FIRE PROTECTION AND SAFETY ANALYSIS FOR AN OFFICE HIGH RISE BUILDING. Fabio Mazza June 2016

Similar documents
Will Clay Spring 2014

Building & Fire Code Academy. Building Better With Our Greatest Resource Education. Welcome!

By: Russell Bainbridge March 18th, 2016 FPE 596

Culminating Project. Fire Protection and Life Safety Engineering Analysis. Cal Poly. Center for Science and Mathematics. Fire Protection Engineering

COSTCO, SAN FRANCISCO A PRESCRIPTIVE AND PERFORMANCE BASED ANALYSIS OF FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND DESIGN

BOABC Level III Exams 7, 8, 9 and 10 Beginning April 1, 2015

Case Study of Underground Car Park. Team Japan

Fire Hazard Analysis of Technical Area 53 Building 1

SPECIAL DETAILED REQUIREMENTS BASED ON USE AND OCCUPANCY

Fire Protection Analysis DCI Data Center Building

PROPOSED CODE CHANGES FOR REVIEW BY THE FIRE CODE ACTION COMMITTEE

Construction Warehouse. FPE 596 Culminating Experience In Fire Protection Engineering Final Project (Spring 2014) By Ben Johnson

CHAPTER 7 ALTERATIONS LEVEL

Prepared for: Professor Frederick W. Mowrer, PhD, P.E. Professor Christopher Pascual, PhD, P.E

Statue of Liberty: A Risk Analysis

January 1, 2014 Mandatory Effective Date

Fire Protection Coffee Break Training May 2016

CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC SLO

Fire Protection System and Life Safety Evaluation. Building X. Anthony W. Sublett. Culminating Project

Agency for Health Care Administration

Construction Innovation Center Building 186

ROBERT E. KENNEDY LIBRARY CAL POLY, SAN LUIS OBISPO FIRE PROTECTION ANALYSIS FPE CULMINATING PROJECT. Prepared For:

Recommended Amendments to the 2015 International Existing Building Code North Central Texas Council of Governments Region

Life Safety - Means of Egress/Exits NFPA 101

SPECIAL DETAILED REQUIREMENTS BASED ON USE AND OCCUPANCY

FIRE INSPECTORS GUIDELINES FOR PLAN REVIEWS AND INSPECTIONS OF NEW CONSTRUCTION / ADDITIONS AND CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY

Fire Protection Engineering Culminating Project. Analysis of the Seattle Customer Delivery Center. Prepared by Cynthia Wernet

Prescriptive and Performance Analysis of Cold Machine Shop FPE 596 Culminating Project

SPECIAL DETAILED REQUIREMENTS BASED ON USE AND OCCUPANCY

Date: February 22, 2005 Kimbalton DUSEL, Pre-S-2 Submittal CNA0402 PRELIMINARY CODE REVIEW. International Plumbing Code Edition

Richard B. Alpert, P.E. Senior FPE, Clark Nexsen

2018 IFC Update. Based on the 2018 International Fire Code, (IFC ) Goal. Objectives. Content

California Fire Code (CFC) Part III contains requirements. Building and Equipment Design Features PART. Chapters 5 through 19

Agency for Health Care Administration

For additional information regarding R-3.1 residential care facilities please contact (951)

IBC Committee Responsibility Matrix January 2017

FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY ANALYSIS

2015 Recommended Building Code with Amendments. The Executive Committee of the Central Iowa Code Consortium does ordain as follows:

COMPLIANCE ALTERNATIVES

Building Description Applicable Codes & Standards Prescriptive Requirements. Performance Based Design

MINOOKA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Fire Prevention Bureau Fire Inspector Rodney Bradberry

COMPLIANCE ALTERNATIVES

EQUIVALENT INITIAL FIRE SAFETY ASSESSMENT

SAFETY. USE OF SAFETY CHECK LISTS A safety check for compliance with current regulations should be performed yearly.

