Residential Development

Similar documents
continues in the watershed, additional flood control and water quality / natural system improvements may be required in the future.

Lakefront Revegetation

Low Impact Development in the Transportation Environment: Lessons Learned in North Carolina

PLANTS FOR LAKEFRONT REVEGETATION

APPENDIX E AQUATIC WEED CONTROL. Revision 5

WQ-03 STORMWATER WETLAND

Three Rivers Park District Administration Center Rain Garden

2015 Aquatic Plant Surveys

Evaluating Urban Stormwater Retrofits in the SE US Coastal Plain

WELCOME. Scott Provost Water Resources Specialist - WDNR Wisconsin Rapids, WI

4.6. Low Impact and Retentive Grading

Designation of Critical Habitat Areas Bear Lake, Portage County. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Eau Claire, WI

Lake Mansfield 2012 Aquatic Vegetation Survey

Stormwater Systems in Your Neighborhood

Plants for Rain Gardens and Pond Edges

Figure 1. Bioswale along roadside. Photo courtesy of CalTrans. Figure 2. Diagram of typical bioswale (adapted from UDFCD 1999)

HOW ONE SMALL COMMUNITY SAVED BIG BUCKS ON ITS CSO LONG-TERM CONTROL PLAN

Storm Water Quality and Shoreline Restoration Improvements - Grant Funding Request City of Mound Carlson Park Bolton & Menk Project No.

Low Impact Development and Bioretention: Lessons Learned in North Carolina

PRE-DESIGN CONCEPT REPORT GRAND CANAL RESTORATION

Lake Nokomis Shoreline Enhancement Project

Use of Best Management Practices

Severn River Sub-Watershed: BMP 09-Retrofit

memo Project Name Little Lake Point Intercept Survey 2017 Date 9/5/17 To / Contact info Jerry Spetzman Cc / Contact info Greg Graske, PE

Hunts Point Landing, Bronx, New York

Sustainable Drainage Applied Research Group, Coventry University Priory Street, Coventry, CV1 5FB, United Kingdom 3

North Branch of Cypress Creek Ecological Restoration: A Comprehensive Approach to Stream Restoration

RainScaping. Sustainable Landscape Solutions for Stormwater Management

Rainfall, Streamflow, and Water-Quality Data During Stormwater Monitoring, Halawa Stream Drainage Basin, Oahu, Hawaii, July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2001

memo Project Name Spider Lake Point Intercept Survey 2017 Date 9/5/17 To / Contact info Jerry Spetzman Cc / Contact info Greg Graske, PE

Green Roof Benefits. Green Roof Media Selection for the Minimization of Pollutant Loadings in Roof Runoff

Lesson 2: Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs)

STAFFORD TRACT NORTH OF US90A 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 OBJECTIVE

To whom it may concern:

Brian Friedlich, PE. Jeremiah Bergstrom, LLA

1/21/2014. Definitions vary widely Legal vs. functional Not always obvious. Wetlands are legally protected by Clean Water Act (1972)

RECONNECTING A COMMUNITY TO THE CREEK

Low Impact Development Calculations using the Source Loading and Management Model (WinSLAMM)

2001 Southeastern Pennsylvania Stormwater Management Symposium Villanova University. Jean K. Akers

Subject: Sea Level Rise Constraints and Opportunities for India Basin

Native Plants. Vegetated Retaining Walls from Agrecol

Raingardens. Conserving and Protecting Water L

I-494 Rehabilitation Project SP (I-394 to Fish Lake Interchange) June 2014 Section 4(f) De Minimis Determination

5. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS

The Napa River Flood Protection Project

Post Construction BMPs

23.0 Green Roof STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUITABILITY KEY CONSIDERATIONS

A TWENTY YEAR PLAN TO RESTORE NAPLES BAY. Natural Resources Manager

PLANT LIST FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT

October 7, City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303) RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report

COMPENSATORY WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN NASH FM 529, LLC.

Rain Gardens: Are They the Answer? Holmdel Homeowner Education Program. Holmdel, NJ October 9, 2010

Multiple-event study of bioretention for treatment of urban storm water runoff

Case Study: Dallas Green Infrastructure for Stormwater

Key elements : Filter Strips must be designed within parameters required by the Fort Wayne s Development Standards/Criteria Manual.

Water Conservation Technologies, Larc 380 Semester Assignment

Lincoln 270. City of Lincoln. Stormwater Management Plan. April 2, 2013

Ponds of. Ballantrae

Tong Yu,* Xiangfei Li,** Miao Yu,* Yunxiu Liu,* Yan Zhang* * Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta ** Drainage

Habitat Improvements to the Motor Island Shoreline in the Upper Niagara River, NY: A Collaborative Approach

Chapter 4 - Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans

Use of colonizing species of submersed aquatic vegetation as nurse crops in restoration projects

Old Mill Community Association Bioretention Facility

PLANTING OF LARGE SCALE MARSH PROJECTS. Eddie Seidensticker, biologist, Natural Resources Conservation Service

John F. Kennedy STEM High School Green Infrastructure Information Sheet

Huntington Stormwater Utility

Map Reading 201: Where Does the Water Go?? Map Reading Map Reading 201. Interconnected Systems

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C.

