Memorandum Planning. Thursday, January 8, 2015

Similar documents
Planning Commission Report

Joe Pool Lake Lake Master Plan Public Information Meeting Presentation of Final Draft Revision July 31, 2018

Venice Pumping Plant Dual Force Main Project Draft EIR

Port of San Diego Sea Level Rise Ad Hoc Committee Meeting 1 of 3.. September 18, 2018

Rhode Island Shoreline Change Special Area Management Plan

Staff will be providing an overview of the project need, purpose and intent for consideration as part of the Amendment cycle.

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

Remi Mendoza City Planning Academy March 13, 2017

Introduction and Overview

City of Missoula and Missoula County Open Space Planning Open House

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

Lawrencetown Beach & Rainbow Haven Beach

Introduction to the Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Update. City of Bellingham Planning Department 2005

TOWN OF BETHLEHEM OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION PLAN PUBLIC MEETING: OCTOBER 12, 2017

ADOPTION OF THE REVISED OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN

2035 General Plan Update and Belmont Village Specific Plan. Joint Study Session with the City Council and Planning Commission April 12, 2016

INTRODUCTION. 1.1 What is a General Plan? 1.2 Requirements for a General Plan. 1.3 Introduction to Monterey County

Ashbridges Bay Erosion and Sediment Control Project

GENERAL PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. February 19, 2010 Regional Planning Council Meeting

Infrastructure, Development and Enterprise Services. Natural Heritage Action Plan (NHAP) Project Initiation

STAFF REPORT FOR STANDARD COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT #CDP FEBRUARY 26, 2015 CPA - 1 PO BOX 238 APTOS, CA 94001

STEWARDSHIP OF LONG ISLAND SOUND S ECOLOGICAL AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES

PROCESS CHECK Implementing Ordinances planned for adoption with the General Plan:

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 5H

CHATHAM COUNTY S PATH TO SUSTAINABILITY - THE NATURAL RESOURCES SIDE

Riparian Buffer on the Bushkill Creek. Policies

Central Oahu Sustainable Communities Plan

Coyote Hills Restoration and Public Access Project Coyote Hills Regional Park C o n c e p t P l a n a n d S i t e P r o g r a m

4/8/2015 Item #10D Page 1

MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES BUILDING

PSRC REVIEW REPORT & CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation March 25, 2004 LOS ANGELES GREEN VISION PLAN. File No.: Project Manager: Marc Beyeler

Scarborough Waterfront Project

Chapter Six: Tree Removal and Erosion Control

Notice of Preparation and Notice of Public Scoping Meeting. At Dublin Project

CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING ZONING INFORMATION FILE Z.I. NO POTRERO CANYON

HALF MOON BAY LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM. d), JOHN M. St>NGER ASSOCIATES INC S.F.' CA EIOO VISUAL RESOURCES OVERLAY.

Planning Commission Retreat March 23 rd Comprehensive Plan Update Discussion

Rapid Transit Implementation Working Group September 14, 2017

HAZARD MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 1472

Coast Protection, Development and Coastal Biodiversity. Brian Caton Member CEMAC, AMLR NRM Former Chair & Member, Coast Protection Board

Lake Nokomis Shoreline Enhancement Project

Planning for Staten. Habitat Restoration and Green Infrastructure. Island s North Shore

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

NOTICE OF PREPARATION

Master Plan for Preservation and Scenic Conservation (1995)

City Council Special Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO. C.

Standard Development Timeline

INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN. June 24, 2008

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15, 2016

Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

Lake O the Pines Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting April 25 & 27, 2017

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 2010 Legislative Session. Council Members Dernoga and Olson

TOWN OF BEDFORD CONSERVATION COMMISSION

glenwood canyon design process I-70 Statement of Direction TRG Recreation Subcommittee Colorado Division of Highways August 11, 1976 prepared by the

THE PROTECTION OF CHATHAM COUNTY S NATURAL RESOURCES - THE POLICY SIDE

City of Marina Local Coastal Program Volume I Land Use Plan

Smart growth on the Oregon Coast: Addressing Impacts of climate change. What I will Cover: Oregon Land Use and OCMP Connection

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

COMMUNITY SUSTAINABILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE

General Plans. Tom Dansie, AICP Steve Pastorik, AICP

City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT PLACERVILLE OFFICE:

WAC #7 3/14/14. Coachella General Plan Update

Objective: Resolution to recommend adoption of the Big Thompson Assessment to the Planning Commission

Oak View Estates Specific Plan

Silverwood Masterplan Kickoff Meeting. Jim Neidhart Dane County Parks Planning

PARTF Scoring System for Grants

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

Fact Sheet Regulating Oceanfront Accessory Structures Updated June 10, 2013

SF REC & PARK STANYAN STREET IMPROVEMENT. Supervisor London Breed District 5. Project Manager Dan Mauer Recreation and Parks Department

City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering staff report - dated October 14, 2009 and the Hearing Examiner Report signed October 21, 2009.

