Bidwell Ranch Conservation and Mitigation. management practices, costs, monitoring. Once these goals are finalized, the

Similar documents
5 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES ELEMENT

Antioch Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan

III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

APPENDIX C NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN: ACTIONS AND PRIORITIES

Policy & Procedure Effective Date: Parks Department Page of

Vernal Pool Creation in the Sacramento Valley: A Review of the Issues Surrounding Its Role as a Conservation Tool

EACCS Goal: provide guidelines for mitigation practices and overall conservation in east Alameda County

McArthur Swamp Planning Unit. Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat MCARTHUR SWAMP PLANNING UNIT

APPENDIX C SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS

ADDENDUM TO BIOLOGICAL SCOPING SURVEY REPORT, BOTANICAL SURVEY AND WETLAND DELINEATION

SITE INTRODUCTIONS AND OVERVIEW

STEWARDSHIP OF LONG ISLAND SOUND S ECOLOGICAL AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES

Presentation to Parks and Open Space Advisory. Committee September 22, 2016

TOWN OF SPRINGFIELD, NEW HAMPSHIRE

Rocky Areas Project Guidance HABITAT

The scope of the plan will focus on the Prospect Heights Slough and Hillcrest Lake as one entity.

RIPARIAN HABITAT RESTORATION. Helen Swagerty Senior Restoration Biologist/Project Manager

2011 ASLA Design Awards. Coyote Gulch Honor Award and Land Stewardship Designation Valerian LLC. Environmental Restoration and Reclamation

Planning for Staten. Habitat Restoration and Green Infrastructure. Island s North Shore

APPENDIX 1: SCOPED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) FORM

Burrowing Owl Habitat Project at the Albany Plateau. (a component project of the Gilman Street Playing Fields Project City of Berkeley) March 10, 2006

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET ARROYO PROJECTS

Northern Branch Corridor SDEIS March 2017

Goleta Community Plan Update

systems is available on the Colorado Wetland Information Center (CWIC) website.

Overview of Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission s (SPC) 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)

Leduc Industrial Outline Plan SE W4

ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. Proposed Relocation for Ninth Line, Markham and Whitchurch-Stouffville. Environmental Screening Report

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4

CHINO HILLS CHINO HILLS. September 6, 2012 OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN

City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission

3.10 LAND USE SETTING PROJECT SITE EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING. General Plan Land Use Designations.

NORTHEAST RIVER CROSSING FUNCTIONAL PLANNING STUDY

Canyon Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting March 18, 2016

ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 404 MASTER PLANNING

City of Lafayette Staff Report

7.0 SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

Florida s Ephemeral Ponds and Pond-Breeding Amphibians

Department of Community Development. Planning and Environmental Review Division Revised Notice of Preparation

Chapter 3 Site Planning and Low Impact Development

Rockwell Collins Green Communities Grant Application

THREE-STEP DESIGN PROCESS FOR OPEN SPACE SUBDIVISIONS

A Landowner s Guide to Creating Woodland Pools for Amphibians and Other Wildlife

GREEN SHEET ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS FOR THE IOWA HIGHWAY 100 EXTENSION

The Napa River Flood Protection Project

CHAPTER 2 SUMMARY 1. PROJECT SUMMARY DATA

Countywide Green Infrastructure

Lewisville Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 2 & 4, 2017

ANDERSON RIVER PARK SIDE CHANNEL HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECT. Public Outreach Meeting June 5, 2017

BASS PONDS, MARSH, & WETLAND HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECT

2011 ASLA Design Awards. Westside Creeks Restoration Plan Merit Award AECOM, Fort Collins. Planning & Urban Design

Draft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

New Tools for Land Management: A Quick Introduction to Ecological Site Descriptions

Planning for Staten. Habitat Restoration and Green Infrastructure. Island s North Shore

Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

Vaughan Metropolitan Centre (VMC) Black Creek Renewal CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

The Illinois Department of Transportation and Lake County Division of Transportation. Route 173, including the Millburn Bypass

AGENDA ITEM: IOWA. west] that were not FISCAL IMPACT. the City of Clive. STAFF REVIEW. Resolution II. Amendment PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY:

