MINNESOTA HISTORIC PROPERTY RECORD PART I. PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION AND GENERAL INFORMATION

Similar documents
National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet

MINNESOTA HISTORIC PROPERTY RECORD PART I. PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION AND GENERAL INFORMATION

MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURE - HISTORY INVENTORY FORM

MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURE - HISTORY INVENTORY FORM

MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURE - HISTORY INVENTORY FORM

MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURE - HISTORY INVENTORY FORM

National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet

National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet

North River Mills Bridge Hampshire County State Project # S314-45/ Federal Project # ARRA-4520(003)D FR#: HM-1

Eligible, see Statement of Significance. Roadside Development on Minnesota Trunk Highways,

MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURE - HISTORY INVENTORY FORM

MINNESOTA HISTORIC PROPERTY RECORD PART I. PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION AND GENERAL INFORMATION

Fall 2017 Construction Update

MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURE - HISTORY INVENTORY FORM

Existing Transportation System 5-1

MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURE - HISTORY INVENTORY FORM

Minneapolis South Z15 E N Not Eligible, see Statement of Significance Also member of eligible NR district: Lilac Way Historic District

Photo Album Intact/Slightly Altered. Eligible, see Statement of Significance. Roadside Development on Minnesota Trunk Highways,

MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURE - HISTORY INVENTORY FORM

CTH C RESURFACING Douglas County, Wisconsin

Mississippi Skyway Preliminary Engineering Report

Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet. Related District Number.

Hunterdon County s Stone Arch Bridges

TH 169/1 1B 265 City/Township. Soudan, City of St. Louis Acres 3.5. Soudan Z15 E N Not Eligible, see Statement of Significance

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 TH 14 WEST STUDY AREA Project Description Functional Classification Purpose of the Project

HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT: Planning and Programming Division: An Inventory of Its Transportation Planning Studies

IMPORTANT NOTICE. Architectural Inventory Form COLORADO CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY I. IDENTIFICATION th Street 5WL.5601

COMMUNICATION URBAN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CITY OF DES MOINES, IOWA MAY 16, 2017 MEETING

WELCOME TO PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE #2. Please Sign In

Derby-Shelton Bridge Pedestrian and Bicyclist Enhancements [1]

DRAFT SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION LIFT BRIDGE

Connecting the DOTs: Nationwide Trends in the Inventory, Evaluation, and Management of Historic Roads

Spring 2018 Construction Update

FINAL MITIGATION PLAN to address

Victoria Street Pedestrian Bridge

Phase I Results. Minnesota Local Historic Bridge Study. Minnesota Department of Transportation. Bridge 448 in Olmsted County. Report prepared for

WELCOME TO THE PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE. Please Sign In

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code 3S, 3CS, 5S3 Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation December 13, 2007 COASTAL TRAIL AT LAND S END. File No Project Manager: Joan Cardellino

Parapet/Formliner/Fencing

Information for File # ARC

Page. I. Introduction 1. II. Project Purpose and Need 2. IV. Description of Section 4(f) Property 2. V. Impacts to Section 4(f) property 3

HAZARD MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

CHAPTER 3 DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT CHARACTER AREA

4-Town Comprehensive Plan DRAFT 7/30/07

National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

THE STILLWATER BRIDGE STORY

Transportation Committee

I-90 Mississippi River Bridge & Interchange Project

Prospect Community Plan Update Public Meeting November 2, 2017 OVERVIEW PROSPECT BEAUTIFICATION/CONNECTIVITY PLAN

Middlebury RS 0174(8)

Visitor's Guide to Historic Bridge Park

TH 61 6A 64.6 City/Township. Wabasha North Z15 E N Intact/Slightly Altered. Eligible, see Statement of Significance

TH 23 1A City/Township. Esko Z15 E N "or SP 5303" Designer Nichols, A R, Attributed. Ols 1.14a Very Altered

From local initiatives to some of the largest and most complex projects, KOA leads the field in:

Downtown Redevelopment Project Update

50TH AND FRANCE DISTRICT STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS

Photo Album Intact/Slightly Altered. Eligible, see Statement of Significance Also member of eligible NR district: Lilac Way Historic District

Corridor Management Committee. September 29, 2017

Overall Map. Chicago. St. Louis. Summit. Joliet. Dwight. Pontiac. Bloomington-Normal Lincoln. Springfield. Carlinville. Alton EXPERIENCE IT YOURSELF.

