One Shields Avenue Madera CA Davis CA USA

Similar documents
EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR PISTACHIO PRODUCTION

Louise Ferguson, Extension Pomologist, University of California, Davis at Kearney Agricultural Center

FIELD TRIALS FOR RESISTANCE TO PHYTOPHTHORA ROOT ROT

OPVC CONTINUING PROJECT REPORT: YEAR OPVC REPORT COVER PAGE (maximum 2 pages) OPVC Project Number:

A COMPARISON STUDY OF MICRO-PROPAGATED CLONAL WALNUT ROOTSTOCK GROWTH FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS OF MICROBIAL AND HUMECTANT SOIL AMENDMENTS

THE EFFECTS OF MINITUBER SIZE AND HARVEST DATE ON GERMINATION, TUBER SET, AND YIELD OF RUSSET BURBANK POTATOES. Steven R. James '

Effect of Five Planting Dates on Yield of Six Sweet Onions

UC Agriculture & Natural Resources California Agriculture

Evaluation of new low- and moderate-chill peach cultivars in coastal southern California

Steps in the Solution of Avocado Problems

Development of Early Blight and Late Blight Resistant Tomatoes. Report of a research supported by:

Parental Rice line Breeding and New Variety Breeding in Korea

Pistachio rootstocks. Elizabeth J. Fichtner Farm Advisor: nuts, prunes, olives UCCE Tulare and Kings Counties

Vegetable Report 1 from Experiment Station, HARC December 1998

Developing new varieties

4. VEGETATIVE PROPAGATION

Tree growth over multiple years

California Cling Peach Board ANNUAL REPORT-2010 IMPROVED ROOTSTOCKS FOR PEACH AND NECTARINE. Ted DeJong, Professor, University of California, Davis.

HOW DO YOU THIN A ROOT ROT REPLANT BLOCK?

propagation whose distinguishable characters are of agricultural significance.

CALIFORNIA LETTUCE RESEARCH PROGRAM. April 1, 2007 to March 31, 2008 LEAF LETTUCE BREEDING

PRINCIPLES OF PRUNING AND TRAINING G. A. Cahoon and R. G. Hill, Jr Department of Horticulture Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center

Walnut Marketing Board Final Project Report December Project Title: Irrigation Management and the Incidence of Kernel Mold in Walnut

WALNUT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2005

VENTURA COUNTY AVOCADO ROOT ROT RESISTANCE PLOT

Increasing the growth rate by any means decreases the juvenile period

2009 NC-140 Peach Rootstock Trial in Massachusetts

Welcome to Balsgård. Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU)

SELECTING CRIMSON CLOVER FOR HARD SEED AND LATE MATURITY. G. W. Evers and G. R. Smith

Chap 12. Plant Propagation. I. Three Methods of Plant Propagation

The Sun-Blotch Disease of Avocado

Timing Kerb Applications in Lettuce

Crop Profile for Persimmons in California

Humulus lupulus. Importance of hops. Basic botanical information. Crop development and cultivation. Impact of hop varieties. Variety development.

+ BULLETIN. DURING the past few years the Arboretum has started rather ARNOLD ARBORETUM OF POPULAR INFORMATION

Title: Development of Micropropagation and Acclimation Protocols for the Commercialization of a New Bonsai Ornamaental Tree for the California Market.

The Italian Plum Rootstock Trial: Results for Sicilian Environmental Conditions

Growing Fruit: Grafting Fruit Trees in the Home Orchard

FIRST YEAR RECOVERY FOLLOWING A SIMULATED DROUGHT IN WALNUT. D. A. Goldhamer, R. Beede, S. Sibbett, D. Ramos, D. Katayama, S. Fusi, and R.

PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS ON WHITE LUPINE AT MADRAS AND REDMOND, OREGON, IN J. Loren Nelson '

Unit E: Urban Forestry. Lesson 4: Pruning Trees in Urban Settings

USE OF THE ETIOLATION TECHNIQUE IN ROOTING AVOCADO CUTTINGS

BREEDING, GENETICS, AND PHYSIOLOGY. Development of Semidwarf Long- and Medium-Grain Cultivars

Alpine Russet Management Recommendations Idaho

Sweet Cherry Rootstock Traits Lynn E. Long, Oregon State University

Ion Duţu, Crăişor Mazilu, Ancu Sergiu. Abstract

TRANSMISSION OF ROSE MOSAIC VIRUSES

French Pear Rootstocks

Some Crossing Experiments with Sugar Beets

EVALUATION OF SIZE CONTROLLING ROOTSTOCKS FOR CALIFORNIA PEACH, PLUM AND NECTARINE PRODUCTION

New Cherry Training Systems Show Promise Lynn E. Long, Extension Horticulturist Oregon State University Extension Service/Wasco County

Issues in Orchard Establishment. Site Selection Orchard Design Site Preparation Scion/Rootstock Selection Orchard Economics

ENHANCEMENT OF AVOCADO PRODUCTIVITY. PLANT IMPROVEMENT: SELECTION AND EVALUATION OF IMPROVED VARIETIES AND ROOTSTOCKS

Evaluation of Grafted and Non-Grafted Hybrid and Heirloom Tomatoes in a High Tunnel

GROWTH AND PERFORMANCE OF OWN-ROOTED CHANDLER AND VINA COMPARED TO PARADOX ROOTED TREES

XI B R.AR.Y OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS G30.7. HGb. ho.354-3g3. cop. 2. TCR1CUITURE

gardens Growing Asparagus

Your Florida Dooryard Citrus Guide - Introduction 1

Selection of Clonal Avocado Rootstocks in Israel for High Productivity under Different Soil Conditions

Contents. PDF File. Prepared by G.W. Krewer, Extension Horticulturist; Floyd Hendrix, Plant Pathologist

Procedures for Generation of Potato Tuber Families from true (botanical) seed

Tree Fruit for the Home Gardener

POTATO VARIETY RESPONSE TO PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER

Performance of 18 Cover Crop Species in a Newly Planted Vineyard in Lake County by Glenn McGourty, Steve Tylicki, Julie Price, and Jim Nosera

Onion Production. IDEA-NEW, May, 2010

East Malling Rootstock Club. Felicidad Fernández AHDB Tree Fruit Day 22 Feb 2018

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums 1

Peach Genetics and Breeding for the Future.

Apple Rootstock Trials in British Columbia, Canada

Figs and Citrus for Texas Gardens

EVALUATION OF NEW USDA ADVANCED FIRE BLIGHT-RESISTANT PEAR SELECTIONS

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums 1

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums 1

Proceedings of The World Avocado Congress III, AVOCADO BREEDING IN ISRAEL

HYBRID SEED PRODUCTION IN SORGHUM. Nucleus seed stage : Maintenance of basic source by seed to row progenies.

Integration of Tree Spacing, Pruning and Rootstock Selection for Efficient Almond Production

EFFECTS OF SALINITY ON GROWTH AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS OF 'HASS' AVOCADO ON THREE ROOTSTOCKS.

Evaluation of grafting for the mature green tomato production system

Growing Apples in the Piedmont. A 15 year experiment on 25 acres in the northern piedmont of NC.

Clean planting material - an effective strategy to prevent diseases in grape vines

Fusarium wilt of lettuce. Michael E. Matheron Extension Plant Pathologist Yuma Agricultural Center

Trap Design and Bait Longevity Experiments for Managing Spotted Wing Drosophila

Green Peach Aphid Apterous Green Peach Aphid Alate Symptoms of Leafroll GREEN PEACH APHID/PLRV POPULATION DYNAMICS

Effect of Method of Application of Double Superphosphate on the Yield and Phosphorus Uptake by Sugar Beets 1

Cling Peach ANNUAL REPORT 2006 EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR TOLERANCE TO BACTERIAL CANKER AND ORCHARD REPLANT CONDITIONS.

