cc: K. Sandefur B. Greene TO: Mark Hite, P.E. R. Powell Division of Structural Design P. Sanders FROM: Bart Asher, P.E. V.

Similar documents
Division of Structural Design Geotechnical Branch

511 - RIP RAP - OPSS 511 ROCK PROTECTION - OPSS 511 GRAVEL SHEETING - OPSS 511 GEOTEXTILE - OPSS 511

B511 - RIP-RAP, ROCK PROTECTION AND GRANULAR SHEETING - OPSS 511

HYDRAULIC DESIGN involves several basic

Final Design Activity Descriptions July, 2017

Alternate Green Stream Bank Stabilization Methods

Advanced Foundation Engineering. Soil Exploration

Gary Person, Foundation Engineer Geotechnical Engineering Section

STREAM ALTERATION PRACTICES

Information for File # JTF

Structural Storm Water Best Management Practices (BMPs)

June Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Engineering District Herr Street Harrisburg, PA 17103

PLAN SUBMITTER'S CHECKLIST

Chapter 1 GENERAL SOUTH DAKOTA DRAINAGE MANUAL

City of Stoughton Erosion Control Permit Application (effective 2/6/2018)

Urban Conservation Practice Physical Effects ESTABLISHMENT, GROWTH, AND HARVEST NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

Advanced Foundation Engineering. Introduction

Gloucester County PLAN SUBMITTER'S CHECKLIST

-AIHL NOISE UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM. Aqx. R CORPS OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY APPENDIX A

Technical Supplement 14D. Geosynthetics in Stream Restoration. (210 VI NEH, August 2007)

Advanced Foundation Engineering. Sheet-Pile Walls

URBANIZED STREAM CORRIDOR: COMMUNITY APPROACH TO ADDRESS EROSION

Department of Agriculture. Conservation Service. United States. Natural Resources REVISED 8/26/16

Subsoil conditions are examined using test borings, provided by soil engineer (geotechnical).

KYTC and NFIP: Bridging Floodplain Management and Design KAMM CONFERENCE AUGUST 25, 2015

2014 HDR 2014 Architecture, HDR, Inc., all all rights reserved. reserved.

E R O S I O N C O N T R O L

THE OBJECTIVES OF ROUTINE ROAD CUTS AND FILLS

V. EROSION CONTROL. -Drainage swales separation -Under rip-rap protected -Under rip-rap unprotected

Severn River Sub-Watershed: BMP 09-Retrofit

Information for File # ARC

UNIFIED FACILITIES GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS

Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Application Form & Checklist

Geosynthetics for Erosion Control and Reinforcement

WQ-23 MOUNTAINOUS AND STEEP SLOPE SITES

Indirect Design Comparison of the structural strength of the pipe (Three- Edge-Bearing Test) to the field supporting strength of a buried pipe.

Guidelines for Streambank Protection

CASE HISTORY USE OF TECHGEO NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE AND TECHGEO NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE BAGS FOR RIVERBANK PROTECTION

ACTIVITY: Geotextiles ES 12

Addendum No. 2 for Drainage Improvements For Nueces River Fishing Area

INSTALLATION GUIDELINES FOR GEOTEXTILES USED IN FILTRATION AND DRAINAGE APPLICATIONS

ALTERNATIVE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT IN COASTAL MISSISSIPPI

Sydney Road Reclaimed Water Main, Plant City, Florida. Prepared for: Jones Edmunds & Associates, Inc.

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY STORMWATER PROGRAM

FURNEAUX CREEK 5 CHANNEL

Full Scale Model Test of Soil Reinforcement on Soft Soil Deposition with Inclined Timber Pile

Overall Stability Moving from Service to Strength Limit State: Why? Nick Harman, MS, PE Ani Carignan, PE, LEED AP STGEC Conference October, 2018

MARBLE RIVER WIND POWER PROJECT Agricultural Protection Measures

Rolled Erosion Control Products (RECPs) General Usage and Installation Guidelines for Slope

Streambank Protection (SP)

PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS

SILT FENCE MACHINE SLICED ERO-1A STEEL FENCE POST (T-POST), MINIMUM 5' LONG, 6' MAXIMUM SPACING.

