HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION. 62 Union Street. Prepared By:

Similar documents
HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION. 37 Church Street East. Prepared By:

L 2-1 HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION. Cheyne Family Cemetery. Main Street South

L 4-1. Heritage Report: Reasons for Heritage Designation. Kodors House. 35 Rosedale Avenue West

L 3-1. Heritage Report: Reasons for Heritage Designation. Peter Archdekin Farmhouse Mayfield Road

L 1-1. Reason. ns for Heritage Designa

HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION

Authority: North York Community Council Item 31.7, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on May 6, 7 and 8, 2014 CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No.

L 3-1. Heritage Report: Reasons for Heritage Designation. Wiley Bridge Gorewood Drive, Claireville Conservation Area

Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Roncesvalles Avenue

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING ON MONDAY AUGUST 28, 2017 JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

Authorization to Study Potential Heritage Conservation Districts (HCD) under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act

Garden District Heritage Conservation District Study

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE34.30, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on August 25, 26, 27 and 28, 2014 CITY OF TORONTO

Memo. B R A Y H e r i t a g e

Mayfield West Phase 2 Secondary Plan

Baby Point Heritage Conservation District Study. Kick-off Community Meeting March 27, 2017 Humbercrest United Church

2154 Dundas Street West Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act

a) buildings, structures and artifacts of historical significance;

Cookstown Heritage Conservation District Study Public Consultation March 26, 2013

2: Bond Street, I.O.F Orphanage

Historic Resources Inventory Evaluation Form

Ordnance Street 110 Plan OS Lot 413 B202; parts of Lot 412 and portion of Lot 413

HERITAGE REPORT REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION

Historic Yonge Street HCD Plan Community Consultation October 14, 2015

VILLAGE OF BOLTON HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

HISTORICAL AND SOCIAL SIGNIFICANCE PHOTOGRAPH: M.VAIR-PIOVA, 2014

King-Spadina HCD Study

TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS GUIDE

Architectural Inventory Form

43: 2165 Dundas St. West, Smith-Carrique Barn and Shed

Toronto Preservation Board Toronto and East York Community Council. Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division

52: 2182 Lakeshore Road East, Horizons

RE: Report CDS (Municipal Heritage Committee Minutes May 8, 2018) Randwood Estate

Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act 844 Don Mills Road and 1150 Eglinton Avenue East

Chapter 6 cultural heritage

57: 2031 North Service Road West, Hilton Farm

THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LOCAL LANDMARK NOMINATION INSTRUCTIONS

Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement Queen's Park

9: 204 & 240 Front Street, George Street Parkette & Dingle Park. 1. Description of Property. Name (if applicable) Legal Description

APPENDIX 9 HERITAGE CHARACTER

THE AVENUES HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT STUDY BUILDING INVENTORY SHEET

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT

CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES POLICIES

L 9-1. ons for Heritage Designatiion. brook Farrm Clarkway Drive

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE ON TUESDAY MARCH 29, 2016

Heritage Designation Brief. Bonner Worth Mill: Administration Building

Ottawa Historic Resources Inventory: Commercial Historic District Building Information. Significance and Potential Eligibility

Cookstown Heritage Conservation District Plan Heritage Workshop Public Open House September 10, 2013

Municipal Inventory of Cultural Heritage Properties - St. Joseph Inventory of Designated and Potential Heritage Properties

Heritage Property 70 Liberty Street (Central Prison Chapel)

This property contributes to the historic streetscape of Colborne Street and its striking architecture makes it a landmark along the street.

CITY OF VAUGHAN REPORT NO. 5 OF THE HERITAGE VAUGHAN COMMITTEE

KING-SPADINA COMMERCIAL HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN COMMUNITY CONSULTATION MEETING #1

Planning Justification Brief

7437, 7439 and 7441 Kingston Road - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - Preliminary Report

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

NEW EDINBURGH HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

HISTORIC SITE FORM - HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (10-08) 1 IDENTIFICATION

112 College Street Zoning Amendment Application Preliminary Report

Recommended Heritage Designation

Cultural Heritage Landscapes Strategy

Broadview Avenue Properties Inclusion on Heritage Inventory

TOWN OF AURORA ARCHITECTURAL SALVAGE PROGRAM GUIDE

CITY OF MIAMI CEMETERY 1800 N.E. 2 AVENUE

SUBJECT: Report recommending 563 North Shore Boulevard East remain on the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources

11.1 INTRODUCTION. The characteristics of these areas are briefly discussed below.

Morgan s Subdivision Historic District Character-defining Features

58: 1285 Sedgewick Crescent, Rotary Gardens

FIRST COCONUT GROVE SCHOOLHOUSE

50: 1475 Lakeshore Road East, Ryrie Estate

HISTORIC SITE FORM - HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (10-08)

Architectural Inventory Form (page 1 of 5)

21: Sovereign Street, Streetscape

HISTORIC SITE FORM - HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (10-08) 1 IDENTIFICATION

Report to Rapport au: Built Heritage Sub-Committee / Sous-comité du patrimoine bâti December 10, 2015 / 10 décembre and / et

Architectural Inventory Form

6: 2417 Fourth Line, Sixteen Hollow, Lion Valley Park

and Richmond Street West - Official Plan Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

APPENDIX F CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCE ASSESSMENT

HERITAGE STATEMENT AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT HILLBARK FARMHOUSE FRANKBY

Heritage Designation Brief

Sainte-Catherine Street West

Purchase Proposal Call for the Former St. Louis School 75 Allen Street East Addendum #3 12-June-2013

Name / Date of Reason for Designation. 1. Ball s Mill c.1842 A good example of a mill in neo-classical style

Blackfriars/Petersville Heritage Conservation District Study

10 Park Lawn Rd - Zoning Amendment Application- Preliminary Report

Cultural Landscape Heritage Impact Statement Terms of Reference

Purpose of Report...1. Planning Framework Provincial Policy Statement Draft PPS...2. Ontario Heritage Act...3

HISTORIC SITE FORM - HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (10-08) 1 IDENTIFICATION

St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Focused Area - Official Plan Amendment Status Report

CITY CLERK. Parkland Acquisition Strategic Directions Report (All Wards)

HISTORIC SITE FORM - HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (10-08) 1 IDENTIFICATION

393, 395, 397, 399, 401 and 403 Spring Garden Avenue Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

HISTORIC SITE FORM - HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (10-08) 1 IDENTIFICATION

13 THORNHILL YONGE STREET STUDY IMPLEMENTATION CITY OF VAUGHAN OPA 669 AND TOWN OF MARKHAM OPA 154

Part A. District Overview. Thornhill-Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan 1

Attachment 1 TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH. Manual for the Preparation of an Urban Design Report

ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD

20 & 30 Frank Nighbor Place

2.2.1 Scope of Preliminary Cultural Heritage Landscape Inventory

Transcription:

L 3-1 1 Brampton Heritage Board Date: January 18, 2011 HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION 62 Union Street Prepared By: Prepared by: Antonietta Minichillo, Heritage Coordinator Planning, Design & Development Urban Design Section Corporation of the City of Brampton, City Hall 2 Wellington Street West Brampton, Ontario L6Y 4R2

L 3-2 2 PROFILE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: ROLL NUMBER 10-01-0-001-20200-0000 PIN NUMBER 141280144 MUNICIPAL ADDRESS 62 Union Street WARD NUMBER 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PLAN BR 2 PT LOTS 103, 104 RP SECONDARY PLAN PROPERTY NAME 62 Union Street CURRENT OWNER Roger and Esther Mercer CRITERIA GRADE B CURRENT ZONING OWNER CONCURRENCE? Yes / No CURRENT USES AND FUNCTIONS PREVIOUS OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS CONSTRUCTION OR CREATION DATE RESOURCES ON SUBJECT PROPERTY INCLUDED IN DESIGNATION (circle) RELEVANT COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS Occupied Daniel Macdonald and Debora Anne Vance c. 1871 Building Cemetery-Burial site Structure-object Historic site Cultural heritage landscape

