Australian National University

Similar documents
Australian National University

Historic Resources Inventory Evaluation Form

Heritage Property 70 Liberty Street (Central Prison Chapel)

5.0 WAITE CAMPUS. 5.1 Description of Campus

Applying the Heritage Overlay

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT

Urban Design Brief 1576 Richmond Street City of London

expectations for new development W A T E R F R O N T D R I V E

4.0 ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT OF COMPONENTS Kuntingga/Park 7 + Barnguttilla/Park 8 Assessment

Chapter 8: BEACH SOUTH OF ATLANTIC AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING AREA ANALYSIS

7.5 Identified sites of significance_residential buildings within Turffontein (Semi-detached, freestanding)

L 4-1. Heritage Report: Reasons for Heritage Designation. Kodors House. 35 Rosedale Avenue West

HISTORIC RESOURCE SURVEY FORM University of Oregon Cultural Resources Survey Eugene, Lane County, Oregon Summer 2006

Expert Evidence by Stephen Davies: Heritage Consultant. JOHN EDWARD MYTTON BARNES and GEOFFREY FREDERICK COOK (APPELLANTS)

Binghamton University Construction SUMMER 2012 HIGHLIGHTS

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING ON MONDAY AUGUST 28, 2017 JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

A SMALL SITE. Architect Schulberg Demkiw Architects Photographer Derek Swalwell Stylist Rachel Vigor Location Melbourne

Register of Significant Twentieth Century Architecture

Jason Greer Lighting / Electrical L/E Consultant: Dr. Mistrick. Villanova University: School of Law Villanova, PA

Cambridge. West Cambridge site. What is a Shared Facilities Hub? Welcome

Oconomowoc Area School District Facility Construction Update August 25, 2017

Warren Farm, Ampthill

HERITAGE STATEMENT AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT HILLBARK FARMHOUSE FRANKBY

DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT

Tech Report. September 9,

REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS HUDSON LIBRARY FIT OUT FOR MERIDEN SCHOOL, STRATHFIELD NSW

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

Design Guidelines - 1 -

7.6 Identified sites of significance_residential buildings within Central Brixton Precinct (Semi-detached, freestanding)

2418 KHALSA GATE, OAKVILLE URBAN DESIGN BRIEF APPLICATION FOR ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT. Prepared for: Golden Arch Tech Investment Corporation

City of Redlands Architectural Guidelines for Non-Residential Development

GREATER SHEPPARTON CULTURAL HERITAGE AWARDS GUIDELINES

SUBJECT: Report recommending 563 North Shore Boulevard East remain on the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources

RIVERSIDE DESIGN CD-1 GUIDELINES. Adopted by City Council August 9, 1983

Plots L4 & L5 Marchwood Industrial Park Presentation to Marchwood Parish Council 27 th February 2017

~~-~ ASSESSMENT OF CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE OBSERVATORY HILL SYDNEY I I I I I. February For Edaw. Prepared by Wendy Thorp

Executive Summary. May 2014 Page 1

Thesis Proposal. Brian Regan The Virginia Historical Society Building West Wing Addition RICHMOND, VIRGINIA

7.0 NATIONAL WINE CENTRE

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Planning Division m e m o r a n d u m

770 Somerset Street design brief UDRP Formal Review December 7, 2017

We are very pleased to welcome you to this event today.

1755 Le Roy Avenue (Tellefson Hall)

Heritage Management Plan TOAD HALL. Australian Capital Territory. September 2010

SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

Commercial Building Cuba Street. Images: Charles Collins, Summary of heritage significance

5 HERITAGE VALUES. 5.1 Method and Basis of Assessment

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Memo. B R A Y H e r i t a g e

Meeting Agenda. Business Items

Surface Materials. Surface Material Reflectance. Acoustic Ceiling 80% Tile. Painted Gypsum 75% Wall Board. Vinyl Composition 32% Tile

Urban Institute for Contemporary Arts

Evidential value The meeting house site is likely to have low archaeological potential and the building has low evidential value.