319 Grant: Baker Creek & Centenary Creek Restoration Initiative

R1a: REINFORCED TURF TO REPLACE GRAVEL /GRASS PARKING ADJACENT TO SOUTH PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE.

Roof Runoff Harvesting Benefits for Regional Conditions in Low Density and Medium Density Residential Areas. Leila Talebi 1 and Robert Pitt 2

North Carolina Coastal Federation

Common Name: KRAL S WATER-PLANTAIN. Scientific Name: Sagittaria secundifolia Kral. Other Commonly Used Names: Little River water-plantain

Alternative Stormwater Management Practice RAIN GARDENS

green streets San Antonio, Texas February 17-18, 2009 Chris Kloss

West Little Pimmit Storm Sewer & John Marshall Green Street Projects. July 7, 2015 Nottingham Elementary School

DEALING WITH STORM WATER MANAGEMENT

Constructed Stormwater Wetlands

Maintaining Your Sparkle. Maintenance Issues. by Kathy Danforth

Bioswales: A Guide to Low-Impact Development Design and Maintenance. Introduction and Compilation by: Leslie D. Bartsch And Jennifer S.

Draft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

Introduction to Low Impact Development. Fred Milch. East Central Florida Regional Planning Council

STORMWATER REPORT FOR WALMART SUPERCENTER STORE # SIOUX FALLS, LINCOLN COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA BFA PROJECT NO

2017 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam

Pontchartrain Coastal Lines of Defense Program Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 1

4. CONCEPT PLAN DEVELOPMENT

Portland and Progressive Stormwater Design

Chi-hsu Hsieh*, and Allen P. Davis**,

Tentatively Selected Plan within Harlem River, East River and Western Long Island Sound Planning Region. First Level Costs. Federal Non-Federal Total

Best Management Practices

Quantitative Plant Surveys: Arcadia and Metacomet Lakes

Rain Garden Site Selection and Installation

Section 3 Non-Structural BMPs

ME DOT Route 3. File No.: City and State: Bar Harbor, ME

Environmental Laboratory. Propagation and Establishment of Native Plants for Vegetative Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems ERDC/EL TR-13-9

Asparagus Response to Water and Nitrogen

understanding Bioretention Areas Fact Sheet green infastructure WHAT IT IS

Urban Conservation Practice Physical Effects ESTABLISHMENT, GROWTH, AND HARVEST NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

Chapter 1 Introduction

Urban Rain Gardens: Capturing our local water. Martha Berthelsen The Watershed Project

Transcription:

20 MASON PARK 6.0 14.0 A 10 Emergency -2.0 Overflow (5.0') wet pond 4.5 maintenance access road inlet culvert (invert 4.51') level spreader (4.5') w/ orifice (3.5') Estimated Area (ac) wet pond = 0.55 shallow marsh = 1.41 tidal marsh = 1.20 Residential Development 10 Pedestrian Bridge (14') observation deck 14.0 18.5 8.0 3.0 2.0 Tree 20 Island Shallow Marsh 24.5 path 10.0 15.1 4.0 3.0-1.0 22.8 deep zone 2.0 6.0 agridrain water control structure (adjustable 2-4') kiosk amphitheater 14.0 1.08 20-3.0 0.8-1.7 20.3 Island 10.0 21.5 19.7 MASON PARK 1 7.0 1.7-2.4 Tidal Deep Marsh 3.0 2.4-3.1 B' deep zone 20 17.7 18.7 N 1.08 (est MTL) 6.0 18.7-3.0 Legend surface water elevation ground elevation approx. scale (ft) 0 200 2 foot contours (ft NAVD) B 20.7 7.0 14.0 overlook 14.9 11.3 14.0 A' Pedestrian Bridge (14') to tie into EXHIBIT 13 Conceptual Plan for the Brays Bayou Multi-Purpose Wetland Project BraysBayou_Exhibits_Final_rev.xls / Ex13 2/7/2002

Elevation (ft) 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0-2 -4 wet pond level spreader deep zone shallow marsh deep zone 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 A Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) Elevation (ft) 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0-2 -4 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0-2 -4 deep zones w/ island shallow marsh deep zone 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 island Distance (ft) tidal deep marsh berm w/ Agridrain deep zone marsh tidal deep marsh marsh 800 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 island Brays Bayou Distance (ft) A' Existing Ground Surface Wetland Profile MHHW MTL MSL MLLW EXHIBIT 14 Profile (A - A') of Brays Bayou Multi-Purpose Wetland Project BraysBayou_Exhibits_Final_rev.xls / Ex14 2/7/2002

