NATICK COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN. Natick Center Outreach Meeting. After presentations about the Natick Master Plan process, town staff and

Similar documents
Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

THE CIVIC DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES

PINE CURVE REZONING. Property does not meet criteria for open space preservation and is not a candidate for a park

CHAPTER 3 VISION, GOALS, & PLANNING PRINCIPLES. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Vision Statement. Growth Management Goals.

A Vibrant Downtown. Chapter 5 Cary Public Art Opportunities 31

Downtown Cleveland Alliance/Tremont

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

City of Le Sueur DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN

DOWNTOWN NORFOLK COUNCIL ACTION PLAN. Strategic Initiatives Focus Area Objectives. Departmental Focus Area Key Objectives

38 Queen s University Campus Master Plan Part 1

SECTION II SECTION II STATEMENT OF GOALS, OBJECTIVES, PRINCIPLES, ASSUMPTIONS, POLICIES AND STANDARDS

Community Design Plan

Elm Street Business District: Streetscape and Signage Plan

About Momentum Midland

Introducing the Main Street Strategic Toolbox

WELCOME and introduction

REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER

Pedestrian and Bike Bridge LOGO

Study Area. Capitol Way. Greening America s Capitals 11/13/2014. A Greening America s Capitals Project

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

PINE CURVE REZONING. BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002

Welcome. Comprehensive Plan & Transportation Plan Open House November 7, 2012

Ivywild On The Creek PRELIMINARY CREEK DISTRICT MASTER PLAN

We are a determined group residents, industry, and government and by working together an incredible future lies ahead for Troy.

Sherri Ferguson. President/CEO Portland Chamber of Commerce. Tennessee Certified Economic Developer Capstone Project

Fifth and Detroit Street Design May 2017 Capital Improvements Committee. DOWNTOWN Street Design

Carlsbad Village Redevelopment Concept Summary of Features

Chicago Neighborhoods 2015: Assets, Plans and Trends A project of The Chicago Community Trust

Project Consulting Team:

P A I N E S V I L L E D O W N T O W N P L A N

Chapter 1: Introduction

Preservation Planning

The Project. In 2013, construction was completed between 100 Street and 102 Street.

hermitage town center

TOD 101 CREATING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES WITH TRANSIT

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

Pine Avenue Improvement Project

Illustration of Eastlake Farmer s Cooperative Grain Elevator. Chapter 5: implementation 5-1

FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

DOWNTOWN VISIONING FORUM AGENDA JUNE 5, 2014

urban design Introduction

ROBBINSDALE LRT STATION CDI DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

Schedule B to Report PLS

Hockessin Community Redevelopment Plan

Strategic plan framework Steering Committee Meeting

4- PA - LD - LIVELY DOWNTOWN. LD - Background

Table of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.

Port Lavaca Future Land Use

Community Design Guidelines. Port Wallace DRAFT

RESEDA - WEST VAN NUYS COMMUNITY PLAN

CHAPTER 7: VISION AND ACTION STATEMENTS. Noble 2025 Vision Statement

BRYN MAWR. Tier 2 Characteristics: Location: Lancaster Avenue from Old Lancaster Road on the east to Norwood Avenue on the west

Metro. Activity Center Design Guidelines. Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers

8implementation. strategies

THE POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR WALKABLE COMMUNITIES. Community Technical Assistance Program Building Active Communities Institute March 2016

A BLUEPRINT FOR BROCKTON A CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Courthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study. Courthouse Square Working Group #13 October 15, 2014

Draft Bergamot Area Plan

The Lincoln Neighborhood Corridor Plan. The LiNC

MAIN STREET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

Urban Design 9Identity

BROOKLYN PARK / 85TH AVE LRT STATION CDI DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES DRAFT

Welcome & Introductions

Hopkins. Development Guidelines May Overview. Sponsored by: Blake Road Corridor Collaborative City of Hopkins

Prepared for the Citizens of Forsyth County by the City-County Planning Board

Pentagon Centre (SP#297) Phase I Site Plan Amendments SPRC #3

Status Update (2006 vs. Now) Citizen s Advisory Committee February Plan for Prosperity

Coatesville Station Area Planning Work in Progress Meeting, August 19, 2010 STATION AREA PLANNING WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENTATION

PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA OCTOBER

7-PARKS, OPEN SPACE & PUBLIC ART

CHAPTER 6 URBAN DESIGN

City of Fort Lauderdale UPTOWN URBAN VILLAGE. Public Workshop December 7, 2016

Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel Meeting #3

BRYN MAWR. Tier 2 Characteristics: Location: Lancaster Avenue from Old Lancaster Road on the east to Norwood Avenue on the west