PLANNING COMMITTEE. 14 October 2014

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF. 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road. Town of Oakville

SECTION 5.0 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES

58: 1285 Sedgewick Crescent, Rotary Gardens

Urban Design Brief Proposed Residential Development 5219 Upper Middle Road City of Burlington

Principle 7. Architectural Style and Historic Preservation PRINCIPLE 7

ELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COURT APPEAL NO. 313 of 2010

APPLICATION BRIEFING Prepared For: Submitted by: Date: Subject:

523, 525 and 525A Adelaide Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

.+-M,.-,.+*,,A,--< ;:--t fi. ;,==: r ) i Q ; ',,(.:,*> 8 I-="' e$ ,; \!!&,,u

Kelowna Heritage Register Evaluation Criteria

Friends Meeting House, Broughton. Meeting House Lane, Little Broughton, Cockermouth, CA13 0YQ. National Grid Reference: NY

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Campus Identity & Design Guidelines

Parish Derry Slopes ITM Coordinates ; NG Coordinates C House B1 and farm buildings B2; Registered Garden L061

WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Design and siting guidelines

BASIC SITE PLAN AND DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR REDEVELOPMENT OF 114 RICHMOND ROAD

Urban Planning and Land Use

20th of April To the Chairperson and Members of the South East Area Committee

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Executive Director (Operational Services) Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities)

Theosophical Society Hall

Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Roncesvalles Avenue

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

Urban Design Brief December 23, 2015 Southside Construction Group Official Plan & Zoning By-Law Amendment

The 20 Bedford Way Masterplan

HISTORICAL AND SOCIAL SIGNIFICANCE PHOTOGRAPH: M.VAIR-PIOVA, 2014

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

8.1. Fire and Heritage. The maintenance series. Information sheet. Guidelines on Fire Safety in Heritage Buildings

Architectural Inventory Form

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE ON TUESDAY MARCH 29, 2016

FACULTY OF LAW EXPANSION AND

Derry City and Strabane District Council Planning Committee Report

CENTENNIAL PARKLANDS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN: VOLUME

CENTENNIAL PARKLANDS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN: VOLUME

College of William and Mary Campus Heritage Preservation Project

599 Kennedy Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

University of California, San Diego Cal IT 2 Brian Smith. Schematic Design Presentation 06 December 2005

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Front Yard Terracing PLNHLC South 1200 East Meeting Date: August 7, 2014

Bridgedale, Bridgetown Request for Expressions of Interest to Lease and/ or Develop

176 Cardiff Road Newport

University Park, Worcester Non Technical Summary December 2011

by Jennifer Tempest BA(Hons) MA PGDip PGCert Cert HE MRTPI IHBC an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

2154 Dundas Street West Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act

Transcription:

Study Item/ Area Acton Campus Precinct Building Nos. & Names Physics/Psychology DALEY Precinct 38 (Physics Building), 38A (Physics Link Building), 38B (Gravity Wave Building), 39 (Psychology Building) Figure 1: Location of study area within the ANU Acton Campus site. Heritage Ranking Heritage Listing Condition Date Relevant Documentation Physics Building Moderate Meets the criteria for Commonwealth Heritage List Physics Link Building Neutral Meets the criteria for Commonwealth Heritage List Gravity Wave Building Neutral Meets the criteria for Commonwealth Heritage List Psychology Building Moderate Meets the criteria for Commonwealth Heritage List The Physics and Psychology buildings are not individually listed on the Commonwealth Heritage List (CHL). The condition noted here is at April 2012. The extant buildings and trees of the Physics and Psychology area continue to be well maintained for Student education and research and are in good condition. There is currently no relevant documentation for the Physics and Psychology Buildings. 1 ANU Physics & Psychology Buildings (38, 38A, 38B & 39)

