Chapel Hill Historic District Commission MILES RESIDENCE. Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness 240 Glandon Drive PIN

Similar documents
ST. ANDREWS HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOOD OVERLAY DESIGN STANDARDS

Morgan s Subdivision Historic District Character-defining Features

Resolution : Exhibit A. Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

Baker Historic District

Residential Design Guidelines

Historic District Commission

Historic District Commission Staff Report November 4 th & 18 th, 2015

Historic District Commission

Duplex Design Guidelines

DRAFT APPENDIX C. COMMON RESIDENTIAL STYLES IN THE SNOHOMISH HISTORIC DISTRICT Era of construction and architectural characteristics

Historic District Commission

The NWX Colonial Revival Style

1 of 1 1/31/2016 2:49 PM

Historic District Commission Staff Report May 3 rd, 2017

Housing and Coach House Guidelines - Ladner

FORM B BUILDING MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION MASSACHUSETTS ARCHIVES BUILDING 220 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS

Walnut Creek Transit Village Design Guidelines. Part Three III - 25

WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES

13. New Construction. Context & Character

Historic Preservation DESIGN GUIDELINES

Chapter 11. Exterior Design Factors. Introduction. House design does not stop once room arrangements are determined

Historic District Commission Staff Report September 7 th 2016

Historic District Commission Staff Report March 2 nd, 2016

Historic District Commission Staff Report February 1 st, 2017

Ottawa Historic Resources Inventory: Commercial Historic District Building Information. Significance and Potential Eligibility

KEY MAP DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREA MAP. Sunnymede North Sub-Area Plan

Westboro Neighborhood Conservation District Westboro Homeowners Association

Gateway Corridor Standards

2.6 City Centre District Site Specific Design Recommendations

Part 3 TYPE: BUNGALOW. 1910s 1930s

4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon

City of Bellingham. Multifamily Residential Design Handbook

PROPOSED WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS

TULSA PRESERVATION COMMISSION COA SUBCOMMITTEE STAFF REPORT

MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES Site Plan and Design Review Principles Checklist

WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS

Gateway Corridor Standards

FINAL DRAFT. Building 77

Tazewell Pike. Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District Design Guidelines

Multi family Residential Development Permit Area

Architectural Inventory Form (page 1 of 5)

DOWNTOWN FACADE GUIDELINES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

HOMEWOOD. Architectural Style Guide

KNOXVILLE HISTORIC ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION

EXCELSIOR SPRINGS HISTORIC RESOURCES 10

Design Guidelines. High Point Estates Design Guidelines April Gomberoff Bell Lyon Architects Group Inc.

COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES MANUAL

FINAL DRAFT. Building 59

14825 Fruitvale Ave.

HOMEOWNER S ENHANCEMENT GUIDE. Chapter 2: The Ranch

History of the Foundation Buildings and Landscapes

CENTRAL CITY NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

THE AVENUES HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT STUDY BUILDING INVENTORY SHEET

Design Guidelines - 1 -

Site Planning. 1.0 Site Context. 2.0 Pedestrian Circulation Systems. Pag e 2-23

BOULEVARD AND PARKWAY STANDARDS

Chapel Hill Historic District Certificate of Appropriateness Application

CHAPTER 6 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR INDIVIDUAL BUILDING ELEMENTS. Commercial Facades

DOWNTOWN TRANSCONA URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

New Street Proposed Redevelopment Architecture & Urban Design Brief

BUILDING PROJECT QUESTIONNAIRE. GENERAL Do you want an open floor plan or a traditionally divided floor plan? How large is the home you envision?

Del Paso Heights Residential and Commercial Design Guidelines. Del Paso Heights Redevelopment Area and Design Review District

To receive Tax Abatement, structures must comply with the Green Building Standard.

