Draft Environmental Assessment

Similar documents
Open Space and Recreational Resources

Appendix E Section 4(f) Evaluation

I-494 Rehabilitation Project SP (I-394 to Fish Lake Interchange) June 2014 Section 4(f) De Minimis Determination

1. Parks & Recreation Neighborhood Parks Community Parks Special Use Sites 2. Open Space 3. Trails

The Illinois Department of Transportation and Lake County Division of Transportation. Route 173, including the Millburn Bypass

SECTION 4(f) DE MINIMIS DOCUMENTATION

Description of Preferred Alternative

Provide and maintain sufficient public parks, recreation facilities, and open space to meet the recreational needs of County residents and visitors.

Ten Mile Creek Planning Area

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT

Little Neck Planning Area

WARM SPRINGS PARK MASTER PLAN

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

PARKS AND RECREATION

Yadkin River Greenway Feasibility Study Fact Sheet Village of Clemmons, Town of Lewisville, Town of Bermuda Run

Environmental Assessment

Northern Branch Corridor SDEIS March 2017

STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2013, or take other action as deemed appropriate.

DRAFT Amsterdam/Churchill Community Plan (4/17/08) Adopted By the Gallatin County Commission

CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G.1 STAFF REPORT February 21, 2012 BRIGHTON LANDING SPECIFIC PLAN & DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

Throughout. square. (Crystal City Vision Plan 2050)

DRAFT SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION KOLLINER PARK

Parks, Trails, and Open space Element

Master Plan Objectives and Policies

The West Vaughan Employment Area Secondary Plan Policies

SPRINGHILL LAKE TRANSIT VILLAGE

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN:

November 21, Planning Commission Charter Township of Lyon Grand River Ave. New Hudson, MI 48165

Chapter 5: Recreation

Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Draft Vers

Southeast Quadrant Plan

East Panorama Ridge Concept Plan Amendment

DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4

Town of Portola Valley General Plan. Nathhorst Triangle Area Plan

4.8 LAND USE AND PLANNING

Errol Heights Park and Community Garden Frequently Asked Questions March 22, 2018

Charles P. Johnson and Associates. Annapolis Landscape Architects

NOTICE OF PREPARATION

PARTF Scoring System for Grants

2.4 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Goals, Objectives and Policies

Courthouse Planning Area

Project Narrative For Fruita RV Resort Conditional Use Permit

OPEN SPACE CHAPTER 7: OVERVIEW. Preserve open space to protect natural resources, enhance character and provide passive recreation opportunities

Long Branch-Wayne Local Park Renovation Project

North Oakville East Parks Facilities Distribution Plan. November, 2009

City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works

7.0 SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

4.1 LAND USE AND HOUSING

Parks, Trails, and Open Space Element

RECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND GREENWAYS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Montana Rail Link Park

East River Waterfront Esplanade and Piers New York, New York Draft Environmental Impact Statement

A larger version of this map is located on the last page of this PDF.

City of Bonney Lake Allan Yorke Park. MASTER PLAN SUMMARY REPORT June 30, 2016

PARKS. Chapter Introduction

6 July 9, 2014 Public Hearing

G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT. The following summarizes the Recreation and Open Space Element:

7.0 SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION

Danvers High Street I-1 District Study

APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS

PROJECT BACKGROUND. Preliminary Design Scope and Tasks

SOUTHEAST SPORTS COMPLEX MASTER PLAN

2035 General Plan Update and Belmont Village Specific Plan. Joint Study Session with the City Council and Planning Commission April 12, 2016

A. INTRODUCTION. Julie Cowing 5/22/13 11:47 AM Deleted: Considered

APPENDIX J PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR GRAVEL MINE, PIT MINE, OR QUARRY

2. Analysis. DRAFT Gerald Richards & Pleasantview Park Master Plan

SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR EXTENSION. Environmental Evaluation and Basic Engineering Results PUBLIC MEETING/OPEN HOUSE November 18, 2009

Exhibit A. 8:9 Scuffletown Rural Conservation District

Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan

DRAFT SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION INTERSTATE 73 FEIS: I-95 to I-73/I-74 in North Carolina

Environmental Review Part 55 Floodplain Management Subpart C. 8-Step Decision Making Process

City of Sun Prairie Wetland Buffer Reduction Request

The transportation system in a community is an

Hidden Pointe Landscape Master Plan. June, archi terra

CONSERVATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

December 1, 2014 (revised) Preliminary Report -- Thomas Jefferson Site Evaluation

The principal elements of the NTC Strategic Vision plan are as follows.

