User s Manual. YTA110, YTA310, YTA320, and YTA710 Temperature Transmitters. Manual Change No

Similar documents
SIL Safety Guide Series MS Single-Acting Spring-Return Hydraulic Linear Actuators

100 & 120 Series Pressure and Temperature Switches Safety Manual

Digital EPIC 2 Safety manual

STT850 and STT750 SmartLine Temperature Transmitter HART Communications Options Safety Manual 34-TT Revision 4 September 2017

United Electric Controls One Series Safety Transmitter Safety Manual

Overfill Prevention Control Unit with Ground Verification & Vehicle Identification Options. TÜVRheinland

SLG 700 SmartLine Level Transmitters Guided Wave Radar Safety Manual 34-SL Revision 4.0 December 2017

Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostic Analysis

Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostic Analysis

SAFETY MANUAL. Electrochemical Gas Detector GT3000 Series Includes Transmitter (GTX) with H 2 S or O 2 Sensor Module (GTS)

SAFETY MANUAL. PointWatch Eclipse Infrared Hydrocarbon Gas Detector Safety Certified Model PIRECL

Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostic Analysis

Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostic Analysis

Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostic Analysis. Rosemount Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota USA

Certification Report of the ST3000 Pressure Transmitter

Certification Report of the ST 3000 Pressure Transmitter with HART 6

Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostic Analysis

Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostic Analysis. Rosemount Inc. Chanhassen, MN USA

Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostic Analysis

Rosemount Functional Safety Manual. Manual Supplement , Rev AF March 2015

SAFETY CERTIFIED MODEL FP-700 COMBUSTIBLE GAS DETECTOR

FUNCTIONAL SAFETY IN FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM E-BOOK

Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostic Analysis

Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostic Analysis

SAFETY MANUAL. Multispectrum IR Flame Detector X3301

Introduction. Additional information. Additional instructions for IEC compliant devices. Measurement made easy

Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostic Analysis

Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostic Analysis

SITRANS. Temperature transmitter Functional safety for SITRANS TW. Introduction. General safety instructions 2. Device-specific safety instructions

Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostic Analysis

SAFETY MANUAL. X2200 UV, X9800 IR, X5200 UVIR SIL 2 Certified Flame Detectors

Rosemount 2140:SIS Level Detector

FMEDA Report. Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostic Analysis. KFD0-CS-Ex*.54* and KFD0-CS-Ex*.56* Project: X7300

Mobrey Magnetic Level Switches

PPA Michaël GROSSI - FSCE PR electronics

Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostic Analysis

Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostic Analysis

Safety Instrumented Systems The Smart Approach

Safety Transmitter / Logic Solver Hybrids. Standards Certification Education & Training Publishing Conferences & Exhibits

IEC61511 Standard Overview

Functional Safety Solutions

Assessment of the Safety Integrity of Electrical Protection Systems in the Petrochemical Industry

Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostic Analysis

HAWK Measurement Systems Pty. Ltd. Centurion CGR Series Safety Manual

Smarter Field Instrumentation Life Cycle Management. Ray Rogowski Global Marketing PMC Instruments

Soliphant M with electronic insert FEM52

IEC Functional Safety Assessment

Process Safety - Market Requirements. V.P.Raman Mott MacDonald Pvt. Ltd.

New Developments in the IEC61511 Edition 2

Implementing Safety Instrumented Burner Management Systems: Challenges and Opportunities

Proservo NMS5- / NMS7-

FUNCTIONAL SAFETY MANUAL. Gassonic Observer-H and Observer-i Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detector

Safety Manual. Eagle Quantum Premier SIL 2 Rated Fire & Gas System. 7.2 Rev: 8/

New requirements for IEC best practice compliance

Measurement of Safety Integrity of E/E/PES according to IEC61508

Safety Manual. XNX TM Universal Transmitter. Table of Contents SIL 2 Certificates Overview Safety Parameters

FUNCTIONAL SAFETY MANUAL

Functional Safety of Machinery: EN ISO Stewart Robinson. Overview of the presentation. References. TÜV SÜD Product Service

67 th Canadian Chemical Engineering Conference EDMONTON, AB OCTOBER 22-25, 2017

Changes in IEC Ed 2

User s Manual YTA610 and YTA710 NEPSI Certification

ACCURATE FAILURE METRICS FOR MECHANICAL INSTRUMENTS IN SAFETY APPLICATIONS

Pressure Transmitter cerabar M PMC 41/45 cerabar M PMP 41/45/46/48 with Output Signal ma/hart

