Physical & Cultural Control of Pear Psylla

Similar documents
Cover crops: Inviting Natural Enemies into Your Orchard

(35) PROHEXADIONE CALCIUM (APOGEE ) REDUCES GROWTH OF CONTAINER GROWN CITRUS ROOTSTOCK SEEDLINGS

FIRE BLIGHT INFECTIONS OF SHOOTS (SHOOT BLIGHT) FOR SUSCEPTIBLE APPLE VARIETIES

OSU Home Fruit Tree Pest Management Guide for the Hood River Area APPLE

Pear Year-Round IPM Program Annual Checklist

Hops Production. Dr. Heather Darby UVM Extension Agronomist

Healthy Garden Tips Web site: Telephone: University of California Cooperative Extension Napa County

Mexican Rice Borer: Biology of an Invasive Species Julien Beuzelin

Effects of Gibberellin Synthesis Inhibition on Feeding Injury by Potato Leafhopper on Apple

Steven R. James and Gary L. Reed

Developing integrated control tactics for cole crop pests. Final report, 13 February 2008

Mating disruption: A selective tool for fruit pest management. Larry Gut

Effect of Five Planting Dates on Yield of Six Sweet Onions

Detecting and Managing. Little Cherry Disease Organic Pest and Disease Management Fruit School March 15, 2017

Farmers will increase yield and profit by taking care of the hot pepper from planting the seed to harvesting the fruit.

Importance of Timing for Codling Moth and Obliquebanded Leafroller Management

Nutrient Management for Tree Fruit. Mary Concklin Visiting Extension Educator Fruit Production and IPM University of Connecticut

How to fill in the Priorities Survey

PGRs in Tree Manipulation. Duane W. Greene University of Massachusetts

Home Fruit Gardening 101

Vegetable Report 1 from Experiment Station, HARC December 1998

Common Hop Pests & Diseases and Their Control. Rosalie Madden, MSc, P.Ag., CCA Horticulture Crops Specialist

Organic Apple Pest Management. Matthew J. Grieshop PhD Michigan State University

Peach IPM Elements Revised March, 2012

FINAL REPORT. Branch induction in pear trees with bioregulators

Redbanded Stink Bug Research

Integration of Tree Spacing, Pruning and Rootstock Selection for Efficient Almond Production

Fruit Pest News. Volume 9, No. 4 April 9, In This Issue:

Performance of Berries in Field and High Tunnel Production System

GETTING THE UPPER HAND ON FIRE BLIGHT

FIRST YEAR RECOVERY FOLLOWING A SIMULATED DROUGHT IN WALNUT. D. A. Goldhamer, R. Beede, S. Sibbett, D. Ramos, D. Katayama, S. Fusi, and R.

Issues in Orchard Establishment. Site Selection Orchard Design Site Preparation Scion/Rootstock Selection Orchard Economics

Home Orchard Care for Master Gardeners. Jeff Schalau Associate Agent, ANR University of Arizona Cooperative Extension, Yavapai County

Tree Fruit IPM Advisory

Tree Fruit IPM Advisory

Growing Tips: Pests and diseases

Potassium Applications and Yellow Shoulder Disorder of Tomatoes in High Tunnels

California Pepper Commission ANNUAL Report for Title: The Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization on Yield and Quality of Bell Peppers

Epicormic shoots and growth plasticity of fruit trees in response to horticultural manipulations

Integration of Tree Spacing, Rootstock Selection & Pruning for Efficient Almond Production

Light Management in Pecan Orchard in Semi-Arid Regions. Jim Walworth, University of Arizona & Richard Heerema, New Mexico State University

Welcome to the Iowa Certified Nursery Professional Training program Module 9: Managing Plant Diseases and Insects.

pcfruit PROEFCENTRUM FRUITTEELT VZW

Management strategies for fertigation of sweet cherry

Blueberry Field Day. July 12, 2010

CROP PROTECTANTS: Science K-5


Nitrogen release and disease suppressive activity of four compost amendments on three vegetable farms

