 122, 123, 126, 130 obstruction of view from viewpoints, 205, 207 OECD, 2, 3, 14 open spaces, 86 openness, 108, 111, 112, 114, 115, 119, 120, 128 opinions and expressions, 106, 107, 109, 116, 121 order, 111, 115 orientation function, 33 outstanding beauty, 111 P paesaggio, 32 PAIS project, 33, 36, 39, 45, 57, 73 paisaje, 32 participatory approach, 212 patch, 47, 49 51, 53 59, 64 patch-centred measures, 58 pattern indexes, 49 paysage, 32 perceptions of the stakeholders, 109, 116, 121 perceptive aesthetic value, 4, 6 perceptual quality, 106, 112 percolation index, 52, 58, 59 percolation theory, 52, 59 phenomenological approach, 107, 108 Piemonte, 5, 7, 11 Piemonte region, 47, 64 67, 69, 73, 75, 199 203, 208 Piemonte Regional Authority, 147, 148, 151 political and social sensitivity, 214 presentation of indicators, 15, 25, 26, 176 preservation of the assets, 204 207 pressures, 143, 144, 146, 147, 149, 157, 159 process indexes, 49 promotion of actions for further knowledge of historical-cultural heritage, 204, 205 prospect-refuge, 114, 120 protected landscapes, 4, 8, 10 protected natural areas, 141, 143, 144, 150 157, 160, 162, 163 psychology, 108 psychophysical components, 107 public authorities, 2, 8 public concern, 105, 108, 109, 112, 116, 121 public opinion, 111, 113 public perception based (approach), 107 public surveys, 108, 113, 115, 117, 123, 127, 128 Q quality objectives, 2 Index R rarity, 114, 121 receptors, 109 recognition function, 33 Recommendation, 2, 6, 8, 12, 13 Recommendation CM/Rec (2008)3, 42 recreational benefits, 168 170, 174, 176 178, 191, 207 recreational function, 117 Regional Landscape Plan, 201, 203 regional scale, 193, 197, 201, 203 205, 207, 208 relative richness index, 50, 53, 55 renderings, 115 renovation, 81 restoration, 81, 90, 96 richness, 47, 49, 51, 55, 56, 62, 67 rural areas, 141 144, 146, 147, 150, 156, 161, 163, 194

Index S scale of application, 47 49, 59 63, 66, 71 scenic attractiveness, 112, 119 scenic beauty, 108, 139 scenic quality, 112, 114, 119, 139 scenic value of landscape, 34, 35, 38, 43 SEA, Strategic Environmental Assessment, 23, 25, 62, 63, 67, 68 seasonal effects, 119 sector indicators, 39 selection of indicators, 6, 7 sensibility of the planning, 141, 143, 144, 146, 156, 157, 159, 161, 163 sensibility of the planning aims for the landscape, 207 sensitivity, 112, 121 sensitivity to the transformations, 35, 37, 39, 43 sensory and emotional perception, 105 atmospheric effects, 108, 126 seasonal effects, 108 sensorial dimensions, 108 sensory qualities, 115 sensory/perceptual parameters, 107 soundscape, 108 sensory qualities, 120 sets of indicators, 202, 203 settlements, 80, 82, 103, 104 Shannon diversity, 51, 53, 56, 57, 61, 62 shape factor, 50, 53 55, 61 significance, 82, 89, 90, 94, 105, 112, 122 124, 126 significance of the indicator, 211 Simpson dominance, 53, 57 site management plans, 4 smoothness, 114, 120 social acknowledgement, 106, 110, 118, 131, 132 social function, 33, 109, 117 social groups of reference, 109 social perception, 33, 35, 40, 42, 105 107, 109, 118, 121, 122, 131, 134 social sensitivity, 110, 117, 122 spaciousness, 115, 120 spatial indexes, 54 Spatial structure landscape, 57 SPESP, Study Programme on European Spatial Planning, 36, 39, 45 Strategic Environmental Assessment, 1, 3, 6, 10, 13 structural control indexes, 49 subsidies, 175, 176, 190 suitability of the indicator, 163 sustainability, 1, 3, 13, 142 145, 148, 150, 151, 156, 157, 160, 161 sustainable development, 1, 2 synthesis indicators, 193 221 T tangible culture, 35, 38 targets, 197 temporal characterization, 212 territorial assessment, 141, 142 territorial databases, 9, 11 territorial economy, 42, 43 territorial indicators, 141 143, 157, 163 territorial planning, 141, 142, 144, 156 159, 161 163 territorial policies, 142, 144, 148 territorial processes, 141 143, 163 territorial scale, 32, 34 39, 41 territorial scale of reference, 5 7 thresholds, 35, 210 tourism, 173, 175, 176, 185, 187, 189 tourism flows, 205 tranquillity, 109, 110, 112, 117, 119, 121, 122, 124, 126, 139 transferability, 32 transformation, 78, 81, 88, 91, 92 travel costs method, 170, 176, 177 tree canopy coverage, 120, 122, 126, 136, 138 type of representation, 208 types of indicators, 31, 33, 36, 38 40 types of value, 116 aesthetic value, 106, 110 112 appropriateness, 110, 115, 121 cultural value, 106, 110, 112 economic-productive value, 110 educational value, 109, 110 fruition value, 106, 110, 117, 122 identitary value, 110, 111, 116 118 intangible values, 106, 117 perceptual value, 111, 112 ratified value, 110, 118 scenic value, 108, 111, 112 value in itself, intrinsic value, 110, 121 typicality, 89, 90, 94 U UNESCO, 2, 4, 8, 151, 160 urban environment, 5 urban landscape, 5 use of the territory see land use, 43 V valorisation, 141 144, 156, 157, 162, 163 value added, 174, 176, 189 variety, 107, 108, 111, 114, 115, 120, 122, 123, 126, 134, 135

222 Index variety (or visual diversity), 195 versatility of the indicator, 163 viewshed, 112 visibility of the sky at night and silence, 122, 124, 126, 129, 205, 207 visual and multisensorial perception, 106, 107, 122 visual assessment, 112, 139 visual detractors, 112 visual diversity, 111, 114, 122, 134 visual impact, 106, 107, 113, 119, 122, 137 visual penetration, 120 visual penetration, focality, 114, 120 visual perception, 32, 35, 38, 40, 42, 43 W weighting factors, 212 weighting of indicators, 7, 13, 15, 23 wildness, 112, 117, 121 willingness to pay, 170, 174, 176, 182, 191 Winter Olympics, 11, 13 world heritage list, 3, 79, 84 world heritage sites, 84, 86, 87, 103