BS 476: Part 7: 1997 on K-Flex IN Clad Foil. Prepared for: L'Isolante K-Flex Srl Via Leonardo da Vinci, RONCELLO (MB) Italy

Similar documents
Classification of reaction to fire performance in accordance with BS EN : A1: 2009 on Sandwich Panel, WP 50.

Classification of reaction to fire performance in accordance with EN : A1: 2009 on Superfoil SFNC. Prepared for:

Test report for a Teldor Cables SLA-6-01X08- ZAHRH-DD Fibre Optic cable to IEC :1999

Review Fire Test Report

Indicative hoarding fire experiment. Prepared for: London Fire Brigade. 21 May 2014 Client report number

BS 6387: 1994 Specification for performance requirements for cables required to maintain circuit integrity under fire conditions.

BS 476: Part 3: External Fire Exposure Roof Test. WF Report Number: Date: 28 th April Test Sponsor: Tapco Europe Limited

BS 476: Part 3: External Fire Exposure Roof Test. WF Report Number: Date: 13 th October Test Sponsor: Tapco Europe Limited

BS EN : Measurements Of Smoke Density Of Electric Cables. WF Report Number. Date: 17 th November Test Sponsor:

BS EN ISO : 2010

Method of test defined in IEC for determining the circuit integrity performance of a cable under fire conditions.

BS 476: Part 6: 1989+A1:2009

Personal Protection Systems (PPS)

BS EN ISO 1716: Determination Of The Heat Of Combustion For Building Products

BS EN ISO : Fire Tests For Determination Of The Burning Behaviour of Floorings. WF Report Number. Date: 16 th November 2009.

BS EN :2004. Test On Electric And Optical Fibre Cables Under Fire Conditions. WF Report Number. Date: 14 th November 2008.

BS EN : 2001 & IEC :2000

BS EN ISO : 2010

BS EN 13823: A Report To: Contra Vision. Document Reference: Date: 25 th November Issue No.: 1

BS 476: Part 6: 1989+A1:2009

BS EN :2004. Test On Electric And Optical Fibre Cables Under Fire Conditions. WF Report Number. Date: 14 th November 2008.

IMO Resolution MSC 61 (67) 1996; Annex 1, Part 2. Smoke & Toxicity Test. WF Report Number: Date: 13 th August Test Sponsor:

Ad-hoc IEC Ad-hoc investigation to determine the fire performance of a cable junction box, using the principles of IEC

Ad-hoc IEC Ad-hoc investigation to determine the fire performance of a cable junction box, using the principles of IEC

BCTC CARPET TECHNICAL CENTRE

BS EN ISO : 2010

NF X : Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5

WARRES No Page 1 of 27. Fire Resistance Test Generally In Accordance With BS 476: Part 22: 1987, Clause 5, on an Insulated Fabric Barrier

IMO Resolution MSC 61(67): Annex 1: Part 2

Loss Prevention Standard

BS EN 13823: A Report To: Durabuild Technologies Pvt. Limited. Document Reference: Date: 22 nd February Issue No.

Technical evaluation of the Ningbo Longmax Electronic Co., Ltd LM-201A battery operated carbon monoxide (CO) Detector Type B to EN :2010.

Test Report: ICL/CR15/11/087

CLASSIFICATION OF REACTION TO FIRE PERFORMANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH EN :2007+A1:2009

Standards and third party certification

IEC Method of test defined in IEC / -21 for determining the circuit integrity of electric cables under fire conditions

CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL No ME 5085

Loss Prevention Standard

Loss Prevention Standard

Review of reports and data for Aero-Therm thermal reflective coating. Prepared for: Mr Craig Clement Director

Abrasion Resistance of Fluoropolymer and polyester Coatings

Contact person Date Reference Page Richard Johansson P (2) Fire Research

REACTION TO FIRE CLASSIFICATION REPORT No. RA ACCORDING TO THE EUROPEAN STANDARD NF EN A1:2013

BS 5839: Part THE CHANGES

Report Number BTC 15450A

Guidance Note. 3. Fire Propagation and flame Flame Spread in in Powder Coatings. Abrasion Resistance of Fluoropolymer and polyester Coatings

FUNDERMAX GMBH FIRE TEST REPORT

Analysis Report

CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL No CF 5236 EMVER PAINTS INDUSTRIES LLC

REACTION TO FIRE CLASSIFICATION REPORT No. RA ACCORDING TO THE EUROPEAN STANDARD NF EN A1:2013

REACTION TO FIRE CLASSIFICATION REPORT No. RA ACCORDING TO THE EUROPEAN STANDARD NF EN A1:2013

CLASSIFICATION OF REACTION TO FIRE PERFORMANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH EN :2007+A1:2009

CLASSIFICATION OF REACTION TO FIRE PERFORMANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH EN :2007+A1:2009

Classification report

CLASSIFICATION OF REACTION TO FIRE PERFORMANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH EN :2007+A1:2009

EN : A Report To: Poliuretanos S.A. Document Reference: (Issue 2), (Issue 2) & (Issue 4) Date: 13 th February 2015

FABRITRAK SYSTEMS, INC. FIRE TEST REPORT

TFI Report Classification

Additional reaction to fire classification report No H

Test Report: ICL/H18/9039 Rev 1

Title: Fire resistance test utilising the general principles of BS 476: Part 20: 1987 on four specimens of Uninsulated Air Valves.

