To: Related to Item 2 of the Fourth Report of Heritage Oshawa (DS ) Memorandum. Re: Date: August 25, File: B

Similar documents
DS Development Services Committee Meeting- October 21, 2013

Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Roncesvalles Avenue

TOWN OF AURORA ARCHITECTURAL SALVAGE PROGRAM GUIDE

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING ON MONDAY AUGUST 28, 2017 JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act 844 Don Mills Road and 1150 Eglinton Avenue East

Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement Queen's Park

Meeting Agenda. Business Items

Youth Category Award

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE ON TUESDAY MARCH 29, 2016

Heritage Property 70 Liberty Street (Central Prison Chapel)

The Manager of Urban Design and Cultural Heritage recommends:

SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

Town of Newmarket 395 Mulock Drive P.O. Box 328, Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 4X7. Website: newmarket.ca Phone:

Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment

At its meeting of August 7-9, 2012, the Standards Council considered the above referenced matter.

Paul D. Ralph, BES, RPP, MCIP, Commissioner, Development Services Department. Proposed Storm Water Pond Maintenance Fee

RE: Report CDS (Municipal Heritage Committee Minutes May 8, 2018) Randwood Estate

Urban Design Review Panel Terms of Reference

Municipal Heritage Awards Program

The Director of Development Planning and Manager of Urban Design and Cultural Heritage recommends:

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15, 2016

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF CENTRAL SAANICH. CENOTAPH COMMITTEE - 4:00 PM Wednesday, October 12, 2016 Council Chambers AGENDA

SUBJECT: Report recommending 563 North Shore Boulevard East remain on the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

Long Branch Neighbourhood Character Guidelines Final Report

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

PDS June 1, 2016 Page 1. Planning and Development Committee. MEETING DATE: Wednesday, June 01, 2016

Town of Cobourg Heritage Master Plan. Statutory Public Meeting

PRESENTED: April 15, 2008 FILE: DP No. 273/ Development Permit No Government Road Townhomes

E'-l. As a further tribute to the Teramoto family, a proposal for a sculpture to be

Planning and Building Department APPLICATION FOR CEMETERY EXPANSION BAYVIEW CEMETERY, 720, 726 AND 740 SPRING GARDENS ROAD

20 & 30 Frank Nighbor Place

Adversely impact the cultural heritage value of properties designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA).

TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS GUIDE

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Executive Director (Operational Services) Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities)

BOARD OF ADVISORS Biographies

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

L 4-1. Heritage Report: Reasons for Heritage Designation. Kodors House. 35 Rosedale Avenue West

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 27, 2014

UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION

The Pimachiowin Aki Management Plan: A case-study of collaborative planning in Canada s boreal forest.

DESIGN REVIEW PANEL PROCEDURES AND PROTOCOL

Historic Yonge Street HCD Plan Community Consultation October 14, 2015

2: Bond Street, I.O.F Orphanage

St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Focused Area - Official Plan Amendment Status Report

CITY OF VAUGHAN REPORT NO. 5 OF THE HERITAGE VAUGHAN COMMITTEE

; Office of the Regional Clerk

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

Location: The Wildlife Trust for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Northamptonshire, Lings House, Billing Lings, Northampton NN3 8BE

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT TERMS OF REFERENCE

Parks Master Plan Implementation: Phase I Waterfront Use and Design REPORT #: September 7, 2016 File #

5 Eireann Quay Site Plan Control Application

Ebbsfleet Development Corporation

City of Kingston Heritage Commemoration Program Guidelines: 7 May 2010

3. Endorse the LRT vision in transforming Surrey into Connected-Complete-Livable communities, and more specifically, the official vision statement:

WHEREAS, a number of these buildings are potentially historic structures;

~!VAUGHAN NOV Z November 21, Mr. Denis Kelly, Regional Clerk The Regional Municipality of York Yonge Street Newmarket, ON L3Y 6Z1

North York Community Council. Director, Community Planning, North York District. Ward No. 26, Don Valley West

112 College Street Zoning Amendment Application Preliminary Report

.+-M,.-,.+*,,A,--< ;:--t fi. ;,==: r ) i Q ; ',,(.:,*> 8 I-="' e$ ,; \!!&,,u

Planning and Growth Management Committee. Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division. Pg12013 (File No NNY 34 OZ)

This property contributes to the historic streetscape of Colborne Street and its striking architecture makes it a landmark along the street.

