CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING ON MONDAY AUGUST 28, 2017 JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

Similar documents
CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE ON TUESDAY MARCH 29, 2016

Cookstown Heritage Conservation District Study Public Consultation March 26, 2013

Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Roncesvalles Avenue

Memo. B R A Y H e r i t a g e

SUBJECT: Report recommending 563 North Shore Boulevard East remain on the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources

58: 1285 Sedgewick Crescent, Rotary Gardens

St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Focused Area - Official Plan Amendment Status Report

Long Branch Neighbourhood Character Guidelines Final Report

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act 844 Don Mills Road and 1150 Eglinton Avenue East

Blackfriars/Petersville Heritage Conservation District Study

TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS GUIDE

Purchase Proposal Call for the Former St. Louis School 75 Allen Street East Addendum #3 12-June-2013

Purpose of Report...1. Planning Framework Provincial Policy Statement Draft PPS...2. Ontario Heritage Act...3

52: 2182 Lakeshore Road East, Horizons

Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment

Cultural Heritage Landscapes Strategy

John M. Fleming Managing Director, Planning and City Planner. Old East Village Dundas Street Corridor Secondary Plan Draft Terms of Reference

43: 2165 Dundas St. West, Smith-Carrique Barn and Shed

11: 210 Lakeshore Road East, Towne Square

TOWN OF AURORA ARCHITECTURAL SALVAGE PROGRAM GUIDE

L 4-1. Heritage Report: Reasons for Heritage Designation. Kodors House. 35 Rosedale Avenue West

Mayfield West Phase 2 Secondary Plan

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Garden District Heritage Conservation District Study

Toronto Preservation Board Toronto and East York Community Council. Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division

Agenda Item # Page # RECOMMENDATION

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

The Corporation of the TOWN OF MILTON

Cultural Heritage Landscape Heritage Impact Statement Terms of Reference

9: 204 & 240 Front Street, George Street Parkette & Dingle Park. 1. Description of Property. Name (if applicable) Legal Description

Cultural Landscape Heritage Impact Statement Terms of Reference

Municipal Inventory of Cultural Heritage Properties - St. Joseph Inventory of Designated and Potential Heritage Properties

150 Eighth Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

6: 2417 Fourth Line, Sixteen Hollow, Lion Valley Park

Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement Queen's Park

APPENDIX 9 HERITAGE CHARACTER

Chapter 6 cultural heritage

Conservation Area Designation, amendments and Review

1071 King Street West Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Historic Yonge Street HCD Plan Community Consultation October 14, 2015

Cookstown Heritage Conservation District Plan Heritage Workshop Public Open House September 10, 2013

Cultural Heritage Resources

CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES POLICIES

57: 2031 North Service Road West, Hilton Farm

Report to Planning and Environment Committee

ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD

646 Kingston Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

2: Bond Street, I.O.F Orphanage

Heritage Oshawa Meeting

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

Architectural Inventory Form

CITY OF VAUGHAN REPORT NO. 5 OF THE HERITAGE VAUGHAN COMMITTEE

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

KLEINBURG-NASHVILLE AREA HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT STUDY AND PLAN PURSUANT TO PART V OF THE ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT

Part A. District Overview. Thornhill-Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan 1

HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION. 62 Union Street. Prepared By:

2154 Dundas Street West Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act

Queen Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Ordnance Street 110 Plan OS Lot 413 B202; parts of Lot 412 and portion of Lot 413

To: Related to Item 2 of the Fourth Report of Heritage Oshawa (DS ) Memorandum. Re: Date: August 25, File: B

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

Review of Demolitions and Certificates of Non-Historic Status

Wellington Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Master Environmental Servicing Plan & Secondary Plan

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

COUNCIL POLICY 19(35) AND 19(35A) RELATING TO THE URBAN DESIGN AWARDS PROGRAM

Heritage Property 70 Liberty Street (Central Prison Chapel)

Designation. under the Ontario Heritage Act. September 29, 2018 Sarnia, Ontario by Paul R. King Community Heritage Ontario Board Member

Authority: North York Community Council Item 31.7, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on May 6, 7 and 8, 2014 CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No.

