AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION MID-BEDFORDSHIRE DISTRICT LOCAL FLAN

Similar documents
AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS LAND NEAR SHIRE HILL FARM SAFFRON WALDEN ESSEX

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS BIRCH PIT, NEAR COLCHESTER ESSEX

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS TYTTENHANGER QUARRY EXTENSION, LONDON COLNEY, HERTFORDSHIRE

HINCKLEY AND BOSWORTH LOCAL PLAN Land south of Earl Shilton - Site G Agricultural Land Classification February 1997

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION SEMI-DETAILED SURVEY EGG FARM KINGS LANGLEY HERTFORDSHIRE

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS EXTENSION TO CLOUD HILL QUARRY, BREEDON ON THE HILL, LEICESTERSHIRE

MAFF Ministry of iflmll Agriculture Fisheries and Food

If A rr Ministry of. IfiriEI. Agriculture Fisheries and Food

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OLDWICK FARM, WEST LAVANT, WEST SUSSEX

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION GREAT GRIMSBY LOCAL PLAN SITE AG 2. GREAT COATES AUGUST 1993

Oaklands College, St. Albans, Hertfordshire. Agricultural Land Classification & Soil Physical Characteristics Report.

LAND NORTH OF TAMWORTH. Agricultural Land Classification ALC Map and Report April 1998

FROGS HALL FARM, TAKELEY, ESSEX. Agricultural Land Classification Report & Statement of Soil Physical Characteristics. May 1999

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION VULCAN VILLAGE (PROPOSED GOLF COURSE) ST HELENS MBC

Agricultural Land Classification and Statement of Physical Characteristics Higbfield Farm Whitley Bridge North Yorkshire October 1996

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS REPORT INCORPORATING AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS REPORT INCORPORATING AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION LAND AT BOLE INGS, WESTBURTON, NOTTINGHAMSHIRE (SK805875)

STAFFORDSHIRE AND STOKE-ON- TRENT STRUCTURE PLAN Site 7: Priory Farm. Agricultural Land Classification ALC Map and Report November 1998

MAFF I^inistry of IfiriEE Agriculture Fisheries and Food

HARRINGTON CEMENT WORKS, HASLINGFIELD ROAD, HARRINGTON, CAMBS. Agricultural Land Classification ALC Map and Soil Physical Characteristics Report

CAVIL HEAD OCCS ACKLINGTON NOVEMBER 1997

MAFF Ministry of Ifinil Agriculture Rsheries and Food

ACRE NOOK EAST QUARRY, CHELFORD, CHESHIRE. Statement of Site Physical Characteristics January 1998

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION LEEDS AND LANGLEY BY-PASS, KENT

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS. DERBYSHIRE MINERALS PLAN - EGGINTON (Shes A and B)

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION WITTON PARK, COUNTY DURHAM PROPOSED QUARRY EXTENSION DECEMBER 1992

CORNFORTH EAST QUARRY COUNTY DURHAM

ADy^S. Whelpley Farm, Whiteparish, Wiltshire. Resource Plaiming Team Taunton Statutory Unit. November 93

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

M AFT Ministry of Ifin&l. Agriculture Rsheries and Food

PROPOSED OPEN CAST COAL SITE SEPTEMBER 1992

PHYSICAL CHAtlACTERISTICS REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SAND AND GRAVEL SITE AT MANOR FARM, UFFINGTON

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION FAVERSHAM LOCAL PLAN

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION REPORT LAND AT BRANT FARM, STOURPORT-ON-SEVERN

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION KNOWSLEY UDP, SITE 45.01

SUMMARY. alcholnie.doc\ih\jk

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

NORTH DEVON LOCAL PLAN: BARNSTAPLE AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION. Report of Survey 1. SUMMARY

MAFF Ministry of Ifini.! Agriculture Fisheries and Food. (.L,^ fu Ai-c lot^sr

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

SOILS AND AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND OFF HOLT ROAD, ROSSETT. Report 1067/1

AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND NEAR MINDALE HOUSE PRESTATYN. Report 762/1

HUMBLEBURN OCCS, CRAGHEAD, COUNTY DURHAM SURVEY OF RESTORED LAND OCTOBER RPT Job Number: 73/97 MAFF Reference: EL LURET Job Number: ME3RTP

The entire site supports grass on which sheep had been grazing recently.

