* * * * * * * * * * *

Similar documents
Article 3: Police Regulated Occupations and Businesses. Division 37: Burglary, Robbery and Emergency Alarm Systems

ARTICLE 4-13 ALARM SYSTEMS * Division 1. Generally

Authorized individuals to be notified. Include two (2) persons with access to the premises to allow emergency access.


ARTICLE II FALSE ALARMS

This chapter shall be known as the "City of Bayfield Alarm Systems Ordinance."

Chapter ALARM SYSTEMS

CHAPTER 91: ALARM SYSTEMS

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Rocklin hereby ordains as follows:

ORDINANCE NO

City of Regina Alarm Bylaw

ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL

MONTGOMERY COUNTY RULES GOVERNING ALARMS SECTION 1. PURPOSE SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS

RESIDENTIAL ALARM USER PERMIT APPLICATION

dss PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 4.11

PART D. Emergency Alarms. Section 402. Definitions. The following definitions shall apply in the interpretation and enforcement of this ordinance:

RECITALS. A public hearing was held on the day of, 2009, following due notice and advertisement of the text of the Ordinance.

maintaining the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City and its visitors; and

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D

Charter reference Conflicts between county and municipal ordinances, 2.01, 2.04.

Purpose Definitions. Chapter BURGLAR ALARM SYSTEMS *

BIRCH RUN TOWNSHIP SAGINAW COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE # ALARM SYSTEM ORDINANCE

CITY OF GRETNA, NEBRASKA ORDINANCE 804 AN ORDINANCE CREATING CHAPTER 10 BUSINESS REGULATIONS, ARTICLE 12, ALARM SYSTEMS; TO DEFINE ALARMS; REQUIRING

Town of York Alarm Systems Ordinance

Westerville, OH Code of Ordinances. CHAPTER 969 Alarm Systems

This chapter shall be known as the Burglar Alarm Ordinance of the City of Merced.

ARLINGTON COUNTY CODE. Chapter 33 SECURITY ALARMS*

BIRCH RUN TOWNSHIP SAGINAW COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO ALARM SYSTEM ORDINANCE AMENDMENT

Recommendation: The Chief of Police recommends adoption of the following ordinance:

ANN ARBOR CITY NOTICE ORDINANCE NO. ORD ALARM SYSTEMS

ORDINANCE NO. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKEWOOD,

EL PASO COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT ORDER REGULATING ALARM SYSTEMS

EXHIBIT A BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELLEVUE, NEBRASKA.

Public Notice of Amendment to New Shoreham General Ordinances Chapter 5 Fire Prevention and Protection New Article IV Fire Alarm Ordinance

Thomasville Municipal Code Chapter 12 PUBLIC SAFETY

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, false alarms waste valuable police resources; and. Sec Alarm Systems; regulation and response.

2430 Roman Forest Blvd. Ray Ricks Roman Forest, Texas Ordinance No. 215-A

Chapter 22 EMERGENCY SERVICES

Garden Grove Municipal Code Code Listing Basic Search Advanced Search City Home

Sec False alarms.

CHAPTER 8.24 BURGLAR ALARM SYSTEMS

Town of Bridgton FIRE PROTECTION AND LIFE SAFETY ORDINANCE

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT

CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KINGSTON. Ontario. By-Law Number A By-Law To Impose Fees For Automatic Alarms (False) False Alarm By-law

Pismo Beach, CA Municipal Code. Chapter 8.08 FIRE PREVENTION REGULATIONS

decision forwarded by the Commissioner of Education that had approved a settlement between

ALARM ORDINANCE ORDINANCE

BUILDING INSPECTION SAFETY PROGRAM MANUAL CHAPTER 5, REFERENCE # 1.4 August 1, 2009 OUT OF SERVICE (OOS) SPRINKLER AND STANDPIPE SYSTEMS

LEE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO

DECLARATORY STATEMENT. THIS CAUSE came on for consideration upon the Petition for Declaratory

ORDINANCE NO

Certificate of Occupancy Application Guidelines

Council of the City of York, PA Session 2008 Bill No. Ordinance No. INTRODUCED BY: Genevieve Ray DATE: November 18, 2008

CASE NO.: CVA

CHAPTER 4 POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE NO.