Robbinsdale LRT Station. CDI Development Guidelines. August Overview

Downtown North Las Vegas Demonstration Site Project. Project Update

... the real city lives on... Character Area 5: LOWER WASHINGTON

Engagement Summary Gastown Streets: Local Business Visioning Workshop

Executive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor

Goals AND Guiding principles

Johnson Street Bridge Public Realm Update

Town of Avon Village Center. A New Village Center for Avon October, 2015

In surveys, Dallas residents say what they want to change most

PIKE PINE RENAISSANCE: ACT ONE. October 19, 2017

Subregion 4 Central Avenue-Metro Blue Line Corridor Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Implementation Project. Community Meeting April 27, 2011

Somers Point Master Plan

Ship Creek Redevelopment

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW. Game Plan for a Healthy City

Shared Principles and Emerging Plan Directions

Anatomy of A Vibrant Downtown. Anatomy of a Vibrant Downtown

TOPIC AREA #1 SUSTAINABILITY, OPEN SPACE & CONSERVATION

Proposed Comprehensive Plan Strategies DRAFT for discussion June 28, 2017

Transportation. Strategies for Action

July 12, Columbus City Council City Hall 90 West Broad Street Columbus, OH RE: I-70/71 Columbus Crossroads Project

Activities for All Ages. Small Community Feel. Entertainment. Mix of Uses

FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project

Transcription:

Meeting Notes After presentations about the Natick 2030+ Master Plan process, town staff and consultants from Crosby, Schlessinger and Smallridge posed questions to the audience. Responses are cataloged below: 1. Question: What are the largest impediments to continued revitalization in Natick Center? Natick doesn t control enough land to make changes; Traffic congestion on main roads (Routes 27 & 135, Speen and Pond Streets) forces too many drivers through residential neighborhoods; Lack of sidewalks in the Center, especially around North Main Street; Lack of lighting near crosswalks on North Main Street, particularly around Pizza Plus and railroad bridge; Lack of good-quality signage for public and private properties; Amount of snow on sidewalks by intersections; Lack of child-friendly public spaces / infrastructure in Center, particularly around the Common. Area needs more playgrounds, picnic tables, water features, etc. that children can (and want) to use; Public restroom signage more public wayfinding signs to attractions and services; Lack of complimentary retail spaces existing commercial spaces in Center need to be better utilized;

The town needs to develop a reason for being for the Center. Consider bold, long-term investments, such as roofing Main Street and building underground parking garages; Natick should consider adopting the Community Preservation Act and participate in the Metropolitan Area Planning Council s Historic Heritage Program; Natick Center s cultural identity is as important as practical daily concerns. Embrace the area s history, local culture and environmental heritage; Maintain critical mass of commercial uses in the Center don t convert too much upper floor space into residential uses. Office and service uses critical for ground-floor shops and restaurants. 2. Question: What zoning issues should be considered/addressed in Natick 2030+? Building height encourage appropriate height in Natick Center to preserve a critical mass of downtown commercial space and business uses; Strike the correct ratio of retail/office/service/housing space in Natick s zoning by-law; Adopt increased parking requirements for new commercial project there is not enough parking in the Center for daytime office uses; Encourage change of uses in existing commercial properties, make it easy to convert older commercial/industrial spaces into new uses; Encourage more restaurants and parking; Natick s time has come pieces have come together. Revise zoning by-laws to foster appropriate development in the right locations to enhance Natick s character and communal spirit;

3. Question: Should more housing be encouraged to develop in Natick Center? More small, affordable homes should be developed for people over 50 in the Center; More affordable homes, including small and tiny homes are needed in the Center and throughout the Town; Consider what types of housing can be accommodated well in the Center versus other parts of town; Natick Center has a walking problem, not a parking problem; Supply of upper floor commercial space for offices and service providers needs to be maintained to help eateries and retailers at ground level; this requires day time parking; 4. Question: Are there any infrastructure improvements that would help with programming events in the Center? Improve Natick Center Commuter Rail station; Consider developing air rights over Commuter Rail line; Improve sidewalks around Natick Center; Improve public signage to make Center more friendly to pedestrians; Recognize the importance of pedestrians to the vitality of Natick Center; Town needs to coordinate short and long-term goals of different stakeholders: business owners, landlords and residents;

5. Question: What types of businesses and land uses are lacking in the Center? Why are they lacking? What can the Town do to attract them? Butcher shop; Grocery store (Trader Joe s); Independently-owned businesses; Wide range of restaurants (ethnic, affordable and serving fresh/healthy fare); More retail shops; 6. Question: How can the Natick 2030+ Master Plan be most helpful to business and property owners in Natick Center? Recommend actions to maintain/enhance the Center s unique character, encourage walkable, sensitive revitalization (maintain 50-60 height limits); Boost Natick Center s visibility, many new residents and visitors don t know of its existence; Recommend improvements that will provide people a reason to hang out and linger (constructively) in Natick Center; Encourage at least one pub and/or food trucks in the Center; Recommend comprehensive upgrades to the Common consider converting the southern quadrant into a paved plaza with seating, tables, games, etc; Recommend zoning techniques and strategic improvements to preserve the Center s authenticity, uniqueness and creative value and encourage people to Play and Stay in the area; Recommend zoning revisions to allow/encourage boutique hotel to locate in the Center;