REACTION TO FIRE CLASSIFICATION REPORT No. RA ACCORDING TO THE EUROPEAN STANDARD NF EN A1:2013

SIGMADEK, LTD. FIRE TEST REPORT

Forbo Flooring Attn. Mr. A. Tijhof Postbus AA Krommenie. Report. Sponsor : Contractor, manufacturer : Forbo Flooring. Lot. No. : 66869/3877.

Test on extruded rigid PVC profile for concrete formwork at 50 kw/m² irradiance in

Fire Performance of external thermal insulation for walls of multistorey buildings

TEST REPORT. Fire tests of construction products in compliance with the following standard:

CLASSIFICATION OF REACTION TO FIRE PERFORMANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH EN :2007+A1:2009

FIRE PERFORMANCE CABLE

Department for Communities and Local Government Research Report:

Test Report No. AJHG FB Date: FEB.17, 2015 Page 1 of 13

Loss Prevention Standard

Reaction to fire classification report No C-rev.1

ENHANCED FIRE PERFORMANCE CABLE

CLASSIFICATION REPORT

CLASSIFICATION OF REACTION TO FIRE PERFORMANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH EN :2007+A1:2009

TEST REPORT. Report No.: E Test Date: May 6, Rendered to: FUNDERMAX GMBH A-9300 St. Veit an der Glan, Austria

The Fire Resistance Performance Of Timber Or Mineral Composite Based Insulated Doorsets When Fitted With D & E Architectural Hardware Spring Hinges

Title: The Air Leakage Performance of Timber Doorsets fitted with NOR710 Smoke Seals in Accordance with BS 476: Part 31, Section 31.

TEST REPORT. Report No.: D Rendered to: 3M COMPANY St. Paul, Minnesota

TFI Report Reaction to fire test

Test report. NanoPhos coating system EPR and EEN. Name of client: NanoPhos SA. Date: Pages: 5 Encl.: 1 Ref: BP / KTO

Legal Requirements. There is no general legal requirement to install sprinklers. in places of work

TFI Report Classification

Agrément Certificate 92/2841 website: Product Sheet 1

CLASSIFICATION OF REACTION TO FIRE PERFORMANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH EN :2007+A1:2009

Reaction to fire classification report No C

MULTIKWIK SEWER SYSTEMS MULTIKWIK WC PAN CONNECTORS

SLIP RESISTANCE TESTING OF ENDURO-MESH PANEL

2 Examination of Cladding Panels (Laboratory)

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION TEST REPORT. Rendered to: GREENFIELD MANUFACTURING COMPANY. PRODUCT: Hanger Screws

Fire and Security Products and Services

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

CLASSIFICATION OF REACTION TO FIRE PERFORMANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH EN :2007+A1:2009

Classification Report

Operations Bulletin. Bulletin 110 Use of Electronic Water Sensors 4 th June 2018

Test Report No: ICL/H17/7967

REPORT NUMBER: SAT-001B ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: February 29, 2016 REVISED DATE:

SHOP PRIMERS FOR CORROSION PROTECTION OF STEEL PLATES AND SECTIONS

fire resistance testing

Transcription:

BS 476: Part 7: 1997 on K-Flex IN Clad Foil Prepared for: L'Isolante K-Flex Srl Via Leonardo da Vinci, 36 20877 RONCELLO (MB) Italy 30 th October 2012 0578 Page 1 of 6

Prepared on behalf of BRE Global by Name P J Potter Position Technician Signature Approved on behalf of BRE Global by Name S Howard Position Principal Consultant Date 30 th October 2012 Signature BRE Global Bucknalls Lane Watford Herts WD25 9XX T + 44 (0) 1923 664100 F + 44 (0) 1923 664994 E enquiries@breglobal.com www.breglobal.com BRE Global is not UKAS accredited to make opinions and interpretation. Any opinions and interpretations included as part of this report are clearly marked as such. 0578 This report may only be distributed in its entirety and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract. Test results relate only to the items tested. We have no responsibility for the design, materials, workmanship or performance of the product or items tested. This report does not constitute an approval, certification or endorsement of the product tested. This report is made on behalf of BRE Global. By receiving the report and action on it, the client accepts that no individual is personally liable in contract, tort or breach of statutory duty (including negligence). No third party has any right to rely on this report. Page 2 of 6

