FORMAT FOR THE SUBMISSION OF STATE OF CONSERVATION REPORTS BY THE STATES PARTIES (in compliance with Paragraph 169 of the Operational Guidelines)

Similar documents
Living with World Heritage in Africa

UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE

CONSERVATION PLAN BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF INTEGRITY

UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION

Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention

Workshop on the Management of Historic Urban Landscapes of the XXth century, December 2007 Chandigarh, India

Dr Mechtild Rossler (UNESCO World Heritage Centre): World Heritage and Cultural Heritage Management: New Conservation Challenges

UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE

Resolution XII NOTING also that with the increasingly rapid urbanization, wetlands are being threatened in two principle ways:

1. World Heritage Property Data. 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value. 3. Factors Affecting the Property Other factor(s) Page 1

1. World Heritage Property Data. 3. Factors Affecting the Property Other factor(s) 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value.

The Urban Regeneration of Historic Cairo Towards a Management Plan for Conservation and Regeneration The UNESCO technical assistance project

Draft Resolution XII.10

1. World Heritage Property Data

1. World Heritage Property Data. 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value

1. World Heritage Property Data. 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value. 3. Factors Affecting the Property

1. World Heritage Property Data. 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value. Page 1

UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE

Implementation of the European Landscape Convention in Lithuania

Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Section 79 and Town and Country Planning (Inquiries Procedure) (England) Rules 2000

1. World Heritage Property Data. 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value. 3. Factors Affecting the Property Other factor(s) Page 1

1. World Heritage Property Data. 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value. 3. Factors Affecting the Property Other factor(s) Page 1

1. World Heritage Property Data. 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value. 3. Factors Affecting the Property Other factor(s) Page 1

1. World Heritage Property Data. 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value

Report on the works being implemented in historical centre of Shakhrisyabz city (included to the World Heritage List on

Nominations for the 2007 Melina Mercouri International Prize for the Safeguarding and Management of Cultural Landscapes (UNESCO-Greece)

1. World Heritage Property Data. 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value. 3. Factors Affecting the Property Other factor(s) Page 1

FEEDBACK FORM GEORGE TOWN WORLD HERITAGE SITE SPECIAL AREA PLAN (REVIEW)

JOINT DECLARATION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA ON A PARTNERSHIP FOR SMART & SUSTAINABLE URBANISATION. New Delhi, 6 Oct 2017

State of Palestine State of Conservation Report for

Capacity Building for Impact Assessments

for Biosphere Reserves

1. World Heritage Property Data. 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value

Ministry of Natural Resources, Mining and Spatial Planning of the Republic of Serbia Biljana Filipovic Technical Assistance Team Montenegro, Cetinje

HERITAGE POLICY...Safeguarding the Built Heritage. Conservation Plans. A Guide to the Preparation of Conservation Plans

1. World Heritage Property Data. 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value

Each State Party may propose a maximum of two properties, preferably relating to one cultural and one natural site.

GHF Banteay Chhmar 2008 Progress Report Summary By John Sanday O.B.E., GHF Field Director Asia

GREATER SHEPPARTON CULTURAL HERITAGE AWARDS GUIDELINES

Town of Cobourg Heritage Master Plan. Statutory Public Meeting

1. World Heritage Property Data. 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value. Page 1

Ontario Invasive Plant Council

ip~//jzl~/ Ah~~ 20 18/ UNESCO DT/ Paris, 31 January 2018 Dear Director Rossler,

Each State Party may propose a maximum of two properties, preferably relating to one cultural and one natural site.

1. World Heritage Property Data. 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value

Cotswolds AONB Landscape Strategy and Guidelines. June 2016

Understanding the World Heritage Outstanding Universal Value. Dubrovnik workshop 9 September 2014 KL

TEXAS CHAPTER AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 2019 PROFESSIONAL AWARDS GUIDELINES

SUSTAINABLE CONSERVATION SYSTEMS FOR PRESERVATION OF MONUMENTS, SITES IN THEIR SETTINGS

Town of Blooming Grove Comprehensive Plan. Public Meeting October 13, 2004

Annex D: Project Logframe Matrix

Western Sydney Parklands Australia s Largest Urban Park

Salalah Recommendation

Communicating World Heritage: Newgrange and the Bend of the Boyne (Brú na Bóinne) World Heritage Site

ICOMOS Technical Review. Phase II of HIA of Stockholm Bypass and Ekëro Road projects

Published in March 2005 by the. Ministry for the Environment. PO Box , Wellington, New Zealand ISBN: X.