This property contributes to the historic streetscape of Colborne Street and its striking architecture makes it a landmark along the street.

Town of Cobourg Heritage Master Plan. Statutory Public Meeting

Official Plan Amendment to Further Protect Heritage Views of City Hall, Old City Hall and St. James Cathedral - Preliminary Report

DESIGN REVIEW PANEL PROCEDURES AND PROTOCOL

CITY OF VAUGHAN REPORT NO. 9 OF THE HERITAGE VAUGHAN COMMITTEE

HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT

21: Sovereign Street, Streetscape

112 College Street Zoning Amendment Application Preliminary Report

Architectural Inventory Form

49 to 51 Camden St - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

a) buildings, structures and artifacts of historical significance;

King-Spadina HCD Study

Architectural Inventory Form

IMPORTANT NOTICE. Architectural Inventory Form COLORADO CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY I. IDENTIFICATION th Street 5WL.5601

7437, 7439 and 7441 Kingston Road - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - Preliminary Report

Garden District Heritage Conservation District Study

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE34.30, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on August 25, 26, 27 and 28, 2014 CITY OF TORONTO

Access not granted, notes and photographs from the street Sept (AB) Current Use

North York Community Council. Director, Community Planning, North York District. Ward No. 26, Don Valley West

Meeting Agenda. Business Items

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE GEORGE KOTSIFAS MANAGING DIRECTOR, DEVELOPMENT & COMPLIANCE SERVICES & CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL

5959 Yonge Street Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report

Architectural Inventory Form

Planning Department. Director of Planning. Manager of Planning. Planning Technician/ Sustainability Coordinator. Planner II/ Heritage Coordinator

NEW EDINBURGH HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

The Director of Development Planning and Manager of Urban Design and Cultural Heritage recommends:

Historic Resources Inventory Evaluation Form

REPORT FOR ACTION SUMMARY

Transcription:

TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING ON MONDAY AUGUST 28, 2017 JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER REQUEST FOR DEMOLITION OF HERITAGE LISTED PROPERTY AT 440 GREY STREET BY: TARLOK LAIL RECOMMENDATION That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning & City Planner, with the advice of the Heritage Planner, with respect to the request for the demolition of a heritage listed property located at 440 Grey Street, the following actions BE TAKEN: a) That 440 Grey Street BE REMOVED from the Inventory of Heritage Resources (the Register); b) That the Chief Building Official BE ADVISED that Municipal Council consents to the requested demolition on this property; c) That Heritage Planning Staff BE ALLOWED to photo-document the interior of the building as well as the rear outbuilding on the property; and, d) That the property owner BE REQUESTED to salvage the buff brick masonry for retention and/or donation to restore/reuse centres in the City. PURPOSE AND EFFECT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION The recommended action would remove the property from the Inventory of Heritage Resources (the Register) pursuant to Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act) and allow the requested demolition to proceed. PREVIOUS REPORTS PERTINENT TO THIS MATTER None. BACKGROUND Location 440 Grey Street is a property located on the north side of Grey Street, between Maitland and Colborne Streets in the SoHo District. The Beth Emanuel Church (and site of the relocated formative Fugitive Slave Chapel) is located several properties to the west of 440 Grey Street [Appendix A]. It is currently listed as a single-family dwelling. 1

