Marinas, Mooring and Boating Facilities 23

Similar documents
9 Pershore. Introduction. Pershore Abbey

Annex B: SWDP Objectives mapped against Worcestershire SCS Objectives. Annex B: SWDP Objectives mapped against Worcestershire SCS Objectives

Droitwich Spa 6. Reasoned Justification

Neighbourhood Plan Representation

Evesham 7. Reasoned Justification

What do you like about South Marston?

B - Coalfield River Corridor Landscape Character Type

Welford-on-Avon Neighbourhood Plan Consultation Event Sunday, 6 April Your name Your address

Planning and Sustainability Statement

STATEMENT OF OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF LAND AT CHURCH CLIFF DRIVE FILEY

DevelopmentPlan SOUTH WORCESTERSHIRE

policy requirements: developer to prepare masterplan / development brief to be agreed with the Council who may adopt this as Supplementary Guidance.

Reference: 16/1234/HSE Received: 25th February 2016 Accepted: 2nd March 2016 Ward: High Barnet Expiry 27th April 2016

Clean version of the Submission Document (CD001) showing all changes from submission up to 7 October 2015 STILL SUBJECT TO CHANGE

South Worcestershire Development Plan. South Worcestershire Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document

Introduction. Grounds of Objection

ALLERTHORPE NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN

2. The application, which is a full plans application, is for a commercial development comprising B1, D1, D2 and A3 uses.

18 Birkbeck Road London NW7 4AA. Reference: 15/02994/HSE Received: 14th May 2015 Accepted: 26th May 2015 Ward: Mill Hill Expiry 21st July 2015

6B Bertram Road London NW4 3PN

About 10% of the Borough's population lives in the seven rural parishes. Population figures from the 1991 census are given below:-

Public Consultation. Land at Monks Farm, North Grove. Welcome

SHORELINE, FLOOD AND COASTAL DEFENCE MANAGEMENT PLANS

Development in the Green Belt

South Worcestershire Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document

Brookside Walk Children's Play Area, London, NW4

Site Assessment Technical Document Appendix A: Glossary

South Worcestershire Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document

DUNSFOLD NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN Site Selection Policies

6. THE COAST POLICY INDEX

WATERWAYS & DEVELOPMENT PLANS

an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

Development in the setting of the Cotswolds AONB

The Gwennap Parish Vision Statement

Canal & River Trust response to the Consultation on the Working Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Report

ASSESSMENT OF LOCAL GAPS IN BREDON PARISH

Rotherhithe Rotherhithe Area Vision Map

Policy DM19: Development and Nature Conservation

A. The sites in Table 16 below, as identified on the Policies Map, are allocated for retail-led development:

LETTER OF OBJECTION LAND TO THE SOUTH WEST OF FORGE GARAGE, HIGH STREET, PENSHURST, KENT, TN11 8BU

6.0 Development of Amenities,

To secure a Green Belt around Cambridge whose boundaries are clearly defined and which will endure for the plan period and beyond.

Copyright Nigel Deeley and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence

Ground Floor Flat 15 Redbourne Avenue London N3 2BP

Neighbourhood Planning Local Green Spaces

RULE 6 (6) STATEMENT OF CASE

Green Infrastructure planning must be evidence led, thus the importance of this stage in collating your information and responses.

Derry City and Strabane District Council Planning Committee Report

SWLP 42: Worcester City Centre

Parish of Repton NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Canterbury City Council Military Road Canterbury Kent CT1 1YW. Title: CA/16/02745/ADV. Author: Planning and Regeneration.

A428 Cambourne to Cambridge Better Bus Journeys Landscape and Planning Appraisal Cambridgeshire County Council. January 2017

BLACKHEATH SQUASH CLUB Blackheath Sports Club, Rectory Field, Charlton Road, London, SE7 7EY. Planning, Design and Access Statement

Landscape and Heritage A Park landscape that embraces the physical, cultural and social heritage of the area

Basic Conditions Statement Exmouth Neighbourhood Plan

Land Adj. 63 Sunny Bank Road, Sutton Coldfield, Birmingham, B73 5RJ

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Executive Director (Operational Services)/ Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities)

List of Policies. SESPlan. None applicable. Consolidated Scottish Borders Local Plan 2011: POLICY G1 - QUALITY STANDARDS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT

WELCOME TO THE NEW WILTON PARK

22.15 OUTDOOR ADVERTISING SIGNAGE POLICY

A Response Objecting to Outline Planning Application by Hallam Land Ltd.