IUCN World Heritage Advice Note Environmental Assessment & World Heritage

JOINT UNESCO-ICOMOS MISSION TO CITY OF VICENZA AND THE PALLADIAN VILLAS OF THE VENETO (ITALY) FROM 23 TO 24 MARCH 2005

Streets for People, Place-Making and Prosperity. #TOcompletestreets

9 CITY OF VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO BOCA EAST INVESTMENTS LIMITED

Call for Proposals. Heritage, natural capital and ecosystem services: case studies. Project No: Date of Issue: Tuesday 14 th November 2017

HERITAGE ACTION PLAN. Towards a renewed Heritage Conservation Program. What is the Heritage Action Plan? Key areas of work. A Collaborative Approach

SAFEGUARDING INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY

W a l l e d C i t i e s, O p e n S o c i e t i e s S i e n a, I t a l y J a n u a r y

NUDP Sessional Paper No.6 of NUDP background & coverage

1. World Heritage Property Data. 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value

San Francisco General Plan Preservation Element: Objectives 7-9. Historic Preservation Commission August 20, 2014

Legal protection of monuments in their settings: a means of maintaining the spirit of the place

NEW DELHI ICOMOS GENERALASSEMBLY REVIEW DRAFT 25 FEBRUARY 2017

RECOMMENDATION ON THE HISTORIC URBAN LANDSCAPE

The Palisades Interstate Parkway and Henry Hudson Drive designated a New Jersey State Scenic Byway, 2005

VISIONING CONFERENCE OUTPUTS

1. World Heritage Property Data. 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value. 3. Factors Affecting the Property Other factor(s) Page 1

The Pimachiowin Aki Management Plan: A case-study of collaborative planning in Canada s boreal forest.

WHAT DEFINES A NATIONAL PARK CITY

The Landscape in the revision of the municipal master plans: Guidelines for the implementation of the European Landscape Convention

BEDFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING REPORT

The Gianyar Declaration 2017

BUSINESS PLAN CEN/TC 164 WATER SUPPLY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE WORLD HERITAGE CONVENTION

WORLD CULTURAL HERITAGE THE GRAND CANAL (C 1443) STATE OF CONSERVATION (SOC) State Administration of Cultural Heritage, P.R.

1. World Heritage Property Data. 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value. 3. Factors Affecting the Property Other factor(s) Page 1

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

High Speed Rail (London- West Midlands)

STANDARDS OF INTERNATIONAL CULTURAL AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT

1. World Heritage Property Data

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

SALALAH GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES

Sustainability Statement. Whitby Business Park Area Action Plan

1. World Heritage Property Data. 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value. Statement of Significance

Streets for All East of England

FINAL FORT WAINWRIGHT NORTH POST DISTRICT AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN FEBRUARY 2015

WORKSHOP 2 STRATEGIES AND POLICY DOCUMENTS IN FAVOUR OF THE LANDSCAPE: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES CROATIA

BUSINESS PLAN CEN/TC 162 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING INCLUDING HAND AND ARM PROTECTION AND LIFEJACKETS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Heritage Impact Assessment: Evaluating Development at Heritage Sites Joseph King, Sites Unit

ANNEX A CONCEPT FOR SUSTAINABLE URBAN MOBILITY PLANS. to the

Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

International World Heritage Expert Meeting on. Visual Integrity. 6 to 9 March Agra, India

ICOMOS-IFLA PRINCIPLES CONCERNING RURAL LANDSCAPES AS HERITAGE

Kew WHS and the challenges of the regeneration of Brentford

Transcription:

Annex 13 of the Operational Guidelines FORMAT FOR THE SUBMISSION OF STATE OF CONSERVATION REPORTS BY THE STATES PARTIES (in compliance with Paragraph 169 of the Operational Guidelines) Historic Centre of Bukhara (Uzbekistan (602)) 1. Executive Summary of the report The historic centre of Bukhara is a significant city of science, culture and education. Bukhara is a well preserved city on the Silk Road in Central Asia with outstanding religious monuments, traditional houses in narrow streets and water channels which retain its unique historic medieval character. Bukhara s cultural heritage provides a link to the region s rich past while also offering future possible benefits for its residents and visitors. Arts and crafts activities as well as ecotourism are well recognized and positioned to become developed. The dynamic historic centre of Bukhara is full of life, enjoyable for its community and visitors, yet it must be better interpreted, preserved and enhanced so that its values can be understood by all, so that tourists may return home and share the knowledge they have learned. The state of conservation report contains the recent restoration and conservation work which has been carried out in the last year. At the 39th session, the World Heritage Committee requested the State Party of Uzbekistan to invite a joint World Heritage Centre (WHC) / ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission to the Historic Centre of Bukhara (25 to 29 March 2016) World Heritage property. The objective of the monitoring mission was to evaluate the general state of conservation of the property and review its current management effectiveness, planning system, progress made with the completion of the Management Plan, and other conservation issues which may have an impact on the property s Outstanding Universal Value. In January 2016, following the decision of the World Heritage Centre on the Historic Centre of Bukhara (37COM7 B.68), Principal Department for the Preservation and Utilization of Cultural Objects of the Ministry of Culture and Sports of Uzbekistan has finished the proposed document of the Minor Modification of boundaries and new buffer zone of the Historic Centre of Bukhara and sent to the World Heritage Centre for consideration. The boundaries and new buffer zone were approved. Taking into account the World Heritage Committee Decisions which repeatedly requests Uzbekistan to develop a management plans (35COM7B.79, 37COM7B.68, 39COM7B.72), UNESCO Office in Tashkent together with the Principal Department for the Preservation and Utilization of Cultural Objects, Interregional Bukhara and Navoi Inspection for the Preservation and Utilization of Cultural Objects, as well as national and international experts organized three national workshops (2013, 2014 and 2015) within the framework of the UNESCO Office in Tashkent regular programme Implementation of the World Heritage Convention and International Assistance project MAPAUZ: Management Plans of World Heritage Properties in Uzbekistan on heritage management.

216 cultural heritages were located in the Historic centre. Among them, 173 sites have cadastre documents and register: 27 madrassahs, 44 mosques, 12 caravansarais, 52 historical houses and other objects. In 2016, the Interregional Bukhara and Navoi Inspection repaired and maintained 12 objects of the cultural heritage on the amount of 14,425mln sums (USD 4580). From December 2015 to May 2016, more than 100 sites were inventoried by the local specialists where the defective documents and photo albums were prepared. In this year, 4 sites situated in the Historical centre were restored by using national and local funds (2.0 billion sums USD 634920.64). Moreover, 10 sites were restored depending on sponsorship and charitable donations. 2. Response to the Decision of the World Heritage Committee According to Decision 39 COM 7B.72 the World Heritage Committee requested: 2.1 The World Heritage Committee expresses its concern with the slow progress in implementing the recommendations of the 2010 Reactive Monitoring mission, in particular the lack of progress with the completion of the Management Plan, including an adequate governance system, as well as the lack of coordinated conservation plan and adequate guidance for the conservation and restoration activities carried out as part of the State Program and requests the State Party to address these issues, through: As above mentioned, the series of training on the development of the Management Plan have been carried out for the last three years. During these workshops, a methodology (see Annex 1) and an action plan for the development of the Management Plan of the World Heritage properties: the Historic Centre of Bukhara were adopted and approved by the authorities of the Republic of Uzbekistan. In 2014, 2015 and 2016, following the methodology, three workshops were organized for the preparation of the Management Plan. It counted with the active participation of the local stakeholders, such as the representatives of the hokimiyat, mahallas, inspection, Uzbektourism, local and international experts. It is planned to complete the Management Plan at the beginning of the 2017. During the consulting meeting devoted to implementation of the HUL, it was agreed to develop a UNESCO publication about Illustrated Conservation Guidelines for the protection of architectural features of the Historic Centre of Bukhara. This document could serve as a pilot project that could be reproduced for the other World Heritage Properties. 2.2 Encourages the State Party to apply the UNESCO Recommendation on Historic Urban Landscape (HUL, 2011) as a useful tool to help manage development within the property and to seek International Assistance under the World Heritage Fund, in close consultation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies; On 19 th -22 October 2016, the first meeting of the UNESCO/Netherlands Funds-in-Trust project with the support of the World Heritage Centre Application of the UNESCO Recommendation