Property The property is included on the Inventory of Heritage Resources which was adopted as the Register in 2007. It is listed as a priority 3 resource. Priority 3 buildings may not be worthy of individual designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, but may merit designation as part of a group of buildings as part of a Heritage Conservation District (City of London Inventory of Heritage Resources, np). Description The building located at 440 Grey Street is a one-storey, buff London brick Ontario Cottage circa 1880. It exhibits many of the characteristics of this architectural style including a square plan, low, hipped roof, and symmetrical façade with a central doorway that is flanked by two identical windows. The façade is three-bay and well-proportioned, with a small gable over the front entrance. The two front windows appear to be original two-over-two sash windows (w/newer storms added), and curved segmented brick coursing at window heads. Some windows at the east and west elevations appear to be newer replacement windows. What appears to be a Mason s mark is found at the front east corner, about 3-0 above grade [Appendix B]. There is a partial height basement at the rear of the building. The back property and interior of the building were not viewed during the site visit on July 27 th due to the absence of the applicant, which would have allowed for fuller access of the property. An outbuilding at the rear of the property is of note as its construction possibly coincides with that of the primary building (Insurance Plan, 1912 Rev. 1915). 440 Grey Street is a very modest, working-class home of the period, and many of the property s early residents were labourers working at the Grand Trunk and Grand Western Railway, General Steel Wares Ltd and McClary Mfg. (City Directory). There are though, several attributes adding embellishment to this modest cottage that are of particular note. These include original panelled entrance door surround, transom etched coloured glass illustrating the house number, rounded brick arched window opening in centre gable, and stringer brickwork creating a panelled pilaster effect on the front façade. 442 Grey Street is a mirror twin of 440, but it has undergone alterations to the exterior brickwork, window openings, front entrance and gable so that little remains of what were probably once details that were shared with 440 Grey Street. The area surrounding 440 Grey Street is commonly known as the SoHo (South of Horton) Neighbourhood, and has existed within the same boundaries since London s inception in 1840. Historically, this area has been associated with the Black settlement in London during the mid-1800 s, and its early days as a place of refuge on the Underground Railroad. Over half of the properties in and around 440 Grey Street still remain and date from well before 1900. Demolition Request A request for the demolition of the heritage listed property was submitted by the owners on July 10, 2017 and deemed complete on July 24, 2017. A request for the demolition of a heritage listed property must be resolved by Municipal Council within a 60-day period and must provide for a public participation meeting before the Planning and Environment Committee and consultation with the London Advisory Committee on Heritage. If Municipal Council does not make a decision on the demolition request by September 22, 2017, the request is deemed permitted. 2

POLICY REVIEW Section 2.6.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) directs that significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved. Significant is defined in the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) as, in regards to cultural heritage and archaeology, resources that have been determined to have cultural heritage value or interest for the important contribution they make to our understanding of the history of a place, and event, or a people. The objectives of Chapter 13 (Heritage) of the City of London s Official Plan (1989, as amended), as well as the policies of The London Plan (adopted 2016), comply with these policies. The Strategic Plan for the City of London 2015-2019 identifies heritage conservation as an integral part of Building a Sustainable City. Register Municipal Council may include properties on the Register that it believes to be of cultural heritage value or interest. These properties are not designated, but are considered to have potential cultural heritage value or interest. 440 Grey Street is considered to have potential cultural heritage value or interest as a heritage listed property. CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION In the Inventory of Heritage Resources, it states that further research is required to determine the cultural heritage value or interest of heritage listed properties. The potential cultural heritage value or interest of the property at 440 Grey Street was determined using the criteria of the Ontario Heritage Act Regulation 9/06. These criteria determine cultural heritage value or interest of individual properties based on the following: i. Physical or design value; ii. Historical or associative value; and/or, iii. Contextual value. A property is required to meet one or more of the abovementioned criteria to merit protection under Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. Should the property not meet the criteria for designation, the demolition request should be granted. A site visits was undertaken by the Heritage Planner on July 27, 2017. A brief summary of the evaluation is provided below: Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest Criteria Evaluation The Is a rare, unique, representative property or early example of a style, type, has design expression, material, or value or construction method physical throughout the City. value Displays a high degree of because it, craftsmanship or artistic merit This modest, vernacular labourer s Ontario Cottage is a common style or type in London, with many examples found The exterior masonry shows a degree of craftsmanship (as 3

