Golf Session 1Papers MATERIALS AND METHODS

Similar documents
2003 NTEP Bentgrass Putting Green Cultivar Evaluation Performance Data, Cale A. Bigelow and Glenn A. Hardebeck

MANAGING MIXED ANNUAL BLUEGRASS CREEPING BENTGRASS FAIRWAYS M.G. HENDRICKS, B.E. BRANHAM, AND M. COLLINS DEPT. CROPS AND SOIL SCIENCES M.S.U.

MSU Research Update. Irrie:ation Study on Kentuckv Bluee:rass

ITALIAN GOLF FEDERATION GREEN SECTION

LAWN RENOVATION & OVERSEEDING

HealthyGro Fertilizer Trials

Grass Species and Fertilization Practices to Minimize Negative Effects of Lawns. Dr. Rebecca Brown University of Rhode Island

Wildflower Planting for Golf Courses

Wear Tolerant Grasses for Use on Sports Fields in a Cold Climate M.A. Anderson and J.B. Ross

The Impact of Post Application Irrigation on Dollar Spot, Brown Patch and Algae Control with Renown Fungicide, 2008

THE EFFECTS OF HUMATE AND ORGANIC FERTILIZER ON ESTABLISHMENT AND NUTRITION OF CREEPING BENT PUTTING GREENS

Title: Growth and Physiological Reponses of Creeping Bentgrass to Saturated Soil

Virginia Tech VIRGINIA POLYTEHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY

Wear Tolerant Grasses for Use on Sports Fields in a Cold Climate M.A. Anderson and J.B. Ross

Lesson 2 of 4. Self-Guided Educational Module

Turfgrass Sod General

MANAGEMENT OF MIXED ANNUAL BLUEGRASS / CREEPING BENTGRASS FAIRWAYS

Diseases of Warm-Season Grasses

Lawn Problems and How to Fix Them. Pedro Perdomo Nisso America, Inc. HGS March

Evaluation of Alternative Grasses for Turfgrass Use J.B. Ross and M.A. Anderson

Preparing Your Lawn for Spring and Summer. Pedro Perdomo Nisso America, Inc. HGS March

ROOT GROWTH OF SODDED CREEPING BENTGRASS AS INFLUENCED BY

N Grasses ORNAMENTALS. Grasses

Evaluation of Kentucky Bluegrass and Fine Leaf Fescue Cultivars J.B.Ross and M.A. Anderson

Dollar Spot Management Guidelines

COMPARATIVE SOD STRENGTHS AND TRANSPLANT SOD ROOTING OF KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS CULTIVARS AND BLENDS. Dr. James B. Beard MSU

Whose Turf Are You Standing Turfgrass Species

Lawn Care for Disease Control

Maintaining a Healthy Lawn

Bahiagrass. Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flugge) Turf Questions Driving You. Cultivar Selection. Grows by rhizomes Grows in bunches Likes acidic soil

Spring Turf Care. Pedro Perdomo Nisso America, Inc. HGS March

Sprigging Bermudagrass

Diseases of Cool-Season Grasses

TURF - BROWN PATCH AND DOLLAR SPOT (APPLICATION INTERVAL: DAYS)

BMPs for Water Conservation in Turf. Dr. Charles H. Peacock NC State University

TRENDS. Spring bermudagrass dead spot is the most severe disease in the transition zone. Golfdom S PRACTICAL RESEARCH DIGEST FOR TURF MANAGERS TORO.

Chapter 1 - Lawn maintenance scheduling

Kurapia Groundcover. Installation and Care Manual. Kurapia [Phyla (Lippia) nodiflora (L.) E. Greene] is a low growing, herbaceous, perennial

Warm Season Turfgrasses for North Texas

Evaluation of Kentucky Bluegrass Cultivars J.B. Ross and M.A. Anderson

Project Report ROOT GROWTH DURING SOD TRANSPLANTING. Bingru Huang, Associate professor

Summer. Irrigation and Aeration on. Creeping Bentgrass Putting Greens

Mowing Height and Drought Effects on a Texas Bluegrass Hybrid Compared with Kentucky bluegrass

