glenwood canyon design process I-70 Statement of Direction TRG Recreation Subcommittee Colorado Division of Highways August 11, 1976 prepared by the

Similar documents
Chapter 5: Recreation

7.0 SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

Arkansas River Corridor

Rogue River Recreation and Access Management Plan- Table Rocks Reach. Jackson County, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, National Park Service

I. STAFF POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS. The following RMP policy strategies are proposed by staff in support of a Scenic Resource Protection Program:

Analysis of Landscape Character for Visual Resource Management 1

Canyon Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting March 18, 2016

Gather information from online resources covering the following topics:

RECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND GREENWAYS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

EL DORADO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT PRINCIPLE INTRODUCTION STATE AUTHORIZATION

Appendix D OUTDOOR RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE PLANNING OBJECTIVES, PRINCIPLES, AND STANDARDS FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY

Objective: Resolution to recommend adoption of the Big Thompson Assessment to the Planning Commission

Joe Pool Lake Lake Master Plan Public Information Meeting Presentation of Final Draft Revision July 31, 2018

RIVER RECREATION AND CONSERVATION: LESSONS FROM COLORADO S 2013 FLOODS

Master Plan for Preservation and Scenic Conservation (1995)

City of Missoula and Missoula County Open Space Planning Open House

Regulation Changes for Open Space and Similar Uses

Joe Pool Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 23, 2017

Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Draft Vers

A BLUEPRINT FOR BROCKTON A CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Public Information Meeting

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Transportation Chapter 1 - Introduction and Purpose of Planning to 1-3. Utilities

T O W N O F H I G H R I V E R

THREE-STEP DESIGN PROCESS FOR OPEN SPACE SUBDIVISIONS

Draft Stillwater 2030 Comprehensive Plan- Goals and Policies

Lewisville Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 2 & 4, 2017

FOUR MILE RUN VALLEY WORKING GROUP AND CHARGE

River Bend Area Plan Map Amendment ARPP Analysis Camp Fire Day Camp November 20, 2014

4.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL QUALITY

SEWRPC OUTDOOR RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE PLANNING OBJECTIVES, PRINCIPLES, AND STANDARDS

ROBERT SIBLEY VOLCANIC REGIONAL PRESERVE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT COMMUNITY MEETING #2 NOVEMBER 16, 2016

Public Visioning City of Kelso Planning Commission

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

2011 ASLA Design Awards

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

NORTHEAST RIVER CROSSING FUNCTIONAL PLANNING STUDY

PREVIOUS PUBLIC PARTICIPATION BRIEF October 2014

Chapter 5: Natural Resources and Environment

Preface. Erie. Scranton. Allentown. Pittsburgh. Harrisburg. Philadelphia

Memorandum Planning. Thursday, January 8, 2015

Executive Summary Purpose of the Plan Defining Open Space and Greenways

Visual Impact Rating Form - Instructions

systems is available on the Colorado Wetland Information Center (CWIC) website.

Woodland Conservation and the Master Plan

Authority of the General Plan

Staff will be providing an overview of the project need, purpose and intent for consideration as part of the Amendment cycle.

City of Surrey Ecosystem Management Study. Integration of ecological processes with land use

Northeast Everglades Natural Area

The Five Components of the McLoughlin Area Plan

Executive Summary and Introduction

Parks, Trails, and Open space Element

CONSERVATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

City of Surrey Ecosystem Management Study. Integration of ecological processes with land use

Policy & Procedure Effective Date: Parks Department Page of

TOWN OF SPRINGFIELD, NEW HAMPSHIRE

-MENDOCINO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES- DIVISION II OF TITLE 20--COASTAL ZONING CODE

Lake O the Pines Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting April 25 & 27, 2017

Recreation Resources

Parks, Trails, and Open Space Element

M4 Corridor around Newport Environmental Statement Volume 3: Appendices

Toronto Parks Renaissance Strategy

CITY OF BEACON NOTICE TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS GENERAL INFORMATION AND REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

General Terms Property, as used to describe eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places:

OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 2800 Watkins Lake Road, Waterford, Michigan

Biology and Wildlife. Erosion, Drainage, and Storm water. Chavez Ranch Road Project Comment Response Table - Page 1 January 2017

Town of Rico Three Mile Plan for Annexation

Concept Master Plan. for. Draft of. Wildlife Management Area. Prepared for. June, 2008

Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

Whitemarsh Township Greenway Plan

OVERMOUNTAIN VICTORY TRAIL BURKE CALDELL CORRIDOR FEASIBLITY STUDY REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS CALDWELL COUNTY PATHWAYS

Development Reviews. An overview of the Commission s review process, primarily in Klickitat County. March 13, 2018

THE COMMUNITY-DRIVEN DESIGN PROCESS

Spring Creek Canyon. A Master Plan, Management Plan and Implementation Effort. Balancing the Demands on a Nationally Significant Resource

Saratoga Quarry Park Master Plan

Recreational and Visual Resources Study Plan

2011 ASLA Design Awards. Westside Creeks Restoration Plan Merit Award AECOM, Fort Collins. Planning & Urban Design

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Raystown Lake Master Plan Revision. Public Meeting April 25 & 26, 2018 How does the revision process work?