20 18 16 railroad 14 walkway 12 Elevation (ft) 10 8 6 deep zone island deep zone 4 2 0-2 -4 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 B Distance (ft) Existing Ground Surface Wetland Profile MHHW MTL MSL MLLW B' EXHIBIT 15 Profile (B - B') of Brays Bayou Multi-Purpose Wetland Project BraysBayou_Exhibits_Final_rev.xls / Ex15 2/7/2002

. Wet Pond The first compartment in the treatment train is the wet pond or foreba y. This is a deep pond or cell that serves as a location for stormwater runoff storage and removes coarse suspended solids prior to entering the shallow wetland cells. The conceptual plan identifies a wet pond area of approximately 0.6 acres. The pond is planned to be approximately 6.5 feet deep with slopes ranging from 10:1 to 3:1 (H:V). Gradual side slopes will allow a steady incline on which vegetation can establish and also insure that water levels are not too deep in the event that a park visitor accidentally falls in. Exhibit 16 illustrates the wet pond ground slope detail. The slope will be 4:1 to the water surface, 10:1 to a water depth of 1.5 feet, 5:1 from a water depth of 1.5 to 2.5 feet, and 3:1 for depths greater than 2.5 feet. An additional survey of the project site was conducted in December 2001 and determined that the invert of the stormwater culvert under the railroad is 4.51 ft NAVD. This elevation was used to limit the wet pond normal high water levels to 4.5 ft NAVD and maximum (worst case) levels to 5.0 ft NAVD. An emergency overflow (fixed at 5 ft NAVD) will be located along the west berm of the wet pond to convey excessive runoff to Brays Bayou, and a 20-foot wide level spreader (fixed at 4.5 ft NAVD) will serve as the inflow structure to the shallow treatment marsh. The wet pond will provide storage for runoff from the first inch of rainfall and have a bleed down time of about 4 days for this volume. Estimated runoff is 2,313 m 3 based on a 1 inch rainfall to a 30 acre contributing watershed using a runoff coefficient of 75%. Draw down for the 1-inch rainfall volume can be accomplished using a bleed down orifice below the level spreader (orifice invert at 3.5 ft NAVD). The orifice will be sized to draw down the storm volume in approximately 4 days. Shallow Treatment Marsh The function of the treatment marsh will be to remove a portion of the remaining suspended solids, dissolved organics, nutrients, metals, and trace organics from the stormwater. The shallow treatment marsh is planned to be approximately 1.4 acres and water levels operated at 1 foot. The treatment marsh will include 4 deep zones; an inlet deep zone, 2 internal deep zones with habitat islands, and 1 outlet deep zone. The treatment marsh will have 3:1 slopes along the berms and within the deep zones. The role of the deep zones is to reduce short-circuiting through the wetland by promoting lateral distribution of flows, and for water storage during non-rainfall events. The deep zones will support fish and other aquatic wildlife during times of drought. An outflow water level control structure will be placed within the south berm to control discharge into the tidal marsh. Exhibit 17 illustrates a schematic of an inline Agridrain control structure. Stoplogs can be added or removed to the Agridrain to control the operational water depth within the treatment marsh. BRAYSBAYOU_CONCEPTPLAN_FINAL_REV.DOC 24

7 6 5 4:1 Water Surface 4 10:1 Elevation (ft) 3 2 1 5:1 3:1 Water Depth = 1.5 feet Water Depth = 2.5 feet 0-1 -2 Wet Pond Profile -3 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Distance (ft) EXHIBIT 16 Wet Pond Ground Slope Detail from the Brays Bayou Multi-Purpose Wetland Project BraysBayou_Exhibits_Final_rev.xls / Ex16 2/7/2002

Inline Control Structure 15 feet stoplogs 3:1 (H:V) BERM Deep Zone Water Flow Deep Zone Outlet 'T' EXHIBIT 17 Schematic of Inline Agridrain Outlet Water Level Control Structure BraysBayou_Exhibits_Final_rev.xls / Ex17 2/7/2002