COVER SHEET. AUTHOR S NAME: Daniel Lloyd. MAJOR: Soil Science Agricultural Systems Production. DEPARTMENT: Soil Science. MENTOR: Doug Soldat

Effects of Phosphorus and Calcium on Tuber Set, Yield, and Quality in Goldrush Potato

Hollywood Management Guidelines

NORTH HARRIS COUNTY REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY STANDARD SPECIFICATION. Section SODDING

TRENDS. Acanopy is often thought of as the leafy. Turf Grass. The turfgrass canopy and its environment

SOIL TEST NOTES. Applying Lime to Established Lawns

Organically Managed Lands Program. Durango, CO. Chip Osborne Osborne Organics. Prepared by:

Getting the Most out of Your Strawberry Soil Test Report. General Information

Water Efficient Lawn Care for North Texas

TITLE: Promoting bee health and nutrition through flowering lawns. Research update, January 2018

Evaluation of Fiesta and liquid corn gluten meal for pre-emergent control of turfgrass weeds greenhouse and bare soil trial.

Don t Feed Your Lawn Now Don t Feed It!

Wear Tolerant Grasses for Use on Sports Fields in a Cold Climate D.K. Tompkins, M.A. Anderson and J.B. Ross

Sandy, low CEC, irrigated soil Acidic ph High ph Cold soils Soil low in P content or available P

Controlled Release Container Nursery Fertilizer Evaluations. Dr. James T. Midcap

Lawn Irrigation: How, When and Where to Water! Roger D. Havlak Extension Program Specialist- Turfgrass and Water Mgmt.

B /02. Lawn WATER MANAGEMENT

Management & Preparation of Lawn Bowling Greens in Adverse Weather Conditions

St. Augustinegrass - Made for the Florida Shade? 1

Grafting of Tomatoes for Soil-based Production in Greenhouse and High Tunnels Judson Reid, Kathryn Klotzbach and Nelson Hoover

INTRODUCTION ABG IN CBG WINTER KILL PHOTO ABG MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES 1/10/2014 POA ANNUA: LOVE IT, HATE IT, MANAGE IT DISEASE PHOTO

Master Gardener Recommended Horticulture Best Management Practices

Executive Sun Mix For the Executive look we all desire

4/7/2016. Turf Selection. Matt Elmore, Ph.D. Growth Habit. Bunch Type

A study of the plants produced by different methods of vegetative propagation in mango (cvs. Amrapali and Gopalbhog)

Vegetable Report 1 from Experiment Station, HARC December 1998

LEVELS OF SEED AND SOIL BORNE

Empire Turf Study Guide Maintenance Provider Exam

Pesticide-Free Lawn Care

EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS PLANTING. .02 Lawns and Grasses. A. General. 1. Intent:

Forcing Containerized Roses in a Retractable Roof Greenhouse and Outdoors in a Semi-Arid Climate

Production of Evergreen Shrubs in Paper Sludge- Amended Media. University of Idaho. Report Series: Final Report, January through July 2000

CULTIVATION PRACTICES FOR COMPACTED SOILS. J. A. Murphy and P. E. Rieke Crop and Soil Sciences, M.S.U.

Potatoes (2007) Potatoes Comparisons of Nitrogen Sources and Foliars (2008) Potatoes Nitrogen Types (2008) Potato Seed Piece Direct Fertilizer

CHAPTER 4. Annual Bluegrass and Creeping Bentgrass Competition Under Variable Irrigation Treatments. Abstract

fertilization: environmental impact

Irrigating Lawns When Water Supply is Reduced Howard Neibling, Extension Water Management Engineer, University of Idaho

2008 Iowa FFA Nursery/Landscape CDE General Knowledge Exam

TURF S UP: GROWING A HEALTHY LAWN IN PHOENIX DESERT LANDSCAPES

WHAT S UP WITH THE WEATHER THESE DAYS?