Fire Protection System and Life Safety Evaluation of Building X. Anthony W. Sublett

Life Safety Report. XYZ Office Building. Denver Colorado. Prepared by: Keith Dix Monday, June 3, 2013

Culminating Project U.S. Federal Courthouse FPE Spring 2013

2. The Group F occupancy has have an a combined occupant load of 500 or more above or below the lowest level of exit discharge.

PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHODS

Residential-based Care Facility R-4 Guideline

BUILDING CODE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK. New York City Department of Buildings 4 June 2007

PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHODS

2012 B.C. Building Code Compliance Review (Division B Part 3)

Agency for Health Care Administration

Item Referenced and Amendments Building 1 Building 2 Analysis, Review and Remarks. Page 1 of 15

2009 International Fire Code Errata. SECOND PRINTING (Posted April 6, 2010)

American Fire Sprinkler Association. An Introduction to the IBC and IFC

Virtual Compartment: An Alternative Approach to Means of Egress Design in Airport Pedestrian Tunnel

Riverside County Fire Department Office of the Fire Marshal Market St., Ste. 150, Riverside, CA Ph. (951) Fax (951)

Montgomery County Government Building and Codes Department 350 Pageant Lane, Suite 309 Clarksville, TN 37040

BCBC 2012 CHANGES TO PART 3

PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHODS

Fire Safety Evaluation of Existing Manufactured Educational Building Covered by Section 423 of the Florida Building Code

FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS

For the Florida Building Commission And the Fire Code Advisory Council

PROJECT: CIVIC ADDRESS:... PERMIT APPLICATION NO.: DATE:... CRP:. Certified Professional:.

Case Study 2 Production and Storage. SFPE Polish Chapter Wojciech Węgrzyński, Grzegorz Krajewski Building Research Institute (ITB)

INITIAL FIRE SAFETY ASSESSMENT

Fire Protection Engineering

Preview of the MA Building Code (780 CMR) 9 th edition

2000 to 2012 Hospital K-tag crosswalk matrix for hospitals 2000 Tag #

CODE SUMMARY REQUIREMENTS (NEW CONSTRUCTION/TENANT IMPROVEMENT (TI))

The Residences at Christina Landing Wilmington, DE

2012 International Building Code Errata (Portions of text and tables not shown are unaffected by the errata)

International Fire Code 2006 Requirements for Construction Plan Reviews of Commercial and Multi-Family Structures

FIRE SERVICE FEATURES

FIRE SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT

Date of Authorization May 26, 2005 BMEC Authorization BMEC Application # A

FIRE SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT

ERRATA TO THE 2000 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE. Fourth Printing, January 2002 Updated March 29, 2002

*HB0217* H.B. 217 H.B STATE FIRE CODE ACT AMENDMENTS. LEGISLATIVE GENERAL COUNSEL 6 Approved for Filing: C.R. Gilbert :11 PM 6

DEALING WITH FIRE SAFETY

Minimum Standards for Engineers Practicing Fire Protection Engineering in the State of Oklahoma September 14, 2016

FIRE SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT

NFPA Edition Update

Ch. 54 GROUP B EDUCATIONAL 34 CHAPTER 54. GROUP B EDUCATIONAL OCCUPANCY GROUP

Town of Cicero Local Code Amendments

INITIAL FIRE SAFETY ASSESSMENT

NFPA 101 Code Update from 2012 Edition to the 2015 Edition

INITIAL FIRE SAFETY ASSESSMENT

FIRE AND SAFETY PROJECT REVIEW REPORT

EQUIVALENT INITIAL FIRE SAFETY ASSESSMENT

Business License Pre-inspection Checklist

FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY ANALYSIS PRESCRIPTIVE AND PERFORMANCE BASED APPROACH

FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS

INITIAL FIRE SAFETY ASSESSMENT - EXPANSION

Nirmal Chandra Sinha. Supposed to complete(dd/ MM/YYYY) Comments after Physical Inspection

Preliminary Fire/Life Safety Assessment Task No (Submittal No. PH b14

How to Use Fire Risk Assessment Tools to Evaluate Performance Based Designs

Rental Housing Inspection Guide

Transcription:

FIRE PROTECTION AND SAFETY ANALYSIS FOR AN OFFICE HIGH RISE BUILDING Fabio Mazza June 2016

Introduction Codes & Standards Building description Performance based design Prescriptive based design Structural fire safety Fire detection and alarms Fire suppression Egress Smoke management

Codes & Standards LOCAL São Paulo State INTERNATIONAL Enactment 56.819/2011 NBR s (10.897:2014, 15.200:2012) IT s (07, 08, 09, 11, 14, 18, 20, 22) IBC (2012) NFPAs (13, 14, 72, 101)

Building Description Open office floors Theater Car parking garage

Building description Office floors (1st to 15th) Area/floor: 886m² N

Building description N Car parking garage (1st to 5th basement) Area/floor: 1,800m²

Building description Theater (1st + balcony + 2nd floor) Total area: 890m² N

Building description Theater

Structural fire safety Structural fire resistance: 120 min (IBC 2012 Type I-B) IBC 2012 - Paragraph 403.2.1.1, item 1: Supervised automatic sprinklers Building < 128m Type IA criteria for Type IB Collumns must not be reduced: 3-h Unlimited area/#floors GROUP B HEIGHT (feet) S A TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION TYPE I TYPE II TYPE III TYPE IV TYPE V A B A B A B HT A B UL 160 65 55 65 55 65 50 40 UL UL 11 UL 5 37,500 STORIES(S) AREA (A) 3 23,000 5 28,500 3 19,000 5 36,000 3 18,000 2 9,000 Local codes Building < 120m Group Division Underground Height (m) S2 S1 H>10 H<10 D D-1 to D-3 P1 H<6 P2 H>6 <12 P3 H>12 <23 Aboveground height (m) P4 H>23 <30 P5 H>30 <80 P6 H>80 <120 P7 H>120 <150 P8 H>150 <250 90 60 30 60 60 90 120 120 150 180

Structural fire safety Exterior walls (glass facades) Gap firestop (concrete/glass) Spandrel girder

Structural fire safety Prescriptive fire resistance (IBC 2012) Structural components dimensions / materials Cover thickness (to be verified no details) Fire resistance collumns: 3-hours Fire resistance beams and girders: 2-hours Fire resistance floors/roofs: 2-hours Fire resistance walls: Internal subdivisions: 2-hours Theater exterior walls: > 4-hours

Fire detection and alarms Smoke detection Office floors Theater Electrical rooms Smoke control / Stairways pressurization mechanical rooms Manufacturer: Johnson Controls Model: 2951J Photoelectric + thermal Sensitivity: 0.5%/ft to 5%/ft obscuration Temperature of activation: 57ºC Heat detection Car parking garages Manufacturer: Johnson Controls Model: 5951J Thermal Temperature of activation: 57ºC Supervised AS

Fire detection and alarms Alarm controller Security room Guard house No Emergency Voice/Alarm Communication System (EVAC) Notification appliances Visual/sound device Sound levels: compliant Illumination: not compliant (spacing + shadow areas) Manufacturer: Johnson Controls Model: IFC2-640E

Fire suppression AREA Offices system 1 (gravity) Required Occupancy classification Light hazard Type Wet Installed Sprinkler Heads Concealed Pendent K-5.6 SR 74ºC cover 74ºC spk Required Design Density Area (gpm/ft²) (ft²) Required Design Duration (min) 0.1@1500 30 Offices system 2 (gravity +pump) Garage (gravity) Theater (gravity) Light hazard Ordinary hazard Group 1 Ordinary hazard Group 2 Wet Wet Wet Concealed Pendent K-5.6 SR 74ºC cover 74ºC spk Upright K-5.6 SR 79ºC Main room: Pendent K-5.6 SR 79ºC 0.1@1500 30 0.15@1500 60 0.2@1500 60

Fire suppression Water supply Duration: 68 min Reliability Equipment certification Pump room installation standard Maintenance and testing standard

Fire suppression Water supply analysis sprinklers: Adequate Garage 1st basement Theater Offices 15th floor

Fire suppression Water supply analysis standpipes: Not adequate (12th to 15th floors) Standpipes 12th floor Standpipes 15th floor

