Linnanmaa- Kaijonharju Mapbased

Similar documents
Emerson Park Master Plan Update. Public Meeting III August 27, 2014

Introduction. Community Outreach Approach. Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan. Online Questionnaire Summary of Feedback.

FACT SHEET: COMMUNITY INPUT S IMPACT ON THE DESIGN FOR THE OBAMA PRESIDENTIAL CENTER

Inner Courtyards as Public Open Spaces

a) Inventory of all existing privately-owned, state-owned, or local governmentowned recreational facilities and open spaces within the context area

Jacksons Hill Master Plan

Two Things... that you love about the City of North Vancouver

Proposed Reconstruction of Cleveland s Public Square

2013 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE

Good education Good living Green future

4 C OMMUNITY D ISTRICTS

Wentworth Point July Community Information Session Feedback Summary

Cambridge. West Cambridge site. What is a Shared Facilities Hub? Welcome

Don Mills Crossing Study and Celestica Lands Development Application Community Meeting, Open House, and Breakout Discussions

Public responses to the question what do you want Muscatine to be, 20 years from now? (Responses were categorized as follows)

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

Draft Masterplan Consultation Report Summer 2015 Spring (Updated following community review)

Pointe-Claire Community Destination

Create a connected ecological network. Connect districts with transit. Let the centre define the community

Neighborhood Districts

U Boulevard Area, 2018 Update. U Boulevard Area Update. Public Consultation Summary Report

Fountain Plaza Park Place-making Party in the Street Participant Comments

2. reimagine kings way undercroft as a community space

Project Output Indicators for Federal Gas Tax Investments

greenprint midtown SUSTAINABILITY ACTION PLAN 2012

Online Survey Results 1 Port Street East

Workshop 3. City of Burlington Waterfront Hotel Planning Study. September 14, The Planning Partnership

Full Name /title*. Address 1. Address 2 Post Code* *.. Phone* *Required fields for draw

JACKsON STREET PIER CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PACKAGE SEPTEMBER 21, 2017

THE NEIGHBORHOOD TODAY

RESEDA - WEST VAN NUYS COMMUNITY PLAN

Plenty Gorge Park Draft Master Plan Consultation Report. Draft Master Plan April 2018

VIRGINIA KEY CONSENSUS MASTER PLAN

West Eau Claire Park & Public Realm Plan. What We Heard Report. Prepared by: O2 Planning + Design Inc. (O2) Prepared for: The City of Calgary

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN

Gurnell Leisure Centre, Ealing Redevelopment proposals. Prepared for LB Ealing_December 2014

Moreno Valley College: Conceptual Master Planning - Site Analysis Lasselle Street, Moreno Valley, CA 92551

A 10-Year Strategic Plan for Recreation, Parks, Arenas and Culture City of Peterborough

Shared Principles and Emerging Plan Directions

Agincourt Mall Planning Framework Review Public Open House #2 Consultation Summary

MEETING MINUTES East Carolina University Comprehensive Master Plan Page 1 of 1

WHAT WE HEARD REPORT - Summary Bonnie Doon Mall Redevelopment Application (LDA )

Welcome to our exhibition

Courthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study. Courthouse Square Working Group #13 October 15, 2014

Sibbesborg: Competition for Sustainable Community Development

East Central Area Plan

04Design. Methodology. Future of Jacksons Hill Identifying Potential Uses Building Typology and Adaptability Community Engagement

The Chinese University of Hong Kong Campus Master Plan Stage 3 Stakeholders' Engagement Report

WHAT IS THE GRAVESEND HERITAGE QUARTER PROJECT?

Courthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study. Clarendon / Courthouse Civic Association October 21, 2014

SIBBESBORG COMPETITION

TSAWWASSEN TOWN CENTRE REDEVELOPMENT BLOCK A 004

C.T Univercity FINSQUARE

Green Line North Centre City Alignment

The Cambie Corridor 2015 Fall workshop series. What we heard WORKSHOP OUTLINE

CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH SE 1 ST STREET COMPLETE STREETS IMPROVEMENTS

Refocus Kodak: Themes and Ideas to Date As of May

Denton. A. Downtown Task Force

Boise State University October 8 - Workshop # 2. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Executive Committee Ayers Saint Gross

ZONING. 230 Attachment B

TOURS AND EXCURSIONS TOUR OPERATOR:

(SUB)URBAN LIVINGROOM!

Chapter 7 Route window W20 Dover Road and Leigh Road bridges. Transport for London

Guiding Principles for the SR 520 Replacement Project

Welcome! UBC Community Conversations. Proposed new community garden space in Chancellor Place and Wesbrook Place. Traffic flow on Iona Drive

The Recreational Heart of Cannington - MacLeod & Claire Hardy Parks

1 October Dear Citizens of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County,

A L F O N S O A R C H I T E C T S

Task Force on Kai Tak Harbourfront Development. Station Square at Kai Tak

West Campus Village Concept Review

SYRINGA VALLEY SPECIFIC PLAN NARRATIVE

Summary of key themes from ideas competition page 1 of 5. Summary of Key ThemeS: The ViaducTS

GENE FRIEND RECREATION CENTER Civic Design Review Concept Design DECEMBER14, 2015

As is referenced in the site analysis, the current site access is along Loggers Lane and on to Galbraith Avenue.

The subject site plan amendment proposes the following revisions to the approved site plan:

Date: Wednesday, July 26, :00 7:00 p.m. Wesbrook Community Centre, Room 201, 3335 Webber Lane

The Adeline Corridor Plan Area is located in South Berkeley (click) and is centered around the Ashby BART station. SLIDE 3: Workshop Photo

Overview and Update of the Rutgers-New Brunswick Physical Master Plan. January 2015

WELCOME. Welcome to this public exhibition about the future of the Aylesham Shopping Centre.

Welcome. Community Consultation Meeting November 28, Review and discuss the Bathurst Quay Neighbourhood Plan Framework

Oxford Brookes University Masterplan Headington Campus March 2007

East Area Plan. Steering Committee Meeting May 24, Art Gym Denver

EAST IRVINGTON / TOWN GREEN / GLENVILLE / WATCH HILL / WYLDWOOD / BENEDICT AVENUE MEETING March 11, 2008 Open Group Visioning

SOUTHWEST TRANSITWAY (STAGE 2) PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE

The proposals presented in September drew a large number of comments and feedback and have been grouped together as follows:

Welcome. Welcome to our first Open Day event

MARKET STREET PARK COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY. December 2018 MARKET STREET PARK COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY

STOCKHOLM ROYAL SEAPORT

Further input invited as Colchester Growth Strategy nears final phase

Statement of Community Involvement LAND OFF SOUTHDOWN ROAD HORNDEAN, HAMPSHIRE

The city is lacking large, special and distintinctive enough spaces for showing new forms of contemporary art.

Parker Pine Curve Master Plan January 28th, 2009, Public Workshop Comments

WELCOME. We are interested in your ideas and feedback, so please fill out one of our feedback forms.

WELCOME TO THE NEW WILTON PARK

Courthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study

PARDI MARKET PLAZA MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX C: PUBLIC INPUT SUMMARY

boyd park draft concept plan CITY ROAD BALSTON STREET KINGS WAY KAVANAGH STREET CITY OF MELBOURNE BOYD COMMUNITY HUB MULTIPURPOSE COURT NORTH LAWN

Sustainably Repositioning Greyfield Sites. Greyfield Sites Anywhere

[PLANNING RATIONALE] For Site Plan Control and Lifting of Holding Zone By-Law 101 Champagne Avenue. May 23, 2014

Transcription:

Linnanmaa- Kaijonharju Mapbased Survey Summary of the results 6.8.2018

Map-based survey To support the outline plan making process, residents, students, and other stakeholders were asked to voice their ideas and thoughts about the current state of the area and its future development possibilities. The survey was executed with the web-based map survey tool Harava and it was open 7.5.-27.5.2018. 584 responses were collected with the survey The survey collected 353 answers more than the survey made in December 2016. The respondents marked 3263 places on the survey maps

Survey outline 1. Background information on the respondents 2. The current state of Linnanmaa and Kaijonharju 3. Current routes and connections 4. Current parking arrangements 5. Linnanmaa and Kaijonharju in the future 6. Parking arrangements in the future 7. Free feedback

Prosenttia vastaajista Percent of the respondents 1. Background information on the respondents 35% 30% 25% 20% 65 % of the respondents were under 40 years old 54 % of the respondents were men, 45 % women ja 1 % others The family type of the respondents: a family with children, 36 % an one person household, 31 % a couple, 29 % 50 % of the respondents were employed and 31 % were students 15% 10% 5% 0% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70- The age of the respondent (answers = 571) 10% 0% Main occupation

2. The current state of the area The respondents were asked to mark places that they find pleasant or functional and unpleasant or non-functional in their current state. After marking a place it was possible for the respondent to give additional information about the marking. 865 pleasant or functional places were marked on the map. The markings were concentrated in the botanical garden area. 698 unpleasant or non-functional places were marked on the maps. The markings were concentrated in the Kaijonharju center area. Pleasant or functional places 1. Pleasant or cozy building, street or square 2. Pleasant or cozy park or shore 3. A functional place 4. An especially fine place, a true pearl 5. Other pleasant place Unpleasant or non-functional places 6. An unpleasant place 7. A building or square that feels unsafe 8. A place which feels unsafe due to traffic 9. A non-functional place 10. Other unpleasant place

The current state of the area: pleasant places (1/4) The southwest shore of Kuivasjärvi lake Kaijonlahti park and the bridge to Kylmäniemi The places marked as pleasant included: The botanical gardens A beautiful place in every season, A gorgeous park and recreation ground, Unique The southwest shore of the lake Kuivasjärvi Magnificent view, Beautiful nature close to home, a pleasant path in the forest, peacefulness, naturalness Kaijonlahti park and the bridge to Kylmäniemi A beautiful lake view, a small, beautiful park that has, in addition to a play area, space for picnics and outdoor games, a small effort and this place will become a true pearl The botanical gardens

The current state of the area: pleasant places (2/4) The University building The inside world of the university is beautiful in its own harsh way, The university is a pleasant place to study and spend time, Most of the inner courtyards are nice The forest and lawn northwest of the university A comfortable lawn for playing and spending one s time a chance to study outside, kyykkä stadion The ball square and the spruce lane The most pleasant outdoor space of the university, Invites to spend one s time, The legendary ball square. A landmark which is also used to guide quests to the campus St. Luke s Chapel Architectonically beautiful Forest and lawn The University The ball square and the spruce lane St. Luke s Chapel

The current state of the area: pleasant places (3/4) Prisma Many functions and services, A good and well assorted store Syynimaa park a peaceful park surrounded by forests, A good combination of natural and managed areas, a pleasant small forest with paths The wooden Linnanmaa Wood houses, rich in atmosphere, a cozy atmosphere, beautiful area, the streets have a nice scale Linnanmaa sports hall and forest A tidy place with many functions, a nice hall that can be accessed easily New residential buildings Prisma Syynimaa park Linnanmaa sports hall Forest The wooden Linnanmaa

The current state of the area: pleasant places (4/4) Kaijonharju center Good services, Health center, library and stores close to one another, A functional and cozy library, A youth center, where it is nice to spend one s time Pyykösjärvi lakeshore Beautiful lake view, shore park and a nice place for outdoor recreation Kaijonharju center Pyykösjärvi shore In addition to these places, park-like passages such as the birch lane on Yliopistonkatu and natural forests in various parts of the area were marked as pleasant places.

