MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE

Similar documents
Alternatives Development Three conceptual alternatives were developed for the Race Road/Jessup Village Planning Study and are described below:

Highway 12 Sibley Avenue Reconstruction. Project Overview and Progress To Date Litchfield City Council April 17, 2017

CHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses

Preserving Green Streetscape Character on Hillside Drive

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 6A AGENDA ITEM ORIGINATING DEPT. AGENDA ITEM CITY ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL

MEMORANDUM. I2 District Downtown Parking Overlay District 24,000 square feet /.55 acres. Industrial Employment District North Loop Small Area Plan

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE

Municipality of Anchorage, Alaska Parks & Recreation Department

ARTICLE 13 STREETS General

Proposed Kenmount Hill CDS Amendment. Public Hearing October 25 th, 2018

Rezoning Transportation Analysis Petition Number: General Location Identifier:

July 12, Columbus City Council City Hall 90 West Broad Street Columbus, OH RE: I-70/71 Columbus Crossroads Project

December 1, 2014 (revised) Preliminary Report -- Thomas Jefferson Site Evaluation

TENNESSEE STATE ROUTE 109 CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT ALONG STATE ROUTE 109

SITE SELECTION STUDY. Municipality of Anchorage Anchorage School District Student Transportation Maintenance Facility

understanding Green Infrastructure In Zoning

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 6A AGENDA ITEM

Town of Portola Valley General Plan. Nathhorst Triangle Area Plan

McDonald s Restaurant - Purcellville Town of Purcellville Special Use Permit Statement of Justification July 24, 2014

UAA School of Engineering Parking Garage Master Plan Amendment. 1. Purpose

PLANNING COMMISSION Work Session Meeting Agenda

Report to City Council

COMMUNICATION URBAN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CITY OF DES MOINES, IOWA MAY 16, 2017 MEETING

Johnson Street Bridge Public Realm Update

The Illinois Department of Transportation and Lake County Division of Transportation. Route 173, including the Millburn Bypass

AVONDALE ESTATES GREENSPACE AD-HOC COMMITTEE

ADOPTION OF THE REVISED OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN

4.500 Preston Road Overlay District

ARTICLE 13 STREETS General

Local Growth Planning in North Central Green Line Communities

Main Street Reconstruction From Ninth Line to Stouffer Street. Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville. Public Information Centre

Access Management: An Overview

Municipality of Anchorage. Community Council Survey Capital Projects Needs Ranking Survey (ALPHABETICAL) Airport Heights

LOMA VISTA ROUND 1 - COMMUNITY WORKSHOP AND OPEN HOUSE SUMMARY

4-Town Comprehensive Plan DRAFT 7/30/07

Charles P. Johnson and Associates. Annapolis Landscape Architects

Whitemarsh Comprehensive Plan Update: Housing & Land Use. Public Workshop #3: September 20, 2018

8implementation. strategies

WELCOME! 8 8:30 6: TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Open House. Presentation & Q&A

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM

GENERAL INFORMATIONaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

The transportation system in a community is an

CITY OF PORTSMOUTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT. MEMORANDUM To: From:

STANDARD DETAILS QUICK REFERENCE

Downtown Lead Revitalization Project Final Recommendations. Three Proposed Options for the Revitalization of Downtown Lead

The principal elements of the NTC Strategic Vision plan are as follows.

City Council Special Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO. C.

SH 199 Corridor Master Plan. Community Meeting No. 2 May 31, 2017

Needs/Requests Related to UCSF Expansion Into Dogpatch. Neighborhood List UCSF Response and Community Discussion

PRELIMINARY PLAT DESIGN REQUIREMENTS Updated 4/8/2016

4.1.A NORTHWEST QUADRANT MASTER PLAN

CHAPTER 7: VISION AND ACTION STATEMENTS. Noble 2025 Vision Statement

Allen Street Civic District Redevelopment Area Plan Redevelopment Plan & Proposal State College Planning Commission State College Redevelopment

5. Spring Garden Planning Area (Secondary Plan added by OPA #05 11/29/2002)

Chapter 1 - General Design Guidelines CHAPTER 1 GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES

PART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY. Proposed Land Use: 120 single-family lots. The application is Attachment A. The site plan is Attachment B.

