Built in 1984, the meeting house is the third meeting house on a site acquired in 1668 as a burial ground. The building has low heritage significance.

Similar documents
Historical value The building is a rare example of a small, little altered meeting house of the eighteenth century. It has high historical value.

Historical Value As evidence of Quaker heritage in Wells extending over three hundred years, the meeting house has high historical value.

Friends Meeting House, Oakham. 59 South Street, Oakham, LE15 6BG. National Grid Reference: SK Statement of Significance

The meeting house is of low-key design typical of the inter-war period. It has an attractive appearance with a spacious interior and good amenities.

Quaker Meeting House, Ipswich. 39 Fonnereau Road, Ipswich, Suffolk, IP1 3JH. National Grid Reference: TM Statement of Significance

Friends Meeting House, Nottingham. 25 Clarendon Street, Nottingham, NG1 5JD. National Grid Reference: SK Statement of Significance

Friends Meeting House, Norwich. Upper Goat Lane, Norwich, Norfolk, NR2 1EW. National Grid Reference: TG Statement of Significance

Evidential value The meeting house site is likely to have low archaeological potential and the building has low evidential value.

A little-altered late eighteenth-century meeting house with attached burial ground, of high evidential, historical and aesthetic significance.

Friends Meeting House, Bardfield. Brook Street, Great Bardfield, Braintree, Essex, CM7 4RQ. National Grid Reference: TL

Friends Meeting House, Sunderland. 30 Roker Park Road, Sunderland, SR6 9PG. National Grid Reference: NZ Statement of Significance

Friends Meeting House, Broughton. Meeting House Lane, Little Broughton, Cockermouth, CA13 0YQ. National Grid Reference: NY

Friends Meeting House, Hartshill. 112 Castle Road, Hartshill, Nuneaton, CV10 0SG. National Grid Reference: SP Statement of Significance

Friends Meeting House, Brentford & Isleworth. Quakers Lane, London Road, Isleworth, London TW7 5AZ. National Grid Reference: TQ

Quaker Meeting House, Hereford. 21 King Street, Hereford, HR4 9BX. National Grid Reference: SO Statement of Significance

Friends Meeting House, Brighton. Ship Street, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 1AF. National Grid Reference: TQ Statement of Significance

Lancaster Conservation Area Appraisal. Character Area 8. Cathedral

Appendix 1: Site Inventory Form

DACORUM GOLDEN PARSONAGE Great Gaddesden Brief Description Principal Building: Approach: Stable block other utilitarian buildings: Walled Garden:

Urban Design Brief Woodland Cemetery Funeral Home 493 Springbank Drive

7.1 Area 1: Haslemere Conservation Area

Marlow Cemetery, Marlow

Historic England Advice Report 26 August 2016

CITY OF MIAMI CEMETERY 1800 N.E. 2 AVENUE

Surlingham Primary School. Grid Reference TG Is the building listed? no. Walnut Hill Surlingham

NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION FORM CONTINUATION SHEET ASSOCIATED PROPERTY TYPES

Harrow Lane, St Leonards-on-Sea, East Sussex, TN37 7JZ ERECTION OF 113 DWELLINGS TOGETHER WITH ESTATE ROADS (DETAILED SUBMISSION)

2bPlanning Scheme. Appendix. Conservation - Removal of Structures. Grangegorman

ST. LUKE'S. planning consent will not be given for residential uses of ground floor and basement premises currently in non-residential use;

PLANNING STATEMENT. Market House Market Place Kingston upon Thames KT1 1JS

PDP DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT

CHESHIRE HISTORIC TOWNS SURVEY

Architectural Inventory Form (page 1 of 5)

National Monuments in State Care: Ownership & Guardianship. Laois

High Speed Rail (London- West Midlands)

Useful Studio 1st Floor, The Clove Building 4 Maguire Street, Butler s Wharf London SE1 2NQ

2154 Dundas Street West Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act

Page 1 of 19 URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK FOR BOLTON STREET WATERFORD

Request Modification of Conditions of a Conditional Use Permit approved October 14, Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Stephen White

