Fire Safety Evaluation of Existing Manufactured Educational Building Covered by Section 423 of the Florida Building Code

Similar documents
PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHODS

COMPLIANCE ALTERNATIVES

COMPLIANCE ALTERNATIVES

PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHODS

PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHODS

Chapter 2: Definitions

For the Florida Building Commission And the Fire Code Advisory Council

SPRINKLER PROTECTION OF COMBUSTIBLE CONCEALLED SPACES WITH LESS THAN 6 BETWEEN OPPOSITE FACES IN CAVITY.

January 1, 2014 Mandatory Effective Date

CHAPTER 7 ALTERATIONS LEVEL

NFPA 101, 2012 EDITION IMPACT ON NEW AND EXISTING HEALTH CARE FACILITIES

WORKSHEET 2-1 THE MANITOBA RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY FIRE RISK INDEX FIRE SAFETY PARAMETER VALUES

Changes to NFPA 101A 2013 Edition for Health Care Facilities

Will Clay Spring 2014

CODE SUMMARY REQUIREMENTS (NEW CONSTRUCTION/TENANT IMPROVEMENT (TI))

GROUP SR SPECIAL RESIDENCE (ASSISTED SELF-PRESERVATION) OCCUPANCIES

The Goals and Objectives of Project FAIL-SAFE

Public. Mike Free Health. State of Alabama Department of

Public Health Fax: Web Site:

SCHOOL DISTRICT PALM BEACH COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW CHECK LIST -- ELECTRICAL

FIRE INSPECTORS GUIDELINES FOR PLAN REVIEWS AND INSPECTIONS OF NEW CONSTRUCTION / ADDITIONS AND CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY

SPECIAL DETAILED REQUIREMENTS BASED ON USE AND OCCUPANCY

COSTCO, SAN FRANCISCO A PRESCRIPTIVE AND PERFORMANCE BASED ANALYSIS OF FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND DESIGN

PROPOSED CODE CHANGES FOR REVIEW BY THE FIRE CODE ACTION COMMITTEE

GROUP SR SPECIAL (ASSISTED SELF-PRESERVATION) OCCUPANCIES

SPECIAL DETAILED REQUIREMENTS BASED ON USE AND OCCUPANCY

Agency for Health Care Administration

CHAPTER 61G15-32 RESPONSIBILITY RULES OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS CONCERNING THE DESIGN OF FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS

Moreno Valley Fire Department Fire Prevention Bureau. New and Existing Fire Alarm & Signaling Systems Guideline

SPECIAL DETAILED REQUIREMENTS BASED ON USE AND OCCUPANCY

Questions for the HFD regarding Bill 69, Evaluation Worksheet for High-Rise Residential Buildings User s Guide ( New User s Guide or NUG )

Open to Below: A Discussion of Allowed Floor Openings. Jay A. Ierardi, Ph.D., P.E., LEED AP. Kevin S. Hastings, P.E., LEED AP

9/23/ :20 AM. Second Revision No NFPA [ Section No ] Supplemental Information. Submitter Information Verification

Building & Fire Code Academy. Building Better With Our Greatest Resource Education. Welcome!

H BUTCH BROWNING FIRE MARSHAL BUILDING REHABILITATION

International Fire Code 2006 Requirements for Construction Plan Reviews of Commercial and Multi-Family Structures

DECLARATORY STATEMENT. THIS CAUSE came on for consideration upon the Petition for Declaratory

WORKSHEET 3-1 THE MANITOBA OFFICE OCCUPANCY FIRE RISK INDEX FIRE SAFETY PARAMETER VALUES

Human Factors - Egress Analysis for High Hazard Occupancies. Presented by: Michael J. Klemenz, PE, SFPE

SANTA ROSA FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU INSPECTION GUIDELINE RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITIES 2007 CBC/CFC (R-3.1)

Taming the Health Care Building Codes NFPA vs. The International and Chicago Building Codes JENSEN & HALSTEAD LTD.

