Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 8. Sobig

Similar documents
Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 76. Mossburn

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No Waiau

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 11. Pukemutu

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 23. Waikiwi

DO YOU KNOW YOUR SOILS? (Rev. 10/11)

Mature basalt volcanic soils

2014 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam

The entire site supports grass on which sheep had been grazing recently.

2018 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam 1. Landscape positions characterizes the location of the soil on the landscape and identifies potential risks.

Soil Horizons cont. Oa- highly decomposed Oi-undecomposed

THE TENNESSEE VEGETABLE GARDEN

Examining soils in the field. Examining soils in the field. Environment Agency thinksoils examining soils in the field

2016 Iowa FFA Soils Evaluation CDE Exam

27/01/2017. This event is being run by SAC Consulting. What is Soil?

PROPOSED OPEN CAST COAL SITE SEPTEMBER 1992

Pits 1 & 3 Questions. 7. Subsurface: Texture (5 pts) A. Coarse B. Moderately course C. Medium D. Fine E. Very Fine

Soil Physical Properties

Soil Geography Notes JC-Learn. JC-Learn. Geography Notes Soil. 1 P a g e

Land Capability Classifications

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS BIRCH PIT, NEAR COLCHESTER ESSEX

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

Girtridge Monitor Farm Meeting

Iowa FFA Soil Career Development Event 2008

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION WITTON PARK, COUNTY DURHAM PROPOSED QUARRY EXTENSION DECEMBER 1992

3.44b. Soil Classification AK & BR

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS LAND NEAR SHIRE HILL FARM SAFFRON WALDEN ESSEX

2016 Area 3 Envirothon Muskingum County Soils Test ANSWER KEY

List of Equipment, Tools, Supplies, and Facilities:

Soils and the Environment. A Summary of RI Envirothon Study Materials Compiled by Sally Paul

Unit E: Basic Principles of Soil Science. Lesson 3: Understanding Soil Color

SOIL CHARACTERIZATION USING DIAGNOSTIC PROPERTIES

EDULABZ. Ans. (b) 7. The soft, porous layer with a good water-retaining capacity forms the

Waipu clay - YU Waipu peaty sand - YUay

SOIL SURVEY OF PORTIONS 81 AND 82 OFTHE FARM VAALBANK 512JQ, NEAR MAGALIESBURG, SOUTH-WEST OF PRETORIA

AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND NEAR MINDALE HOUSE PRESTATYN. Report 762/1

Effects of the Bupa retirement complex on the soil resources at 25 & 35 Ulyatt Road, Napier

2012 FINAL SOILS AREA 2 Envirothon Questions Answer KEY

PHYSICAL CHAtlACTERISTICS REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SAND AND GRAVEL SITE AT MANOR FARM, UFFINGTON

Soil is the Key (Chapter 3)

Agricultural Land Classification and Statement of Physical Characteristics Higbfield Farm Whitley Bridge North Yorkshire October 1996

Horner-McLaughlin Woods: Soil Types

5.1 Introduction to Soil Systems IB ESS Mrs. Page

Terminology & Soil Science. Andy Spetch

Loam: About 40% sand, 40% silt, 20% clay. Mixture of pore sizes to balance water retention and aeration. Considered the best soil for growing crops.

Level 1 Agricultural and Horticultural Science, 2011

Soils and plant nutrients

Soil Properties in the Rai/Pelorus Catchment. MDC Technical Report No:

Lesson 3: Understanding Soil Color

Soil Requirements of. Healthy Urban Trees

Drainage & wet soil management. Dr Bill Cotching

IOWA FFA STATE SOILS CDE SATURDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2007 AMES, IOWA

CLAY, SANDY AND PEAT SOILS, AND SOIL ORGANIC MATTER

5 RESULTS FOR THE REJECT EMPLACEMENT AREA

Restoration of Degraded Soils

Soil Maps for Production Agriculture. Jarrod O. Miller, Extension Agronomist

HEALTHY SOILS LANDHOLDER SERIES PROPERTY PLANNING GUIDE CHARACTERISTICS OF A HEALTHY SOIL LANDHOLDER SERIES - PROPERTY PLANNING GUIDE HEALTHY SOILS

