AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION LEEDS AND LANGLEY BY-PASS, KENT

Similar documents
STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OLDWICK FARM, WEST LAVANT, WEST SUSSEX

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS BIRCH PIT, NEAR COLCHESTER ESSEX

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS LAND NEAR SHIRE HILL FARM SAFFRON WALDEN ESSEX

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION SEMI-DETAILED SURVEY EGG FARM KINGS LANGLEY HERTFORDSHIRE

Agricultural Land Classification and Statement of Physical Characteristics Higbfield Farm Whitley Bridge North Yorkshire October 1996

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION FAVERSHAM LOCAL PLAN

ADy^S. Whelpley Farm, Whiteparish, Wiltshire. Resource Plaiming Team Taunton Statutory Unit. November 93

HINCKLEY AND BOSWORTH LOCAL PLAN Land south of Earl Shilton - Site G Agricultural Land Classification February 1997

LAND NORTH OF TAMWORTH. Agricultural Land Classification ALC Map and Report April 1998

CORNFORTH EAST QUARRY COUNTY DURHAM

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

MAFF I^inistry of IfiriEE Agriculture Fisheries and Food

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS TYTTENHANGER QUARRY EXTENSION, LONDON COLNEY, HERTFORDSHIRE

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION GREAT GRIMSBY LOCAL PLAN SITE AG 2. GREAT COATES AUGUST 1993

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS EXTENSION TO CLOUD HILL QUARRY, BREEDON ON THE HILL, LEICESTERSHIRE

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION WITTON PARK, COUNTY DURHAM PROPOSED QUARRY EXTENSION DECEMBER 1992

STAFFORDSHIRE AND STOKE-ON- TRENT STRUCTURE PLAN Site 7: Priory Farm. Agricultural Land Classification ALC Map and Report November 1998

MAFF Ministry of Ifinil Agriculture Rsheries and Food

PROPOSED OPEN CAST COAL SITE SEPTEMBER 1992

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION VULCAN VILLAGE (PROPOSED GOLF COURSE) ST HELENS MBC

CAVIL HEAD OCCS ACKLINGTON NOVEMBER 1997

SUMMARY. alcholnie.doc\ih\jk

ACRE NOOK EAST QUARRY, CHELFORD, CHESHIRE. Statement of Site Physical Characteristics January 1998

MAFF Ministry of iflmll Agriculture Fisheries and Food

If A rr Ministry of. IfiriEI. Agriculture Fisheries and Food

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION REPORT LAND AT BRANT FARM, STOURPORT-ON-SEVERN

M AFT Ministry of Ifin&l. Agriculture Rsheries and Food

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS REPORT INCORPORATING AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION KNOWSLEY UDP, SITE 45.01

NORTH DEVON LOCAL PLAN: BARNSTAPLE AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION. Report of Survey 1. SUMMARY

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS REPORT INCORPORATING AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION LAND AT BOLE INGS, WESTBURTON, NOTTINGHAMSHIRE (SK805875)

HARRINGTON CEMENT WORKS, HASLINGFIELD ROAD, HARRINGTON, CAMBS. Agricultural Land Classification ALC Map and Soil Physical Characteristics Report

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION MID-BEDFORDSHIRE DISTRICT LOCAL FLAN

The entire site supports grass on which sheep had been grazing recently.

FROGS HALL FARM, TAKELEY, ESSEX. Agricultural Land Classification Report & Statement of Soil Physical Characteristics. May 1999

Oaklands College, St. Albans, Hertfordshire. Agricultural Land Classification & Soil Physical Characteristics Report.