Fire Performance of external thermal insulation for walls of multistorey buildings

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Randle Siddeley associates landscape architecture environment urban design

A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR L ARCHE TORONTO

Vietnam Scaling up Urban Upgrading Project (SUUP)

a) That prior to the execution of the amending site plan agreement:

Planning Commission Report

ADOPTION OF THE REVISED OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN

Item No Halifax Regional Council March 8, 2011

STIKEMAN ELLIOTT. Stikeman Elliott LLP Barristers & Solicitors

2154 Dundas Street West Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act

Mayor Leon Skip Beeler and Members of the City Commission. Anthony Caravella, AICP, Director of Development Services

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WINDSOR Office of the City Solicitor Planning Department

Committee of the Whole Report

South of Eastern Strategic Direction Status Update

CANADIAN GUIDE FOR GREENER ROADS AND SUSTAINABILITY CONSIDERATIONS FOR BRIDGES GUIDE 2016 CANADIAN CONSULTING ENGINEERING AWARDS

APPLICATION BRIEFING Prepared For: Submitted by: Date: Subject:

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE34.30, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on August 25, 26, 27 and 28, 2014 CITY OF TORONTO

Council, at its meeting of November 8, 2004, adopted the following: That this matter be referred to the Council meeting of November 22, 2004.

Sewanee Village + Request for Builder/Developer Proposals

Downtown Streetscape Manual & Built Form Standards

Standards and Guidelines for Conservation of Historic Places in Canada

Heritage Oshawa Meeting

Cookstown Heritage Conservation District Plan Heritage Workshop Public Open House September 10, 2013

INCORPORATING COMPLETE STREETS INTO TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLANS. Brett Sears, M.Pl., MCIP, RPP

October 26, Re: Draft Environmental Impact Report for Paramount Pictures Master Plan, ENV EIR. Dear Mr. Villani,

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 16, 2016

June 7, Mr. Brian. 150 North. Third Streett. Foote. On behalf. Master Plan Project. Disney Studios. I. Final EXHIBIT Q-1

The purpose of this report is to respond to the following Community Services Committee Direction of May 4, 2010:

NHS Tayside. Fire Safety Policy

PART 1. Background to the Study. Avenue Study. The Danforth

M E M O R A N D U M February 21, 2018

and Richmond Street West - Official Plan Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Variance from Chapter 297, Signs, of the Former City of Toronto Municipal Code Bloor Street West (High Park)

RECEIVE AN UPDATE ON THE ALMOND GROVE PHASE II PROJECT

ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD

INTACH AWARD FOR BEST PRACTICES IN CONSERVATION

Transcription:

µ--2.~.~~~.~ Related to Item 2 of the Fourth Report of Heritage Oshawa (DS-16-161) Memorandum Development Services Department Date: August 25, 2016 To: Heritage Oshawa File: B-8600-0201-2013 From: Re: Margaret Kish, Senior Planner Development Services Department Restoration of the R. S. McLaughlin Estate Parkwood National Historic Site Greenhouses 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 270-290 Simcoe Street North R. S. Mclaughlin Estate Parkwood National Historic Site The Parkwood Foundation has applied to the City (see Attachment 1) to undertake conservation work on Greenhouses 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6. The proposed conservation work includes the preservation of Greenhouses 1, 2, 4 and 5 and the restoration of Greenhouse 6 (the Palm House) to restore the structures to their original appearance circa 1972, of which the conservation work will include: replacing the glazing as necessary to match the original configuration and material, including the curved eave glass on Greenhouse 6 (the Palm House) only, replacing degraded wood and metal elements to match the originals in size and profile, and the stabilization of masonry elements by repair or replacements in kind as necessary. In accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Council, after consultation with its municipal heritage committee, shall (i) consent to the application, (ii) consent to the application on terms and conditions, or (iii) refuse the application. and shall give notice of its decision to the owner of the property and the Ontario Heritage Trust. Heritage Oshawa is requested to provide Development Services Committee and Council a recommendation on the proposed restoration of Greenhouses 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 of R. S. Mclaughlin Estate Parkwood National Historic Site. Background: Parkwood Estate is designated pursuant to Section 29 of Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act by By-law 5-2000. As such, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act governs alterations to the property ifthe alteration is likely to affect the property's heritage attributes. By-law 5-2000 names the greenhouses as heritage attributes. In accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Council, after consultation with its municipal heritage committee, shall (i) consent to the application, (ii) consent to the application on terms and conditions, or (iii) refuse the application, and shall give notice of its decision to the owner of the property and the Ontario Heritage Trust.