. Tidal Marsh The tidal marsh component of the treatment train will consist of a tidally influenced wetland plant community created adjacent to Brays Bayou. The functions of this tidal marsh will be to provide a combination of wildlife habitat, aesthetics (public use), and final polishing of stormwater. The tidal marsh is planned to encompass an area of approximately 1.2 acres with 3:1 slopes within the deep zones. Side slopes from the deep zone to the pedestrian walkway and railroad right-of-way will range from 9:1 to 14:1. This will allow a gradual incline on which different plant zones can establish. The tidal marsh will consist of an inlet deep zone and two habitat islands surrounded by an open water area. Water levels in the marsh will be controlled by normal tidal changes in Brays Bayou. The deep zones are expected to be approximately 4 feet below the MTL. Review of historic water levels (Exhibit 7) from the Manchester gauge indicates that water levels should remain at about 2 feet in the deep zones during extreme low tide events. Public Use The tidal and treatment marshes will be the main public-use focal points at the project site. The Brays Bayou MPWP is located adjacent to Mason Park. To encourage public use, pedestrian bridges (Exhibit 18) and paths have been added to the project site. An example of the construction detail for a crushed rock pedestrian path is illustrated in Exhibit 19. Public-use features such as a tidal marsh overlook and observation decks within the treatment and tidal marsh have also been added to promote public use. Islands within the deep zones have been added to provide habitat and refuge for birds and to encourage public study. Other features such as a kiosk and amphitheater will also be used to display project information and interpretive signs of plants and wildlife observed onsite. Exhibit 20 illustrates some interpretive sign examples from wetland systems in Florida (Loxahatchee and Wakodahatchee), Texas (DuPont), and Arizona (Sweetwater). Planting Plan The majority of the Brays Bayou constructed wetland project will be altered from its current condition and will be re-contoured and planted with wetland and aquatic plant species. A planting plan for the Brays Bayou constructed wetland project is presented in Exhibit 21. This planting plan describes each of the plant communities that will be included on the site with the elevation ranges presented in Exhibit 22. A table summarizing each of the plant species being introduced, planting propagule type, approximate number of plant propagules, and areas are presented in Exhibit 23. All cleared and graded upland areas will be planted with a mixture of upland grass species to provide wildlife cover and erosion control. These areas include all embankments and areas cleared or altered as a result of site construction. Planting of robust-growing plant species will be minimized along the western side of vegetation zones to reduce visual obstruction of the wetland areas to park visitors. BRAYSBAYOU_CONCEPTPLAN_FINAL_REV.DOC 27

EXHIBIT 18 Brays Bayou Multi-Purpose Wetland Project - Pedestrian Bridge Example (Greenwood Urban Park, Orlando, FL) BraysBayou_Exhibits_Final_rev.xls / Ex18 2/7/2002

15' Top of Berm Width 6" MIN 3/4"-0 Crushed Rock 2 % 3 1 1 3 Earth Fill EXHIBIT 19 Brays Bayou Multi-Purpose Wetland Project Pedestrian Path Detail BraysBayou_Exhibits_Final_rev.xls / Ex19 2/7/2002

EXHIBIT 20 Interpretive Sign Examples in Wetland Systems Example_Signs.xls 2/7/2002

EXHIBIT 22 Elevation Range for Hydrological Zones at the Brays Bayou MPWP Ground Elevation (ft NAVD) Normal Water Location / Zone Lower Upper Level (ft NAVD) WET POND Littoral Zone 3.90 5.80 4.50 Deep Water Zone -2.00 3.90 TREATMENT MARSH Upland Boundary 4.00 > 4.00 3.00 Shallow Marsh Zone 2.00 4.00 Deep Water Zone -1.00 2.00 TIDAL MARSH Upland Boundary 3.06 > 3.06 1.08 High Marsh/Upland Transition 2.43 3.06 High Marsh 1.67 2.43 Low Marsh 0.83 1.67 Deep Water Zone -3.00 0.83 BraysBayou_Exhibits_Final_rev.xls / Ex22 2/7/2002

EXHIBIT 23 Brays Bayou Multi-Purpose Wetland Project Planting Plan Detail LEGEND WET POND LOCATION / ZONE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME PROPAGULE TYPE NOTES APPROX. AREA PLANTED (ac) APPROX. NO. PLANT PROPAGULES Littoral Zone a Zizaniopsis milacea giant cutgrass seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.03 150 clumps Scirpus spp. bulrush (California/American) seedling/plug direct transplant/propagate in pots 0.02 50 sprigs/50 clumps Panicum hemitomon maidencane seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.01 50 pots Sagittaria graminea grassy arrowhead seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.01 50 clumps Bacopa monnieri water hyssop seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.005 50 pots Ludwigia peploides floating seedbox seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.005 10 pots 0.08 410 Deep Water Zone Ceratophyllum demersum coontail plant fragments-one gal disperse plant fragments 0.23 5 gallon bucket Potamogeton spp. pondweed plant fragments-one gal disperse plant fragments 0.23 5 gallon bucket 0.46 10 TREATMENT MARSH Upland Boundary a Taxodium distichum bald cypress tree over 3 ft obtain from nursery 0.035 15 trees Ulmus crassifolia cedar elm tree over 3 ft obtain from nursery 0.035 15 trees 0.07 30 Shallow Marsh Zone a Scirpus spp. bulrush seedling/plug direct transplant/propagate in pots 0.14 350 sprigs/350 clumps Zizaniopsis milacea giant cutgrass seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.1 500 clumps Sagittaria graminea grassy arrowhead seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.21 1,000 clumps Panicum hemitomon maidencane seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.005 35 pots Eleocharis quadrangulata square-stemmed spikerush seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.31 1,500 clumps Panicum virgatum switch grass seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.01 50 pots Ponterderia cordata pickerel weed seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.07 350 pots Thalia dealbata powdery thalia seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.01 50 pots Canna spp. canna seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.01 25 pots Iris virginica southern blue iris seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.02 100 pots Scirpus validus softstem bulrush seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.005 35 pots Spartina patens marsh hay cordgrass seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.1 500 pots 0.99 4,845 Deep Water Zone Ceratophyllum demersum coontail plant fragments-one gal disperse plant fragments 0.07 5 gallon bucket Potamogeton spp. pondweed plant fragments-one gal disperse plant fragments 0.07 5 gallon bucket Najas guadalupensis southern naiad plant fragments-one gal mid-late summer fragments 0.07 5 gallon bucket Nymphaea odorata water lily seedling/rhizome direct transplant rhizomes 0.07 100 clumps Heteranthera dubia water stargrass seedling/rhizome propagate in pots / island edges 0.01 10 pots Bacopa monnieri water hyssop seedling/rhizome propagate in pots / island edges 0.06 100 pots 0.35 225 BraysBayou_Exhibits_Final_rev.xls / Ex23 2/7/2002