PLANNING COMMITTEE DATE: 07/09/2015 REPORT OF THE SENIOR MANAGER PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT SERVICE CAERNARFON. Number: 4

3/29 Rhu Marina Reporter David Russell. Body or person(s) submitting a representation raising the issue (including reference number):

3. STATEMENTS OF DESIRED CHARACTER FOR PLANNING AREAS AND PRECINCTS

DISCUSSION TOPIC: ST JOHNS RIVER & ITS TRIBUTARIES (BPII) 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICES AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

Keystone Business Park Precinct Structure Plan North East Industrial Precinct. Part 2 Design Principles

Case Officer: Sarah Kay File No: CHE/14/00515/REM Tel. No: (01246) Plot No: 2/6132 Ctte Date: 15 th September 2014 ITEM 1

Garages To Rear Of The Willows 1025 High Road London N20 0QE

3 Abbey View Mill Hill London NW7 4PB

an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision date: 13 February 2018

York Road Arial View

Rochford District Council Allocations Development Plan Document: Discussion and Consultation Document Sustainability Appraisal

5 Gratton Terrace London NW2 6QE. Reference: 17/5094/HSE Received: 4th August 2017 Accepted: 7th August 2017 Ward: Childs Hill Expiry 2nd October 2017

5 PLANNING ANALYSIS 5.1 THE SITE AND ITS DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT

+ Cllr Ken Pedder - Chairman + Cllr Cathie Whitcroft - Vice-Chairman

Fingal Development Plan & Green Infrastructure. Nicholas O Kane Senior Executive Planner Fingal County Council

Site ref: AS06 Site Name or Address: Murreys Court, Agates Lane

DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT

UTT/17/2075/FUL - (BERDEN) (Referred to Committee by Councillor Janice Loughlin. Reason: In the Public Interest)

Overview Report. Proposed Development

Regulatory Committee. Date of Meeting 9 June 2016

Planning Committee 04/02/2015 Schedule Item 6. Smith Farm Estate, Old Bridge Close, Northolt, UB5 6UA.

2014/0590 Reg Date 26/06/2014 Chobham

Guide. Guide to Regional Planning Policies. Background

H7 Open Space zones. (a) provide for the needs of the wider community as well as the needs of the community in which they are located;

an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

Manor House Main Street Sedgeberrow Worcestershire WR117UE

Hobart A Strategic Framework

University Park, Worcester Non Technical Summary December 2011

Derry City and Strabane District Council Planning Committee Report

Newcourt Masterplan. November Exeter Local Development Framework

A Growing Community Rural Settlement Areas

PLANNING DECISION NOTICE

Shoreline Master Program Town of La Conner, Washington

Sustainability Statement. Whitby Business Park Area Action Plan

1 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans:

2014/0943 Reg Date 06/11/2014 Lightwater

OKEFORD FITZPAINE NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN

Schedule of Planning Applications Committee Date: 23 May Reference: 06/17/0726/F Parish: Hemsby Officer: Mr J Beck Expiry Date:

Tennis Court Rear Of 3-5 Corringway London NW11 7ED

Transcription:

195 Marinas, Moorings and Waterfronts 23.1 The valleys of the River Severn, River Avon, River Teme and their tributaries significantly define the natural character of South Worcestershire, whilst the canal networks reflect a legacy of the localities industrial heritage. The use of the waterways can provide opportunities for recreational, tourism and commercial activities for the benefit of the community and local economy. In turn there are opportunities to enhance the quality of river frontages within the urban areas and on a wider scale improve access along the length of South Worcestershire's waterways. 23.1 SWDP 39: Waterfronts 23.2 The purpose of this policy is to ensure that development proposals are appropriate in their use and design and establish a relationship with the waterway. In order to achieve locations with a strong sense of place it will be expected that new development incorporates a mix of uses, i.e. residential, employment and leisure/retail to create areas of activity and vibrancy as well as ensuring connectivity to the existing main centres. 23.3 In developing schemes regard should be had to the Worcester City Centre Supplementary Planning Document and other adopted guidance for the river/canal frontages prepared by the relevant Local Authority, e.g. the Evesham Riverside Framework, Droitwich Canals Supplementary Planning Guidance. 23.4 Development proposals along the rivers must also take into account flood risk as well as policies on the protection of the flood plain and flood defences. SWDP 39: Waterfronts The waterfront locations at Droitwich Spa, Evesham, Pershore, Tenbury Wells, Upton-upon Severn and Worcester will be protected and enhanced by: Ensuring development establishes a relationship with the waterway and takes full advantage of its location, addressing the waterway as a frontage, opening up views and access to them; Encouraging development which includes a mixture of uses, including uses which enable the public to enjoy the riverside, e.g. leisure especially at ground level in buildings fronting the waterway, public spaces or squares;

