Purpose and Relationship to GMA. Planning Area Profile

Similar documents
Historic Preservation Element

TABLE OF CONTENTS HISTORIC PRESERVATION ELEMENT I. INTRODUCTION HP. A. Purpose HP B. Assessment and Conclusions...

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES POLICIES

WHEREAS, a number of these buildings are potentially historic structures;

2018 Northampton Township Comprehensive Plan

Chapter 9. Historic Preservation Element

C h a p t e r 3 E V A L U A T I O N A N D D E S I G N A T I O N. Background

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

Municipal Comprehensive and Open Space Plans

CITY OF GENEVA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 22 S. FIRST STREET GENEVA, ILLINOIS 60134

Chapter LANDMARKS AND HISTORIC SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICTS A.120 Enforcement A.130 Severability. Tacoma Municipal Code

Chapter 6 cultural heritage

Intergovermental Coordination

Urban Design and Preservation Element

Shelton View / Meridian /

COMMUNITY DESIGN. GOAL: Create livable and attractive communities. Intent

Provide and maintain sufficient public parks, recreation facilities, and open space to meet the recreational needs of County residents and visitors.

Table L-1 Summary Action Strategy. Action Item Timing Status Responsible Agency

SECTION II SECTION II STATEMENT OF GOALS, OBJECTIVES, PRINCIPLES, ASSUMPTIONS, POLICIES AND STANDARDS

Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

a) buildings, structures and artifacts of historical significance;

l D. The proposed amendments to the GPP are consistent with and advance the 2 Countywide Planning Policies (CPP), in particular:

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

Draft Historic Preservation Vision, Goals, and Policies

Steering Committee Meeting

HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Chapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS

Purpose of the Master Plan

Purpose of the Master Plan

ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES POLICIES

Kinzie Industrial Corridor

2018 WORK PLAN. Land Use & Ethics Training presented by: Assistant City Attorney, Natasha Zimmerman

LAND USE ELEMENT. Purpose. General Goals & Policies

Historic Resources. HORIZON Historic Resources

STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2013, or take other action as deemed appropriate.

San Francisco General Plan Preservation Element: Objectives 7-9. Historic Preservation Commission August 20, 2014

Illustration of Eastlake Farmer s Cooperative Grain Elevator. Chapter 5: implementation 5-1

7-1. Chapter 7: Historic Preservation. 7.0 Accomplishments since Introduction. New Castle County 2012 Comprehensive Plan

Plan-It Greenville (2009) Comprehensive Plan 5-Year Update

The City shall enhance and improve the accessibility of parks and recreational facilities while protecting their quality. by:

ABOUT HISTORIC DISTRICTS

Incentive Zoning Regulations Florida Municipal City of Orlando

CITY OF DES MOINES LANDMARK REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Tuesday, June 13, 2017

Riparian Buffer on the Bushkill Creek. Policies

FDOT D4 Complete Streets

CHAPTER 5: IMPLEMENTING THE 2030 PLAN

This page intentionally blank.

Goal 1 To establish and follow land use patterns for the long-range development of the campus.

OFFICIAL CONTROLS IMPLEMENTATION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

Planning Districts INTRODUCTION

IMPLEMENTING SOMERSET COUNTY S INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK

Sound Transit 3. Appendix A: Detailed Description of Facilities and Estimated Costs

implementation10 Village of Greendale Comprehensive Plan: Greendale, Wisconsin. Revisiting a Greenbelt Community

I. STAFF POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS. The following RMP policy strategies are proposed by staff in support of a Scenic Resource Protection Program:

5.0 Historic Resource Survey

City of Kingston Heritage Commemoration Program Guidelines: 7 May 2010

Shared Responsibility for Cultural Resource Protection: Preservation Partnerships that Work. Kiana Lodge Clearwater Casino Resort Suquamish, WA

Arlington, Virginia is a worldclass

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA CHECKLIST OPEN SPACE CLASSIFICATION

16. KING-SPADINA SECONDARY PLAN

CONCLUSION AND IMPLEMENTATION

1INTRODUCTION. Purpose of the Truckee Railyard Master Plan

Planning Department. Director of Planning. Manager of Planning. Planning Technician/ Sustainability Coordinator. Planner II/ Heritage Coordinator

LU Encourage schools, institutions, and other community facilities that serve rural residents to locate in neighboring cities and towns.