FIRE/SMOKE BARRIER FUNDAMENTALS

Date: February 22, 2005 Kimbalton DUSEL, Pre-S-2 Submittal CNA0402 PRELIMINARY CODE REVIEW. International Plumbing Code Edition

rpsa FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERS

MINOOKA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Fire Prevention Bureau Fire Inspector Rodney Bradberry

SPECIAL DETAILED REQUIREMENTS BASED ON USE AND OCCUPANCY

Richard B. Alpert, P.E. Senior FPE, Clark Nexsen

FIRE SAFETY UPGRADING CONSIDERATIONS for EXISTING SENIOR CITIZEN LODGES

Agency for Health Care Administration

THE 2012 EDITION OF THE LIFE SAFETY CODE HOSPITAL EDITION SESSION #5

Florida Building Code Chapter 9 Fire Protection Systems Advanced Course

Retain. Retain. Retain. Board Advisory. Board Advisory. Retain. Disposition. (Statute, Rule, FBC, Industry)

First Revision No NFPA [ Global Input ] Submitter Information Verification. Committee Statement

California Fire Code (CFC) Part III contains requirements. Building and Equipment Design Features PART. Chapters 5 through 19

Table EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE a OCCUPANCY SYSTEM SYSTEM. A, E, F-1, I-1, M, b,d R, S-1. B c. F-2, S-2, U c

SANTA ROSA FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST FIRE ALARM SYSTEM INSTALLATION

9/20/2016 2:53 PM. Second Revision No NFPA [ Section No ] Supplemental Information. Submitter Information Verification

Delayed Action Closer. Mechanical self-closing device that incorporates an adjustable delay prior to the initiation of closing.

Health Care Facility Rehabilitation

Fire and Smoke Door Inspections Qualified Training 02/03/17

NFPA 101 Code Update from 2012 Edition to the 2015 Edition

Residential Based Care Facility Guidelines

MOBILE FIRE - RESCUE DEPARTMENT FIRE CODE ADMINISTRATION

Riverside County Fire Department Office of the Fire Marshal Market St., Ste. 150, Riverside, CA Ph. (951) Fax (951)

3/6/2018. Design Tips For Fire and Smoke Barriers. Professional Development Hours (PDH) Certificates. Copyright Materials

DEALING WITH FIRE SAFETY

Fire Department Of New York

FIRE INSPECTION GUIDELINES FOR FOSTER GROUP HOME PARENTS Effective June 1, 2002, Update September 2011

CONSTRUCT JTC/TRS FACILITY FTEV

NFPA 45 NFPA 211 NFPA 1600

For additional information regarding R-3.1 residential care facilities please contact (951)

MANDATORY MEASURES INDOOR LIGHTING CONTROLS. (Reference: Sub-Chapter 4, Section 130.1)

Narrative Reports As Regulated by 780 CMR, Section 903.0

2007 CBC & CFC Residential Care Facility Requirements (24 hour care only)

CIDA Curriculum Matrix - Miami University First Year

BUILDING CODE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK. New York City Department of Buildings 4 June 2007

Agency for Health Care Administration

Fire Protection Analysis DCI Data Center Building

CORRALES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL TENANT IMPROVEMENT 5500 WILSHIRE AVE NE ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87113

WORKSHEET 4-1 THE MANITOBA FIRE RISK INDEX FOR THE RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY OF HERITAGE BUILDINGS FIRE SAFETY PARAMETERS

The Residences at Christina Landing Wilmington, DE

Module 3. Water-Based Suppression Systems (WBSS) Part II: Highlights of Code Requirements

ANALYSIS OF SMOKE MOVEMENT IN A BUILDING VIA ELEVATOR SHAFTS

Florida Building Code 2010

MULTI-LEVEL & COVERED BOOTH CONDITIONS

Amend Base Code. Amend Base Code. Amend Base Code. Disposition. (Statute, Rule, FBC, Industry) Y/N

Report on First Revisions with Statement June 2014 NFPA 101

Delayed Action Closer. Mechanical self-closing device that incorporates an adjustable delay prior to the initiation of closing.

MANDATORY MEASURES MANDATORY LIGHTING CONTROLS (a) Area Controls: Manual controls that control lighting in each area separately

FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION*

Fire Hazard Analysis of Technical Area 53 Building 1

CHAPTER A-6 FIRE PROTECTION

SURREY FIRE SERVICE. Construction Fire Safety Plan Bulletin

Based on NFPA 1001: Standard for Fire Fighter Professional Qualifications, 2013 Edition.

