Nordic Built Cities Challenge: Evaluations by the Nordic/international jury

Similar documents
THE SOUL OF NØRREBRO Winner of the Nordic Built Cities Challenge Climate Adaptation Copenhagen

Climate Adaptation Copenhagen. Hans Tavsens Park & Korsgade by SLA Winner of Nordic Built Cities Challenge 2016

Our City Centre is a vibrant, creative and welcoming destination, with a modern business, cultural, shopping, leisure and residential offer

Western City District What we heard

SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND COHESION POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Urban Policy within the framework of EU Cohesion Policy

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

Scottish Natural Heritage. Better places for people and nature

A community driven catalyst for an equitable, healthy, (economically viable and environmentally) sustainable corridor

Spatial and Economic Master Planning. Resilient, healthy and happy places to live, work and learn

Northern Territory Compact Urban Growth Policy

Thomas Kastrup- Larsen, Mayor of Aalborg. Vision

TRADA University Challenge 2018

Jury Report 2019 June 2018

section 3: Vision, Values and Goals

DALY CITY VISIONING PROCESS COMMUNITY WORKSHOP 3 MAY 8, 2008

TAKE ACTION #1 - STREET: THE PLACE GAME AND THE PLINTH GAME

JOINT DECLARATION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA ON A PARTNERSHIP FOR SMART & SUSTAINABLE URBANISATION. New Delhi, 6 Oct 2017

Welcome to the Oakridge Centre Open House

North District What we heard

178 Carruthers Properties Inc.

Fostering metropolitan cooperation for sustainable urban development THE MONTRÉAL DECLARATION ON METROPOLITAN AREAS

EU Interregional Cooperation

Economy Vision Statements: Social Wellbeing Vision Statements: Natural Environment Vision Statements:

LIVEABLE. A diverse and welcoming capital city with an enviable lifestyle and strong community. Liveable City of Adelaide Strategic Plan

Urban Design Manual PLANNING AROUND RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS (PARTS) Introduction. Station Study Areas

Kelowna Sustainability Checklist

Recent UN and EU Sustainable Development Policies (Post 2015): What challenges for city planning and governance

Group Executive Liveability and Natural Assets

LINDEN HOMES McArthur s Warehouse, Gas Ferry Road. Welcome. Feedback

World Towns Agreement

The Hadean-Creation studio.

BLOK BADEL ZAGREB. Competition for the urban-architectural concept design for the BADEL SITE redevelopment COMPETITION NUMBER: ZG-UA

CALL FOR HOARDING DESIGN... to be installed during the conversion of the Old Abattoir Building into the Valletta Design Cluster

Valuing Historic Places

Vancouver. Title of the Initiative. Initiative Duration. Submitted by. Comments by the Jury

Plano Tomorrow Vision and Policies

Smart Growth Development Checklist

OUR GREATER SYDNEY A metropolis of three cities. OVERVIEW. connecting people. DRAFT Greater Sydney Region Plan

COMMUNITY SUSTAINABILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE

Jury Report for the European Green Capital Award 2015

1 Introduction. Chapter. In this chapter:

SOUTH AFRICA S PREPARATIONS FOR HABITAT III COMMON AFRICAN POSITION FOR HABITAT III. Habitat III Urban Breakfast 5 October 2016

NZIS Urban Design Strategy. September 2012

ELK GROVE GENERAL PLAN VISION

A Commons Approach to Sustainable Cities and Human Settlements

Cotswolds AONB Landscape Strategy and Guidelines. June 2016

An advanced tool for assessing and guiding sustainable urban development

The Urban Development Network

Strasbourg SUMP Award: Finalist factsheet. Local Transport facts. Urban transport policy objectives of the city:

DRAFT GREATER SYDNEY REGION PLAN OBJECTIVES, STRATEGIES AND ACTIONS

INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF CITY AND REGIONAL PLANNERS 2016 ISOCARP AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE

Sustainably Repositioning Greyfield Sites. Greyfield Sites Anywhere

BROOKLYN PARK / 85TH AVE LRT STATION CDI DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES DRAFT

Draft Western District Plan

The Charter of European Planning BARCELONA 2013

Toward a climate adapted stormwater management regime in Oslo?

What s in a Name Sustainability, Smart Growth, New Urbanism

Excellencies, Dear colleagues from other agencies and organizations, Ladies and Gentlemen,

Jury Report. European Green Capital Award.