Waking Up Your Sleepy Lawn. Joe Clark Rutgers Plant Biology Pathology Dept. Research Farm Supervisor

POTATO VARIETY RESPONSE TO PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER

Selecting the Right Turf Varieties. Charles Schuster Extension Educator University of Maryland Extension

Urban Park Management Webinar Series

Retail Cost $ tax

TIMELY INFORMATION. Agriculture & Natural Resources DISEASE RESISTANCE AND SURVIVAL OF FLOWERING AND HYBRID DOGWOODS AT TWO LOCATIONS IN ALABAMA

Maximizing Dollar Spot Control Using Early Sprays and New Application Technology Causal Agent(s): Hosts / Occurrence: Symptoms/Signs:

City of Bowie Parks & Grounds. Best Practices to Green Your Lawn

Temperature and Dose influence Phoma macrostoma efficacy on seedling broadleaf weeds.

Low Maintenance Lawns. Sam Bauer Extension Educator- Turfgrass Science Earth Day 2015

Sam Angima OSU Extension Agent Newport Oregon

PHYTOPHTHORA ROOT AND RUNNER ROT OF CRANBERRY IN WISCONSIN- THE CURRENT SITUATION

Section 815. LANDSCAPING

Pull soil samples for regular soil test analysis to determine needs for maintaining ph and nutrient levels.

A FOUNDATION FOR GROWTH MICRONUTRIENT PROGRAM

Hawaii Agriculture Research Center -1- Vegetable Report 2. Hawaii Agriculture Research Center Vegetable Report 2 January 2000

Virginia Nutrient Management Standards and Criteria Revised July 2014

Transcription:

Golf Session 1Papers BENTGRASS (AGROSTIS SPP.) CULTIVAR CHARACTERIZATIONS FOR CLOSELY MOWED PUTTING GREENS IN A MEDITERRANEAN CLIMATE P. Croce l, M. MocionP,and J.B Beard 2 IFederazone Italiana Golf, 2International Sports Turf Institute This paper represents the final conclusions concerning the adaptation and performance of 17 bentgrass (Agrostis spp.) cultivars under the conditions of the study in Italy after 6 years of evaluation. This duration allows the turf-soil ecosystem to stabilize in terms of the soil physical characteristics, rooting, thatch, microorganism population, disease causing fungi, insect pests, and nematode populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS Establishment. Eleven commercially available cultivars of creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolon(fera) and one cultivar of Agrostis capillaris L. (Astoria colonial bentgrass) were planted onto a 6,456 sq. f1. (600 m 2 ) specially constructed experimental putting green located at the Torino Golf Club northeast of Torino, Italy. The plot size was 6.5 x 11.5 ft. (2.0 x 3.5 m), arranged in a randomized block design with 4 replications. In addition, 5 genotypes which at the time were advanced experimental selections of creeping bentgrass from Pennsylvania State University were planted in an adjacent area. These plots were 6.5 x 5.57 ft (2.0 x 1.75 m) in size, with 2 replications in a randomized block design. The root zone profile construction was a high-sand composition meeting Texas-USGA specifications, including a subsurface drainage system. The experimental area was planted on May 4, 1992. Preplant fertilization consisted of 2.0 lb per 1,000 sq f1.(1.0 kg 100 m- 2 ) each of N, P, and K incorporated into the upper 4 inches (100 mm) of the root zone. All cultivars were planted at a seeding rate of lib per 1,000 sq. ft. (0.5 kg 100 m- 2 ), with the seed lightly raked into the surface. Vertical barrier boards were used to avoid contamination of seed between plots. No lateral seed movement occurred and successful turfgrass establishment was achieved with distinct perimeters between individual cultivar plots. Cultural Practices. Cultural practices on the experimental putting green involved mowing 5 times per week in multiple directions at a 5 mm cutting height during 1992 thru 1994, and subsequently from 1995 thru 1997 at a cutting height of 5/32 inch (4 mm) by means of a triplex greensmower with a groomer attachment, with clippings removed. The nitrogen fertilization program consisted of 0.7 lb per 1,000 sq. ft. (0.35 kg 100 m- 2 ) per growing month from May through September, totaling 3.5 lb per 1,000 sq. ft. (1.75 kg 100 m- 2 ) annually in 1993 and 1994. The nitrogen fertility program was increased in 1995 through 1997 to 6lb per 1,000 sq. ft. (3 kg 100 m- 2 ) annually divided into 8 applications from March through October. The base phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) levels were applied as needed to maintain these nutrient levels in the high range based on an annual chemical soil test. The ph of the root zone was 6.8. Supplemental water was applied as needed to prevent visual wilt of the turf via gear driven, pop-up heads arranged in a tight spacing which sustained uniform moisture conditions across the experimental area. Topdressing was practiced at 2-month intervals during the growing season at a rate of O. 22 cubic yard per 1,000 sq. ft. (0.16 m 3 100 m- 2 ), using the same mix composition as the underlying root zone. No turf cultivation or vertical cutting was practiced on the turfed plots, to avoid interplot genotype contamination. Disease and insect problems were minimal, except for dollar spot (Sclerotinia homoeocarpa ET. Bennett) which was allowed to develop, with no fungicide applications made during the 1993 growing season. A modest preventive fungicide program has been followed since 1994. No insecticides or herbicides have been applied. All emerging weeds were manually removed during the 1992 growing season. Subsequently after the turfs had fully stabilized, weeds were allowed to develop across the experimental area. Assessments. Both turfgrass quality and morphological assessments were made. The turfgrass quality assessments involved visual estimates made by 2 EI.G. Green Section Agronomists at intervals throughout the growing season. The visual estimates were based on a composite of two primary components: uniformity of appearance and shoot density. The rating scale used was 9 = best and 1 = poorest. A rating of 5.5 or higher represented an acceptable quality putting surface. 109