War Memorials A-Z AW.indd 1 12/04/ :06

Design Guidelines - 1 -

Kiltearn Old Kirk Gravestone Inscriptions

HERITAGE STATEMENT AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT HILLBARK FARMHOUSE FRANKBY

6. Design and Architectural Guidance

Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement Queen's Park

Character Area 1: Town Core

REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS HUDSON LIBRARY FIT OUT FOR MERIDEN SCHOOL, STRATHFIELD NSW

HERITAGE POLICY...Safeguarding the Built Heritage. Conservation Plans. A Guide to the Preparation of Conservation Plans

TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT SECTION 79 AND TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (INQUIRIES PROCEDURE) (ENGLAND) RULES 2000 STATEMENT OF CASE OF

National Monuments in State Care: Ownership & Guardianship. Tipperary North

Development Control Plan

Appraisal of proposed alterations to the boundary of Helmsley Conservation Area

Schedule of Planning Applications Committee Date: 23 May Reference: 06/17/0726/F Parish: Hemsby Officer: Mr J Beck Expiry Date:

Chicago Stock Exchange Trading Room Art Institute of Chicago Chicago, Illinois 1977

Cathedrals. Cathedrals means chair and was the seat of the local bishop Cathedrals were built to take the worshipper to heaven.

Stanton Drew Parish Neighbourhood Plan Landscape and Environment

EAST OF ENGLAND OFFICE

National Monuments in State Care: Ownership & Guardianship. Wexford

C h a p t e r 3 E V A L U A T I O N A N D D E S I G N A T I O N. Background

National Monuments in State Care: Ownership & Guardianship. Offaly

Sandall Park, Doncaster

College Green Project Environmental Impact Assessment Report

Conservation Section, Planning, Property, Enterprise & Economic Development Department, Civic Offices, Wood Quay, Dublin 8

Bel-Air Lexus Automobile Service Station

Houses on the Forest Edge

Midcounties Co-operative Society Ltd.

Heritage Designation Brief

INTRODUCTION CURRENT APPLICATION

HISTORIC TEXAS CEMETERY REQUEST FOR DESIGNATION

The Kent Compendium of Historic Parks and Gardens for Medway. Churchfields, Rochester

Northbury Farm, Castle End Road, Ruscombe, Berkshire

Heritage Property 70 Liberty Street (Central Prison Chapel)

HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY - BUILDING AND STRUCTURES

2014/0590 Reg Date 26/06/2014 Chobham

National Monuments in State Care: Ownership & Guardianship. Kildare

SAMPLE OF CURRENT PROJECTS. Page 1

GREENFORD HALL & ADJOINING LAND

Examination of South Cambridgeshire Local Plan

3. Neighbourhood Plans and Strategic Environmental Assessment

Greater London. Greater London 6/42 (D.01.M001) TQ

L 2-1 HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION. Cheyne Family Cemetery. Main Street South

Land off Nursery Road / Church Street, Lozells, Birmingham, B19. Erection of 5 no. dwellings and retention of area of public open space.

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE34.30, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on August 25, 26, 27 and 28, 2014 CITY OF TORONTO

St Marys Church Of England High School Downage London NW4 1AB

6: 2417 Fourth Line, Sixteen Hollow, Lion Valley Park

Archaeological evaluation at Willowdene, Chelmsford Road, Felsted, Essex

Higher Uppacott: A Dartmoor Longhouse

Garage Site, Foots Cray High Street, Sidcup, Kent, London Borough of Bexley

FIRST COCONUT GROVE SCHOOLHOUSE

Project Name: By These Hands: Vernacular Markers of Pensacola s Historic African. American Cemeteries

08 MARCH 2016 PLANNING COMMITTEE. 6N 15/1330 Reg d: Expires: Ward: GE. of Weeks on Cttee Day:

Request Conditional Rezoning (R-15 Residential to Conditional A-24 Apartment) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

11/04/2016. NPPF Paragraph 128. NPPF Paragraph 128. NPPF Paragraph 128. NPPF Paragraph 128. NPPF Paragraph 128

HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY - BUILDING AND STRUCTURES. Please send completed form to: National Register and State Register Coordinator,

National Monuments in State Care: Ownership & Guardianship. Roscommon

1407 Military Trail Zoning Amendment Application Final Report

London Borough of Barnet Hendon Cemetery and Crematorium. Choices after a funeral