To qualify for federal Transportation Enhancement (TE) funds a project must meet two basic federal requirements:

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

2.0 Hi s t o r y & Existing Co n d i t i o n s

BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study

D1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

Elm Fork Land Use. Trinity River Corridor Project Committee May 13, 2013

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 16, 2018

APPENDIX E: CITY OF HAMILTON* STANDARD REQUIREMENTS FOR PARK OR OPEN SPACE DEVELOPMENT

3.10 LAND USE SETTING PROJECT SITE EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING. General Plan Land Use Designations.

Neighborhood Districts

CHAPTER 22 Rural Open Space Community Developments

DRAFT. Waterfronts and Open Spaces. 10 The Riverfront Open Space System

City of Redmond. Urban Holding Area Master Planning Requirements and Approval Process

Request Alternative Compliance (Commercial Parking Lot in Restricted Area) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Ashby Moss

Planning for and Managing Open Space and Natural Areas

FY Capital Improvement Program Arroyo Projects

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Tables Table UC Davis Park and Open Space Resources

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY

DRAFT SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION STILLWATER MUNICIPAL BARGE FACILITY

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

The following principles guide the development of goals and strategies to protect and promote these amenities:

BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study

Right-of-Way Acquisitions and Relocations Technical Memorandum

Transcription:

Draft Environmental Assessment CASCADE PARK Orem City, Utah A conversion of land protected under Section 6(f)(3) of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act, Public Law 108-98 September 2017 For information, contact: City of Orem Attn: Ryan Clark, Economic Development Division Manager 56 N. State Street Orem, UT 84057 801-229-7172 rlclark@orem.org Submitted to: Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of State Parks and Recreation Attn: Susan Zarekarizi, Lands/Environmental Coordinator 1594 W. North Temple, Suite 116 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 801-538-7496 susanzarekarizi@utah.gov The Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF), Stateside Assistance Grant Program provides funds to states, and through states to local agencies, for the acquisition and development of outdoor recreation resources. Lands that have received funding through LWCF are protected by Section 6(f)(3) of the Act unless a conversion is approved by the Secretary of the Interior as delegated to the National Park Service.

Table of Contents Chapter 1: Purpose, Need & Background... 1 1.1 Summary and Purpose... 1 1.2 Need and Background... 1 Chapter 2: Description of Alternatives... 3 2.1 Alternatives Considered... 3 Chapter 3: Affected Environment & Environmental Consequences... 7 3.1 Cascade Park and the Converted Park Parcel... 7 3.2 Proposed Replacement Park Parcel: The Proposed 800 North Pocket Park... 8 3.3 Environmental Resources... 9 3.4 Mandatory Criteria... 13 Chapter 4: Coordination & Consultation... 14 4.1 Agency Coordination... 14 4.2 Public Involvement... 14 4.3 List of Preparers... 14 List of Figures Figure 1. Proximity of LWCF Conversion and Replacement Properties... 2 Figure 2. Replacement Alternative 1... 4 Figure 3. Replacement Alternative 2... 4 Figure 4. Proposed Action Preferred Alternative... 6 Figure 5. Cascade Park and Conversion Area... 8 Figure 6. Preliminary Concepts for Replacement Parcel... 9 Appendix A Location Area Map Table of Contents i

