Peach Rootstock Trials Jim Schupp PSU-FREC

Similar documents
Evaluation and Demonstration of New Stone Fruit Systems

2009 NC-140 Peach Rootstock Trial in Massachusetts

FRUIT CROP PEST UPDATES. Dr. Elina Coneva ACES, Auburn University

A REPORT TO THE CALIFORNIA TREE FRUIT AGREEMENT

NC-140 Peach, Apple and Cherry Rootstock Trials Update

Cling Peach ANNUAL REPORT 2006 EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR TOLERANCE TO BACTERIAL CANKER AND ORCHARD REPLANT CONDITIONS.

AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES. THE COLLEGE of NC-140. Peach & Apple Rootstock Trials. Ioannis S. Minas.

California Cling Peach Board ANNUAL REPORT-2010 IMPROVED ROOTSTOCKS FOR PEACH AND NECTARINE. Ted DeJong, Professor, University of California, Davis.

Bacterial Canker Susceptibility of Peach:Almond Hybrid Rootstocks for California Stonefruit Orchards

What to Consider: Almond Rootstocks. December 6, 2016

Rootstock Options for the southern Sac Valley. Kat Pope Orchard Advisor, Sac-Solano-Yolo Feb 3 rd, 2016

UPDATE ON CHERRY ROOTSTOCKS

Sweet Cherry Rootstock Traits Lynn E. Long, Oregon State University

Development of nematode/rootstock profiles for 40 rootstocks with the potential to be an alternative to Nemaguard

EVALUATION OF SIZE CONTROLLING ROOTSTOCKS FOR CALIFORNIA PEACH, PLUM AND NECTARINE PRODUCTION

Apple Rootstocks. John Cline, University of Guelph, Horticultural Experiment Station, Simcoe

Grower Summary TF 172. Evaluation and development of new rootstocks for apples, pears, cherries and plums. Final 2012

SACRAMENTO VALLEY REGIONAL ALMOND NEWSLETTER IN THIS ISSUE:

Accomplishments Report, 2015 NC 140 Project. Impact Nuggets. New Facilities and Equipment. Unique Project Related Findings

UC Agriculture & Natural Resources California Agriculture

Pruning Fruit Trees. Vince Urbina Colorado State Forest Service

New Cherry Training Systems Show Promise Lynn E. Long, Extension Horticulturist Oregon State University Extension Service/Wasco County

COMMON ERRORS IN ORCHARD SET UP. Room December

The Italian Plum Rootstock Trial: Results for Sicilian Environmental Conditions

ANNUAL REPORT TO NC DWARF APPLE ROOTSTOCK TRIAL SUMMARY FOR THE 2010 SEASON

Developing and Optimizing Sweet Cherry Training Systems for Efficiency and High Quality Fruit Part 1. Gregory Lang Michigan State University

LOW TEMPERATURE SURVIVAL OF REDHAVEN PEACH FLORAL BUDS ON SELECTED ROOTSTOCKS. A Thesis. Presented to. The Faculty of the Graduate School

The influence of different cherry rootstocks on sweet cherry properties

EVALUATION RESULTS OF FINNISH APPLE ROOTSTOCKS IN LATVIA

University of California Cooperative Extension Butte County

STONE FRUIT ROOTSTOCKS

3. M9 NIC29 A virus-free Belgian subclone of M9 that is slightly more vigorous than most others M9 clones.

Evaluation of new low- and moderate-chill peach cultivars in coastal southern California

Integration of Tree Spacing, Pruning and Rootstock Selection for Efficient Almond Production

East Malling Rootstock Club Policy Group meeting 15th September 2017

Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station

Unit D: Fruit and Vegetable Crop Production. Lesson 4: Growing and Maintaining Tree Fruits

Apple Rootstock Trials in British Columbia, Canada

Evaluation of grafting for the mature green tomato production system

Pruning Stone Fruit. Open Vase and Modified Open Vase Pruning

Experiences with different cherry rootstocks in Belgium. J. Vercammen Proeftuin pit- en steenfruit (pps)