EXHIBIT 23 Brays Bayou Multi-Purpose Wetland Project Planting Plan Detail LEGEND TIDAL MARSH LOCATION / ZONE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME PROPAGULE TYPE NOTES APPROX. AREA PLANTED (ac) APPROX. NO. PLANT PROPAGULES Upland Boundary a Taxodium distichum bald cypress tree over 3 ft obtain from nursery 0.04 17 trees Ulmus crassifolia cedar elm tree over 3 ft obtain from nursery 0.02 8 trees Schizachyrum scoparium little bluestem seedling/plug obtain from Greens Mit Bank 0.02 100 pots 0.08 25 trees / 100 pots High Marsh/ Tripsacum dactyloides gama grass seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.07 33 pots Upland Transition a Panicum virgatum switch grass seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.07 33 pots Spartina patens marsh hay cordgrass seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.08 33 pots 0.22 99 High Marsh a Scirpus robustus saltmarsh bulrush seedling/plug direct transplant root masses 0.02 100 root masses Spartina patens marsh hay cordgrass seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.06 300 pots Carex hyalinolepis thin-scale sedge seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.06 300 clumps Juncus roemerianus black needlerush seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.06 300 pots Hymenocallis liriosme spider lily seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.01 50 pots Spartina cynosuroides giant cordgrass seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.01 50 sprigs Scirpus californicus california bulrush seedling/plug direct transplant sprigs 0.03 100 sprigs Sagittaria lancifolia bulltongue seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.07 350 pots Cladium jamaicense jamaica sawgrass seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.01 50 pots Eleocharis spp. spikerush seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.01 20 pots Zizaniopsis milliacea giant cutgrass seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.04 150 clumps 0.38 1,770 Low Marsh Crinum americanum swamp lily seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.04 200 pots Scirpus robustus saltmarsh bulrush seedling/plug direct transplant root masses 0.06 300 root masses Scirpus californicus california bulrush seedling/plug direct transplant root masses 0.11 500 sprigs Spartina cynosuroides giant cordgrass seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.01 50 sprigs Zizaniopsis milliacea giant cutgrass seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.04 150 clumps Carex hyalinolepis thin-scale sedge seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.04 200 clumps Cladium jamaicense jamaica sawgrass seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.01 50 pots Eleocharis spp. spikerush seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.01 20 pots Sagittaria lancifolia bulltongue seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.05 250 pots Hymenocallis liriosme spider lily seedling/plug propagate in pots 0.01 50 pots 0.38 1,770 Deep Water Zone Heteranthera dubia water stargrass seedling/plug propagate in pots / island edges 0.08 10 pots Bacopa monnieri water hyssop seedling/plug propagate in pots / island edges 0.12 90 pots Nymphaea mexicana yellow waterlily seedling/plug propagate in pots / island edges 0.08 10 pots Ruppia martima widgeongrass plant fragments-one gal propagate in pots 0.08 5 gallon bucket 0.36 1 gal / 110 pots a short-statured plants to be used along one-third of zone facing Bayou to allow unobstructed view of ponded areas BraysBayou_Exhibits_Final_rev.xls / Ex23 2/7/2002