Chapter 1: Purpose, Need & Background The City of Orem (the City) proposes to remove federal protection from 0.06 acres of the 6.29-acre Cascade Park, an existing Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) parcel, and replace it with a parcel of City-owned land to be developed as the proposed 800 North Pocket Park, located approximately 1 mile northeast of Cascade Park. 1.1 Summary and Purpose The purpose of this project is to obtain approval for the conversion of land from the existing LWCF Cascade Park for a cell tower site that was leased on a 2,500-square-foot portion of the park. This Environmental Assessment has been prepared consistent with LWCF state assistance proposals submitted for National Park Service (NPS) review and decision, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act and its implementing regulations, in coordination with the Utah Department of Natural Resources Division of State Parks and Recreation, and in compliance with the 2014 Utah State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan. This Environmental Assessment evaluates the environmental consequences of the Proposed Action on the human and natural environment and allows the affected public to understand the context for the Proposed Action. Alternatives considered in this Environmental Assessment include the No-Action Alternative, Replacement Alternative 1, Replacement Alternative 2, and the Proposed Action, which is the preferred alternative that would replace the converted parcel with a new proposed park parcel. Chapter 3 of this Environmental Assessment discusses in detail the potential environmental resources that may be affected by the Proposed Action, as indicated by the Environmental Screening Form prepared in the spring of 2017. 1.2 Need and Background The City of Orem converted lands purchased with federal funds from the LWCF program to non- LWCF uses within Cascade Park, but did not complete the required Environmental Assessment prior to doing so. The City has evaluated several options as potential replacement parcels and has identified a preferred replacement parcel to mitigate the loss of the original LWCF lands converted to non-lwcf uses. Under the jurisdiction of the Utah Department of Natural Resources Division of State Parks, which administers the LWCF in Utah, the City is now completing the required assessment. Chapter 1: Purpose, Need & Background 1

The City of Orem received funding from the LWCF program to develop public recreational facilities within its jurisdiction, including funds to develop Cascade Park, located at approximately 950 East 200 North in Orem, Utah County, Utah. Initial funds for Cascade Park were received in 1970 and went toward 50 percent of the land purchase cost (project number 49-00080). Additional funds were received in 1983 and went toward 50 percent of the park construction cost (project number 49-00310). The developed land thereafter became subject to the regulations of the LWCF, often referred to as Section 6(f). In 2000, the City converted lands within Cascade Park from approved LWCF uses to non-lwcf uses. Such a conversion requires replacement of the converted resource lands with land of equal value/size that will be made available for approved LWCF uses. Both the converted and replacement lands must be assessed for potential impacts to environmental resources prior to the conversion. However, the City did not complete the required Environmental Assessment prior to the conversion and is now, retroactively, completing the assessment. Figure 1 shows the general locations and proximity of the converted lands (i.e., the existing Section 6(f) lands) and the proposed replacement parcel. Figure 1. Proximity of LWCF Conversion and Replacement Properties Image Source: Google Maps Chapter 1: Purpose, Need & Background 2

Chapter 2: Description of Alternatives This chapter describes the alternatives that were developed and evaluated for the Cascade Park LWCF conversion site including the No-Action Alternative, Replacement Alternative 1, Replacement Alternative 2, and the Proposed Action, which is the preferred replacement alternative. The converted parcel is located in the developed area of Cascade Park, which has been developed with lawn grasses, ornamental landscaping, and recreational facilities. The parcel was leased to a cell tower facility, which now occupies a roughly 2,500-square-foot (0.06-acre) leased area. The remaining 6.24 acres and all of the distinctive features of the park have and will remain untouched and maintain their original function for recreation. 2.1 Alternatives Considered No-Action Alternative The No-Action Alternative is defined as the City of Orem not complying with the LWCF land conversion process and associated regulations by not replacing the loss of converted LWCF land. Under the No-Action Alternative, the City would remain in non-compliance with LWCF land procedures and federal requirements. The No-Action Alternative has been retained for consideration only as a baseline to compare the Proposed Action and any associated impacts resulting from the Proposed Action. Replacement Alternative 1 (Zip Code: 84097-4946) A parcel of land adjacent to the southeast corner of Cascade Park was identified by the City for consideration as a possible replacement for the loss of the converted Cascade Park parcel (see Figure 2). The City explored options to pursue the site, but eliminated it from further consideration due to difficulties in purchasing the land the site would require acquisition of a subdivided portion of an existing residential home parcel. In addition, it was determined that a different location would provide a greater benefit to the community. This location would have provided an additional narrow strip of grass to the existing park; whereas, the preferred alternative location would create new, additional outdoor recreation space. Chapter 2: Description of Alternatives 3