PHYSICAL CHAtlACTERISTICS REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SAND AND GRAVEL SITE AT MANOR FARM, UFFINGTON

AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND NEAR MINDALE HOUSE PRESTATYN. Report 762/1

SOILS AND AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND OFF HOLT ROAD, ROSSETT. Report 1067/1

MAFF Ministry of Ifini.! Agriculture Fisheries and Food. (.L,^ fu Ai-c lot^sr

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

HUMBLEBURN OCCS, CRAGHEAD, COUNTY DURHAM SURVEY OF RESTORED LAND OCTOBER RPT Job Number: 73/97 MAFF Reference: EL LURET Job Number: ME3RTP

P/2014/00830 Received 27/06/2014 SOIL RESOURCES AND AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND AT ROLLESTON PARK FARM TUTBURY, STAFFORDSHIRE.

Grade. % of Survey Area 1. Staplehay. 2 3a. 3a 3b Non Ag Organ Ag Bldgs. 1 Non Ag Urban

Land Capability Classifications

Wooodside Lane-Kings Stanley. Agricultural Land Classification. September RPT Job Number; ^/98

ADAS rooo TARM NG LANO & LE SURC. West Dorset Local Plan Objector Sites. Agricultural Land Classification

STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MISSOURI ASSESSOR MANUAL

SOIL RESOURCES REPORT HALVERGATE MARSHES, NORFOLK 1. BACKGROUND

WHITWELL QUARRY, DERBYSHIRE

2014 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS. DERBYSHIRE MINERALS PLAN - EGGINTON (Shes A and B)

HAVANT BOROUGH LOCAL PLAN Site 43 Land at Manor Road, Hayling Island, Hampshire. Agricultural Land Classification ALC Map and Summary Report

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL ASSESSMENT

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No Waiau

2016 Iowa FFA Soils Evaluation CDE Exam

Unit II Soil Management

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 8. Sobig

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

Using Land Capability Classifications

Examining soils in the field. Examining soils in the field. Environment Agency thinksoils examining soils in the field

c?3a2-t)a3-<s^ BUCKINGHAMSHIRE MINERALS PLAN REVIEW LAND AT DENHAM MAFF Ministryof lfuu& Agriculture Fisheries and Food

Report on a soil survey and agricultural suitability investigation of the property known as Erf 660, De Doorns.

Iowa FFA Soil Career Development Event 2008

SOIL SURVEY OF PORTIONS 81 AND 82 OFTHE FARM VAALBANK 512JQ, NEAR MAGALIESBURG, SOUTH-WEST OF PRETORIA

2018 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam 1. Landscape positions characterizes the location of the soil on the landscape and identifies potential risks.

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 23. Waikiwi

Lesson 1: Recognizing the Characteristics of Soils and the Soil Requirements for Fruit and Nut Crops

27/01/2017. This event is being run by SAC Consulting. What is Soil?

IOWA FFA STATE SOILS CDE SATURDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2007 AMES, IOWA

EXAMPLE Point A: Sandy Loam: 65% Sand _ 20% Silt _ 15% Clay. Point B: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point C: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point D: %Sand % Silt % Clay

Impact of agricultural soil conditions on floods - Autumn R&D Technical Report W5B-026/TR

SOIL SURVEY FOR PROPOSED WET ASH DISPOSAL FACILITY, HENDRINA POWER STATION, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE

LANDPKS TEACHING MANUAL

Team number Page 1 of Canon Envirothon Soils Station Test. Soils and Climate Change

CB1 Moderately undulating landscape with slight gilgai (few inches) formation: broad ridge tops and upper slopes of moderately shallow grey cracking

2012 FINAL SOILS AREA 2 Envirothon Questions Answer KEY

Soil characteristics that influence nitrogen and water management

The issue of Protection of class I and class II soils in the One Plan

Area 3 Envirothon Soils Questions Key

1. Position (2 pts.) 2. Parent Material (2 pts.) 3. Slope Characteristics (2 pts.) 4. Surface Stoniness or Rockiness (2 pts.)