Morphological assessments were made in September of each growing season. They consisted of actual shoot density counts conducted on a 2.5 square inch (1,600 mm 2 ) area of turf. Measurements of leaf width were based on a midpoint measurement of the second youngest leaf, with 10 leaves measured per replication. In addition, visual assessments were made of the comparative extent of moss and annual bluegrass invasion. All data were summarized at the end of each growing season and processed for statistical assessment involving the analyses of variance for the 12 older cultivars being separate from that for the 5 new cultivars. Any occurrences of disease or insect damage were noted, including identification of the causal organism. If the turf damage was sufficiently uniform across the plot area, assessments were made as to the percent of turf area damaged. This occurred only in 1993 and involved dollar spot disease (Sclerotinia homoeocarpa). These data were of a unique quality, such that they are presented in a separate F.I.G., Green Section Final Research Report No. 201 (2). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Turf2rass Quality. Visual estimates of turfgrass quality, although subjective, remain the best effective means of assessing the composite turfgrass quality at frequent intervals over a growing season. The primary components assessed are the shoot-leaf density, and the uniformity of leaf width, growth habit, and color. The specific color should be described and not judged as part of turfgrass quality in terms of a color preference. Turfgrass quality estimates above 5.5 indicate an acceptable quality putting green. The comparative seasonal means of visual turfgrass quality of 17 bentgrass cultivars maintained under closely mowed putting green conditions in a Mediterranean climate are shown in Table 1 for 1992 through 1997. Table 1. Comparative seasonal means o.f visual tlllfgrass quali(v o.f 17 bentgrass cultivars maintained under closely mowed putting green conditions in a Mediterranean climate. Genotype Turfgrass Quality Annual Seasonal Means (9-best; I-poorest) 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Providence 7.25 6.13 6.25 6.69 7.22 7.l0a Penneagle 6.87 6.42 6.38 6.54 7.18 6.91 a Southshore 6.38 6.49 6.81 7.18 6.86a PennLinks 7.01 6.15 5.88 6.45 6.99 6.57 a Penncross 7.11 5.76 5.78 6.29 6.99 6048 a SR 1020 6.70 5.03 5.19 6.57 6.57 6.37 ab Cobra 6.81 5.W 5.73 6.22 6.56 6.31 ab Putter 7.15 6.15 5.89 6.40 6.69 6.29ab National 6.31 4.85 4.91 5.61 6.16 5.36 bc Emerald 6.39 4.20 4.53 5.43 5.72 4.75c Seaside 5.18 3.41 3.87 4.58 4.38 3.61 d Astoria 4.35 3.50 3.48 3.80 2.79 2.80d LSDvalue* 0.61 0.47 0.78 0.53 0.39 1.05 mean 6.46 5.30 5.37 5.95 6.20 5.78 PennG-l 7.48 7.22 6.89 7.13 8.10 7.95 a Penn A-I 7.46 7.37 6.65 6.73 8.06 7.87 a PennG-67 7.34 6.72 6.80 6.94 7.38 7.54ab Penn G- 2 6.80 6.54 6.54 7.33 7.86 7040 ab' Seaside II 6.39 5.75 5.46 6.23 6.90 7.04 b LSD value** 0.75 0.48 0.88 0.52 0.42 0.68 mean* 7.10 6.72 6.47 6.87 7.fKJ 7.56 * To determine the statistical differences among the above 12 cultivars, subtract one cultivar's mean from another cultivar's mean; a statistically significant difference occurs when this value is larger than the corresponding LSD value (LSD 0.05). ** To determine the statistical differences among the above 5 cultivars, follow the procedure described in (*). 110