FINAL NATOMAS BASIN HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN SACRAMENTO AND SUTTER COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA. April Prepared By:

HAZARD MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

RESPONSES TO PUBLIC CONCERNS AND QUESTIONS

Natomas Joint Vision Open Space Plan

San Francisco Bay Area Upland Habitat Goals Project

PCE PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR WESTWOOD MIXED USE NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT 772 NORTH FOREST ROAD TOWN OF AMHERST, ERIE COUNTY, NEW YORK

Green Infrastructure Project Guidance

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

STREAM BUFFERS

Environmental Resources Branch

RECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND GREENWAYS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Arana Gulch Park Master Plan

Chapter 5: Natural Resources and Environment

INTRODUCTION Key Issues and Findings Goals, Objectives, and Policies - Natural Resources - Map M18 - Environmental Resources

Technical Memorandum 5

Green Infrastructure Policies and Ordinances

Community Conservation Workshop. Saranac River Basin Communities

Restoration in the Sky Islands:

New Brighton Park Shoreline Habitat Restoration Project

PROJECT BACKGROUND. Preliminary Design Scope and Tasks

Guiding Landowners in Stream Restoration. The Science, Practice & Art of Restoring Native Ecosystems 2015

Section 4 BUILDING THE MASTER PLAN

ARROYO PROJECTS ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET

Joe Pool Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 23, 2017

John R Trainor Park Bidwell Park Bidwell-Sacramento River SP SITE Lake Oroville State Rec Area Alpine Park

Community Conservation Workshop. Lake Placid

Zoning Ordinance Article 3

Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative. Introduction

PG&E WINTERS GAS OPERATIONS AND TECHNICAL TRAINING CENTER

Hiawatha Drain County Drain or Habitat Restoration?

glenwood canyon design process I-70 Statement of Direction TRG Recreation Subcommittee Colorado Division of Highways August 11, 1976 prepared by the

Stormwater Retrofitting: The Art of Opportunity. Presented by the Center for Watershed Protection

ROBERT SIBLEY VOLCANIC REGIONAL PRESERVE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT COMMUNITY MEETING #2 NOVEMBER 16, 2016

CHECKLIST FOR PHASE II DRAINAGE REPORT

Natural Resource Protection

APWA Expo August 27, Ground Water Recharge With Storm Management: A Sustainable Development

Integrated Vegetation Management Project Guidance

Arkansas River Corridor

G A R Y G R E E N L I N K APPENDIX A

Silverwood Masterplan Kickoff Meeting. Jim Neidhart Dane County Parks Planning

Transcription:

March 2008 Features of Proposed Bank: Provide an important ecological link to a network of existing conservation oriented properties. Permanently protect biological and cultural resources, viewsheds, and open space. Protect vernal pool species. Restore vernal pools and swales. Expand the onsite Butte County meadowfoam population. Increase blue oak woodlands. Develop a comprehensive management plan that addresses multiple objectives. Support goals of the Butte County Habitat Conservation Plan (in progress). Bidwell Ranch Conservation and Mitigation Bank Prospectus Introduction The City of Chico with assistance from River Partners is developing a conservation and mitigation bank on the Bidwell Ranch property. Purpose of Prospectus This prospectus briefly introduces the site and presents an initial conceptual design for the Bidwell Ranch Conservation and Mitigation Bank (Bank). As part of the Preliminary Bank Agreement Package (Figure 1), the Overall Goal The Butte County property occupies 759 acres of vernal pools, grasslands, and oak woodlands on the doorstep of Chico s Upper Bidwell Park. Prospectus presents the goals, target resources, and conceptual design of the Bank, and is intended to stimulate feedback from the Mitigation Bank Review Team and the public to help refine Bank goals. Over the past 20 years, the site has been considered repeatedly for development, potentially threatening ecological resources and functions. The project provides an opportunity to protect sensitive habitat and provide local mitigation options. Once these goals are finalized, the management practices, costs, monitoring protocol, and other information will then be refined and incorporated into future documents (Figure 1). The primary goal of the project is to establish a conservation and mitigation bank for the City of Chico that benefits natural resources and the local community. This prospectus lays out a preliminary conceptual framework for the Bank to solicit input from the Mitigation Bank Review Team. Timely input will enable the project to move forward to meet its ecological and community goals. Figure 1. Bidwell Ranch Conservation and Mitigation Bank Documents The project is designed to evolve with agency and public input.