Technical Paper. Functional Safety Update IEC Edition 2 Standards Update

Failure Rate Data, Safety System Modeling Concepts, and Fire & Gas Systems Moderator: Lori Dearman, Webinar Producer Thursday, May 16th, 2013

Safety Instrumented Systems

Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostic Analysis. PR electronics A/S Rønde Denmark

USER APPROVAL OF SAFETY INSTRUMENTED SYSTEM DEVICES

Functional Safety Manual Oil Leak Detector NAR300 System

Temperature Solutions Line Card

Safety Instrumented Systems Overview and Awareness. Workbook and Study Guide

Safety Manual. Eagle Quantum Premier SIL 2 Rated Fire & Gas System. 9.1 Rev: 9/

Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostic Analysis

The evolution of level switches and detectors

Deltapilot S FMB70. Functional Safety Manual. Level and Pressure Measurement with Output Signal ma

430128A. B-Series Flow Meter SIL Safety Manual

Safety Integrity Verification and Validation of a High Integrity Pressure Protection System to IEC 61511

FUNCTIONAL SAFETY CERTIFICATE

ProcessMaster FEP300, FEP500 HygienicMaster FEH300, FEH500 Electromagnetic Flowmeter

Integrated but separate

FMEDA and Proven-in-use Assessment. Pepperl+Fuchs GmbH Mannheim Germany

Australian Standard. Functional safety Safety instrumented systems for the process industry sector

SAFETY MANUAL. Intelligent Sensors for H 2 S Gas Applications

Addressing Challenges in HIPPS Design and Implementation

InstrumentationTools.com

Meridian wiredhart. HART Field Device Specification Goldmine Rd. Monroe, NC USA

Topic MYTH FUNCTIONAL SAFETY IMPLIES HAVING A SIL RATED COMPONENT. Presented by : Arunkumar A

Technical Report Proven In Use SITRANS P500

Rosemount 2088, 2090P, and 2090F Pressure Transmitters

SAFETY MANUAL. FL4000H and FL4000 Multi-Spectral Infrared Flame Detectors

Safety in the process industry

Automation, Software und Informationstechnologie

FUNCTIONAL SAFETY MANUAL

Why AC800M High Integrity is used in Burner Management System Applications?

SIPART. Electropneumatic positioner Functional safety for SIPART PS2. Introduction. General safety instructions 2. Device-specific safety instructions

ADIPEC 2013 Technical Conference Manuscript

FlameGard 5 UV/IR HART

Functional Safety of Machinery Presented by Greg Richards Manufacturing in America 02/22-23/2017

FUNCTIONAL SAFETY OF ELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS IN INDUSTRIAL PLANTS BY OTTO WALCH

SECTION Fluorescent Dissolved Oxygen Measuring System

Transcription:

User s Manual YTA110, YTA310, YTA320, and YTA710 Temperature Transmitters Manual Change No. 16-045 Please use this manual change for the manuals listed below. 1. Applicable manuals, revised item, revised contents DOC No. Edition Page Revised Items IM 01C50B01-01E 16th 7-1 7-3 7-4 IM 01C50G01-01EN 1st 3-4 7-4 IM 01C50T01-01E 5th 3-5 3-15 Input signal Table 7.1 Input Type, Measurement Range and Accuracy Table 7.3 YTA310, YTA320 Effect of Ambient Temperature Table 3.4 Parameter List (HART) Table 7.1 Sensor type, measurement range, and accuracy Figure Table 3.2 Revised Contents 1st 3-11 Figure 3.1 Wire connection and sensor type IM 01C50T02-01E 9th 5-12 5-14 9-3 9-4 IM 01C50T02-02EN 1st 6-2 6-3 6-4 IM 01C50T03-01E 5th 3-4 3-5 3-13 5-1 5-2 SENSOR_TYPE_1(2) Table 5.16 Recommended Input Levels for Calibration Table 9.1 Accuracy Table 9.2 Ambient Temperature Effect SENSOR_TYPE_1(2) Figure 6.2 Wire connection and sensor type Table 6.1 Sensor type and measurement range Sensor type selection Figure 3.1 Input terminal wire connection diagram and sensor type categories Setting display Table 3.1 Zero and Gain point value for Sensor trim 5. LIST OF PARAMETERS SENSOR1 TYPE 5. LIST OF PARAMETERS SENSOR2 TYPE 2. Note Please do not use Ni120 sensor. Sep. 14, 2016

