Evaluation of new low- and moderate-chill peach cultivars in coastal southern California

Similar documents
Cling Peach ANNUAL REPORT 2006 EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR TOLERANCE TO BACTERIAL CANKER AND ORCHARD REPLANT CONDITIONS.

UC Agriculture & Natural Resources California Agriculture

Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station

Tim Smith; Dana Faubion and Dr. William Proebsting,

2009 NC-140 Peach Rootstock Trial in Massachusetts

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums 1

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums 1

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums 1

Screening and Evaluation of New Rootstocks with Resistance to Phytophthora cinnamomi

Deciduous Fruit Trees Fall & Winter Care

FRUIT TREES: CARE AND MAINTENANCE ~ WINTER AND SUMMER PRUNING Charles Davis & Kim McCue, UC Master Gardeners

Selecting Fruit Trees for Alameda

The Italian Plum Rootstock Trial: Results for Sicilian Environmental Conditions

FRUIT TREES: CARE AND MAINTENANCE ~ WINTER AND SUMMER PRUNING Charles Davis and Kim McCue, UC Master Gardeners

Apple Rootstock Trials in British Columbia, Canada

GROWTH AND PERFORMANCE OF OWN-ROOTED CHANDLER AND VINA COMPARED TO PARADOX ROOTED TREES

California Cling Peach Board ANNUAL REPORT-2010 IMPROVED ROOTSTOCKS FOR PEACH AND NECTARINE. Ted DeJong, Professor, University of California, Davis.

Evaluation of grafting for the mature green tomato production system

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums1

EVALUATION OF NEW USDA ADVANCED FIRE BLIGHT-RESISTANT PEAR SELECTIONS

Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station

FOOTHILL FARM AND ORCHARD NEWS ISSUE #8 APRIL, 2006

Effect of Fruit Crop Load on Peach Root Growth

Walnut Marketing Board Final Project Report December Project Title: Irrigation Management and the Incidence of Kernel Mold in Walnut

3. M9 NIC29 A virus-free Belgian subclone of M9 that is slightly more vigorous than most others M9 clones.

Pumpkin Cultivar Performance Trial Grown in Southern Ohio 2018

Performance of Different Tomato Genotypes in the Arid Tropics of Sudan during the Summer Season. II. Generative Development

One Shields Avenue Madera CA Davis CA USA

EFFECT OF INDOLEBUTYRIC ACID (IBA) AND PLANTING TIMES ON THE GROWTH AND ROOTING OF PEACH CUTTINGS

The introduction of dwarfing cherry rootstocks, such as

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Research Service Washington, D.C

Elvenia J. Slosson Endowment. Evaluation of Southern Highbush and Rabbiteye Blueberries for Southern California Progress Report for

TIMELY INFORMATION. Agriculture & Natural Resources DISEASE RESISTANCE AND SURVIVAL OF FLOWERING AND HYBRID DOGWOODS AT TWO LOCATIONS IN ALABAMA

Tree growth over multiple years

Research Article IJAER (2017);

Chemical Blossom Thinning of Peaches and Nectarines 1997 CTFA Report

FIELD TRIALS FOR RESISTANCE TO PHYTOPHTHORA ROOT ROT

East Malling Rootstock Club. Felicidad Fernández AHDB Tree Fruit Day 22 Feb 2018

Peach Rootstock Trials Jim Schupp PSU-FREC

Evaluation of the Fair Oaks Horticulture Center and its Educational Programs

Rootstock Options for the southern Sac Valley. Kat Pope Orchard Advisor, Sac-Solano-Yolo Feb 3 rd, 2016

EVALUATION OF SIZE CONTROLLING ROOTSTOCKS FOR CALIFORNIA PEACH, PLUM AND NECTARINE PRODUCTION

Bacterial Canker Susceptibility of Peach:Almond Hybrid Rootstocks for California Stonefruit Orchards

Vegetable Report 1 from Experiment Station, HARC December 1998

Comparison of Field Seeding of Sugar Beets and Mangel Wurzels with Two Methods of Transplanting 1

Hawaii Agriculture Research Center -1- Vegetable Report 2. Hawaii Agriculture Research Center Vegetable Report 2 January 2000

Introduction. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences North Florida Research and Education Center Suwannee Valley

EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR PISTACHIO PRODUCTION

VENTURA COUNTY AVOCADO ROOT ROT RESISTANCE PLOT

Comparison Blackberry Production Under High Tunnels and Field Conditions. High Tunnels

