Rangeland Interagency Ecological. Dennis W. Thompson National Range and Grazing Lands Ecologist USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service

Similar documents
New Tools for Land Management: A Quick Introduction to Ecological Site Descriptions

New Tools for Conservation: Ecological Site Descriptions and Their Role in Conservation Planning

Ecological Sites. Topics of Discussion 2/28/2014. Ecological Site Classification. Ecological Site Key. Ecological Site Descriptions

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA CHECKLIST OPEN SPACE CLASSIFICATION

Checklists. Project Name: Location: File Number: Date of Submittal: Reviewer: Date: Applicant: Contact Name: Phone Number:

Woodland Conservation and the Master Plan

TOWN OF SPRINGFIELD, NEW HAMPSHIRE

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

systems is available on the Colorado Wetland Information Center (CWIC) website.

Green Infrastructure Policies and Ordinances

Conservation Plan. I. Property Information. II. Objectives. Natural Resource Objectives. Sustainability in Practice (SIP) Certified

CONSERVATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Community LID Workgroup Issue Paper #6

Florida Forever Conservation Needs Assessment Overview Maps

TOWNSHIP OF LOGAN SOIL & FILL IMPORTATION AND PLACEMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

Rangeland Health (Rangeland only)

Chapter XV Maps. The map is not the territory ~Alfred Korzybski


Appendix E Soils Information

DRAFT SCOPE FOR THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR HUDSON HIGHLANDS RESERVE TOWN OF PHILIPSTOWN, NEW YORK June 5, 2018

HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Goal 1 To establish and follow land use patterns for the long-range development of the campus.

Hydric Soils - Overview

Non-Metallic Mining Reclamation Checklist

RECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND GREENWAYS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Middle Mississippi River. Regional Corridor

Minnesota Department of Natural Resource - Natural Resource Guidance Checklist Conserving Natural Resources through Density Bonuses

Great Lakes Conservation Blueprint for Terrestrial Biodiversity on the Canadian Shield

Draft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

Ecosystem Restoration Business Line Budgeting A Systems Approach

INTERMOUNTAIN WEST JOINT VENTURE Strengthening Alliances for Conservation

Using AutoCAD Civil 3D and ESRI ArcGIS to meet LEED-ND (Neighborhood Development) Requirements NDIA O Brien & Gere. All Rights Reserved.

Public Review Draft Oceanside Subarea Habitat Conservation Plan/ Natural Communities Conservation Plan

Community Conservation Workshop. Saranac River Basin Communities

Chapter 4 - Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans

When planning stormwater management facilities, the following principles shall be applied where possible.

Chapter 3 Site Planning and Low Impact Development

SOIL DATA: Avondale. in Allen, TX. This information was taken from NRCS web soil survey of Collin County, Texas.

Landscape Conservation Design June, 2014

Whitemarsh Township Greenway Plan

DRAFT Anan Wildlife Observatory Recreation Site Master Plan. Prepared by: Wrangell Ranger District Tongass National Forest Alaska

CITY OF LONDON COVES ESA CONSERVATION MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1

History as a source for understanding todays landscape Ingrid Sarlöv Herlin, SLU, Sweden

ST. MARY S SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT (SMSCD) AND DPW&T CONCEPT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES AND CHECKLIST

TRCA Field Staking Protocol December 2016

Advanced Site Inventory Activity

NYC Envirothon 2017 Soil Science Review. Richard K Shaw USDA-NRCS

3-2 Environmental Systems

Key Elements of Successful Conservation Planning. John Paskus October 17, 2013 Pierce Cedar Creek Institute Michigan Natural Features Inventory

Aquatic, Terrestrial and Landscape Conservation Design Tools and Products of the North Atlantic LCC

AZ-NM TRIBAL PERSPECTIVES OF EXCESS HORSES ON TRIBAL RANGELANDS

OVERMOUNTAIN VICTORY TRAIL BURKE CALDELL CORRIDOR FEASIBLITY STUDY REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS CALDWELL COUNTY PATHWAYS

Call for Artists for: Design and Construction of Environmental Art Activation Story Mill Community Park, Bozeman, MT

Soil Health Practices in the Landscape

Rule D Wetland and Creek Buffers

Arkansas River Corridor

APPENDIX C. Architectural and Environmental Design Standards. Environmentally sensitive areas should be protected.