My Field Set up. Matthew DeBacco

INSECT MANAGEMENT (Phillip Roberts, Mike Toews, and David Buntin)

Eggplant Production IDEA-NEW

Response of Tomato and Pepper to Monopotassium Phosphate-Based Starter Solutions George J. Hochmuth 1

Apple IPM 101 TERENCE BRADSHAW, PH.D UVM APPLE PROGRAM & VT TREE FRUIT GROWERS ASSOCIATION 120TH ANNUAL MEETING FEBRUARY 18, 2016

Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 4, No. 2, June 2009

Use Your New Control Options in Pest Control: Focus on Codling Moth and Leafrollers

Codling Moth Control at Hoch Orchard

Northeast SARE Grant Report: FNE00-293: Controlling Oriental Fruit Moth in Peaches Using Pheromone Disruption

Pesticide Use in Mating Disrupted Pear Orchards Broc Zoller The Pear Doctor, Inc., Kelseyville, CA

TURF. Recommendations for lawns and recreational areas not grazed by livestock.

Enhancing Biocontrol with perimeter plantings. Tom Unruh USDA-ARS, Wapato WA

TAMARIXIA RADIATA TO

APR C:CEIVED. Objectives: Results : Project No : 94-PBB. Project Leader: PATRICK H. BROWN

Critical Weed Control Requirements in High Density Apple Orchards

Prionus root borer: biology, behavior and management. Angelita L. Acebes-Doria Tree Nut Entomology University of Georgia - Tifton

Effect of Nitrogen and Potassium on Growth and Development of Curcuma alismatifolia Gagnep.

STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF IMIDACLOPRID ON DATE PALM HOPPER BY SOIL APPLICATION AND INJECTION

Cloud Mountain Farm 6906 Goodwin Rd., Everson, WA (360) voice, (360) fax,

COMPETITION AMONG VEGETATIVE AND REPRODUCTIVE CYCLES AND ROLE OF PRUNING. Musacchi, S.

Performance of Apple and Pear Cultivars in Northern Mississippi,

EVALUATION OF SMARTSTAX TRAITED AND REFUGE CORN HYBRIDS IN COMBINATION WITH SOIL INSECTICIDES AT PLANTING FOR LARVAL CORN

Tree water use and irrigation

Avocado Tree Pruning in Chile

Paul Vossen University of California Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor. Dealing with Drought

Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis) is a

satg WATERMELON CULTIVATION DISEASES PESTS

Common Insect Pests of Cucurbits

Integrated Pest Management. University of California Statewide IPM Program

Pest Control Experience in the South African Citrus Industry. Tim G Grout

Progress Report. Grant Code SRSFC Project # Research Proposal

New Planting. A&L Canada Laboratories Small Fruit News Letter Vol. 3 April 17, application should be at a 90 o direction to the row direction.

2013 NEW ENGLAND TREE FRUIT MANAGEMENT GUIDE

KSU Blackberry Trial Update. Jeremy Lowe and Kirk W. Pomper Kentucky State University

Determining the Host-Plant Resistance Mechanisms for Banded Sunflower Moth

Management Approaches for Thrips and Garden Symphylans in Lettuce 2

Training Young Walnut Trees

Cross-virulence of Nephotettix virescens (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) Biotypes Among Some Rice Cultivars with the Same Major-resistance Gene

Introduction. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences North Florida Research and Education Center Suwannee Valley


Unit D: Fruit and Vegetable Crop Production. Lesson 4: Growing and Maintaining Tree Fruits

POTATO VARIETY RESPONSE TO PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER

Optimizing Cherry Production: Physiology-Based Management. Gregory Lang Michigan State University

Suggestion of using Imidacloprid for controlling Erythrina gall wasp ( 刺桐姬小蜂 ) Infestation in Erythrina variegate ( 刺桐 )

