PI will be involved once the developer has evolved a concept plan; essentially, to accommodate them as a pre-app exercise.

Similar documents
SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

WHITELEY TOWN COUNCIL NORTH WHITELEY DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 2014

South of Eastern Strategic Direction Status Update

Urban Growth Boundaries

Ebbsfleet Development Corporation

INTRODUCTION NORTH HEYBRIDGE GARDEN SUBURB

RECOMMENDATION(S) OF THE CALGARY PLANNING COMMISSION

City of Calgary and MD of Foothills Intermunicipal Development Plan

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

LAND USE AMENDMENT DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE (WARD 7) MACLEOD TRAIL SE AND 5 AVENUE SE BYLAW 254D2017

PMP PRINTING SITE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT - PHASE 2

GOLD BAR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATIONS CENTRE PROJECT AND REZONING NOTIFICATION

MINUTES OF THE CALGARY PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THURSDAY, 2012 JULY 19, AT 1:00 P.M. ENGINEERING TRADITIONS COMMITTEE ROOM, CITY HALL.

Building great communities:

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15, 2016

Don Mills Crossing Study and Celestica Lands Development Application Community Meeting, Open House, and Breakout Discussions

Enclosures Appendix 1: Draft Golders Green Station Planning Brief. Summary

DESIGN REVIEW PANEL PROCEDURES AND PROTOCOL

Community Garden Licence

Appropriate Assessment in relation to County Donegal Draft Heritage Plan

NEWSLETTER 05 FEBRUARY 2016 A PROJECT UPDATE ON THE CANADA WATER MASTERPLAN AND DETAILS OF THE UPCOMING DRAFT MASTERPLAN EVENTS.

Urban Design Review Panel Terms of Reference

To subscribe, unsubscribe or comment, send an message to

Posted by Calgary Public Library on November 1, 2012

The Village of Sugar Grove, in partnership with Kane County, the Illinois Department of Transportation, and the Illinois Tollway welcomes you to the

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

DESIGN REVIEW PANEL TERMS OF REFERENCE AND PROTOCOL

PRIORITIES COMMITTEE MEETING

~!VAUGHAN NOV Z November 21, Mr. Denis Kelly, Regional Clerk The Regional Municipality of York Yonge Street Newmarket, ON L3Y 6Z1

CITY OF SOCORRO, TEXAS REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN SERVICES FOR PROPOSED MAURO ROSAS PARK

John M. Fleming Managing Director, Planning and City Planner. Old East Village Dundas Street Corridor Secondary Plan Draft Terms of Reference

SUBJECT: GO Station Mobility Hubs Preferred Concepts: Aldershot GO, Burlington GO and Appleby GO. Planning and Development Committee - Public Meeting

EAST VILLAGE STRATEGIC SITE NOVEMBER 2017

Proposed Variation to the Midleton Town Development Plan 2013

CITY OF MOUNT GAMBIER BUILDING FIRE SAFETY COMMITTEE

City of Toronto. Emery Village Transportation Master Plan

Your guide to the exhibition

POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT TUXEDO PARK (WARD 9) CENTRE STREET N AND 26 AVENUE NE BYLAWS 36P2017 AND 234D2017

Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo. Design Review Panel DRAFT REPORT

Applicant: GIUSEPPE AND PALMA LOCONTE ISLINGTON AVENUE, WOODBRIDGE

COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION Parks and Recreation Department. Chair and Members of the Community and Corporate Services Committee

CITY CLERK. Parkland Acquisition Strategic Directions Report (All Wards)

Scope of Work Urban Design Review Framework Monitoring Program Item #7.1

TOWN OF BRUDERHEIM Report to the capital region board

Our Site Plan and Block Plan Drawing Nos /101B and /102C have been amended to reflect the following revisions:

Published in March 2005 by the. Ministry for the Environment. PO Box , Wellington, New Zealand ISBN: X.

Perth and Kinross Council Development Management Committee 8 June Pre-Application Report by Development Quality Manager

Building Great Neighbourhoods. Strathcona

Draft Municipal District Local Area Plans. Map Browser. VOLUME THREE Map Browser th November 2016

Planning and Growth Management Committee. Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division. Pg12013 (File No NNY 34 OZ)

A Canadian Initiative to advance Conservation, Connections, Collaboration and Leadership for Parks and Protected Areas

CITY OF PORT ST LUCIE

1120 Haist Street - Pelham Arena Community Co-Design Recommendation Report Haist Street - Pelham Arena Community Co-Design Recommendation Report

Agincourt Mall Planning Framework Review Local Advisory Committee Meeting #1 Summary

STANDARDS RELATED MEETING REPORT

Planning Commission April 4, 2013 BOCC Workshop Page 1

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 7, 2016

Streets for People, Place-Making and Prosperity. #TOcompletestreets

Preliminary concept information. Green cities fund

PART 1. Background to the Study. Avenue Study. The Danforth

Minto In Kensington Open House. Thursday March 23, pm Hillhurst Sunnyside Community Association Ave NW

Statement of Community Involvement LAND OFF SOUTHDOWN ROAD HORNDEAN, HAMPSHIRE

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

ITS Concept Development Activity Descriptions

The second application granted full planning permission for the development of a new sports centre facility.