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 5I

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

CHAPTER 9. Community Character

RECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND GREENWAYS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT

Olde Towne Vision Plan

Provincial Heritage Places Recognition Program

Erik Rundell, Project Manager

Pine Street Waterfront Overlay CITY OF ROSEBURG PINE STREET WATERFRONT OVERLAY FEBRUARY City of Roseburg

DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4

707 HISTORIC LANDMARK (HL), HISTORIC DISTRICT (HD), AND HISTORIC CORRIDOR (HC)

Kinzie Industrial Corridor

Comprehensive Plan. Faribault, Minnesota. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Claybaugh Preservation Architecture Inc. Howard R. Green Company Bonz/REA

Draft Stillwater 2030 Comprehensive Plan- Goals and Policies

Laberge Group. Town of Coeymans. Draft Comprehensive Plan. Overview of Planning Process

LIVEABLE. A diverse and welcoming capital city with an enviable lifestyle and strong community. Liveable City of Adelaide Strategic Plan

TEMPLE MEDICAL & EDUCATION DISTRICT

Functional Areas of Practice AICP EXAM REVIEW. February 20, 2009 Georgia Tech Student Center

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Planned Manufacturing District Review

Historic Yonge Street HCD Plan Community Consultation October 14, 2015

CHAPTER 2 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES

HISTORIC PRESERVATION

WATERFORD Plan of Preservation, Conservation and Development Supplement Part 1 - Policy Element

SDOT DPD. SDOT Director s Rule DPD Director s Rule DCLU DR SED DR of 7 CITY OF SEATTLE

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PANEL. Graniteville TAP: Developing a Community Vision

Chapter 11. Implementation Plan

Appendix E Memorandum of Agreement between FHWA and the SHPO

Cumberland County Preservation Opportunities Watch List 2018 Nominations

The West Vaughan Employment Area Secondary Plan Policies

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES. In This Chapter. Goals & Strategies 182 Project List 183 Future Land Use 186 CHAPTER 11 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

Fredericksburg Historic Resources Survey

Transcription:

Purpose and Relationship to GMA The Growth Management Act does not require a, but the Act contains a goal which calls for jurisdictions to "Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures that have historical or archaeological significance". However, as a Certified Local Government (CLG), historic preservation is an integral part of the City of Bothell s land use planning policy. The City s CLG status was granted by the National Park Service in 1988. The CLG Program seeks; 1) to develop and maintain local preservation programs that will influence the zoning and permitting decisions critical to preserving historic properties; and 2) to ensure the broadest possible participation of local governments in the national historic preservation program while maintaining preservation standards established by the Secretary of the Interior. Historic structures contribute substantially to a city's quality of life and its residents' sense of community. In a very practical way, older housing and commercial buildings represent an investment by previous generations upon which today's generations can capitalize. Costly new construction is not required when an existing structure can be adapted to a new use, and the older structure lends a sense of stability and character to its surroundings. Historic preservation supports other goals of the Act as well, including preservation of the existing housing stock, reduction of sprawl and achievement of GMA goals within the fiscal and natural resource capabilities of the community. Planning Area Profile The City performed a comprehensive historic resources inventory in 1988 which surveyed sites and structures 50 years old or older for the purpose of identifying any of potential historic significance to the community. The City utilizes this inventory to help identify potential register properties and to assist with reviewing demolition permit applications. The inventory is updated on a regular basis, as resources allow, and is linked to the State of Washington s historic resources database. A number of structures on the Bothell historic inventory add great character to their neighborhoods, providing diversity of style and materials. Their survival provides a sense of stability and continuity to these neighborhoods as well. Not all of the structures or sites inventoried, however, are "historically significant" according to criteria for submitting nominations to the National, State or Local Registers. Many more historic structures and sites are locally significant due to their close association with early Bothell settlers, their uniqueness of architecture style in Bothell or their contribution to and representation of community values and history. The Landmark Preservation Board will identify and bring forward for City Council consideration those properties contained in the inventory which are felt to be historically significant for listing on the City's Local Register of Historic Landmarks. Figure HP-1 shows historic register properties within the Planning Area. HP-1

As of the end of 2014, 14 properties have been placed on the State Register of Historic Places; nine properties have been listed on the National Register of Historic Places; and 15 properties have been placed on the local register. The total number of properties on the combined national, state and local registers is 22. Development of Goals, Policies, and Actions The following goals, policies and actions were developed initially by the Landmark Preservation Ordinance which established the City's historic preservation program in 1987 (Ord. 1258, 1987, later re-codified under Ord. 1635, 1996). In 1988 the City was also designated a Certified Local Government. Some additional policies and actions were added in mid-1991 and these goals, policies and actions were formally established as the City s with adoption of the Imagine Bothell Comprehensive Plan in 1994. The Element was updated in 2004 and 2015. HP-2