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION REPORT

EXPERIMENT 6 PREPARATION OF LAND CAPABILITY CLASS MAP

Key factors for movement of water in the flood plain

Investigation into soil texture in my area

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching

Tools to facilitate the use of Soil Maps in Emilia-Romagna region (Italy) Paola Tarocco

EDULABZ. Ans. (b) 7. The soft, porous layer with a good water-retaining capacity forms the

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 76. Mossburn

Soil resources in upper Basho Valley.

Effects of the Bupa retirement complex on the soil resources at 25 & 35 Ulyatt Road, Napier

Girtridge Monitor Farm Meeting

York Potash Project Mine, MTS and MHF Environmental Statement, Part 2 Chapter: 16 Land Use and Soils Appendix 16.5 Outline Soil Management Plan

Horner-McLaughlin Woods: Soil Types

Soil ph and Lime Requirement

ALBERTA TRANSPORTATION POST-DISTURBANCE ASSESSMENT GUIDE FOR BORROW EXCAVATIONS. Dec 2013 Edition

Transcription:

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION LEEDS AND LANGLEY BY-PASS, KENT

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION LEEDS AND LANGLEY BY-PASS, KENT 1 BACKGROUND 1 1 In connection with proposals for the Leeds and Langley By-Pass in Kent a detailed Agricultural Land Classification survey of two alternative routes was undertaken between June and September 1990 The villages of Leeds and Langley are situated on the B2163 just to the south-east of Maidstone in Kent The proposed blue route passes to the east of Leeds and Langley and extends from Rectory Farm on the A274 in the south across approximately 4 5 km to the junction of the B2163 and the A20 m the north Alternatively the proposed red route, which also begins at Rectory Farm on the A274 in the south passes to the west of Leeds and Langley extending across 4 1 km, to the junction of the A2020 and the A20 m the north 1 2 The alternative routes were surveyed using 110 cm and 120 cm Dutch soil augers with samples being taken at approximate 100 m intervals along the lengths A number of soil pits were inspected to enable more detailed soil description Land-use 1 3 At the time of survey land-use along the 'blue' route comprised a mix of arable cropping (wheat barley and oilseed rape) and grassland being grazed by sheep A small area of orchard was also present The land-use along the red route was considerably more varied with a mix of arable cropping, (principally wheat and barley) horticulture, (vegetables soft fruit and orchards) grassland supporting sheep and cattle with some under-used land - 1 -

PHYSICAL FACTORS AFFECTING LAND OUALITY Relief 2 \ Along the 'blue' route, relief varies considerably At the southern end the land lies at approximately 105 m A 0 D It rises gently towards the north-east reaching a maximum of 120 m A O D at Burberry Lane As the proposed route passes northwards from here the land falls steadily beyond Leeds village towards the A20 Just north of Ashbank the land falls steeply into a small wooded valley Gradients here act as a local limitation to agricultural land quality A minimum altitude of 50 m A 0 D occurs at the far northern end of the 'blue' route at its junction with the A20 Along the 'red route the land falls slightly from 105 m A 0 D at the southern end towards 95 m A 0 D at Langley Corner Farm It then rises very slightly northwards reaching a plateau of 100-105 maod To the immediate west of Leeds village the land begins to fall towards a lake-filled valley Around Brogden very localised steep slopes impose a limitation on agricultural land quality Beyond the lake, the land begins to rise once more, reaching 60 m A 0 D at the junction of the proposed route, the A2020 and the A20 Climate 2 2 Estimates of climatic variables, (adjusted for altitude), were obtained by interpolation from a 5 km grid database, (Met Office 1989) for a representative location m the survey area Climatic variables Grid Reference TQ 824 541 TQ 825 520 Altitude (maod) 45 120 Accumulated temperature [ days Jan-June) 1455 1370 Average annual rainfall (mm) 696 730 Field capacity days 145 150 Moisture deficit wheat (mm) 116 106 Moisture deficit, potatoes (mm) 109 99-2 -

