City of Sugar Hill Planning Staff Report CBD Design Review

Similar documents
4/27/2017 Page 1 of3

City of Sugar Hill Planning Staff Report DRB TCO

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session

Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

PINE CURVE REZONING. BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002

Prosperity Hucks Area Plan. Transportation and Planning Committee May 11, 2015

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AREAS

TUSTIN RED HILL DEVELOPMENT TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

Status Report: MD 355 Project

ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE TO ADD A NEW SECTION 4.N. IN THE ZONING CODE FOR THE TOWN OF MIDDLETOWN, RELATING TO MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

Jason D. Sutphin, Community Development Division Chief. Through: Brooke Hardin, Director of Community Development and Planning

PINE CURVE REZONING. Property does not meet criteria for open space preservation and is not a candidate for a park

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this Ordinance is consistent with the City of Winter Garden Comprehensive Plan; and

appendix and street interface guidelines

WHEREAS, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing on January 14, 2010, the Prince George's County Planning Board finds:

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PINELLAS COUNTY MPO LIVABLE COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

D1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

Town Center. Block 5 Existing multifamily residential units are expected to remain.

ZONING. 300 Attachment 1. City of Oneonta. Design Guidelines ( )

4. Shape Transitions. 4. Shape Transitions

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Planner Kristine Gay

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

shown on the following page.

Communities Plan. Parkland-Spanaway-Midland. LUAC Review of Draft Policies

BOULEVARD AND PARKWAY STANDARDS

Incentive Zoning Regulations Florida Municipal City of Orlando

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

Tel: (705) Fax: (705)

Pentagon Centre (SP#297) Phase I Site Plan Amendments SPRC #3

Review of Opportunity Area C Draft Comprehensive Plan and Draft BOS Follow-On Motions. Special Working Group Meeting March 4, 2015

NWI Wetland Public Waters Inventory Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential. High Density Residential. Public or Institutional

LAND USE ELEMENT. Purpose. General Goals & Policies

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AUGUST 18, 2016

RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

The Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN

NARRATIVE STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION

AMENDMENT NO. 42 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWN OF GRIMSBY

NORTH LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA

NEC of Central Avenue and Indian School Road

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Recommendation Approval

Request Change in Nonconformity. Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jonathan Sanders

Town of Avon Village Center. A New Village Center for Avon October, 2015

Narcoossee Roadway Corridor

McDonald s Restaurant - Purcellville Town of Purcellville Special Use Permit Statement of Justification July 24, 2014

DENVER DESIGN DISTRICT GDP

DOWNTOWN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITES

PLANNING STAFF REVIEW

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

Citizen Advisory Group Meeting 5: Land Use April 14, 2011

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

OFFICE CONSOLIDATION SECONDARY PLAN AREA 22 THE BRAMALEA SOUTH INDUSTRIAL SECONDARY PLAN

MEMORANDUM. DATE: March 15, Chairman and Members Community Redevelopment Agency. Leif J. Ahnell, C.P.A., C.G.F.O. Executive Director

The Five Components of the McLoughlin Area Plan

STAFF REPORT TO COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Chapter PEDESTRIAN COMMERCIAL (PC) ZONING DISTRICT

3.1 community vision. 3.3 required plan elements

Metro. Activity Center Design Guidelines. Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers

Allen Street Civic District Redevelopment Area Plan Redevelopment Plan & Proposal State College Planning Commission State College Redevelopment

MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.

1. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Goals, Objectives, and Policies

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS MEDICAL DISTRICT

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

4.9 Land Use and Planning

599 Kennedy Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

HISTORIC TOWN CENTER MASTER PLAN CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION APRIL 3, 2012

Vision Statement for the Town of Flower Mound Master Plan The Town of Flower Mound Master Plan furthers the established community based vision to:

Tyvola & Archdale Transit Station Area Plan. May 15, 2008

KEIZER STATION PLAN INTRODUCTION

3.5 Historic Old Town Character Area

Standards (R-3) Figure B-11: R-3 Residential Standards Exhibit

Northwest Rail Corridor and US 36 BRT Development Oriented Transit Analysis 4.4 STATION AREA FINDINGS

A. Background Summary of Existing Challenges and Potential Possibilities. 1. Summary of Existing Assets and Potential Opportunities

Request Conditional Rezoning (R-15 Residential to Conditional A-24 Apartment) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

Infill Residential Design Guidelines

THE CITY OF VAUGHAN BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER

Recommended changes to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

Lower Merion Commercial Districts Issues and Characteristics Handbook November 2013

Planned Residential Neighborhoods Land Use Goals

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Seneca Meadows. Block 4 Locate office, technology, and medical development adjacent to I Screen views of garage structures from I-270.