Historic Preservation Goals, Policies and Actions Goals HP-G1 HP-G2 HP-G3 HP-G4 HP-G5 HP-G6 HP-G7 To honor Bothell s past and provides a perspective for its future by preserving significant historic buildings and archaeological properties and other links to the City's past To safeguard the heritage of the City as represented by those buildings, districts, objects, sites and structures which reflect significant elements of the City's history. To foster civic and neighborhood pride in the beauty and accomplishments of the past and a sense of identity based on the City's history. To stabilize or improve the aesthetic and economic vitality and values of such sites, improvements and objects. To assist, encourage and provide incentives to private owners for preservation, restoration, redevelopment and use of outstanding historic buildings, districts, objects, sites and structures. To promote and facilitate the early identification and resolution of conflicts between preservation of historic and archaeological resources and alternative land uses. To conserve valuable material and energy resources by ongoing use and maintenance of the existing buildings. Policies HP-P1 HP-P2 HP-P3 HP-P4 Promote the preservation of buildings, sites, objects, and districts which have historic significance for the community through a combination of incentives, regulations and informational activities. In promoting expansion of the federal, state and local historic registers, assign the highest priority to those buildings, sites, objects and districts which appear most threatened by development. Public dollars shall not be used to cause the demolition of a property deemed to be historically significant and/or eligible for the local, state or national registers when a physically feasible alternative exists. Properties listed on the City's historic resources inventory shall be evaluated to determine their significance on a case-by-case basis at the time of a development or redevelopment proposal or demolition application. Encourage exploration of alternatives to the demolition of buildings and objects found to be historically significant or otherwise deemed to be eligible for the local, state or national registers HP-3

to accommodate private or public sector proposals. Examples of such alternatives include (in descending order of preference): 1. Redesigning the project to avoid the impact if physically feasible; 2. Incorporating the structure or site into the overall design of a project; 3. Encouraging adaptive reuse of the structure or site; 4. Relocating the structure(s) on the property; 5. Relocating the structure to another property within the city of Bothell or its planning area; or 6. King and Snohomish County; or 7. Washington State; 8. Salvaging from the structure historically significant architectural features and building materials. 9. Documenting the structure as a whole and its individual architectural features in photographs, drawings, and/or text. Such documentation shall be submitted to, and archived by the city. HP-P5 HP-P6 HP-P7 HP-P8 HP-P9 HP-P10 Ensure that adequate time is allowed prior to any demolition approval to pursue the above alternatives. In the event that no alternative to demolition is found after a good faith effort, demolition of historic buildings and objects will not be allowed prior to issuance of a City building permit. Work with residents and property owners to establish historic districts in areas where historic properties exist or where an area represents a significant connection to Bothell's past. In the review process for proposed development applications which contain or are near lands which contain historic resources, address the historic context in which a property may exist, especially with regard to scale, bulk and neighborhood compatibility. Work with Snohomish County to ensure consistency with the City s historic preservation efforts within the Municipal Urban Growth Area. Incorporate into subdivision review the identification and planning for the preservation of archaeological resources, particularly archaeological sites in river and stream corridors. Actions HP-A1 HP-A2 As resources allow, update the historic survey and property inventory. Require consideration of alternatives to demolition of historic structures when redevelopment proposals are received, in accordance with existing regulations. HP-4

HP-A3 HP-A4 HP-A5 The Landmark Preservation Board shall develop and publicize educational programs and visual aids to provide information to the public concerning Bothell's Landmark Preservation Program and historic preservation within the community. Notify all owners of historic properties identified in the Bothell Historic Survey of the local, state and federal register programs. Continue to implement and improve incentives to encourage the preservation or adaptive reuse of properties identified in the Bothell Historic Survey and Property Inventory. Such incentives may include, but are not limited to: Special use valuation for the rehabilitation of historic landmarks, pursuant to Washington State Revised Codes; Current use valuation for properties held in uses below their "highest and best use" for the purposes of preserving their historic character; Discounted user fees for City services for historic properties; Flexibility in building code requirements to accommodate the historic nature of structures so long as the health, safety, and welfare of the public is preserved; Rezoning to allow a more economically attractive adaptive reuse. HP-A6 HP-A7 HP-A8 HP-A9 Continue applying different levels of review or regulation based on different classes of historic significance. Pursue an interlocal agreement with Snohomish County 1 regarding historic preservation within the portions of the Planning Area which fall within Snohomish County s jurisdiction. Investigate and bring forth for Landmark Preservation Board, Planning Commission and City Council consideration the establishment of a historic structure relocation and facade improvement fund for the purposes of providing grants, revolving loans or easement purchases to protect significant and threatened properties. Investigate and bring forth for Landmark Preservation Board, Planning Commission and City Council consideration possible incentives for the preservation of archaeological resources. HP-A10 Develop a recognition/award program for groups or individuals who contribute to the preservation of notable buildings, sites, objects, or districts associated with key events and individuals. Criteria for this program would need to be developed by the Landmark Preservation Board in order to complement the existing Historic Register nomination process. HP-A11 Refine those Landmark Preservation implementing regulations which initiate consideration of a local historic register listing for any nomination to the state or national historic registers. 1 Since the City annexed the remaining portions of its Potential Annexation Area (PAA) in King County in 2014, no such interlocal is required with King County. HP-5