2 3 The important parameters in assessing an overall climatic limitation are accumulated temperature, which provides an indication of the warmth of a locality, and average annual rainfall which provides a measure of the degree of wetness of a locality The values for accumulated temperature and average annual rainfall indicate that the survey area is relatively warm and dry, both m regional and national terms There is no overall climatic limitation to the agricultural land quality at this locality Climatic factors do however influence interactive limitations between soil and climate specifically soil wetness and droughtiness Geology and Soils 2 4 British Geological Survey, Sheet 288, Maidstone, (1976), indicates that both route options pass across Cretaceous Lower Greensand deposits with smaller areas of Pleistocene and Recent drift deposits The proposed blue' route comprises Head deposits across much of the southern half with Hythe Beds (sandy limestone and calcareous sands) comprising most of the northern half Small outcrops of Atherfield Clay and Folkestone Beds also occur across the northern part of the route The proposed red route almost entirely comprises Hythe Beds with smaller outcrops of Atherfield Clay and Folkestone Beds occurring towards the north 2 5 Soil Survey of England and Wales Sheet 6 (1983) Soils of South-East England, indicates the presence of a number of soil associations m this locality The Mailing association is mapped across most of the proposed red route and the north of the 'blue' route These soils are described as, 'fine loamy typical argillic brown earths over sandy limestone (ragstone) at depths below 80 cm, (SSEW, 1984) Across the southern part of the 'blue route the Marlow association has been mapped These soils are described as typical paleo-argillic brown earths with - 3 -

flinty fine loamy upper horizons over well structured yellowish red clay ' {SSEW 1984) Towards the far north of both route options and occurring m association with Folkestone Beds soils of the Fyfield 2 association occur These are, 'loamy almost sandy typical argillic brown earths passing to sand or sandstone', (SSEW 1984) 2 6 Detailed field examination indicates the presence of a number of soil groups across the area surveyed 2 7 Much of the land surveyed comprises soils which have developed m association with Hythe Bed deposits, although there are several variants within this broad group - Across the lower slopes profiles comprise medium textured topsoiis and upper subsoils (le medium clay loam or silty clay loam) which rest over heavier lower subsoils of day or silty clay Although imperfectly drained as evidenced by gleying immediately above or within these clay horizons profiles are generally not slowly permeable and are thus assigned to wetness class I or II Occasional profiles become impenetrable, (to soil auger) over sandy ragstone at depths greater than about 80 cm - Soils across the upper slopes particularly along the blue route are typically much more brashy (due to sandy ragstone fragments), and shallow over the Hythe Beds Medium textured topsoiis, (le, medium clay loam and silty clay loam) typically contain between 10 and 15% v/v sandy ragstone fragments >2 cm and become progressively more brashy with depth resting over impenetrable (to soil auger), ragstone at depths of about 50-100 cm - The final variant occurs more locally and is characterised by deep well drained medium textured soils Medium clay loam and silty clay loam topsoiis overlie similar textures to depth Profiles occasionally become brashy due to 10-20-a v/v sandy ragstone fragments at depths greater than 80 cm 2 8 Across the northern part of the blue route especially around and to the north of Ashbank soils are extremely stony Profiles typically - 4 -

comprise moderately stony (le 18-20% v/v medium angular flints >2 cm), medium clay loam or (fine) sandy clay loam topsoils which pass to very stony subsoils of similar texture Stone contents of 25-50-s v/v flints are common within 50 cm of the surface becoming 70-80% v/v flints below 50 cm 2 9 At the northern end of the red' route soils have developed m sandy Folkestone Beds Profiles typically comprise sandy silt loam or sandy loam topsoiis overlying similar textures or sandy clay loam in the subsoil Profiles are slightly stony throughout having between 2 and 5% v/v flints and are well drained being assigned to wetness class I accordingly 3 AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION 3 1 The ALC grading of the two alternative route options is primarily determined by interactions between soil and climatic factors, namely wetness and droughtiness Locally other factors such as topsoii stoniness and gradient affect the land quality ALC grades 1 2, 3a and 3b have been mapped and the breakdown in terms of length of route and extent is given below BLUE ROUTE Grade 1 2 3a 3b Length (m) 230 520 920 970 % of Total Length Surveved 8 23 34 35 Total length of agricultural land surveyed 2740 Woodland ) Not surveyed ) 1740 Non-agricultural land) 100 Total length of route 4480-5 -