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

North Downtown Specific Plan MEMORANDUM

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN ELEMENT

B. Blocks, Buildings and Street Networks

City of Woodinville Planning Commission Study Session. Development Regulations 101: An Overview of Specific Regulatory Items To Help You in 2012

Planning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008

WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Hockessin Community Redevelopment Plan

Transcription:

City of Sugar Hill Planning Staff Report CBD Design Review 18-00615-2 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: November 27, 2018 Mayor and Council, Design Review Board Planning Director Central Business District (CBD) Design Review Mixed Use Development, Prestwick Development Company RECOMMENDED ACTION Approval of the site plan and buildings in material and architectural detail with the following conditions: 1. These conditions shall :replace and supersede all previously approved conditions associated with design review approval on June 11, 2018. 2. Final designs shall substantially resemble the attached exhibits labeled Exhibit 1 and 2. Final material and color selections shall be subject to on-site mock-up approval. 3. Streetscape amenities such as but not limited to street trees and pedestrian lights shall be integrated into the Hillcrest Drive frontage. The building setback on Hillcrest shall incorporate not more than two bays of off-street parking as shown on the attached site plan. 4. The plaza at the corner of Hillcrest Drive and Highway 20 shall incorporate a substantial gateway art feature. The final design shall incorporate a water feature and must be approved by the City Manager prior to releasing permits. REQUEST The City of Sugar Hill has received an application from Prestwick Development Company requesting design review board approval for a mixed-use project at the comer of Hillcrest Drive and Nelson Brogdon Boulevard, located within the Central Business District Overlay. DISCUSSION Previously approved design included seven townhome style multifamily buildings with attached private garages; two four/ five story multifamily buildings with elevator service; separate buildings for fitness, recreation and clubhouse facilities as well as an outparcel for future retail development. Revised version is based on more complete site engineering data and incorporates the separate retail parcel into a vertical mixed-use building to be developed concurrently with the rest of the project instead of as a placeholder for future development. 11/27/2018

~ Original plan well-conceived. New proposal more congruent with adopted vision for downtown: o Consolidates layout of buildings and parking areas. o Draws buildings closer to Highway 20 and away from the adjacent homes. o Improves urban feel at the edges along Hwy 20 and Hillcrest Drive. Plan does not address future inter-parcel access to the west; however, easements for future accommodations may be used to satisfy this overlay requirement. this can be resolved through the development and engineering review phase of the project. BACKGROUND APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER: EXISTING ZONING: REQUEST: Prestwick Development Company Ansley Hillcrest LLC General Business / Central Business District Overlay (BG/CBD) Design review approval, mixed use development PROPERTY SIZE: ± 11.73 Acres, Tax Parcel #7-305-062 LOCATION: Northwest corner of Hillcrest Drive and Nelson Brogdon Boulevard DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Is the proposed project consistent with the adopted design guidelines for the type of development, and/ or the proposed use? The CBD requirements are designed to foster development of the city center using traditional block patterns characterized by common side walls, building fronts abutting the sidewalk and onstreet parking; breaking up large blocks; optimizing multi-modal connectivity and incorporating small public gathering spaces. The proposed design is consistent with the adopted design guidelines. The buildings provide pedestrian-scale architectural elements and commercial uses at the ground floor. The site includes pedestrian oriented streetscape elements and integrates space for public gathering as well. 2. Is the proposed project consistent and compatible with the nature and character of the surrounding areas? The proposed designs are consistent with the adopted vision and emerging character of Downtown Sugar Hill. 11/27/2018 2 3

3. Are the site design, landscaping, general design, character, arrangement and scale of buildings, texture, materials and colors of the project similar to or compatible with features or structures in the area. The proposed elevations and conceptual site plans are compatible in scale, material selection, and general design character with the nearby church as well as planned improvements across Highway 20. 4. Will the interior arrangement or use have a'!y iffect on exterior architectural features and othenvise complies with the standards of this ordinance? The design team will need to ensure that any interior changes to the configuration do not adversely affect the layout of the facade. 5. Does the project contribute or resemble the following criteria for considering a design inappropriate? Character foreign to the area I Arresting and spectacular iffects I Violent contrasts of maten'al or color, or intense or lurid colors I A multiplicity or incongruity of details resulting in a restless and disturbing appearance I The absence of unity and coherence in composition not in consonance with the density and character of the present structure or surrounding area. The proposed changes do not contribute to any of the listed inappropriate design criteria. 11/27/2018