FRUIT TREES Selection and Site Preparation. Gary Gorremans WSU Lewis County Master Gardener

Innovative Rootstocks for Apple crop. Nicola Dallabetta FEM (Italy) Australia November 2017

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF AMELANCHIER SP. AND QUINCE ELINE AS ROOTSTOCKS ON 1- TO 2-YEAR-OLD EUROPEAN PEAR TREES

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums 1

Dried Plum News Tulare County

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums 1

Application 2015 ESS Award for Excellence in Multistate Research Nominating Region: Nominator:

Effect of Orchard Management Practices on Peach Tree Growth, Yield, and Soil Ecology

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums 1

East Malling Rootstock Club. Felicidad Fernández AHDB Tree Fruit Day 22 Feb 2018

Cherry COST Action FA 1104 Training school «Rootstocks and training systems» Cherry rootstocks. Sara Pinczon du Sel, La Tapy Gérard Charlot, Ctifl

Rootstocks for Florida Stone Fruit 1

Why Grow Fruit or Berries in Your Backyard?

Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station

Apple I. Tuesday afternoon 2:00 pm

Update on new cherry rootstock possibilities from Michigan State Univ. Amy Iezzoni Department of Horticulture Michigan State University

Home Orchard Care for Master Gardeners. Jeff Schalau Associate Agent, ANR University of Arizona Cooperative Extension, Yavapai County

GROWTH AND PERFORMANCE OF OWN-ROOTED CHANDLER AND VINA COMPARED TO PARADOX ROOTED TREES

Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Research Service Washington, D.C

Grafting Fruit Trees. Loyd Collett 4/5/2011 1

Rootstock breeding and trialling at EMR. Feli Fernández

TRAINING AND PRUNING FRUIT PLANTS. Elizabeth Wahle (with contributions from Sonja Lallemand) February 2015 GROWING A NEW GENERATION

Tim Smith; Dana Faubion and Dr. William Proebsting,

Training Young Walnut Trees

EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR PISTACHIO PRODUCTION

Cherry rootstock on-going breeding program throughout the world

Louise Ferguson, Extension Pomologist, University of California, Davis at Kearney Agricultural Center

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums1

Unit E: Fruit and Nut Production. Lesson 3: Growing Apples

Integration of Tree Spacing, Rootstock Selection & Pruning for Efficient Almond Production

MICHIGAN PEACH SPONSOR NEWS

APR C:CEIVED. Objectives: Results : Project No : 94-PBB. Project Leader: PATRICK H. BROWN

ADVANCED TECHNIQUES FOR SMALL ORCHARDS. University of California 2011 Master Gardener Conference. Herb Machleder

Managing Orchard Salinity During and After Drought. December 9, 2015

CS Walsh, JM Harshman, M Newell, A Wallis, GR Welsh and A Barton-Williams. University of Maryland College Park, MD USA

Managing Cold Damaged Fruit Trees

Development of Early Blight and Late Blight Resistant Tomatoes. Report of a research supported by:

Effect of Rootstocks on Growth and Yield of Carmen Sweet Cherry

Peaches. Plums & Apricots. Pears. Cherries. Apples. Poor hardiness Try Contender or Reliance or seedling? Little or no pruning and spraying!

Grafting of Tomatoes for Soil-based Production in Greenhouse and High Tunnels Judson Reid, Kathryn Klotzbach and Nelson Hoover

Deciduous Fruit Trees Fall & Winter Care

2/18/2009. Do you have: Time Space Expertise Realistic expectations. Teryl R. Roper Dept. of Horticulture University of Wisconsin-Madison

Mini Apple Orchard Systems Trial: A Comparison of Central-leader, Vertical-axis, and Tall-spindle Apple Orchard Systems on Three Different Rootstocks

FINAL PROJECT REPORT Project title Organization Contact Administrator CO-PI Cooperators Introduction Objectives

Tree Fruit Bacterial Disease Management 2.0: Going Beyond Antibiotics

Canopy Management Strategies

Pistachio rootstocks. Elizabeth J. Fichtner Farm Advisor: nuts, prunes, olives UCCE Tulare and Kings Counties

Peach Genetics and Breeding for the Future.

