Appendix H Historic Resources Discipline Report. Draft Environmental Impact Statement Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk

Similar documents
Appendix G Public Services and Utilities Discipline Report. Draft Environmental Impact Statement Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk

Appendix K Vegetation and Wildlife Discipline Report. Draft Environmental Impact Statement Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk

APPENDIX C Discipline Report Errata Sheets. Final Environmental Impact Statement Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk

1.1 WATERFRONT SEATTLE

Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Final Environmental Impact Statement Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk

Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk Final EIS Appendix D - Supplemental Draft EIS Comments and Responses October 2016.

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

A. INTRODUCTION B. NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE

What s Up Next In The Seattle Squeeze. PSRC Transportation Policy Board April 11

Transportation. Strategies for Action

PROJECT SITE The Proposed Project includes the Allen and Pike Street malls between Delancey and South Streets (see Figure 2C-1).

WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION PROJECT. Addendum to the Visual and Aesthetic Impacts Technical Report

DRAFT SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION STILLWATER MUNICIPAL BARGE FACILITY

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

SDOT DPD. SDOT Director s Rule DPD Director s Rule DCLU DR SED DR of 7 CITY OF SEATTLE

WELCOME! 8 8:30 6: TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Open House. Presentation & Q&A

Right-of-Way Acquisitions and Relocations Technical Memorandum

2016 REVISIONS COMMENT FORM RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE PUBLIC WAY COMMENT PERIOD: JUNE 1 TO JUNE 30, 2015

4.1 LAND USE AND HOUSING

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

RESOLUTION NO. R Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension

COMPLETE GREEN STREET CHECKLIST

BALLARD TO DOWNTOWN SEATTLE

The transportation system in a community is an

7.5 Impacts on the Section 4(f) Properties

112th Avenue Light Rail Options Concept Design Report JUNE 2010 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY TBG PGH

Appendix E Section 4(f) Evaluation

DOWNTOWN REDMOND LINK EXTENSION SEPA Addendum to the East Link Project Final Environmental Impact Statement

3.8 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS

Purpose of Open House #3

Public Meeting #3 May 9, 2009 MVVA Team

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

East River Waterfront Esplanade and Piers New York, New York Draft Environmental Impact Statement

HEALTH SCIENCES BUILDING REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT

M i s s i o n B a y W a t e r f r o n t

APPENDIX D: Visual and Aesthetic Conditions for NCCU Station Refinement. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

Chapter 22. Alternatives to the Proposed Project

Study Area. Capitol Way. Greening America s Capitals 11/13/2014. A Greening America s Capitals Project

VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION

Description of Preferred Alternative

9IMPLEMENTATION AND PHASING

ROME WATERFRONT VILLAGE PROJECT NARRATIVE January 25, 2018

FDOT D4 Complete Streets

14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC

A. INTRODUCTION B. PROJECT LOCATION

ARGENTA TRAIL (CSAH 28/63) REALIGNMENT SOUTH PROJECT (CP 63-25)

The Illinois Department of Transportation and Lake County Division of Transportation. Route 173, including the Millburn Bypass

Preci nct P l ans Figure 56 Campus Aerial Photo, 2008 CAL STATE EAST BAY, HAYWARD CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS - OXBOW PARK ENTRANCE AND PUT-IN

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE TWO November 28, 2018

DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE

4.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES

IOWA HIGHWAY 57 / WEST 1 ST STREET STUDY PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL MEETING APRIL 22, 2014

Expo Line Transit Project. Project Status Update Meeting West End Corridor Segment C

5.4.6 Cumulative Operational Impacts

Town of Portola Valley General Plan. Nathhorst Triangle Area Plan

Rezoning Transportation Analysis Petition Number: General Location Identifier:

TOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION

SECOND AND UNIVERSITY SEATTLE, WASHINGTON

Shift Rapid Transit Public Participation Meeting May 3, 2017

Clairtrell Area Context Plan

SPRINGHILL LAKE TRANSIT VILLAGE

Early in the scoping process, several groups submitted a letter that reflected our collective values for Sound Transit 3. These values include:

Establish a network of streetscaped vehicle and pedestrian routes that connect within and outside the Plan area.

38 Queen s University Campus Master Plan Part 1

5.2 LAND USE AND ZONING

Town Center. Block 5 Existing multifamily residential units are expected to remain.

The West Vaughan Employment Area Secondary Plan Policies

Community Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU)

DRAFT SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION KOLLINER PARK

Mississippi Skyway Preliminary Engineering Report

RZC Public View Corridors and Gateways

R STREET CORRIDOR NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Supplemental Guidelines Checklist

The open space system should provide connective elements, relate to natural resources, and enhance the suburban character of the landscape..

McDonald s Restaurant - Purcellville Town of Purcellville Special Use Permit Statement of Justification July 24, 2014

ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET ARROYO PROJECTS

Fifth and Detroit Street Design May 2017 Capital Improvements Committee. DOWNTOWN Street Design

Hockessin Community Redevelopment Plan

Reconnecting to a Forgotten River St. Cloud MN. Aaron Hanson Design Design Thesis LA 572, Thesis, Spring 2012

Chapter 8. Visualizations

Port of Camas-Washougal Waterfront Trail Master Plan

SECTION 4(f) DE MINIMIS DOCUMENTATION

1.0 Circulation Element

GLEN ROAD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE #2 OCTOBER 24, 2017

Landscape and Streetscape Design 2.5

Division VI Community Mixed Use (CMU) Architectural Guidelines and Standards

CRYSTAL CITY BLOCK PLAN # CCBP- G 1 DRAFT

PROJECT STATEMENT LOCATION/DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING. 19 th AVENUE NORTH EXTENSION PROJECT FROM SPRINGDALE DRIVE TO NORTH 2 ND STREET/U.S.