1 Objective To test and classify the sample described in Section 2 to the surface spread of flame characteristics, as shown by the surface spread of flame test and criteria of British Standard 476: Part 7 : 1997 1. 2 Sample 2.1 Traceability The test samples were supplied by the test sponsor. BRE Global were not involved in the sample selection process and therefore cannot comment upon the relationship between samples supplied for test and the product supplied to market. 2.2 Description of sample and test format. Unless otherwise stated all measurements are nominal. Test Sponsor Manufacturer of sample Sample name/reference Sample description (as provided by test sponsor/manufacturer) Description of specimens (as received) Mean sample weight per unit area (kg/m 2 ) L'Isolante K-Flex Srl Via Leonardo da Vinci, 36 20877 RONCELLO (MB) Italy Not given K-Flex IN Clad Foil K-Flex IN Clad Foil, chlorinated polymers with fillers and flame retarders 1mm thick, density 1,7 g/cm3 colour grey Adhered to steel substrate, 1mm thick, using glue K-414 Grey rubber like material adhered to metal sheet 8.0 Sample thickness (as 2.3 measured) (mm) Sample receipt date 4 th October 2012 Test face Test format K-Flex IN Clad Foil The specimens were tested with 12mm calcium silicate boards behind/. Date of test 19 th October 2012 Page 3 of 6

3 Conditioning The specimens were conditioned as required by the standard. 4 Results 4.1 Flame spread data Table 1 shows the observed spread of flame for each specimen at 1.5 minutes, 10 minutes and time to reach maximum flame spread distance. Table 2 shows the time it takes to reach each reference point in seconds if applicable. Table 1 Test Run Specimen Flame spread distance at 1.5 minutes (mm) Flame spread distance at 10 minutes (mm) Time to reach maximum flame spread distance (minutes:seconds) 1 1 70 70 0:45 2 2 75 75 0:37 3 3 70 70 0:35 4 4 75 75 0:52 5 5 75 75 0:37 6 6 70 70 0:42 Table 2 Test run Specimen Time to reach each reference point (mm) in minutes:seconds 75 165 190 215 240 265 290 375 455 500 525 600 675 710 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 Page 4 of 6

4.2 Observations. Specimen Observations 1 Sustained flaming ceased at 60 seconds with the extinction of the pilot flame. Transient flaming up to 190mm continued to approximately 5 minutes 2 Sustained flaming ceased at 60 seconds with the extinction of the pilot flame. Transient flaming up to 160mm continued to approximately 4minutes:30seconds 3 Sustained flaming ceased at 60 seconds with the extinction of the pilot flame. Transient flaming up to 160mm continued to approximately 5 minutes 4 Sustained flaming ceased at 60 seconds with the extinction of the pilot flame. Transient flaming up to 190mm continued to approximately 5 minutes 5 Sustained flaming ceased at 60 seconds with the extinction of the pilot flame. Transient flaming up to 200mm continued to approximately 4minutes:30seconds 6 Sustained flaming ceased at 60 seconds with the extinction of the pilot flame. Transient flaming up to 190mm continued to approximately 5 minutes 5 Classification Exposed surfaces of materials used as linings for walls and ceilings are classified in Section 11 of the standard according to the rate and distance of spread of flame across them as shown in Table 3. Table 3 Classification Spread of flame at 1.5min Final spread of flame Limit Limit for one specimen in sample Limit Limit for one specimen in sample mm mm mm mm Class 1 165 165 + 25 165 165 + 25 Class 2 215 215 + 25 455 455 + 45 Class 3 265 265 + 25 710 710 + 75 Class 4 Exceeding the limits of Class 3 Page 5 of 6

6 Conclusion The results of this test show that the above sample as described in this report, when tested and classified in accordance with BS 476 : Part 7 : 1997, achieved Class 1.. 7 Validity The test results relate only to the behaviour of the test specimens of the product under the particular conditions of the test; they are not intended to be the sole criterion for assessing the potential fire hazard of the product in use. The specification and interpretation of fire test methods are the subject of ongoing development and refinement. Changes in associated legislation may also occur. For these reasons it is recommended that the relevance of test reports over 5 years old should be considered by the user. The laboratory that issued the report will be able to offer, on behalf of the legal owner, a review of the procedures adopted for a particular test to ensure that they are consistent with current practices, and if required may endorse the test report. 8 Reference 1. Fire tests on building materials and structures. Part 7. Method of test to determine the classification of the surface spread of flame of products. British Standard 476 : Part 7 : 1997. British Standards Institution, London, 1997. ==============REPORT ENDS============= Page 6 of 6