User s Manual YTA710 Temperature Transmitter (HART Protocol) Manual Change No. 16-039 SIL certification specification is added for YTA710 temperature transmitter. Please use this manual change with the user s manual below. 1. Applicable User s Manual (1st) 2. Items to be changed CONTENTS: Add below after 5. Parameter Lists. Appendix A. Safety Instrumented Systems Installation........ A-1 A.1 Scope and Purpose........................... A-1 A.2 Using the YTA for an SIS Application............ A-1 A.2.1 Safety Accuracy................................ A-1 A.2.2 Diagnostic Response Time........................ A-1 A.2.3 Setup........................................ A-1 A.2.4 Required Parameter Settings...................... A-1 A.2.5 Proof Testing.................................. A-2 A.2.6 Repair and Replacement......................... A-3 A.2.7 Startup Time................................... A-3 A.2.8 Firmware Update............................... A-3 A.2.9 Reliability Data................................. A-3 A.2.10 Lifetime Limits................................. A-3 A.2.11 Environmental Limits............................ A-3 A.2.12 Application Limits............................... A-3 A.3 Terms and Definitions......................... A-3 3. Items to be added Add Appendix A. Sep. 28, 2016

<Appendix A. Safety Instrumented Systems Installation> A-1 Appendix A. Safety Instrumented Systems Installation WARNING The contents of this appendix are cited from exida. com safety manual on the YTA series temperature transmitters specifically observed for the safety transmitter purpose. When using the YTA for Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS) application, the instructions and procedures in this section must be strictly followed in order to preserve the transmitter for that safety level. A.1 Scope and Purpose This section provides an overview of the user responsibilities for installation and operation of the YTA in order to maintain the designed safety level for Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS) applications. Items that will be addressed are proof testing, repair and replacement of the transmitter, reliability data, lifetime, environmental and application limits, and parameter settings. A.2 Using the YTA for an SIS Application A.2.1 Safety Accuracy The YTA has a specified safety accuracy of 2%. This means that the internal component failures are listed in the device failure rate if they will cause an error of 2% or greater. A.2.2 Diagnostic Response Time Diagnostic response time of the YTA is less than 60 seconds and will report an internal failure within 2 seconds of the fault occurrence. A.2.3 Setup Set the ranges and units by the HART configuration toll. After configuration, make sure that the ranges and units are set correctly. The calibration of the YTA must be performed after parameters are set. A.2.4 Required Parameter Settings The following parameters need to be set in order to maintain the designed safety integrity. Table A.1.1 describes the setting of the hardware error burnout and hardware write protect switch. Table A.1.2 describes the parameter setting by software. Table A.1.1 Item Hardware error burnout direction switch Write protect switch Table A.1.2 Item Sensor type setting Sensor burnout setting Required setting of hardware error burnout and hardware write protect switch Description To specify if the output should go to 21.6 ma or higher or 3.2 ma or lower upon detection of an internal failure. The write function disabled. Parameters to be set by software Description In case of 2 inputs specification, set the type of sensor2 to Non Connection. To specify if the output should go to 21.6 ma or higher or 3.6 ma or lower upon detection of an sensor failure.

<Appendix A. Safety Instrumented Systems Installation> A-2 A.2.5 Proof Testing The objective of proof testing is to detect failures within the transmitter that are not detected by the diagnostics of the transmitter. Of main concern are undetected failures that prevent the safety instrumented function from performing its intended function. See table A.2 for proof testing method. The frequency of the proof tests (or the proof test interval) is to be determined in the reliability calculations for the safety instrumented functions for which the YTA is applied. The actual proof tests must be performed more frequently or as frequently as specified in the calculation in order to maintain required safety integrity of the safety instrumented function. The following tests need to be specifically executed when a proof test is performed. The results of the proof test need to be documented and this documentation should be part of a plant safety management system. Failures that are detected should be reported to Yokogawa. The personnel performing the proof test of the transmitter should be trained in SIS operations including bypass procedures, YTA temperature transmitter maintenance, and company management of change procedures. Table A.2 Proof Testing Testing method Tools required Expected outcome Remarks Analog Output Loop Test: Handheld terminal Proof Test Coverage * 1. Bypass the safety PLC or take other appropriate action to avoid a false trip. 2. Send a HART command to the transmitter to go to the high alarm current output and verify that the analog current reaches that value. 3. Send a HART command to the transmitter to go to the low alarm current output and verify that the analog current reaches that value. 4. Use the HART communicator to view detailed device status to ensure no alarms or warnings are present in the transmitter. 5. Perform reasonability check on the sensor value(s) versus an independent estimate (i.e. from direct monitoring of BPCS value) to show current reading is good. 6. Restore the loop to full operation. 7. Remove the bypass from the safety PLC or otherwise restore normal operation. Analog Output Loop Test and Temperature Spot Check: 1. Bypass the safety PLC or take other appropriate action to avoid a false trip. 2. Perform Analog Output Loop Test. 3. Verify the measurement for two temperature points. 4. Perform reasonability check of the housing temperature. 5. Restore the loop to full operation. 6. Remove the bypass from the safety PLC or otherwise restore normal operation. for TC input: 61% for RTD input: 69% Handheld terminal Proof Test Coverage * *: For details of the proof test coverage, refer to the FMEDA No. YEC 15/10-041 R001. Website address: http://www.yokogawa.com/fld/ for TC input: 86% for RTD input: 86% The output needs to be monitored to assure that the transmitter communicates the correct signal. The output needs to be monitored to assure that the transmitter communicates the correct signal.

