Station Area Plan Introduction & Draft Alternatives Review

Similar documents
Community Meeting #1: Project Kick Off

Community Meeting #2.1

Citizen Advisory Committee Meeting #3.2

HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE. Gilroy Unified School District & Gilroy City Council September 24, 2018 Gilroy City Council Chambers, Gilroy, CA

Dumbarton Rail Corridor. Project Scoping Meeting Nov 15, :15 PM City of Newark Nov 16, :15 PM City of Menlo Park

Chapter 1.0 Introduction

Railyard Alternatives and I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study. MTA Board Meeting May 6, 2014

Bay Meadows Specific Plan Amendment - Phase II Overview. I. Phase II Overview. November 7, 2005 I - 1

DOMINION BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN A MODEL FOR CHESAPEAKE S FUTURE

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

3.0 Project Description

2. AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVMENT

Planning Charlotte s Future. Transportation & Planning Committee March 14, 2016

MAYFIELD WEST SECONDARY PLAN PHASE 2

The Role of Cities in Planning Transportation Megaprojects

Planning Charlotte s Future. Planning Committee June 21, 2016

Union Station Master Plan Task 3 Update

Key Concepts of the General Plan

Isabel Neighborhood Plan: Alternatives

1.0 PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED

Introduction and Overview

S C O P E O F W O R K A P R I L

PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE HURONTARIO-MAIN CORRIDOR SECONDARY PLAN

III. Design Principles

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 7, 2016

WEST OAKLAND SPECIFIC PLAN & DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

Description of Proposed Station Area Planning Project

UPDATE ON THE INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN. Citizen Advisory Group Meeting March 3, 2011

Department of Community Development. Planning and Environmental Review Division Revised Notice of Preparation

THE PLANNING AREA 2.1 PLANNING AREA LOCATION

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

ITEM #8. Regional Smart Growth Program. Regional Smart Growth Program. Presentation Overview. Coast Highway Vision and Stategic Plan.

Tonight s Agenda. Summary Presentation Open House. Group Discussion Next Steps: online community wide survey

Chapter 3 Project Description

Promoting Economic Development Through Upfront SEPA Review: Lessons from South Downtown Tacoma

HISTORIC TOWN CENTER MASTER PLAN CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION APRIL 3, 2012

MARINA BAY. City of Richmond Officer Bradley A. Moody Memorial Underpass. April 14, 2010

LAND USE MODEL UPDATE. Planning and Land Use Advisory Committee Meeting #2 September 4, 2014

PROJECT BACKGROUND. Preliminary Design Scope and Tasks

RESOLUTION NO. R Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension

Natomas Vision Plan and PLNP

PINE CURVE REZONING. Property does not meet criteria for open space preservation and is not a candidate for a park

TOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION

2. Form and Character. 2.1 Introduction. 2.2 The Downtown Addition Plan. 2.1 Introduction

I-84 Hartford Project Open Planning Studio #12. April 25, 2017

New Partners for Smart Growth Conference February 5, 2010

12/9/2013. HOLLYWOOD/PINES CORRIDOR PROJECT AMPO 2013 Annual Conference October 24, Our Perspective. Broward.

1 INTRODUCTION Purpose Project Background PROJECT CONTEXT Background The Capital City Downtown Plan...

Connecting Key Activity Centers with High Quality Bus Service

Potential Green Infrastructure Strategies May 6, 2015 Workshop

SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN. Planning Commission Study Session August 18, 2016

INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN

9IMPLEMENTATION AND PHASING

SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

NOTICE OF PREPARATION

Creating Complete Roadway Corridors:

112th Avenue Light Rail Options Concept Design Report JUNE 2010 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY TBG PGH

Preliminary Assessment of Transportation Issues Related to Proposed Casino at Gateway South

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Eric Angstadt, Director, Planning and Development

Stakeholders Advisory Working Groups (SAWGs) Smart Growth and TOD Land Use (#11) SAWG Meeting

Metro Orange Line Extension Four Years Early and $61 Million Under Budget

MAYFIELD WEST SECONDARY PLAN PHASE 2

Rock Spring Master Plan Community Meeting #6: Land Use + Transportation Forecasts

Portage Parkway Environmental Assessment Public Information Centre No. 1

Northwest Corridor LRT Line to Irving/DFW Public Meeting No. 1 Project Overview

Union Station Master Plan Task 2 Briefing

CHAIR AND MEMBERS CIVIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING ON JULY 17, 2017

Northwest Rail Corridor and US 36 BRT Development Oriented Transit Analysis 4.4 STATION AREA FINDINGS

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

Silver Line CPAM UPDATE. Transportation and Land Use Committee October 14, 2016

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

THE GREEN VISION WORKSHOP Friday, November 6, 2009

POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Gilroy High-Speed Train Station Visioning Project Vision Report March 2012

SOUTHWEST TRANSITWAY (STAGE 2) PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE

New land uses or changes to existing land uses in the Phase 1 area since certification of the FEIR and SEIR-1 are discussed below for each city.