High Tunnel Primocane Fruiting Blackberry Production in Cold Region of Midwest*

Nutrient Management for Perennial Fruit Crops

Walnut Hedgerow Trial on Marginal Soils. Bill Krueger, John Edstrom and Wilbur Reil

2.27Kg. Plant Growth Regulator

White Rot Fungicide Evaluations in Fresno County & Nitrogen Balance Progress Report

Alternate Irrigation of Avocados: Effects on Growth, Cropping, and Control of Rosellinia Necatrix

Frank A. Hale, Ph.D. Professor Entomology and Plant Pathology and David L. Cook Extension Agent II, Davidson County

Fruit Pest News. April 16, 2001

Transcription:

Physical & Cultural Control of Pear Psylla Psylla Summit 22-23 September, 2014 Fruit Commission, Yakima, WA Elizabeth H. Beers Tree Fruit Research & Extension Center 1100 N. Western Ave. Wenatchee, Washington

Is Pear Psylla an Induced Pest? Key Pest: one that will continue to cause economic damage in the absence of all pesticides Induced Pest: one that will cease to reach damaging levels once pesticides are withheld

10-year study of discontinued sprays 1 acre orchard, isolated, no insecticides or acaricides 1960-1969 ERM not a problem CM, PC, RBLR and AM rendered the crop worthless after the 1st year. LAW caused severe fruit injury during last 2 year (took 8 years to show up!!!) AM consistently most damaging pest, generally >75% damage Glass, E. H., and S. E. Lienk. 1971. Apple insect and mite populations developing after discontinuance of insecticides: 10-year record. J. Econ. Entomol. 64: 23-26.

Is Psylla an Induced Pest? Orchards that had received no chemical spray applications for a number of years showed only trace numbers of both the pear psylla and its predators. Apparently when biological control of the psylla is achieved, very few predators suffice to maintain it. #10002. Watson, T. K., and W. H. A. Wilde. 1963. Laboratory and field observations on two predators of the pear psylla in British Columbia. Can. Entomol. 95: 435-438. The trees at this orchard had received all cultural requirements except the application of pesticides. The orchard suffered heavily from pear psylla attack from 1959 through 1961. In 1962 predators (anthocorid bugs and lacewings) brought the pear psylla population to a low level. #10003. Madsen, H. F., and T. T. Y. Wong. 1964. Effects of predators on control of pear psylla. Calif. Agric. 18: 2-3.

Tree Washes Brunner & Burts 1981 5 unreplicated plots, 50 trees, 10x20ft, 0.23 acres cv. Bartlett Measured nymph density throughout season Measured honeydew 4x in July/Aug Measured fruit damage at harvest #9991. Brunner, J. F., and E. C. Burts. 1981. Potential of Tree Washes as a Management Tactic Against the Pear Psylla. J. Econ. Entomol. 74: 71-74.

Tree Washes Brunner & Burts 1981 (Wash volume 1,000 to 1,200 gpa, applied handgun dormant DD Washes Unwashed x x 13-Mar 4-Apr 10-Jun 17-Jun 25-Jun 2-Jul 9-Jul 15-Jul 21-Jul 28-Jul 2 washes + Triton x x x x 6 washes + Triton x x x x x x x 8 washes, water only x x x x x x x x x Unwashed x #9991. Brunner, J. F., and E. C. Burts. 1981. Potential of Tree Washes as a Management Tactic Against the Pear Psylla. J. Econ. Entomol. 74: 71-74.

12000 Nymphs 10000 Nymph-days (cum) 8000 6000 4000 2000 Mean honeydew (mg fructose/50 lvs) 4 samples 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 Unwashed Honeydew Unwashed 2 washes water+triton 2 washes water+triton 6 washes water+triton 6 washes water+triton 8 washes water only 8 washes water only Unwashed Unwashed Tree Washes Brunner & Burts 1981 #9991. Brunner, J. F., and E. C. Burts. 1981. Potential of Tree Washes as a Management Tactic Against the Pear Psylla. J. Econ. Entomol. 74: 71-74.