The current state of the area: unpleasant places Kaijonharju center was generally experienced as an unpleasant place The mall is shabby and outdated as a whole Untidy area, lots of trash A large parking area, generally undefined and backyard-like Kaijonharju center is somehow gloomy and unpractical, both by foot/bike and with a car

The current state of the area: unpleasant places On other areas, the markings concerned especially Large parking areas, located among others on the western side of the University and at Prisma The courtyard areas of the university are mainly bleak parking places, of which there is also often a shortage. Could casual outdoor hang-out places be created with the help of a parking facility? The state and exterior of buildings The unorganizedness of the surroundings

The current state of the area: places which feel unsafe Markings concerning buildings or squares that feel unsafe were focused in the Kaijonharju center area The reasons behind most of the markings were connected to the users of the area The markings also concerned the uncleanliness of the area

The current state of the area: places which feel unsafe due to traffic Based on the responses, the reasons behind the feeling of unsafety are among others: The high traffic and driving speeds especially on Kaitoväylä road High driving speeds: both cars and bikes Non-functional places where cars, pedestrians and bikes cross, among others: Ritaharjuntien crossing Yliopistokatu at YTHS The bus stops of the sports hall and the university The crossing at Prisma

3. Routes and connections The respondents were asked to mark routes that they find functional or nonfunctional. After they had marked the route on the map, they were asked the following questions: With which means of transport is this route functional or non-functional? For which purpose do you use this route? Why is this route is functional or non-functional? In addition to the current routes, the respondents were asked to mark places where new routes are needed. After marking the route, the respondents were asked about the means of transport for which the route is needed. Routes and connections 11. A functional route 12. A non-functional route 22. A place where a new route is needed The respondents gave a total of 404 markings concerning routes and connections.

Walking routes A pleasant route for recreation A direct route from Kaijonharju to the university Unofficial path, not maintained Extension of the recreational route Dangerous crossings, unclear routes Fast, smooth and cozy route in the forest A smooth route to the city center

Biking routes A pleasant route for recreation A direct route from Kaijonharju to the university Extension of the recreational route Separating walking and biking, space for the bus stops Bad visibility Dangerous crossings, unclear and complicated routes Fast, smooth and cozy route in the forest A smooth route to the city center

Car routes Crossing causes traffic jams, bad visibility Crossing with traffic jams Hard to access from the northern and western side Crossing with traffic jams Jammed in the rush hour, bus stops on the lanes, a shortcut for the pedestrians

Public transport routes

4. Current parking arrangements The respondents were asked to mark places with too many, enough or too few places for parking or bicycle parking After marking a place it was possible for the respondent to give additional information about the marking Parking places for cars, motor bikes and mopeds 13. A place with too few parking places 14. A place that has enough parking places 15. A place that has too many parking places Pyöräpysäköintipaikat 16. A place with too few places for bike parking 17. A place that has enough places for bike parking 18. A place that has too many places for bike parking

Current parking arrangements The respondents made 387 markings concerning parking arrangements Too many: 3 Enough: 4 Too few: 14 60 % of the markings concerned places with too few parking places. These markings were concentrated in the areas near the university building 182 markings made by 83 respondents Too many: 3 Enough: 1 Too few: 24 Too many: 3 Liian vähän: 24 Too few: 9 Too many: 16 Enough: 6 Too few: 70 Too few: 8 Too many: 12 Enough: 15 Too few: 3 Too many : 3 Enough: 3 Too few: 28 Too many: 10 Enough: 35 Too few: 2

Current bicycle parking arrangements 213 markings concerning bicycle parking arrangements were marked on the map 63 % of the markings concerned places with too few bicycle parking places. These markings were concentrated in the areas near the university building 85 markings made by 83 respondents

Parking arrangements: the university area Parking Bicycle parking

5. Linnanmaa and Kaijonharju in the future The respondents were asked to mark places that could, in their opinion, be developed in some way. After marking a place it was possible for the respondent to give additional information about the marking 18. A place where new housing could be planned - What kind of housing could be planned here? 19. A place that needs new commercial spaces or services - What kinds of commercial spaces or services are needed here? 20. A place that needs new workplaces or business spaces - What kinds of workplaces or business spaces are needed here? 21. A place which should be developed for recreational use - How should the opportunities for recreation be developed? 23. A new idea - What could be developed here?