P/2014/00830 Received 27/06/2014 SOIL RESOURCES AND AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND AT ROLLESTON PARK FARM TUTBURY, STAFFORDSHIRE.

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

SOIL RESOURCES REPORT HALVERGATE MARSHES, NORFOLK 1. BACKGROUND

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 8. Sobig

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL ASSESSMENT

Grade. % of Survey Area 1. Staplehay. 2 3a. 3a 3b Non Ag Organ Ag Bldgs. 1 Non Ag Urban

Wooodside Lane-Kings Stanley. Agricultural Land Classification. September RPT Job Number; ^/98

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No Waiau

WHITWELL QUARRY, DERBYSHIRE

2014 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

SOIL SURVEY OF PORTIONS 81 AND 82 OFTHE FARM VAALBANK 512JQ, NEAR MAGALIESBURG, SOUTH-WEST OF PRETORIA

Land Capability Classifications

Iowa FFA Soil Career Development Event 2008

CB1 Moderately undulating landscape with slight gilgai (few inches) formation: broad ridge tops and upper slopes of moderately shallow grey cracking

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 11. Pukemutu

HAVANT BOROUGH LOCAL PLAN Site 43 Land at Manor Road, Hayling Island, Hampshire. Agricultural Land Classification ALC Map and Summary Report

2012 FINAL SOILS AREA 2 Envirothon Questions Answer KEY

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 76. Mossburn

Report on a soil survey and agricultural suitability investigation of the property known as Erf 660, De Doorns.

IOWA FFA STATE SOILS CDE SATURDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2007 AMES, IOWA

STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MISSOURI ASSESSOR MANUAL

2016 Iowa FFA Soils Evaluation CDE Exam

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 23. Waikiwi

ADAS rooo TARM NG LANO & LE SURC. West Dorset Local Plan Objector Sites. Agricultural Land Classification

Categorizing European soils according to their ability to retain or transmit diffuse source pollutants

Soil characteristics that influence nitrogen and water management

3.44b. Soil Classification AK & BR

DO YOU KNOW YOUR SOILS? (Rev. 10/11)

Unit II Soil Management

Using Land Capability Classifications

2018 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam 1. Landscape positions characterizes the location of the soil on the landscape and identifies potential risks.

Girtridge Monitor Farm Meeting

Pits 1 & 3 Questions. 7. Subsurface: Texture (5 pts) A. Coarse B. Moderately course C. Medium D. Fine E. Very Fine

Soil resources in upper Basho Valley.

Team number Page 1 of Canon Envirothon Soils Station Test. Soils and Climate Change

27/01/2017. This event is being run by SAC Consulting. What is Soil?

Tools to facilitate the use of Soil Maps in Emilia-Romagna region (Italy) Paola Tarocco

Soil Geography Notes JC-Learn. JC-Learn. Geography Notes Soil. 1 P a g e

SCOPING REPORT. On contract research for ILISO CONSULTING

Soil Horizons cont. Oa- highly decomposed Oi-undecomposed

2017 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam

Examining soils in the field. Examining soils in the field. Environment Agency thinksoils examining soils in the field

September 20, 2016 Soils Investigation for Agricultural Designation Windemere Place, Missoula County, Montana

c?3a2-t)a3-<s^ BUCKINGHAMSHIRE MINERALS PLAN REVIEW LAND AT DENHAM MAFF Ministryof lfuu& Agriculture Fisheries and Food

York Potash Project Mine, MTS and MHF Environmental Statement, Part 2 Chapter: 16 Land Use and Soils Appendix 16.5 Outline Soil Management Plan

Report on the soil evaluation at Harakeke 2015 Ltd Properties, Tasman District, Nelson

EDULABZ. Ans. (b) 7. The soft, porous layer with a good water-retaining capacity forms the

MONITORING REPORT: No. 283

Quakers Walk Devizes. Agricultural Land Classification. March Resource Planning Team Job Number 18/99 Bristol


Soil Maps for Production Agriculture. Jarrod O. Miller, Extension Agronomist

SOIL SURVEY FOR PROPOSED WET ASH DISPOSAL FACILITY, HENDRINA POWER STATION, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE

EXAMPLE Point A: Sandy Loam: 65% Sand _ 20% Silt _ 15% Clay. Point B: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point C: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point D: %Sand % Silt % Clay

Transcription:

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION MID-BEDFORDSHIRE DISTRICT LOCAL FLAN

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION MID-BEDFORDSHIRE DISTRICT LOCAL PLAN 10 BACKGROUND 1.1 ADAS Statutory Group were requested on behalf of MAFF to assess the agricultural land quality of five sites which are currently mcluded in the area of search for the Mid Bedfordshire District Local Plan. The five sites, which extend to 94 hectares in total, were surveyed in March 1995. They are known as; land east of Biggleswade (4) (north and south), land at Home Farm, Cranfield (7), land east of Marston Moretaine (14) and land south of Stotfold (24). 1.2 On the pubushed Provisional 1:63 360 scale Agricultural Land Classification Map, sheet number 147 (MAFF, 1969) the areas are mauily shown as grades 2 and 3. Site 24 is entirely grade 2, as is site 4 (north). Site 4 (south) is shown as having a small area of grade 2 land in the north with the remaining land as grade 3. Site 7 is depicted as entirely grade 3. Site 14 was mapped as non-agricultural land. Since this map is ofa reconnaissance nature designed primarily for strategic planning purposes, the current survey was undertaken to provide more detailed information on land quality within the areas of search. 2 0 PHYSICAL FACTORS AFFECTING LAND QUALITY Climate 2.1 Site specific climatic information for the sue sites has been obtained by mterpolating data contained m the 5 km grid cumatological dataset for Agricultural Land Classification produced by the Meteorological Office (1989). This information is shown in summary overleaf.

SITES Annual Average Rainfall (mm) Accumulated Temperature ( C) Altitude Field Capacity Days MD Wheat (mm) MD Potatoes (mm) 4 (north) 550 1443 32 94 121 117 4 (south) 551 1440 35 94 120 116 7 14 24 599 582 570 1360 1445 1426 112 36 51 116 108 105 108 118 119 100 114 113 2.2 These characteristics do not impose any overall climatic Umitation to land quality at the sites. However, climatic factors specifically field capacity days and sou moisture deficits do interact with sou factors to mfluence soil wetness and droughtiness limitations. At this locality the climate is relatively dry in regional terms. Altitude and Relief 2.3 The sites are widely spaced throughout the Mid Bedfordshire District, occupying gently undulating land, with maximum gradients of 4. The sites range in heightfi*om30 to 112 m AOD with site 7 occupying the highest land. 2.4 Neither gradient or altitude constitute limitations to agricultural land quality. Geology and Soils 2.5 The pubushed drift edition geology maps of varying scales which cover these sites (1:50 000 scale, sheet 204, 1976; 1:253 440 scale, sheet 16, 1907; 1:625 000 scale Quaternary Map of the United Kingdom South) show that large areas are covered by a variety of drift deposits; River terrace gravels occur at sites 4 (north) and 14 which both Ue adjacent to river tributaries. Boulder clay and morainic drift is present at site 7 and in the northeast of site 4 (south), the remainder of site 4 (south) being covered by glacial gravel. At site 24 the Upper Cretaceous Chalk which runs south of Bedford in a southwest to northeast ridge is exposed.

2.6 The SoU Survey of England and Wales have mapped this area at a scale of 1:63 360 (sheet 147, 1968) and this map indicates the occurrence of 5 sou associations within the Local Plan Area. 2.7 The most extensive association is the MUton Association which generauy occurs in conjunction with gravel deposits. This is mapped over the whole of site 14, the majority of site 24 and in the east of site 4 (south). Overlying the river terrace gravels at site 4 (north) are sous of the Biggleswade Association. Other sous present within the survey area include the Cottenham Association which occurs over the majority of site 4 (south) in conjunction with the glacial gravel. The Burwell Association is mapped in a small area of land adjacent to the stream in the south of site 24. The Hanslope Association covers the boulder clay deposits at site 7. 3 0 AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION 3.1 The fouowing table provides a breakdown of the ALC grades identified on all five sites in hectares and percentage terms. A definition of the ALC grades is contained in Appendbc 1. Table 1 : Distribution of ALC grades Site 4(N) 4(S) 7 14 24 ALC 1 7.84 2 3.83 7.15 16.56 3a 9.54 1.67 16.7 22.75 3b 5.02 4 Non 2.67 Agric TOTAL 13.37 16.66 16^7 30.44 16.56 3.2 A detailed description of the sous and ALC grades identified on each site in tum is provided overleaf:

4 0 SITE 4 (NORTH) BIGGLESWADE SoUs 4.1 One main soil type was identified which broadly corresponded with the mapped Biggleswade Soil Association. Typical profiles arefi"eedraming (wetness class I) and comprise very sughtly stony non calcareous medium sandy loam topsoils over very slightly stony medium sandy loam or occasionally sandy clay loam upper subsoils. Lower subsous which occur at variable depth comprise sughtly stony medium sand or loamy medium sand which typically overue slightly or moderately stony medium sand at depth. In the south eastem part of the site an undulating band of stony gravel (35-38% stone by volume) was noted between 65-90 cms depth. Agricultural Land Classification 4.2 The site is graded predominantly 3a, with smauer areas of 2. A breakdown of ALC grades in hectares and percentage terms is provided below. Grade 2 3a TOTAL ha 3.83 9.54 13.37 % 28.7 71.3 100.00 Grade 2 4.3 CJrade 2 land is mapped in the central and northeastem part of the site coinciduig with the deeper, better bodied and more water retentive varients. Althoughfi-eedraining, these sous have a restricted available water capacity due to the presence of Ught textured sand at depth in the profile, and the land is consequently restricted to grade 2 by minor droughtiness constraints.

Subgrade 3a 4.4 The remainder o the site is mapped as subgrade 3a, profiles in this area have a reduced depth of loamy materials overlying the sand which is often slightly or moderately stony. The available water capacity of these sous is correspondingly reduced and the land is restricted to 3 a by moderate droughtiness unperfectioiis. 4.5 Although individual profiles of lighter textured sous are or approach grade 3b on the southwestern edge of the site, these have not been deuneated separately. 5 0 SITE 4 (SOUTH) BIGGLESWADE Soils 5.1 Two main sou types were identified on this site which broadly correspond with the mapped Milton and Cottenham Soil Associations. The first, located in the westem and central part of the site comprises very slightly stony non calcareous medium sandy loam or medium clay loam topsoil, over very sughtly stony sandy clay loam upper subsoils which typicauy become lighter textured with depth. These soils arefi-eedraining and are assessed as wetness class I. 5.2 The second sou type is on the eastem boundary and comprises very slightly stony, non calcareous sandy clay loam topsou over very slightly stony sandy clay loam upper subsoil. This overlies slightly stony sandy clay becoming moderately stony below depths of 55-80 cm. These sous were assessed as wetness class Il/in dependant on depth to slowly permeable clay and/or groundwater. Agricultural Land Classification 5.3 Land on this site has been graded 1, 2 and 3 a. Land quauty to the south of the track has been assessed on the basis of agricultural potential in an irrigated state, since irrigationfi-oman adequate and assured water supply is currently practised within this area. A breakdown of land quality in hectares and percentage terms is provided below.

Grade 1 2 3a TOTAL ha 7.84 7.15 1.67 16.66 % 47.0 43.0 10.0 100.00 Grade I 5.4 This occurs to the south of the track in the westem and central parts of the site corresponding with the fine loamy and coarse loamy soils described in paragraph 5.1. SoUs are assessed as wetness class I and with the benefit of irrigation water this land has very few limitations to agricultural use. Grade 2 This occurs in 2 main situations: 5.5 In the eastem part of the site south of the track, grade 2 land is mapped in areas of fine loamy soils overlying gravelly clay which are morefiiuydescribed in paragraph 5.2. Land of this type is usually assessed as slightly to moderately droughty, but due to the availability of Urigation, a substantial part of the droughtiness Umitation is alleviated and the land is consequently graded 2. Individual profiles are also limited by tninor wmter wetness and workabiuty imperfections. 5.6 The second main area of grade 2 occurs to the north of the track in the westem and central parts of the site, coinciding with the Ughter textured sou varient described in paragraph 5.1. These sous are fi'ee drairung (wetness class I) but are restricted to grade 2 by minor summer droughtiness constraints which resultfi^omthe presence of loamy sand and sand textures within the lower subsou.