APPENDIX E COMPACTION CHARACTERISTICS AND EQUIPMENT

Guidelines for Installing Rolled Erosion Control Products in Slope, Channel and Shoreline Applications Laurie Honnigford

EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. Proposed Relocation for Ninth Line, Markham and Whitchurch-Stouffville. Environmental Screening Report

Erosion Control for Home Builders in the. City of Jacksonville

1 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Stream Restoration: Working with Nature?

Stream Restoration: Working with Nature? Greg Jennings, PhD, PE

A: Downtown Diversion Pipe

Project Name: Project Address or Location: Principal Designer Name and Company: Principal Designer Phone Number:

Appendix E Preliminary Location Hydraulic Study

PROJECT CLIMATE RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT REPORT

Methods, approaches, and procedures to minimize active agricultural land impacts during pipeline construction, surface restoration, and pipeline

Lake Shoreline Stabilization Techniques

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR RIP RAP, ROCK PROTECTION AND GRAVEL SHEETING

Design and Installation of Embedded Culverts

APPLICATIONS IN FILTRATION AND DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL

Methods, approaches, and procedures to minimize active agricultural land impacts during pipeline construction, surface restoration, and pipeline

Vegetating Disturbed Road & Stream Banks. By Mike Fournier NRCS Resource Conservationist

Design, Construction and Maintenance of Irrigation Reservoirs in Ontario

DITCH BANK STABILIZATION TECHNIQUES

ABBREVIATIONS: TABLE OF CONTENTS: REFERENCE MATERIALS: CITY OF SEATTLE COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW GALLONS PER MINUTE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE SQUARE FEET

SECTION 6. Routine Maintenance Activity Details

Guiding Landowners in Stream Restoration. The Science, Practice & Art of Restoring Native Ecosystems 2015

EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

Coastal and River Erosion Control. Erosion

Technical Specification Guidelines

The City of Winnipeg Bid Opportunity No GEOTECHNICAL REPORT - TEST HOLE LOGS

I. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION... 1 A. General Description... 1 B. Historical Resume and Project Status... 2 C. Cost Estimates...

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR RIP-RAP, ROCK PROTECTION, AND GRANULAR SHEETING

STORM SEWER OUTFALLS AND CONNECTING OUTFALL CHANNELS. General Submission Requirements

GEOMEMBRANE FIELD INSTALLATION

ACE Geosynthetics. An Overview of

field note Culvert foundation improvement design concepts The challenge of low-cost culvert foundations

HILCORP ALASKA, LLC KALOTSA PAD

Slope Stabilization and Repair Solutions for Local Government Engineers

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL

Coffee Creek Park Development Low Impact Development (LID)

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR RIP-RAP, ROCK PROTECTION, AND GRANULAR SHEETING

Goal 1 To establish and follow land use patterns for the long-range development of the campus.

Landfill Closure, Intermediate Cover & Post-Closure Care. Municipal League Meeting

UPLAND EROSION CONTROL, REVEGETATION, AND MAINTENANCE PLAN

Geotechnical Exploration and Evaluation Report

Old Mill Community Association Bioretention Facility

Vermont Better Backroads Pocket Guide

DuPage Mayors and Managers Conference June 21, 2013 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) WORKSHOP

Highway Alignment and Route Location Survey

Coir Block System (fabric attached coir block) add New Dimension to Streambank Stabilization Projects

Transcription:

M E M O R A N D U M (SA-008-2011) cc: K. Sandefur B. Greene TO: Mark Hite, P.E. R. Powell Division of Structural Design J. Moore P. Sanders FROM: Bart Asher, P.E. V. Forsythe TEBM, Geotechnical Branch B. Eldridge P. Dunaway BY: Danny Molen M. Carrier Geotechnical Branch K. Meyer (HDR Inc.) DATE: June 6, 2011 SUBJECT: Hardin County FD04 047 3005 KY 3005 (Ring Road) 42 x 10 3-sided culvert @ WHF Parkway Station 8420+59.80 MARS # 65893 01D Item Number 4-7010.50 Geotechnical Engineering Structure Foundation Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The proposed project consists of the design and construction of the extension of Ring Road (KY 3005) from Gaither Station Road to the Western Kentucky Parkway in Elizabethtown. This report addresses the geotechnical issues for the proposed design and construction of the 42 x 10 foot, 3-sided culvert at the WHF Parkway Station 8420+59.80. A geotechnical engineering structure foundation report was originally issued on this project on January 7, 2004 as report number S-001-2004. The drilling was performed for this culvert showing that bedrock was not within 3 feet of the flowline of the culvert, whereas, this culvert would be designed for a yielding foundation. Advancing the borings to bedrock was not necessary for this type of culvert. The structure has now been changed to a 3-sided culvert. Additional drilling was required due to the bedrock elevation being critical for this type of structure. The abbreviated geotechnical engineering report addendum for this structure has been completed. The.DGN file for the subsurface datasheet is available on Projectwise and through e-mail for use in developing the structure plans. The structure is in the Cecelia (#263) Geologic Quadrangle. The geologic mapping indicates that the bedrock at this site is of the Ste. Genevieve and the St. Louis Limestone Formations.

Hardin Co. MARS # 65893 01D Page 2 of 4 2.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Eight additional holes were drilled for the 3-sided culvert. Two holes were soil sample and rock core borings, and the remaining six holes were mechanical rockline soundings. Thin-walled tube samples and standard penetration test samples were utilized for sampling. This is a highly karstic area. The bedrock elevation varied from 680.8 feet to 671.1 feet. Soils sampled at this location consisted primarily of clays. The Unified Classification of the soils was CL and CH. 3.0 ENGINEERING ANALYSIS Due to the low embankment heights, a settlement analysis was not necessary. Embankment stability analysis was performed in the Geotechnical Engineering Structure Report # R-001-2004 showing the slopes should be stable utilizing 2H:1V slopes or flatter. The soil strength parameters were determined from conservatively correlating SPT N- values and soil classifications with published values found in NAVFAC DM-7.2 and the FHWA Soils and Foundations Workshop Manual. The 100 year flood elevation is 707.71 feet. The soils, at this location, have potential to scour. Potential scour depth calculations have not been performed. However, Cyclopean Stone Riprap is recommended as a scour abatement measure. The riprap shall be placed from the top of the stream bank to the walls of the culvert and extending to 10 feet beyond the culvert inlet and outlet. This riprap should protect the footings from damaging scour. 4.0 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations given below are for a precast structure. 4.1 Foundation Alternate 4.1.1 Alternate 1 Spread Footings on Soil: The spread footings shall be founded on soil. Size the footing at service limit state using a factored nominal bearing resistance of 2.2 ksf. For checking strength and extreme limit states, the nominal bearing resistance has been determined to be: 6.6 ksf. Use a resistance factor of 0.45 for strength limit state analysis and a resistance factor of 1.0 for extreme limit state analysis. 4.1.2 Alternate 2 Granular Replacement: The spread footing shall be founded on granular replacement material using the allowable bearing pressures shown on the attached sheet. The required depths of the granular replacement shall be shown on the plan sheet.