Soil characteristics that influence nitrogen and water management

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

Soil Structure, Density, and Porosity. Laboratory #4

Unit II Soil Management

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching

Report on the soil evaluation at Harakeke 2015 Ltd Properties, Tasman District, Nelson

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

Site Selection. The #1 Most Important Step in Planting Anything Soils a major component. Physical Characteristics. Chemical Composition

SUMMARY. alcholnie.doc\ih\jk

CORNFORTH EAST QUARRY COUNTY DURHAM

1. Position (2 pts.) 2. Parent Material (2 pts.) 3. Slope Characteristics (2 pts.) 4. Surface Stoniness or Rockiness (2 pts.)

P/2014/00830 Received 27/06/2014 SOIL RESOURCES AND AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND AT ROLLESTON PARK FARM TUTBURY, STAFFORDSHIRE.

Soil 1/18/2012. Soils, Nutrients and Fertilizers Part I. Soil Profile

Tilth: Tilth: Soil Structure and its Management. Tilth: Soil Structure and its Management

SITE TOPSOIL & FINISH GRADING

Soil resources in upper Basho Valley.

SOILS AND AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND OFF HOLT ROAD, ROSSETT. Report 1067/1

MAFF Ministry of Ifinil Agriculture Rsheries and Food

Key factors for movement of water in the flood plain

Introduction to Environmental Science. Soil Characteristics. Chapter 11 Soil

Using Land Capability Classifications

Soil Interpretations Erosion and Sedimentation Control Planning and Design Workshop

Soils and their Relationship with Agriculture

The Nature of Soil Soil Conservation Sustainable Ag.

Unearthing problem soils in the Lachlan Valley

Section 1. Judging the soil pit (questions 1-4)

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OLDWICK FARM, WEST LAVANT, WEST SUSSEX

Soil Management: the basis of sustainable agriculture

URBAN SOILS & SEATTLE EXAMPLES

Soils and Fertilizers. Leo Espinoza Soils Specialist

The issue of Protection of class I and class II soils in the One Plan

2017 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam

Soils and Land Use Test

Appendix 22 Soils and Land Capability

Soil Texture = %Sand, Silt & Clay in a soil.

Soil Management Site Selection, Soil Fertility. Warren Roberts George Kuepper

EARTH SCIENCE CONCEPTS -Geologic time scale

DIRT! APES Laboratory Activity

A Plant & Soil Ecosystem

THE FOREST NURSERY AND ITS SOILS

Sandy Soils. Sand. Silt. Sandy soils. Silty soils. Wind blown and alluvial parent materials. Low water holding capacity

THE SCORE CARD. Observed Soil Properties. Interpretive Soil Properties

Sam Houston Ranger District West/Central WUI Fuels Reduction Project Soil and Water Resources

Lesson 1: Recognizing the Characteristics of Soils and the Soil Requirements for Fruit and Nut Crops

Transcription:

This Technical Data Sheet describes the typical average properties of the specified soil. It is essentially a summary of information obtained from one or more profiles of this soil that were examined and described during the Topoclimate survey or previous surveys. It has been prepared in good faith by trained staff within time and budgetary limits. However, no responsibility or liability can be taken for the accuracy of the information and interpretations. Advise should be sought from soil and landuse experts before making landuse decisions on individual farms and paddocks. The characteristics of the soil at a specific location may differ in some details from those described here. No warranties are expressed or implied unless stated. Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 8 Soil name: Sobig Overview Sobig soils occupy about 3,500 ha on the high fans and terraces encircling the Takitimu Mountains. They are formed into moderately deep loess which overlies weathered tuffaceous greywacke gravels. They are poorly drained soils, with heavy silt loam texture, and gravel occuring below 45cm depth. These soils respond well to drainage, fertilisers and lime and are suited to pastoral grazing. Soil classification NZ Soil Classification (NZSC): Argillic Perch-gley Pallic; with stones; silty over clayey. Previous NZ Genetic Classification: Moderately to strongly gleyed yellow-brown earth. Classification explanation Sobig soils have been reclassified from the previous classification based the soil properties being more similar to Pallic soils than Brown soils. This is reflected in the firm clay enriched subsoil that is slowly permeable, and causes poor drainage due to the perching of water. Gravel typically occurs between 45 and 90cm depth, with heavy silt loam textures grading to silty clay in the subsoil. Soil phases and variants Identified units in the Sobig soils are: Sobig undulating moderately deep (SiU2): has gravel between 45 and 90cm and slopes of 0 7º Sobig rolling moderately deep (SiR2): has gravel between 45 and 90cm and slopes of 7 15º Sobig undulating shallow (SiU3): has gravel above 45cm and slopes of 0 7º The soil properties described in this Technical Data Sheet are based on the most common phase, Sobig undulating moderately deep (SiU2). Values for other phases and variants can be taken as being similar. Where they differ significantly they are recorded with a separate versatility rating, e.g., Sobig rolling moderately deep (SiR2). Associated soils Some soils that commonly occur in association with Sobig soils are: Wairaki: well drained soil on the same surface Mangapiri: poorly drained soil formed from mixed loess and mudstone; clayey textures Otanomomo: peat soils 1/5 Last updated 21/11/2002

Similar soils Some soils that have similar properties to Sobig soils are: Dipton: shallow soil on intermediate to high terraces Glenure: silty textures throughout the profile Braxton: dominantly deep soils on intermediate to low terraces Caroline: has a cemented iron pan in the subsoil Typical profile features The following is a generic or composite profile description representing the most common combination of characteristics for this soil type. The actual profiles for which descriptions and data are are listed at the end of this Technical Data Sheet. ZT4 profile Ap Btg 2BCt(g) Horizon Depth (cm) Description Ap 0 25 Greyish yellow-brown silt loam; few bright brown mottles; weak soil strength; strongly developed fine polyhedral structure; abundant roots Btg 25 59 Yellowish grey slightly gravelly silty clay; common bright brown mottles; few worm casts; weak soil strength; moderately developed fine to medium polyhedral structure; gravel strongly weathered; common roots 2BCt(g) 59 90 Bright reddish brown very gravelly silty clay; common light grey mottles; dense particle packing; moderately developed medium prismatic structure; gravel strongly weathered; few roots Key profile features Sobig soils have a 20 25cm deep topsoil with moderate to strong structure. Subsoils have a moderately developed structure, with moderate to strongly weathered gravel below 45cm depth. Clay has accumulated in the subsoil, resulting in clayey textures. The greyish olive subsoil colours reflect the poor drainage, due to water perching on a dense clay-enriched subsoil horizon. 2/5

Typical physical properties Note: values in Italics are estimates Horizon Depth (cm) Bulk density Permeability Texture Gravel content Ap 0 25 Moderate Moderate Silt loam Gravel free Btg 25 59 Moderate High Slow Silty clay Slightly gravelly 2BCt(g) 59 90 Slow Silty clay Very gravelly Profile drainage: Poorly drained Plant readily water: Moderately high Potential rooting depth: Rooting restriction: Key physical properties Moderately deep Very gravelly subsoil Rooting depth is moderately deep and plant water is moderately high, being limited by the gravelliness of the lower subsoil. Permeability is moderate, grading to slow in the dense lower subsoil. Textures grade from heavy silt loams in the topsoil to silty clay in the subsoil, with a topsoil clay content of 30 40%. Topsoils and upper subsoil are commonly slightly gravelly, with very gravelly horizons occuring between 45 and 90cm depth. Typical chemical properties Depth Horizon ph P retention CEC BS Ca Mg K Na (cm) Ap 0 25 Moderate Moderate High Moderate High Low Moderate Low Btg 25 59 Moderate Low Moderate Moderate Moderate Low Very low Low 2BCt(g) 59 90 Moderate Low Moderate High Moderate High Very low Low Key chemical properties Topsoil organic matter levels are about 11%; P-retention values 25 40%; ph values moderate. Cation exchange capacity, base saturation and calcium levels are moderate but magnesium and potassium availability is low. Natural levels of phosphorus and sulphur are also low. Micro-nutrient levels are generally adequate, although boron responses in brassicas and molybdenum responses in legumes can occur. Responses to lime, phosphate, sulphur and potassium can be expected. 3/5