Proposed Walkability Ordinance for City of Knoxville (6/16/17)

MEMORANDUM. This memo deals with proposed amendments to previously issued Development Permit No for Park Royal North.

Ann Arbor Intermodal Station Environmental Review

General Location Courtyard at LMH Final Development Plan and Final Plat

Chapter 7: Streetscape & Design Elements

APPENDIX G: TOWN ORDINANCE REVIEW

14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC

PLANNING COMMISSION. Submitted

M E M O R A N D U M November 9, 2018

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

DRAFT PLAN PRESENTATION

COMPLETE GREEN STREET CHECKLIST

Re: Hazeldean Road - Minto Potters Key Subdivision Responses to Resident Concerns

Sewanee Village + Request for Builder/Developer Proposals

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

AGENDA ITEM: IOWA. west] that were not FISCAL IMPACT. the City of Clive. STAFF REVIEW. Resolution II. Amendment PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY:

BENJAMIN BANNEKER PARK FRAMEWORK PLAN (PLAN ADOPTION)

NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD PUD

VALLEY COUNTY MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR PRIVATE ROAD DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

4 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS

City of Yorba Linda Memorandum

Philip A. Ginsburg, General Manager Toks Ajike, Acting Planning and Capital Program Director

FDOT D4 Complete Streets

KASPER. City of Georgetown, Texas PUD Planned Unit Development. December 30, 2015 Revised January 27, 2016

2018 Woodhill Road Improvements Public Informational Meeting. September 28, :00 pm

Property Owners Association. Annual Meeting Notice July 26, :00pm - 7:00pm Park City Marriott 1895 Sidewinder Drive Park City, Utah

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 28, 2017 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

1999 Approval to replace World War I monument and relocate plaques Approval to rehabilitate the Chase Mill building and surrounding site

Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative. Introduction

Urban Planning and Land Use

Route 9 Gateway Project. October 9, 2014 Informational Meeting

MCKINNEY FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE MARSHAL S OFFICE FIRE LANES

Long Branch-Wayne Local Park Renovation Project

Public Workshop #2 Summary

Play areas overlooking climbing hill. School & playgrounds overlooking pond bottom ballfields. Project experience while at Loris and Associates, Inc.

Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place, Boston, Massachusetts fax

Raft Island Right of Way Vegetation and Tree Management Plan

East Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement

CHUGIAK-EAGLE RIVER SITE-SPECIFIC LAND USE PLAN

INFRASTRUCTURE EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE A. Circulation B. Signals C. Drainage D. Utilities

Request Alternative Compliance (Commercial Parking Lot in Restricted Area) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Ashby Moss

SFMTA PHELAN LOOP AND PUBLIC PLAZA PHELAN OCEAN AVENUE

Transcription:

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE ANCHORAGE PARKS & RECREATION Memorandum PRC 08-38 DATE: June 4, 2008 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Parks & Recreation Commission Monique Anderson, Parks Superintendent PRC 08-38 Creekside Park Request for transfer of parkland to 6 th Avenue ROW Introduction The 6 th Avenue Reconstruction project will upgrade approximately 2,600 linear feet of 6 th Avenue between Patterson Street and Muldoon Road to neighborhood collector standards. The MOA Department of Project Management & Engineering (PM&E) is responsible for this project. One of the project s key goals is to calm traffic along 6 th Avenue and Oklahoma Street near Creekside Park Elementary School. 6 th Avenue has approximately 600 linear feet of frontage along the north boundary of Creekside Park. In response to P&R Department and public comments about parking, the project design calls for the construction of approximately 20 parallel parking stalls located in the right-of-way adjacent to the park. An 8-foot wide multi-use pathway is located on the south side of 6 th Avenue adjacent to the park. It joins to existing multi-use pathways that travel south inside the Patterson Street right-of-way and west to stairs connecting to adjacent neighborhoods. The intersection of 6 th Avenue and Oklahoma Street was identified as an important pedestrian connection to the park and will be improved with new crosswalks at Oklahoma Street. Also at this intersection, a gateway feature is planned at the northeast corner of the park. The gateway creates an entry to an existing path traveling south between the elementary school ballfield and the park ballfield. The gateway has a baseball motif designed into its architecture and will be surrounded by tree and shrub plantings. Turnaround Design Concepts The project team identified a need for a turnaround at the west end of 6 th Avenue for emergency vehicles, maintenance equipment, those park users that would use the proposed parallel parking to access the park, mail delivery, trash collection, etc. Although a cul-de-sac is the typical provision to serve these needs, there is presently not sufficient right-of-way to construct a cul-de-sac. The design team explored eight alternatives for the termination at the west end of 6 th Avenue, including a T-shaped (hammerhead) turnaround and several potential layouts of a cul-de-sac. The hammerhead design was presented because it can be constructed within available right-of-way. However, neither the design team, PM&E, MOA Street Maintenance, nor the public favor the hammerhead design. The presence of a walkway serving Creekside Park Elementary School and the number of small children passing through the area is the key reason why the design team feels that it would be best to eliminate or reduce all backing maneuvers in this location. Of the seven cul-de-sac design alternatives considered, four were deemed to be sufficiently promising to advance. Alternatives 1, 2a, 4a and 7 are included in your staff packet. Alternative 7 was the design team s preferred cul-de-sac design and requires private property acquisitions to construct. On April 9, 2008, design team members Joel Stout (Lounsbury & Associates) and Anne Brooks (Public Involvement Coordinator) met with the two potentially affected property owners to gauge their willingness to sell the right-of-way needed to build Alternative 7. After consideration, on May 7 th, the property owners indicated they are not willing to sell property for the cul-de-sac. Since Alternative 7 represents the smallest impact to the private property owners to construct a cul-de-sac without affecting Creekside Park it is very doubtful that further efforts to acquire private property will be successful.

Without willing sellers, the only other feasible option for constructing a cul-de-sac rather than a hammerhead turnaround is to transfer a small portion (approximately 1,600 sf) of parkland to street rightof-way. Because a cul-de-sac would be far superior to a hammerhead turnaround, and because private property owners are not willing to sell the needed right-of-way, PM&E is seeking Parks and Recreation Department and Parks and Recreation Commission support to transfer a small portion of Creekside Park to right-of-way. Public Involvement Parks and Recreation Department staff outlined the process required to transfer dedicated public parkland to another public use (municipal purpose). We indicated our chief concern for the safety of pedestrians and park users and suggested that concepts were presented at a regularly noticed meeting of the Northeast Community Council for their discussion. So, on May 14, 2008, the project team took this information to the Northeast Community Council to inform the council about the proposal and to seek their input. NECC considered two motions related to the culde-sac. A motion to not allow the parkland transfer was defeated 11 to 3. The second motion supported PM&E s request to transfer parkland to right-of-way with a caveat. The NECC motion in support of the transfer which carried with 10/for, 3/against, and 4/abstain and was recorded as: "Use of approximately 1,600 sq/ft of parkland for the cul-de-sac and the vacation of the north Patterson Street right-of-way. We strongly urge the Parks Commission to dedicate the right-of-way as a pedestrian walkway between Debarr and 6th Avenue, minus what is needed for Wal-Mart's driveway." Discussion Department staff recognize the need for a vehicle turn around at the end of 6 th Avenue that provides safe pedestrian access as well as emergency and other vehicle technical requirements. Creekside Park is dedicated parkland by Assembly Ordinance 84-199. AMC 25.10.080 Use of municipal property for park or recreational purposes includes the following provision for parkland conversion: C. Except as otherwise prohibited by law or by conditions of ownership, the assembly, with recommendations from the planning and zoning commission and the parks and recreation commission, by ordinance, may allow the use of municipal land formally dedicated to public park or recreational purpose for another municipal purpose. The special procedure required by this subsection applies only to land dedicated by ordinance under this section. (AO No. 79-170; AO No. 81-88) The Department strongly supports the addition of 20 on-street parking spaces, the pedestrian walkway and gateway improvements as they are beneficial to both park users of Creekside Park as well as the neighborhood. We support the project team community outreach to the Northeast Community Council and recognize the community support to transfer 1,600 sq/ft of parkland to 6 th Avenue for the cul-de-sac and the dedication of North Patterson Street, between Debarr and 6 th as a pedestrian corridor. The vacation/dedication of ROW requires funding and would be best accomplished by PM&E. The 65% and 95% Review Plans will be customarily reviewed by P&R staff to provide guidance on tree protection, potential tree replacements and other design issues to blend the cul-de-sac into Creekside Park. Recommended Action NOW THEREFORE, The Parks and Recreation Commission supports the following conditions of the Northeast Community Council Resolution which states support for the transfer of parkland to 6 th Avenue ROW: Use of approximately 1,600 sf/ft of parkland (Creekside Park) for the (6 th Avenue) cul-de-sac and the vacation of the north Patterson Street right-of-way. And recommends that PM&E complete the formal vacation and dedication of the North Patterson Street right-of-way as a pedestrian walkway between Debarr and 6 th Avenue, minus what is needed for Wal- Mart s driveway. Attachments PM&E Project Summary for 6 th Avenue Reconstruction - #05-47 (5 pages) Landscape Improvements and Sections (4 pages) Turnaround Alternatives (4 pages)

