Recommended changes to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation

Similar documents
PUBLIC PARKS AND FACILITIES, SERVING NEIGHBORHOOD RECREATIONAL AND COMMUNITY EVENTS BUILDINGS BUILT TO THE LINE AND ORIENTED TOWARD THE STREET

City of Woodinville Planning Commission Study Session. Development Regulations 101: An Overview of Specific Regulatory Items To Help You in 2012

Lehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Community Planning Project

LAND USE ELEMENT. Purpose. General Goals & Policies

LAND USE OVERVIEW WHAT YOU WILL FIND IN THIS CHAPTER

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

6 PORT SYDNEY SETTLEMENT AREA

BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION

ATTACHMENT A. Definition of Activity Centers

SOUTH NATOMAS COMMUNITY PLAN

ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 18 ZONING SECTION 20A NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL - NMD

APPENDIX D. Potential Snow Disposal Sites

Auke Bay Area Plan. Complete List of Goals and Policies for the Auke Bay Area Plan

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

General Location Annex, Rezone & Preliminary Plat Lansdowne Addition, Unit Three

Proposed Comprehensive Plan Strategies DRAFT for discussion June 28, 2017

Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Guilderland that the following new A (Transit Oriented Development (TOD) District) is adopted:

Rio/29 Future Land Use Alternatives. Rio/29 Small Area Plan Phase 1 December 12, 2016

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

CHAPTER 10. LAND USE

Vision Statement for the Town of Flower Mound Master Plan The Town of Flower Mound Master Plan furthers the established community based vision to:

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

City of Sugar Hill Planning Staff Report CBD Design Review

What Does It Take To Create A Town Center?

3.10 LAND USE SETTING PROJECT SITE EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING. General Plan Land Use Designations.

Chapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS

City Center Neighborhood Plan

What Pioneer Grove Will Look Like?

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

POCKET COMMUNITY PLAN

Dwelling Units Max 12 dwelling units per acre/min 8 dwelling units per acre. Development Mix 80% non residential/20% residential

CITY OF COLWICH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE LAND USE 1

Public Meeting March 10 th 2011

Improve Neighborhood Design and Reduce Non Point Source Water Pollution

A. Selma Park, Davis Bay and Wilson Creek

LAND USE MEADOWS PLANNING AREA

Living in Albemarle County s Urban Places

GENERAL LAND USE POLICIES

17.11 Establishment of Land Use Districts

Cover Design Glen Fairchild. Cover Photography Dave Klein KleinDesigns & Pat McGonagel Didjuneau Fine Art Photography

PROTOTYPE DESIGN/INTRODUCTION

4. Shape Transitions. 4. Shape Transitions

Burton Station Village Community Meeting February 26, 2014

Heart of the Triad A Dynamic Plan for the Future. Steering and Technical Meeting April 27, 2006

Tri-County Transportation & Land Use Study. Steering Committee Meeting May 14, 2009

SUSSEX COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WORKSHOP

Cover Design Glen Fairchild. Cover Photography Dave Klein KleinDesigns & Pat McGonagel Didjuneau Fine Art Photography

POLICIES & REGULATIONS

LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS

APPENDIX D: BACKGROUND AND VISION

Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel Meeting #3

Cover Design Glen Fairchild. Cover Photography Dave Klein KleinDesigns & Pat McGonagel Didjuneau Fine Art Photography

Floyds Fork Area Study Project Overview, Suitability Analysis, & Form Districts July 29, title

Keyport. Vision for Keyport

To ensure that resources will be available to provide a consistent level of public services to the community.

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

Strategic Growth Area #1 Northampton Boulevard Corridor Area

Additional information about land use types is given in Chapter 5. Design guidelines for Centers and Neighborhoods are given in Chapter 7.

Rural Land Use Designations Kittitas County December 6, 2007 Draft

LAND USE CATEGORIES. City of Sparks Comprehensive Plan Land Use Categories - Draft

LAND USE CATEGORIES. City of Sparks Comprehensive Plan Chapter Two: Pathway to the Future - Draft 1

Best Practices Appendix: Waterfront Communities

Town Center. Block 5 Existing multifamily residential units are expected to remain.