Page 2 Bidwell Ranch Conservation and Mitigation Bank Prospectus Figure 2. Regional Location of Bidwell Ranch. Regional and Local Benefits Creation of a Bank would provide the following regional and local benefits: Provide a local option to mitigate for City capital projects. Table 1 provides recent examples of City projects that required mitigation. Provide an urban growth boundary on the eastern edge of the community and protect adjacent resources. Offer open space and mitigation options for local projects. The population of Chico is anticipated to increase by 48,121 by 2030 (using a 2% growth estimate) adding approximately 20,000 new residences and new pressures on the local ecosystem. Preserve a key foothill/valley ecotone that harbors the most environmentally sensitive resources in the region. The Chico Green Line protects farmland from development to the west, which in turn applies development pressure to environmentally sensitive areas like Bidwell Ranch to the north, east, and south of the community. Protect an important community viewshed on the doorstep of Bidwell Park. Bidwell Ranch was proposed several times for development, and though currently zoned Open Space, there is no permanent mechanism for protection of the natural resources on site. Table 1. Recent Mitigation Requirements for City Capital Projects. Project BCM a (acres) Vernal Pools (acres) Seasonal wetlands and others (acres) Other resources (acres) Cohasset Road Widening 3.2 2.6 0.47 Eaton Road Extension N/A 6.4 N/A 4.29 b State Highway 32 Widening 0.92 3.8 0.393 20.82 b 6.762 c Bruce Road Widening 1.33 Unknown Unknown Unknown Source: Vieg 2007. a Butte County Meadowfoam b Swainson s hawk. c Giant garter snake.

Bidwell Ranch Conservation and Mitigation Bank Prospectus Site Information Visitors to Bidwell Ranch are greeted with broad panoramas of the foothills and valley. The site contains a surprising variety of microhabitats, topography, soils, and hydrology. Some salient feature include: Bidwell Ranch is a link in a series of conservation properties that stretch from the Chico Municipal Airport to deep into the foothills (Figure 3). Generally, the site slopes to the west and southwest, but considerable topography (Figure 4) and seven different soil series provide a complex diversity of conditions. The property is located on the edge of the Sacramento Valley and Cascade foothills (Figure 5). The site lies adjacent to the developed urban edge of the City. Annual grasslands cover most of the site with vernal pools dotting lower, flatter areas. Blue oak woodland occupies small pockets of the site. Native plants (including Butte County meadowfoam) occur throughout the site, but especially noticeable in seasonal wetlands. Non-native plants (including medusa head, soft chess, and erodium) are more prevalent in upland areas. Grazing appears to have suppressed some non-native invasive plants such as yellow star thistle and foxtail fescue. Historically, Bidwell Ranch was at the edge of a much larger vernal pool landscape (Figure 7). Grading (presumably to drain vernal pools for grazing or possibly associated with the creation of the Sycamore Creek Diversion Channel, which runs along the western property boundary of Bidwell Ranch) occurred in the 1970 s or early 1980 s in the southwestern corner of the site. The gradient change associated with the Sycamore Creek Diversion Channel is causing head cuts as swales plunge from the site into the entrenched channel. This erosion impacts on site vernal pools and the retention of soil moisture. Management issues and opportunities are illustrated in Figures 8-15. Page 3 Figure 3. Conservation and Open Space Property Links to Bidwell Ranch. As a bank, Bidwell Ranch would fit into a network of conservation and open space properties from the valley floor to deep into the foothills.