Planning and Building Department APPLICATION FOR CEMETERY EXPANSION BAYVIEW CEMETERY, 720, 726 AND 740 SPRING GARDENS ROAD

3rd Cycle 2012 Amendment Staff Report

BEDFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING REPORT

RFP REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, NH. DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES North Mill Pond Trail and Greenway

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2018 January 25. That Calgary Planning Commission recommend APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

Memo. Fire Department Members, Municipal Representatives, First Responders and Emergency Services Personnel

9 CITY OF VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO BOCA EAST INVESTMENTS LIMITED

BETTER URBAN PLANNING

Town of Newmarket 395 Mulock Drive P.O. Box 328, Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 4X7. Website: newmarket.ca Phone:

Local Growth Planning in North Central Green Line Communities

Request for Decision. Recommendation. Presented: Monday, Jul 07, Report Date Friday, Jun 20, Type: Public Hearings

Reserved Matters application for a site that straddles the boundary between CBC and BBC

RIAI URBAN DESIGN SEMINAR & WORKSHOP SERIES 2010

ROAD CLOSURE AND LAND USE AMENDMENT SILVER SPRINGS (WARD 1) NORTHEAST OF NOSEHILL DRIVE NW AND SILVER SPRINGS ROAD NW BYLAWS 2C2018 AND 29D2018

NEWSLETTER 08 JANUARY 2018 JOIN US TO FIND OUT ABOUT THE CANADA WATER MASTERPLAN, DETAILED FIRST PHASE & HOW TO GET INVOLVED

The Corporation of the TOWN OF MILTON

... on the draft Arden Vision & Framework

Allison, we own 11 acre parcel at Old Hwy 99 SW, Rochester parcel #

JASPER PLACE. Area Redevelopment Plan

2013 season ticket for CPD events

Cambridge. West Cambridge site. What is a Shared Facilities Hub? Welcome

Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building

STIKEMAN ELLIOTT. Stikeman Elliott LLP Barristers & Solicitors

Community Visioning Workshop Prep

SCARBOROUGH SUBWAY EXTENSION. Scarborough Subway Extension. Final Terms of Reference

Welcome to the Oakridge Centre Open House

STANLEY PARK REDEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE

FOUR MILE RUN VALLEY WORKING GROUP AND CHARGE

Perth and Kinross Council Development Management Committee 20 February 2013 Report of Handling by Development Quality Manager

Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building. SUBJECT: Draft Lakeview Local Area Plan (January 2014)

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 16, 2016

Bloor St. W. Rezoning - Preliminary Report

Draft Amendment Provides details regarding ROPA 47 s purpose and effect. Related Processes Highlights other ongoing processes of note in the area

Applicant: ALDO AND DOMENICA PERRONE 142 HEDGEROW LANE, KLEINBURG. David Brown Associates

Transcription:

Franklin, Yvonne From: Sasges, Mark Sent: 2011 February 17 11:44 AM To: Vargas, Liliana I. Cc: Tebbutt, Fiona; Hall, Jules; Vanderputten, Ryan; Mulligan, Don; Lupton, Judy; Green, Brian M.; Mahler, Thorn Subject: RE: Stadium Shopping Centre At a previous mtg with the developers, hosted by LUPP, we advised that PI would not attend the preliminary sessions with the community, as this is engagement that they need to undertake with the community stakeholders. They do not have a development scheme to show us or the community as yet. PI will be involved once the developer has evolved a concept plan; essentially, to accommodate them as a pre-app exercise. As we understand it, they are currently working with LUPP in a policy exercise, related to the Shaganappi Reg Context Study DRAFT. From: Vargas, Liliana I. Sent: 2011 February 17 11:29 AM To: Sasges, Mark Cc: Tebbutt, Fiona; Hall, Jules; Vanderputten, Ryan; Mulligan, Don; Lupton, Judy Subject: Stadium Shopping Centre As per the email below, there was a session with the community last night. Despite all the areas (planning, parks, etc.. that will have to be involved in this file, I was the only attendee from the City. It would be highly appreciated that communications regarding the need/duty for attending such sessions be sent to all the internal stakeholders to show consistency. Tx Liliana Hi Mark, Fiona, Brian and Thorn, As discussed, we have now sent a formal invitation to the UHCA, SSADAC, Alberta Health and the University for the first workshop. I know some of us have a few additional meetings to have in the meantime, but I also wanted to send you the invitation so that we can ensure that we have as many key people at the table as possible. The first workshop will be held starting at 7pm on Wednesday February 16 th, 2011 in the library of the University School. The address is: University School 3035 Utah Drive NW Calgary, AB City of Calgary FOIP 00218 "DA- 00674