New DATE OF BLDG. PERMIT OR PLAN APPROVAL: SURVEYOR (SIGNATURE) TITLE OFFICE DATE REVIEW AUTHORITY OFFICIAL (SIGNATURE) TITLE OFFICE DATE

NFPA 914 CODE FOR FIRE PROTECTION OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES

Full Service Central Station Fire Alarm Listing Evaluation

NFPA Changes

Minimum Standards for Engineers Practicing Fire Protection Engineering in the State of Oklahoma September 14, 2016

City of South Salt Lake Fire Code Training Exiting, Egress Systems and Egress Control

Transcription:

Walker Engineering, Inc. 833 Rockingham Road Birmingham Alabama 35235-2625 205-854-0160 205-854-0160 (Fax) Fire Safety Evaluation of Existing Manufactured Educational Building Covered by Section 423 of the Florida Building Code Department of Community Affairs Codes and Standards 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 850-487-1824 Suncom 277-1824 850-414-8436 (Fax) Prepared by Gary W. Walker, P.E. Disclaimer: This report covers a specific single modular classroom and a specific cluster building and may not address all of the concerns of the Authority having Jurisdiction. Page 1 of 20

Scope: Task 1: Perform a fire safety evaluation of the existing manufactured modular classroom and educational building composed of 12 modular classrooms. The fire safety evaluation was done based on the criteria in Chapter 12 COMPLIANCE ALTERNATIVES of the Florida Building Code for Existing Buildings, Section 1201.6 Evaluation process. Task 2: Investigate using Section 104.11 Alternative materials, design and methods of construction and equipment of the Florida Building Code, Buildings using the SFPE Engineering Guide to Performance-Based Fire Protection Analysis and Design of Buildings as another evaluation method to determine the fire safety of these buildings. The fire safety of the manufactured modular classroom and educational building is to be based on the minimal type of construction allowed under Section 423.8.3 Construction type. The evaluation was based on a Type IIB construction with cement bonded particle board (CBPB) floor system. This evaluation was limited to the designs as described on the drawings (See references). References: 1. Florida Building Code, Building 2004 edition with 2006 Supplement 2. Florida Building Code, Existing Building 2004 edition with 2006 Supplement 3. Classroom drawing file CRA0549.14 drawings 4. Building drawing file CRA06045-01 Task 1: Singular Modular Classroom: The classroom is a single story building of 840 ft² (23 4 by 36 0 ). The classroom has a single exit and three windows and a restroom facility for one occupant. Classroom Evaluation under Section 1201.6: 1201.6.1.1 Height formula AH = Allowable height in feet from FBCB Table 503 AH = 55 feet (Type IIB construction) EBH = Existing building height in feet EBH = ½ + 1-½ + 6 + 10 6 + ¾ + 10 + 24 = 14 ¾ Page 2 of 20

AH EBH = 55 14 -¾ = 40 11-¼ CF = 1 if AH EBH is positive Height Value, feet = AH EBH x CF 12.5 Height Value, feet = (55 14 ¾ )1 = (40 11-¼ )1 = 3.275 12.5 12.5 AS = Allowable height in stories from FBCB Table 503 AS = 2 stories EBS = Existing building height in stories EBS = 1 story Height Value, stories = AS EBS x CF Height Value, stories = (2 1)1 = 1 Use Height Value, stories = (2 1)1 = 1 1201.6.2.1 Allowable area formula I s = Percent area increase due to sprinkler protection I s = 0% I f = Percent area increase due to frontage I f = 0% A t = Allowable area per floor from FBCB Table 503 A t = 14,500 sq ft (Type IIB construction) A a = Allowable area per floor A a = (100 + I s + I f ) x A t = Allowable area per floor from FBCB Table 503 100 A a = (100 + 0 + 0)14,500 ft² = 14,500 ft² 100 Page 3 of 20

1201.6.2.2 Area formula Actual area = (23 4 )(36 0 ) = 840 ft² Area Value = Allowable area (1 Actual area) 1,200 ft² Allowable area Area Value = 14,500 ft²(1 840 ft² ) = 14,500 ft²(1 0.058) = 11.38 1,200 ft² 14,500 ft² 1,200 ft² 1201.6.3 Compartmentation Compartment size = Actual area = (23 4 )(36 0 ) = 840 ft² Compartment category = Category e Compartment value, CV = 20 FBCB Table 1201.6.3 1201.6.4 Tenant and Dwelling Unit Separation Not applicable 1201.6.5 Corridors Walls Not applicable 1201.6.6 Vertical Opening Not applicable 1201.6.7 HVAC Systems HVAC system category = Category d HVAC value = 0 Page 4 of 20