Context of the Buildings Figure 2: The Physics and Psychology Buildings in the context of the Daley Precinct with the Research School of Chemistry to the east. Figure 3: The Physics and Psychology Buildings in relation to Bruce Hall to the west and University Avenue to the south. Brief Historical Overview The Physics Building (38) was completed in 1960 and was designed by Eggleston, MacDonald and Secomb and built by SDG Kennedy and Bird. The second stage was completed in 1961 with the new wing being occupied by the Biology Department in September 1962. In 1976 a garbage bin compound was added which would later become garages for the building. By this time stage three of the building was complete. In 1991 the Psychology and Biology Departments combined to form the School of Life Sciences, and in 1995 the fourth stage, the Physics Link Building (38b), was completed. Building 38a was designed by Wagdy Hanna & Associates and was constructed by GE Shaw and Associates in 1995. The Gravity Wave Building (38B), designed by Facilities and Services Department in 1998 and constructed by Northrop Consulting Engineers was completed in 2000. The building was opened in April of the same year. The Psychology Building (39) was originally a building used by the Physics Department, also designed by Eggleston, MacDonald and Secomb in 1960 and was built concurrently with the Physics Building (38) by SDG Kennedy and Bird. In 1968 stage one of the Physics Lecture Theatre had begun and was completed in August 1969. In 1992 the building began its shared use with Psychology. 2 ANU Physics & Psychology Buildings (38, 38A, 38B & 39)

Figure 4: Site location plan of the Physics and Psychology buildings, drawn up December 2003 by Bunning and Madden Architects. Description of the The Physics and Psychology Buildings Buildings The Physics Building (38) consists of a pair of rectangular buildings oriented north and joined by a single storey amenities building. The internal court has colonnades formed by the recessing of all lower levels. Access to first floor level is provided across the roof of the amenities link. The southernmost building (39) has a lecture theatre at the eastern end. Access off University Avenue is via an aquamarine tiled porch. The exterior materials include vermiculite render to the exposed concrete structure, with the southern entrance having black brickwork infill either side. Clear anodised aluminium window and door suites are included. The interior includes a tile mosaic entry, vinyl sheeting, painted block work and suspended ceilings. Offices include carpet tiles. In 1995 there was an extension added to the south-eastern end of the northernmost building (38). This extension is constructed of brown face brick rectangular building with a low gable, pre-coated, metal tray roof. The windows are clear anodised aluminium stacked vertically with white brick between floors. It is linked to Building 38 with an aluminium framed glass double storey walkway. The entrance is located opposite Building 34. The Physics Lecture Theatre (39) is a multisided lecture theatre connected to the main building at the northern edge. Access to the building is via the covered walkway which runs the entire northern side of the building. The exterior materials include a vermiculite render to the concrete structure with clear anodised aluminium framed glazed windows and copper downpipes. Landscape The landscape in the area is mixed and includes grassed areas with concrete paths between buildings and created garden beds and water features. Artworks include Pulse by Marion Borgelt, 2001, Pursuit of Scientific Knowledge by Vincas Jomantas, 1962 and Untitled 9/74 by Reginald Parker, 1974. 3 ANU Physics & Psychology Buildings (38, 38A, 38B & 39)

Significance Assessment against the Commonwealth Heritage criteria Statement of Significance The Physics and Psychology Buildings Group were constructed during a major period of development for the ANU and were constructed during a major period of development for the ANU. They were designed by Eggleston, MacDonald and Secomb, who were major contributors to the buildings on campus during the 1960s and 1970s in the implementation of Denis Winston s Precinct Plan for the ANU Criteria (a) Historic place s importance in the course, or pattern, of Australia s natural or cultural history. (b) Rarity values because of the place s possession of uncommon, rare or endangered aspects of Australia s natural or cultural history. (c) Scientific place s potential to yield information that will contribute to an understanding of Australia s natural or cultural history. Assessment The Physics and Psychology Buildings Group were constructed during a major period of development for the ANU. They were designed by Eggleston, MacDonald and Secomb, who were major contributors to the buildings on campus during the 1960s and 1970s in the implementation of Denis Winston s Precinct Plan for the ANU The Physics and Psychology Buildings meet CHL criterion (a) for historic values. Attributes The group of buildings, their associations with architects Eggleston, Macdonald and Secomb and their role as part of Denis Winston s Precinct Plan for the ANU. The Physics and Psychology Buildings do not meet CHL criterion (b) for rarity values. The Physics and Psychology Buildings do not meet CHL criterion (c) for scientific values. 4 ANU Physics & Psychology Buildings (38, 38A, 38B & 39)