PARKLET PROPOSAL PACKAGE & PROCESS

SDOT DCLU. Director s Rule Seattle Design Guidelines for Link Light Rail, Beacon Hill Station. City of Seattle

Visual and Aesthetics

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN

WELCOME NEIGHBORS! April 11, 2019

BRADENTON RIVERWALK EXPANSION MASTER PLAN

Promoting Economic Development Through Upfront SEPA Review: Lessons from South Downtown Tacoma

To qualify for federal Transportation Enhancement (TE) funds a project must meet two basic federal requirements:

INFRASTRUCTURE EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE A. Circulation B. Signals C. Drainage D. Utilities

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

Transcription:

Appendix H Historic Resources Discipline Report Draft Environmental Impact Statement Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk May 2015

Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk Draft Environmental Impact Statement Historic Resources Discipline Report Prepared for Seattle Department of Transportation Seattle, Washington May 2015

Contents Section Page Abbreviations... iii 1 Executive Summary... 1 1 2 Introduction and Project Description... 2 1 2.1 Introduction to the Project... 2 1 2.2 No Action Alternative... 2 3 2.2.1 Main Corridor... 2 3 2.2.2 Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Transit Facilities... 2 3 2.3 Action Alternative... 2 5 2.3.1 Main Corridor... 2 5 2.3.2 Promenade... 2 10 2.3.3 Overlook Walk... 2 11 2.3.4 Right of Way Acquisition... 2 13 2.3.5 Utilities... 2 13 2.4 Construction Methods for the Action Alternative... 2 13 2.4.1 Construction Sequencing... 2 14 2.4.2 Construction Activities... 2 16 2.4.3 Construction Staging... 2 17 2.4.4 Construction Timing and Road Closures... 2 17 2.4.5 Worker Access and Parking... 2 18 2.4.6 Construction Traffic and Haul Routes... 2 18 3 Regulatory Context... 3 1 4 Methodology... 4 1 4.1 Selection of Study Area... 4 1 4.2 Historic Resource Identification... 4 1 4.3 Identification of Impacts... 4 1 4.4 Identification of Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Measures... 4 2 4.5 Cumulative Impacts and Mitigation Measures Analysis... 4 2 5 Affected Environment... 5 1 5.1 Delineated Study Area... 5 1 5.2 Historical Development Context... 5 1 5.2.1 Early Settlement... 5 1 5.2.2 Growth of Trade and Development... 5 1 5.2.3 Seawalls... 5 4 5.2.4 World War II and Post War Changes... 5 5 5.2.5 Recent and Anticipated Future Changes... 5 6 5.3 Historic Resources... 5 6 6 Construction Impacts and Mitigation Measures... 6 1 6.1 Construction Impacts of the No Action Alternative... 6 1 6.2 Construction Impacts of the Action Alternative... 6 1 6.2.1 Main Corridor... 6 1 6.2.2 Promenade... 6 2 6.2.3 Overlook Walk... 6 2 6.3 Construction Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Measures for the Action Alternative... 6 2 7 Operational Impacts and Mitigation Measures... 7 1 7.1 Operational Impacts of the No Action Alternative... 7 1 MAY 2015 i

CONTENTS, CONTINUED 7.2 Operational Impacts of the Action Alternative... 7-1 7.2.1 Main Corridor... 7-1 7.2.2 Promenade... 7-2 7.2.3 Overlook Walk... 7-2 7.3 Operational Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Measures for the Action Alternative... 7-3 8 Cumulative Impacts and Mitigation Measures... 8-1 8.1 Study Area and Time Frame... 8-1 8.2 Current Health and Historical Context... 8-1 8.3 Project-Related Construction and Operational Impacts... 8-3 8.4 Other Reasonably Foreseeable Actions That May Affect the Resource... 8-3 8.5 Cumulative Impacts to Historic Resources... 8-7 8.6 Mitigation Measures for Cumulative Impacts... 8-7 9 References... 9-1 10 List of Preparers... 10-1 List of Tables Table 2-1. Typical Construction Equipment and Uses... 2-17 Table 5-1. Historic Districts and Landmarks in the Study Area... 5-7 Table 8-1. Reasonably Foreseeable Actions Considered in the Cumulative Impacts Analysis... 8-4 List of Figures Figure 2-1. Vicinity Map... 2-2 Figure 2-2. No Action Alternative... 2-4 Figure 2-3. Action Alternative S. King Street to Spring Street... 2-6 Figure 2-4. Action Alternative Spring Street to Pine Street... 2-7 Figure 2-5. Action Alternative Pine Street to Battery Street... 2-8 Figure 2-6. Overlook Walk Schematic Design... 2-12 Figure 2-7. Cross-section of Overlook Walk and Buildings North of Pike Street... 2-12 Figure 2-8. Action Alternative Work Zones and Potential Construction Staging Areas... 2-15 Figure 5-1. Historic Resources Study Area... 5-2 Figure 5-2. Historic Sites... 5-9 Figure 8-1. Reasonably Foreseeable Actions in the Project Vicinity... 8-2 ii MAY 2015

Abbreviations Term ADA AWPOW AWVRP BNSF CFR City CSO DAHP EBSP EIS EPA FHWA NRHP PPMHD PPMWE PSPD SEPA SDOT SL SMC SODO SR WAC WSDOT Meaning Americans with Disabilities Act Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement Project BNSF Railway Code of Federal Regulations City of Seattle combined sewer overflow Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Elliott Bay Seawall Project environmental impact statement U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Highway Administration National Register of Historic Places Pike Place Market Historic District Pike Place Market Waterfront Entrance Pioneer Square Preservation District State Environmental Policy Act Seattle Department of Transportation Seattle landmark Seattle Municipal Code south of downtown (Seattle) State Route Washington Administrative Code Washington State Department of Transportation MAY 2015 iii

1 Executive Summary This discipline report describes the historic resources that exist within and surrounding the footprint of the City of Seattle s Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk (AWPOW). The report analyzes the potential impacts of project construction and operation on these resources and recommends measures to avoid or minimize potential adverse impacts. Seattle's downtown waterfront is the birthplace of the city, the place where settlers arrived, and where a regional and, later, a worldwide commercial center developed. The project footprint includes portions of the Pioneer Square Preservation District and is adjacent to the Pike Place Market Historical District as well as 19 individual landmarks. These landmarks date predominantly from the late 19th and early 20th centuries and reflect the area s history as a working waterfront, as well as the commercial and transportation activities characteristic of the early days of the city. During construction, the Action Alternative would cause short-term impacts on historic resources. These would primarily result from reduced access and parking, which would make it more difficult for people to patronize businesses in historic buildings and districts, and from construction-related noise and dust. However, because construction work would be done in segments, each historic property would be affected for a relatively short period. While these short-term impacts would inconvenience residents, customers, and employees who use the historic properties, the ability of owners to maintain the historic integrity of their properties is not anticipated to be affected. Once the project is built, the primary potential impact would be alterations to the historic character of the waterfront, which could lessen the sense of connection between the waterfront and the buildings and neighborhoods east of Alaskan Way. The City of Seattle would coordinate with the Seattle Landmarks Board, the Pioneer Square Preservation Board, the Pike Place Market Historical Commission, and the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, as appropriate, to review measures that could maintain or enhance the waterfront s connection to these areas. These review processes would help to ensure that any adverse impacts are minimized or mitigated. This report also considered the cumulative impacts of the Action Alternative, in combination with the impacts of other concurrent and reasonably foreseeable actions or projects in the study area. Analysts concluded that cumulative impacts are not expected to significantly affect the status or condition of historic resources. Some minor changes may take place, but they are not anticipated to significantly alter the character or use of historic resources. Existing regulations and processes require detailed review of potential project impacts on historic resources so that effects can be avoided or minimized. MAY 2015 1-1