K. SMART ASSOCIATES LIMITED

Urban Growth Management in Seven New World cities: Aligning visions and quality neighbourhood outcomes

Entry for Green Dot Awards 2011 Concept Category. Suzhou Eco-Town

Create a connected ecological network. Connect districts with transit. Let the centre define the community

EAST SELKIRK SECONDARY PLAN

Norwich (United Kingdom), 9-10 September 2004

1Planning. Approach. Part I Chapter 1: Planning Approach

Development of green infrastructure in EU regions Nature-based solutions delivering multiple benefits

Central City District What we heard

Elodie Gonthier (Team leader) Kevin Ramirez Sandra Velasco Krishna Chandran Anna Aghvanyan Sirin Hamsho

2040 LUP is a part of the Comprehensive Plan and carries the same legal authority. Economic Challenges

The American Institute of Architects, Honolulu Chapter Directory of Local Public Policies

greenprint midtown SUSTAINABILITY ACTION PLAN 2012

Wooden Urban Villages

Suffolk Coastal Local Plan Review Issues and Options, August 2017, Public Consultation

South District What we heard

Kampala Declaration on Building Inclusive Growth and Liveability in African Cities

AT A GLANCE... Our People, Culture & Place. A plan to sustain Ballarat s heritage (final draft)

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2018 January 25. That Calgary Planning Commission recommend APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

MOBILITY HUB GUIDELINES 2012 TAC Sustainable Urban Transportation Award Submission BACKGROUND MOBILITY HUB GUIDELINES

4 Sustainability and Growth Management

The 14 th international City.People.Light award

BETTER URBAN PLANNING

DRAFT WESTERN CITY DISTRICT PLAN PLANNING PRIORITIES AND ACTIONS

D-O LRT Zoning Discussion. Chapel Hill Boards & Commissions October 16, 2017

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

Climate Adaptation: Existing Infrastructure and Retrofitting the City

CONTENTS 2.0 A FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE GROWTH 2.1 MANAGING SUSTAINABLE GROWTH THE VISION TO GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 2.3 MARKHAM STRUCTURE

City Introduction & Context

RE: QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT PLANNING POLICY REVIEW

Nader Obied Abd al raheem hathat. Dr. Farid S. Al-Qeeq

Landscape Conservation and Sustainable Development

Indonesia s Typology of Cities

CONSULTANT VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT

Wollondilly Resilience Network (WReN) Inc. Comments on the Draft South West District Plan

INK SOMETHING WICKED THIS WAY COMES

Key Principles. 290 Phasing Principles and Programme

NASSAU COUNTY TOWN HALL NEW YORK & CONNECTICUT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES. A Unique Bi-State Partnership to Improve Jobs, Housing and Transportation

NEW VISIONS OF URBAN POLITICS MEDIUM-SIZED EUROPEAN CITIES IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAY 14-16, 2014, OLOMOUC, CZECH REPUBLIC

2009 Community Excellence Award DOWNTOWN LANGLEY MASTER PLAN

Transcription:

Nordic Built Cities Challenge: Evaluations by the Nordic/international jury 29 August 2016

Evaluation and decision of the jury of the Nordic Built Cities Challenge The jury is pleased to submit our final evaluation of the winners of the Nordic Prize in the Nordic Built Cities Challenge. The competition has focused on outstanding Nordic innovative solutions to challenges that are related to specific urban spaces in the Nordic region, but that also are relevant around the world. According to the instructions given to the jury, the goal was to select three winners that best fulfil the three criteria of the Nordic Built Cities Challenge; compliance with the Nordic Built Charter, high innovation, as well as export and development potential. The selected winners are: First place: The Soul of Nørrebro, Hans Tavsens Park and Korsgade, Copenhagen, Denmark Second place: Kera Co-Op City, Kera, Espoo, Finland Third place: Eyes of Runavík, Hillside in Runavík, Faroe Islands The jury concluded that the three winners represent solutions in a diversity of urban situations a small community, a suburban area and a part of a large city. The winners also represent different countries participating in this Nordic cooperation programme. The selected projects definitely have the potential to result in innovative Nordic solutions including a wide range of disciplines, knowledge and expertise. Side 1 av 5

Winner (1st place): The Soul of Nørrebro Lead partner SLA A/S Project owner City of Copenhagen City Copenhagen Country Denmark Physical space Hans Tavsens Park and Korsgade, Nørrebro, Copenhagen. Challenge The challenge is to handle flooding from rainstorms in an intelligent way with synergies for public spaces and local community social development. The proposal The proposal seeks to develop a sensuous, varied, blue-green and site-specific nature-oriented landscape concept for flooding in Nørrebro that merges recreational and natural landscape with utilitarian considerations. The space will be developed together with the Municipality of Copenhagen and the local residents and stakeholders. The proposal also entails an urban exploratorium: Copenhagen Fablab for City Nature. Argumentation of the jury The proposal complies well with the charter principles in a convincing way. It is innovative in that it introduces a new type of climate change adaptation. The Soul of Nørrebro combines technological and social factors. In doing so, it solves flooding problems and creates community development. It proposes a social process involving local stakeholders with the purpose of creating ownership, co-creativity and a sense of community. It utilizes and enhances the energy and organization of local institutions like the school and the church. The Soul of Nørrebro takes the diversity of the area into account, has a humanistic approach and brings different disciplines together. The jury finds the proposal of high esthetic value, where the play and flow of water brings logic to the landscape. With a blue-green approach it creates a new and unique model for flood management. It leverages utility investment for more holistic, sustainable and resilient results that create both social and technological benefits. The proposal breaks new ground and has development and export potential though a smart application of technical, cultural and social values. Side 2 av 5

