CAO Update Status Work continues on products: Draft ordinance BAS report CAO process summary (2002 to present) Comprehensive e Plan policy review Some

Similar documents
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA CHECKLIST OPEN SPACE CLASSIFICATION

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

Conservation Corridor Base and Thematic Maps

Public Visioning City of Kelso Planning Commission

The Restoration of Reading Creek & Model Stream Buffer Ordinances/ Zoning Regulations for Alabama Streams

Washington State s Growth Management Act

TO: Port of Orcas FROM: Tina Whitman, Science Director SUBJECT: Master Plan Update DATE: September 7, 2018

Staff will be providing an overview of the project need, purpose and intent for consideration as part of the Amendment cycle.

Working Group Meeting

Options for addressing City of Edmonds Alternatives to Ecology s Required Changes addressing Edmonds Marsh Buffers and Setbacks.

St. Croix County Shoreland Overlay Zoning Districts. Public Hearing Community Development Committee December 19, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

Rural Land Use Designations Kittitas County December 6, 2007 Draft

Zoning Ordinance Article 3

2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments C OMPREHENSIVE P LAN T EXT AND M AP A MENDMENT

CONSERVATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4

Low-Impact Development Code Update. Thurston County Community Stakeholder Group June 25, 2015

HAZARD MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Minnesota Department of Natural Resource - Natural Resource Guidance Checklist Conserving Natural Resources through Density Bonuses

Conservation Plan. I. Property Information. II. Objectives. Natural Resource Objectives. Sustainability in Practice (SIP) Certified

COUNTY-WIDE PLANNING POLICIES

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CODES ANALYSIS RICHLAND COUNTY, SC SITE PLANNING ROUNDTABLE

DOMINION BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN A MODEL FOR CHESAPEAKE S FUTURE

STREAM BUFFERS

Joe Pool Lake Lake Master Plan Public Information Meeting Presentation of Final Draft Revision July 31, 2018

Planning for Staten. Habitat Restoration and Green Infrastructure. Island s North Shore

Shoreline Master Program Town of La Conner, Washington

City of Missoula and Missoula County Open Space Planning Open House

Chapter 3 Site Planning and Low Impact Development

5/22/2012. Low Impact Development through NPDES Permits TAKE AWAY MESSAGES. Municipal Stormwater NPDES Permits

BEFORE THE HEARINGS EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

When planning stormwater management facilities, the following principles shall be applied where possible.

Regional Open Space Conservation Plan. Regional Staff Committee January 18, 2018

Public Open House. Welcome! Presentation at 5:15 p.m. Please sign-in at the registration table

Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Conservation Plan

SENSITIVE LANDS OVERLAY

Chapter 4 - Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans

Stevens County Partnership Shoreline Master Program Update

Conservation Corridor Planning and Green Infrastructure Themes

Shoreland Protection in Maine Communities of the Piscataqua River Estuary

DRAFT DESIGN CRITERIA STORMWATER TREATMENT STANDARDS CITY OF OVERLAND PARK

SEMSWA s Role in the Land Development Process

systems is available on the Colorado Wetland Information Center (CWIC) website.

Oakland County s Green Infrastructure Vision. L. Brooks Patterson Oakland County Executive

Introduction to the Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Update. City of Bellingham Planning Department 2005

CITY OF MORRO BAY PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT 955 SHASTA AVENUE. MORRO BAY, CA

TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM STRATEGY APPENDIX F: MODEL POLICIES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TARGET TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM

Section 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Objective: Resolution to recommend adoption of the Big Thompson Assessment to the Planning Commission

PURPOSE: The purpose is to provide commercial facilities in the Vancouver and Clark County vicinity.

City of Tacoma Shoreline Master Program Update Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting September 10, 2009

Whitemarsh Township Greenway Plan

Article 6 Tree Protection

INTRODUCTION Key Issues and Findings Goals, Objectives, and Policies - Natural Resources - Map M18 - Environmental Resources

LAND USE ELEMENT. Purpose. General Goals & Policies

Public Information Meeting

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation March 25, 2004 LOS ANGELES GREEN VISION PLAN. File No.: Project Manager: Marc Beyeler

Chapter 5: Natural Resources and Environment

Memorandum Planning. Thursday, January 8, 2015

Community LID Workgroup Issue Paper #6

APPENDIX A SIMPLIFIED APPROACH TO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOR SMALL PROJECTS. In West Sadsbury Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania

Parks, Open Space and Trails

Allison, we own 11 acre parcel at Old Hwy 99 SW, Rochester parcel #

Adopting the Manual of Best Management Practices for Stormwater Quality. Facts for Communities

FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT APPLICATION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT W. Ten Mile Road Novi, MI (248)

City of Richland Comprehensive Plan: Integrated Non-project Final Environmental Impact Statement

RESOURCE STEWARDSHIP DEPARTMENT Cynthia Wilson Director

Exhibit A Comprehensive Plan Amendments

Building Ecological Solutions to Coastal Community Hazards: Guidance and NJ Coastal Community Assistance

Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District Stormwater Management Plan Review Policy

Dwelling Units Max 12 dwelling units per acre/min 8 dwelling units per acre. Development Mix 80% non residential/20% residential

Canyon Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting March 18, 2016

Goals and Objectives Survey December 4, 2013

DRAFT SCOPE FOR THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR HUDSON HIGHLANDS RESERVE TOWN OF PHILIPSTOWN, NEW YORK June 5, 2018

Existing Conditions and Environmental Consequences Floodplains

Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE

Joe Pool Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 23, 2017

2018 AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Staff Report & Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Amendments to the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan

Planning for and Managing Open Space and Natural Areas

Green Infrastructure Policies and Ordinances

LEGAL NOTICE. City of Tacoma Determination of Environmental Nonsignificance. Fred Wagner, Wagner Development. Demolition of Manitou school buildings

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF PLANNING AND ZONING - DEVELOPMENT DIVISION FINAL PLAN - SUBMITTAL APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS.