Documentation of field and postharvest performance for a mature collection of quince (Cydonia oblonga) varieties in Imathia, Greece

Developing integrated control tactics for cole crop pests. Final report, 13 February 2008

A study of the plants produced by different methods of vegetative propagation in mango (cvs. Amrapali and Gopalbhog)

INFLUENCE OF GLASSHOUSE CONDITIONS ON FLOWER BEHAVIOR OF HASS AND ANAHEIM AVOCADOS

AVOCADO INARCH GRAFTING TRIALS WITH ROOT ROT RESISTANT VARIETIES

Effect of Rootstocks on Growth and Yield of Carmen Sweet Cherry

The primary reasons for pruning apple trees are to control

Nursery Tree Specifications & Tree Types Description

East Malling Rootstock Club Policy Group meeting 15th September 2017

Final Report for Slosson Foundation. Trap Cropping for Management of Root-knot Nematode in Home Gardens

New Arkansas Blackberry Production Characteristics

NOTICE TO FRUIT GROWERS AND NURSERYMEN RELATIVE TO THE NAMING AND RELEASE OF THE US-942 CITRUS ROOTSTOCK

Effects of budding time on success and sapling growth in almond on Erzincan conditions

Selection of Clonal Avocado Rootstocks in Israel for High Productivity under Different Soil Conditions

Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station

DORMANCY, CHILL ACCUMULATION, REST-BREAKING AND FREEZE DAMAGE what are the risks?

FIRST YEAR RECOVERY FOLLOWING A SIMULATED DROUGHT IN WALNUT. D. A. Goldhamer, R. Beede, S. Sibbett, D. Ramos, D. Katayama, S. Fusi, and R.

Effect of Timing of Preharvest Fungicide Applications on Postharvest Botrytis Fruit Rot of Annual Strawberries in Florida

Training and Pruning Almond Trees

Evaluation of Peanut Varieties in Mississippi

Evaluation of Potential New, Size Controlling Rootstocks for European Pears. Rachel Elkins, U.C. Cooperative Extension, Lake and Mendocino Counties

Integration of Tree Spacing, Pruning and Rootstock Selection for Efficient Almond Production

Pistachio rootstocks. Elizabeth J. Fichtner Farm Advisor: nuts, prunes, olives UCCE Tulare and Kings Counties

Resolving our Neighborhood Tree Problem. These guys are trouble waiting to happen!

Grafting and Rootstock Effects on Fruit Yield and Composition in Organic, Field-grown Tomato

Abstract. 1 Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station Paper At participating state agricultural

Evaluation of Grafted and Non-Grafted Hybrid and Heirloom Tomatoes in a High Tunnel

'UF Multi-flora Peach' and 'UF Multi-flora Pink Frost' Gerberas - University of Florida Cultivars for Landscapes and Large Pots 1

Training & Pruning Fruit Trees AG-29

High Tunnel Tomato Production Horticulture and Armstrong Farms 2007

P.J. Hofman Department of Primary Industries Queensland 19 Hercules St, Hamilton, Australia

Project Leaders Curt R. Rom University of Arkansas Dept of Horticulture 316 PTSC, Fayetteville AR

Corn Rootworm Control in Field Corn with planting time treatments. Soil Insecticide Test # 3, 2005

WALNUT BLIGHT CONTROL INVESTIGATIONS TEHAMA 2007

KSU Blackberry Trial Update. Jeremy Lowe and Kirk W. Pomper Kentucky State University

What to Consider: Almond Rootstocks. December 6, 2016

Evaluation of Pyrus and Quince Rootstocks for High Density Pear Orchards

FUTURE ORCHARDS Crop Loading. Prepared by: John Wilton and Ross Wilson AGFIRST Nov 2007

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF AMELANCHIER SP. AND QUINCE ELINE AS ROOTSTOCKS ON 1- TO 2-YEAR-OLD EUROPEAN PEAR TREES

Pruning Timing Options to Avoid Wood Diseases in Young Almonds. Carolyn DeBuse, Farm Advisor Solano & Yolo Counties

WTFRC Project # AH A Penn State Project: WTFRC Soil Moisture 39E8

TRANSMISSION OF ROSE MOSAIC VIRUSES

Steps in the Solution of Avocado Problems

EFFECTS OF SALINITY ON GROWTH AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS OF 'HASS' AVOCADO ON THREE ROOTSTOCKS.