Hardin Co. MARS # 65893 01D Page 3 of 4 4.1.3 Alternate 3 Pile Foundation: Use piles founded on bedrock. The estimated pile tip elevation will vary from 676.7 feet to 658.3 feet. 4.2 The wingwalls should be designed using Soil Type 3 of Exhibit 413 in the Division of Bridge Design Guidance Manual. It should be noted that the backfill slope being referred to is that perpendicular to the wingwall. 4.3 Backfill the pre-cast structure and the accompanying wingwalls according to the manufacturers specifications. 4.4 Cyclopean Stone Rip-Rap shall be placed as a scour abatement measure inside the culvert. The riprap shall be placed from the top of the stream bank to the culvert walls and extend a minimum of 10 feet beyond the culvert inlet and outlet. The limits, size and thickness of cyclopean stone shall be designed for applicable flood flow velocities at the approach slopes of the bridge. Place a Type I, Geotextile Fabric as a separator between the soil and the stone. The Geotextile Fabric shall be in accordance with Sections 214 and 843 of the Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, current edition. 4.5 Granular replacement material, if utilized, shall consist of Granular Embankment. The Granular Embankment shall be non-erodible only, meeting the material requirements of section 805 in the current Kentucky Department of Highways Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. Contrary to the Standard Specifications, the maximum size limit for Granular Embankment is 4 inches. The excavation for the granular replacement shall extend a minimum width beyond the edges of the footings equal to the replacement depth. The granular replacement shall be placed on a 1H:1V slope or flatter from the base of the footing to the bottom of the excavation. Place a Type I, Geotextile Fabric as a separator between the soil and the granular replacement. The Geotextile Fabric shall be in accordance with Sections 214 and 843 of the Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, current edition. 4.6 The base of footing shall be placed at a minimum of 2 feet below the streambed.

Hardin Co. MARS # 65893 01D Page 4 of 4 5.0 PLAN NOTES 5.1 Temporary sheeting or shoring and a dewatering method may be required for installation of the footings. 5.2 Cyclopean Stone Rip-Rap shall be placed as a scour abatement measure inside the culvert. The riprap shall be placed from the top of the stream bank to the culvert walls and extend a minimum of 10 feet beyond the culvert inlet and outlet. The limits, size and thickness of cyclopean stone shall be designed for applicable flood flow velocities at the approach slopes of the bridge. Place a Type I, Geotextile Fabric as a separator between the soil and the stone. The Geotextile Fabric shall be in accordance with Sections 214 and 843 of the Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, current edition. Include the following note if spread footings on granular replacement is used. 5.3 Granular replacement material shall consist of Granular Embankment. The Granular Embankment shall be non-erodible only, meeting the material requirements of section 805 in the current Kentucky Department of Highways Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. Contrary to the Standard Specifications, the maximum size limit for Granular Embankment is 4 inches. The excavation for the granular replacement shall extend a minimum width beyond the edges of the footings equal to the replacement depth. The granular replacement shall be placed on a 1H:1V slope or flatter from the base of the footing to the bottom of the excavation. Place a Type I, Geotextile Fabric as a separator between the soil and the granular replacement. The Geotextile Fabric shall be in accordance with Sections 214 and 843 of the Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, current edition. Please feel free to contact this office if there are any questions pertaining to this report. Attachments

COORDINATE DATA SUBMISSION FORM KYTC DIVISION OF STRUCTURAL DESIGN -- GEOTECHNICAL BRANCH County Hardin County 3/15/2011 Road Number Survey Crew / Consultant Contact Person KY 3005 (Ring Road) District 4 Crew 204 Mark Cannon Notes: Project Datum coordinates were used, based on Item # 4-7010.00 KY South 1602 Mars # 65893 01D Project # FD04 047 3005 Elevation Datum = NAVD88 HOLE LATITUDE LONGITUDE HOLE STATION OFFSET ELEVATION (ft) NUMBER (Decimal Degrees) (Decimal Degrees) NUMBER 2001 37.65718536N 85.88649096W 2001 144+61.333 1187.781 Lt 693.196 2002 37.65728225N 85.88641204W 2002 144+58.081 1229.689 Lt 694.572 2003 37.65720480N 85.88652864W 2003 144+48.370 1186.786 Lt 697.114 2004 37.65730174N 85.88644947W 2004 144+45.161 1228.754 Lt 697.981 2005 37.65744127N 85.88698631W 2005 142+90.801 1174.816 Lt 697.973 2006 37.65753803N 85.88690751W 2006 142+87.549 1216.664 Lt 698.004 2007 37.65745559N 85.88700838W 2007 142+82.559 1175.083 Lt 694.981 2008 37.65757102N 85.88701279W 2008 142+56.034 1207.719 Lt 695.595