The property has historical value or associative value because it, The property has contextual value because it, Demonstrates a high degree of technical or scientific achievement Has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community Yields, or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture Demonstrates or reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is significant to a community Is important in defining, maintaining, or supporting the character of an area Is physically, functionally, visually, or historically linked to its surroundings Is a landmark noted by what appears to be a Mason s mark), but it is not outstanding. No evidence of a high degree of technical or scientific achievement was found. Other than its relationship as part of the broader SoHo Neighbourhood and early development in London, the building is not known to have any significant historical associations. In and of itself, 440 Grey Street is not believed to yield or have the potential to yield information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture. The building at 440 Grey Street is vernacular and not attributed to a particular builder or architect. 440 Grey Street is located in the SoHo Neighbourhood (identified as a future HCD study area) and contributes to the common vernacular of modest workingman s cottages in the area This property does not display any unique, significant, or outstanding links to its surroundings. This property is not believed to be a landmark. Consultation Pursuant to Council Policy for the demolition of heritage listed properties, notification of the demolition request was sent to 112 property owners within 120m of the subject property on August 9, 2017, as well as community stakeholders including the Architectural Conservancy Ontario London Region, London & Middlesex Historical Society, and the Urban League. Notice was also published in The Londoner on August 10, 2017. At the time of writing, no replies have been received seeking further information regarding this demolition request. The Stewardship Sub-Committee of the London Advisory Committee on Heritage (LACH) was consulted at its meeting on Wednesday July 26, 2017, and did not make a comment on the demolition request for 440 Grey Street. The Committee noted that this property is within the SoHo area which is a future Heritage Conservation District Study Area. 4

CONCLUSION The building at 440 Grey Street has been evaluated using the mandated criteria of Ontario Heritage Act Regulation 9/06. The property did not meet the criteria for designation. Designation of this property under the Ontario Heritage Act is not recommended. Municipal Council should consent to the demolition of this property and advise the Chief Building Official accordingly. PREPARED BY: SUBMITTED BY: LAURA E. DENT, M.Arch, PhD, MCIP, RPP HERITAGE PLANNER URBAN REGENERATION JIM YANCHULA, MCIP, RPP MANAGER URBAN REGENERATION RECOMMENDED BY: JOHN M. FLEMING, MCIP, RPP MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER 2017-08-28 led/ Attach: Appendix A Maps Appendix B Images Y:\Shared\policy\HERITAGE\Heritage Alteration Permit Reports\Grey Street, 440\2017-08-28_PEC demo_440 Grey St_rev 2017-07-31.docx REFERENCES Reference Documents City Directory, multiple years. Cottage Country Cottages of South London, Architectural Conservancy of 5

Ontario, London Region Branch. June 6, 1999. Insurance Plan of the City of London. 1892 Rev. 1907; 1912 Rev. 1915; 1912 Rev. 1922. Inventory of Heritage Resources, City of London. 2006. Old House Dictionary. An Illustrated Guide to American Domestic Architecture 1600-1940, Steven J. Phillips. 1989. Roadmap SoHo Regeneration South of Horton Street, City of London, Planning and Development. 2011. SoHo London, SoHo Community Association. http://soholondon.ca/ Other Site visit July 27, 2016, and photographs of the same date. 6

APPENDIX A Maps Map 1: Property location of 440 Grey Street 7

Map 2: Aerial image of 440 Grey Street 8

APPENDIX B Images Image 1: 1912 Rev. 1915 Insurance Plan of the City of London, Ontario Image 2: Front elevation, 440 Grey Street 9

Image 3: Side elevation west, showing existing window openings Image 4: Side elevation east, showing existing window opening Image 5: Neighbourhood context Image 6: Transom with etched coloured glass Image 7: Centre gable with rounded head window 10

Image 8: Front east corner, showing Mason s mark on brick Image 9: Original wood panel door surround 11