Figure 2. Replacement Alternative 1 Replacement Alternative 2 (Zip Code: 84058-7338) A parcel of land located at approximately 360 West and 1400 South was also considered as a possible replacement to the converted Cascade Park parcel (see Figure 3). The City evaluated options to develop the property for park use, but eliminated the property from further consideration due to slope, utility and access challenges. Figure 3. Replacement Alternative 2 Chapter 2: Description of Alternatives 4

Proposed Action Preferred Alternative (Zip Code: 84097-4387) The proposed replacement parcel is a roughly triangular piece of vacant land that is 2,466 square feet in size and is owned by Orem City. The parcel is located on the northwest corner of 800 North and 1100 East in Orem, Utah (see Figures 1 and 4). The southern tip of the triangle was not included in the replacement parcel due to existing utility infrastructure that contains above- and below-ground facilities. The parcel was purchased during the right-of-way acquisition process for an infrastructure improvement project for 800 North Street. The parcel is a remainder piece that is left over from the project. These types of parcels are typically sold to the public as a surplus property. Due to the unique shape of the parcel, it cannot be developed commercially, and the City has retained ownership. The parcel is proposed to be developed as the 800 North Pocket Park, which would be owned and managed by Orem City. The City has developed several preliminary conceptual designs for the proposed replacement park that include such amenities as landscaped areas, grass, trees, site furnishings, sidewalk, bike racks and repair stations, moveable planters, and utility box wraps displaying local art. The parcel is situated directly east and at the southern terminus of the paved 17-mile regional Murdock Canal Trail, and directly north of the paved 800 North Trail. The 800 North Trail serves as a connection between the southern terminus of the Murdock Canal Trail and the Provo River Connector Trail located to the east at the mouth of Provo Canyon. The 800 North Trail also extends west into the heart of Orem. The adjoining trails are not included in the proposed replacement parcel. Under the current situation, the Murdock Canal Trail is located on right-of-way owned by Provo River Water Users and contains a piped canal buried beneath the trail. Utah County owns and maintains the trail by way of an agreement and easement. Additionally, the 800 North Trail essentially functions as a sidewalk for the adjoining 800 North Street and is located on right-ofway owned by the Utah Department of Transportation. The proposed 800 North Pocket Park would provide a new outdoor recreation area to serve the residents of and visitors to Orem City, which has a population of approximately 93,000 (2013), residents in the adjoining neighborhoods, and users of the nearby and adjoining trail facilities. Access to the pocket park would be easily accommodated by personal vehicles, as well as the nearby and adjoining bike/pedestrian facilities. As the parcel is currently undeveloped and covered with gravel, development of the proposed 800 North Pocket Park would provide substantial aesthetic benefit and additional outdoor space for Orem City residents, the surrounding neighborhoods, and regional trail users to enjoy. The proposed 800 North Pocket Park falls within the Mountainland Planning District for the 2014 Utah State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP). Over half of the Mountainland Planning District residents surveyed for the SCORP identified outdoor recreation as extremely important, Chapter 2: Description of Alternatives 5

with city parks ranked as the most important recreational facilities. Residents and municipalities identified trails, trail improvements, and parks as needed recreational facilities and priorities. The addition of the new 800 North Pocket Park supports the overall desire of the community for recreational opportunities, but more specifically meets the needs and priorities of new/improved parks and trails identified in the SCORP. It is anticipated that the conversion proposal will be approved in 2017, and the replacement parcel improvements will be completed and available for public use in the fall of 2018. Figure 4. Proposed Action Preferred Alternative Chapter 2: Description of Alternatives 6