Page 4 Bidwell Ranch Conservation and Mitigation Bank Prospectus Figure 4. Bidwell Ranch Topography. Figure 5. Geologic Setting for Bidwell Ranch. Bidwell Ranch Facts Proposed Bank Name: Bidwell Ranch Conservation and Mitigation Bank. Size: Approximately 759 acres. Location: Chico, Butte County, California. Adjacent Land Use: East and north (private), south (Upper Bidwell Park), west (Sycamore Creek Diversion Channel, Foothill Park East Preserve; and various private landowners). Ownership: City of Chico. Zoning: Primary Open Space. Climate: Mediterranean (hot, dry summers and wet mild winters). Geology: Transition between the volcanic Cascades and the alluvial Sacramento Valley. The Tuscan formation and Quaternary alluvium underlie the site. Watershed: Drainages on site feed into Sycamore Creek Diversion Channel, which flows into Sycamore Creek and eventually to Big Chico Creek (Figure 2). As a relatively low elevation watershed, Big Chico Creek tributaries are flashy with flows fluctuating widely with winter rains. Hydrology: Site contains over 350 vernal pools, several ephemeral drainages, and other seasonal features. Plant Communities: Annual grassland, vernal pools, blue oak woodland, and riparian woodland. Species: Over 100 plant and 40 animal species have been observed, including listed and special status species (Table 2). Cultural Resources: Historic Native American uses have been documented on site. Public Interest: The community has expressed great interest in this property for over 20 years and a Citizen Work Group has been established for the project.

Bidwell Ranch Conservation and Mitigation Bank Prospectus Endangered and Threatened Species Known or Potentially Present Table 2. Potential Species to be Considered for the Project*. Common Name Scientific Name Federal ESA State ESA CNPS Observed Onsite Potential to Benefit from Bank Activities Adobe lily Fritillaria pluriflora - - 1B N? Ahart's nailwort Paronychia ahartii - - 1B Y? Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Delisted E NA Y L Burrowing owl Athene cunicularia - C NA Y Y Butte County checkerbloom Sidalcea robusta - - 1B N? Butte County meadowfoam Limnanthes floccosa ssp. californica E E 1B Y Y California fairy shrimp Linderiella occidentalis C C NA Y Y Conservancy fairy shrimp Branchinecta conservatio E - NA N Y Golden eagle Aquila chrysaetos - C NA Y L Loggerhead shrike Lanius ludovicianus - C NA Y Y Long-billed curlew Numenius americanus - C NA Y L Pallid bat Antrozous pallidus - C NA N L Peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus - E NA Y L Swainson s hawk Buteo swainsoni - T NA N Y Valley elderberry longhorn beetle Desmocerus californicus dimorphus T - NA N Y Vernal pool fairy shrimp Branchinecta lynchi T - NA Y Y Vernal pool tadpole shrimp Lepidurus packardi E C NA Y Y Western spadefoot toad Spea hammondii - C NA Y Y * Abbreviations: ESA-Endangered Species Act, E- Endangered, T-Threatened, C- Species of Concern; Y-Yes, N-No, L-Limited. Wetland Description Substantial hydraulic information on the site is available (EDAW 2007, JSA 1994) including an Army Corps verified wetland delineation from 1991 and a preliminary wetland delineation from 2007 (Table 3 and Figure 6). Surface water not captured by vernal pools drains into the Sycamore Creek Diversion Channel (Figure 4). Incision of ephemeral channels and headcuts have reduced the capacity of the site to retain water (Figures 8-11). Vernal pools on site are numerous and are generally small and associated with hardpans. Large areas of clay flats are present on site (Figures 6 and 7). Grading, evident on the southwestern corner of the site (Figures 8-10), has impacted historic wetland patterns (Figure 7). Page 5 Table 3. Comparison of Wetland Delineations on Bidwell Ranch Feature Wetland Area (JSA 1991) (acres) Wetland Area (TES 2007) (acres) Wetlands Vernal Pools 7.839 (358 pools) 3.4 (347 pools) Vernal Swales -- 7.89 Clay Flats 36.703 34.1 Ephemeral Drainage 12.816 -- Intermound Ephemeral Drainage 11.27 8.49 Total Wetlands 68.628 53.89 Other Waters Ephemeral Creeks -- 8.83 Other Waters 7.685 -- Total Other Waters 7.685 8.83 Total Waters of the U.S. 76.313 62.72

Page 6 Bidwell Ranch Conservation and Mitigation Bank Prospectus Figure 6. 2007 Wetland Delineation (TES 2007).