Vulnerability to environmental degradation Note: the vulnerability ratings given in the table below are generalised and should not be taken as absolutes for this soil type in all situations. The actual risk depends on the environmental and management conditions prevailing at a particular place and time. Specialist advice should be sought before making management decisions that may have environmental impacts. Where vulnerability ratings of Moderate to Very severe are indicated, advice may be sought from Environment Southland or a farm management consultant. Vulnerability factor Rating Vulnerability compared to other Southland soils Structural compaction Moderate These soils have a moderate vulnerability to structural degradation by long-term cultivation, or compaction by heavy stocking and vehicles. This rating reflects the poor drainage but moderate P-retention and heavy silt loam texture in the topsoil. Nutrient leaching Slight These soils have a slight vulnerability to leaching to groundwater. This rating reflects the moderately high waterholding capacity and the slow subsoil permeability. Topsoil erodibility by water Slight Due to the clay content, the topsoil erodibility of these soils is moderate. Erodibility is highly dependent on management, particularly when there is no vegetation cover. Organic matter loss Slight Vulnerability to long-term decline in soil organic matter levels is partly dependent on soil properties, and highly dependent on management practices (e.g., crop residue management and cultivation practices). Waterlogging Severe These soils have a severe vulnerability to waterlogging during wet periods. This rating reflects the poor drainage and slowly permeable subsoil. General landuse versatility ratings for Sobig soils Note: The versatility ratings in the table below are indicative of the major limitations for semi-intensive to intensive landuse. These ratings differ from those used in the past in that sustainability factors are incorporated in the classification. Refer to the Topoclimate district soil map or property soil map to determine which of the soil symbols listed below are applicable, then check the versatility ratings for that symbol in the appropriate table. SiU2 (Sobig undulating moderately deep) SiU3 (Sobig undulating shallow) Versatility evaluation for soil SiU2, SiU3 Landuse Versatility rating Main limitation Non-arable horticulture Arable Intensive pasture Risk of short-term Forestry Inadequate aeration during wet periods; vulnerability to sustained waterlogging. 4/5

SiR2 (Sobig rolling moderately deep) Versatility evaluation for soil SiR2 Landuse Versatility rating Main limitation Non-arable horticulture Arable Inadequate aeration during wet periods; rolling slopes Intensive pasture Risk of short-term Forestry Inadequate aeration during wet periods; vulnerability to sustained waterlogging. Management practices that may improve soil versatility Installation and maintenance of subsurface mole and tile drainage. Stony subsoils may prevent mole installation in shallow soils. Organic matter levels should be carefully maintained and enhanced Careful management after heavy rain and wet periodswill reduce the impact of short-term waterlogging. Intensive stocking, cultivation and vehicle traffic should be minimised during these periods. Soil profiles for Sobig soils Soil symbol Profile ID Topoclimate map sheet Profile description Physical data Chemical data Profile photo SiU2 ZT4 43 SiU2 158/72/10 7 Published by Crops for Southland with financial support from Environment Southland. Copyright 2002, Crops for Southland This Technical Data Sheet may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. Crops for Southland and Environment Southland would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this Technical Data Sheet as a source. No use of this Technical Data Sheet may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from Crops for Southland. Crops for Southland PO Box 1306, Invercargill. New Zealand www.cropssouthland.co.nz 5/5