RED ROUTE Grade 1 2 3a 3b Length (m) 600 1650 1270 300 % of Total Length Surveved 16 43 33 8 Total length of agricultural land surveyed Not surveyed ) Non-agricultural land) 3820 280 100 Total length of route 4100 ALTERNATIVE RED ROUTE Grade 2 3a A274 JUNCTION Length (m) 350 290 % of Total Length Surveved 55 45 Total length of agricultural land surveyed 640 100 Total length of route 640 3 2 Appendix 1 provides a generalised description of the grades and subgrades identified in this survey 3 3 BLUE ROUTE The overall land quality along the 'blue route is lower relative to that found along the 'red route with grades 1 and 2 representing 8% and 23% respectively of the total agricultural length surveyed In addition the implications for agricultural land-take should this option be chosen would be slightly less detrimental to the national agricultural interest given that a considerable length of the proposed route IS given over to non-agricultural uses, woodland being most - 6 -

significant A small proportion of the proposed blue route was not surveyed at the request of the landowner 3 4 RED ROUTE Generally the agricultural land quality along the proposed 'red' route is higher than that along the proposed blue route with grades 1 and 2 representing 16 and 43% respectively of the total agricultural length surveyed It is also important to note that only a very small proportion of the length surveyed is m non-agricultural use 3 5 The following paragraphs describe and explain the ALC grading along both routes surveyed Since the soil types observed along both proposed routes are broadly similar, as described in sections 2 7 to 2 9 it is not necessary to describe the land quality of the routes separately it is appropriate to deal with both proposed routes as one 3 6 Grade 1 Land of this quality occurs along both route options but not extensively Profiles are generally deep and well drained, occasionally resting over brashy sandy ragstone below about 1 m Medium textured topsoils and upper subsoils typically pass to slightly heavier textures m the lower subsoil which may be gleyed below about 45-50 cm, but is not slowly permeable, thereby qualifying for wetness class I proflles may be slightly stony, containing brashy ragstone fragments throughout Land of this quality has no or very minor limitations to agricultural use and is capable of supporting a wide range of agricultural and horticultural crops whose yields are high and relatively consistent 3 7 Grade 2 Land of this quality was mapped along both survey routes although it occurs most extensively along the proposed red' route Profiles are limited by a number of factors acting singly or in combination namely - 7 -

slightly imperfect drainage, slight droughtiness and topsoii stone contents in the range 5-10% v/v >2cm Those profiles which are limited by wetness show evidence of imperfect drainage in the form of gleying from about 28 to 50 cm depth Medium textured topsoiis typically pass to heavier textures in the upper and lower subsoil but these are not slowly permeable despite being gleyed Wetness class II is assigned to these profiles A number of profiles are prone to slight droughtiness as a result of soil textures and/or soil depth over sandy ragstone Profiles containing subsoil horizons of clay or sandy textures may be slightly droughty as a result of the reduced available water reserves which these textures hold Similarly profiles which rest over sandy ragstone between 80 and 100 cm have reduced available water for plant growth, as do deep soils which are slightly to moderately stony, (sandy ragstone fragments) throughout Occasional profiles have between 5% and 10% v/v sandy ragstone fragments >2cm in the topsoii The associated increase in production costs through implement wear, reduction m crop quality and establishment cause these profiles to be slightly downgraded Grade 2 has minor limitations which affect crop yield, cultivations or harvesting but overall this very good quality agricultural land can support a wide range of crops 3 8 Grade 3a Land of this quality is associated with soil profiles which are moderately stony in the topsoii and throughout and/or rest over sandy ragstone at relatively shallow depth The principal limitations to the agricultural use of this land are thus, droughtiness and/or topsoii stoniness Profiles are generally medium textured throughout but may contain up to 20% v/v sandy ragstone fragments and/or rest over brashy sandy ragstone - 8 -