Riparian Buffer on the Bushkill Creek. Policies

A larger version of this map is located on the last page of this PDF.

Incorporating Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Cultural Information Into Wetland Protection, Management, and Restoration - Tulalip Reservation

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kane County, Illinois

Custom Soil Resource Report for Southampton County, Virginia

Prioritizing Tidal Wetlands: A Landscape Approach

STREAM BUFFERS

Landscape Ecology and Amphibians

Project Summary. Rationale

Dolores River Restoration Partnership. A Collaborative Approach to River Restoration and the Development of a New Generation of Land Stewards

National Association of Conservation Districts. Kris Hoellen Vice President, Sustainable Programs The Conservation Fund September 19, 2013

Arlington, Virginia is a worldclass

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN: PROCESS, PREDILECTIONS, AND PRIORITIES

319 Grant: Baker Creek & Centenary Creek Restoration Initiative

Community Conservation Workshop. Lake Placid

Citywide Integrated Stormwater Management Plan (ISMP) DRAFT ACTION PLAN REVIEW Public Consultation November 16 th, 2016

Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE

INTER-AGENCY COORDINATION MEETING

STORMWATER SITE PLAN INSTRUCTIONS AND SUBMITTAL TEMPLATE Medium and Large Projects

2.4 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Goals, Objectives and Policies

Coffee Creek Park Development Low Impact Development (LID)

Plan Review Checklist

ADDENDUM TO BIOLOGICAL SCOPING SURVEY REPORT, BOTANICAL SURVEY AND WETLAND DELINEATION

Design Around Waterways and Wetlands

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: FINAL PLAN REVIEW- PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP)

Custom Soil Resource Report for Daviess County, Missouri

Rainfall Capture and Green Subdivision Design:

MADRID MINING LANDSCAPE Western Planner/Nevada APA Conference. A New Mexico Abandoned Mine Land (AML) Program Community-Based Planning Project

Draft Stillwater 2030 Comprehensive Plan- Goals and Policies

Custom Soil Resource Report for Pope County, Illinois

50-year Water & Wetland Vision for England WORKSHOP DETAILS

Finger Lakes National Forest. Backbone Horse Camp Water Hydrant Project

I602. Birdwood Precinct

TOWN OF BETHLEHEM OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION PLAN PUBLIC MEETING: OCTOBER 12, 2017

Westmoreland County Greenways Plan

CHECKLIST FOR PHASE II DRAINAGE REPORT

Section 3 Non-Structural BMPs

BURNT BERRY POND COTTAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REGISTRATION

Sacramento River Farmland Anderson, California

SUPPORTING DOCUMENT STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE

TRCA Roles and Responsibilities in Planning and Development

Virginia DCR- Natural Heritage Program. Tools for Linking Conservation and Transportation Planning

Slow it, Spread it, Sink it using Green Stormwater Infrastructure

Transcription:

Rangeland Interagency Ecological Site Manual Dennis W. Thompson p National Range and Grazing Lands Ecologist USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service

Rangeland Interagency Ecological Site Manual (RIESM) Signed by the Chiefs FS, NRCS and Director BLM Final Signature June 14, 2010 Six Sections General Purpose Authorities Objectives Policy Responsibilities

RIESM Sections GENERAL Manual is specific to ecological sites on rangelands Identifies common objective of science based technical process Highlights a common system will be more efficient and defensible Complements existing protocols Identifies that BLM FS and NRCS will seek to expand partnership

RIESM Sections PURPOSE Need for common method to classify land due to intermingling or rangeland resources Complement existing processes Indentifies the need to include other partners, federal state local agencies, organizations, and academia to further develop and implement

RIESM Sections AUTHORITIES Identifies Executive Orders, US Codes and Public Laws support the agencies in this effort. OBJECTIVES To implement a standardized system to define and describe a commonunit for inventory, monitoring, evaluation, and management of rangeland ecosystems. To provide direction for the cooperative development and applicationof of rangeland ecologicalsite descriptions. To improve the ability to manage the landscape in a coordinated manner across ownership boundaries.