In 1941 Bidwell Ranch was at the edge of a much larger vernal pool landscape. Figure 7. 1941 Aerial Photo of Project Area. Bidwell Ranch Conservation and Mitigation Bank Prospectus Page 7

Page 8 Bidwell Ranch Conservation and Mitigation Bank Prospectus Figure 8. Collection of Topographical Data. Figure 9. Detailed Topography of the Southwest Corner. Additional topographical information and the analysis of past aerial photographs may aid the development of enhancement options in the southwestern corner of the site, referred to on page 10. Figure 10. View of Potential Enhancement Area. Figure 11. Headcuts along the Diversion Channel. Evidence of past grading is apparent in the southwest corner of Bidwell Ranch. Repairing headcuts provide the opportunity to retain water on site and protect and enhance vernal pools and swales.

One culvert funnels diffuse low velocity flows (left) into a more concentrated channel (right). Figure 14. Effect of Culverts. Although mostly fenced, unauthorized ATV use occurs on site. Figure 15. Figure 13. View of Access Road (easement) near Upper Park. Figure 12. Unauthorized use in Northeast Corner of Site. Blue oak woodlands could be expanded with plantings and management changes. Oak Woodland Occupies Small Areas of the Site. Moving the fence from Upper Bidwell Park (left) to the Bidwell Ranch side of the road (right) will allow users access and protect sensitive resources on site and in the park. Page 9 Bidwell Ranch Conservation and Mitigation Bank Prospectus

Page 10 Bidwell Ranch Conservation and Mitigation Bank Prospectus Conceptual Design of the Bidwell Ranch Conservation and Mitigation Bank General Concepts Concepts developed in this prospectus are preliminary and subject to change based on feedback from the agencies and the Citizen Work Group. Feedback on the approach will help refine the bank design and the selection of management actions. Guiding principals include: The Service Area is Butte County, especially near Chico. Management activities need to be protective of valuable existing ecological resources. Feedback on this conceptual approach will help refine the bank design and the development of management actions. Management actions will be responsive to agency input. Appropriate recreational and educational uses will be considered. Mitigation resources will be selected based on status, on site potential, mitigation demand (Tables 4 and 5), and agency input. Preliminary Conceptual Design Features Figure 16 presents a preliminary conceptual proposal for Bidwell Ranch. Brief descriptions of key conceptual design features include: The site will be divided into wetland and upland management units to better match actions with conditions and resource goals. The upland areas will include some isolated wetland features (i.e., drainages and pool complexes). Mitigation bank resources are divided into two categories: 1) Communities (i.e. blue oak woodland, vernal pools, etc.), and 2) Species (i.e. Butte County meadowfoam, vernal pool invertebrates, Swainson's hawk, western burrowing owl, etc.) (Table 4). Credits for restored or enhanced areas will attain specific, objective goals, before they are sold. Vernal pool enhancements range from simple actions to more intensive actions, including actions to: Install erosion control measures along the Sycamore Creek Diversion Channel and at culverts. Install grade control structures and retention areas, and manage cattle access in ephemeral channels to curtail incision and retain water in clay flats and nearby vernal pools. In turn, retention basins may potentially function as vernal features. Restore hydraulic functions in the degraded southwest corner. Minor grading to approximate past topography, such as removing the drainage ditch and/or recreating vernal pool basins, may improve habitat for vernal pool species. More intensive measures, such as grading undisturbed vernal pool complexes to mimic vernal pool hydrology are not included under this conceptual design (Figure 16). Expand the Butte County meadowfoam on site to areas with similar soil and hydraulic conditions. Minimal recruitment of blue oak seedlings is occurring on site. Appropriate micro-sites (typically north facing slopes, with relatively deep soil, and good drainage) could be planted to expand the oak woodlands. Plantings would be relatively low density and require considerable care for establishment. Artificial burrows could be created to expand opportunities for burrowing owl nesting. To better manage cattle and public access in sensitive areas new cross fencing could be installed between the wetland and upland management units. Located on the urban fringe of Chico, the site is currently subject to unauthorized foot, bike, and all terrain vehicle (ATV) use. The project will redirect the public to appropriate areas of the site to protect site resources and minimize damage to adjoining resources in Upper Bidwell Park. For example, changes to the existing trail system could include: Develop a corps of docents to educate the public and to help monitor usage. Simplify the road network and abandon roads, and re-route roads away from vernal pools. Restrict access (gates and signs) on seasonally sensitive areas and maintenance only roads. Develop measures to ban access of unauthorized ATVs (especially in northwest area). Relocate the south fence to the Bidwell Ranch side of the gravel road to protect the wetland unit onsite and the large vernal pools just offsite, in Upper Bidwell Park. This conceptual design and footprint of the project will evolve as additional feedback and information is incorporated into the project.