Chapter 3: Affected Environment & Environmental Consequences This chapter describes the existing converted park parcel, the proposed replacement park parcel, the existing natural and human environmental resources that make up the affected environment, and any potential environmental impacts for each of these identified parcels. In general, the survey area for each resource is the LWCF boundary of Cascade Park, including the converted park parcel, and the proposed replacement park parcel boundary. Each affected environmental resource was evaluated to determine direct and indirect impacts resulting from the conversion of the Cascade Park parcel and the development of the proposed replacement park parcel. 3.1 Cascade Park and the Converted Park Parcel The converted parcel of land from Cascade Park is 2,500 square feet in size (approximately 0.06 acres); Cascade Park in its entirety is 6.29 acres. Overall, Cascade Park is developed with lawn grass and ornamental landscaping, and caters to various sport opportunities accommodated by a basketball court, soccer fields, a baseball diamond, a volleyball sandpit and two lighted tennis courts. There is a 1 / 3 -mile paved walking path, two picnic pavilions and public restrooms. The park serves the residents of and visitors to Orem City, which has a population of approximately 93,000 (2013), primarily for planned park sport events or activities. Access to the park is easily accommodated by personal vehicles in the designated parking areas. There is a school in close proximity and singlefamily residential homes with access directly to the park with and without a vehicle. The existing converted park parcel located in the developed area of Cascade Park has been leased by Orem City for a cell tower facility. The converted park parcel consists of a cell tower site located at the western edge of the park boundary near the lighted tennis courts and basketball court (see Figure 5). All distinctive features of Cascade Park have and will remain untouched and maintain their function as a recreational destination for Orem City. The converted park parcel resulted in a minor impact of removing 2,500 square feet of the overall park s lawn grass. No amenities were disturbed through the conversion of the 2,500-square-foot parcel, and the addition of the cell tower does not take away from the recreational value or already developed nature of Cascade Park. Figure 5 depicts the total Cascade Park Section 6(f) property and the portion of the park that has been converted to non-lwcf use. Chapter 3: Affected Environment & Environmental Consequences 7

Figure 5. Cascade Park and Conversion Area 3.2 Proposed Replacement Park Parcel: The Proposed 800 North Pocket Park The proposed replacement parcel is a roughly triangular piece of vacant land that is 2,466 square feet in size and is owned by Orem City. The parcel is located on the northwest corner of 800 North and 1100 East in Orem City, Utah, as depicted on Figures 1 and 4. The parcel is currently undeveloped, graded and covered with gravel. The parcel is proposed to be developed as the 800 North Pocket Park. Orem City has developed several preliminary conceptual designs for the Replacement Parcel at 800 North 1100 East proposed replacement park that include such amenities as landscaped areas, grass, trees, site furnishings, sidewalk, bike racks and repair stations, moveable planters, and utility box wraps displaying local art. These conceptual options are shown in Figure 6. The parcel is situated directly east and at the southern terminus of the paved 17-mile regional Murdock Canal Trail, and directly north of the paved 800 North Trail. The 800 North Trail serves as a connection between the southern terminus of the Murdock Canal Trail and the Provo River Connector Trail located to the east at the mouth of Provo Canyon. The 800 North Trail also extends west into the heart of Orem. Chapter 3: Affected Environment & Environmental Consequences 8

There is no negative impact to the conversion of this vacant parcel into the proposed 800 North Pocket Park. As the parcel is currently undeveloped and covered with gravel, development of the proposed 800 North Pocket Park would provide substantial aesthetic benefit and additional outdoor space for Orem City residents, the surrounding neighborhoods, and regional trail users to enjoy. Figure 6. Preliminary Concepts for Replacement Parcel Source: Landmark Design 3.3 Environmental Resources Both the conversion parcel (Cascade Park) and the proposed 800 North replacement parcel were analyzed for the presence of and any potential impacts to environmental resources. Table 1 provides a summary of potential impacts; additional resource information is described below. Table 1. Environmental Resource Summary Resource Conversion Parcel (Cascade Park) Proposed Replacement Parcel Geological Resources No impact; not present No impact; not present Air Quality Located in non-attainment area (Utah County) for PM 10 and PM 2.5 No impact Located in non-attainment area (Utah County) for PM 10 and PM 2.5 No impact Noise No impact No permanent impact; temporary minor noise increases during construction Water Quality No impact No impact Water Resources No impact; not present No impact; not present Land Use No impact; consistent with City plans No impact; consistent with City plans Circulation, Transportation and Accessibility No impact No change in circulation, transportation, or accessibility; access to proposed park for vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians from nearby/adjacent roads and bike/pedestrian facilities Species of Concern No impact; not present No impact; not present Recreation See discussion below; no impact to recreational features or functions of remaining 6.24 acres of park See discussion below; addition of new park to provide additional outdoor recreational space/opportunities for Orem residents and visitors Chapter 3: Affected Environment & Environmental Consequences 9