L 3-3 3 1.0 REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION: The property at 62 Union Street is worthy of designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage value or interest. The property meets the criteria for designation prescribed by Province of Ontario (Ontario Heritage Act, Regulation 9/06) under the three categories of design or physical value, historical value and contextual value. 1.1 STATEMENT EXPLAINING THE CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE OR INTEREST OF THE PROPERTY The cultural heritage value of 62 Union Street is related to its design or physical value as a Gothic Revival cottage. The Gothic Revival period in Canadian architecture was popular between 1830 and 1860. Gothic Revival was widely used for churches, colleges and other public buildings, but residential homes were also built in the style. Although grand homes were rare, many Carpenter Gothic cottages were built according to common models. These cottages incorporated Gothic features such as pointed arches, steep gables and towers, and vertical board-and-batten siding, and were often painted pale shades of grey and blue. Relatively few examples survive because the style s frame structure and adornments require constant upkeep. Built in the early 1870s, 62 Union Street is located in the residential district near Union Street and Alexander Street. It is nestled between two significant historical sites: St. Andrew Presbyterian Church (1847), and Brampton s first public school, Central Grammar School (1856). The house is distinguished by its pointed arch window with shutters, front centre gable, veranda with bell cast roof, and boxed eaves. The house appears to be in excellent condition. The property also has historical or associative value as it can be associated with Brampton s earliest settlers, particularly T.E. Campbell. Campbell was the caretaker of one of Brampton s significant historical site, St. Andrews Presbyterian Church. Land records for Lot 104 (43R 1399, Part 1) indicate that William Stork sold part of Lot 104 to George Greene in 1866 for $100.00. Greene sold part of Lot 104 along with part of Lot 103 to Caroline Atkin. Samuel Atkin sold part of the property to Thomas Moron in 1870 for $162.50. William Spence purchased the property in 1871 for $170.00. The present house was probably built in the early 1870s. Spence sold the property in 1880 to R.P. Campbell for $700.00. The Collector s Rolls (1887 and 1888) indicate that R.P. Campbell leased part of Lot 104, valued at $700.00, to Thomas E. Campbell. The Assessment Roll (1893) notes caretaker Thomas Campbell as the owner of part of Lot 104, valued at $600.00, with a building on the property. The Census Return (1901) records Thomas Campbell as the caretaker of St. Andrews Presbyterian Church. Campbell, his wife Annie, and four children lived in a roughcast house on Lot 102, Union Street.

L 3-4 4 The Campbell family continued to own the property until 1923, when Charles and May Bailey acquired it. The Bailey family sold the property in 1973. Might s Directory notes Mrs. Chas Bailey as the resident of 62 Union Street in 1964. The cultural heritage value of the property is also connected to its contextual value as it maintains, supports, and defines the character of Brampton. The property is associated with the 19 th century residential district around Central Grammar School. The statement explaining the cultural heritage value or interest of the property, including a description of the heritage attributes of the property along with all other components of the Heritage Report: Statement of Reasons for Heritage Designation, constitute the "reason for heritage designation" required under the Ontario Heritage Act. 1.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES OF THE PROPERTY: Unless otherwise indicated, the reason(s) for designation apply generally to all exterior elevations, facades, foundation, roof and roof trim, all doors, windows, other structural openings and associated trim, all architectural detailing, construction materials of wood, stone, brick, plaster parging, metal and glazing and related building techniques, fencing, all trees, shrubs, hedgerows, other vegetation and the grounds and vistas generally. To ensure that the cultural heritage value of this property is conserved, certain heritage attributes that contribute to its value have been identified specifically and they include: Design / Physical Value: Original form of the Carpenter s Gothic cottage 1½ storeys, 3 bays Pointed arch window with shutters Front centre gable Veranda with bell cast roof Windows on side elevation with shaped heads Historical / Associative Value: Associated with the residential area around Brampton s first public school, Central Grammar School Associated with the early settlement of Brampton Familiar structure within the Union Street/Alexander Street neighbourhood 2.0 GENERAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: The property is situated in the former Chinguacousy Township.

L 3-5 5 The lot is rectangular shaped. The frontage covers 42.57 feet. The plan of the principle structure is a simple rectangular shape. The principle elevation (main façade) is emphasized by the following elements: Pointed arch window with shutters Front centre gable Open veranda Stucco exterior wall is painted light grey Landscaping elements include: Decorative flowers, bushes and trees Well-maintained lawn Adjacent Property features include: The historic Central Grammar School to the west St. Andrew s Presbyterian Church to the east Surrounding houses which vary in style and size Mature trees line the street 3.0 HERITAGE EVALUATION / CRITERIA NOTE: The subject property meets the criteria for designation prescribed by the Province of Ontario under Ontario Heritage Act Regulation 9/06. The property was listed in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources in the late 1990s. It was rated a Category B. 4.0 POLICY FRAMEWORK In the context of land use planning, the Province of Ontario has declared that the wise use and management of Ontario s cultural heritage resources is a key provincial interest. A set of Provincial Policy Statements (PPS) provides planning policy direction on matters of provincial interest in Ontario. These statements set the policy framework for regulating the development and use of land. The current set of policies was last reviewed in 2005. At that time the cultural heritage policies were strengthened considerably. The relevant heritage policy statement is PPS 2.6.1, which states that: significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved.