DRAFT BELLEVUE COMMUNITY PLAN. City Council Study Session February 17, 2015

Planning for TOD Implementation at a Corridor Scale

4/8/2015 Item #10D Page 1

Subject: 2014 Regional Transportation Plan Amendment No. 1

Sub Area 2: Downtown Overland Park

New Rail Hubs along High Speed Rail Corridors The Urban Design Challenge

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Environmental Review Process

1INTRODUCTION. Purpose of the Truckee Railyard Master Plan

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

Transportation Committee

N Watt Avenue Corridor Plan. STOREFRONT WORKSHOP May 15-17, 2007

Rosecrans/Marquardt Grade Separation Project. Community Open House Meeting

Street Flooding Mitigation Plan KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission. Presented to AMPO National Conference October 18, 2017

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE TWO November 28, 2018

North Central Texas APA Transit-Oriented Development Seminar. Case Study City of North Richland Hills TOD. February 20, 2009

2 Project Description

DRAFT Civic Center Station Area Plan. Executive Summary

Dumbarton Transportation Corridor Study

Globemaster Corridor Specific Plan. Community Workshop

PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Providing a mix of housing options supporting a diversity of needs (800-1,600 sf 1-3 bd flats and Townhomes).

Public Meeting March 10 th 2011

The transportation system in a community is an

Building the transportation network we need for the future

Transcription:

Station Area Plan Introduction & Draft Alternatives Review City Council Meeting - February 22, 2016

Project Background: California High-Speed Rail San Jose to San Fernando Valley Segment CHSRA will select preferred alignment on completion of the EIR in late 2017 or early 2018 2014 Business Plan assumes that HSR will be in operation by 2026 Electrified Caltrain between San Francisco and San Jose (and potentially Gilroy) by 2020 3

Project Background: Visioning process High-Speed Train Visioning Project from 2011 to 2012 Evaluation two locations for a Gilroy HSR station and several options for the configuration of the alignment Identify the best possible station location and alignment City Council and community identified Downtown as the preferred station location and favored modified at-grade vertical alignment 4

Project Background: Downtown Gilroy Station Area Plan Funded by grant from CHSRA to study and plan for HSR Downtown Purpose to identify opportunities and issues created by future HSR station and tracks in Downtown Gilroy and mitigate impacts and maximize opportunities 5

Amendment of Downtown Specific Plan Most effects of HSR will occur Downtown Project will amend land use and transportation portions of Downtown Specific Plan and other plans, as needed 6

Alternative Land Use and Circulation Plans Overview Alternative Plans: Illustrate three different approaches to address opportunities and impacts of high-speed rail in Downtown Basis for Alternative Plans: Opportunities and Constraints report Input from Technical Advisory Committee and Citizen Advisory Committee Community input via stakeholder interviews and community meeting 2

Request and Recommendation Request: Review of Draft Alternative Land Use Scenarios to identify aspects that would not be favorably considered under any circumstances. Recommendation: If any aspects of any of the Scenarios would not be favorably considered, direct staff to remove those aspects from the draft alternative plans. Planning Commission Recommendation: Analyze Draft Alternatives, as presented. 3

Components of Alternative Land Use and Circulation Plans Land Use Elements Gateway treatment locations Fire Station locations Arts Center locations Parks/Plazas Increased building heights Transportation Elements HSR alignment (vertical modified at-grade v. aerial) HSR platform location Potential HSR long-term parking locations Potential Downtown parking locations Street closures or extensions Depressed streets Enhanced bike connections 4

Potential Changes Building heights could increase to 5 or 6 stories throughout the area and increase to 10 to 12 stories east of HSR and south of Old Gilroy St. Increases to the amount of residential, retail, office and hotel development, mostly south of 7 th St. / Old Gilroy St. Expansion of auto mall Public or mixed use development on west side of Swanston Ln. Alternative locations for Arts Center 5