Bidwell Ranch Conservation and Mitigation Bank Prospectus Figure 16. Preliminary Conceptual Proposal. This preliminary conceptual design is intended as a working draft to stimulate feedback from the agencies and the public. Page 11

Page 12 Bidwell Ranch Conservation and Mitigation Bank Prospectus Table 4. Biological Resources Proposed for Credits at Bidwell Ranch. Mitigation Resource Important Site Factors a Examples of Enhancement Actions b Data Gaps Blue oak woodland Minimal recruitment of new saplings. Planting additional areas with oaks, shrubs, grasses, and forbs. Soil assessment and microsite analysis. Site planting demonstration of oak acorns. Vernal pools Small topographical modifications may produce conditions that support vernal pool species. Butte County meadowfoam (BCM) Northern area of the site supports approximately 2.2 acres of BCM (Gallaway 2006). A tiered approach to: 1) design erosion control structures to restore and potentially expand vernal pools near the Sycamore Creek Diversion Channel, 2) regrade areas of the southwestern corner of the site disturbed from past activities, 3) create depressions and install erosion control structures in clay flat and ephemeral drainage areas to create vernal pool hydrology, and 4) create features in areas near vernal pools with appropriate topography and soils. Introduce BCM onto new areas to expand the population. Select areas with same soil series and characteristics as existing populations. This approach appears successful, based on information from the Wurlitzer Preserve (Kelley 2007). Agency feedback on more intensive approaches. Further assessment of potential enhancement areas to develop grading plans and biological goals. Review monitoring on adjacent vernal pool preserve for success in pool enhancement. Agency feedback on approach. Microsite evaluation and selection of release sites. Develop propagation information and monitoring approach from previous efforts. California fairy shrimp, Conservancy fairy shrimp, Vernal pool fairy shrimp, Vernal pool tadpole shrimp All species (except Conservancy Fairy Shrimp) observed on site (CNDDB 2007, JSA 1994a, Locke 2007). Develop measures as described above to favor target species (i.e., deepen pools for tadpole shrimp). Same as for vernal pool measures above. Swainson s hawk Nesting pair documented within 6 miles of site (Snowden 2007). Annual grassland on site provides foraging habitat. Control invasive non-native species, such as yellow-star thistle to improve foraging opportunities. Consider planting of native grass in appropriate areas. Development of oak woodlands could provide perching habitat. Agency feedback. Further evaluation of site as suitable habitat. Identify management goals and practices. Western burrowing owl Two owl pairs have been reported on site (TES 2007). They occupy cavities/pockets in rocky outcrops. Install artificial burrows to expand the on site population. Verification of current site population. Territory size and food source considerations for placement. a See River Partners 2007 for additional details. b Actions and resources protected will depend on agency feedback. A more refined bank design will be developed after this feedback.