1201.6.8 Automatic Fire Detection Automatic fire detection category = Category a (Worse case scenario based on classroom not having a closet.) Automatic fire detection value = -4 1201.6.9 Fire Alarm System Fire alarm system category = Category c (Worse case scenario based on plans requiring fire alarm installed by others.) Fire alarm system value = 0 1201.6.10 Smoke Control Smoke control system category = Category a Smoke control system value = 0 1201.6.11 Means of Egress Capacity Means of egress capacity category = Category c (Worse case scenario based on no secondary door being provided.) Means of egress capacity value = 2 1201.6.12 Dead Ends Not applicable (Classroom is not required to have more than one means of egress.) 1201.6.13 Maximum Exit Access Travel Distance Maximum allowable travel distance = 75 feet Actual allowable travel distance = 45 feet Page 5 of 20

Maximum exit access travel distance value = 20(Maximum Allowable Travel Distance Maximum Actual Travel Distance) Maximum Allowable Travel Distance Maximum exit access travel distance value = 20(75 45 ) = 8 75 1201.6.14 Elevator Control Elevator control value = 0 1201.6.15 Means of Egress Emergency Lighting Means of egress emergency lighting category = Category c Means of egress emergency lighting value = 1 1201.6.16 Mixed Occupancies Mixed occupancies value = 0 1201.6.17 Automatic Sprinklers Automatic sprinklers category = Category c Automatic sprinklers category value = 0 1201.6.18 Standpipes Standpipes category = Category b Standpipes category value = 0 1201.6.19 Incidental Use Area Protection Incidental use area protection required = none Page 6 of 20

Incidental use area protection provided = none Incidental use area protection value = 0 SAFETY PARAMETERS Single Modular Classroom Summary Evaluation Process FIRE SAFETY (FS) MEANS OF EGRESS (ME) GENERAL SAFETY (GS) 1201.6.1 Building Height 1 1 1 1201.6.2 Building Area 11 11 11 1201.6.3 Compartmentation 20 20 20 1201.6.4 Tenant and Dwelling Unit Separation 0 0 0 1201.6.5 Corridors Walls 0 0 0 1201.6.6 Vertical Opening 0 0 0 1201.6.7 HVAC Systems 0 0 0 1201.6.8 Automatic Fire Detection -4-4 -4 1201.6.9 Fire Alarm System 0 0 0 1201.6.10 Smoke Control 0 0 1201.6.11 Means of Egress Capacity 2 2 1201.6.12 Dead Ends 0 0 1201.6.13 Maximum Exit Access Travel Distance 8 8 1201.6.14 Elevator Control 0 0 0 1201.6.15 Means of Egress Emergency Lighting 1 1 1201.6.16 Mixed Occupancies 0 0 1201.6.17 Automatic Sprinklers 0 0 0 1201.6.18 Standpipes 0 0 1201.6.19 Incidental Use Area Protection 0 0 0 Building Score Total Value 28 39 39 Occupancy Mandatory Safety Scores MEANS FIRE OF SAFETY EGRESS (FS) (ME) GENERAL SAFETY (GS) Education 29 40 40 Page 7 of 20

Evaluation Formulas Formula Calculations Pass/Fail FS MFS > 0 28 29 = -1 Fail ME MME 0 39 40 = -1 Fail GS MGS 0 39 40 = -1 Fail Page 8 of 20