2 Introduction and Project Description This report documents the study of historical resources that was conducted for the City of Seattle s proposed Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk (AWPOW) project. The study was conducted to satisfy the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), its implementing regulations in Chapter 197-11 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC), and the City of Seattle s SEPA implementing code (Seattle Municipal Code [SMC] Chapter 25.05). SEPA requires a project's lead agency to consider the project alternatives, the condition of existing resources, the potential impacts of the project on those resources, and potential mitigation measures before deciding to proceed with the project. The City of Seattle s Department of Transportation (SDOT) is the lead agency for AWPOW. This report describes AWPOW s alternatives, the existing conditions, the potential historical resources impacts of AWPOW, and potential mitigation measures. 2.1 Introduction to the Project To take advantage of the opportunities, transportation needs, and related public objectives created by the replacement of the Alaskan Way Viaduct with a new State Route (SR) 99 tunnel, the City of Seattle is proposing a variety of infrastructure improvements to reconnect the Elliott Bay waterfront to the city s downtown core. The Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk project (hereafter referred to as AWPOW, the Action Alternative, or the project) is the largest of these planned improvements. AWPOW would provide transportation connections and public open space along Seattle s Elliott Bay waterfront between S. King Street and Battery Street. Figure 2-1 shows the location of the project in the context of downtown Seattle. While this report refers to AWPOW as a single project, for purposes of this report as well as for purposes of the other appendices to the AWPOW Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Draft EIS), AWPOW comprises three complementary projects. 1 These three projects are: The Main Corridor: A new Alaskan Way corridor from S. King Street to Pike Street, and a new Elliott Way corridor from Pike Street to Battery Street with improvements for general-purpose traffic, transit, freight, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities The Promenade: A continuous public open space along the waterfront The Overlook Walk: A new structure providing open space, view opportunities, and pedestrian connections between the waterfront and the Pike Place Market The study documented by this report evaluates the impacts of building the Action Alternative compared to the No Action Alternative. Both alternatives are described in greater detail below. Construction of the Elliott Bay Seawall Project (EBSP), Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement Project (AWVRP), and Pike Place Market Waterfront Entrance (PPMWE) building will be completed before AWPOW begins and are therefore part of the existing condition for both the No Action and Action alternatives. 1 For purposes of the AWPOW Draft EIS, AWPOW comprises four projects: the Alaskan Way, Promenade, Overlook Walk, and East-West Connections projects. Environmental review for the East-West Connections project is included in Appendix L to this Draft EIS. MAY 2015 2-1

Green Lake 5 99 Puget Sound 520 Lake Union Regional Locator Everett Tacoma Seattle SNOHOMISH COUNTY KING COUNTY Elliott Bay Seattle Olympia 519 90 0 0.5 1 Miles Figure 2-1 Vicinity Map Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk

2.2 No Action Alternative HISTORIC RESOURCES DISCIPLINE REPORT Under the No Action Alternative, AWPOW would not be built. However, conditions in the area would be different from those that exist at the time this EIS is published (2015). Major changes assumed to be in place under the No Action Alternative are: The AWVRP will be complete, with the viaduct eliminated and the bored tunnel in operation. Parking that existed beneath the viaduct prior to the start of AWVRP construction is assumed to have been restored. The EBSP will have been completed, along with associated habitat improvements that include a new sidewalk inset with light-penetrating surface (LPS). The PPMWE building will be complete. The analysis for the No Action Alternative is based on the expected conditions in 2030, which is the project design year (the year used for the assessment of future conditions). The No Action Alternative serves as the baseline against which the potential impacts of the Action Alternative will be evaluated. Figure 2-2 depicts the No Action Alternative. 2.2.1 Main Corridor Upon completion of the EBSP (currently planned for 2016), Alaskan Way will be restored to the alignment that it occupied until construction began on the AWVRP and EBSP. That alignment is immediately west of and generally parallel to the present alignment of the Alaskan Way Viaduct. The roadway will have two lanes serving general-purpose traffic in each direction. Alaskan Way between S. King Street and Yesler Way, which is designated as SR 519 at this location, will include an additional northbound lane to serve ferry traffic between S. King and S. Main Streets and two left-turn lanes between S. Main Street and Yesler Way. The east-west streets will generally connect to the restored roadway as they did before EBSP construction started, although the intersections of Alaskan Way with Columbia and Seneca Streets will be modified after removal of the Alaskan Way Viaduct ramps. There will be signals at all intersections. As was the case before EBSP and AWVRP work began, the restored Alaskan Way will not have a direct connection to Western Avenue or Elliott Avenue in Belltown. Vehicles traveling north on the restored Alaskan Way would need to use Wall, Vine, or Broad Streets to cross the BNSF rail line and access Belltown. The City-owned right of way beneath the Alaskan Way Viaduct would be restored to its original configuration in 2010, before EBSP and AWVRP construction began. This configuration includes parking spaces with pay stations as well as business and parking access lanes. Approximately the same number of parking spaces is assumed to be provided as were in place in 2010. Utilities would remain in the same locations they will occupy after completion of the EBSP and AWVRP. 2.2.2 Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Transit Facilities Upon completion of the EBSP, bicycle and pedestrian facilities will generally match those existing in the corridor before EBSP construction began in 2013, but with improvements to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A sidewalk will run along the western edge of the restored Alaskan Way. The sidewalk will contain a continuous band of LPS to improve habitat conditions for migrating salmon. On the east side of the restored Alaskan Way, an 8- to 10-foot-wide path will provide through access for bicycles and pedestrians. The Marion Street pedestrian bridge, which currently connects First Avenue with the Seattle Multimodal Terminal at Colman Dock, will remain in place. Access from Pike Place Market to the waterfront would remain limited to the Pike Street Hillclimb and the steep stairs along the undeveloped slope west of the market. Once the AWVRP is completed, transit routes that were previously on the viaduct would be rerouted onto surface streets. Bus stops along Alaskan Way that existed prior to AWVRP and EBSP construction would be restored. MAY 2015 2-3