Overtree irrigation Westigard et al 1979 Measured codling moth, psylla, TSM, rust mite 3-year study, 1976-1978 Bartlett, d Anjou Overtree vs undertree, 3 replicated blocks 5-6 irrigations, biweekly, 75 mm (3 inches) in 24 h Standard CM spray program Results: CM no difference in OT vs UT PP significantly lower in OT in 2 of 3 years PRM significantly lower in OT in 1 year (only 1 measured) TSM no difference in the 2 years this was measured PP natural enemies no difference, 1 out of 1 year measured #10010. Westigard, P. H., P. B. Lombard, and R. B. Allen. 1979. Effects of Overtree Irrigation on Density and Damage of Pear Pests. J. Econ. Entomol. 72: 839-840.

Effect of Abiotic factors Ross 1918: High temps + low humidity cause decline in pear psylla populations Wilde 1965: Drenching rains (2 inches) dislodged instars 1-4; eggs remained attached. Wilde 1965: exposure of liquid honeydew in lab experiments to 114-117 F/30% RH did not solidify the honeydew. Madsen 1962: speculated that in coastal CA, temps above 32.2 C [90 F] restrict egg laying. #9991. Brunner, J. F., and E. C. Burts. 1981. Potential of Tree Washes as a Management Tactic Against the Pear Psylla. J. Econ. Entomol. 74: 71-74.

Effect of Temp/Vigor on Fecundity McMullen & Jong 1972 250 Fecundity Eggs/female 200 150 100 50 ab June August August ab b c d bc Summerland BC cv. Bartlett June = cool (18 C) August = hot (25 C) Field clip cages of females, lifetime fecundity Vigorous v non-vigorous orchards 0 Nonvigorous/18 C Vigorous/18 C Nonvigorous/25.1 C Vigorous/25.1 C Non-vig to vig/25.1 C Vig to non-vig/25.1 C #10004. McMullen, R. D., and C. Jong. 1972. Influence of temperature and host vigor on fecundity of the pear psylla (Homoptera: Psyllidae). Can. Entomol. 104: 1209-1212.

Effect of Nitrogen fertilization Pfeiffer & Burts 1983 Mature d Anjou orchard (Smith Tract 7?) 4 trts of N rates and timing, 2x2 factorial Treatments applied 4 years, data taken 1 year Rate of N per acre Timing 77 lb 108 lb Dormant 77 lb, 108 lb, dormant dormant Late Summer 77 lb, late summer 108 lb, late summer

Effect of Nitrogen fertilization Pfeiffer & Burts 1983 Higher N rates produced higher levels of psylla (egg, nymphs Timing had little effect (interaction NS) Early season populations most affected

Effect of N on psylla predators Daugherty et al 2007 Hypothesis: plant quality mediates the efficacy of an important natural enemy of pear psylla, Anthocoris nemoralis Potted, caged 1-yr-old Bartlett trees Fertilized with high or low rates of N (Hoaglands, 5 vs 20 mm N)* Added psylla alone, or psylla+predator Measured plant growth, psylla density, predators E. *the Beers low level 2014 was characterized as limiting to plant growth #10008. Daugherty, M. P., C. J. Briggs, and S. C. Welter. 2007. Bottom-up and top-down control of pear psylla (Cacopsylla pyricola): Fertilization, plant quality, and the efficacy of the predator Anthocoris nemoralis. Biol. Contr. 43: 257-264.