The purpose of this workshop is to: Outline the approach and process for preparing the master plan; Discuss the aspirations of all stakeholders for the shopping centre; Present a context and site analysis; Discuss the principles of sustainable communities and how they can be applied to redeveloping Stadium Shopping Centre The design team will not be presenting development proposals at this meeting- Following the workshop, we will develop concepts incorporating the input obtained at the workshop. The concepts will then be discussed with stakeholders at an additional workshop. We hope that you can join us on February 16 th Please RSVP (including the names of the individuals who will be attending) via email (mikeb@westsec.ca) or telephone at 403.781.8109. Again, please note that this is event is for invited stakeholders only and not open to the public. Thanks again, and please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Regards, Mike Brescia Ryan O'Connor Vice President, Commercial Assets Principal Western Securities Limited #900,600-6 Avenue SW Calgary, ABT2P0S5 Dir: 403.781.8109 Fax: 403.266.6157 Email: mikeb@westsec.ca Liliana Vargas, M.Eng., P.Eng. Senior Transportation Engineer, Transportation Development Services Transportation Planning The City of Calgary Mail Code: #8124 T 403.268.1648 C TBA F 403.268.1874 www.calgarv.ca Floor 7, Municipal Building - J6-9, 800 Macleod Trail S.E. P.O. Box 2100, Station M, Calgary, AB Canada T2P 2M5 My working hours are: Monday: 7:00-3:00 p.m., Tuesday and Thursday: 9:30-3:00 p.m., Wednesday: Telework. Friday 7=00-4:30 pm City of Calgary FOIP 00219 15rV- 00675

PE2011-00817 1914 1 lyhririclr Drivp NW - Stadium i ShnDDinQ Ofintre MfiPtind -.3 Nnvfimhfir 9011 Meetinq Notes Attendees Mark Sasqes - Planninq Implementation MS Fiona Tebbutt - Planning Implementation FT Jules Hall - Planning Implementation JH Tom Hopkins - Transportation TH Marty Richardson - Transportation MR Kerensa Fromherz - Transportation KF Dino Di Tosto - Urban Development DDT Keath Parker - Parks KP Sarah Hbeichi - Parks SH David Down - Urban Design DD Ryan O'Connor Western Securities RO'C Mike Brescia Western Securities MB Brian Horton Ziedler Partnership BH Bruce Nelligan DA Watt BN Nick Finn DA Watt NF Introduction Following introductions, JH outlined the purpose of a paid CPAG pre-application meeting was to identify potential key constraints to a future Development Permit application. In light of that, discussions would reflect the Pre-application Assessment Form that the City would issue once updated after the meeting. The assessment form identifies that information which would be required with the submission of a Development Permit application, together with an initial assessment of the proposed scheme. City of Calgary FOIP 00314 ^ / / 01066

Action: CPAG Team Planning JH identified the additional documents that would be required for the submission of a DP application. These include a Report on Consultation, Planning Supporting Statement, Mobility Assessment Plan and additional visual material, to assist the Development Authority in the consideration of the redevelopment of the site. Action: developer team BH indicated that the current situation with the re-development of the site is currently some way off the preparation and submission of a DP application. The intent of the meeting was to discuss the Masterplanning of the site, in concert with public and stakeholder consultation that is ongoing. A further stakeholder/community meeting is scheduled for 30 November 2011. Whilst a future DP application would include a phased approach to the development, a phasing plan has not currently been drafted. Action: developer team RO'C indicated that the developer team is looking to achieve approval of the Masterplan, through full Council, to be embedded into the recently approved non-statutory South Shagannapi Communities Area Plan (July 2011). Discussions have been held with Tom Mahler and Brian Green of the City's Land Use Planning and Policy department. JH would update LUPP on the outcome of the meeting. Action: JH In terms of the overall development of the site, the developer team is seeking on-going discussions with the City in the formulation of the Masterplan, to incorporate the various issues that arise through public consultation and discussions with the relevant City departments. MS indicated that the proposed redevelopment could be dealt with in a similar way to an Outline Plan application, to include any relevant land use amendment. The developer team is encouraged to have further discussions with the City's planning department to consider this further. Action: developer team. Planning Implementation Urban Development DDT indicated that the site would need to deal with fire access throughout the construction period. A principal issue with the redevelopment of the site is the DSSP. DDT stated that a full DSSP should be submitted with the site Masterplan. This would then be amended and updated, as necessary, during the course of considering Development Permit applications for the specific buildings/phases. This approach has been used for other large site DP applications. City of Calgary FOIP 00315 T>A- 01067