Conclusion for Classroom: The fire safety evaluation of the classroom indicates that the classroom is below the mandatory fire safety criteria of Section 1201.6. The evaluation scores can be improved to meet or exceed the mandatory fire safety criteria by one or more of the following actions. Several of these features may already have been completed during the installation of the classroom since the drawings. The drawings indicate that several of these fire safety features were to be done by others during the installation of the classroom. If any of these fire safety features were installed by others, the evaluation scores will increase sufficiently to meet or exceed the mandatory fire safety criteria. Automatic Fire Detection: If smoke detectors indicated on the drawings have been installed, the Automatic Fire Detection Category can be changed from a Category a with a value of -4 to a Category c or Category d or Category e. A change to a Category c or Category d or Category e will increase the evaluation scores to more than the mandatory safety scores of Section 1201.8 require for Educational Occupancy. A Category c will require the installation of smoke detectors in the HVAC system to prevent the distribution of smoke within the classroom by the HVAC system. The activation of the smoke detector will shut down the HVAC system and sound an alarm in the classroom. The activation of the smoke detector may also sound an alarm at a central station, if the classroom is part of a larger school facility. The evaluation value of a Category c is zero. A Category d will require the installation of smoke detectors in the ceilings of the restroom and closet. The activation of any smoke detectors will sound an alarm in the classroom. The activation of any smoke detector may also sound an alarm at a central station, if the classroom is part of a larger school facility. The evaluation value of a Category d is 4. A Category e will require the installation of smoke detectors in the ceilings of the classroom, restroom, and closet. The activation of any smoke detector will sound an alarm in the classroom. The activation of any smoke detector may also sound an alarm at a central station, if the classroom is part of a larger school facility. The evaluation value of a Category e is 8. Fire Alarm: If the manual fire alarm system indicated on the drawings has been installed, the Fire Alarm Category can be changed from a Category c with a value of zero to Category d or Category e. The change to a Category e will increase the evaluation scores to more than the mandatory safety scores of Section 1201.8 require for Educational Occupancy. A Category d will require the installation of a fire alarm in accordance with NFPA 72. Since the classroom is not required by the Florida Building Code to have a manual fire alarm, the installation of the fire alarm will exceed the minimum code requirement. The evaluation value of a Category d is 3. Page 9 of 20

A Category e will require the installation of a fire alarm in accordance with NFPA 72 with an emergency voice/alarm communication system and a fire command station to comply with Section 403.8. The evaluation value of a Category e is 5. Automatic Sprinklers: Automatic sprinklers are not required and were not provided so the evaluation category is Category c. Changing the Category c with a value of zero to Category f will increase the evaluation scores to more than the mandatory safety scores of Section 1201.8 require for Educational Occupancy. A Category f will require the installation of a sprinkler system complying with Section 903.3.1.1. The evaluation value of a Category f is 18. Summary: To develop evaluation scores that are equal to or exceed the required mandatory safety scores, it will be necessary to install at least one of the following six modifications: Automatic Fire Detection (smoke detectors) Category c Category d Category e Fire Alarm (manual fire alarm) Category d Category e Automatic Sprinklers (sprinklers) Category f Page 10 of 20

Task 1: Educational Building: The educational building consists of 12 modular classrooms with an 8 wide exit access corridor along the centerline of the building. The educational building is a single story building with an area of 11,152 ft² (68 0 by 164 0 ). There are six classrooms side by side along each side of the exit access corridor. The exit access is designed as a 1-hour fire rated corridor with a pair of double egress doors at each end. The individual classrooms are composed of two modules with a total length and width of 27 4 by 29 5. The classroom has a single egress door and four egress windows, a restroom facility for one occupant with an adjoining closet. Access to the restroom is through the closet. Building Evaluation under Section 1201.6: 1201.6.1.1 Height formula AH = Allowable height in feet from FBCB Table 503 AH = 55 feet (Type IIB construction) EBH = Existing building height in feet EBH = 12 10-½ + 24 = 14 10-½ AH EBH = 55 14 10-½ = 40 1-½ CF = 1 if AH EBH is positive Height Value, feet = AH EBH x CF 12.5 Height Value, feet = (55 14 10-½ )1 = (40 1-½ )1 = 3.21 12.5 12.5 AS = Allowable height in stories from FBCB Table 503 AS = 2 stories EBS = Existing building height in stories EBS = 1 story Height Value, stories = AS EBS x CF Height Value, stories = (2 1)1 = 1 Page 11 of 20

Use Height Value, stories = (2 1)1 = 1 1201.6.2.1 Allowable area formula I s = Percent area increase due to sprinkler protection I s = 0% I f = Percent area increase due to frontage I f = 0% (Worse case scenario.) A t = Allowable area per floor from FBCB Table 503 A t = 14,500 sq ft (Type IIB construction) A a = Allowable area per floor A a = (100 + I s + I f ) x A t = Allowable area per floor from FBCB Table 503 100 A a = (100 + 0 + 0)14,500 ft² = 14,500 ft² 100 1201.6.2.2 Area formula Actual area = (68 0 )(164 0 ) = 11,152 ft² Area Value = Allowable area (1 Actual area) 1,200 ft² Allowable area Area Value = 14,500 ft²(1 11,152 ft²) = 14,500 ft²(1 0.769) = 2.79 1,200 ft² 14,500 ft² 1,200 ft² 1201.6.3 Compartmentation Compartment size = Actual area = (68 0 )(164 0 ) = 11,152 ft² Compartment category = Category a Compartment value, CV = 4 FBCB Table 1201.6.3 Page 12 of 20