PINE ST PIKE ST UNION ST SENECA ST SPRING ST MADISON ST MARION ST TERRACE ST Elliott Bay Pier 48 Colman Dock Pier 54 Pier 55 ALASKAN WAY (RESTORED) Pier 56 Pier 57 Waterfront Park Seattle Aquarium Pier 62/63 ALASKAN WAY (RESTORED) WESTERN AVE BNSF RAILROAD ELL IOTT AVE BATTERY ST S JACKSON ST 1ST AVE S OCCIDENTAL AVE S 1ST AVE POST AVE WESTERN AVE PIKE PLACE STEWART ST BLANCHARD ST 2ND AVE 2ND AVE S S WASHINGTON ST YESLER WAY JAMES ST VIRGINIA ST WALL ST 1ST AVE S MAIN ST WESTERN AVE UNIVERSITY ST 1ST AVE LENORA ST 1ST AVE BELL ST COLUMBIA ST D AV ET S 3RD AVE S 2ND AVE 3RD AVE 4TH AVE CHERRY ST 2ND AVE 3RD AVE 4TH AVE 3RD AVE 4TH AVE 5TH AVE 5TH AVE 5TH AVE 6TH AVE 0 400 800 Feet Source: King County, City of Seattle UNIVERSITY ST No Action Alternative Parcel Boundary Figure 2-2 No Action Alternative Alaskan Way (Restored) Sidewalks Path on east side of Alaskan Way Building Footprint New Seawall Face Existing Viaduct Removed Pike Place Market Waterfront Entrance (PPMWE) Building Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk

2.3 Action Alternative HISTORIC RESOURCES DISCIPLINE REPORT The Action Alternative would implement AWPOW after the AWVRP, EBSP, and PPMWE have been constructed. This alternative consists of the main corridor (which includes a new Alaskan Way with new connections to Elliott and Western Avenues), the Promenade, and the Overlook Walk. These projects are described below, along with right of way acquisition needs and utility modifications. Figures 2-3 through 2-5 show the project s footprint and features. 2.3.1 Main Corridor The main corridor would operate as part of the regional transportation system, serving some of the functions that will no longer be provided by SR 99 after the Alaskan Way Viaduct is replaced with a tunnel. The main corridor would serve both local and regional transportation needs for a wide array of users, providing access between SR 99 and downtown Seattle as well as direct access to northwest Seattle. In addition to passenger, transit, and freight vehicles, it would accommodate high levels of pedestrian and bicycle traffic and would improve connections between the waterfront and downtown Seattle. The major features of the corridor are summarized below. 2.3.1.1 New Alaskan Way with Connections to Elliott and Western Avenues The project would build a new Alaskan Way corridor to accommodate general-purpose traffic, regional transit, and freight traffic; allow safe, efficient turning movements and pedestrian crossings; provide areas for loading and access; and improve connections between the waterfront and downtown Seattle, as well as to Belltown. The proposed improvements consist of: Construction of the new Alaskan Way between S. King Street and Pine Street, along the east side of the right of way Construction of a new arterial connection, called Elliott Way, which would follow the path of the existing Alaskan Way Viaduct from Alaskan Way at Pine Street up the hill into Belltown, where it would connect with Elliott and Western Avenues A rebuilt intersection at Pine Street (referred to as the Pine Street extension) that would connect the new Alaskan Way and new Elliott Way with the existing Alaskan Way north of Pier 62/63 A dedicated transit lane in each direction along Alaskan Way between S. King Street and Columbia Street and on Columbia Street between Alaskan Way and First Avenue, which are both part of King County Metro's Southwest Transit Pathway improvements to address transit needs following AWVRP completion Northbound ferry queuing lanes between S. King Street and Yesler Way, which include double left-turn lanes between S. Main Street and Yesler Way 2.3.1.2 Pedestrian Facilities While the Promenade and Overlook Walk (described in separate sections below) are major pedestrian facilities in their own right, the new Alaskan Way and the new Elliott Way connection would include substantial improvements for pedestrians. A 10- to 16-foot-wide sidewalk would abut the west edge of the new Alaskan Way. On the east side of the new Alaskan Way, the project would include 20- to 30-foot-wide sidewalks between S. King Street and Yesler Way. This sidewalk would support pedestrian movements linking the stadiums, Pioneer Square, and Colman Dock. North of Yesler Way, the sidewalk on the east side would be 14 to 20 feet wide. The sidewalks would provide improved connections with intersecting streets, and would allow greater public exposure for businesses in buildings on the east side of Alaskan Way. Landscaping would buffer the sidewalks from the street. Sidewalks would be built along the new Elliott Way, allowing pedestrians to walk from Alaskan Way to Belltown. Signalized pedestrian crossings would be provided at all intersections. MAY 2015 2-5

AVE. S. I Terminal 46 ELLIOTT BAY ALASKAN WAY S. KING ST. S. KING ST. Pier 48 8 Colman Dock FIRST AVE. S. S. JACKSON ST. S. MAIN ST. Washington St. Boat Landing Colman Dock Transit Hub Fire Station Pier 54 Pier 55 Ar To OCCIDENTAL AVE. S. S. WASHINGTON ST. YESLER WAY Marion St. Pedestrian Bridge ALASKAN WAY WESTERN AVE. MADISON A D ST. SPRING P G ST. Occidental Park POST AVE. COLUMBIA ST. MARION ST. POST ALLEY SENECA ST. FIRST AVE. 0 50 100 Feet 200 xxx Project Elements Project Footprint Potential Construction Staging Area Kiosk Potential Future Conditions xxx Existing or Future Facilities Pedestrian Pathway Figure 2-3 Action Alternative S. King Street to Spring Street Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk

I ELLIOTT BAY Seattle Great Wheel Pier 62/63 2 ALASKAN WA ALASKAN N WA Seattle Aquarium Argosy Tours Fire Station Pier 54 Pier 55 Pier 56 Pier 57 Aquarium Plaza Building C Overlook Walk PINE ST. ELLIOTT WAY BN ALASKAN WAY ALASKAN WAY Building B Victor Steinbrueck Park on St. estrian ge WESTERN AVE. MADISON A D ST. SPRING P G ST. UNIVERSITY S T Y ST. WESTERN AVE. UNION I N ST. T Pike St. Hill Climb WESTERN AVE. PIKE PLACE STEWART ST. PPMWE Building Pike Place Market VIRGINIA ST. POST ALLEY SENECA ST. POST ALLEY PIKE ST. PINE ST. FIRST AVE. FIRST AVE. 0 50 100 Feet 200 xxx Project Elements Project Footprint Potential Construction Staging Area Kiosk Potential Future Conditions xxx Existing or Future Facilities Pedestrian Pathway Figure 2-4 Action Alternative Spring Street to Pine Street Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk

ELLIOTT BAY Bell Harbor Marina Bell Harbor Conference Center Bell St. Bridge ALASKAN WAY BNSF RAILROAD Bell Harbor ELLIOTT AVE Pier 62/632 ALASKAN WAY. ALASKAN N WAY Seattle Aquarium Aquarium Plaza Building C Overlook Walk PINE ST. ELLIOTT WAY BNSF RAILROAD Lenora St. Pedestrian Bridge Improvements Battery St. Interim Improvements Building Walk B Victor Steinbrueck Park BLANCHARD ST. BELL ST. WESTERN AVE. BATTERY ST. FIRST AVE. Pike St. Hill Climb PPMWE Building LENORA ST. WESTERN AVE. PIKE PLACE STEWART ST. Pike Place Market VIRGINIA ST. SECOND AVE. PIKE ST. PINE ST. 0 50 100 200 xxx Project Elements Project Footprint Potential Construction Staging Area xxx Existing or Future Facilities Pedestrian Pathway Figure 2-5 Action Alternative Pine Street to Battery Street Feet Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk

HISTORIC RESOURCES DISCIPLINE REPORT In addition to the pedestrian improvements listed above, the project would rebuild the Marion Street pedestrian bridge, which links First Avenue with Colman Dock across Western Avenue and Alaskan Way, and construct a pedestrian plaza area at the west end of Blanchard Street. 2.3.1.3 Bicycle Facilities A continuous, protected two-way bicycle facility would run along the new Alaskan Way and continue up Elliott Way. (The City designates facilities of this type as protected bike lanes ; they are referred to as "protected bicycle facilities" or bicycle facilities in this report.) The 12-foot-wide bicycle facility would begin on the west side of the road at S. Main Street, where it would provide connections to the south via the Port-side Trail. The bicycle facility would run on the west side of Alaskan Way from S. Main Street to about Virginia Street, where it would cross the road to join the existing path on the east side of the roadway. At Pine Street, the bicycle facility would branch eastward to run up the Pine Street extension, where it would join Elliott Way. North of the intersection with Elliott Way, the facility would transition to two separate 6-foot-wide bike lanes, with the lane on the east side of Elliott Way carrying northbound bicycles and the lane on the west side of the street carrying southbound bicycles. North of Bell Street, these bike lanes would connect with existing lanes on Elliott and Western Avenues in Belltown. Along the new Alaskan Way, the bicycle facility would be separated from the roadway and pedestrian areas by landscaping and other means to limit potential conflicts among pedestrians, bicyclists, and motor vehicles. Pedestrians would be permitted to cross the bicycle path at specific locations, including crosswalks, transit stops, and loading zones. Standard and specialized signals would regulate bicycle crossings at intersections along Alaskan Way. 2.3.1.4 Columbia and Seneca Street Improvements The project would include improvements to Columbia and Seneca Streets to help connect the waterfront with downtown Seattle. Along with the presence of the viaduct ramps on Columbia and Seneca Streets, the steep gradient between the waterfront and the areas to the east has historically been an impediment to east-west travel. The removal of the viaduct ramps by the AWVRP will create space for the City to reconstruct Columbia Street with urban design features that provide a visual connection from Alaskan Way to First Avenue. The City would also install two-way transit lanes (along with one general-purpose lane) on Columbia Street as part of King County s Southwest Transit Pathway improvements. At Seneca Street, the project would reconstruct the block between Alaskan Way and Western Avenue primarily for pedestrian and parking use. The street would continue to dead-end at the retaining wall on the west side of First Avenue; the existing stairs at this location would remain. 2.3.1.5 Local Waterfront Transit Facilities The project would build accommodations to support new local bus service along the waterfront, including curb space for bus stops along Alaskan Way. Although transit service is not part of the project, any new transit services would complement other transit services planned to serve Alaskan Way, such as King County Metro s RapidRide bus rapid transit service; the proposed Madison Street Corridor bus rapid transit route connecting the Seattle Multimodal Terminal at Colman Dock to First Hill; the new First Hill Streetcar line, which terminates in Pioneer Square; and the proposed City Center Streetcar line on First Avenue. The local bus service along Alaskan Way would share the outside or curb lane with general-purpose traffic, and all stops would be at the curbside. MAY 2015 2-9

2.3.2 Promenade The Promenade would be a continuous public open space along the west side of the new main corridor from S. King Street to Virginia Street that would be designed for walking, sitting, gathering, and viewing the waterfront. Design features and landscaping along its length would create a series of different environments, or places, that would reflect the character of the surrounding areas. These places are: Colman Dock Transit Hub, an area supporting the regional transit hub in front of the Seattle Multimodal Terminal at Colman Dock. It would accommodate the heavy pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle traffic coming through the Yesler Way, Columbia Street, and Marion Street intersections. The area s primary design features would be a grouping of trees, seating, and bicycle parking and rental facilities. Historic Piers 54 through 59, where narrow boardwalks or paths would traverse planted terraces with integrated seating. The lower terraces would be designed to collect stormwater runoff from portions of the street and from the Promenade. Aquarium Plaza would be a broad public gathering area at the intersection of the Seattle Aquarium, the Pike Street Hillclimb, and the Overlook Walk. In this location, the Promenade would widen because of Alaskan Way s eastward shift to transition into Elliott Way. The Aquarium Plaza would connect the Aquarium s existing buildings with the new Overlook Walk, Pier 62/63, and pedestrian facilities to the north. Public amenities could include elements such as bench seating, recreational features, and a cafe area with movable tables and chairs. The westernmost portion of the Promenade would include the band of LPS, cantilevered over Elliott Bay, which will be built as part of the EBSP. New, permanent railings would replace the temporary railings installed by the EBSP at the western edge of the overhang. The remainder of the Promenade would be constructed of an architectural concrete surface that would feature exposed aggregate, grooved concrete, and metal inlays. A linear canopy of trees would provide a buffer between the Promenade and the street. The species mix would combine native plants with non-native, non-invasive, and salt-tolerant species. Many areas have been identified as open planting areas, which would be completely pervious. Where paving is required adjacent to planting zones, a supported pavement system would provide tree roots with access to soil underneath the adjacent pavement. Kiosks would be located on the Promenade in front of the historic pier buildings, at the intersections of Alaskan Way with Spring, Seneca, University, and Union Streets. They would provide focal points for wayfinding and other services. A typical kiosk footprint would be 16 feet by 16 feet, and the structures would be approximately 46 to 48 feet high. The kiosks would be designed to be open during the day and securely closed at night or when not in use. In their current preliminary design, the upper part of a typical kiosk would be made of reflective materials arrayed in flat planes at different angles, like a faceted tower. The kiosks are intended to be beacons that are immediately recognizable and would reflect the sky and water to the people on the waterfront. They would be used to provide a variety of amenities for the traveling public, which could include the sale of food, flowers, and newspapers, and bicycle rentals, among other things. Lighting along the Promenade would be designed in a layered pattern to provide visual interest and wayfinding clarity. The Promenade would include pedestrian scale column luminaires, integrated into seating where possible. In some locations, LED light sources would provide low-level illumination of benches, handrails, and trees. Linear in ground accent lighting may be installed to provide visual accents, such as at places where multiple boardwalk sections intersect. 2-10 MAY 2015