Compared to apple scab and fire

Bob Spotts Kelly Wallis Delivered by Lynn Long

walnuts on system and

Grafting of Tomatoes for Soil-based Production in Greenhouse and High Tunnels Judson Reid, Kathryn Klotzbach and Nelson Hoover

ROOT GROWTH OF SODDED CREEPING BENTGRASS AS INFLUENCED BY

High Tunnel Bramble Production

Transcription:

Evaluation of new low- and moderate-chill peach cultivars in coastal southern California Daniel A. Hagillih, Center Director, UC South Coast Research and Extension Center, 7601 Irvine Boulevard, Irvine, CA 92618-1201; Donald R. Hodel, Environmental Horticulture Advisor, UCCE, Los Angeles County; John N. Kabashima, County Director/Environmental Horticulture Advisor and Darren L. Haver, Watershed Management Advisor, UCCE, Orange County and Tom Spellman, Sales Representative, Dave Wilson Nursery. Introduction A recent study of ten low-chill peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] cultivars indicated that at least six were well adapted and suited for home gardens in south coastal California (Hagillih et al, 2000, 2003; Hodel and Hagillih, 2004). Continued interest in such cultivars prompted us to expand our search for promising low-chill peach cultivars for the home garden to include moderate-chill peaches. For this study, we selected 11 cultivars for comparative evaluation with 3 high-yielding cultivars identified from the recent study: August Pride, Mid-Pride and Tropic Snow (Table 1.). The selected cultivars are releases from breeding programs at the Universities of Florida, Georgia and Texas A & M and from those developed by Dr. Zaiger or some nurseries in California (Burchell Nursery, 2004). We hope that the results of this study will help us to identify additional promising cultivars to fill the need for backyard planting, U-pick, local road stand and farmers market operations. The objectives of this research were, therefore, to 1) evaluate the adaptability, fruit yield and quality of the 14 low- and moderate-chill peach cultivars in south coastal California and 2) assess the vulnerability of these cultivars to any pests and diseases. Materials and Methods A low- and moderate-chill peach cultivar trial was established at the University of California South Coast Research and Extension Center in Irvine, California, in March 2005. All 14 cultivars tested were grafted on Nemaguard rootstock. The peach trees were planted in a complete block design where the experimental unit was a two-tree plot containing trees of the same cultivar. Tree spacing was 6 m between rows and 3 m in-row and trees were trained to the open-vase system. Plots were replicated 5 times. We managed the trial orchard according to recommended cultural practices for peaches (La Rue and Johnson, 1989). Tree trunk diameters were measured on a painted area 5 cm above the graft union initially in March 2005 and after cessation of growth in December 2005. Tree diameter measurements were converted to and analyzed as trunk cross-sectional area (TCA). In August 2005, we determined the severity of a powdery mildew infection on the trees by a visual rating system. Tree canopies were rated as percent coverage of tree foliage and branches with powdery mildew where 5% coverage was considered to be minimal infection (Fig. 1.) while 100% coverage was considered to be severe infection (Fig. 2.). Data for tree TCA and powdery mildew rating were recorded on a per tree basis and analyzed by the standard ANOVA procedure of the CoStat Statistical Software. Mean separation was by

Duncan s multiple range test. The bloom date reflected date of first flowering by a tree or trees of a given cultivar. Results and Discussion Trunk cross-sectional area is a universal criterion to compare tree size of different treatments or cultivars. It relates directly to the size of the canopy, and therefore allows a rough comparison of relative growth. However, where initial TCAs of treated trees or cultivars are significantly variable or for reporting first-year tree growth, a better criterion would be TCA increase rather than TCA itself. Thus, Schupp (2001) used TCA increase to compare treatment effects on firstyear tree growth of apples. The cultivars were significantly variable in CTA at the start of the trial (Table 1.). Therefore, we reported tree growth as CTA increase for the first year of growth. Results indicated that 4 cultivars ( May Pride, Scarlet Robe, Desert Gold and August Pride ) had the greatest TCA increases, ranging from 24.2 cm 2 to 23.2 cm 2. These cultivars had significantly higher TCA increases than the 4 cultivars with the least TCA increases, ranging from 15.3 cm 2 to 15.0 cm 2 : Donut Stark Saturn, June Pride, Summerset and Tropic Snow. The remaining 6 cultivars had intermediate TCA increases and they did not significantly differ from either the cultivars with the greatest TCA increases or those with the least TCA increases. These are preliminary results and we cannot tell if these tree growth trends for the cultivars will carry into the future. In August 2005 trees began to show symptoms of powdery mildew. We rated the severity of the infection visually and the incidence of the disease on foliage and branches is presented in Table 1. The cultivars Santa Barbara, Donut Stark Saturn, Snow Beauty White, Summerset and Fantastic Elberta were moderately to somewhat severely infected with powdery mildew, the infection ranging from 46% to 71% surface coverage of the tree canopy. The infection of the remaining 9 cultivars ranged from 7% to 36% surface coverage. We were able to adequately control the disease with a single spray application of Rally 40W (Myclobutanil). Although it is still too early in the trial, these results suggest that the 4 Pride group of cultivars in this study and Tropic Snow appear to be more resistant to powdery mildew and home gardeners may use this information to select cultivars. The bloom dates of the early flowering cultivars ranged from February 1 to February 22 while the bloom dates of the late flowering cultivars ranged from April 2 to April 22 (Table 1.). There were 7 cultivars in the former category and 7 in the latter category. Conclusion These data are only preliminary. A few more years will be required to evaluate these cultivars adequately, but it is interesting to observe the significant differences that have developed in this first season. First-year results showed that 4 cultivars had significantly higher CTA increases than 4 other cultivars with the least CTA increases. The remaining 6 cultivars had intermediate CTA increases which did not differ significantly from either of the 2 cultivar groupings. Evaluation of the cultivars for incidence of powdery mildew suggests that the 4 Pride group of