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

NORTH LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA

Micco Park Village Development

LAND PARK COMMUNITY PLAN

Westbound: A One-day Exploration of Growth

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

CHAPTER 11. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAPS

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

Sectional Map Amendment

Community Development

FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AREAS

STUDY AREA. Tonight s Agenda. Project Tasks Completed. Next Steps. Town of Oyster Bay Eastern Waterfront Community Vision & Revitalization Plan

Village of Fair Haven Goals & Objectives

TEAM INPUT SUMMARY. Postcard Image?

Silver Line CPAM UPDATE. Transportation and Land Use Committee October 14, 2016

Prosperity Hucks Area Plan. Transportation and Planning Committee May 11, 2015

The Floyds Fork Area Study A Framework for Growth

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PINELLAS COUNTY MPO LIVABLE COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

Table of Contents. 1. Future Land Use FLU Housing H-1 Goal 1 H-1 Goal 2 H-4

Zoning Interface: Districts and Forms for Sioux Falls Zoning Ordinance

ARTICLE XXXIII (O) OJUS URBAN AREA DISTRICT

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Communities Plan. Parkland-Spanaway-Midland. LUAC Review of Draft Policies

Amendment to the Elderberry Neighborhood Development Plan

PINE CURVE REZONING. BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002

A P P E N D I X B - O P P O R T U N I T Y S I T E S

Town of Liberty, NY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & ZONING UPDATES

City Of Sparks Planning Commission Item

New Official Plan Quest November 2013

THE NEIGHBORHOOD TODAY

BUILDER LOTS FOR SALE

E. RURAL COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PARK MODEL

Definitions. Average Daily Traffic Demand (ADT): The actual number or projected number of cars that pass a point in a 24-hour period.

Metro. Activity Center Design Guidelines. Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers

2900 Steeles Avenue East at Don Mills Road in the Town of Markham

NWI Wetland Public Waters Inventory Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential. High Density Residential. Public or Institutional

Mariposa Lakes. Planned Community. Project Overview. Stockton, CA

Transcription:

Recommended changes to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation Purpose of Comprehensive Plan land use designations The designation provides a long term vision of the use/ density/ intensity of neighborhoods through guiding changes in zoning districts. Example: Low-density Residential, single family/ duplex. It also provides direction for zoning districts. Example: D-1 or D-3 residential. Zoning districts doesn t always match the land use designation. The zoning district regulates how land can be used. Land use designations don t have regulatory measures like zoning. Why change the land use designation? A new land use designation needs to be established to best match future Small Town Center uses and form (Multi-story, mixed use buildings, etc.), within the Center plan area. This will help achieve the goals of the area. Without changing the land use designation, the Auke Bay Area Plan conflicts with existing land use designations and therefore cannot be adopted. What do we envision and how do we get it? New Small Town Center Comprehensive Plan envisioned a village in the center area of Auke Bay (i.e. Squires Restaurant) June 2014 Charrette: Showed a desire for a small cluster of mixed-used, multi-story buildings and future grid-street network. This area became known as a Small Town Center, smaller than Downtown Juneau, but denser than existing development in the Auke Bay area. How do we get a Small Town Center Starts with the right Comp. Plan Land Use Designation(s), followed by the right zoning district(s) and design of buildings, streetscapes, parking, etc. 1

Staff s recommended Comp. Plan Land Use designation: Option 1 See Option 1 Map Swap part of Marine/ Mixed Use with Traditional Town Center (TTC) uphill from Glacier Highway. Keep Marine/ Mixed Use () downhill from Glacier Hwy. Reasons behind this idea: Greater emphasis in encouraging a mixed-use, multi-story development setting for the area envisioned for the Small Town Center; Retains mixed use and a marine component setting along the shoreline; The established homes along Bayview, Cross, and Seaview would not be affected by commercial, mixed use developments; Covers only the core area shown in the Community Charrette Map; and May be easier to adopt. Issues/ limitations: May appear limiting if the TTC doesn t encompass other properties within the Center planning area; and Doesn t encompass areas around future grid streets within Center area. Option 2 See Option 2 Map Swap part of Marine/ Mixed Use with Traditional Town Center (TTC) within the entire Center planning area boundary uphill from Glacier Hwy and leaves everything else as is. Reasons behind this idea: Allow all areas within the Center planning area to be encouraged to develop into a Small Town Center over time; Retains mixed use and a marine component setting along the shoreline; Doesn t have the limitations as Option 1; Issues/ Limitations: Established residences may oppose nearby mixed use commercial developments. Please keep in mind that Zoning changes will be the best element to address this type of issue. 2

Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation definitions Existing Comprehensive Plan Land Use designations in the Center area Recreational Service Park (RS) o Recreation Service Parks include CBJ-owned lands with parks developed for active recreation, programmed use, and/or community gardens. Recreation, parking, playgrounds and fields, ski lifts, All-Terrain Vehicle (ATV) riding parks, rifle ranges, operations and maintenance-related structures are possible uses or components of RS designated lands. These lands should be zoned to prevent residential, commercial, and industrial development, as well as resource extraction activities beyond those accessory to park development. The CBJ should retain ownership of these lands. As many of the existing RS-designated lands are smaller than the minimum area required for a unique zone, these lands must be within the zoning district that surrounds or abuts them. (emphasis added) Marine/ Mixed Use () o These lands are characterized by high density residential and nonresidential land uses in areas in and around harbors and other water-dependent recreational or commercial/industrial areas. Typically, neighborhood serving and marine-related retail, marine industrial, personal service, food and beverage services, recreational services, transit and transportation services should be allowed and encouraged, as well as medium- and high density residential uses at densities ranging from 10 to 60 residential units per acre. Ground floor retail space facing roads with parking behind the retail and housing above would be an appropriate and efficient use of the land. Float homes, live-a-boards, and house boats, if necessary services (such as sewer) are provided to berthing locations, are appropriate for these areas. (emphasis added) Institutional and Public Use () o Lands that are in public ownership and dedicated for a variety of public uses, such as the University of Alaska Southeast; local, state and federal government uses; and for such public facilities as community gardens, schools, libraries, fire stations, treatment plants, and public sanitary landfills. Included are potential sites for future boat harbors, schools, parks, farmers markets, publiclysupported arts events, permitted arts or food-service kiosks or 3

sales activities, parking facilities and road and public transit system easements. Also included are public aircraft facilities. The public use of these lands will vary widely, so -designated lands can be under any zoning district, with the uses thereon appropriate for that zone as regulated in the Table of Permissible Uses (CBJ 49.25.300); the zone of any particular public use should be the same district as the surrounding or abutting lands. Medium Density Residential () o These lands are characterized by urban residential lands for multifamily dwelling units at densities ranging from 5 to 20 units per acre. Any commercial development should be of a scale consistent with a residential neighborhood, as regulated in the Table of Permissible Uses (CBJ 49.25.300). Land Use Designations that don t exist in Auke Bay (Exist in Downtown and Mendenhall Mall areas) Traditional Town Center These lands are characterized by high density residential and nonresidential land uses in downtown areas and around shopping centers, the University, major employment centers and public transit corridors, as well as other areas suitable for a mixture of retail, office, general commercial, and high density residential uses at densities at 18 or more residential units per acre. Residential and non-residential uses could be combined within a single structure, including off-street parking. Ground floor retail space facing roads with parking behind the retail and housing above would be an appropriate and efficient use of the land. 4

Comp. Plan Land Use Designation Change Either choose existing land use designation; OR Make new land use designation A) Either choose existing land use designation Pro s Easier than making new land use designation(s) Already know the definitions of designation(s) May not contain everything envisioned for Small Town Center Con s May not contain everything envisioned for Small Town Center Stuck with terminology May be stuck with less-than-ideal densities of the designation(s) B) Make new (custom) land use designation Pro s Create the best-fitting designation for density, uses, intensities, etc. Create the best-sounding land use designation term for the area. Con s Could result in too many land use designations creates confusion. Could be too time-intensive in creating a best-fitting designation Would it truly be better than Option A? 5

RS RD(T) ULDRL(T) ULDRU Center Boundary Comp. Plan Land Use Designations Existing 6

n RS RD(T) ULDRL(T) ULDRU TTC Center Boundary Comp. Plan Land Use Designations Option 1 7

RS RD(T) ULDRL(T) ULDRU TTC Center Boundary Comp. Plan Land Use Designations Option 2A 8

LDR RS RD( ULDRL(T) ULDRU TTC Center Boundary Comp. Plan Land Use Designations Option 2B 9