2.3.3 Overlook Walk HISTORIC RESOURCES DISCIPLINE REPORT The Overlook Walk would occupy existing and new public space south of Victor Steinbrueck Park, west of Pike Place Market, and northeast of the Seattle Aquarium, as shown in Figures 2 6 and 2 7. The Overlook Walk would be composed of two buildings and a sloping lid that would extend southwest from the Pike Place Market, across the new Elliott Way, and down more than 100 vertical feet to the waterfront near the Seattle Aquarium and Pier 62/63. The Overlook Walk would include over an acre of public open space, provide active gathering spaces and elevated scenic viewing opportunities, create a robust and accessible pedestrian connection with multiple ways to travel between Pike Place Market and the waterfront, and provide opportunities to enhance the pedestrian experience and revitalize the area. At its upper easternmost end, the Overlook Walk would tie into a separate project the PPMWE building. The Overlook Walk lid would have two long pedestrian ramps traversing the slope, two landing areas, and landscaped gardens. It would include north and south facing viewpoints, a children s play area, and tables and benches to provide seating at various points. Stairs would link the northern part of the Overlook Walk to Victor Steinbrueck Park and Elliott Way. On the southwest side of the lid, wide, amphitheater style steps would open onto Pier 62/63. The configuration of the Overlook Walk against the hillside would provide an opportunity to create two new buildings, known as Building B and Building C. (The former Building A is now the PPMWE building, which is a separate project.) Buildings B and C would be used for public uses and to serve transportation functions, as well as for incidental private uses. One use currently being considered for Building C is an expansion of the Seattle Aquarium. Building B would be located on the east side of Elliott Way, as shown on Figure 2 7. The building would rise above the east edge of the Overlook Walk lid, with windows facing onto the lid s main pedestrian ramp and gardens. Building B would contain approximately 23,000 square feet of interior space, with elevator access provided to the Overlook Walk lid, Elliott Way, and the floors of the building itself. Access would also be provided to the new PPMWE parking garage. At the southern end of Building B, a wide external staircase would descend to the level of the new Alaskan Way and connect to the Pike Street Hillclimb, the Fix/Madore buildings, and the Aquarium Plaza. Building C would be located beneath the wide amphitheater steps connecting the Overlook Walk lid to the Aquarium Plaza. The building would contain approximately 22,000 square feet of interior space. An elevator inside the building would allow access to the top of the amphitheater steps, where a landing would provide space for gatherings, small scale performances, and enjoyment of views. MAY 2015 2-11

Figure 2-6. Overlook Walk Schematic Design Figure 2-7. Cross-section of Overlook Walk and Buildings North of Pike Street 2-12 MAY 2015

2.3.4 Right of Way Acquisition HISTORIC RESOURCES DISCIPLINE REPORT The project design for AWPOW was developed to keep proposed new features within existing City property and rights of way to the greatest extent feasible. However, the project would require the partial acquisition of approximately five properties and full acquisition of two properties. The two full acquisitions are a commercial building at 1528 Alaskan Way and a small public off-street parking lot at 1529 Alaskan Way. The City would also need to acquire easements to temporarily use private property during project construction. Use of such construction easements would not remove existing buildings or loading docks, although access to some loading docks might be temporarily modified as a result of the easements. 2.3.5 Utilities AWPOW would relocate, construct, or modify several major utility facilities within the project footprint. Numerous utilities currently run along Alaskan Way, either underground or supported on the Alaskan Way Viaduct, including electrical transmission lines, gas mains, water mains, sewer mains, telecommunications lines, and a steam line. A number of these utilities will be relocated as part of the AWVRP and EBSP. The work to be performed on major utility facilities would include: Relocating the portion of Seattle City Light s (SCL) eastern 13.8-kV distribution duct bank along Alaskan Way between S. Washington Street and Pine Street Relocating the portion of SCL s Transmission Line 4 that runs beneath the Alaskan Way Viaduct footprint between Union and Blanchard Streets Constructing a joint telecommunications duct bank along Alaskan Way so that existing communications lines can be relocated underground and the existing timber poles can be removed; the new joint duct bank would have space for other companies to add facilities along Alaskan Way Constructing or reconstructing some of Puget Sound Energy s (PSE) gas distribution lines and services Relocating fire hydrants to locations compatible with AWPOW s main corridor Constructing a new water main along Elliott Way Constructing new water distribution lines to serve AWPOW elements such as irrigation systems, kiosks, and water fountains Constructing sewer system upgrades along Alaskan Way Constructing a complete storm drain collection system of pipes and catch basins in the main corridor and as part of the Promenade and Overlook Walk; some of the existing stormwater mains may be incorporated into this system Relocating a 30-inch storm drain near Alaskan Way and Western Avenue 2.4 Construction Methods for the Action Alternative This section describes the construction methods that the City currently anticipates using for the Action Alternative. Because of the dynamic nature of construction, the sequencing, extent, and timing of construction activities would vary to some degree from what are described here. However, this description represents a reasonable scenario that allows an understanding of the range of potential methods that could be used as the project is being built. In general, construction would be timed and sequenced to minimize impacts on nearby residents and businesses. It is expected that at least two lanes of Alaskan Way (one in each direction) would remain open during morning and afternoon peak traffic hours, except for a full closure for the period necessary MAY 2015 2-13