Egress Offices IBC 2012: Business Group B Local codes: D-1 IBC and LSC: 82 people/floor Occupant load per IT-11/2014: 110 people/floor Exit capacity calculation (IBC x IT) 2 exits Scissor type stairs Distance 10m < 14m Common path of travel Accessibility Office exit door (0.8m) Stairway inlet doors (0.8m) Exit EAST LSC (2015) / IT-11 (2014) Stairway (1.2m) Stairway exit door (0.8m) EAST exit capacity 156 / 100 156 / 100 157 / 75 156 / 100 156 / 75 Exit WEST Stairway inlet Office exit door Stairway Stairway exit door EAST exit doors (0.8m) (1.2m) (0.8m) capacity (0.8m) 156 / 100 156 / 100 157 / 75 156 / 100 156 / 75 Total exit capacity per floor 312 / 150

Egress Car Parking garages IBC 2012: Low hazard storage Group S-2 Local codes: G-2 Occupant load per IBC and LSC: 97 people/floor Occupant load per IT-11/2014: 3 people/floor 2 exits Accessibility Exit 1 LSC (2015) / IT-11 (2014) Stairway inlet doors Stairway Stairway exit door Exit 1 capacity (0.8m) (1.2m) (0.8m) 156 / 100 157 / 60 156 / 100 156 / 60 Exit 2 Stairway inlet doors Stairway Stairway exit door Exit 2 capacity (0.8m) (1.2m) (0.8m) 156 / 100 157 / 60 156 / 100 156 / 60 Total exit capacity per floor 312 / 120

Egress Theater IBC 2012: Assembly Group A-1 Local codes: F-5 IBC = 234 people total Local code: 230 people 2 exits Distance 4.7m < 6.7m Dressing rooms Dead end Accessibility

Egress Theater Main exit door (1.65m) Open stairways (1.20m) First floor main exit route LSC (2015) / IT-11 (2014) Ground floor exit (1.65m) - - Exit capacity 323 / 300 157 / 150 323 / 300 - - 157 / 150 First floor secondary exit route Exterior Sec. exit door stairways - - - Exit capacity (0.80m) (1.20m) 156 / 100 157 / 150 - - - 156 / 100 Total exit capacity first (main) floor 313 / 250 Balcony main exit route Main exit door (1.65m) Open stairways (1.20m) Ground floor exit (1.65m) - - Exit capacity 323 / 300 157 / 150 323 / 300 - - 157 / 150 Balcony secondary exit route Exterior Sec. exit door stairways - - - Exit capacity (0.80m) (1.20m) 156 / 100 157 / 150 - - - 156 / 100 Total exit capacity balcony 313 / 250 Second floor exit route Second floor exit (0.80m) Second floor stairway (1.10m) Main exit door (1.65m) Open stairways (1.20m) Ground floor exit (1.65m) Exit capacity 156 / 100 144 / 100 323 / 300 157 / 150 323 / 300 144 / 100 Total exit capacity second floor 144 / 100

Smoke management Individual HVAC per floor side Smoke exhaust Local code x IBC Smoke exhaust - Offices Design flow: 16,000 m³/h (per side) Calculated NFPA 92: Max. HRR = 600 kw zz ll = 0.166 (XX QQ) 2/5 = 1.33mm mm pppppppppp = 0.071 XX QQ 1 3 zz 5 3 + + 0.018 XX QQ = 4.51kkkk/ss TT SS = TT 0 + KK ss XX QQ mm CC pp = 338KK ρρ = PP aaaaaa RR TT = 101,325 287 338 = 1.04kkkk/mmm VV = mm ρρ = 4.34mm3 ss = 15,600mmm/h

Smoke management Smoke exhaust Car parking garage Design flow: 33,400 m³/h Calculated NFPA 92: Max. HRR = 1,500 kw VV = 34,300 mmm/h Smoke exhaust - Theater Design flow: 88,000 m³/h Calculated NFPA 92: Max. HRR = 2,800 kw VV = 101,300 mmm/h