Leicestershire and Rutland Gardens Trust Walled Kitchen Garden Register

Epsom Water Works, East Street, Epsom, Surrey

Transcription:

Friends Meeting House, Reigate 47 Reigate Road, Reigate, Surrey, RH2 0QT National Grid Reference: TQ 26184 50219 Statement of Significance Built in 1984, the meeting house is the third meeting house on a site acquired in 1668 as a burial ground. The building has low heritage significance. Evidential value As a modern building with some surviving basements of 1889, the meeting house has low evidential value. Historical value The meeting house has medium historical value, mainly due to its associations with the predecessor buildings and the generations of Quakers buried here. Aesthetic value The building was constructed in a style typical for the period. It has low aesthetic value. Communal value The meeting house continues over three hundred years of Quaker presence on the site. More recently, the meeting house has also been used by the local community and the residents of the attached flats. It has high communal value.

Part 1: Core data 1.1 Area Meeting: West Weald 1.2 Property Registration Number: 0004260 1.3 Owner: Friends Trusts 1.4 Local Planning Authority: Reigate and Banstead Borough Council 1.5 Historic England locality: South East 1.6 Civil parish: Reigate NPA 1.7 Listed status: Not listed 1.8 NHLE: N/a 1.9 Conservation Area: Chart Lane, Reigate 1.10 Scheduled Ancient Monument: No 1.11 Heritage at Risk: No 1.12 Date(s): 1983-4 1.13 Architect (s): Barber, Bundy & Partners 1.14 Date of visit: 11 September 2015 1.15 Name of report author: Johanna Roethe 1.16 Name of contact(s) made on site: Unaccompanied 1.17 Associated buildings and sites: Thomas Moore House 1.18 Attached burial ground: Yes 1.19 Information sources: Butler, D.M., The Quaker Meeting Houses of Britain, 1999, vol. 2, pp. 593-5 Stell, C., An Inventory of Nonconformist Chapels and Meeting-houses in Eastern England, 2002, p. 327 Historical account on local meeting website, http://www.reigatequakers.org.uk/history-ofreigate-quakers.php Local Meeting survey by Sarah Freeman, Richard Jennings and Raymond Dill, October 2015 Part 2: The Meeting House & Burial Ground: history, contents, use, setting and designation 2.1. Historical background In 1668, the present site was given by Thomas Moore, a local Quaker who had been convinced by George Fox, for use as a burial ground. Twenty years later, a first meeting house was built on the site (figure 1). From c.1694 this also included a dwelling. The first meeting house was demolished or burnt down in 1857. That year, a new meeting house was built by the Quaker architect William Beck at a cost of 2,600 (which included the purchase of extra land to the east) (figure 2). In 1872, this was extended, and again in 1889 when two classrooms over a basement were built. By 1983, the building was too small and was demolished. The current meeting house, the third on the site, was opened in 1984 (figure 3).

It was built to a design by the architects Barber, Bundy & Partners who also built 20 sheltered flats for the elderly on the site (known as Thomas Moore House, built for the Reigate Quaker Housing Association). Part of the new building was erected over the basement of the 1889 classrooms. Figure 1: Undated painting of the first meeting house built in 1688 (Local Meeting archive) Figure 2: Undated photo of the second meeting house built in 1857 (Local Meeting archive)

Figure 3: Plan of the current meeting house (north is at the top; not to scale) (Butler, The Quaker Meeting Houses of Britain, 1999, vol. 2, p. 595) Figure 4: Site plan showing the three burial grounds and the location of the three meeting houses on the site (north is at the bottom; not to scale) (Butler, The Quaker Meeting Houses of Britain, 1999, vol. 2, p. 594) 2.2. The building and its principal fittings and fixtures The meeting house is attached to the east end of Thomas Moore House. The meeting room is an octagonal room at the east; ancillary rooms are to the west. The external walls are faced in brown bricks in stretcher bond with panelled fascias. The pyramidal roof of the meeting room has artificial slates. The ancillary rooms are part of the two-storey Thomas Moore House whose upper floor is tile-hung on the north and east elevations. The interior of the meeting room has brick walls and brick piers between each bay, and a carpeted floor. The coved ceiling has a central panel of acoustic tiles. There are three large windows to the south and four smaller vertical windows to the north.