cultivars in this study and Tropic Snow may be more resistant to the disease compared to 5 other cultivars. Home gardeners and others may use this information to select cultivars. Finally, our results suggest that we can also group these cultivars in 2 categories: early flowering and late flowering types. There were 7 early flowering cultivars with bloom dates ranging from February 1 to February 22.There were also 7 late flowering cultivars with bloom dates ranging from April 2 to April 22. Literature Cited Burchell Nursery. 2004. http://www.burchellnursery.com/peaches.htm Hagillih, D, F. James, D. R. Hodel, R. Mabie, G. S. Bender, and V. Lazaneo.2000.Evaluation of low-chill deciduous tree fruit cultivars (Part I): peaches. Report of the Elvenia J. Slosson Fund for Ornamental Horticulture: 1999-2000. University of California, Davis, CA. Hagillih, D., D.R. Hodel, R.A.M Surls, G.S Bender and V.F. Lazaneo. 2003. Performance of low-chill peach cultivars in South Coastal California. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 116: 47-50.2003. Hodel, D.R. and D. Hagillih. 2004. Evaluation of Ten Low-Chill Peaches for Mild-Winter Areas of Coastal Southern California. Pacific Coast Nursery 63(6): 66-68. LaRue, J.H. and R.S. Johnson (eds.). 1989. Peaches, Plums and Nectarines Growing and Handling for Fresh Market. University of California. Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Publication 3331. Schupp, J.R. 2001. Improving the Growth of Newly Planted Apple Trees. Fruit Notes 6:45-46.

Fig.1. Peach tree leaves and branches minimally infected (5% surface coverage) with powdery mildew.

Fig. 2. Peach tree leaves and branches severely infected (100% surface coverage) with powdery mildew.

Table 1. Tree trunk cross-sectional area (TCA) growth, Bloom Date and Powdery Mildew Rating of 14 low- and moderate-chill peach cultivars. Initial TCA 2005 TCA Bloom Date Powdery Mildew Cultivars (cm 2 ) Increase, cm 2 Rating z May Pride 2.7de y 24.2a y 2/06/06 11ef y Scarlet Robe 3.9bc 24.0a 4/10/06 36bcdef Desert Gold 2.1e 23.3a 2/12/06 35bcdef August Pride 4.3b 23.2a 2/13/06 34bcdef Snow Beauty White 3.9bc 22.4ab 4/10/06 60abc Early Amber 4.5b 21.0ab 2/06/06 23def Santa Barbara 3.0d 20.5ab 4/16/06 71a Elberta 6.2a 18.4ab 2/22/06 32cdef Mid-Pride 3.0d 17.9ab 2/12/06 12ef Fantastic Elberta 6.9a 16.9ab 4/22/06 46abcde Donut Stark Saturn 4.0bc 15.3b 4/02/06 69ab June Pride 2.9d 15.2b 4/20/06 29cdef Summerset 4.1bc 15.0b 4/18/06 58abcd Tropic Snow 3.3cd 15.0b 2/01/06 7f z Percent surface coverage of tree foliage and branches with powdery mildew. y Mean separation in columns by Duncan s multiple range test, 5% level.