Community Workshop November 19, 2014

TOWN OF NEW CASTLE - Master Plan Update

7.0 SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

Leonard s Beach Secondary Plan (Alcona North) Official Plan Amendment

Public Visioning City of Kelso Planning Commission

TO: Denver Planning Board FROM: Analiese Hock, Senior City Planner DATE: March 13, 2018 RE:

CITY OF CYPRESS 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California (714) DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PERMIT PROCESS

Area Plans. September 18, 2012

CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE WHITEBELT VISIONING EXERCISE ADDENDUM TO THE GTA WEST LAND USE STUDY WORK PROGRAM

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

CITY OF MORRO BAY PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT 955 SHASTA AVENUE. MORRO BAY, CA

DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4

Chapter 5: Natural Resources and Environment

The City of Poway Creating a Town Center. Patti Brindle, AICP City Planner, City of Poway APA Luncheon September 28, 2006

It Takes A Village.. Preserving Rural Character In Standish

SAQCC FIRE D&GS TRAINING SUB COMMITTEE COURSE CURRICULUM. Standards Training SANS 369 ORIGINATOR

Canyon Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting March 18, 2016

SF RECREATION & PARK DEPARTMENT URBAN TRAILS PROGRAM

EXHIBIT A CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA COASTAL MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Mayor Dave Netterstrom and Members of the City Commission. Anthony Caravella, AICP, Director of Development Services

Countywide Green Infrastructure

CAO Update Status Work continues on products: Draft ordinance BAS report CAO process summary (2002 to present) Comprehensive e Plan policy review Some

AvalonBay Communities + BRIDGE Housing. Mission Housing Habitat for Humanity Pacific Union Development Corporation

Blue/Green Infrastructure Study Accomack County, VA

Transcription:

Memorandum Planning Thursday, January 8, 2015 7.A. To: Coastal Advisory Committee From John Ciampa, Associate Planner Subject: Review Draft Local Coastal Program Copies: James Pechous, City Planner Purpose of Tonight s Meeting Staff is requesting the Coastal Advisory Committee (CAC) review and provide comments on the draft LUP. The CAC meeting will also serve as the first of five public meetings (see schedule below) where the public will have the opportunity to provided comments and feed back on the LUP. The LUP is posted on the City webpage and there is also a designated email address (lcp@san-clemente.com) for public to send comments. The CAC acts as an advisory committee to provided input to staff, Planning Commission, and the City Council on coastal related issues. Because the Local Coastal Program (LCP) is the planning document used by the City to protect coastal resources and guide development in the Coastal Zone, the CAC function is to review and make recommendations on the draft LUP. These comments and recommendations will be forwarded to Planning Commission and City Council. Background The City Council identified certification of the LCP as a high priority implementation measure of the General Plan. In April, 2014, the City Council approved a contract with DUDEK and McCabe and Associates to assist staff in preparation of the LCP. The City s LCP is a planning document similar to the General Plan but specific to the City s Coastal Zone. The LCP, prepared in partnership with the California Coastal Commission. The LCP is divided into two parts, the Coastal LUP, that establishes the City s coastal policies and land uses and the Coastal Implementation Plan (IP) which includes development standards and requirements that implement our City s LUP. The first phase is to obtain approval of the LUP. The second phase is to obtain approval of the IP and then receive Coastal Commission certification of a LCP. Currently the California Coastal Commission (CCC) has permit authority over all development within the City s Coastal Zone. The adoption of a new Local Coastal Planning Memorandum

City of San Clemente Page 2 Program will give the City more control over approving projects within the City s Coastal Zone and will streamline the Coastal Development Permit review process. The purpose of completing the San Clemente LCP would be to transfer the majority of the permit authority within Coastal Zone over to the City. The Coastal Commission will retain permanent coastal permit jurisdiction over development proposed on tidelands, submerged lands, and public trust lands, and the Commission also acts on appeals from certain local government coastal permit decisions. The City s Goals for the LCP Include: Balance competing interests and needs to ensure long-term protection of coastal resources Address issues of statewide significance, including maintaining and providing public access, preserving coastal habitats, protecting coastalrelated and visitor-serving land uses, promoting recreational opportunities for all income groups, and supporting Smart Growth and transit oriented development Update LCP to include current data regarding biological resources through an updated biological inventory and evaluation of coastal canyons, bluffs, ESHAs, and potential ESHAs to identify habitat and species changes, factors affecting biological resources Address effects of climate change by including policies and measures to mitigate potential threats form geologic hazards, habitat changes, seismic and coastal flooding, and sea level rise through appropriate land uses and development standards, public improvements, bluff monitoring and protection, and information sharing. Receive public input and update policies to reflect local needs, conditions, and concerns Develop clear standards and procedures for Coastal Development Permit processing /streamline permit process The LUP is comprised of six chapters that cover much of the same information as the current LUP. The current LCP was never certified by the Coastal Commission, which limited the City s permit authority over projects in the Coastal Zone. The new document provides more policies addressing a range of topics that have become a focal point over the years. The new LUP addresses issues including: sea level rise, community events, water quality, updated biological inventory, sand replenishment, coastal erosion and protective structures, and a number of other issues. The primary chapters of the report include the following topics: Land Use The LUP provides parameters for new development in the City s Coastal Zone. Land use types include residential, commercial, mixed use, public and institutional, and open space. The Land Use Plan and New Development section describes