THINKING ABOUT GROWING PISTACHIOS? BEN THOMAS Ben Thomas Consulting

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums1

Unit E: Fruit and Nut Production. Lesson 3: Growing Apples

Management practices for control of soilborne pathogens in UC strawberry cultivars. Kirk Larson UC Davis / UC South Coast REC

Vegetative Propagation methods - theory

SEIBLL HIUITS. HOME OfilIDEllS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * aleciapt. By 0. T. McWhorter

43 Hoop House. Great Lakes Fruit, Vegetable & Farm Market EXPO Michigan Greenhouse Growers EXPO. December 4-6, 2018

Identifying the SIX Critical Control Points in High Tunnel Production

The Case of the Dunbar Dogwood: A Neglected Hybrid

Camellia Breeding at. Matt Taylor

Budding, Planting, and Young Tree Training

2016 World Crops Research Update - Okra and Eggplant

IV International Symposium Agrosym 2013

Nutri-Grow MAGNUM 2-0*-16 FOLIAR NUTRIENT FOR NURSERY CROPS, TURF AND COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPING

Project Leader: Gary S. Bender* 1

Transcription:

FIG CULTIVAR DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION J. F. Doyle and L. Ferguson K. Herman Department of Pomology The Specialty Crop Company University of California 17053 Road 26 Suite D One Shields Avenue Madera CA 93637 Davis CA 95616 USA USA Keywords: breeding, persistent, Calimyrna, caprification, pollination Abstract The principal objective of this project is the development of a high quality, large size, light colored dried fig, as similar as possible to the Calimyrna fig variety. In contrast to the Calimyrna, this new fig would not need to be caprified (pollinated) and would have a small closed ostiole (eye), restricting insect access to the interior of the fig fruit. Hybridizations directed at the project goals began in 1991 and continued in 1992. By the end of 1993, about 2400 hybrid fig seedlings had been planted in seedling rows at the UC Kearney Agricultural Center (KAC), Parlier, California, USA. From 1994 through 1996, 45 seedlings were initially selected as having some promise of development into the desired type of cultivar. From 1997 through 2000, evaluation of the 45 selections has continued, primarily from fruit produced in the original seedling block. In addition to the oldest seedling block, additional plantings of the advanced selections have been made in a consolidated selection block at KAC and in three grower test plots in Madera County, CA. The primary characteristics under evaluation are fruit size, skin color, skin quality, ostiole size, fruit flesh quality and density, fungal decay potential and tree productivity. During the 2000 season, fruit was observed at KAC and in grower trials. Although production was light to very light in some of the grower locations, the 45 selections were reduced to 12 primary candidates by the end of the year 2000, using the seven criterion listed above. Evaluation of fungal decay potential was carried out during 1999 and 2000. A field test planting of a row of 50 trees of the most advanced fig selection 6-38W was established in spring of 1999. Although too young yet to produce much fruit, the growth and production characteristics of this selection will be observed over the next several years. An additional test planting of three advanced fig selections will be established in grower trials in spring of 2001. 1. Introduction Bearing orchards of all fig cultivars growing in California as of July 31, 2000 are estimated at 14,726 acres. Non-bearing fig trees are estimated at 576 acres, for a total statewide estimate of 15,302 acres. The Calimyrna fig cultivar makes up about 43 percent