9 AVE SE 30 DAMSON RD Unincorporated Snohomish County Uninco i rrpo rra tted Snohomish i Coun tty SR 524 (FILBERT RD) Lynnwood nwood LOCUST WAY LOGAN RD DAMSON RD FILBERT DR 524 9 SR 527 (BOTHELL-EVERETT HWY) 527 196 ST SE (GRANNIS RD) 524 YORK RD JEWEL RD 39 AVE SE MALTBY RD (SR 524) 212 ST SE Brier err Swam p Creek 14 AVE W CARTER RD 228 ST SW 4 AVE W 216 ST SW 224 ST SW MERIDIAN AVE S 216 ST SE 4 AVE SE I 16 BOTHELL-EVERETT HWY 15 AVE SE 527 19 AVE SE 20 AVE SE 232 ST SE 220 ST SE North Creek 228 ST SE I- 23 AVE SE 23 DR SE 223 ST 26 PL SE SE DR I- SE 29 DR SE FITZGERALD 31 AVE SE RD Nort h Creek 220 ST SE 15 35 AVE SE 35 AVE SE 39 AVE SE 228 ST SE 45 AVE SE 240 ST SW 240 ST SE 2 240 ST SE LOCKWOOD RD 7 AVE SE 39 AVE SE Q:\Apps\GIS\Map_Products\Comp\2014-15\AN1_BothellAnnexationArea.mxd 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Beckstrom Cabin (L,S) Hannan House (L,S) Bothell's First Schoolhouse (L,S) Lytle House (L) Bates-Tanner Farm (S,N) Red Brick Highway (L,S) Burrows House (L) Chase House (S, N) Faust-Ryan House (S, N) Skirving House (L, S) Kirk House (S, N) North Creek Schoolhouse (L, S, N) Bothell Pioneer Cemetery (L, S, N) Sorenson House (S, N) W.A. Anderson School (L) Thornton House (S, N) Wayne Curve Bridge (L) Winningham Farm House (S, N) Bartelson House (L) Roberts House (L) Ford Model A Fire Truck (L) Swedish Cemetery (L) P.A.B.L. = Park at Bothell Landing L= Bothell Historic Register, S = State Historic Register, N = National Historic Register Historic Register Properties Planning Area Boundary Line Bothell City Limits (2015) Brier, Kenmore, Kirkland, Lynnwood, or Woodinville 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Feet Miles The City of Bothell delivers this data (map) in as-is condition. GIS data (maps) are produced by the City of Bothell for internal purposes. No representation or guarantee is made concerning the accuracy, currency, or completeness of the information provided. NE 180 88 AVE NE ST NE 190 ST NE 185 ST Kenmore SIMONDS RD NE 92 AVE NE BOTHELL WAY NE NE 191 ST 13 3 96 AVE NE 8 19 NE 188 ST 12 522 NE 200 ST P.A.B.L. 1 11 4 14 WAY NITA WAY NE 100 AVE NE NE 190 ST 17 NE 195 ST NE 185 ST MAIN ST NE 145 ST 6 104 AVE NE 104 AVE NE 7 Kirkland 105 AVE NE 10 18 SR 522 NE 164 PL 522 112 PL NE E 112 AVE NE N orth Creek 5 RIVERSIDE JUANITA-WOODINVILLE WAY NE DR I- NORTH I- CREEK PKWY NE 195 ST RD BRICKYARD 120 AVE NE 522 WOODINVILLE DR NE 160 ST NE HOLLYHILLS 124 AVE NE DR DRNE ILLS HOLLYH NE NE 180 ST 192 PL Woodinville E 130 AVE NE 129AVE N NE 182 PL Woodinville Imagine Bothell...Comprehensive Plan Figure HP-1 Historic Register Properties (2015)