Recommendations of the jury The jury unanimously recommends that The Soul of Nørrebro be the top winner of the Nordic Built Cities Challenge. Winner (2nd place): Kera Co-Op City Lead partner B&M Architects Project owner S Group City Kera, Espoo Country Finland Physical space Currently, this large industrial park is separates the existing and future residential areas and the train station. The site does not have any existing population but the development of Kera aims for 15,000 new residents and 10,000 new jobs. Presently, the space is fully occupied by a massive industrial logistics centre, composed of extensive warehousing in large-footprint buildings and related office space and infrastructure. The site is level, with asphalt, concrete and buildings covering most of the area. Challenge The challenge of transforming the industrial area owned by S-Group in Kera consists of two parts: 1) circular economy solutions to deal with interim uses and then waste materials as the existing industrial buildings are demolished; and, 2) smart community planning and urban design that will result in a new neighbourhood attractive for residents and highly sustainable, with all services and facilities accessible within 20 minutes walk, without the need to use a private car. The proposal The proposal offers a 20-minute walkable neighbourhood structure and a diversity of circular economy solutions. The neighbourhood is mixed use, connected through a network of high quality urban spaces and linked directly to regional rapid transit. Argumentation of the Jury The proposal responds directly to the principles and complies well with the charter. Kera Co- Op City includes an array of many innovative ideas. For instance, it will accommodate future autonomous vehicles, it arranges public space as a catalyst for activity, it suggests community Side 3 av 5

coordinators as agents of community development, it offers many housing forms for diverse levels of income, and it strongly embraces micro-climate conscious planning and design. The individual innovations are brought together into a coherent scheme. There is clear focus on social cohesion and to create a liveable and walkable neighbourhood. It is innovative while still building on history and local conditions. Many of the solutions included in the 20-minute neighbourhood will have both inspirational and technical exportability while also being highly practical. The proposal makes a good case of sustainable and liveable urbanism in a suburban setting, creating a high density area whilst having a clear focus on public spaces and the quality of everyday living. It puts a focus on connectivity both within and outside the area. The combination of density and connectivity creates conditions for supporting services and a commercial infrastructure. In the creation of the space, a mix of market and non-market developers is used, creating different types of housing and a genuine social mix. This enables a residential area that is resilient over time, which is strongly endorsed by the jury. Export potential is the strength of the project and there is a world market for these types of solutions. Recommendations of the jury The jury unanimously recommends that Kera Co-Op City be awarded the second place of the Nordic Built Cities Challenge. Winner (3rd place): Eyes of Runavík Lead partner White Arkitekter A/S Project owner City of Runavík City Runavík Country Faroe Islands Physical space The site is located on a hill side between the areas of Hjallavegur and Blikagøta and has been identified by the municipality for future development. It will function as a transition between the rural hinterland and settlement. Challenge Typically, construction of suburban housing is organised in a pattern of single-family homes served by a local road with driveways to each house. The housing uses all the land thereby disrupting natural systems and processes, and is expensive to build and service. The goal is to Side 4 av 5

establish a viable and attractive alternative type of residential neighbourhood without large incision in the terrain and landscape but including homes that are smaller and therefore more affordable as well as arranged to maximize social interaction and support. The proposal The proposal seeks to achieve the lightest touch possible on the natural landscape while creating a new and innovative landmark. It is specifically designed for the climatic conditions on the island and provides a new building typology adaptable for steep terrains. Argumentation of the jury The proposal complies with the principles of the charter and presents a number of innovations at many scales. It is a well thought out concept with solutions such as wind-shells, private gardens and community rooms. The jury believes that Eyes of Runavík tackles climate issues in an innovative way, using geothermal energy, collecting rainwater and using recycling surplus material. The building design fulfils passive housing criteria and cleverly manages the prevailing winds to minimize impacts on day-to-day liveability. It presents a new housing typology for the Faroe Islands and, if embraced by consumers could position Runavík at the forefront of sustainable suburbanism while also transforming the image of the city. It conserves natural space by limiting the building footprints and gently increasing the density. The affect will be to offer a new way of more responsible living in the Faroe Islands. This type of housing has potential to re-establish lost social relations of the traditional village and to tackle new social requirements, such as that for an aging population. There is strong export potential with the concept of Eyes of Runavík. The concept will be relevant not only in areas where there is a need to build in steep terrain, but also in areas facing challenges with urban sprawl and new social demands as well as sites in very different climate zones. In the further development of this proposal, the jury urges a process where citizens and potential consumers are intimately involved in detailing this new way of living in Runavík. Recommendations of the jury The jury unanimously recommends that Eyes on Runavík be awarded the third place in the Nordic Built Cities Challenge. Side 5 av 5