FAÇADE DESIGN GUIDE. A Placemaking Initiative of the City of Richmond Department of Planning & Development Review

ARTICLE 8 DESIGN STANDARDS

14.0 BUILT FORM DESIGN CRITERIA

\\ Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan. Design Guidelines

Chapter 5: Mixed Use Neighborhood Character District

THE PRESERVE PHASE THREE URBAN DESIGN BRIEF. Second Submission: March 7, 2016

Community Design & Guidelines. Ooltewah, Tennessee

Carter Oaks 9700 Cragmont Drive, Richmond, VA Represented by Richard Bower (804) Joyner Fine Properties

City of Vaughan Urban Design Guidelines for Infill Development in Established Low-Rise Residential Neighbourhoods

Town of Essex Urban Design Guidelines for Downtown Harrow and Essex Centre May 2014

GUIDELINES REPLACEMENT HOUSING GUIDELINES LOCATION INTRODUCTION URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Cha p t e r 2: Ge n e r a l De s i g n Gu i d e l i n e s

5.1 Site Plan Guidelines

Chapter PEDESTRIAN COMMERCIAL (PC) ZONING DISTRICT

II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

6. BUILDINGS AND SPACES OF HUMAN SCALE

SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines

Design Guidelines for a Mixed-Use Community. Prairie Trail Pattern Book

Resources Present: _x_building Structure Object Site District _X_Element of District Other:

Address: 302 West Main Street PIN: Plan: Rectangular Stories: 2 Original Owner: Roof Type: Flat

Regulating Plan. Beacon Island Amendment 3 April 1, 2013 Page 1 B C BUILDING HEIGHTS LAND USE GRAND TOTAL* 850

VIRGINIA BEACH HISTORICAL REGISTER NOMINATION/APPLICATION FORM

Glossary. Block Face The row of front façades, facing the street, for the length of. Addition New construction attached to an existing structure.

REPORT TO THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION

Replacement Cost Questionnaire

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW ORDINANCE DESIGN GUIDELINES DECEMBER 2000 PREPARED FOR THE MEREDITH PLANNING BOARD BY CHRISTOPHER P. WILLIAMS, ARCHITECTS

2.5 Walkways, Driveways, and Offstreet Parking: Guidelines

Learning ZoneXpress. by Kathryn Johnson Interiors, ASID

430 Birdie Rd. Lake of the Woods Special Feature Sheet

Design Guidelines Checklist

March 24, 2010 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Planner Kristine Gay

B E R O A R C H I T E C T U R E P L L C

Architectural Control Committee Promulgated Rules

DRAFTING III- ARCHITECTURAL

DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR: INTENSIVE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TOWNHOUSE AND ROWHOUSE

Transcription:

Chapel Hill Historic District Commission MILES RESIDENCE Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness 240 Glandon Drive PIN 9788871387 The Miles residence is a Cape Cod Revival structure located at 240 Glandon Drive. It is located on a large diamond shaped lot that lies between Glandon Drive and Ridge Lane (an alley) in the Ghimgoul Historic District. Building History This house and its grounds were originally built for Dr. S.G. Sanders in 1938. The house was purchased by Dr. Frank Porter Graham in the 1950's. It was purchased from the Graham heirs by Russell Glatz in the late 1970's and was purchased by Mike and Elston Miles in December of 2002. In 2003-2004 the Miles renovated the house and added a master bedroom, garage and family room. The home was built in 1938, was renovated in the 1970 s, again in the 1980 s and most recently in 2003-2004. The core house remains a one and a half-storey, five bay, wood frame Cape Cod with an attached garage on the east side and a screen porch with articulated columns on the west. The exterior was mixed brick and siding in the 1980 s and remains so. Dormers with windows are arranged across the front facade. The rear portion of the house is asymmetrical now and was asymmetrical when it was built. Originally the rear of the house had an offset enlargement for a maids room with a long single dormer above for a bathroom serving the main second floor bedrooms. Later a greenhouse addition was added that increased the asymmetry of the back. The greenhouse has been removed and the long dormer remains. A second garage was added (the first became heated and used for habitable space) and eventually the second garage also became heated and used as habitable space. In the 1980's the original wood siding was covered by vinyl siding. This vinyl siding has been removed and the wood siding restored. Upper windows are six over six panes and about 2' wide by 3' high. The lower windows are also six over six panes and are 2'-6" wide by 4' high. All are double-hung sash. Miles Residence-1