PROJECT STATEMENT LOCATION/DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING. 19 th AVENUE NORTH EXTENSION PROJECT FROM SPRINGDALE DRIVE TO NORTH 2 ND STREET/U.S.

Clay Street Bridge Replacement Project

Great Lakes North Central South Central FAX: (718) CONTACT PERSON: ADDRESS: Daniel Hom, PE, Engineer-in-Charge

Albert Lea. Redevelopment Plan. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN Tel: (763) Fax: (763) wsbeng.

MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURE - HISTORY INVENTORY FORM

Issues Requiring Future Study

American Railway Development Association

Bushaway Railroad Bridge, 1915 Horse & buggy entering Bushaway, Sept. 10, 2008 Presentation to Task Force for Reconstruction of Hwy 101

Green Oak Charter Township. Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes August 4, 2016

Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan

TH 59 8B 34.5 City/Township. Avoca Z15 E N Eligible, see Statement of Significance

2.0 AREA PLANS. Lakeside Business District. Lakeside Business District Land Use Categories:

The GATEWAYS Sub Area Master Plan. City of Walker

DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK POST 2030 LAND USE PLAN INTRODUCTION

Page. I. Introduction 1. II. Project Purpose and Need 1. IV. Description of Section 4(f) Property 2. V. Impacts to Section 4(f) Property 3

North Carolina Department of Transportation Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch

1.0 Circulation Element

Welcome to the Sellwood Bridge Project Pre-Construction Open House

Transportation Systems and Utility Infrastructure

Town of Portola Valley General Plan. Nathhorst Triangle Area Plan

2. Badgers Island and Mainland Construction

2017 Canadian Consulting Engineering Awards

Elgin O Hare Western Access Project Local Advisory Committee. February 10, 2014

Historic Bridge Adoption Information Packet

I-70 Corridor Enhancement Plan

APPENDIX F. Historic Assessment of A Street Bridge

The Village of Sugar Grove, in partnership with Kane County, the Illinois Department of Transportation, and the Illinois Tollway welcomes you to the

DOMINION BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN A MODEL FOR CHESAPEAKE S FUTURE

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

HISTORIC BRIDGE FOR SALE COLUMBIA BRIDGE IN JACKSON PARK, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS

E x E C U T I v E S U M M A R y / P L A N N I N G C O N T E x T 14 //

PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE VROOMAN ROAD BRIDGE and ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF RATHBURN ROAD, FROM DUKE OF YORK BOULEVARD TO SHIPP DRIVE, CITY OF MISSISSAUGA. Submitted to:

HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT SALEM BRIDGE, COUNTY SITE No. B IRVINE CREEK (LOTS 15 & 16, CONCESSION 11 GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF NICHOL)

1. Name of Property. historic name Lowe Building. other names/site number Iowa State Extension Office (current) 2. Location

West Dennis Center: Bass River to Old Main Street. West Dennis Business District: Old Main Street to Dennis Commons

Bassett Creek Valley Working Group. October 4, 2017

MODEL ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN MINNESOTA TRUNK HIGHWAY 7 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (HUTCHINSON SEGMENT)

V. Gateways GATEWAYS / V-1

Appendix E Preliminary Location Hydraulic Study

Transcription:

MINNESOTA HISTORIC PROPERTY RECORD PART I. PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION AND GENERAL INFORMATION Common Name: 3589 Bridge Number: 3589 Identification Number: Location: Feature Carried: TH 61 Feature Crossed: Stewart River Descriptive Location: 2.2 Miles Northeast of Jct. CSAH 2 Town, Range, Section: 53N-10W-15 Town or City: Silver Creek Township County: Lake UTM: Zone: Easting: Northing: 15 604010 5211390 Quad: Two Harbors 7.5 Minute Series 1927 Present Owner: State Present Use: Mainline Significance Statement: Overlooking Lake Superior on the east, Bridge No. 3589 carries Minnesota Trunk Highway 61 (formerly Trunk Highway 1) over the Stewart River in a rural area just north of Two Harbors. In 1924, the Minnesota Highway Department erected at this site a 70-foot, spandrel-filled, reinforcedconcrete arch detailed in the Classical Revival Style. On each side, monumental pilasters, decorated with a recessed, rectilinear panel, framed the arch opening, which was further ornamented by a pronounced archivolt. To set off the architectural detailing, the concrete work displayed two types of finish: coarse on the abutment walls, pilaster panels, and spandrel walls; smooth on the pilaster surrounds and archivolt. The bridge's concrete railings, also smoothly finished, were of the open-balustrade type, except for solid-parapet sections over the abutment walls. These sections displayed recessed panels accented with a coarse finish. The original roadway width was 19 feet. In 1939, the Minnesota Highway Department widened the arch by pouring a new section on the east side, so that the bridge could accommodate a 30-foot roadway and a single sidewalk, located on the east. In its architectural detailing and finish, the new east side reiterated the original construction of the abutment walls, pilasters, spandrel walls, and Page 1 of 6

archivolt. As part of the remodeling, the state also replaced the original railings on both sides. The new concrete railings eliminated the solid-parapet sections over the abutment walls in favor of an extended, open-balustrade treatment for the entire crossing. Although plainer in detailing, the new railings were compatible with the bridge's Classical Revival Style. Bridge No. 3589 retains its historical integrity. In 1921, Minnesota inaugurated a state trunk highway system that was intended to connect all county seats with a state-owned network of well-engineered and well-maintained arterial roads. One of the longest routes, and the most heavily traveled during the system's first decade, was Trunk Highway No. 1 (later redesignated as Trunk Highway 61). Stretching from Iowa to Canada, by way of Albert Lea, Minneapolis, Duluth, Two Harbors, and Grand Portage, Trunk Highway 1 was a crucial conduit for the state's economic life, equally serving southern Minnesota farmers, Twin Cities manufacturers, and Lake Superior resort owners. For Midwestern motorists, the route was most famous for its northern reaches, which skirted the edge of Lake Superior on a rocky ledge cut by cascading streams. To quote one of the many travel writers who extolled the highway in the 1920s: "Beyond argument, the drive on this northern shore of Lake Superior between Duluth and Port Arthur [Canada] is a natural classic. This is the land of the sky-blue water and the cathedral red rocks, where the prophetic Indian voice of Gitchie Manitou booms to the joyous loneliness amid the million sea gulls flying like snow. A most satisfying road clings to the shore, now streaming with light, now cut through somber jungle of blue-black trees." By 1931, Trunk Highway 1 boasted 300 miles of continuous pavement from Albert Lea to Two harbors, providing the smoothest, longest ride in the state system. This achievement cost considerable exertion on the part of the Minnesota Highway Department, especially on the lakeshore portion of the route where existing roadways and bridges required widening or replacement to conform to the department's safety standards. With its rock-rimmed river gorges, the area was one of the few regions in the state that favored concrete-arch bridges, which reduced substructure costs by springing directly from exposed bedrock. In 1924, the state highway department prepared a concrete-arch design, with a 70-foot span and a 19-foot roadway, to replace an older crossing of the Stewart River in a rural area just north of Two Harbors. On a bid of $9,285, Adams Construction Company of Minneapolis secured the contract for the project, and a photograph of the new crossing appeared in the state highway department's biennial report for 1923-24. The agency's pride in Bridge No. 3589 was understandable, as its sedate Classical Revival design was the most aesthetically accomplished statement yet produced by the state trunk highway program. As a general rule, the highway department reserved architectural detailing for urban bridges areas, and then focused the treatment on railing design. Bridges in rural areas were considered utilitarian engineering structures. As a spokesman for the highway department later explained: "The engineer in general and the bridge engineer in particular have been very frequently criticized for the lack of beauty or aesthetics in their structural work. Nevertheless it is a debatable question as to what extent this practice of beautification should be carried in the case of the many so-called 'country' bridges. In public undertakings of this kind, the economical aspects usually tend to outweigh the item of aesthetics, and in numerous instances, quite properly so." Bridge No. 3589 was a stand-out exception, featuring not only well-detailed, open-balustrade railings, but also an emphatic archivolt and monumental pilasters with recessed panels accented by contrasting concrete finishes. Evidently, the bridge's scenic location on a popular tourist route made the Stewart River crossing a worthy candidate for full architectural treatment. The lake shore drive was so heavily traveled that in 1934 the highway department prepared a preliminary Page 2 of 6