Effect of N on psylla predators Daugherty et al 2007, cont d More N=bigger trees with higher N content More N=more psylla Level of suppression by Anthocoris not related to N level, but was related to psylla density Prior to predator additions

Vigor suppression by PGRs Westigard et al 1980 % Downgraded Fruit from Psylla 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Fruit Damage 1977 1978 1979 Alar Check Daminozide (Alar) at 2000 ppm AI 18 yr old Bartlett 5 single-tree reps 3-year study, 1977-1979 Timed for 7-9 leaves of new shoot growth (30-50 DAFB) #892. Westigard, P. H., P. B. Lombard, R. B. Allen, and J. G. Strang. 1980. Pear Psylla pyricola: population suppression through host plant modification using daminozide. Environ. Entomol. 9: 275-277.

Vigor suppression by PGRs Paulson et al 2005 Psylla nymphs/leaf 20 15 10 5 Psylla Nymphs Apogee 3x Imidacloprid+Apogee Imidacloprid Check 0 12-May 19-May 26-May 02-Jun 09-Jun 16-Jun 23-Jun 30-Jun Prohexadione calcium (Apogee) 4 trts, Apogee with or without Imidacloprid + Control Bartlett 21 yr old 4 single-tree reps 1-year study, 1999 Measured nymph, adult density (May-June only); shoot growth #10007. Paulson, G. S., L. A. Hull, and D. J. Biddinger. 2005. Effect of a Plant Growth Regulator Prohexadione-Calcium on Insect Pests of Apple and Pear. J. Econ. Entomol. 98: 423-431.

Vigor suppression by PGRs Paulson et al 2005 Psylla nymphs/leaf 20 15 10 5 Psylla Nymphs Apogee 3x Imidacloprid+Apogee Imidacloprid Check 0 12-May 19-May 26-May 02-Jun 09-Jun 16-Jun 23-Jun 30-Jun Prohexadione calcium (Apogee) 4 trts, Apogee with or without Imidacloprid + Control Bartlett 21 yr old 4 single-tree reps 1-year study, 1999 Measured nymph, adult density (May-June only); shoot growth #10007. Paulson, G. S., L. A. Hull, and D. J. Biddinger. 2005. Effect of a Plant Growth Regulator Prohexadione-Calcium on Insect Pests of Apple and Pear. J. Econ. Entomol. 98: 423-431.

Fertization, PGRs Shaltiel-Harpaz et al 2010 Cacopsylla bidens (Sulc), Israel Manipulated N levels and PGRs (Clormequat chloride and Apogee) Three levels of N: 0, 50, 100 ppm N via drip irrigation Potted, field grown trees, treated 8 mo before start of exp. Higher oviposition and nymph development rates in trees with higher leaf N PGRs suppressed growth even in trees with high N level #10011. Shaltiel-Harpaz, L., R. Kedoshim, D. Openhiem, R. Stern, and M. Coll. 2010. Effect of host plant makeup through nitrogen fertilization and growth regulators on the pear psylla population. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 58: 149-156.

Effect of Cultivar PP nymph densities were higher on Anjou than on Bartlett or Flemish Wilde, 1962 #7245. Wilde, H. A. 1962. Bionomics of the pear psylla, Psylla pyricola Foerster in pear orchards of the Kootenay valley of British Colombia, 1960. Can. Entomol. 94: 845-849.

Effect of Ground Cover Management PP increased more rapidly in a clean cultivated plot than in a plot with cover crop. [Clean cultivated plots had higher temperature and lower humidity]. Cover cropped plots harbored more natural enemies Wilde, 1962 #7245. Wilde, H. A. 1962. Bionomics of the pear psylla, Psylla pyricola Foerster in pear orchards of the Kootenay valley of British Colombia, 1960. Can. Entomol. 94: 845-849.

Practices to reduce vigor Minimize N fertilization Pruning practices/type of cuts, timing Tree training Tree density/spacing Rootstocks/interstems/cultivar Root pruning Plant growth regulators

Bins/acre (bin=1,100 lb) 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 Yield - winter pears Economic Health Washington winter pears 26 24 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 360 340 320 $/bin - winter pears 300 280 $/bin 260 240 220 200 180 160 140 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014