2.3 Loose furnishings There are two open-backed benches in the meeting room. 2.4. Attached burial ground (if any) The original burial ground was acquired in 1668 (figure 4). It was extended to the east in 1856 and to the southwest in 1857. On the oldest plot is a row of about 14 headstones which are leaning against the west wall in the northwest corner. Most are illegible; the legible ones date to the nineteenth century. The east burial ground (photo bottom right on p. 1) has 40 headstones in three rows, dating from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Most graves are in the largest burial ground at the south west, which is still in use (photo bottom left on p. 1). It has about 90 headstones in seven rows, dating from the late nineteenth to the twenty-first centuries. It also has plaques for ashes buried here. It is laid out as a garden with perimeter planting and a bench under a tree. Notable Quakers buried on the site include Thomas Dann (died 1882), the first mayor of Reigate; and Francis May (died 1885), cofounder of the match manufacturers Bryant and May. 2.5. The meeting house in its wider setting The meeting house and Thomas Moore House overlook Reigate Road to the north. To the east and west are buildings of the Reigate Grammar School. The near-triangular plot of the meeting house is bordered to the southeast by Church Walk which leads to the medieval church of St Mary Magdalene (grade II*) and its large cemetery. 2.6. Listed status The building is not listed and is not considered to be a candidate for listing. 2.7. Archaeological potential of the site The site has high archaeological potential due to the presence of burials and the sites of the previous two meeting houses. Part 3: Current use and management See completed volunteer survey 3.1. Condition i) Meeting House: Good ii) Attached burial ground (if any): Optimal/generally satisfactory 3.2. Maintenance The most recent quinquennial inspection took place in March 2015 (no copy seen). Its recommendations are currently under consideration. The meeting has sufficient money for the maintenance and repair of the building, largely from rental income. It has a five-year maintenance and repair plan. 3.3. Sustainability The meeting does not use the Sustainability Toolkit. It has implemented measures to reduce its environmental impact. These include: Climate change & energy efficiency: renewable energy provider (Good Energy) Resource use, recycling & waste management: Cistermiser fitted in urinal; more efficient heating system currently under consideration Building maintenance & refurbishment: installation of double-glazed windows

The meeting does not have an Energy Performance Certificate but would consider obtaining one. 3.4. Amenities The meeting has all the amenities it needs. These are all in the meeting house. There is no resident Warden. The meeting is accessible by public transport. There is parking on site as well as secure parking for bicycles. 3.5. Access The meeting house is accessible to people with disabilities. There is level access, an accessible toilet and a hearing loop. The improvement of facilities for partially-sighted people is in progress. A Disability Access Audit was conducted in 2006 and its recommendations have been implemented. Subsequently, the basement room was excluded from the rooms available for lettings as it was inaccessible for wheelchair users. 3.6 Community Use Friends use the meeting house for 3 hours per week. The building is theoretically available for community lettings for a maximum number of 96 hours (48 hours for 2 rooms) per week. It is used for an average of 35 hours per week. The meeting has a lettings policy. Users not in accord with Quaker values are not permitted. Smoking and intoxicants are not permitted on the premises. Free use is reserved for Quaker groups. Users value the meeting house for its competitive pricing and its convenient location for the surrounding residential areas. 3.7. Vulnerability to crime There are no signs of general crime or anti-social behaviour at the site. There has been no heritage crime, general crime or other incidents. The locality is generally well-cared for, has low crime levels, low deprivation and high community confidence. There is currently no liaison with the Local Neighbourhood Policing Team as there is no obvious need. 3.8. Plans for change There are no changes planned. Part 4: Impact of Change 4.1. To what extent is the building amenable or vulnerable to change? i) As a Meeting House used only by the local Meeting: The meeting house could be altered if required. Alterations to the external appearance might require conservation area consent. ii) For wider community use, in addition to local Meeting use: The meeting house is currently well used by community groups. Should demand on the current facilities change, the building could be altered if necessary. iii) Being laid down as a Meeting: Should the meeting house close, the future of the building would need to be considered in conjunction with that of Thomas Moore House. Redevelopment of the site would require conservation area consent. Part 5: Category: 4