Mark Greenig Recreation and Land Use Planner CH2M Hill

6.8 SCENIC HIGHWAYS Introduction

Nantahala and Pisgah NFs Wilderness Evaluation Process

Preliminary Management Recommendations for the proposed Sedona Verde Valley Red Rock National Monument

FOUR MILE RUN VALLEY WORKING GROUP AND CHARGE Adopted April 16, 2016 Amended July 19, 2016

2011 ASLA Design Awards. Coyote Gulch Honor Award and Land Stewardship Designation Valerian LLC. Environmental Restoration and Reclamation

Call for Artists for: Design and Construction of Environmental Art Activation Story Mill Community Park, Bozeman, MT

City of Iowa City Department of Neighborhood and Development Services Department of Parks and Recreation Department of Public Works City Manager s

DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4

Planning for and Managing Open Space and Natural Areas

Community Conservation Workshop. Lake Placid

TOWN OF BETHLEHEM OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION PLAN PUBLIC MEETING: OCTOBER 12, 2017

DRAFT SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION KOLLINER PARK

Statewide Greenways Vision

Chapter 14. Shorelines

Open Space and Recreational Facilities

1. Parks & Recreation Neighborhood Parks Community Parks Special Use Sites 2. Open Space 3. Trails

Nicole Ryan Governmental Relations Manager Conservancy of Southwest Florida 1450 Merrihue Drive Naples, FL 34102

Saranac River Trail Greenway C O N D I T I O N S R E P O R T

Rural Land Use Designations Kittitas County December 6, 2007 Draft

Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and Scoping Meeting for the Canyon Lane Roadway Improvements Development Project

Pinellas County Greenways

Transcription:

glenwood canyon I-70 design process Statement of Direction TRG Recreation Subcommittee August 11, 1976 prepared by the TRG Recreation Subcommittee for the Colorado Division of Highways

glenwood canyon 1976 design process Statement of Direction TRG Recreation Subcommittee August 11, 1976 prepared by the TRG Recreation Subcommittee for the Colorado Division of Highways

STATEMENT OF DIRECTION TRG SUBCOMMITTEE ON RECREATION August 11, 197 6 INTRODUCTION U.S. Forest Service Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Outdoor Recreation Colorado Division of Wildlife Colorado Division of Highways Additional information is being obtained from the Colorado Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation as well as other public agencies and various private organizations and individuals. The Recreation Subcommittee was initially established to focus on recreation issues in order to expand upon and record the expressed concerns of various organizations regarding recreation and to report this information to the design team. It was found that these concerns were closely related to major issues being considered by all of the The Recreation Subcommittee was formed within the Technical Review Group to consider recreation issues related to existing and potential uses of the canyon, problems of highway access, and visual quality and esthetics. The following government agencies participate on the Subcommittee: -1-

groups involved in the design process and total integration of work was considered important. Consequently, the Subcommittee broadened the scope of its work to include the collection of baseline resource planning information for use by the CAC, the workshops, and the design team as well as the Subcommittee, in developing and analyzing alternative design concepts. The Subcommittee will use this information to formulate a comprehensive recreation program as a means of expressing the full recreation potential of the canyon. BASELINE STUDIES In the effort to objectively develop a recreation program, upon which detailed designs could be developed, the Subcommittee has delineated various areas of study. Data is being compiled on the following environmental, physical and recreational features of the Canyon. Existing Recreation Facilities & Use An inventory of the Canyon's existing facilities is being conducted to determine the range and extent of recreational activities in the Canyon. Land Ownership An inventory of the land ownership and status with regard to mining clains (present and future) of areas visible from within the Canyon. -2-

Geology Existing studies are being utilized to review the geologic character of the Canyon and to identify unusual geologic sites and conditions. Field studies are also being conducted to inventory in greater detail rock faces, talus slopes, and areas of unstable rock or talus slides. Fish & Wildlife The Subcommittee is mapping areas of wildlife movement and critical habitat and studying the relationship of such areas to existing and potential activity sites. Existing information is also being used to determine quality of the river habitat throughout the Canyon for fish, areas of prime fishing, and spawning grounds. Vegetation An inventory of vegetation in the Canyon is being made to evaluate ecological relationships, esthetics, revegetational requirements and educational use of plant communities. Natural Features Field surveys are being made of natural features such as stable rock faces for climbing, ice flows, springs, falls, caves and rapids. Visual Resources An inventory of view sheds and focal points is being conducted to identify areas of special visual sensitivity as well as areas with scenic overlook potential. -3-