from about 55 cm Relatively shallow depths combined with slight to moderate stoniness throughout results in restricted water available for plant growth and a consecjuent moderate drought risk Topsoii stone contents of 10-15% v/v sandy ragstone fragments >2 cm act to impose a limitation to agricultural use through increased costs reduced crop quality and reduced level and consistency of yields 3 9 Grade 3b Land has been graded 3b across parts of both proposed routes The limitations acting to cause land to be assigned to this grade are similar to those described in previous sections le wetness droughtiness and topsoii stone contents, but are more severe they may act singly or m combination in addition, a small area on both routes has been graded 3b on the basis of localised steep gradients Many of the profiles assigned to this grade are principally limited by droughtiness resulting from relatively shallow depth over brashy sandy ragstone Profiles are medium textured and pass through a very stony subsoil typically containing 30-50% v/v sandy ragstone to become impenetrable (to soil auger) between 35 and 50 cm Soil moisture reserves are limited by this shallow depth thereby acting to impose a moderate to severe drought risk The land adjacent to, and north of Ashbank on the proposed 'blue route IS also extremely stony but profiles contain flints rather than sandy ragstone fragments these probably arising from the deposition of a drift deposit over the area These profiles have been assigned to grade 3b on the basis of droughtiness and/or topsoii stone contents between about 15 and 20% v/v Localised areas with steep gradients as measured by an optical reading clinometer, have been assigned to grade 3b Gradients of 8-10 were recorded These would severely limit the possibility and safety of - 9 -

I mechanised farm operations which could be carried out Overall, land of this quality is able to support a narrow range of moderately yielding crops, principally cereals and grass Ref 2007/012/90 MICHELLE LEEK Resource Planning Group Reading R 0-10 -

SOtJRCES OF REFERENCE - BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY (1976) Sheet 288, Maidstone - MAFF (1988) Agricultural Land Classification Revised guidelines and criteria for grading the quality of agricultural land - METEOROLOGICAL OFFICE (1989) Climatological datasets for agricultural land classification - SOIL SURVEY OF ENGLAND AND WALES (1983) Sheet 6 Soils of South-East England - SOIL SURVEY OF ENGLAND AND WALES (1984) Bulletin 15 - Soils and their use m South-East England - 11 -

APPENDIX 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE GRADES AND SUBGRADES The ALC ^ades and subgrades are described below m terms ofthe types of limitation which can occur typical cropping range and the expected level and consistency of yield In practice the grades are defined by reference to physical characteristics and the grading guidance and cut offs for limitation factors m Section 3 enable land to be ranked m accordance with these general descnptions The most productive and flexible land falls into Grades 1 and 2 and Subgrade 3a and collectively comprises about one third ofthe agricultural land in England and Wales About half the land is of moderate quality in Subgrade 3b or poor quality in Grade 4 Although less significant on a national scale such land can be locally valuable to agriculture and the rural economy where poorer farmland predominates The remainder is very poor quality land in Grade 5 which mostly occurs in the uplands Descriptions are also given of other land categories which may be used on ALC maps Grade 1 - exceuent quality agricultural land Land with no or very minor limitations to agricultural use A very wide range of agricultural and horticultural crops can be grown and commonly includes top fruit soft fruit salad crops and winter harvested vegetables Yields are high and less variable than on land of lower quality Grade 2 very good quality agricultural land Land with minor limitations which affect crop yield, cultivations or harvesting A wide range of agricultural and horticultural crops can usually be grown but on some land in the grade there may be reduced flexibility due to difficulties with the production of the more demanding crops such as winter harvested vegetables and arable root crops The level of yield is generally high but may be lower or more variable than Grade 1 Grade 3 - good to moderate quahty agricultural land Land with moderate limitations which affect the choice of crops timing and type of cultivation harvesting or the level of yield Where more demanding crops are grown yields are generally lower or more variable than on land in Grades 1 and 2 Subgrade 3a good quality agricultural land Land capable of consistently producing moderate to high yields of a narrow range of arable crops especially cereals or moderate yields ofa wide range of crops includmg cereals grass oilseed rape, potatoes sugar beet and the less demanding horticultural crops Subgrade 3b - moderate quabty agricultural land Land capable of producing moderate yields of a narrow range of crops principally cereals and grass or lower yields of a wider range of crops or high yields ofgrass which can be grazed or harvested over most ofthe year