Small volume : Spanish bush, KGB, drilling

Ion Duţu, Crăişor Mazilu, Ancu Sergiu. Abstract

Reverse Poster Pruning fruit trees. 2. Thinning fruit trees. 3. Effective fruit tree watering and feeding. 4. Pest and disease control

Developing Improved Strategies for Management of Replant Problems

Plant Propagation PLS 3223/5222

PRUNING DECIDUOUS FRUIT TREES by Tom Del Hotal

TUNNEL TOMATOES AT CROSSROAD FARM

Sweet cherry rootstocks

Training & Pruning Fruit Trees AG-29

ISHS International Cherry Symposium 2013

Transcription:

Peach Rootstock Trials Jim Schupp PSU-FREC

System Components Genetic Variety Rootstock Tree arrangement Tree spacing Training Pruning

Missing Key: Dwarfing Rootstock High survival Winter hardy Well adapted / tolerant Graft compatible Productive / yield efficient Large fruit size Tree size control Free from weaknesses Rootsuckers Poor anchorage Disease / nematode susceptibility

Missing Key: Dwarfing Rootstock Dwarfing stocks remain a long-term goal To-date, many are interspecific hybrids When size control is achieved: Tree often appears stressed (incompatibility) Fewer and/or small fruit No increase in biological efficiency Survival issues

2008 Peach Rootstock Trial Johnboy on 9 rootstocks Commercial standard = Bailey FREC Biglerville: Open Vase PSU Rock Springs: in-row V Two commercial grower locations 1 open vase, 1 perpendicular V

2008 Rootstocks at FREC Rootstock TCSA % Bailey Cumul. Yield (lb) Yield Effic. Mort. (%) Krymsk 2 72 45 130 0.82 50 Krymsk 1 91 57 216 1.07 70 Controller 5 131 82 243 0.84 10 Ishtara 138 87 278 0.91 70 Bailey 159 100 401 1.14 10 Atlas 185 116 328 0.80 20 Controller 9 192 121 309 0.73 10 Empyrean 2 195 123 282 0.66 20 Viking 214 135 342 0.72 30

2008 Rootstocks Yield > 2.75 inches Rootstock 2011 2012 2013 2014 Krymsk 2 1 18 3 15 Krymsk 1 12 49 27 28 Controller 5 6 30 58 56 Ishtara 14 60 40 62 Bailey 7 79 71 86 Atlas 13 67 65 73 Controller 9 14 51 70 80 Empyrean 2 12 52 52 55 Viking 10 60 71 62

2008 Lory Planting Survival 78% 86% All others: 100% survival

Schatzer Farm Planting Survival 14% 88 88 88 All others: 100% Survival

2008 Plantings The winner is Bailey! High yield, YE, Yield of large fruit Low mortality Slight degree of tree size control

2009 NC-140 Peach Trial Redhaven on 17 rootstocks Commercial standard = Lovell Trained to open vase system Supplemental irrigation during final swell

2009 NC-140 Full Sized Rootstocks Rootstock TCSA % Lovell Cumul. Yield (lb) Yield Effic. Mort. (%) Guardian 138 95 175 0.58 0 KV 10127 143 99 176 0.56 0 Bright s Hybrid#5 144 99 176 0.56 13 Lovell 145 100 198 0.62 0 Krymsk 86 153 106 175 0.52 0 Atlas 160 111 203 0.59 13 Viking 163 113 203 0.57 25