- 2 - Parkwood Restoration Proposal In its letter to Council dated August 24, 2016 (see Attachment 1). The Parkwood Foundation describes the historic greenhouse complex as having played an enormous supporting role to the site's nationally-significant landscape and to the lifestyle and garden pursuits of Canadian autobaron R. S. McLaughlin. In addition, the greenhouse complex. in general, has been a conservation priority of The Parkwood Foundation for many years. The Parkwood Foundation is about to embark on the completion of the greenhouse conservation project at the estate. This second phase of work on the greenhouses, is based on the knowledge gained during the greenhouse work on the Vinery of 2013-2014. The Parkwood Foundation has applied to the City (see Attachment 1) to undertake conservation work on Greenhouses 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6. The proposed conservation work includes the preservation of Greenhouses 1, 2, 4 and 5 and the restoration of Greenhouse 6 (the Palm House). Parks Canada, Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada include the following definitions of conservation, preservation and restoration: Conservation: all actions and processes that are aimed at safeguarding the character-defining elements of an historic place so as to retain its heritage value and extend its physical life. This may involve Preservation, Rehabilitation, Restoration, or a combination of these actions or processes. Preservation: the action of process of protecting. maintaining. and/or stabilizing the existing materials, form, and integrity of an historic place, or of an individual component, while protecting its heritage value. Restoration: the action or process of accurately revealing, recovering or representing the state of an historic place. or of an individual component, as it appeared at a particular period in its history, while protecting its heritage value. The application under the Ontario Heritage Act for the restoration of Greenhouse 3 (the Vinery), the Greenhouse Pilot Project, was considered and approved by Council on November 4, 2013 and was carried out between November 2013 and October 2014. Whereas the Vinery was 95% original, the remaining five greenhouses have had much more intervention and alteration over the years, each with unique needs. Parkwood Foundation has worked with ERA Architects Inc. on the specifics for each greenhouse, based on both the historical and contemporary purpose of each, readying each greenhouse for use and historic interpretation.

- 3 The conservation program will return the five greenhouses to their original appearance circa 1972 (The Japanese Garden Greenhouse was changed by Sam McLaughlin in the 1960s when he hired architect George Tanaka to revise this space) and will include: Replacing glazing as necessary to match the original configuration and material, including the curved eave glass on Greenhouse 6 (The Palm House) only. For Greenhouses 1, 2, 4 and 5 curved clear acrylic panels will be used in lieu of the curved eave glass; Replacing degraded wood and metal elements to match the originals in size and profile; and Stabilizing masonry elements by repair or replacements in kind as necessary. Recommendation: That Heritage Oshawa recommend to the Development Services Committee: Whereas the R. S. Mclaughlin Estate Parkwood National Historic Site (Parkwood) located at 270 to 290 Simcoe Street North in the City of Oshawa is designated pursuant to Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act as being of architectural and historical interest; and, Whereas the greenhouses are identified as heritage attributes pursuant to the heritage designation by-law, By-law 5-2000 passed on January 17, 2000; and, Whereas the greenhouse complex, in general, has been a conservation priority of The Parkwood Foundation for many years; and Whereas The Parkwood Foundation has applied to the City (see Attachment 1) to undertake conservation work on Greenhouses 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6. The proposed conservation work includes the preservation of Greenhouses 1, 2, 4 and 5 and the restoration of Greenhouse 6 (the Palm House) to restore the structures to their original appearance circa 1972, of which the conservation work will include: replacing the glazing as necessary to match the original configuration and material, including the curved eave glass on Greenhouse 6 (the Palm House) only (for Greenhouses 1, 2, 4 and 5 curved clear acrylic panels will be used in lieu of the curved eave glass). replacing degraded wood and metal elements to match the originals in size and profile, and the stabilization of masonry elements by repair or replacements in kind as necessary; and Whereas Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act states that Council must consult with its municipal heritage committee, if one is established, prior to making a decision on the application; Therefore, City Council consent to the conservation work on Greenhouses 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 of R. S. Mclaughlin Estate Parkwood National Historic Site on the basis of the terms and conditions proposed by The Parkwood Foundation, namely, that it is The Parkwood Foundation's intention to undertake the preservation of Greenhouses 1, 2, 4 and 5 and the restoration of Greenhouse 6 (the Palm House) to restore the structures to their original appearance circa 1972, of which the conservation work will include: replacing the glazing as necessary to match the original configuration and material, including the curved eave glass on Greenhouse 6 (the Palm House) only (for Greenhouses 1, 2, 4 and 5 curved clear acrylic