to construct the new Pine Street extension and the western portion of the Overlook Walk. This full closure of Alaskan Way would extend approximately one block between the Seattle Aquarium and Pier 62/63. During this closure of Alaskan Way, at least two lanes of Elliott Way (one in each direction) would be open during morning and afternoon peak traffic hours to provide a north-south route. Clearly signed detour routes would be provided around construction areas. Throughout construction, the City would maintain access to private property to the maximum extent feasible, and would notify property owners in advance of activities that might temporarily limit access. In addition, the City would coordinate with affected property owners and support outreach activities to minimize the potential impacts of construction. 2.4.1 Construction Sequencing Construction is planned to begin with utility work, which could begin in 2017 before the Alaskan Way Viaduct is demolished. Other construction activities would begin in any given areas once the viaduct demolition is complete. Construction of AWPOW is anticipated to be completed by about mid-2020. The construction time frame could shift depending on when the AWVRP is completed. Construction activities would be sequenced to achieve two primary early goals: Complete the new Elliott Way connection to allow traffic to travel between Alaskan Way and Elliott and Western Avenues. This connection is currently provided by the Alaskan Way Viaduct; restoring it as soon as possible after this portion of the viaduct is demolished will help alleviate traffic congestion. Create the interim transit pathway on Columbia Street between Alaskan Way and First Avenue to provide reliable transit connections during construction. AWPOW construction could be divided into four zones, identified as Work Zones I, II, III, and IV. These zones would apply to most construction activities, but utility work would be independent of them. The approximate boundaries of these zones are described below and shown in Figure 2-8. Work Zone I would extend from the southern project limits to Madison Street. Work in this zone would include construction of the new Alaskan Way, the Promenade, and Columbia Street improvements, and replacement of the Marion Street pedestrian bridge. Work Zone II would extend from the Madison Street intersection to Pike Street, and would include construction of the new Alaskan Way, the Promenade, and Seneca Street. Work Zone III would extend from Pike Street northward to the end of the bridge over the BNSF rail line, about a block south of Lenora Street. This zone would include construction of the new Alaskan Way as it climbs from Pike Street to Pine Street, the Promenade, the Pine Street extension to the west, Buildings B and C, the Overlook Walk lid, and the portion of Elliott Way from Pine Street over the BNSF rail line on a new bridge. Work Zone IV would extend from the end of the bridge over the BNSF rail line to the northern project limits. Work in this zone would include construction of Elliott Way from the north side of the BNSF rail line to where it intersects Elliott and Western Avenues. Work would also include reconstruction of the pedestrian bridge and overlook at the west end of Lenora Street. The sequence of construction activities has not yet been finalized due to the dynamic nature of other projects in the area and because project design is not yet complete. The currently preferred construction sequence is to simultaneously begin building the portion of Elliott Way that crosses the BNSF rail line (in Work Zone III) and begin work at Columbia Street (in Work Zone I). Construction would then generally proceed north from S. King Street in Work Zone I and north from where Elliott Way crosses the BNSF rail line in Work Zone IV. This construction sequence would allow early traffic connections between Western and Elliott Avenues and Alaskan Way via the new Elliott Way, as well as transit connections between Columbia Street and Alaskan Way. 2-14 MAY 2015

JAMES ST PINE ST UNION ST MADISON ST MARION ST TERRACE ST UNIVERSITY ST PIKE ST SENECA ST SPRING ST COLUMB A I ST CHERRY ST ALASKAN WAY S RAILROAD WAY S S KING ST S JACKSON ST S MAIN ST 1ST AVE S OCCIDENTAL AVE S Work Zone I Pier 48 POST AVE Colman Dock Pier 54 Pier 55 ALASKAN WAY Pier 56 Elliott Bay Work Zone II Pier 57 Waterfront Park WESTERN AVE 1ST AVE Seattle Aquarium Work Zone III Pier 62/63 PIKE PLACE STEWART ST VIRGINIA ST Work Zone IV WESTERN AVE LENORA ST BNSF RAILROAD 1ST AVE 2ND AVE BLANCHARD ST BELL ST ALASKAN WAY ELLIOTT AVE BATTERY ST WALL ST VINE ST 2ND AV ET S NORTHERN PACIFIC RR 2ND AVE S 5TH AVE S S WASHINGTON ST YESLER WAY 2ND AVE 3RD AVE 4TH AVE 3RD AVE 4TH AVE 5TH AVE 5TH AVE 6TH AVE 0 400 Feet Source: SDOT 800 Action Alternative Parcel Boundary Project Footprint Building Footprint Potential Construction Staging Area Note: Construction staging will also occur within the project footprint. Figure 2-8 Action Alternative Work Zones and Potential Construction Staging Areas Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk

2.4.2 Construction Activities AWPOW construction is expected to consist of the following general activities: Utility removal, replacement, or relocation Demolition of the existing Alaskan Way roadway and appurtenances Ground improvement, where necessary, to stabilize soils for support Dewatering of excavations below the water table (generally about 5 feet below ground surface along the waterfront) to provide a dry work area, where necessary Use of best management practices (BMPs) to protect water quality and reduce erosion; these may include installation of silt fencing, covering of stockpiled soil, and collection and treatment of construction stormwater runoff Drilling and vibratory pile driving for deep shafts to support the Overlook Walk and Elliott Way bridge structures Earthwork (excavation and filling) for the Pine Street extension and the section of Elliott Way between Lenora Street and the bridge over the BNSF tunnel Micropile driving to support structures such as the kiosks and the Marion Street pedestrian bridge Placement of foundation and pavement for the new Alaskan Way and Elliott Way roadways, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities Installation of Promenade elements including paving, benches, kiosks, and landscaping Installation of street lighting, signal poles, and signage Table 2-1 provides a list of typical construction equipment and the types of activities in which the equipment is used. The construction of the new Alaskan Way corridor within Work Zones I and II could occur in sections ranging from one block to several blocks in length. Within each section, the new Alaskan Way would be built first, and traffic would then be transferred from the restored Alaskan Way to the new Alaskan Way. Work would then begin on the section of the Promenade adjacent to the newly constructed section of Alaskan Way. Meanwhile, roadway reconstruction would begin on the next section to the north. Work in Zones III and IV would include construction of bridge structures (piers, columns, girders, and concrete deck) and retaining walls to support the new roadway. Also, abutments supporting the north side of the bridge over the BNSF rail line would be constructed, as well as earth fill and retaining walls for the Pine Street extension. Support for these large structures would be provided by drilled shafts, which could be up to 80 feet deep in some areas. Where shafts cannot be installed by drilling, vibratory methods could be used. Work in Zone III would begin with ground improvement to provide a stable foundation for the new piers and walls. The general work sequence would then be to construct the elevated roadway, including bridge girders and decks; complete the foundations of Buildings B and C; construct the Overlook Walk lid; open Elliott Way; and complete the Pine Street extension. Work on the Promenade north of Pine Street would begin once the Pine Street extension is open to traffic. Work in Zone IV along Elliott Way and Elliott and Western Avenues would include street restoration, sidewalk construction, bicycle facility construction, and installation of street lighting and signal poles. On Elliott Avenue, work would also consist of changes in channelization of the bicycle facility. 2-16 MAY 2015