Grade 4 - poor quality agricultural land Land with severe limitations which significantly restrict the range of crops and/or level of yields It is mainly suited to grass with occasional arable crops (eg cereals and forage crops) the yields ofwhich are variable In moist chmates yields ofgrass may be moderate to high but there may be difficulties m utilisation The grade also includes very droughty arable land Grade 5 - very poor quality agricultural land Land with very severe limitations which restrict use to permanent pasture or rough grazing except for occasional pioneer forage crops Descriptions of other land categories used on ALC maps Urban Built up or hard uses with relatively little potential for a return to agriculture including housing industry commerce education transport religious buildings cemeteries Also hard surfaced sports facilities permanent caravan sites and vacant land all types of derehct land including mineral workings which are only likely to be reclaimed using derelict land grants Non agricultural Soft uses where most ofthe land could be returned relatively easily to agriculture mcluding golf courses pnvate parkland public open spaces sports fields allotments and soft surfaced areas on airports/airfields Also active mmeral workings and refuse tips where restoration conditions to soft after uses may apply Woodland Includes commercial and non commercial woodland A distinction may be made as necessary between farm and non farm woodland Agricultural buildings Includes the normal range of agricultural buildings as well as other relatively permanent structures such as glasshouses Temporary structures (eg polythene tunnels erected for lambing) may be ignored Open water Includes lakes ponds and rivers as map scale permits Land not surveyed Agricultural land which has not been surveyed Where the land use mcludes more than one ofthe above land cover types eg buildings in large grounds and where map scale permits the cover types may be shown separately Otherwise the most extensive cover type will usually be shown

FIELD ASSESSMENT OF SOIL WETNESS CLASS SOIL WETNESS CLASSIFICATION Soil wetness is classified according to the depth and duration of waterlogging in the soil profile Six revised soil wetness classes (Hodgson in preparation) are identified and are defined m Table 11 Table 11 Definition of Soil Wetness Classes Wetness Class Duration of Waterloggingi I The soil profile is not wet withm 70 cm depth for more than 30 days in most years2 II III IV V VI The soil profile is wet within 70 cm depth for 31 90 days in most years or if there is no slowly permeable layer within 80 cm depth it IS wet withm 70 cm for more than 90 days but not wet within 40 cm depth for more than 30 days m most years The soil profile is wet within 70 cm depth for 91 180 days in most years or if there is no slowly permeable layer withm 80 cm depth it IS wet withm 70 cm for more than 180 days but only wet within 40 cm depth for between 31 and 90 days in most years The soil profile is wet within 70 cm depth for more than 180 days but not within 40 cm depth for more than 210 days in most years or if there is no slowly permeable layer withm 80 cm depth it is wet within 40 cm depth for 91 210 days in most years The soil profile is wet withm 40 cm depth for 211 335 days in most years The soil profile is wet within 40 cm depth for more than 335 days m most years 1 The number of days specified is not necessarily a continuous period 2 In most years is defined as more than 10 out of 20 years Soils can be allocated to a wetness class on the basis of quantitative data recorded over a period of many years or by the interpretation of soil proflle characteristics site and climatic factors Adequate quantitative data will rarely be available for ALC surveys and therefore the interpretative method of field assessment is used to identify soil wetness class in the field The method adopted here is common to ADAS and the SSLRC