- 4 panels will be used in lieu of the curved eave glass), replacing degraded wood and metal elements to match the originals in size and profile, and the stabilization of masonry elements by repair or replacements in kind as necessary. If you have any questions please contact me at 905-436-3311, extension 2945 or by email to mkish@oshawa.ca. ;;{!JJfrJ_, -fb( Margaret Kish, MCIP, RPP, Senior Planner Development Services Department MK/j Attachment

Attachment 1 August 24, 2016 Mayor John Henry and Members of Oshawa City Council The Corporation of the City of Oshawa 50 Centre Street South Oshawa, ON L1H 3Z7 Dear Mayor and Council: The Parkwood Foundation is about to embark on the completion of the greenhouse conservation project at the estate. This second phase of work on the greenhouses, is based on the knowledge gained during the greenhouse work on the Vinery Case Study of 2013-2014. As Parkwood is municipallydesignated under the Ontario Heritage Act, we are seeking Council s approval for the project. BACKGROUND The historic greenhouse complex (c. 1917) played an enormous supporting role to the site s nationallysignificant landscape and to the lifestyle and garden pursuits of Canadian autobaron R. S. McLaughlin. The greenhouses remaining today continue to support the propagation of specialty plant materials for the gardens and for greenhouse display, and they provide resources for study and interpretation, and for public education programs in history and horticulture. The greenhouse complex has been a conservation priority for many years, and Council may recall discussions about a formal conservation study we began in 2012 that preceded this pilot. PROJECT SCOPE The project involves five greenhouses, identified as 1, 2,4, 5, and 6 (please see attached aerial view). The 2013-2014 pilot project, the Vinery, identified as 3, helped increase our understanding about the original construction of these five greenhouses and through the study of these five greenhouses, the two grow houses; the Orchid House, Japanese Garden House, and Palm House, we are ready to undertake the conservation/restoration work. Where the Vinery was 95% original, the remaining five greenhouses had much more intervention and alteration over the years, each with unique needs in this proposed phase of the work. Parkwood has worked with ERA on the specifics that each greenhouse will need, based on the greenhouse purpose historically and contemporary, readying it for use and historic interpretation. The program will return the five greenhouses to their original appearance c. 1972 (The Japanese Garden Greenhouse was changed by Sam McLaughlin in the 1960s when he hired architect George Tanaka to revision this space) and will include:

Replacing glazing as necessary to match the original configuration and material, including the arched glass Replacing degraded wood and metal elements to match the originals in size and profile Stabilization of masonry elements by repair or replacements in kind as necessary CONSERVATION APPROACH The Statement of Reasons for designation does not describe the design elements of the greenhouses. Nonetheless, we remaining true to these elements (believed to be Lord & Burnham designs) guided by historical documentation including plans and photographs. There will be no change in the greenhouse footprint, nor any departure in dimension or mass from the existing greenhouse structure. Drawings and specifications for the work were completed by heritage specialists ERA Architects In., who are also engaged to provide expert supervision over the contractor (when selected). Parkwood has worked for many years with ERA, which firm has helped us carry out significant conservation projects, and interpret and apply Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada. When the tender process and bidding is complete, Parkwood will invite members of Heritage Oshawa to tour through the greenhouse complex and discuss many of the project details. We trust that they will concur with our approach and we look forward to sharing with them and with you our progress on the greenhouse project. Thanks for your consideration. Yours truly, R.A.(Bob) Baker Interim Executive Director 270 Simcoe Street N, Oshawa, Ontario L1G 4T5

Diagram of greenhouse complex configuration at Parkwood NHS: Aerial