L 3-6 6 PPS 2.6.1 is tied to Section 3 of the Ontario Planning Act which stipulates that land use planning decisions by municipalities shall be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statements. The policy is also integrated with the Ontario Heritage Act. This piece of legislation grants municipalities powers to preserve locally significant cultural heritage resources through heritage designation. Decisions as to whether a property should be designated heritage or not is based solely on its inherent cultural heritage value or interest. City Council prefers to designate heritage properties with the support of property owners. However, Council will designate a property proactively, without the concurrence of a property owner as required. These principles are reflected in Brampton s Official Plan. The relevant policies are as follows: 4.9.1.3: All significant heritage resources shall be designated as being of cultural heritage value or interest in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act to help ensure effective protection and their continuing maintenance, conservation and restoration. 4.9.1.5: Priority will be given to designating all heritage cemeteries and all Class A heritage resources in the Cultural Heritage Resources Register under the Ontario Heritage Act. 4.9.1.6: The City will give immediate consideration to the designation of any heritage resource under the Ontario Heritage Act if that resource is threatened with demolition, significant alterations or other potentially adverse impacts. These principles are also guided by recognized best practices in the field of heritage conservation in Ontario and in Brampton s Heritage Program. Council Resolution HB054-2005: The following recommendation from the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of April 19, 2005 was approved by Planning, Design and Development Committee on May 2, 2005 and by Counil on May 9, 2005: that the development of a proactive strategy to ensure heritage designation of all Category A heritage resources be endorsed. 5.0 ALTERATION HISTORY AND HERITAGE INTEGRITY NOTE: 5.1 Recommended Restoration Measures: The following recommendations for future restoration and conservation are included for information purposes only. They are provided for the benefit of present and future property owners. These recommendations are non-binding. Property owners are under no obligation to restore any lost or missing attributes or features:

L 3-7 7 Repairs are required for the stone and rubble foundation that is leaking on the north and west sides Stucco finish requires repairs Roof requires replacement 6.0 HERITAGE EASEMENT None. 7.0 RARITY NOTE: Relatively few examples of Carpenter s Gothic cottages remain due to the fragile character of the style s decoration, and the frame structure s need for constant upkeep. 10.0 NOTE ON ARCHAEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL: None. 11.0 EXCLUSIONS: There are no exclusions to the scope of designation. The reasons for designation apply generally to all exterior elevations, facades, foundation, roof and roof trim, all entrances, windows, structural openings and associated trim, all architectural detailing, construction materials of wood, stone, brick, plaster parging, metal and glazing, their related building techniques, all interior spaces detailing and finishes, along with all contextual and landscaping features as cited. The following features and attributes are specifically excluded from the scope of heritage designation. The designating by-law does not apply to the following: 12.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Assessment Roll, Brampton, Peel County, North Ward, 1893. Brampton Insurance Plan. Toronto, Montreal: Underwriter s Survey Bureau, Limited. August 1931; revised November 1940, Plate 8. Bristow & Fitzgerald Surveyors. Plan of Town of Brampton in the County of Peel. Brampton: January 1857. Census Return, Brampton, Peel County, 1891 [A-2, p.13]; 1901 [A-2, p.6]. Collector s Rolls, Brampton, Peel County, North Ward, 1887, 1888, 1895.

L 3-8 8 Land Records, Peel Region Registry Office Abstract Index, Plan BR-2, Lots 103, 104, 43R 1399 Part 1, Brampton. Lynch, John. Directory of the County of Peel for 1873-4. Brampton: Brampton Progress, 1874, reprinted 1998. Might s 1964 Toronto West & North-west Suburban Dictionary. Toronto: Might Directories Limited, 1964. Mikel, Robert. Ontario House Styles: The Distinctive Architecture of the Province s 18 th and 19 th Century Homes. Toronto: James Lorimer & Company Ltd., 2004

L 3-9 9 13.0 LOCATION MAPS: 62 Union Street 62 Union Street

L 3-10 10 62 Union Street

L 3-11 11 14.0 IMAGES: Figure 1: Sketch of 62 Union Street Figure 2: Front facade

L 3-12 12 Figure 3: Left side view Figure 4: Right side view

L 3-13 13 Figure 5: Windows on the side elevation with shaped heads Figure 6: Open verandah

L 3-14 14 Figure 7: Front centre gable, and bell cast roof Figure 8: Front lawn

L 3-15 15 Figure 9: Modern addition to rear Figure 10: Union Street facing north

L 3-16 16 Figure 11: Union Street facing south Figure 12: View of 62 Union Street from Central Public School (formerly Central Grammar School)