196 23 Marinas, Mooring and Boating Facilities Protecting the history and heritage of the waterway, including landscape features, important structures and archaeological resources associated with the waterway and ensuring new development incorporates existing features; and Protecting and improving access points to the waterway, including paths, towpaths, cycle routes, facilities for launching boats. 23.5 The Preferred Option policy for Waterfronts supports the following objectives: River Severn, near Worcester Economic success that is shared by all objectives 1, and 4; A better environment for today and tomorrow objectives 1, 2, 3 and 4; Improving health and well-being objective 2. 23.6 Development Management decisions could be based upon national planning policy. This would result in an absence of local planning policy to compliment strategies by other agencies/organisations, e.g. The British Waterways, Environment Agency. 23.2 SWDP 40: Marinas and Moorings 23.7 A marina is an area which can contain a large number of moorings with supporting facilities such as boat sales, repair facilities, chandlery, club house, car parking and sewage disposal points. They may also offer a full range of boat storage and shore facilities for the boat user and provide a focus for waterway traffic. Such development therefore can have an urban appearance and generate significant road traffic movements and is generally considered inappropriate in rural areas. Within or adjoining an existing built-up area, however, a marina can, if well designed, be a positive asset. However, where existing or historical facilities are located in smaller settlements or rural areas it may be appropriate to support the development of larger or more permanent marina facilities in the context of this policy.

197 River Festival, Droitwich 23.8 Boating stations consist of off-river moorings under shore surveillance with facilities concerned with running repairs and the maintenance of boats, together with sewage disposal points, fuel and water supplies. 23.9 Recreational boat users require short stay or overnight moorings where the only facilities necessary are mooring posts and preferably public footpath access. However, moorings, collectively, can have a negative impact on the landscape of the waterway. It is, therefore, important to restrict the development of permanent or residential moorings to basins, marinas and urban locations or sites used historically for the function. Lines of permanent moorings can be visually intrusive and will not normally be permitted. Off waterway moorings however in basins and cuts may have less visual impact and would aid the flow of waterway traffic and visual appearance of the bank or towpath. 23.10 The development of moorings, other than overnight stays, will be judged on their merits, having regard to their impact on the landscape, access and parking arrangements and the number of existing moorings in the vicinity. Overnight or short-stay moorings will be permitted where they can be accommodated without harm to the character of the waterway and the local area and, usually, where there is public footpath access. SWDP 40: Marinas and Moorings Proposals for marinas, boating stations and permanent moorings including new build structures or extensions to existing structures will be permitted where they: will meet a proven need; are required for the proper functioning of an existing or new facility or to enhance and improve access to the waterway; pay regard to all potential users of the waterway and will not result in conflicting uses or unacceptable environmental consequences; marinas should be located away from the main navigation channel of the waterway (i.e. in a dock or marina) and the presence of a boat should not interfere with navigation.

198 23 Marinas, Mooring and Boating Facilities are located within or adjoining a settlement boundary or, in the case of moorings, at a location where there are existing authorised uses for mooring and boating facilities. make provision for public access through the delivery of new or enhanced footpaths and cycleways. in the case of moorings, are for short stay moorings subject to the number and capacity of existing provision, impact on the landscape and provision for access. provision of access, servicing and car parking can be made in a form which would not adversely affect amenity, particularly that of the waterway. the site has adequate land-based utility infrastructure and support facilities, including sewage, waste, water, secure storage and washing. Mooring facilities at Diglis marina, Worcester 23.11 The Preferred Option policy for Marinas and Moorings supports the following objectives: A better environment for today and tomorrow objectives 1, 2 and 4; Improving health and well-being objective 2. 23.12 Development Management decisions could be based upon national planning policy. This would result in an absence of local planning policy to compliment strategies by other agencies/organisations, e.g. The British Waterways, Environment Agency.

199 23.3 SWDP 41: Residential Moorings Residential Moorings 23.13 Residential moorings for live aboard and houseboats (i.e. more permanently moored vessels) may contribute to the overall housing stock. Although the opportunities are limited there are a number of positive benefits that include: Being provided for a limited period of time (i.e. running for a fixed term usually 25 years) without necessarily causing a significant impact on the environment; Overlooking and thus increasing the safety of otherwise potentially secluded areas. 23.14 Therefore, there may be scope for a limited number of residential moorings, as part of a marina or basin or on the waterways that run through the main urban areas of South Worcestershire. The acceptability of proposals for such moorings will depend on site circumstances and whether they comply with other policies in the Development Plan. SWDP 41: Residential Moorings Planning permission will be granted for further residential moorings if: they do not conflict with the navigation authority or the Environment Agency s operational requirements; there is adequate servicing including water supply, electricity and disposal facilities for sewage and rubbish; there is adequate access and parking; and there will be no significant effect on the amenity and conservation interest of the waterway. 23.15 The Preferred Option policy for Residential Moorings supports the following objectives: Stronger communities objective 1; A better environment for today and tomorrow objectives 1, 4 and 5. 23.16 Development Management decisions could be based upon national planning policy. This would result in an absence of local planning policy to compliment strategies by other agencies/organisations, e.g. The British Waterways, Environment Agency.