on Historic Urban landscape (HUL, 2011) at the World Heritage properties of the Historic Centre of Bukhara and Samarkand, Uzbekistan took place in Bukhara. The Historic Urban Landscape Approach with some illustrative examples was introduced to the stakeholders. The attendants were the heads of the regional inspections, the staff of the inspection of Bukhara, two international experts, local authorities, specialists from the Master Plan, mahalla representatives and two local experts. An introduction about conservation guidelines was presented and discussed. The List of Recommendation was developed during the consultation meeting (see Annex 2). 2.3 The State Party should invite a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission to the property to evaluate the general state of conservation of the property and review its current management and planning system. From 25 to 29 March 2016, the joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission to the Historic Centre of Bukhara took place. During the mission, the overall state of conservation of the property was considered, and the progress in implementing the recommendations of the 2010 Reactive Monitoring Mission was reviewed. 3.Other current conservation issues identified by the State(s) Party(ies) which may have an impact on the property s Outstanding Universal Value In 2015, the nominated area of the Historic centre of Bukhara was 200 ha and buffer zone was 275. As a result of the joint work of the regional architects, Interregional Bukhara and Navoi Inspection and UESCO Tashkent Office, the nominated area expanded by 16 ha, and nowadays it is 216 ha. Buffer zone increased by64 ha and now includes 339 ha. The additional area covers five historical objects: Samanids mausoleum and haus (pool), Chashma Ayub mousoleum, Talipoch gate and walls remains. 4. In conformity with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines, describe any potential major restorations, alterations and/or new construction(s) intended within the property, the buffer zone(s) and/or corridors or other areas, where such developments may affect the Outstanding Universal Value of the property, including authenticity and integrity. The major restoration or reconstruction works are not planned within the nominated area. 5. This report can be uploaded for public access inthe World Heritage Centre s State of conservation Information System (http://whc.unesco.org/en/soc). Mr. Akbar Mukhamedov, Head of Interregional Bukhara and Navoi Inspection of the Ministry of Culture and Sports of Uzbekistan List of Annexes: Annex 1 Management Plan methodology Annex 2 Recommendation made during the HUL consulting meeting

Annex 1 Implementationn of the UNESCO recommendation on Historic Urban Landscape of World Heritage Properties in Samarkand and Bukhara, Uzbekistan 18 21 October 2016 Samarkand and Bukhara, Uzbekistan Recommendations The participants made the following recommendations: 1. Supplement the legislative framework in the field of preservation of cultural heritage through developing laws, regulations and provisions for the existing laws (for sitess inscribed in the World Heritage List); 2. Finance, subsidize (through low interest loans, tax credits, etc.) the owners of traditional houses to preserve and maintain the historic appearance of the traditional housing stock; 3. Restore and continuously maintainn historic irrigation and drainage systems (collectors). These works are expected to be financed from private funds and attracted funds from international organizations; 4. Develop building codes for historic areas/neighborhoods of cities of Uzbekistan; 5. Restore the traditional dendrology in historic cities: plane trees, mulberry, elm (gudzhum), etc.; 6. Promote the improvement of tourist infrastructure; have more cultural heritage sites as objects of travel. Special attention should be paid to the various types of tourism, including pilgrimage; 7. Develop recommendations for the conservation of cultural heritage (in the form of visual guidelines, with the support of UNESCO)

Methodology Annex 2 1 Preparing Aims What are the aims and expectations? Stakeholders Who should be involved? Identification and description Documentation What Is the baseline information? Understanding Planning 2 Assessing Values OUV Attributes, authenticity and integrity Why is important? 4 Responding Maintenance Physical Condition/Risks What is the Soc & Threats? Interpretation, presentation and visitor management? Boundaries & buffer zones? 3 Identifying Key Issues Establishing Vision Statement and Policies How the OUV will be preserved? Setting Objectives How to translate policies into actions? Conservation Developing Action Plan Risk Mitigation Preparing a Plan Priorities, resources, responsibilities and timing Management Context How are the legislation and institutional frameworks protecting? Local awareness? Which are the socio economic benefits? Visitor Management 6 Monitoring, Reporting and Reviewing Monitoring Plan, World Heritage Committee decisions, timetable for review Implementing 5 Implementing Actions Annual Work Plan, Project formulation, Indication of Resources