1201.6.4 Tenant and Dwelling Unit Separation Not applicable 1201.6.5 Corridors Walls Corridor wall 1-hour wood stud corridor walls conforming to UL Design U305 Corridor wall category = Category c Corridor wall value = 0 1201.6.6 Vertical Opening Not applicable 1201.6.7 HVAC Systems HVAC system category = Category e HVAC value = 5 1201.6.8 Automatic Fire Detection Automatic fire detection category = Category a Automatic fire detection value = -4 1201.6.9 Fire Alarm System Fire alarm system category = Category c (Worse case scenario based on plans requiring fire alarm installed by others.) Fire alarm system value = 0 Page 13 of 20

1201.6.10 Smoke Control Smoke control system category = Category a Smoke control system value = 0 1201.6.11 Means of Egress Capacity Occupant Load = (29 5 )(27 4 ) (15 9 )(6 1 ) = 708 ft² = 35.4 20 ft²/occupant 20 use 36 occupants Occupant Load = 36 occupants (12 classrooms) = 432 occupants Egress width = 432 occupants (0.2 /occupant) = 86.4 Egress width provided = 2(72 ) = 144 Egress over capacity = 144 = 166% 86.4 Means of egress capacity category = Category c (No credit given for egress windows since egress windows are not exits.) Means of egress capacity value = 2 1201.6.12 Dead Ends Dead end category = Category c Dead end value = 2 1201.6.13 Maximum Exit Access Travel Distance Maximum allowable travel distance = 150 feet Actual allowable travel distance = 123 7 Page 14 of 20

Maximum exit access travel distance value = 20(Maximum Allowable Travel Distance Maximum Actual Travel Distance) Maximum Allowable Travel Distance Maximum exit access travel distance value = 20(150 123 7 ) = 3.52 150 1201.6.14 Elevator Control Elevator control value = 0 1201.6.15 Means of Egress Emergency Lighting Means of egress emergency lighting category = Category c Means of egress emergency lighting value = 4 1201.6.16 Mixed Occupancies No mixed occupancies Mixed occupancies value = 0 1201.6.17 Automatic Sprinklers Automatic sprinklers category = Category c Automatic sprinklers category value = 0 1201.6.18 Standpipes Standpipes category = Category b Standpipes category value = 0 Page 15 of 20

1201.6.19 Incidental Use Area Protection Incidental use area protection required = none Incidental use area protection provided = none Incidental use area protection value = 0 SAFETY PARAMETERS Modular Building Summary Evaluation Process FIRE SAFETY (FS) MEANS OF EGRESS (ME) GENERAL SAFETY (GS) 1201.6.1 Building Height 1 1 1 1201.6.2 Building Area 2.8 2.8 2.8 1201.6.3 Compartmentation 4 4 4 1201.6.4 Tenant and Dwelling Unit Separation 0 0 0 1201.6.5 Corridors Walls 0 0 0 1201.6.6 Vertical Opening 0 0 0 1201.6.7 HVAC Systems 5 5 5 1201.6.8 Automatic Fire Detection -4-4 -4 1201.6.9 Fire Alarm System 0 0 0 1201.6.10 Smoke Control 0 0 1201.6.11 Means of Egress Capacity 2 2 1201.6.12 Dead Ends 2 2 1201.6.13 Maximum Exit Access Travel Distance 3.5 3.5 1201.6.14 Elevator Control 0 0 0 1201.6.15 Means of Egress Emergency Lighting 4 4 1201.6.16 Mixed Occupancies 0 0 1201.6.17 Automatic Sprinklers 0 0 0 1201.6.18 Standpipes 0 0 1201.6.19 Incidental Use Area Protection 0 0 0 Building Score Total Value 8.8 20.3 20.3 Page 16 of 20