Table 1. Environmental Resource Summary Resource Conversion Parcel (Cascade Park) Proposed Replacement Parcel Historic/Archaeological No impact; not present No impact; not present Resources Socio-economic and Environmental Justice No concentrations of racial or ethnic minority populations or persons living at or below poverty levels within or near the area No substantial adverse or disproportionate impacts to these or environmental justice populations No concentrations of racial or ethnic minority populations or persons living at or below poverty levels within or near the area No substantial adverse or disproportionate impacts to these or environmental justice populations Hazardous Materials No impact; not present No impact; not present Geological Resources There are no unique or distinguishable geological resources, minerals, forms, soils or streambeds on either the converted park parcel or the proposed replacement parcel. Air Quality Orem City resides in Utah County, Utah. Utah County is in non-attainment for particulate matter (PM) 10 and PM 2.5. There is no impact to air quality resulting from the converted park parcel or the proposed replacement park parcel. Noise Cascade Park is known for team sports. There is often activity and associated noise from visitors to the park daily and especially on weekends. The proposed park parcel is currently situated along 800 North, a five-lane major arterial roadway. Most noise at the proposed site is consistent with the developed area where it is currently located. No noise impact will result to visitors to Cascade Park or to adjacent residential homes from the converted cell tower facility. No permanent noise impact will result from the proposed 800 North Pocket Park. Temporary minor increases in noise would occur during the construction of the proposed 800 North Pocket Park. Noise increases would be infrequent and isolated to primarily construction vehicles when dropping off landscaping materials. Construction of the proposed park would take place during daytime hours; no construction would take place at night. Chapter 3: Affected Environment & Environmental Consequences 10

Water Quality / Quantity The existing converted park parcel is lawn grass with development where the cell tower pad and utilities are located. Lawn grass surrounds the converted parcel. The proposed replacement parcel is currently undeveloped, graded gravel with no vegetation. Water runoff, quality and quantity from the proposed 800 North Pocket Park would be negligible with the implementation of the proposed park, including vegetation and minor hardscape aesthetic features. There is no impact to water quality or water quantity resulting from the converted park parcel or the proposed replacement park parcel. Water Resources (Water Bodies, Streams, Floodplains / Wetlands, Marine / Estuarine) There are no water resources on or near the converted park parcel or the proposed replacement park parcel. Because there are no water resources identified on either parcel, there will be no impact to such resources. Land Use Orem City s current land use plans for the existing converted park parcel and adjacent properties consist of parkland, residential and school property uses. Orem City s current land use plan for the proposed park parcel and adjacent land is residential use. The conversion of the park parcel and the use of the proposed replacement park parcel are consistent with current City land use plans. There would be no impact to land use resulting from the converted park parcel or the proposed replacement parcel. Circulation, Transportation and Accessibility Primary access to Cascade Park is provided via 200 North, which also provides access to the park s parking lot along the north side of the property. A paved walkway follows the perimeter of the park and crosses through the park s lawn grass in multiple locations, providing paved access to the park s recreational amenities. Conversion of the 2,500-square-foot parcel does not affect the circulation of accessibility of the site. Access to the proposed replacement park parcel is available from both 1100 East and 800 North. The Murdock Canal Trail, Provo River Connector Trail and 800 North Trail provide additional access for bicyclists and pedestrians. No impacts to circulation or accessibility will result from implementation of the Proposed Action. Chapter 3: Affected Environment & Environmental Consequences 11