Many modifications have been done to the structure and it's architectural character has not remained intact. Characteristics of the site include mature vegetation and a topography that falls from Ridge Lane to Glandon Rd. The house occupies a slightly sloping portion of the site, with the back yard sloping up toward the Ridge Lane and developed into a mature landscaped area. Pictures of the existing house will be presented at your meeting. The entire new design for the house and grounds (as they appear today) were presented to, and approved by, the Chapel Hill Historic District Commission in 2003. Proposed work under this request The major work under this request includes adding a breakfast room of about 110 sq. ft. facing toward Ridge Lane, rearranging the front porch and entry elements, adding a stone privacy wall at an existing patio, adding stone pavers at the existing Ridge Lane guest parking area and adding a 40 paved walkway between the Ridge Lane guest parking and the house walkway. A- Breakfast Room Addition: We are intending to move existing exterior walls about 12 to infill an existing niche in the exterior skin of the building. By infilling this niche we are able to create a small breakfast room adjacent to the existing kitchen. Moving these walls will not have any effect on sideyard, frontyard or rearyard setbacks. The brick exterior and shingle roofing will match the existing. We will be re-using existing sash and the windows will match existing. Exterior trim will be continuous with existing. See the attached exterior elevations for a more detailed view. B- Front Door and Front Porch The front door faces north and opens into a ground floor stair landing. Because the door faces north and has no sidelights, the ground floor landing is almost always dark and without much natural daylight. We are proposing to remove the existing pilasters and thoroughly clean them. We are proposing to construct sidelights and a glazed eliptoid element over the door. Then we will replace the existing pilasters and reconstruct the short projecting roof to cover the Miles Residence-2

entry and bear on the re-positioned pilasters. Please see the Glandon Drive elevations to see the existing and the proposed elevations in more detail. The front stoop would be slightly enlarged to be compatible with this new entry. See the new stoop on the proposed site plan attached. The stoop would be constructed of brick and would match the existing in simplicity. C- 36 Stone Wall at patio. In 2003 we built a stone flagged patio outside the family room. This patio is at an elevation above Glandon Drive and is quite visible to Glandon Drive. The Miles would like to use this patio more fully and want to construct a 36 stone wall along the outside edge of the existing patio. No new paved area would be created. A stone retaining wall exists about 10 yards downhill from the patio and this new wall would match the existing stone retaining wall D- Ridge Lane Guest parking This home has always had a 3 or 4 car gravel parking area on Ridge Lane. Guests park at the Ridge Lane elevation and find their way down to the house. Because the parking area is gravel it is not always clear that it is on this lot and serves this house. The Miles would like to pave this parking area with stone pavers that match the existing pavers in their driveway. This way the parking area would appear associated with the house it serves. They would like to provide a paved path from the parking onto their driveway and back walkway for the convenience of their guests. Historic District Evaluation Criteria The following are the criteria used to judge appropriateness: a) The height of the building in relation to the average height of the nearest adjacent and opposite buildings The height of the addition is not higher than the existing roof of this home. No changes in building height are part of this proposal. Miles Residence-3

b) The setback and placement on the lot of the building in relation to the average setback and placement of the nearest adjacent and opposite buildings No changes are proposed to the front, side or rear setbacks. c) The exterior materials including texture and pattern. All new exterior materials (brick, and wood trim) will match existing. d) The architectural detailing, such as lintels, cornices, brick bond, and foundation materials Architectural detailing will match existing detailing. e) The roof shape, forms and materials The roof being added will be a small sloped roof, which is the form and shape of the existing roof. Roof materials will remain the same as existing. The existing building has varied roof forms and the additional roof forms are treated in the same waywith variety and smaller forms. 6) The proportion, shape, positioning and location, pattern and size of any elements of fenestration New fenestration will match existing. g) The general form and proportion of the building The form and proportion of this proposed addition is compatible with the existing building and consistent with cape cod style houses. These houses typically use gable ends, have shed roof additions and use dormers rather than second stories. They tend to stay close to the ground and spread horizontally rather than get vertical. h) The accessory fixtures and other features (including light fixtures, hardware, awnings, etc) No new exterior light fixtures will be used. i) the architectural scale in relation to existing structures and surrounding buildings. This work will not change the overall scale of this building - we have made a conscious effort to maintain the building scale when adding the space. Miles Residence-4

EXISTING NORTH ENTRANCE: MILES RESIDENCE - PHOTOGRAPHS : ENTRY AT 246 GLANDON WITH SIDELIGHT ENTRY AT 250 GLANDON WITH SIDELIGHTS AND FANLIGHT Miles Residence-1

STONE WALL AT GLANDON STONE WALL BELOW PATIO TIERED STONE WALL AT NEIGHBORING PROPERTY Miles Residence-2

EXISTING STONE PAVERS AT DRIVEWAY PAVERS AT PARKING AREA TO MATCH EXISTING SLATE WALKWAY PAVERS WALKWAY PAVERS AT NEW WALKWAY TO MATCH Miles Residence-3