Occupancy Mandatory Safety Scores MEANS FIRE OF SAFETY EGRESS (FS) (ME) GENERAL SAFETY (GS) Education 29 40 40 Evaluation Formulas Formula Calculations Pass/Fail FS MFS > 0 8.8 29 = -20.1 Fail ME MME 0 20.3 40 = -19.7 Fail GS MGS 0 20.3 40 = -19.7 Fail Conclusion for Building: The fire safety evaluation of the building indicates that the building is below the mandatory fire safety criteria of Section 1201.6. The evaluation scores can be improved to meet or exceed the mandatory fire safety criteria by adding a sprinkler system and one or more of the following actions for automatic fire detection or fire alarm. Several of these actions under the automatic fire detection or fire alarm may already have been installed during the installation of the classroom since the drawings indicate that several of these fire safety features were to be done by others during the installation of the building. This evaluation was based on a specific building without any knowledge of its site conditions. The site condition may increase the fire safety by providing a separation between the building and other buildings or property lines. In this evaluation no credit was given for this separation (Section 1201.6.2.1). This evaluation would not be accurate for a building with a different configuration. A change in the number and layout of the classrooms could affect the building areas, means of egress capacity, and travel distance. A change in any one of these features would change evaluation scores. Automatic Fire Detection: If smoke detectors indicated on the drawings have been installed, the Automatic Fire Detection Category can be changed from a Category a with a value of -4 to a Category c or Category d or Category e. A change to a Category c or Category d or Category e will not increase the evaluation scores to more than the mandatory safety scores of Section 1201.8 require for Educational Occupancy, but will increase the evaluation scores. A Category c will require the installation of smoke detectors in the HVAC system to prevent the distribution of smoke within the classroom by the HVAC system. The activation Fire Safety of the smoke detector will shut down the HVAC system and sound an alarm in Page 17 of 20

the classroom. The activation of the smoke detector may also sound an alarm at a central station, if the classroom is part of a larger school facility. The evaluation value of a Category c is zero. A Category d will require the installation of smoke detectors in the ceilings of the restroom and closet. The activation of any smoke detectors will sound an alarm in the classroom. The activation of any smoke detector may also sound an alarm at a central station, if the classroom is part of a larger school facility. The evaluation value of a Category d is 4. A Category e will require the installation of smoke detectors in the ceilings of the classroom, restroom, and closet. The activation of any smoke detector will sound an alarm in the classroom. The activation of any smoke detector may also sound an alarm at a central station, if the classroom is part of a larger school facility. The evaluation value of a Category e is 8. Fire Alarm: If the manual fire alarm system indicated on the drawings has been installed, the Fire Alarm Category can be changed from a Category c with a value of zero to Category d or Category e. The change to a Category e will not increase the evaluation scores to more than the mandatory safety scores of Section 1201.8 require for Educational Occupancy, but will increase the evaluation scores. A Category d will require the installation of a fire alarm in accordance with NFPA 72. Since the classroom is not required by the Florida Building Code to have a manual fire alarm, the installation of the fire alarm will exceed the minimum code requirement. The evaluation value of a Category d is 3. A Category e will require the installation of a fire alarm in accordance with NFPA 72 with an emergency voice/alarm communication system and a fire command station to comply with Section 403.8. The evaluation value of a Category e is 5. Automatic Sprinklers: Automatic sprinklers are not required and were not provided so the evaluation category is Category c. Changing the Category c with a value of zero to Category f will not increase the evaluation scores to more than the mandatory safety scores of Section 1201.8 require for Educational Occupancy, but will almost increase the evaluation scores to more than the mandatory safety scores. A Category f will require the installation of a sprinkler system complying with Section 903.3.1.1. The evaluation value of a Category f is 18. Summary: To develop evaluation scores that are equal to or exceed the mandatory safety scores, it will be necessary to install Automatic Sprinklers and either one of the following five modifications: Page 18 of 20

Automatic Fire Detection (smoke detectors) Category c Category d Category e Fire Alarm (manual fire alarm) Category d Category e Page 19 of 20

Task 2: SFPE Engineering Guide to Performance-Based Fire Protection Analysis and Design of Buildings: Evaluation using these guidelines requires site specific knowledge of the building. The evaluation under these guidelines will require the computer modeling of a specific building including modeling of the fire, and the occupants. Due the lack of site specific information or data, it is impractical to perform such an analysis at the state level. This evaluation including the perimeters for conducting the evaluation may be done by the authority having jurisdiction for their specific buildings through coordination with a Fire Protection Engineer. Page 20 of 20