After five full years being maintained under closely maintained putting green conditions the turfgrass quality ranged from 7.95 down to 2.80. Ranking highest of the older cultivars in visual turfgrass quality after 5+ years were Providence, Penneagle, Southshore, PennLinks, and Penncross, with SR 1020, Cobra and Putter not being significantly different. Ranking inferior and unacceptable as a putting green surface after 5+ years were Emerald, Seaside and Astoria. Among the newer Penn series, the 0-1, A-I, 0-6 and 0-2 all had turfgrass quality values ranking higher than Providence at the end of 5+ growing seasons. The individual seasonal means varied from year-to-year, due to the int1uence of seasonal variations in climate. It should be noted that no control of dollar spot was practiced during the 1993 season and the height of cut was lowered from 3/16 to 5/32 inch (4.8-4.0 mm) at the start of 1995. Shoot Densitv. The comparative shoot densities of 17 bentgrass cultivars maintained under closely mowed putting green conditions in a Mediterranean climate are shown in Table 2 for 1993 through 1997. The shoot densities of the 13 most dense cultivars ranged from 1,522 to 3,003 shoots per square decimeter in 1997, a 2 fold differential. There was a decrease in shoot density from 1993 to 1994, except for Astoria and Seaside. This was most probably the result of a very modest fertilization program. The fertilization rate was adjusted upward in 1995, along with a lowering of the cutting height from 3/16 to 5/32 (4.8-4.0 mm). Subsequently from 1995 through 1997 the shoot density for most cultivars increased, with a few exceptions over the 3 years. Ranking highest in shoot density among the older turfgrass cultivars after 5+ years were PennLinks, Providence, and Southshore, with SR 1020, Cobra and Putter not being significantly different. All the newer Penn series cultivars were higher in shoot density after 5+ years. The newer bentgrass cultivars sustained very high shoot densities under a close mowing height, which can be a positive from a quality playing surt'ace standpoint. However, they may require new approaches in terms of cultural practices such as weekly turf cultivation by means of closely spaced, 1,4 inch (6.4 mm) diameter, solid tines, plus periodic vertical cutting to properly manage the canopy biomass. Table 2. Comparative annllal shoot density counts of 17 bentgrass cultivars maintained under close!.v mowed putting green conditions in a Mediterranean climate. Cultivar PennLinks Providence Southshore SR 1020 Shoot Density Count (shoots per square decimeter) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1,504 1,301 1,553 1,793 2,186a 1,425 1,093 1,395 1,799 2,080 a 1,500 1,126 1,692 2,040 2,037 a 1,419 1,204 1,523 1,799 1,876 ab Cobra Putter Penncross Penneagle National Astoria Seaside Emerald LSDvalue* mean 1,195 1,CXn 1,363 1,521 1,272 1,093 1,356 1,681 1,022 987 1,358 1,642 1,240 1,088 1,383 1,651 1,013 759 1,156 1,320 835 943 1,048 1,307 755 765 1,020 1,268 1,010 796 1,172 1,212 224 174 214 354 1,183 1,014 1,335 1,587 1,873 ab 1,814 ab 1,631 b 1,522 b 376 1.877 Penn 0-6 2,378 1,306 2,700 2,662 3,003 a Penn A-I 2,240 1,540 2,325 2,656 2,868 a Penn 0-2 2,546 1,793 2,366 2,225 2,725 a Penn 0-1 2,612 1,902 2,228 2,912 2,675 a Seaside II 2,053 1,300 1,475 2,762 2,550 a LSD value** 650 259 538 534 1,333 mean 2,366 1,570 2,219 2,643 2,764 * To determine the statistical differences among the above 12 cultivars, subtract one cultivar's mean from another cultivar's mean; a statistically significant difference occurs when this value is larger than the corresponding LSD value (LSD 0.05). ** To determine the statistical differences among the above 5 cultivars, follow the procedure described in (*). 111