Landscape Conservation Design April, 2014

50-year Water & Wetland Vision for England WORKSHOP DETAILS

AMENDMENT NO. 30 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWN OF MILTON

Development of a Resource Planning Index for Washington's Scenic and Recreational Highways

Preface. Erie. Scranton. Allentown. Pittsburgh. Harrisburg. Philadelphia

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WINDSOR Office of the City Solicitor Planning Department

OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLANS (OCPs) AND ZONING BYLAWS (ZBs): PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE

Chapter 13: Implementation Plan

Riparian Buffer on the Bushkill Creek. Policies

Blue/Green Infrastructure Study Accomack County, VA

Portage County Parks, Trails and Greenways Plan

Lewisville Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 2 & 4, 2017

National Association of Conservation Districts. Kris Hoellen Vice President, Sustainable Programs The Conservation Fund September 19, 2013

Policy DM19: Development and Nature Conservation

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF PLANNING AND ZONING - DEVELOPMENT DIVISION. Site Development Plan Submittal Application Requirements

Transcription:

Critical Areas Ordinance Update Wetlands Andrew Deffobis Jeremy Davis Cynthia Wilson Thurston County Planning April 6, 2011

CAO Update Status Work continues on products: Draft ordinance BAS report CAO process summary (2002 to present) Comprehensive e Plan policy review Some chapters distributed to PC Updated project timeline (handout)

Overview Wetland regulation in Thurston County Changes since February draft Major differences between current and draft wetlands CAO element Comparisons with other jurisdictions

Wetland Regulation in Thurston County (handout) 1980 Environmentally Sensitive Areas and Wetland Fill Stated purposes are similar to CAO Protects wetlands, geologic hazard areas and marine bluffs, critical wildlife habitat areas, anadromous fish rearing habitat 1994 current CAO adopted Post 1994 minor updates to CAO

Changes since 2/2/2011 draft Continued internal review New comments from Ecology ACOE documents are now default delineation guidance All bogs are now considered Cat. I wetlands New draft no longer allows buffer reduction for vegetation enhancement; reduction allowed for reducing impacts to buffer (see page 7 of draft) Limited buffer encroachments to outer 25% of buffer (previously outer 50%)

Overview of changes since 1994 Organizational difference (streams and FFAs pulled out) Expanded from three to four wetland categories Jurisdictional size proposed to decrease Buffer width calculation method proposed to change Strengthened criteria for reduction of buffers Replacement of certain Cat. III and IV wetlands proposed

Comparisons with surrounding jurisdictions (handout) Analyzed CAOs of adjacent jurisdictions Counties: Lewis, Mason, Grays Harbor, Pierce Cities: Olympia, Lacey, Tumwater, Yelm, Rainier, Tenino Looked at jurisdictional wetland size and buffer widths/methods In future, will provide analysis of buffer width alteration provisions and mitigation standards

Jurisdictional Size of Wetland Currently: 22,000 SF in rural areas; 11,000 SF in UGA; 2,500 SF if adjacent to stream or in 100-year floodplain Proposal: 1,000 SF* Used by Lewis, Mason, Grays Harbor Counties; Olympia, Tumwater, Tenino Different techniques used by Pierce County, Lacey and Yelm *Or smaller if associated with riparian corridor, wetland mosaic, essential habitat for priority species

Wetland Buffers Analyzed adjacent jurisdictions for: Range of standard buffer widths How buffers were determined Whether any alterations to buffer widths were allowed Further discussion of buffer width alteration at April 20 meeting

Wetland Buffers Thurston County (current) 50-300 feet Thurston County (proposed) 50-300 feet Lewis County Mason County Grays Harbor County Pierce County City of Olympia City of Lacey City of Tumwater City of Yelm City of Rainier City of Tenino 25-300 feet 25-250 feet 40-300 feet 25-300 feet 50-300 feet 50-300 feet 25-300 feet 50-300 feet 25-300 feet 25-300 feet *Standard buffer width ranges; adjustments are provided for in each jurisdiction s regulations

Wetland Buffer Determination Various approaches Habitat score/water quality from Wetland Rating System Land Use (LU) Intensity Thurston County proposal is based on: Habitat scores from Wetland Rating System, Distances required to protect specific wetland types/water quality County does not receive permits for many activities covered by Ecology LU intensity table (handout)

Replacement of Wetlands Several jurisdictions allow for Cat. III and IV wetlands Refer to handout

Scenarios for Future Meetings Planned Scenario (Category II wetland) Single family home application on 5 acres Assuming BMPs in order to decrease buffer Will analyze how final buffer widths compare based on: Current CAO Draft proposal Ecology guidance Surrounding jurisdictions And any other PC suggestions

Next Steps Release remaining draft chapters, including: Definitions Administrative Procedures Critical Area chapters (CARAs, Geo. Hazards, Frequently Flooded Areas, FWHCAs) Special Reports Critical Area Permit Reasonable Use Exception Continue work sessions with Planning Commission

Thurston County Planning Department To sign up for webmail updates from the Planning Department, please visit: www.thurstonplanning.org