City of San Clemente Page 3 each land use within the City, including the type, maximum density, and intensity for each use that may be permitted which are consistent with all applicable LUP policies. Public Access and Recreation Maximum public coastal access is a fundamental goal of the Coastal Act and a key part of San Clemente s charm. But the Coastal Act goes beyond just ensuring physical access. It also emphasizes the importance of recreation and visitorserving land uses that meet a wide range of incomes and interests. Marine and Land Resources The Coastal Act sets high standards for the protection of Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas (ESHA), including various types of wetlands, riparian areas, coastal prairies, woodlands and forests, and other natural resources in the coastal zone. The Commission has gained significant experience in applying the Coastal Act and LCPs to the protection of such resources. Also, there have been some important changes regarding the protection of ESHAs that stem from new scientific research, such as the identification of new sensitive species, or from court decisions interpreting the requirements of the Coastal Act. Hazards & Shoreline/Bluff Development Potential hazards in the City include, but are not limited to, coastal bluffs, slopes with low stability and high landslide potential, surface slope failures, seismic ground shaking, liquefaction, flooding, wave action, tsunami, and fire hazards. In addition, storm generated tidal surges and rising sea-levels present potential hazards that must also be considered. These events may result in loss of beach sand and other sedimentary deposits which are critical to the protection of coastal lands and bluffs and for public safety, recreation and wildlife habitat. A key component of the LCP is managing development in conformance with Coastal Act policies in order to respond to coastal hazards, reduce risks to life and property, avoid substantial changes to natural landforms and minimize the need for protective structures. Visual, Historic, and Cultural Resources The Coastal Act policies require the protection of scenic coastal areas and the preservation of cultural resources. Scenic resources include coastal bluffs, coastal canyons, natural landforms and designated scenic view corridors from publiclyowned properties along or through public rights-of-way, as defined in the Coastal Act and/or designated by the City.

City of San Clemente Page 4 Review Process Staff has been meeting with Coastal Commission staff monthly, most recently on November 6, 2014, to discuss the project scope, provide preliminary comments on the draft LUP, and identify key topics Coastal Commission will require be included in the Program. With the assistance of the consultants and direction from the Coastal Commission staff, a LUP has been drafted. On August 21, 2014, the City held a public workshop to gain input from the public on their interests and values to ensure that they are included in the LUP. The City noticed all property owners that live along coastal canyons, bluffs, and individuals that requested to be on the interested parties list. Public comments received at the meeting were related to improving public access, bluff preservation, Capistrano Shores Mobile Home Park land use designation, increasing parking for beach areas, and acquiring public access through Cypress Shores/Cove. On November 2014, the Executive Management Team (ExDMT) reviewed the draft LUP and provided comments. The ExDMT s comments have been incorporated into the document and now it is ready for public review. On December 24, 2014, the California Coastal Commission received the current draft for review. The draft LUP has also been sent to interested parties and posted on the City s LCP webpage http://san-clemente.org/departmentsservices/planning-services/long-range-planning/local-coastal-program. See the project schedule below for the future milestones and meetings on the LCP. Recommendation Staff requests that the CAC review and make recommendations on the draft LUP. These comments and recommendations will be forwarded to Planning Commission for their review, tentatively scheduled for February 18, 2015, and City Council. LCP SCHEDULE Task Date Task 4.2: Revise/Update Draft LUP July-December 2014 Task 4.3: Committee/Planning Commission/City Council/CCC/Public Review January 2015 (committees), February-March 2015 (Planning Commission w/ 2 meetings) April 2015 (City Council) Task 4.4: Revise Draft LUP April 2015 Task 4.5: CCC Review and LUP Revisions August 2014, Dec-Jan 2014-15 (prelim) May, 2015 (formal)

City of San Clemente Page 5 Task 5: Update LCP/IP June 2015 February 2016 Task 5.1: Prepare Initial Draft and Peer Review of Draft IP June-July 2015 Task 5.2: Revise/Update Draft IP August 2015 Task 5.3: Planning Commission/City Council/CCC/Public Review November-December 2015 Task 5.4: Revise Draft IP January 2016 Task 5.5: CCC Review and IP revisions September 2015 (prelim) February 2016 (formal) Task 6: CCC Certification February 2016 October, 2016 Task 6.1: Revise LUP/IP City Council Approve February March 2016 Task 6.2: Submit Final Draft LCP to CCC March 2016 Task 6.3: CCC Certifies LCP By July 2016 Task 6.4 City posts certified LCP on web; distribute training materials; public/staff training workshops August-September, 2016 Task 6.5 Close out LCP grant, provide final documentation October, 2016 Task 6.6 Begin Implementation of Certified LCP October, 2016