RIESM Sections POLICY Cooperatively identify and define rangeland ecological sites for use in the inventory, monitoring, evaluation, and management of the Nation s Nti rangelands. Establish an interagency, interdisciplinary workgroup to recommend, develop, and support policy and procedures to review, approve, and provide quality control and assurance and manage rangeland ecological site description data Establish minimum content requirements for Ecological Site Description:

Ecological Site Description content (1) General Information including ecological site name, ecological site number, and a map identifying approximate geographic extent. (2) Physiographic Features including landform, geology, aspect, elevation, slope, water table, tbl flooding, and ponding. (3) Climatic Features including frost free period (length and dates), freeze free period (length and dates), mean annual precipitation, it ti monthly moisture it and temperature t distribution, and name of approved climate stations. (4) Influencing Water Features existing on the site or adjacent wetland/riparian i ecological lsites that t influence vegetation tti and/or management of the site. Use Cowardin Wetland Classification and/or Rosgen Stream Classification terminology.

Ecological Site Description content (5) Representative Soil Features that differentiate from other ecological sites, affect plant adaptation, establishment, growth, andresponse to disturbance. (i) Use standard terminology and definitions in National Soil Survey Handbook and Soil Survey Manual. (ii) Identify properties that affect plant soil water relationships and hydrology. (6) Ecological Dynamics of the Site including: states, transitions, thresholds, restoration pathways, communityphases phases, community pathways, animal species, wildlife habitat elements, hydrology, and changes to soil properties. (i) Include information related to landscape scale processes: runoff, erosion, fire behavior, wildlife use, etc. (ii) Discussion of temporal scale associated with transitions, community pathways, restoration pathways, and thresholds. Information about response to disturbance or management, probabilities of occurrence can be included d(drought occurrence, fire frequency intervals).

Ecological Site Description content (7) Vegetation (i) Describe the most common, predominant, and/or ecologically significant states and community phases. Include description of transitions, restoration pathways, and community pathways. Include a state tt and transition diagram. (ii) Describe ecologically significant associations of plant species that indicate Important environmental gradients used to differentiate sites, state, or plant community phases. (iii) Use standardized plant names as presented in the NRCS PLANTS database.

Ecological Site Description content (7) Vegetation continued (iv) For the reference state include a narrative description, detailed listing of plant species ( scientific and common name, annual production in pounds air dry weight (ADW) per acre, and either canopy, foliar, or basal cover depending d on life form), total annual production by growth form (median ADW pounds per acre per year in favorable, normal, and unfavorable years), and growth curve (monthly growth by plant species or communities). (v) For all other states/community phases include, at a minimum, m a narrative description. (vi) Productivity of Major Tree Species annual productivity and site index for forested plant communities occurring on rangeland ecological sites, ifapplicable.

Ecological Site Description content (8) Supporting Information (i) Record information about the relationship otherecological ecological sites and documentation and references used. (ii) Identify relationships to other classification systems such as National Vegetation Classification i System (NVCS).

RIESM Sections cont. Responsibilities Leadership provided by Chiefs FS, NRCS and Director BLM FS DeputyChief National Forest System, NRCS Deputy Chief Science and Technology and BLM Assistant Director Renewable Resources and Planning coordinate interagency policy related to Ecological Sites and establish a work group to support ESD development and use. Interagency workgroup develops and recommends policy, procedures and data management for development and use of Ecological Site Descriptions