Significance Assessment against the Commonwealth Heritage criteria (d) Representative place s importance in demonstrating the principal characteristics of: A class of Australia s natural or cultural places; or A class of Australia s natural or cultural environments. (e) Aesthetic place s importance in exhibiting particular aesthetic characteristics valued by a community or cultural group. (f) Creative/Technical place s importance in demonstrating a high degree of creative or technical achievement at a particular period. (g) Social place s strong or special association with a particular community or cultural group for social, cultural or spiritual reasons. The Physics and Psychology Buildings do not meet CHL criterion (d) for representative values. At this stage, The Physics and Psychology Buildings do not meet this part of the criterion because the aesthetic value has not been formally tested by the community or cultural group. The Physics and Psychology Buildings do not meet CHL criterion (e) for aesthetic values. The Physics and Psychology Buildings do not meet CHL criterion (f) for creative/technical values. At this stage the social value of the Physics and Psychology Buildings has not been formally tested by the community or cultural group and therefore does not meet this criterion. The Physics and Psychology Buildings do not meet CHL criterion (g) for social values. 5 ANU Physics & Psychology Buildings (38, 38A, 38B & 39)

Significance Assessment against the Commonwealth Heritage criteria (h) Associative place s special association with the life or works of a person, or group of persons, of importance in Australia s natural and cultural history. (i) Indigenous place s importance as part of Indigenous tradition. The Physics and Psychology Buildings do not meet CHL criterion (h) for associative values. The Physics and Psychology Buildings do not meet CHL criterion (i) for Indigenous values. Photographs Figure 5: The main wing of the Physics Building and its enclosed courtyard in the University s School of General Studies. Image by Max Dupain circa 1964. (Source: ANU Archives) Figure 6: View of the Physics Building from the northeast, 1964. (Source: ANU Archives) 6 ANU Physics & Psychology Buildings (38, 38A, 38B & 39)

Photographs Figure 7: View of the Physics Building courtyard including landscaping, circa 1964. (Source: ANU Archives) Figure 8: View of the landscaping around the Physics Buildings and Garages. (Source: ANU Heritage Office 2010) Figure 9: View of the Physics link building entrance. (Source: http://lostoncampus.com.au/img/poi/l/main-entrance-15180.jpg) Figure 10: View of the Physics Building by the accessible entry point. (Source: http://lostoncampus.com.au/14936) Management Issues Constraints and Opportunities Constraints arise from the identified heritage values of the Physics & Psychology Buildings and the requirement under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwth) (EPBC Act) to conserve them. The significant fabric of the Physics & Psychology Buildings, as indicated in the attributes above, should be conserved wherever possible. The Tolerance for Change heritage management tool, outlined in Section 7.6 of the ANU Action Campus Heritage Study 2012, will assist in conserving heritage values through a process of change. The Physics & Psychology Buildings is able to tolerate a moderate level of change through development whereby the significant attributes and characteristics are conserved and interpreted. Opportunities arise from any future identifiable heritage values of the Physics & Psychology Buildings. A greater degree of change may be tolerated if interpretation is of a very high quality and considered in any future development, which presents the identified heritage values for the future. Recommendations 7 ANU Physics & Psychology Buildings (38, 38A, 38B & 39)

If development resulting in loss of significant fabric is proposed, interpretation and a heritage impact assessment would be a prerequisite according to EPBC Act requirements. Photographic recording for the ANU archives should be undertaken prior to any potential loss of significant fabric, buildings or landscaping in any future development of the Physics & Psychology Buildings. A formal assessment of the aesthetic and social values of the building should be carried out. 8 ANU Physics & Psychology Buildings (38, 38A, 38B & 39)