HISTORIC RESOURCES DISCIPLINE REPORT Table 2-1. Typical Construction Equipment and Uses Equipment Air compressor Backhoe Concrete pump Concrete saw Crane Excavator Forklift Generator Haul truck Jackhammer Loader Paver Pump Pneumatic tools Service truck Tractor trailer truck Utility truck Vibratory equipment Typical Use Pneumatic tool power and general maintenance General construction Placement of concrete Concrete removal and utility access Materials handling, removal, and replacement General construction and materials handling Staging area work and hauling of materials General construction work Materials delivery and transport of fill and excess soil Pavement removal General construction and materials handling Roadway paving General construction use and excavation dewatering Miscellaneous construction work Repair and maintenance of equipment Material removal and delivery General project work Slope stabilization, concrete removal, and installation of support piles 2.4.3 Construction Staging The project would generally use areas within or near the project footprint for construction staging and storing materials and equipment. Temporary construction offices, such as trailers, could also be used in these areas. Most construction staging would occur within the main part of the project footprint. However, the City is exploring the use of other areas for construction staging to help ensure that sufficient space will be available to cover all anticipated staging needs. These potential construction staging areas are shown in Figure 2 8. There may be interest in using Pier 48 and Pier 62/63 as potential construction staging areas due to their proximity to project construction activities. Pier 48 is owned by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and cannot be used for staging without WSDOT s permission. Pier 62/63 is owned by the City of Seattle, but its potential use as a staging area may be limited due to structural concerns. All staging areas that are used would generally be restored, if necessary, to their pre construction condition or better. 2.4.4 Construction Timing and Road Closures Construction would occur year round and is likely to include multiple shifts, especially in Work Zone III where construction activities are most complex. The contractor would need to comply with the City s noise regulations and obtain any necessary variances from the City during construction. In general, at least two lanes (one in each direction) on Alaskan Way or Elliott Way would be open during morning and afternoon peak traffic hours throughout construction, although one or more lanes could be temporarily closed at other times to provide access for construction equipment and utility installations. MAY 2015 2-17

Approximately one block of Alaskan Way between the Seattle Aquarium and Pier 62/63 would be closed for the period necessary to construct the new Pine Street extension and the western portion of the Overlook Walk. Northbound traffic on Alaskan Way destined for points north of the closure would need to detour onto Elliott Way and then use an east-west street to access the portion of Alaskan Way north of the closure. After the closure, points on Alaskan Way north of Pine Street would be accessible via the new Pine Street extension. The City would work with the Port of Seattle to identify adequate time frames for this work to minimize impacts during the cruise ship season. 2.4.5 Worker Access and Parking The contractor is expected to establish a job site office, which could be located in existing office space along the waterfront or elsewhere within the project footprint. While a limited number of construction workers would park at the job site office, other construction workers may use transit to access the work site or may park within or near the construction footprint. 2.4.6 Construction Traffic and Haul Routes Construction would generate traffic to transport materials and equipment to the work site and to remove demolition debris and excess soil. The majority of material transport for AWPOW construction would be by truck, augmented by the possible occasional use of barges. The contractor will determine the best construction methods as permitted by the City and in conformance with the project construction plans. Preliminary estimates indicate that, on average, there would be 7 to 27 round-trip truck trips per work zone per work day, with a peak of 66 daily round trips at the peak of construction in Work Zone III. Because Alaskan Way is a major freight corridor, this is not expected to constitute a major increase in truck traffic. City streets that could be used as haul routes include Alaskan Way, Elliott Avenue, Western Avenue, Mercer Street, Broad Street, Edgar Martinez Drive, and East Marginal Way. 2-18 MAY 2015

3 Regulatory Context Local laws and regulations govern historic resources that could be impacted by AWPOW construction or operation. These laws and regulations are listed and briefly discussed below. Federal laws protecting historic resources, such as the National Historic Preservation Act, do not apply to AWPOW because the project will not receive federal funds, be permitted by a federal agency, or be constructed on federal land. State laws, such as Executive Order 05 05, do not apply because AWPOW is not a state agency capital construction project. Several City of Seattle ordinances, guidelines, and agreements apply to historic resources in and near the AWPOW footprint. These are described below and include ordinances and guidelines relating to City of Seattle historic districts and more generally to City of Seattle landmarks and SEPA review. Pioneer Square Preservation District Ordinance (SMC Chapter 23.66) and Guidelines Any changes made within the Pioneer Square Preservation District require a Certificate of Approval from the Pioneer Square Preservation Board. This requirement covers exterior alterations to buildings; changes to public areas including alleys, streets, and sidewalks; new businesses or services; signs or changes to existing signs; demolition; and new construction or additions. Approval is based on the district guidelines and the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Urban Harborfront Historic Character Area Review (SMC 23.60.704) SMC 23.60.704 establishes a Waterfront Historic Character Area, extending from the south edge of Pier 54 to the north edge of Pier 59. All applications for development in this area are to be referred to the Seattle Landmarks Preservation Board for review and comment prior to the issuance of a permit. The criteria focus primarily on retaining the form and orientation of the pier sheds, limiting exterior alterations, and retaining the setting of the piers. Pike Place Market Historical District Ordinance (SMC Chapter 25.24) and Guidelines Any changes made within the Pike Place Market Historical District require a Certificate of Approval from the Pike Place Market Historical Commission. This includes not only alterations to buildings, but also changes to public areas including alleys, streets, and sidewalks; new uses or businesses; signage and display structures; some interior alterations; and new construction or additions. Approval is based on the district guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. City of Seattle Landmarks Preservation Ordinance (SMC Chapter 25.12) and Guidelines Changes made to a designated Seattle landmark require a Certificate of Approval from the Seattle Landmarks Preservation Board. Examples include exterior alterations, installation of or alteration of signs, additions, demolitions, site alterations, and interior changes that show from the street. Approval is based on the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Landmark Adjacency Review (SMC 25.05.675H.2.d) Projects located next to or across the street from a designated City landmark are to be referred to the City Historic Preservation Officer for an assessment of any adverse effects on the landmark. Mitigation may be required to ensure the compatibility of the project with the color, material, or architectural character of the landmark and to reduce the impacts of the project on the character of the landmark's site. MAY 2015 3-1