. Wet Pond The wet pond includes two wetland vegetation zones, a littoral edge and deep-water zone. The littoral edge consists of six emergent herbaceous species, including giant cutgrass (Zizaniopsis milacea), bulrush (Scirpus spp.), maidencane (Panicum hemitomon), grassy arrowhead (Sagittaria graminea), water hyssop (Bacopa monnieri), and floating seedbox (Ludwigia peploides). This zone encompasses the entire edge of the wet pond for a total area of about 0.1 acres. Approximately 0.5 acres of deep-water zones will be constructed within the wet pond. This zone will consist of two submerged aquatic plants, coontail (Ceratophyllum demersum) and pondweed (Potamogeton spp.). Shallow Treatment Marsh The shallow treatment marsh will consist of three wetland vegetation zones: upland boundary, shallow marsh, and deep-water zones. The upland boundary will consist of two wildlife habitat islands located within each of the internal deep zones. These islands will be approximately 0.1 acres and planted with two-tree species, bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) and cedar elm (Ulmus crassifolia). Approximately 1 acre of the shallow treatment marsh will consist of shallow marsh zones. This zone includes twelve emergent herbaceous species, bulrush, giant cutgrass, grassy arrowhead, maidencane, square-stemmed spikerush (Eleocharis quadrangulata), switch grass (Panicum virgatum), pickerel weed (Ponterderia cordata), powdery thalia (Thalia dealbata), canna (Canna spp.), southern blue iris (Iris virginica), softstem bulrush (Scirpus validus), and marsh hay cordgrass (Spartina patens). The shallow marsh zones are located between each of the deep-water zones. The treatment marsh will include 4 deep zones, an inlet deep zone, 2 internal deep zones with habitat islands, and 1 outlet deep zone. The deep-water zone consists of the same aquatic species found in the wet pond deep zone with the addition of southern naiad (Nijas guadalupensis), water lily (Nymphea odorata), water stargrass (Heteranthera dubia), and water hyssop (Bacopa monnieri). Water stargrass and water hyssop will be planted along the island edges. Tidal Marsh The tidal marsh will include 5 vegetation planting zones including upland boundary, high marsh/upland transition, high marsh, low marsh, and deep water zones. The habitat islands located within the internal deep zone will be planted with 2 upland boundary tree species including bald cypress and cedar elm for an area about 0.1 acres. These trees will be planted along areas in the upper fringe of the high marsh/upland transition zones. Little bluestem (Schizachyrum scoparium), a prairie grass, will also be included in the upland boundary zone. BRAYSBAYOU_CONCEPTPLAN_FINAL_REV.DOC 35

. The high marsh/upland transition zone consists of approximately 0.2 acres of the tidal marsh area. This zone includes 3 plant species including gama grass (Tripsacum dactyloides), switch grass, marsh hay cordgrass. These plants will be planted in areas with elevations approximately 2.4 to 3.1 ft NAVD (1.4 to 2.0 feet relative to the MTL). Approximately 0.4 acres of the tidal marsh area will consist of the high marsh planting zone. This zone includes eleven wetland plant species including saltmarsh bulrush (Scirpus robustus), marsh hay cordgrass, thin-scale sedge (Carex hyalinolepis), black needlerush (Juncus roemerianus), spider lily (Hymenocallis liriosme), giant cordgrass (Spartina cynosuroides), California bulrush (Scirpus californicus), bulltongue (Sagittaria lancifolia), Jamaica sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense), spikerush (Eleocharis spp.), and giant cutgrass. These plants will be planted in areas with elevations approximately 1.7 to 2.4 ft NAVD (0.6 to 1.4 feet relative to the MTL). The low marsh zone will include ten wetland plant species including swamp lily (Crinum americanum), saltmarsh bulrush, California bulrush, giant cordgrass, giant cutgrass, thin-scale sedge, Jamaica sawgrass, spikerush, bulltongue, and spider lily for a total area of approximately 0.4 acres. These plants will be planted in areas with elevations approximately 0.8 to 1.7 ft NAVD ( 0.3 to 0.6 feet relative to the MTL). The deep-water zones will include an inlet deep zone and a deep zone surrounding the 2 habitat islands for a total area of approximately 0.4 acres. The deep zones will include 4 wetland species including water stargrass, water hyssop, yellow waterlily (Nymphaea mexicana) and widgeongrass (Ruppia martima). Water stargrass, water hyssop, and yellow waterlily will be planted along the island edges. Runoff Quality One of the goals of the Brays Bayou Wetland project is improvement of stormwater quality being discharged into Brays Bayou. The chemical composition of stormwater runoff is highly variable, both between sites, and at a given location over time. One method to estimate runoff quality is to utilize empirical results from similar watersheds. Driscoll et al (1990) provide tables of typical runoff quality for highway stormwater in Texas urban settings. For this analysis estimated event mean concentrations in urban stormwater runoff for the Brays Bayou project are assumed to be: TSS 150 mg/l, BOD5 60 mg/l, TN 6 mg/l, NH4-N 4 mg/l, TKN 6 mg/l, TP 1 mg/l, fecal coliforms 15,000 col/100 ml, cadmium 2 µg/l, lead 50 µg/l, and zinc 75 µg/l. Runoff from the 30-acre watershed was estimated for a 20-year period of record based on historic rainfall from 1970 to 1991. Long-term average flow from this watershed is estimated as 300 m 3 /d based on a 75% runoff and an average rainfall of 47.5 in/yr. Monthly maximum runoff is estimated as 1,257 m 3 /d based on a maximum monthly rainfall of 16.3 inches and 75% runoff. Runoff from this watershed was also calculated using a 25-year 24-hour storm event of 9.5 inches and 75% runoff, resulting in an estimated maximum design flow of 21,971 m 3 /d. BRAYSBAYOU_CONCEPTPLAN_FINAL_REV.DOC 36