Housing 263 places in which new housing could be planned were marked on the map The markings concentrated on the southwestern side of the university building, the parking area east of the university building, in the Kaijonharju center area and on the northern sides of Syynimaa and the Technology village According to the responses the area needs more apartment buildings and student housing Several respondents hoped to see buildings with commercial spaces on the first floors and housing on the higher floors

Commercial spaces and services Markings about commercial spaces and services concentrated in: The center of Kaijonharju The center should be developed and revived. All of the services should not move to Prisma. Between the center of Kaijonharju and the university building In the university building The campus and the areas in close vicinity need more cafes and restaurants, a gym, a book store... On the southern side of the Linnanmaa sports hall In the areas close to Prisma City center-like buildings, a restaurant, hotel New shops Lunch restaurant, a small grocery store, a kiosk, paper shop Swimming pool, multipurpose hall New buildings on the parking area, commercial spaces on the first floors Pharmacy, shops, cafés, restaurants, post office, hairdresser, Lidl, flea market Swimming pool, places for sports, a restaurant Student-based commercial spaces, opportunities for pop-upactivities

Workplaces and business spaces The markings concentrated in The center of Kaijonharju Functions as varied as possible, also workplaces The southwestern side of the university building Companies that benefit from the vicinity of the university, an extension of the technology village? The technology village Developing the old tecnology village and bringing new businesses to the campus area On the western side of the road Ritaharjuntie

Recreation In general, the respondents hoped that green areas would be tidied up and maintained 50 % of the markings concerned the development of the shores of Kuivasjärvi and Pyykösjärvi The suggested functions included beaches, running paths, boating, places for campfires, ski tracks, piers and places for spending time Improving the visibility of the lakes New outdoor and indoor sports venues were hoped for to the south of Linnanmaantie road In addition, some respondents hoped that the botanical garden and zoo areas would be developed for recreational use Development of recreational use Maintained paths and park areas Swimming pool, outdoor and indoor sports venues Tidying up the shore, public routes, places for spending time Tidying up the shore, public routes, places for spending time

New ideas 53 map markings were given concerning new ideas. Introduced new ideas included, among others: A hotel close to the university building Using the outdoor areas of the campus An arena for events A square for events Parking places (underground parking, parking facility, parking tower) Preservation of the beautiful forests An animal museum A disc golf course A tram stop

Free feedback In the end of the survey the respondents were asked to give free feedback concerning the development of Linnanmaa and Kaijonharju district areas. The following themes were repeated in the responses: The areas strengths are its greenness and the vicinity of the nature The area needs renewing and a facelift. Especially the center of Kaijonharju needs to be cleaned and modernized. More housing is needed, especially for students The center of Kaijonharju and the university building need more services The biking-, walking- and public transport connections need to be developed More parking places are needed The lake shores could be used as recreational areas more than nowadays The area is situated between two lakes and in the vicinity of a botanical garden, which are unique natural values., Dense housing construction and Oulu's low rental rates are good things concerning the attractiveness of education and the houses can also be high. Public transport must be smooth and cycling effortless, the cyclists should also be able to drive with high speeds. Swimming pool would be a great thing. Parking spaces as much as possible, with emphasis on public transport and cycling. Services for people. " "The upcoming super-campus needs unprejudiced solutions for parking areas, public transport, services, student housing and business co-operation.... In addition, the recreational use of the lakes could really be developed and the botanical garden with its surroundings could, if refurbished, create a pleasant green oasis in the area.