NC-140 Vigorous Rootstocks Average Fruit Size (g) Rootstock 2011 2012 2013 2014 Guardian 150 212 176 191 KV 10127 148 163 165 189 Bright s Hybrid#5 148 185 171 194 Lovell 145 176 161 182 Krymsk 86 147 183 185 199 Atlas 152 196 170 204 Viking 145 182 180 192 Guardian 150 212 176 191

2009 NC-140 Full Sized Rootstocks 6 rootstocks were similar size to Lovell Similar yield and yield efficiency Good survival, except Viking (75%)

Guardian Developed to tolerate PTSL in South Tree size 95% of Lovell Survival in PA is 100% Preliminary verdict: Interchangeable with other std size stocks

2009 NC-140 Size-controlling Rootstocks Rootstock TCSA % Lovell Cumul. Yield (lb) Yield Effic. Mort. (%) Krymsk 1 63 44 94 0.68 50 P. americana 87 60 152 0.80 0 Controller 5 90 62 135 0.68 0 Fortuna 99 68 139 0.66 38 HBOK 10 101 70 190 0.88 0 Empyrean 2 111 76 134 0.56 13 HBOK 32 115 79 168 0.66 13 Mirobac 120 83 166 0.62 0 KV 10123 127 88 200 0.70 0

NC-140 Size Controlling Rootstocks Average fruit size (g) Rootstock 2011 2012 2013 2014 Krymsk 1 146 180 181 177 P. americana 150 199 173 178 Controller 5 151 190 182 180 Fortuna 139 209 158 164 HBOK 10 151 196 160 174 Empyrean 2 147 181 163 165 HBOK 32 145 179 148 169 Mirobac 148 182 175 178 KV 10123 159 195 157 179

Percentage of total harvest, by weight 2011 Harvest Timing 100% 80% 60% 3rd Pick 2nd Pick 1st Pick 40% 20% 0%

Yield per tree (kg) 2011 Fruit Size 10 8 6 4 >3" 2.75-3" 2.5-2.75" 2-2.25" 2.25-2.5" 1.75-2" <2" 2 0

2009 NC-140 Size-controlling Rootstocks Nine stocks give some tree size control One (Controller 5) is discontinued anchorage Two (Krymsk 1 & Fortuna) have unacceptably high mortality In PA and in other NC-140 plantings

Prunus americana American Plum Among the most dwarfing: Tree size 60% that of Lovell Precocious High yield efficiency (2 nd to HBOK 10) Suckering is excessive

Prunus americana

HBOK 10 Controller 8 Harrow Blood x Okinawa cross P. persica cross from UC Davis A small semi-dwarf: 70% Lovell High cumulative yield Similar yield to trees on standard rootstocks Yield efficiency (1 st ) Precocious Mortality = 0

HBOK 10 Controller 8

HBOK 32 - Controller 7 Another P. persica from UC Davis Tree size 79% that of Lovell Precocious Good cumulative yield and average yield efficiency

HBOK 32 Controller 7

KV 10123 Largest of the semi-dwarfs 88% size of Lovell Precocious High yielding P. persica cross from R. Scorza s breeding program at USDA, Kearneysville, WV

KV 10123

Cumulative Mortality in Biglerville, 2014 Rootstock Year of Planting Mortality (%) Fortuna 2009 38 Ishtara 2008 70 Krymsk 1 2008 & 2009 50 & 50 Krymsk 2 2008 40 Imperial California 2009 100 Viking 2008 & 2009 30 & 25

Tree Mortality Most trees died within 1 year of planting Cause: Winter injury Exceptions: Viking: a few over last 3 years Ishtara: some early and some later! Cause: winter injury + cytospora canker

Conclusions Several promising new rootstocks with a range of tree size control Good survival, productivity and free of flaws Some are P. persica (HBOK 10 & 32, KV 10123, Guardian): less risk of incompatibility Reason for some optimism that we may soon have the missing key!

Thanks For Your Support! Pennsylvania Peach & Nectarine Board SHAP Research Committee