ALARM SYSTEMS ORDINANCE Town of Yarmouth, Maine Recodified: 1/15/98

CHAPTER 7 FIRE PREVENTION AND FIRE PROTECTION PART 1 OUTDOOR FIRES

Secure Residence Initiative ARLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME PREVENTION UNIT

R E S O L U T I O N. Single-Family Residence/ Church. 2,488 sq. ft. 2,488 sq. ft. Area Parking Required: Church

OPERATIONAL GUIDELINE. Office of the Fire Commissioner O.G.# Revision #1 TITLE: ISSUING ORDERS Page 1 of 8

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 2010 Legislative Session. Council Members Dernoga and Olson

MUNICIPALITY OF EAST HANTS BYLAW F-500 FIRE AND BURGLAR ALARM BYLAW A BYLAW IN AMENDMENT TO BYLAW 5-1 BURGLAR ALARM BYLAW

CHAPTER 2-7 FIRE PROTECTION AND PREVENTION. (Ordinance of ; Amended 9/7/95, 10/16/97, 9/23/99, 08/02//07, 12/17/15, 11/17/16)

BYLAW NO (CONSOLIDATED)

Austin Independent School District Police Department Policy and Procedure Manual

ORDINANCE NO. O FORMATTED FOR SOP THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF DOUGLAS, COLORADO

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF HALTON POLICE SERVICES BOARD BY-LAW

DAVIS POLICE DEPARTMENT

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL City of Chicago

SAFETY CODES COUNCIL ORDER. BEFORE THE FIRE TECHNICAL COUNCIL On June 21, 2012

City of Philadelphia

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

First Published in The Wichita Eagle on July 25, 2014 ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE

RULES OF THE TENNESSEE ALARM SYSTEMS CONTRACTORS BOARD CHAPTER GENERAL PROVISIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Advokatfirmaet BAHR AS - ENGAGEMENT TERMS

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION OF FIRE PREVENTION AND CONTROL

Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Prevention Bureau Standard

DECLARATORY STATEMENT. THIS CAUSE came on for consideration upon the Petition for Declaratory

CHAPTER LOCAL AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, 2000 EDITION SECTIONS

FIRE PREVENTION & PROTECTION CHAPTER 127 ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS

Fire Inspection Program

Chapter 100 FIRE PREVENTION

Regional District of Central Okanagan. Bylaw No.

ORDINANCE NO, 5907 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ALBANY MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER , UNIFORM FIRE CODE

TITLE 20 MISCELLANEOUS CHAPTER 1 AIRCRAFT REGULATIONS

City of ^ENUS ORDINANCE NO

PART II - MANATEE COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES Chapter MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS AND OFFENSES ARTICLE IV. - ALARM SYSTEMS

WHEREAS, responding to false alarms may endanger the public health, safety,

Chapter 6 -- FIRE PROTECTION AND PREVENTION* BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION means the fire department of the city.

JURISDICTIONAL ASSIGNMENT PLAN of the ALBERTA CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY DECISION OF THE UMPIRE REVIEW OF CONTRACTOR S WORK ASSIGNMENT

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA. SCHAEFER ENTERPRISES, INC. Petitioner, CASE NO DOR FOF

Request for Proposals (RFP) for: Columbia County Facilities Fire Detection and Security Improvements

BYLAW 5542 *******************************************************************************

IOWA STATE FIRE MARSHAL DIVISION Attn: Licensing Administrator

IMPORTANT SAFETY RECALL

ORDINANCE CHAPTER 16 ARTICLE IV OUTDOOR WOOD FURNACES

Planning Commission Report

- INVITATION - COURTESY INFORMATIONAL MEETING

BY-LAW NUMBER of - THE CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF BRANT. To Regulate Open Air Burning

Transcription:

IN THE MATTER OF THE GOSPEL FAITH MISSION INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF CHANGE, BALTIMORE 10610 LIBERTY ROAD RANDALLSTOWN, MD 21133 RE: Appeal of False Alarm fees BEFORE THE BOARD OF APPEALS OF BALTIMORE COUNTY CASE NO: CBA-18-001 OPINION This case comes before the Baltimore County Board of Appeals as a de novo hearing on an appeal of the decision of the Baltimore County Alarm Reduction Section's findings that the Gospel Faith Mission International House of Change, Baltimore ("Gospel Faith Mission") located at I 0610 Liberty Road were to be held responsible for a total of 29 false alarms from March 6, 2017 to June 10, 2017 with a total charge of $5,925.00. The Alarm Reduction Section made an. adjustment of$1,500.00 with a total of $375.00 being paid by the Protestants, with an outstanding fine amount of $4,050.00. A hearing took place before this Board on September 27, 2017 with members of the Gospel Faith Mission appearing prose. Renee Phillips Farley, Esquire appeared on behalf of Baltimore County. Background On June 22, 2017, Steven R. Heggemann, Manager of the Alarm Reduction Team Baltimore County, issued a letter to the Gospel Faith Mission at I 0610 Liberty Road, Randallstown, Maryland 21133 outlining his decision regarding the review of the false alarm fees attributed to that address pursuant to hearing number 16466. The nature of these violations entail the security system at I 0610 Libe1iy Road being triggered, thus causing the church's security alarm provider to notify the Baltimore County Police which then is required to respond to the premises in order to investigate the existence of possible criminal activity. Each time one of these

notifications is triggered causing Baltimore County Police to respond and not find evidence of criminal activity, a false alarm notice is generated and sent to the appropriate address provided by the Gospel Faith Mission. Mr. Heggemann, manager ofthe Alarm Reduction Team testified before the Board and explained that Baltimore County Police are required to make note of the fact that no criminal activity has been detected after responding to a call. When such note is made, a false alarm notice is then generated. Mr. I-Ieggemann explained that he then reviews the records and in instances where officers fail to provide the proper information, credit is then given to the prope1ty owners and the charges removed. Mr. Heggemam1 also explained that when an alam1 is tripped, a phone call is made by the security firm to a number provided by the customer in which they have an opportunity to communicate whether or not a false alarm has been tripped. Whether or not this communication is successfully completed is between the customer and the security system provider. Once the Baltimore County Police are forced to respond to the address and no criminal activity detected, a fine is automatically accrued. Deacon Moses Kuna of the Gospel Faith Mission International testified before the Board outlining the reasons for which they have appealed. Mr. Kuna explained that the original false alarm notification letters were addressed to 9915 Liberty Road which was the address of a former pastor who has been deceased since 2016. Deacon Kuna explained that these notifications came to the attention to the chnrch but only after they were forwarded on by the deceased pastor's family members. Deacon Kuna also explained that their security alarm provider, ADT had been to the premises to repair problems to the secnrity alarm sensors. Mr. Kuna presented the Board with a work order summary dated June 5, 2017, outlining the problems found with the system. Deacon Kuna attributed the large amounts of false alarms instances to ADT's failure to properly diagnose 2

and to remedy the defects in their alann system. Deacon Kuna notes that since the system has been fixed that the false alarms have ceased Decision The Baltimore County Code defines Public Nuisance Alarms as follows: 13-11-101. DEFINITIONS (a) In general. In this subtitle the following words have the meanings indicated. (b) Person. "person" includes a lessee. (c) Public nuisance alarm. "Public nuisance alarm" means a residential, commercial, or automotive burglary or robbery alarm system with an audible noise enunciator including horns, bells, or sirens that sounds between the hours of: (1) I 0:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. and continuously sounds for more than 2 hours; or (2) 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. and continuously sounds for more than 4 hours. The statutory penalties for Public Nuisance Alarms are as stated below. 13-11-102. PUBLIC NUISANCE ALARMS PROHIBITED. (a) Prohibited. A person may not allow a public nuisance to be maintained on the person's property or in the person's vehicle. (b) Penalty. A person who violates this section is subject to a civil penalty of not less than $50 and exceeding $500 for each offense. Deacon Moses Kuna testified that the Gospel Faith Mission was unaware that fines were outstanding with Baltimore County due to false alarms at the church because the previous Deacon had died and notifications of these fines were being sent to the deceased Deacon's address. These notices included false alarms from March 10, 2017 to April 22, 2017, for total of $2,550. (See Appellant's Ex. 2). Starting on May 2, 2017, notices were being sent to the 10610 Liberty Road 3