Performance based design Pre-movement (SFPE HB Table 64.5/64.11) Movement times (Method 1) Pauls / Fruin (Method 2) Hydraulic model of egress FFFF = FFFF ww ee tttttttt = PP/FFFF Exit route element Maximum specific flow (persons/min/ft of effective width) Corridor, aisle, ramp, doorway 24.0 Stairs (178mm riser / 279mm tread) 18.5 (Method 3) Theater occupancy: Pathfinder simulation

Performance based design Offices Pauls / Fruin ttttttvv ffffffffffffffffffff = 0.70 + 0.0133 1667 = 22.9 mmmmmmmmmmmmmm Hydraulic model of egress ttttttvv ffffffffffffffffffff = 1650 78 = 21.2 mmmmmmmmmmmmmm ttttttvv ffffffffff = 110 78 = 1.4mmmmmmmmmmmmmm = 85 ssssssssssssss

Performance based design Car Parking garage Pauls / Fruin Hydraulic model of egress ttttttvv ffffffffffffffffffff = 0.70 + 0.0133 490 = 7.7 mmmmmmmmmmmmmm ttttttvv ffffffffffffffffffff = 485 78 = 6.2 mmmmmmmmmmmmmm ttttttvv ffffffffff = 97 78 = 1.24mmmmmmmmmmmmmm = 75 ssssssssssssss

Performance based design Theater Pauls/Fruin: Not applicable Hydraulic model of egress ttttttvv ffffffffffffffffffff = 156 54 Pathfinder simulation: 132 seconds = 2.9 mmmmmmmmmmmmmm = 174 ssssssssssssss

Performance based design Offices design fire NRIFD Japan (SFPE Hb figure 26.70) α=0.012 kw/s² - medium growth HRR constant after sprinkler activation

Performance based design Theater design fire The Fire Protection Research Foundation. (2009). Fire Safety in Theaters - A New Design Approach. α=0.0469 kw/s² - fast growth HRR constant after sprinkler activation

Performance based design Design fire Lund University. (2010). Selecting Design Fires. Department of Fire Safety Engineering and Systems Safety. Tenability criteria Society of Fire Safety Engineers Australia - NSW Chapter. (2014). Practice Note for Tenability Criteria in Building Fires Exposure less than 10 minutes

Performance based design

Performance based design Visibility @ 1.8m 255 s RSET+1.5 (MoS) = 218 s ASET > 255 s ASET > RSET+ MoS = PASS

Performance based design

Visibility @ 1.8m 388 s RSET+1.5 (MoS) = 345 s Performance ASET > 388 s based design ASET > RSET + MoS = PASS

Visibility @ 1.8m 120 s RSET+1.5 (MoS) = 270 s Performance ASET = 107 s based design ASET < RSET + MoS = FAIL

PROPOSED scenario Change in smoke exhaust Performance Visibility @ 1.8m 250 s based design RSET+1.4 (MoS) = 255 s ASET = 255 s ASET > RSET + MoS = PASS

Performance based design STAGE STAGE Main floor Balcony

Balcony Visibility @ 1.8m 140 s Performance based design RSET+1.5 (MoS) = 120 s ASET = 140 s ASET > RSET + MoS = PASS Main Floor Visibility @ 1.8m 370 s RSET+1.5 (MoS) = 321 s ASET > 370 s ASET > RSET + MoS = PASS

Conclusions Occupants layout changes critical for fire safety Exit remoteness (LSC minimize potential for two exits blocked by fire) Core type buildings with elevators, service shafts, and stairs in one central or side core introduce some challenging proglems with respect to exit remoteness (NFPA 101HB, 7.5.1.3.1) Local codes positive factors: Conservative for vertical fire spread Larger exit capacity sizing Brazilian codes main weaknesses are related to: Means of egress (number, arrangement, scissor stairs, etc) Fire suppresion developed fires (standpipes flow x pressure) Reliability of water supplies: installation, equipment certification, etc Lack of detailed inspection, test and maintenance standards Other comments presented in the report

Questions? Fabio Renato Zocal Mazza fabiormazza@gmail.com