Parks and Recreation Commission Agenda Item: Project Update Information Item Business Item SUBJECT: 6 th Avenue Reconstruction PROJECT NO.: PM&E Project No. 05-047 GROUP: MOA Parks and Recreation Commission DATE: May 20, 2008 PROJECT INFORMATION: PROJECT BACKGROUND The 6 th Avenue Reconstruction project will upgrade approximately 2,600 linear feet of 6 th Avenue between Patterson Street and Muldoon Road and approximately 770 linear feet of Oklahoma Street between 6 th Avenue and 4 th Avenue to neighborhood collector standards. The MOA Department of Project Management & Engineering (PM&E) is responsible for this project. One of the project s key goals is to calm traffic along 6 th Avenue and Oklahoma Street near Creekside Park Elementary School. OVERALL PROJECT SCOPE PM&E has selected the preferred alternative for 6 th Avenue comprised of two 10-foot travel lanes with 3.5-foot shoulders in each direction with a separated 8-foot multi-use pathway on the south side and a 5-foot concrete sidewalk on the north side. For Oklahoma Street, the preferred alternative is comprised of two 10-foot travel lanes with 3.5-foot shoulders in each direction with an attached 8-foot multi-use pathway on the west side and a 5-foot concrete sidewalk on the east side. ISSUES DIRECTLY AFFECTING CREEKSIDE PARK 6 th Avenue has approximately 600 linear feet of frontage along the north boundary of Creekside Park. In response to public comments about parking, the project design calls for the construction of approximately 20 parallel parking stalls located in the right-of-way adjacent to the park. The Design Study Report (DSR) included two parking alternatives and an alternative without parking. PM&E has selected the parking alternative preferred by Parks and Recreation Department staff. The proposed parking will not block an existing service gate into the park. An 8-foot wide multi-use pathway is located on the south side of 6 th Avenue adjacent to the park. It joins to existing multi-use pathways that travel south inside the Patterson Street right-of-way and west to stairs connecting to adjacent neighborhoods. Bollards will be installed to prevent vehicles from entering the pathways. Pedestrian scale lighting is proposed along the multi-use pathway. The intersection of 6 th Avenue and Oklahoma Street was identified as an important pedestrian connection to the park and will be improved with new crosswalks at Oklahoma Street. Also at this intersection, a gateway feature is planned at the northeast corner of the park. The gateway creates an entry to an existing path traveling south between the elementary school ballfield and the park