Bidwell Ranch Conservation and Mitigation Bank Prospectus Page 13 Table 5. Biological Resources Considered But Not Proposed for Credits at Bidwell Ranch. Special-status Species Important Site Factors a Examples of Enhancement Actions b Data Gaps Adobe lily, Ahart's nailwort, Butte County checkerbloom Species found in area but not on site. Site conditions may support these species. These species may potentially be introduced to Bidwell Ranch. Golden eagle Observed foraging over site (JSA 1994). Current plan does not include credits for this resource. See measures to improve Swainson s hawk. Agency feedback. Consideration of mitigation needs, micro site characterization, and life history information. Agency Feedback. Further consideration of mitigation needs. Loggerhead shrike Observed foraging onsite (JSA 1994). The blue oaks onsite may provide nesting habitat for this species. Approach could include: 1) control of invasive nonnative plants to improve foraging habitat, 2) expansion of oak woodlands to improve nesting opportunities, and 3) additional barbed wire fencing (for cattle) installed could provide additional prey anchor areas (shrikes impale prey on thorns and wire). Agency feedback. Further consideration of mitigation needs. Long-billed curlew Provides seasonal habitat. Observed foraging in the grassland habitat on site (JSA 1994). Potential expansion of wetland areas could increase foraging areas. Agency feedback. Further consideration of mitigation needs. Pallid bat Not reported, but suitable foraging habitat and roosting habitat. Approach could include: 1) improve oak woodland and grassland areas, and 2) potentially install bat boxes. Peregrine falcon Observed over site (JSA 1994). Control of invasive non-native plants could improve foraging habitat (see Swainson s hawk actions). Valley elderberry longhorn beetle One elderberry observed on site (no exit holes). Western spadefoot toad Vocalizations heard during the breeding season on site (Shedd 2007) and along the Sycamore Creek Diversion Channel (Shedd 2007). Tadpoles observed within three miles of the site (CNDDB 2007). Plant host plant on site; however, appropriate areas are limited. These are likely to be isolated plants with few associates. Improved degraded wetlands in the southwestern portion of the site could improve populations. Agency feedback. Further consideration of mitigation needs and life history information. Agency feedback. Further consideration of mitigation needs. Agency feedback. Identification of additional data needs. Agency feedback. Further consideration of mitigation needs and life history information. a See River Partners 2007 for additional details. b Species not currently considered as part of the site s mitigation credit program. Actions and resources protected will depend on agency feedback. A more refined bank design will be developed after this feedback.

Page 14 Bidwell Ranch Conservation and Mitigation Bank Prospectus Bidwell Ranch History Management Plan Since 1982, the City has received multiple proposals to develop the Bidwell Ranch property. Projects have ranged in size from 4,668 to 1,500 residential units. Because of its location near Upper Bidwell Park and sensitive biological resources; development proposals for the site have been the subject of significant community debate and have spawned the creation of the Stop Bidwell Ranch coalition, a referendum, a lawsuit, and a settlement agreement. In 1997, the City of Chico purchased the property. Since the acquisition, the City Council has discussed alternative uses of the property, including selling portions of the property for private development. In 2005, on a 4-3 vote, the City Council rezoned the site as open space, and gave direction to investigate its use as a wetland mitigation bank to offset the expansion of the City s Municipal Airport and to mitigate for other capital projects. In 2006, the City and River Partners began work to develop a conservation and mitigation bank for Bidwell Ranch. Due to continued significant public interest in the site, a Citizen Work Group was developed to provide feedback and comment on draft documents and the bank creation process. CWG meetings and site tours are planned for the life of the project, and will play a key role in bank creation and site management. The concepts from this prospectus will be further refined and included in the management plan. The plan will develop the details necessary to carry out the goals of the project. The management plan will address such issues as: A description of the adaptive management model used to guide management activities. Identification of the long-term management entity. More detail on the size and/or numbers of resources available for mitigation credits. Performance standards for determining credit availability and bank success. Reporting protocols and a monitoring plan. Identification of immediate actions and long-term maintenance tasks. Cost Estimate for Management Once the concept is approved, costs will be developed for: Initial improvements, and Long-term maintenance and monitoring. This information will aid in the development of an annual budget and an endowment for the project, and development of project phases. North State Resources has developed a preliminary Property Analysis Record for Bidwell Ranch based on existing activities on site (NSR 2008). A baseline estimate of current management practices has been estimated annually at $25,000 (an endowment of $500,000). This is a baseline value that is anticipated to increase once the conceptual design has been approved and additional management actions identified. Identification of management activities and strategies, including a grazing plan, measures and infrastructure to minimize impacts and maximize the benefit to native plants, a comprehensive weed control plan, and listing of erosion control measures (including the retirement of specific roads). Contingency and remedial actions and responsibilities. Provisions for long-term management and maintenance. Prioritization of management activities and detailed designs (such as for erosion control structures). Additional information will help refine details of the Bank, but this prospectus should provide the Mitigation Bank Review Team with the general concept of the proposed bank. The project strives for an open, transparent process, and interested members of the public have joined the Citizen Work Group.