Leaf Blade Width. The comparative leaf blade width measurements of 17 bentgrass cultivars maintained under closely mowed putting green conditions in a MeditelTanean climate are shown in Table 3 for 1993 through 1996. In 1996 the leaf blade widths among the 17 cultivars ranged from 0.62 to 0.92 mm. The most narrow leaf blade widths were found among the Penn series cultivars, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 mm. These 5 cultivars also possessed the highest shoot densities. This contrasts with the older bentgrass cultivars where only SR 1020 and Southshore were under 0.75 mm, with the remainder being wider than 0.81 mm. Table 3. Comparative annual leaf blade }1'idthmeasurements of 17 bentgrass cultivars maintained under closely mol1'edpllfting green conditions in a Mediterranean climate. Cultivar Turfgrass Leaf Blade Width (mm) 1993 1994 1995 1996 SR 1020 0.84 0.80 0.77 0.73 a Southshore 0.84 0.84 0.77 0.74 a Providence 0.% 0.85 0.87 0.81 ab Putter 0.94 0.86 0.78 0.82 abc Penncross 0.89 0.85 0.83 0.85 bc PennLinks 0.93 0.80 0.81 0.85 bc Penneagle 0.95 0.% 0.86 0.87 bc Seaside 0.% 0.90 0.97 0.87 bc Cobra 0.93 0.88 0.88 0.89 bc Astoria 0.% 0.85 0.86 0.90 bc National 0.94 0.90 0.85 0.91 c Emerald 0.95 0.% 0.88 0.92 c LSD value* 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 mean 0.92 0.87 0.84 0.85 Seaside II 0.76 0.79 0.79 0.62 a PennG-6 0.73 0.70 0.62 0.63 a PennG-2 0.73 0.63 0.70 0.66 a Penn A-I 0.75 0.70 0.68 0.67 a Penn G-l 0.69 0.72 0.69 0.69 a LSD value** 0.18 0.16 0.13 0.08 mean 0.73 0.71 0.70 0.65 * To determine the statistical differences among the above 12 cultivars, subtract one cultivar's mean from another cultivar's mean; a statistically significant difference occurs when this value is larger than the corresponding LSD value (LSD 0.05). ** To determine the statistical differences among the above 5 cultivars, follow the procedure described in (*). Annual Bluegrass Invasion. The comparative annual bluegrass invasions among 17 bentgrass cultivars maintained under closely mowed putting green conditions in a Mediterranean climate are shown in Table 4 for the third through fifth years of the study. The older bentgrass cultivars can be aligned in three groups in terms of the extent of annual bentgrass invasion, with Southshore, PennLinks, Providence, SR 1020 and Penneagle exhibiting the least annual bluegrass invasion, with Penncross, Putter, and Cobra being intermediate after 5+ years. National, Emerald, Seaside and Astoria exhibited the greatest annual bluegrass invasion, being 12.5, 17.5,35, and 50%, respectively, after 5+ growing seasons. Ranking lowest in annual bluegrass invasion as a group were the Penn series, which also possessed the highest shoot densities. Generally, those cultivars with higher shoot densities exhibited the least proneness to annual bluegrass invasion. Over the third through fifth years the amount of annual bluegrass tended to increase for most of the bentgrass cultivars. 112