of the total, estimated at 6,083 acres bearing and an additional 425 acres non-bearing. Prices received by producers for dried merchantable Calimyrna figs have always been high, reflecting the desirability of this cultivar for use in packaged figs. Unfortunately, average per acre production for Calimyrna is relatively low. Statistics for the 1999 crop year show 3,654 tons of Calimyrnas (merchantable and substandard) produced on 6,083 acres statewide, for an average of 0.60 tons or 1200 pounds per acre. Newer orchards have a somewhat higher production potential, due primarily to higher tree densities. Incidence of fruit loss or quality deterioration due to endosepsis, smut and other internal diseases is especially high in the Calimyrna cultivar. The process of caprification of this Smyrna (non-persistent) type fig allows the pollinating wasp to vector various fungal and bacterial organisms into the fruit. The large open ostiole of the Calimyrna also allows other insects to enter the fruit, causing further potential for disease contamination. The development of a persistent (common) type fig similar to Calimyrna, but not needing caprification to set a crop and having a small tight eye, would greatly decrease the amount of fruit loss due to spoilage. This type of fig would enhance the possibility of substantially increasing net return per acre to the grower. The primary objective of this project is the development of a high quality, large size, light colored Calimyrna type fig that would not need caprification (pollination) and would have a small closed ostiole (eye) restricting insect access. 2. Materials and methods The University of California has maintained a fig cultivar improvement program since 1922. The Conadria and DiRedo cultivars were released to the industry from this program in the mid 1950s and the Tena cultivar was selected and released in the mid 1970s. The key to the development of hybrid fig seedlings that are persistent or of the common type came in 1942 when Dr. Ira Condit discovered a unique type of caprifig growing at Cordelia, California. This caprifig, thought to be a European cultivar named Croisic, was parthenocarpic, edible and could pass on the persistent characteristic to a portion of a seedling population developed from it. In time, through the efforts of Dr. William Storey, the Cordelia caprifig was improved through hybridization. By the late 1970s, three superior persistent caprifigs had been identified for use as pollen parents, each bearing heavy loads of fruit with green skin, white meat and amber pulp. One of the caprifigs contained genes of the Calimyrna cultivar. By the late 1980s, with additional hybridization, four new persistent caprifigs had been identified by James Doyle, each containing a varying percentage of the Calimyrna genome. The current University of California fig cultivar development program is located at the University of California Kearney Agricultural Center (KAC), Parlier, California. The breeding strategy used to achieve the goal of this program is based on the use of the various most recently developed persistent caprifigs, each containing some percentage of Calimyrna genome. The caprifigs are used in a recurrent backcross system, using the Calimyrna fig as the recurring female parent. These backcrosses produce seedling populations with each generation of seedlings possessing an increasing percentage of the Calimyrna genome. Once fruiting of the new seedlings begins, caprifigs and nonpersistent figs are identified and discarded. The persistent type figs are retained and evaluated, using

the criterion of fruit size, quality and tight eye. Seedling figs not meeting the criterion are discarded. Initial evaluation is accomplished in the seedling blocks. Once superior selections are identified, they are re-propagated and placed first in the KAC selection block and then eventually in commercial fig plantings so that comparisons can be made between the new selections and established cultivars. By use of the recurrent backcross method and careful selection, most of the desirable characteristics of Calimyrna could presumably be restored in a common (persistent) type fig. 3. Results and discussion Controlled cross-pollinations directed at the development of hybrid fig seedlings were initiated in June of 1991 in several Fresno County, California, commercial fig orchards. Pollen was introduced into several different female parent figs with primary emphasis on use of the Calimyrna cultivar. Table 1 displays numbers of seedlings grown in 1992 from the 1991 hybridizations. The female and pollen parents used in each cross are listed, as well as the percentage of Calimyrna genome in each of the persistent caprifig pollen parents. Table 1. 1992 Fig Seedling Populations Female Parent Pollen Parent % Calimyrna #Seedlings Calimyrna D3-11 50 890 Calimyrna (#C) D3-11 50 63 Calimyrna D3-9 25 76 Calimyrna D13-39 38 124 Stanford Calimyrna D3-11 50 273 The seedlings listed in Table 1 were field planted in 1992 at the Kearney Agricultural Center. The permanent seedling rows were 12 feet apart and the seedlings were spaced 2½ feet down each row. A low volume (fanjet) irrigation system was installed in 1992 to provide for controlled irrigation of the high-density seedling block. All seedlings were suckered and staked in a vertical position during their developmental stage in order to promote as rapid and as directed growth as possible. This technique has been utilized to shorten, in as much as possible, the unproductive juvenile growth stage of hybrid seedlings. Additional hybrid fig crosses were made during 1992, partially emphasizing Tena as the female parent and the persistent caprifig D3-11 (with 50% Calimyrna genome) as the pollen parent. This cross was specifically directed at the incorporation of the tight eye characteristic found in the Tena cultivar into a seedling population also partly derived from Calimyrna. Additional seed from the 1991 crosses of Calimyrna by the D3-11, D13-39 and D13-54 caprifigs was planted in 1993 to increase the numbers of seedlings in each of these families and to obtain the fullest expression of the range of traits contained in the various caprifigs. Table 2 lists the parentage and number of fig seedlings planted in seedling rows at Kearney in 1993.