address. Although the Board does not question the Appellant's explanation for the "mix -up" regarding the proper address, the Board finds that it is still the legal responsibility of the Church to insure that the proper address for such notifications has been supplied to the County. In that the Alarm Reduction Section has already afforded the Appellants a $1,500.00 adjustment, the Board is not inclined to make fmiher reductions due to for lack of notice. Appellants testified they believed that false alarms were being generated by malfunctioning security equipment provided by ADT, which possibly being triggered by rodents. Appellants provided a work order from ADT dated June 5, 2017 illustrating their efforts to prevent future false alarms. (See Appellant's Ex. 1). Appellants further testified it took ADT multiple attempts to diagnose the problem. Consequently, another $500.00 fine was generated as a result of a June 10, 2017 false alarm. Although the Board finds that it is the ultimate responsibility of the prope1iy owner (the Church) to insure that their security equipment is functioning properly, the Board finds that the Appellants made good faith effmis to remedy the problem with their security equipment once the problem was diagnosed. Based on these good faith effmis, the Board will reduce the previous fine amount of $4,050.00 by $500.00, making the total fine due, $3,550.00 Therefore, the decision of the Alarm Reduction Section is upheld and the civil penalty is reduced to $3,550.00. ORDER THEREFORE, IT IS THIS 6 day of_~;j~f-~t".~m~w~----' 2017 by the Board ofappeals of Baltimore County ORDERED that the decision of the Alarm Reduction Section is AFFIRMED and the civil penalty is REDUCED by $500.00 from $4,050.00 to $3,550.00. 4

Any petition for judicial review from this decision must be made in accordance with Rule 7-201 through Rule 7-210 of the Maryland Rules. BOARD OF APPEALS OF BALTIMORE COUNTY

~lonrb nf J\ppcnls nf ~nltimnrc @nunty JEFFERSON BUILDING SECOND FLOOR, SUITE 203 105 WEST CHESAPEAKE AVENUE TOWSON, MARYLAND, 21204 410-887-3180 FAX 410-887 -3182 December 5, 2017 Renee Phillips-Farley, Assistant County Attorney Deacon Moses Kuna Baltimore County Office oflaw The Gospel Faith Mission International The Historic Courthouse, Second Floor House of Change, Baltimore 400 Washington Avenue 10610 Liberty Road Towson, Maryland 21204 Randallstown, Mmyland 21133 RE: In the Matter of: The Gospel Faith Mission International House ofchange, Baltimore Case No.: CBA-18-001 Dear Ms. Phillips-Fm'ley and Deacon Kuna: Enclosed please find a copy of the final Opinion and Order issued this date by the Board of Appeals of Baltimore County in the above subject matter. Any petition for judicial review from this decision must be made in accordance with Rule 7-201 through Rule 7-210 of the Maryland Rules, WITH A PHOTOCOPY PROVIDED TO THIS OFFICE CONCURRENT WITH FILING IN CIRCUIT COURT. Please note that all Petitions for Judicial Review filed from this decision should be noted under the same civil action number. If no such petition is filed within 30 days from the date of the enclosed Order, the subject file will be closed. Very truly yours, 4td,~/'7- Krysundra "Sunny" Cannington Administrator KLC/taz Enclosure Duplicate Original Cover Letter c: Steven R. Heggemann, Manager of Alarm Reduction Team/OBF Michael E. Field, County Attorney/Office oflaw