Bidwell Ranch Conservation and Mitigation Bank Prospectus Summary Page 15 This prospectus provides a brief overview of the Bidwell Ranch property and concepts that will guide the development of the property as a conservation and mitigation bank. As a bank, the property provides a unique opportunity to resolve several long-term issues. The project would: Permanently protect environmentally sensitive natural and cultural resources. Protect the site from development and create an urban growth boundary for the City. Enhance habitat for protected species. Create an important link in a network of con- servation oriented properties. Provide the City and other entities with biologically appropriate local options for mitigating future projects. Fund a mechanism for long-term site management. Provide educational and research opportunities. Develop measures to guide the public to appropriate areas and protect site resources and vernal pools in Upper Bidwell Park. Supports the goals of the in progress Butte County Habitat Conservation Plan. Offer a model for local municipalities to mitigate urban growth and protect local ecosystems. The project is in a critical stage, and timely agency input will greatly aid in the long term protection of the natural resources at this high profile site. References BCCER. June 2006. Watershed History. Big Chico Creek Ecological Reserve. Chico, CA. Accessed online June 2007 at: www.csuchico.edu/bccer/bcc_ecr/watershedhistory.htm California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). 2007. RareFind Version 3.1.1. California Department of Fish and Game. EDAW. 2007. Draft Bidwell Park Master Management Plan Update. City of Chico Park Division. Dan Efseaff and Colleen Martin. Chico, California. Shedd, Jackson. 2007. Personal Communications. Author of Amphibians and Reptiles of Bidwell Park. Snowden, Jim. 2007. Personal Communications. Retired California Department of Fish and Game employee. Gallaway. 2006. Bidwell Ranch Butte County Meadowfoam Survey. Gallaway Consulting, Inc. Chico, CA. TES. 2007. Delineation of Waters of the U.S. - Bidwell Property. Red Bluff, Tehama County, CA. Draft Report. Tehama Environmental Services. JSA 1994. Chico, City of. Community Development Department, Planning Division. June 1994. Draft Bidwell Ranch Specific Plan. Chico, CA. Prepared by Wade Associates, Urban Planning and Design. Roseville, CA. Kelley, D. 2007. Personal Communication. Soil Scientist. Kelley and Associates Environmental Sciences, Inc. TES (Greg Treber). 2007. Personal communication. Biologist. Tehama Environmental Solutions. Vieg, B. 2007. Bidwell Ranch Wetland Mitigation and Conservation Bank Needs Memo. City of Chico Memorandum to Dan Efseaff, River Partners. August 14, 2007. Locke, Hilary. 2007. Personal Communications. Bidwell Ranch Conservancy. NSR. 2008. Draft PAR for Long-term Management - Proposed Bidwell Ranch Conservation and Mitigation Bank. North State Resources. Chico, CA. River Partners. 2007. Site Inventory for Bidwell Ranch, Chico, Butte County, California. Draft. Additional information is available at http://www.riverpartners.org/wherewe-work/bidwell/documents.html Weather information and web cam is available at www.bidwellranchcam.com

Contact Information Brendan Vieg Senior Planner City of Chico 411 Main Street P.O. Box 3420 Chico, California 95927 Phone: 530-879-6806 Fax: 530-895-4726 E-mail: bvieg@ci.chico.ca.us web: www.chico.ca.us Dan Efseaff Restoration Ecologist River Partners 580 Vallombrosa Avenue Chico, California 95926 Phone: 530-894-5401 Fax: 530-894-2970 E-mail: info@riverpartners.org web: www.riverpartners.org Additional information is available on the River Partners webpage at http://www.riverpartners.org/where-we-work/bidwell/bidwell.html.