. Expected Performance Exhibit 24 provides a summary of the expected annual average performance of the MPWP, assuming an effective area of 1.41 acres. This includes only the area for the shallow treatment marsh and therefore results in conservative annual removal efficiencies. Effluent concentrations were calculated using the k-c* model (Kadlec and Knight, 1996) resulting in the following estimated annual average wetland removal efficiencies: BOD5 74%, TSS 80%, TN 52%, NH4-N 62%, TKN 52%, TP 45%, fecal coliform 96%, cadmium 65%, lead 75%, and zinc 66%. For comparison, another method in determining the wetland size is to use a minimum surface area in relation to the contributing watershed. The wetland to watershed area ratio (WWAR) can be calculated from existing stormwater wetlands and compared to pollutant removal efficiencies (Kadlec and Knight, 1996). Strecker et al (1990) conducted a literature review of 13 natural and constructed stormwater wetlands reporting removal efficiencies and wetland to watershed area ratios for each system. The median WWAR for these stormwater systems was 3.6%, with ratios ranging from 0.4% to 13.0%. Median wetland removal efficiencies were as follows: TSS 80.5%, NH4-N 44.5%, TP 58.0%, lead 83.0%, and zinc 42.0%. The WWAR for the Brays Bayou constructed wetland treatment marsh is 4.7%. If a WWAR of 3.6% were applied to the Brays Bayou contributing drainage basin size (30 acres) this would result in a wetland area of 1.08 acres. The 1.2 acre tidal marsh is expected to provide additional water quality benefits. Tidal marsh areas have been found to be as effective as other wetlands for water quality enhancement (Mitsch and Gosselink 2000; Kadlec and Knight 1996). Concentrations of BOD5, TSS, nutrients, and trace metals in the bayou will be reduced by this tidal inundation. Treatment performance of this area is difficult to predict due to the highly dynamic nature of the tidal cycle. However, due to the relatively high ambient pollutant concentrations in Brays Bayou, mass removals may be high. Actual performance in the Brays Bayou MPWP will vary from estimates summarized in Exhibit 23. These estimates are based on the assumed event mean concentrations noted above for urban stormwater runoff, a 30-acre contributing watershed with 75% runoff, a wetland area of 1.41 acres (treatment marsh), and an annual average rainfall of 47.5 inches. Actual performance may be better or worse than these estimates and should be documented through a program of hydrologic and water quality monitoring. These measured performance rates can in turn be used for providing an additional quantitative basis for future stormwater wetland designs in the Houston area. BRAYSBAYOU_CONCEPTPLAN_FINAL_REV.DOC 37

EXHBIT 24 Estimated Annual Average Performance of Brays Bayou Multi-Purpose Wetland Project C* k 20 (m/yr) Flow (m 3 /d) 301 --- --- 301 --- BOD 5 (mg/l) 60 6.7 34 16 74 Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 150 29.1 100 30 80 Total Nitrogen (mg/l) 6 1.5 22 2.9 52 Ammonium Nitrogen (mg/l) 4 0.0 18 1.51 62 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (mg/l) 6 1.5 22 2.9 52 Total Phosphorus (mg/l) 1.0 0.02 12 0.5 45 Fecal Coliforms (col/100 ml) 15,000 300 75 599 96 Cadmium (µg/l) 2 0.20 25 0.7 65 Lead (µg/l) 50 5.0 35 12.3 75 Zinc (µg/l) 75 10.0 28 25.2 66 Design Temperature ( o C): 21 Long Term Annual Average Rainfall (in): 47.5 Wetland Area (ac): 1.41 Long Term Annual Average ET (in): 48.5 Hydraulic Loading Rate (cm/d): 5.3 Contributing Watershed Area (ac): 30 Runoff Coefficient (%): 75 Driscoll (1990) Parameter k-c* Model Parameters modified from Kadlec and Knight, 1996 or estimated based on best professional judgment Ce = C*+(C1-C*)exp(-kA/0.0365Q) Inflow Model Parameters Estimated Effluent Estimated Removal Eff % BraysBayou_Exhibits_Final_rev.xls / Ex24 2/7/2002