Table 4. Comparative annual bluegrass invasion estimates of 12 bentgrass cultivars maintained under closel.v mowed putting green conditions in a Mediterranean climate. CuItivars Percent of Turf Cover as Annual Bluegrass 1995 1996 1997 Southshore 0.8 2.5 2.0a PennLinks 2.0 4.3 2.8a Providence 1.5 2.8 3.0a SR-I020 1.0 2.0 3.5a Penneagle 0.5 2.0 3.5a Penncross 2.3 5.3 7.0ab Putter 3.0 3.8 7.7ab Cobra 4.8 5.3 8.0ab National 3.3 6.8 12.5 bc Emerald 4.0 10.0 17.5c Seaside 9.3 20.0 35.0d Astoria 15.0 41.3 50.0e LSD value* 3.76 5.89 8.47 mean 4.0 8.8 12.7 Penn G-I 0.5 1.0 1.2 a Penn A-I 1.0 1.0 1.3 a Penn G-6 0.0 1.0 1.3 a Penn G-2 0.5 1.0 1.8 ab Seaside II 3.0 3.0 2.1 b LSD value** 0.70 0.66 0.70 mean 1.0 1.4 1.5 * To determine the statistical differences among the above 12 cultivars, subtract one cultivar's mean from another cultivar's mean; a statistically significant difference occurs when this value is larger than the corresponding LSD value (LSD 0.05). ** To determine the statistical differences among the above 5 cultivars, follow the procedure described in (*). Moss Invasion. The comparative moss invasion among 17 bentgrass cultivars maintained under closely mowed putting green conditions in a Mediterranean climate are shown in Table 5 for the third through fifth years of the study. Generally bentgrass cultivars with a high shoot density had the lowest moss invasion, while those with the lowest shoot densities had the highest moss invasion. It also can be noted that the extent of moss invasion varied from year-to-year within individual cultivars. There were no distinct trends across the cultivars as a whole. Generally, the greatest moss invasion occurred in June in most years. The cultivars that were particularly prone to moss invasion included National, Penncross, Emerald, Seaside, and Astoria. In contrast, the new cultivars Penn G-6, Penn G-I, and Penn G-2 were characterized by a moss invasion of less than 10% in all 3 years. 113

Table 5. Comparative moss invasion estimates of 17 bentgrass cultivars in June maintained under closely mowed putting green conditions in a Mediterranean climate. Cultivars Percent of Turf Cover as Moss 1994 1995 1996 mean Providence 3.3 8.8 10.0 7.4 SR-I020 6.0 10.0 9.3 8.4 Penneagle 7.0 13.0 7.5 9.3 Putter 7.3 10.5 10.0 9.3 Southshore 5.3 9.8 15.5 10.2 PennLinks 10.0 9.3 16.8 12.2 Cobra 11.7 11.8 17.5 13.7 National 16.7 18.8 12.5 16.0 Penncross 13.3 20.0 15.0 16.1 Emerald 26.7 21.3 16.3 21.4 Seaside 30.0 26.3 18.9 25.1 Astoria 54.0 27.5 35.0 38.8 LSD value* 13.06 8.77 8.54 mean 15.9 15.6 15.4 Penn G-6 2.5 5.0 4.0 3.8 Penn G-l 1.0 9.0 4.0 4.7 Penn G-2 2.5 7.5 7.5 5.8 Penn A-I 2.5 13.5 2.5 6.2 Seaside II 6.5 15.0 9.0 10.2 LSD value** 3.35 5.54 3.ffi mean 3.0 10.0 5.4 * To determine the statistical differences among the above 12 cultivars, subtract one cultivar's mean from another cultivar's mean; a statistically significant difference occurs when this value is larger than the corresponding LSD value (LSD 0.05). ** To determine the statistical differences among the above 5 cultivars, follow the procedure described in (*). References 1. Beard, J.B. 1982. Tlll:fManagementforGoIfCourses. Macmillan Company, New York, N.Y., USA. 642 pp. 2. Croce, P., M. Mocioni, Y.M. Pich, and J. B Beard. 1993. Comparative dollar spot susceptibility of seventeen bentgrass (Agrostis spp.) cultivars under putting green conditions. Federazione Italiana Golf, Green Section - Final Research Report No. 201. 4 pp. 3. Croce, P., M. Mocioni, V.M. Pich, and J. B Beard. 1994. Bentgrass (Agrostis spp.) cultivar characteristics for 1993 under closely mowed putting green conditions near Torino, Italy. Federazione Italiana Golf, Green Section- Research Progress Report No. 301. 9 pp. 114