ballfield. The gateway has a baseball motif designed into its architecture and will be surrounded by tree and shrub plantings. The discussion below describes the need for a turnaround at the west end of 6 th Avenue and the options that were considered. One option (Alternative 1) would impact Creekside Park. If Alternative 1 were to be included in the design, minimizing impact to exisitng vegetation on the northwest corner of the park would be a goal of the project. Where existing vegetation was impacted, the project scope will include replacing lost trees with new ones of the same species at a 1:1 ratio if requested by the Parks and Recreation Department or the Parks and Recreation Commission. ISSUES RELATED TO THE PROPOSED TURNAROUND At the far west end of 6 th Avenue, a turnaround is needed for emergency vehicles, maintenance equipment, those park users that would use the proposed parallel parking to access the park, mail delivery, trash collection, etc. Although a cul-de-sac is the typical provision to serve these needs, there is presently not sufficient right-of-way to construct a cul-de-sac. The design team explored eight alternatives for the termination at the west end of 6 th Avenue, including a T-shaped (hammerhead) turnaround and several potential layouts of a cul-de-sac. The hammerhead design was presented because it can be constructed within available right-ofway. However, neither the design team, PM&E, MOA Street Maintenance, nor the public favor the hammerhead design. Negative feedback was received such as the following public comment: You shouldn t put a hammerhead turnaround at the dead end of East 6 th. This will create a perfect place for drinking, partying, making-out, passing drugs, etc. There was a problem with this in the past when the parking area for the park (near the end of the street) was larger. There was a lot of late-night partying there and the community requested the parking area be downsized, which it was. This solved the problem. MOA Street Maintenance raised concerns about inefficient and potentially dangerous snow removal. The presence of a walkway serving Creekside Park Elementary School and the number of small children passing through the area is the key reason why the design team agrees with Street Maintenance that it would be best to eliminate or reduce all backing maneuvers in this location. The Parks and Recreation Department was consulted about the hammerhead versus the cul-desac. They indicated their chief concern is for the safety of pedestrians and park users. Of the seven cul-de-sac design alternatives considered, four were deemed to be sufficiently promising to advance. The pros and cons of these alternatives are noted below: 6 th Avenue/Oklahoma Street Reconstruction Project Parks and Recreation Commission Project Update Page 2 of 5

ALTERNATIVE PROS CONS 1 Cul-de-sac contained on public land; Provides 8-foot pathway around cul-de-sac; Clear line of sight for the cul-de-sac; Eliminates need for motorists or equipment to make backing maneuvers; and Improves driveway for property on NW end of street Requires a transfer of public land from park use to street right-of-way; Requires that a small number of native trees, shrubs and groundcover plants would be removed from the NW corner of the park; Requires removal of power pole with overhead electric, telephone, and cable that is costly; and Property owner may not want changes to 2a Minimizes right-of-way requirements from two private properties; Eliminates pathway around cul-de-sac, reduces rightof-way impacts; Eliminates the need to relocate power pole; Eliminates need for motorists or equipment to make backing maneuvers; and Improves driveway for property on NW end of street 4a Further minimizes right-of-way requirements to two private properties; Provides pathway connection on the south side of the cul-de-sac; Eliminates need for motorists or equipment to make backing maneuvers; and Improves driveway for property on NW end of street. 7 Further minimizes right-of-way requirements to two private properties; Provides pathway connection on the south side of the cul-de-sac; Reduces impact to private properties by routing the 8-foot pathway on the south side only; Avoids the power pole; Connects pathways; Eliminates need for motorists or equipment to perform backing maneuvers; and Improves driveway access to the property on NW end of 6 th Avenue driveway. Requires ROW from two private properties; No pathway around cul-de-sac; Pedestrians required to cross cul-de-sac to access trail/stairway; and Property owner may not want changes to driveway. Requires right-of-way from two private properties; and Property owner may not want changes to driveway. Requires right-of-way from two private properties; Requires pedestrians on the north side of 6 th Avenue to cross the street to navigate around cul-de-sac to the trail connections; and Property owner may not want changes to driveway. Alternative 7 was the design team s preferred cul-de-sac design. It would not impact Creekside Park; rather it requires private property acquisitions to construct. On April 9, 2008, design team members Joel Stout (Lounsbury & Associates) and Anne Brooks (Public Involvement Coordinator) met with the two potentially affected property owners to gauge their willingness to sell the right-of-way needed to build Alternative 7. After consideration, on May 7 th, the property owners indicated they are not willing to sell property for the cul-de-sac. Since Alternative 7 represents the smallest impact to the private property owners to construct a cul-de-sac without affecting Creekside Park it is very doubtful that further efforts to acquire private property will be successful. 6 th Avenue/Oklahoma Street Reconstruction Project Parks and Recreation Commission Project Update Page 3 of 5