Plant / Animal / Fish Species or Habitat of Special Concern, Protection or Importance There are no state or federal species or habitat of importance or special concern at the converted park parcel or the proposed replacement park parcel. During construction of the proposed replacement park, the following best management practices will be implemented to prohibit the introduction of noxious weeds and/or invasive species: Disturbed areas will be revegetated when appropriate after construction with non-invasive plants and/or certified weed-free seed. Fill materials will be free of waste, pollutants and noxious weeds. Recreation Recreational use and facilities of the converted park parcel, and Cascade Park as a whole, are described above in Section 3.1. No amenities were disturbed through the conversion of the 2,500- square-foot parcel, and the addition of the cell tower does not take away from the recreational value of Cascade Park. The potential for recreational use of the proposed replacement park is detailed above in Section 2.1 (Preferred Alternative discussion) and Section 3.2. Historic / Archaeological Resources No cultural resources are present at Cascade Park including the converted park parcel. No cultural resources are present at the proposed replacement park. The Cultural Resource Assessment for the Cascade Park 6(f) Conversion report, dated March 27, 2017, will be provided to the Utah State Historic Preservation Officer for review and concurrence of the finding of no historic properties affected. Socio-Economic and Environmental Justice Populations There are no concentrations of racial or ethnic minority populations or persons living at or below poverty levels within or near the area of the converted park parcel and the proposed replacement park parcel. Both the conversion of the Cascade Park parcel and the proposed replacement parcel would not cause substantial adverse impacts on community social conditions and/or environmental justice populations. Impacts such as noise during construction would be comparable for all residents in the vicinity of the converted parcel or the proposed replacement parcel. No environmental justice populations have been identified that would disproportionately bear impacts of the converted park parcel or replacement park parcel. Chapter 3: Affected Environment & Environmental Consequences 12

Hazardous Materials There are no generators and facilities that use hazardous waste, accidental releases of hazardous waste, sites contaminated with hazardous waste, or sites that have the potential for contamination in the converted park parcel area or the proposed replacement park parcel area. 3.4 Mandatory Criteria The proposed alternative would not affect any of the mandatory criteria as listed on the NPS Environmental Screening Form. Chapter 3: Affected Environment & Environmental Consequences 13

Chapter 4: Coordination & Consultation 4.1 Agency Coordination Federal, state, and local agency database searches and literature from the following sources were assessed to determine the current affected environment and indirect and direct impacts: Orem City Utah Division of State History Utah Department of Air Quality Utah Geological Survey Utah Department of Environmental Quality Utah State Historic Preservation Office U.S. Census, American Community Survey Data 4.2 Public Involvement The Draft Environmental Assessment will be released for a 30-day public comment period on the Orem City website at www.orem.org. A public hearing was held on April 25, 2017, at 6:00 p.m. at the Orem City Center to provide the opportunity for public input on the proposed Cascade Park LWCF conversion. Public notices were provided on the Orem City website, the State of Utah website announcing city council actions and public hearings, and at the Orem City Center (56 N. State Street, Orem, Utah). At the hearing, a presentation was given about the conversion and proposed replacement sites, the LWCF land conversion and Environmental Assessment processes, and contact information for providing comments. Members of the public were given an opportunity to provide comments; no public comments were provided at the hearing. Members of the city council voiced support for the conversion, and indicated that the additional outdoor recreation space provided by the proposed replacement parcel would be a positive addition to the community. 4.3 List of Preparers This Environmental Assessment was prepared by the following individuals: Ryan Clark, Economic Development Division Manager, Orem City Angie Fellows, Planner, Jacobs Loretta Markham, Project Manager, Jacobs Sheri Ellis, Cultural Resource Specialist, Certus Environmental Solutions Chapter 4: Comments & Consultation 14

Appendix A: Location Area Map Appendix A: Location Area Map 15

Appendix A: Location Area Map 16