Potential Changes Long-term HSR parking facilities east of HSR and south of Old Gilroy St. Possible closure of Railroad St. and some east-west street connections New underpasses and depression of cross streets where east-west vehicle access maintained Easterly extension of 1 st St. to Murray Ave. Extension of Chestnut St. over Miller Slough Aerial alignment of HSR tracks @ 30 35 ft. 6

Alternatives Buildout Projection SCENARIO 1. TRANSIT FOCUS SCENARIO 2. DOWNTOWN FOCUS SCENARIO 3. EMPLOYMENT FOCUS Phase 1 (by 2025) Housing: 500 units Commercial: 100,000 SF Class A office: 100,000 SF Hotel: 100 rooms Industrial: 50,000 SF Housing: 800 units Commercial:165,000 SF Class A office: 100,000 SF Hotel: 100 rooms Housing: 600 units Commercial: 200,000 SF Class A office: 100,000 SF Hotel: 100 rooms Phase 2 (by 2040) Housing: 1,900 units Commercial: 400,000 SF Class A office: 650,000 SF Hotel: 400 rooms Industrial: 50,000 SF Housing: 2,400 units Commercial: 490,000 SF Class A office: 200,000 SF Hotel: 300 rooms Housing: 1,600 units Commercial: 600,000 SF Class A office: 1.0 million SF Hotel: 1,400 rooms [1] Phase II includes Phase I development. Commercial development includes both retail and small offices, such as law firm offices. [2] Buildout projections are based on the market assessment prepared by BAE and the projections in the 2005 Downtown Specific Plan. 7

Scenario 1: Transit Focus High-intensity dev. focused within walking distance of the HSR station. Least effect on the remaining Downtown area. Modified at-grade HSR alignment would close one east-west vehicle access and may eliminate Railroad St. Depressed streets may affect access to adjacent properties. HSR parking structures at three locations near highway interchanges. 8

Scenario 2: Downtown Focus Mixed use residential dev. spread out along Monterey St. and around the HSR station. Retail dev. (supporting DT) extending along east-west streets on both sides of Monterey St. Aerial alignment of HSR allows all existing east-west street connections to remain. Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) remains at the current location at grade. HSR parking structures at two locations near highway interchanges. 9

Scenario 3: Employment Focus Office dev. and multifamily housing within walking distance of the HSR station. Enhanced commercial corridor along Monterey, extending south of 10 th St. Area south of 10 th St. reserved for future R&D and office dev., a hotel/conference center, and HSR parking. Modified at-grade HSR alignment would keep all east-west vehicle access, requiring new underpasses and depression of cross streets. 10

Next Steps March to May, 2016: Alternatives analysis June 2016: CAC meeting and Community meeting 11

Questions or Comments?

Backup slides

HSR Vertical Alignment Options Aerial Alignment refers to the high-speed rail tracks supported on columns elevated approximately 30 to 35 feet above existing grade. Vertical Modified At-Grade Alignment: refers to the high-speed rail tracks on an earthen berm elevated approximately 20 feet above the existing grade. The existing Union Pacific rail tracks would similarly be elevated and realigned in some areas parallel to the high-speed rail tracks.

Alternative Land Use and Circulation Plans Overview Transit Focus Downtown Focus Employment Focus

Land Use Comparison Transit Focus Downtown Focus Employment Focus

Transportation Comparison Transit Focus Downtown Focus Employment Focus

2005 DTSP Buildout Projection DISTRICT COMMERCIAL BUILDOUT (S.F.) RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS Historic 72,739 115 Expansion 281,494 448 Cannery 180,909 554 Cannery Project 45,000 206 Transitional 141,266 79 Civic/residential only 7,322 14 Gateway 265,765 159 TOTAL 994,495 1,576 BAE Buildout Projection Phase I (2025) Phase II (2040) Housing (du) 86-779 Commercial (bldg. s.f.) 102,000 117,000 Office (bldg. s.f.) 82,000 167,000 Hotel (rooms) 95-158 Industrial (bldg. s.f.) N/A Housing (du) 235-1,763 Commercial (bldg. s.f.) 383,000 531,000 Office (bldg. s.f.) 186,000 645,000 Hotel (rooms) 290 1,400 Industrial (bldg. s.f.) N/A