. Implementation Plan Implementation of the proposed Brays Bayou MPWP will include the following steps: Site-specific studies Preliminary design Final design and preparation of bid documents Construction Startup and operation Operational monitoring Site-specific studies need to be conducted to verify the following conditions prior to final design: Final surveying Geotechnical investigations to document near-surface soil conditions and presence/absence of unsuitable construction materials such as clay or rock Detailed mapping of the watershed area to identify the total basin area, the proportion of impervious area in the basin, and to better characterize land use conditions that might affect water quality entering the proposed Brays Bayou MPWP Any studies required by local, state, or federal agencies related to protected species, cultural resources, etc. Preliminary design should be based on the best site-specific information available. Following review of the preliminary design, the final design and bid documents should be prepared for review. An operation and maintenance (O&M) manual should be prepared as part of this design process. All necessary permits (including a Section 404 permit under the federal Clean Water Act) should be acquired during this design process and prior to construction. Project startup and operation will be based on the final O&M plan. Monitoring goals and objectives should be included in the O&M plan. BRAYSBAYOU_CONCEPTPLAN_FINAL_REV.DOC 39

. References Driscoll, E.D. 1990. Pollutant Loadings and Impacts from Highway Stormwater Runoff. Volume 1: Design Procedures. Publication FHWA-RD-88-006. FHWA, McLean, VA. Kadlec, R.H. and R.L. Knight 1996. Treatment Wetlands. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. 896 pp. Mitsch, W.J. and J.G. Gosselink. 2000. Wetlands. Third edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY. 920 pp. Sipocz, A. 2001. Brays Bayou Wetland Creation Project at Mason Park Reference Marsh Survey at Hunting Bayou and Federal Road. Survey Conducted July 21, 2001. Strecker, E.M., J.M. Kersnar, E.D. Driscoll, and R.R. Homer. 1992. The Use of Wetlands for Controlling Stormwater Pollution. Washington, DC: Terrene Institute. EPA/600. BRAYSBAYOU_CONCEPTPLAN_FINAL_REV.DOC 40

. APPENDIX A Surface Water Quality Timeseries Plots

8 7 11306 11307 6 Total Phosphorus (mg/l) 5 4 3 2 1 0 Sep-70 Jun-73 Mar-76 Dec-78 Sep-81 Jun-84 Feb-87 Nov-89 Aug-92 May-95 Feb-98 EXHIBIT A-1 Total Phosphorus Surface Water Concentrations from Stations in Brays Bayou BraysBayou_STORET_plots.xls / TP 1/22/2002

20 18 16 11288 11306 11307 Ammonia Nitrogen (mg/l) 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Sep-70 Jun-73 Mar-76 Dec-78 Sep-81 Jun-84 Feb-87 Nov-89 Aug-92 May-95 Feb-98 EXHIBIT A-2 Total Ammonia Nitrogen Surface Water Concentrations from Stations in Brays Bayou and Buffalo Bayou BraysBayou_STORET_plots.xls / NH4 1/22/2002

0.35 0.3 11306 11307 Unionized Ammonia (mg/l) 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 Sep-70 Jun-73 Mar-76 Dec-78 Sep-81 Jun-84 Feb-87 Nov-89 Aug-92 May-95 Feb-98 EXHIBIT A-3 Unionized Ammonia Surface Water Concentrations from Stations in Brays Bayou BraysBayou_STORET_plots.xls / NH3 1/22/2002

9 8 11306 11307 7 Nitrate Nitrogen (mg/l) 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Sep-70 Jun-73 Mar-76 Dec-78 Sep-81 Jun-84 Feb-87 Nov-89 Aug-92 May-95 Feb-98 EXHIBIT A-4 Nitrate Nitrogen Surface Water Concentrations from Stations in Brays Bayou BraysBayou_STORET_plots.xls / NO3 1/22/2002

4 3.5 11288 11307 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (mg/l) 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Sep-70 Jun-73 Mar-76 Dec-78 Sep-81 Jun-84 Feb-87 Nov-89 Aug-92 May-95 Feb-98 EXHIBIT A-5 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Surface Water Concentrations from Stations in Brays Bayou and Buffalo Bayou BraysBayou_STORET_plots.xls / TKN 1/22/2002

40 35 30 11307 BOD5 (mg/l) 25 20 15 10 5 0 Sep-70 Jun-73 Mar-76 Dec-78 Sep-81 Jun-84 Feb-87 Nov-89 Aug-92 May-95 Feb-98 EXHIBIT A-6 5-Day Biological Oxygen Demand Surface Water Concentrations from Stations in Brays Bayou BraysBayou_STORET_plots.xls / BOD5 1/22/2002

500 450 400 11288 11306 11307 Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Sep-70 Jun-73 Mar-76 Dec-78 Sep-81 Jun-84 Feb-87 Nov-89 Aug-92 May-95 Feb-98 EXHIBIT A-7 Total Suspended Solids Surface Water Concentrations from Stations in Brays Bayou and Buffalo Bayou BraysBayou_STORET_plots.xls / TSS 1/22/2002