plan for widening the bridge's roadway. Implementation of the project, however, was postponed until 1939, when federal funds finally became available for the purpose. Completed at a cost of $12,793 by contractor August Laine of Kettle River, Minnesota, the bridge's widening respected the structure's original design, so that Bridge No. 3589 remains a striking ornament of the state's trunk highway system. Bridge No. 3589 is eligible for the National Register under Criterion C for its architectural design, within the historic context of "Reinforced-Concrete Highway Bridges in Minnesota, 1900-1945." The Multiple Property Documentation Form associated with this context states that a concrete highway bridge may be eligible under Criterion C if it displays notable aesthetics. Bridge No. 3589 is also eligible under Criterion A in the area of transportation for its association with the state trunk highway system, within the historic context of "Northern Minnesota Resort Industry." Page 3 of 6

PART II. HISTORICAL INFORMATION Date of Construction: 1924 Contractor and/or Designer (if known): Contractor: Adams Construction Company, Minneapolis, Minnesota; August Laine, Kettle River, Minnesota Designer: Minnesota Highway Department Historic Context: Northern Minnesota Resort Industry Reinforced-Concrete Highway Bridges in Minnesota National Register Criterion: A, C Page 4 of 6

PART III. DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION Descriptive Information: single-span, reinforced-concrete arch concrete abutments earth fill on arch supports roadway with sidewalk on east open-baluster concrete railings Page 5 of 6

PART IV. SOURCES OF INFORMATION References: Historians: Minnesota Department of Transportation Bridge Database; Bridge No. 3589 File, in Minnesota Department of Transportation, Waters Edge Building, St. Paul; Bridge No. 3589 Storage File, in Minnesota Department of Transportation Records Center, St. Paul; Bridge No. 3589 File, in Minnesota Department of Transportation District Office 1, Duluth, Minnesota; "Odd Map Pictures Disbursements and Traffic Flow on Minnesota Highways," Western Magazine 27 (April 1926): 103; "The Rimland of Unsalted Seas," Western Magazine 31 (August 1928): 126-128; "Paving Is Now Complete on Nine Highways," Mantorville Express, 3 December 1931; Minnesota Highway Department, Biennial Report, 1923-1924, 31; M.J. Hoffman, "Minnesota Trunk Highway Bridge Construction," Bulletin of the Minnesota Federation of Architectural and Engineering Societies 26 (April 1931): 18; Robert M. Frame, "Reinforced-Concrete Highway Bridges in Minnesota," National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form, Sec. F, 8, in State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul; "Historic Context: Northern Minnesota Resort Industry," in Minnesota History in Sites and Structures: A comprehensive Preservation Planning Process. Historic Context Outlines: The Post-Contact Period Contexts (St. Paul: State Historic Preservation Office, Minnesota Historical Society, n.d), 19-21; field inspection by Jeffrey A. Hess, 27 October 1995. PART V. PROJECT INFORMATION Jeffrey A. Hess Form Preparer: Mead & Hunt, 2006 MHPR NO. Page 6 of 6