Action: developer team. DDT Urban Development recommends that a formal LOC for an outline plan be done before any formal Development Permit applications are submitted. This would allow for all transportation and access, land use and land dedication issues to be dealt with before the Development Permit stage. Transportation MR identified that one of the key issues with the redevelopment of the site is the interchange requirements for 16 Avenue and 29 Street NW. The developer team should indicate, through the Masterplan, how this issue will be resolved. Action: developer team. Transportation Transportation view the process in a similar way to how an Outline Plan proposal is considered, including any necessary land use amendments for the site and/or individual parcels within it. TH indicated that, upon the request of NF, the City's Transportation department would meet with DA Watt to discuss transportation and access issues in advance of the 30 November community/stakeholder meeting. That meeting will consider inter alia multi-modal transportation, site access and interchange requirements. Such discussions will likely involve significant analysis input. JH will arrange a meeting during the week commencing 21 November, to coincide with the community/stakeholder meeting. Action: developer team. Transportation. JH Parks KP identified the need for the Joint Use Coordinating Committee ("JUCC") to consider the exchange and redistribution of 'Community Reserve' to be incorporated into the redevelopment proposals. He indicated that Community Reserve was an older form of designation for Municipal Reserve and would confirm with the City's legal department whether it could be dealt with in the same way. KP advised that the most strategic approach would be to gain 'in principal' agreement from the JUCC that the exchange and redistribution acceptable. KP indicated that any exchange of Community Reserve would require provision, within the site, adjacent to public roads. This is a design issue that DD requested input on. The developer team will have further meetings with Parks to discuss this issue. Action: KP. JH. DD. riesvfilnpfir fpam Other matters JH indicated that the City would prepare the formal Pre-application Assessment Form and issue it to the developer team the week commencing 7 November 2011. City of Calgary FOIP 00316.,.- 01068 ^A

Action: JH The City has a Timeline Tool' that assists developers to indicate relevant timescales for the progression of the development process. JH will issue the Timeline Tool to the developer team, to be populated by them. After that, the City's planning department will meet with the developer to discuss the timescales and indicate where issues may arise. Action: JH A copy of the Pre-application Assessment Form and this meeting note will be circulated to all attendees, together with Tom Mahler and Brian Green of the City's LUPP department. Ar.tinnP.PAGtfiam..lH City of Calgary FOIP 00317 DA- 01069

Franklin, Yvonne From: Sent: To: Subject: Hall, Jules 2011 November 29 2:34 PM Tebbutt, Fiona FW: Stadium Workshop Fiona Details of the community meeting tomorrow night (see below). It starts at 18:30. Kind regards Jules Hall MA, DipTP, MRTPI Planner 2, Planning Implementation Development & Building Approvals The City of Calgary Mail code: #8073 T 403.268.2677 F 403.268.1528 calgarv.ca Main Floor, Administration Building -1319, 333 7th AV SE PO Box 2100, Station M, Calgary, AB Canada T2P 2M5 ISC: Protected From: Brian Horton [mailto:bhorton@zeidlerpartnership.com1 Sent: 2011 November 29 9:25 AM To: Hall, Jules Subject: Stadium Workshop Jules, Mike informed me that the City high-level process meeting was delayed. We look forward to discussing potential approaches once you have had this meeting. Below is the information for the workshop tomorrow night. We will be primarily discussing and obtaining stakeholder feedback on the principles outlined in the material submitted to the City. We have members of the surrounding communities, UofC and Alberta Health attending. Brian In continuing a collaborative approach to preparing a redevelopment plan for Stadium Shopping Centre we would like to invite the UHCA to participate in Stakeholder Workshop #2 on November 30th at 6:30 pm at the University Elementary School (3035 Utah Drive NW). The purpose of this workshop is to: * Update Stakeholders on the process and progress of the masterplan; * Review the outcomes of the first stakeholder workshop ; * Present the urban design and transportation principles along with the City's feedback; * Engage with Stakeholders in an open discussion regarding the principles and the City's comments; T)A-01059 City of Calgary FOIP 00312

* Discuss the next steps in the Masterplanning process. For this workshop, our intention is to invite members of the UHCA, two members from each of the surrounding communities, as well as representatives from the City, Alberta Health Services and the University of Calgary (the same process as the first workshop). Please note that this is event is for invited stakeholders only and not open to the public as we will be holding public open houses further on in the design process. Could you please confirm your attendance at this workshop and let us know if you have any questions, comments or concerns. Brian Horton, BA (Hons) MPLAN MCIP zeidler partnership architects T: 403.663.0125 200, 255 17th Avenue SW Calgary AB T2S 2T8 City of Calgary FOIP 00313 -j^a - 01060