Subgrade 3a 5.7 This occurs in the eastem part of the site north of the track corresponding with the fine loamy over stony clayey sous described in paragraph 5.2. Land of this type is restricted to 3a by sught to moderate droughtiness imperfections. 6 0 SITE 7 CRANFIELD Soils 6.1 SoUs on this site are derivedfi-om the underlying boulder clay drift and comprise very sughtly stony, calcareous clay or very occasionauy heavy clay loam topsoil over very sughtly stony, calcareous, clay upper subsou to a depth of 50/55 cm. At this depth very slightly/slightly stony strongly mottled chalky boulder clay was encountered and continued to 120 cm+ depth. In most areas borings were distinctly mottled and slowly permeable at relatively shallow depth and were assessed as wetness class m. Individual borings of better drained sous in the north of the site were assessed as wetness class n. Agricultural Land Classification Subgrade 3a 6.2 This 16.7 hectare site is graded entirely 3a. Although imperfectly drained (wetness class ni) these naturauy calcareous sous tend to be better stmctured and more easily worked than their non calcareous counterparts and the land is therefore eligible for subgrade 3a. Although mdividual profiles of better drained sous in the north of the site are or approach grade 2, they have not been deuneated separately. The land is Umited by sught to moderate winter wetness and workabuity imperfections.

7 0 SITE 14 EAST OF MARSTON MORETAINE Soils Two main soil types were found on the site. 7.1 The majority of the site broadly corresponds with the mapped Milton association and mainly comprises very slightly stony non calcareous heavy clay loam (occasionally medium clay loam or clay) topsous, over similar or heavier upper subsoils. Lower subsous which typically occur between 60-100 cm depth, comprise very slightly stony calcareous dense clay which is slowly permeable. Often occurring immediately above the dense clay is a narrow horizon of moderately stony sandy clay loam which becomes lighter textured with depth. At the tune of survey these sandy horizons were frequently saturated. Drainage status is assessed mainly as wetness class II. 7.2 The second sou type occurs in small areas in the south and east of the site and in the fields adjacent to Bedford Road. SoUs typically comprise very slightly stony non calcareous heavy clay loam or clay topsous over very sughtly stony non calcareous clay. Lower subsous which typically occur between 40-55 cm depth comprise very slightly stony calcareous dense grey clay which is slowly permeable. These profiles have been assessed as wetness class III. Agricultural Land Classification 7 3 The site is predominantly graded 3a, with smaller areas of 3b. A breakdown of ALC grades in hectares and percentage terms is provided below. Grade Subgrade 3 a Subgrade 3 b Non Agricultural TOTAL ha 22.75 5.02 2.67 30.44 % 74.7 16.5 8.8 100.0

Subgrade 3a I.A Subgrade 3a land is mapped extensively over the site corresponding with the better drained and slightly Ughter textured sou variants described in paragraph 7.1. Slowly permeable clay is typicauy present between 60/100 cm depth and the land is consequently assessed as wetness class II, or occasionauy, wetness class I. The combination of relatively heavy topsoil textures with slight dramage imperfections result in the land being restricted to 3 a by slight to moderate wetness and workabuity constraints. Although individual profiles of lighter textured sous occur towards the south of the site, that are or approach grade 2, these have not been delineated separately. Subgrade 3b 7.5 This is mapped in smau areas along the westem and eastem edges of the site, corresponding with the slightly heavier and more poorly drained soil variants described in paragraph 7.2. These sous are typicauy slowly permeable between 40-55 cm and are assessed as wetness class in. The combination of heavier topsou textures with imperfect soil drainage results in a more significant wetness and workability limitation and the land is consequently restricted to subgrade 3b. Non Agricultural 7.6 A narrow strip of non agricultural land is mapped in the north and westem part of the site which corresponds to a dyke and associated large earth embankment. 8.0 SITE 24 SOUTH OF STOTFOLD Soils Two main soil types were identified:

8.1 The first main sou type occurs on higher ground in the north of the site corresponding with the area mapped as the Milton Association on the published soil map. Profiles in this area are typicauy free draining (wetness class I) and comprise very sughtly stony sandy clay loam or occasionally medium clay loam topsous over sughtly stony sandy clay loam upper subsous. Upper subsous typicauy overue slightly stony sunilarly textured lower subsous except m a small area to the north of site, where lower subsous may be moderately stony (up to 20% flint). Clayey Chalk Marl is encountered below 70/80 cm on mid slopes. Coarser textured loamy medium sand lower subsous occur sporadically throughout this area. 8.2 The second main sou type occurs on lower ground in the south of the site where profiles are more clayey and correspond to those of the mapped BurweU Association which are derived from Chalk Marl. These soils are typically strongly calcareous and very slightly stony throughout, and comprise heavy clay loam or occasionally medium clay loam topsoils over heavy clay loam or occasionally clay upper subsous. Lower subsoils typically consist of gleyed silty clay or clay derived from the Chalk Marl parent material which is encountered at depths of between 70/80 cm. The clayey textured Chalk Marl is slowly permeable and wetness class is assessed as II or occasionally I. Agricultural Land Classification Grade 2 This 16.6 hectare site has been mapped as entirely grade 2. 8.3 Grade 2 land in the north of the site cortesponds to the sandy clay loam sous described in paragraph 8.1. These sous are weu drained (wetness class I) and hold moderately good reserves of available water for crop growth. Slight droughtiness Umitations exclude this land from grade 1. Although individual profiles with inferior drainage or, in the north of the site, stonier topsous approach grade 3a, these have not been deuneated separately.

8.4 In the south of the site grade 2 land is associated with the calcareous clayey sous derived from the Chalk Marl deposits (see paragraph 8.2). Due to their calcareous nature these sous are moderately well structured and relatively weu drained. Mottling, an indication of subsoil wetness, is usually present below 50/60 cm with a slowly permeable layer at 70/80 cm resultmg in a sou wetness class of II or occasionauy I. Since profiles are naturally calcareous all topsoil variants are eugible for grade II on workabiuty grounds and the land is Umited by minor wetness and workability Unperfections together with slight summer droughtiness constraints. March 1995 ADAS Ref 15/95 MAFF 5 EL/0294/1337 Resource Planning Team Huntingdon Statutory Group ADAS Cambridge

REFERENCES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ENGL/USfD AND WALES, 1907. Sheet 16, drift edition, scale 1:253 440. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF GREAT BRITAIN (ENGLAND AND WALES), 1976. Sheet 204, Biggleswade, drift edition, scale 1:50 000. INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1977. Quaternary Map of the United Kingdom South, first edition, scale 1:625 000. MAFF, 1969. Agricultural Land Classification Map (Provisional) Sheet 147, scale 1:63 360. MAFF, 1988. Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales (Revised GuideUnes and criteria for grading the quauty of Agricultural Land). Alnwick. METEOROLOGICAL OFFICE, 1989. Climatological data for Agricultural Land Classification. SOIL SURVEY OF ENGLAND AND WALES, 1968. Sheet 147, Bedford and Luton, scale 1:63 360.

Appendix 1 Grade 1 - excellent quality agricultural land Land with no or very minor limitations to agricultural use. A very wide range of agricultural and horticultural crops can be grown and commonly include top fiuit, soft fiiiit, salad crops and winter harvested vegetables. Yields are high and less variable than on land of lower quality. Grade 2 - very good quality agricultural land Land with minor limitations which affect crop yield, cultivations or harvesting. A wide range of agricultural and horticultural crops can usually be grown but on some land in the grade there may be reduced flexibility due to difficulties with the production of the more demanding crops such as winter harvested vegetables and arable crops. The level of yield is generauy high but may be lower or more variable than Grade 1. Grade 3 - good to moderate quality agricultural land Land with moderate limitations which affect the choice of crops, timing and type of cultivation, harvesting or the level of yield. Where more demanding crops are grown yields are generally lower or more variable than on land in Grades 1 and 2. Subgrade 3a - good quality agricultural land Land capable of consistentiy producing moderate to high yields ofa narrow range of arable crops, especiauy cereals, or moderate yields ofa wide range of crops including cereals, grass, oilseed rape, potatoes, sugar beet and the less demanding horticultural crops. Subgrade 3b - moderate quality agricultural land Land capable of producing moderate yields ofa narrow range of crops, principauy cereals and grass or lower yields ofa wider range of crops or high yields of grass which can be grazed or harvested over most of the year.

Grade 4 - poor quality agricultural land Land with severe Unutations which significantly restrict the range of crops and/or levels of yields. It is mainly suited to grass with occasional arable crops (eg. cereals and forage crops) the yield of which are variable. In most cumates, yields of grass may be moderate to high but there may be difficulties in utiusation. The grade also includes very droughty arable land. Grade 5 - very poor quality agricultural land Land with very severe limitations which restrict use to permanent pasture or rough grazing, except for occasional pioneer forage crops.