Noise and Air Quality General information is being developed on existing air and noise quality levels within the Canyon with special attention given to the dispersion and attenuation characteristics of the Canyon. Historic and Anthropological Resources Backgound information is being developed on the natural characteristics of the Canyon before introduction of the railroad, power plant, dam and roadway. Information is also being gathered on the historic events and uses in the Canyon for potential use in interpretative facilities. Water Resources Data is being gathered to establish existing water quality, characteristics of the aquifers and upper elevation streams, and general hydrology information on the Colorado River and tributaries within Glenwood Canyon. Information is also being collected to establish the levels of water withdrawal and effects on water levels throughout the Canyon due to withdrawal and flooding. Recreation Demand As part of the recreation studies, the Subcommittee is developing data on the present and anticipated recreational demands placed on the Canyon by local, regional and national -4-

users. Demand information is being gathered from various areas including: Colorado Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan This plan, prepared in 1975, outlines outdoor recreation opportunities, needs, and problems in Colorado on a regional and statewide basis. Community Attitude Survey This survey, conducted in 1976 for the Glenwood Canyon project by SRI Community Response of Colorado, Inc., included questions regarding recreational usage and possible facility development in the Canyon. Local Field Surveys The Subcommittee is conducting a limited number of interviews with local residents living and working within the Canyon regarding their perception of recreational activities in the Canyon. Other Contacts and Discussions The Subcommittee is also contacting various local, State and national recreation interest groups in order to document the concerns of those organizations regarding recreational usage of the Canyon. PRELIMINARY DIRECTIONS On the basis of information gathered to date and in consideration of agencies stated positions, especially those with land ownership and land management functions within the -5-

Canyon, the following initial directions are being formulated: Bikeway A bicycle path the length of Glenwood Canyon would offer local, State and national cyclists a safe route through a scenic Colorado canyon for both loop and cross-country tours. Although it is recognized that engineering and design issues are yet to be resolved, information gathered to date indicates a strong demand to support the inclusion of a bikeway facility. Interpretative Facilities In an effort to enhance motorist's preception and appreciation of Glenwood canyon, the Subcommittee is considering the inclusion of interpretative facilities within the Canyon. While the extent and best use of such facilities has yet to be resolved, geological, historical and ecological aspects of the Canyon appear to be best suited for interpretation. Extent of Usage Concerns have been expressed by all members of the Subcommittee regarding the extent of recreation development in the Canyon. At this time, one aspect of recreational usage has been delineated. There is a strong desire to follow the general policy of the U.S. Forest Service and limit facilities within the Canyon to day-use activities. -6-

Rafter Access There is evidence from demand data gathered to date that a strong need exists for adequate access for commercial and private rafters. Facilities for this activity would include an unloading and staging area with adequate parking and rest rooms. Fishing Access Presently, there is a strong demand for acceptable fishing access within the Canyon. The Subcommittee is considering inclusion of a path along the mean flow line of sections of the Colorado River for those fishermen and other recreationalists wishing to reach the river's edge. Trail Access A number of trails connect the Canyon's rim and floor. Access to these trails is being studied. It is considered by the Subcommittee that access to existing trails and some new trails be maintained or improved. Picnicking The Canyon is presently being used for picnicking by a large number of motorists. Inclusion of this activity in any future recreation development plan is considered essential. Scenic Viewpoints and Overlooks Many portions of the Canyon have been identified as scenic or unique. Areas of special focus and attention should be made available to recreationalists. -7-

Similar to the purpose of interpretative facilities, overlooks would provide the motorist the opportunity to view the scenic quality of Glenwood Canyon. REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Subcommittee is also considering several issues which require broader analysis. We solicit your comments on the following issues: Boating The demand for water-oriented recreation facilities is high in Colorado. In the past, Glenwood Canyon, above Shoshone Dam, has offered marginal opportunity to water skiers and other boaters. It is the general feeling of the Subcommittee to limit this form of recreation and promote more passive forms such as canoeing and wakeless boating. Intensive Activity Center Concept A proposal under consideration at this time, is to allow passive recreation within the Canyon and intensify facility development in a more suitable area. An example of such an area could be the Golden Bair Ranch. Limiting development of intensive activities such as interpretative, primitive camping, rest area facilities, etc. to one site would allow retention of the Canyon for passive uses such as picnicking, fishing, hiking and trail access, scenic viewing, etc. and help preserve the Canyon's scenic quality. -8-

Use of Canyon Floor The Subcommittee is gathering the information necessary to evaluate alternative design concepts which would free portions of the Canyon floor for recreation. We would appreciate input from the CAC regarding directions for the type and level of recreation activity and the possible location of facilities. CONCLUSION Presently, the Subcommittee is preparing inventories, maps and documents on the various outlined environmental and demand factors. When these maps and documents reach a finished stage, they will be available to the CAC, the workshops, and the design team. Interim status reports will be made as appropriate to keep the CAC and design team informed of the Subcommittee's activities. As alternative highway design concepts are developed, the Subcommittee will use the information presently being prepared to formulate recreational programs for each of the concepts and assist in the evaluation of impacts on the recreational and esthetic qualities of the Canyon. -9-