Table 2. 1993 Fig Seedling Population Female Parent Pollen Parent %Calimyrna #Seedlings Tena D3-11 50 353 Calimyrna (F) D3-11 50 196 Calimyrna (B) D3-11 50 196 Calimyrna (CL) D3-11 50 17 Calimyrna D13-39 38 58 Calimyrna D13-54 38 98 2.1. Seedling Evaluation Production of fruit on the seedling populations planted at Kearney in 1992 and 1993 began with the first small amount of cropping in 1994. By 1998, all of the hybrid seedlings had produced enough fruit to complete the initial selection process within the seedling blocks. Seventeen fig selections were identified in 1994 and 19 fig selections were identified in 1995. The last 9 selections were made in 1998. The 1994 selections were grafted into a grower orchard in spring of 1995. Trees made from cuttings of the initial 17 selections were grown in a nursery at Kearney during 1995. Finished trees were established in two grower sites, as well as in a selection block at Kearney in spring of 1996. Cuttings of the nineteen 1995 selections were nursery planted at KAC in the spring of 1996 and were subsequently established as trees in two grower plots and in the KAC fig selection block in spring of 1997. Most of the 9 most recent 1998 selections were rooted as cuttings and were planted in the KAC selection block in 2000. Additional trees of these last selections will be grafted on existing five-year old trees in the KAC selection block in spring of 2001. Seven primary characteristics are being used to evaluate fruit produced in the KAC seedling blocks as well as in the grower test plots. These include fruit size, dried skin color, dried skin quality, ostiole size, dried fruit flesh quality and density, fungal decay potential and tree productivity. From 1997 through the 1999 growing season, all 45 selections were observed in the KAC seedling block. Insect pressure and fruit contamination is very high in the Kearney blocks, limiting the level of fruit flesh quality and density evaluation that can be carried on at that location. The other six selection criterion can and have been used at Kearney to identify the superior selections. Evaluations made during the 1998, 1999 and 2000 seasons have now reduced the original 45 selections down to 12 primary candidates for further evaluation. Evaluation of fruit produced at grower test locations continued in 2000 but was rather preliminary and limited by the light amount of fruit present. Fruit evaluation will continue in 2001 with emphasis on the increasing numbers of fruit samples produced in grower test plots. These evaluations will involve the two plantings in Madera County as well as the seedling and selection block at Kearney. Fruit size, dried skin color and quality, ostiole size, dried fruit density and quality and tree productivity will again be the primary characteristics under evaluation. Data from fruit samples at Kearney have indicated some correlation between small ostiole size and lowered incidences of internal decay and infestation. All of the most advanced 12 selections now appear to have a smaller ostiole opening than Calimyrna. During 1999 and 2000, evaluation of the

potential for fungal decay was accomplished by T. Michailides and M. Doster (Department of Plant Pathology, UC Davis). This evaluation will continue in the original seedling blocks during 2001. A single test planting of 50 trees of the advanced fig selection 6-38W was established in a grower test location in 1999. From observations made at Kearney, this selection appears so far to be among the best of the final 12 selections. Data from grower test plantings has been inconclusive due to the young age of the trees. The 6-38W is a cross of Calimyrna with the persistent caprifig D13-39. It is a large size, high quality fig with good color and a relatively tight eye. The tree is large, vigorous and highly productive. The original seedling tree has produced as much as 60 pounds of dried fruit per year at Kearney.