<Appendix A. Safety Instrumented Systems Installation> A-3 A.2.6 Repair and Replacement If repair is to be performed with the process online, the YTA will need to be bypassed during the repair. The user should setup appropriate bypass procedures. In the unlikely event that the YTA has a failure, the failures that are detected should be reported to Yokogawa. When replacing the YTA, the procedure in the installation manual should be followed. The personnel performing the repair or replacement of the YTA should have a sufficient skill level. A.2.7 Startup Time The YTA generates a valid signal within 6 seconds of power-on startup. A.2.8 Firmware Update In case firmware updates are required, they will be performed at factory. The replacement responsibilities are then in place. The user will not be required to perform any firmware updates. A.2.9 Reliability Data A detailed Failure Mode, Effects, and Diagnostics Analysis (FMEDA) report is available from Yokogawa with all failure rates and failure modes. The YTA is certified up to SIL2 for use in a simplex (1oo1) configuration, depending on the PFDavg respectively PFH calculation of the entire Safety Instrumented Function. The development process of the YTA is certified up to SIL3, allowing redundant use of the transmitter up to this Safety Integrity Level, depending the PFDavg respectively PFH calculation of the entire Safety Instrumented Function. When using the transmitter in a redundant configuration, the use of a common cause factor (β-factor) of 5% is suggested. If the owner-operator of the plant would institute common cause failure training and more detailed maintenance procedures for avoiding common cause failure, a beta factor of 2% would be applicable. *: For details of the PFDavg, please refer to the FMEDA No. YEC 15/10-041 R001. Website address: http://www.yokogawa.com/fld/ A.2.10 Lifetime Limits The expected lifetime of the YTA is 50 years. The reliability data listed in the FMEDA report is only valid for this period. The failure rates of the YTA may increase sometime after this period. Reliability calculations based on the data listed in the FMEDA report for YTA lifetimes beyond 50 years may yield results that are too optimistic, i.e. the calculated Safety Integrity Level will not be achieved. A.2.11 Environmental Limits The environmental limits of the YTA are specified in the user s manual IM 01C50G01-01EN. A.2.12 Application Limits The application limits of the YTA are specified in the user s manual IM 01C50G01-01EN. If the transmitter is used outside of the application limits, the reliability data listed in A.2.9 becomes invalid. A.3 Terms and Definitions FMEDA Failure Mode Effect and Diagnostic Analysis SIF Safety Instrumented Function SIL Safety Integrity Level SIS Safety Instrumented System - Implementation of one or more Safety Instrumented Functions. A SIS is composed of any combination of sensor(s), logic solver(s), and final element(s). SLC Safety Lifecycle Safety Freedom from unacceptable risk of harm Functional Safety The ability of a system to carry out the actions necessary to achieve or to maintain a defined safe state for the equipment / machinery / plant / apparatus under control of the system Basic Safety The equipment must be designed and manufactured such that it protects against risk of damage to persons by electrical shock and other hazards and against resulting fire and explosion. The protection must be effective under all conditions of the nominal operation and under single fault condition

Verification The demonstration for each phase of the life-cycle that the (output) deliverables of the phase meet the objectives and requirements specified by the inputs to the phase. The verification is usually executed by analysis and / or testing Validation The demonstration that the safetyrelated system(s) or the combination of safety-related system(s) and external risk reduction facilities meet, in all respects, the Safety Requirements Specification. The validation is usually executed by testing. Safety Assessment The investigation to arrive at a judgment - based on evidence - of the safety achieved by safety-related systems Further definitions of terms used for safety techniques and measures and the description of safety related systems are given in IEC 61508-4. <Appendix A. Safety Instrumented Systems Installation> A-4