Without willing sellers, the only other feasible option for constructing a cul-de-sac rather than a hammerhead turnaround is to transfer a small portion (approximately 1,600 sf) of parkland to street right-of-way. Parks and Recreation Department staff outlined the process required to transfer public parkland to another public use (municipal purpose). Because a cul-de-sac would be far superior to a hammerhead turnaround, and because private property owners are not willing to sell the needed right-of-way, PM&E will be seeking Parks and Recreation Department staff approval followed by approval of the Parks and Recreation Commission, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and the Municipal Assembly to transfer a small portion of Creekside Park to rightof-way. So, on May 14, 2008, the project team took this information to the Northeast Community Council to inform the council about the proposal and to seek their input. NECC considered two motions related to the cul-de-sac. A motion to not allow the parkland transfer was defeated 11 to 3. The second motion supported PM&E s request to transfer parkland to right-of-way with a caveat. The NECC motion in support of the transfer was recorded as: "Use of approximately 1,600 sq/ft of parkland for the cul-de-sac and the vacation of the north Patterson Street right-of-way. We strongly urge the Parks Commission to dedicate the right-of-way as a pedestrian walkway between Debarr and 6th Avenue, minus what is needed for Wal-Mart's driveway." The motion carried with 10/for, 3/against, and 4/abstain. PUBLIC OUTREACH TO DATE DATE May 2006 August 2006 November 2006 December 2006 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 April 2008 May 2008 OUTREACH Meeting with Creekside Elementary School principal Meeting municipal and state agencies Public meeting at Creekside Elementary School Presentation to Creekside Elementary School Parent Teachers Association Information presented and available at Creekside Elementary School back-to-school barbecue Presentation to Northeast Community Council, announcement of upcoming public meeting Public meeting (draft Design Study Report phase) Presentation to Northeast Community Council Information presented and available at Creekside Elementary School back-to-school barbecue Information presented at Creekside Elementary School Open House Presentation to Northeast Community Council prior to project team appearance at Planning and Zoning Commission, council voted to support project. Meeting with affected property owners on north side of proposed cul-de-sac Information presented to Northeast Community Council regarding turnaround options. Received council support for cul-de-sac affecting park land with caveat related to Patterson Street right-ofway. SCHEDULE Design is to be completed by December 2008; Construction is scheduled for 2009 pending Roads and Drainage bond passage. 6 th Avenue/Oklahoma Street Reconstruction Project Parks and Recreation Commission Project Update Page 4 of 5

BUDGET This bond-funded project is currently expected to cost approximately $4,700,000 including $400,000 for landscaping improvements along 6 th Avenue, Oklahoma Street and for Creekside Park. DECISION DESIRED The project team asks for approval from the Parks and Recreation Commission to transfer park land to right-of-way for the construction of a cul-de-sac as part of the 6 th Avenue Reconstruction project. The project team also asks the Parks and Recreation Commission to consider the Northeast Community Council s desires related to the Patterson Street right-of-way on any issue that may come before the Commission. PROJECT TEAM: Prime Consultant: Lounsbury & Associates, Inc. Joel Stout, PE, Project Manager, (907) 272-5451 PM&E Project Manager: Ron Rozak, P.E. Project Administrator: Chris Wood, P.E. Rise Alaska, LLC, (907) 276-8095 Public Involvement: Brooks & Associates Anne Brooks, PE, Public Involvement Coordinator Brooks & Associates, 272-5452 WEB SITE: www.6thavenueatcreekside.info Attachments: Cul-de-sac option drawings 1, 2a, 4a and 7 Aerial photo with design overlay, cul-de-sac and hammerhead options Landscaping plan showing full 6 th Avenue proposed improvements 6 th Avenue/Oklahoma Street Reconstruction Project Parks and Recreation Commission Project Update Page 5 of 5