Recei ORDINANCE NO. at PC H aring ~~ t ~'jti~ FILE NO.

Similar documents
AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE 1/23/03. [Ordinance to Designate the Old U.S. Mint At 88 Fifth Street As a Landmark Under Planning Code Article 10.

BACKGROUND PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Memo

AMENDED IN BOARD 07/26/16 ORDINANCE NO [Fire, Housing, Building Codes - Fire Safety Requirements for Existing Buildings]

AGENDA REPORT. William ft Crouch, AlA, NCARB, AICP, LEED (AP), Urban Designer

Single Room Occupancy Hotel Safety & Stabilization Task Force

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

HAHN BUILDING 140 N.E. 1 ST AVENUE

Part 3 TYPE: BUNGALOW. 1910s 1930s

A1.01. Project Description:

SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')

ITEM 7-A. CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum. Honorable President and Members of the Planning Board. Supervising Planner. Date: August 26, 2013

Resolution : Exhibit A. Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003

Agenda Report DESIGNATION OF 1855 E. COLORADO BOULEVARD (FORMER DRAPER'S BUILDING) AS A LANDMARK

Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement Queen's Park

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Architectural Inventory Form

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Design Review Commission Report

PC RESOLUTION NO ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC)

National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form

Architectural Inventory Form (page 1 of 5)

CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G. 1 STAFF REPORT August 4, Staff Contact: Tricia Shortridge (707)

Contact: Teresa Haenggi, Associate Planner, (916) ; Roberta Deering, LEED AP, Preservation Director (916)

Ordinance amending the Building, Housing, Fire, and Administrative Codes to

1755 Le Roy Avenue (Tellefson Hall)

Morgan s Subdivision Historic District Character-defining Features

14825 Fruitvale Ave.

Architectural Inventory Form (page 1 of 5)

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Atkins Hall (Building 31)

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 15, 2012

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

Architectural Inventory Form

Standards Compliance Review 303 Baldwin Avenue, San Mateo, California

Historic Preservation Commission Motion No. 0101

Regulations, of the Dallas City Code by creating a new Division S-105; establishing use

Architectural Inventory Form

Architectural Inventory Form

Historic Preservation Commission Motion No. 0171

Ottawa Historic Resources Inventory: Commercial Historic District Building Information. Significance and Potential Eligibility

APPENDIX G. Shadow Memo

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

Butler Junior High School

ORDINANCE NO. SECTION 1. This ordinance, due to its length and corresponding cost of

HOUSE & SHUTTER PAIRING GUIDE

ORDINANCE NO. 430 REGARDING WATER CONSERVATION

RECOMMENDATION REPORT

TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: SEPTEMBER 17,2007

CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM

CITY HISTORIC ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT - CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION

CHAPTER 6 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR INDIVIDUAL BUILDING ELEMENTS. Commercial Facades

Draft Planning Commission Resolution Proposed Commission Policy and Planning Code Amendment

The Cathedral is a: place to worship God place to feel God beautiful awful inspiring place that is way better than the church in your town place that

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet. Related District Number.

Attachment 1 December 4, 2012

DRAFT APPENDIX C. COMMON RESIDENTIAL STYLES IN THE SNOHOMISH HISTORIC DISTRICT Era of construction and architectural characteristics

Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report HEARING DATE: MARCH 20, 2019

Lenoir Downtown National Register Historic District Christmas Ornament Series

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF OAKVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER

C LASSIC M OULDINGS I NC. brackets sconces chair rails. casings overdoors

CHURCH OF THE HOLY CROSS Stateburg, SC

PC RESOLUTION NO GRADING PLAN MODIFICATION (GPM)

WHEREAS, a number of these buildings are potentially historic structures;

CITY OF LOMPOC PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Public Hearing September 20, 2011 City Council Chambers, 3 rd Floor, City Hall, 1737 Main Street Columbia, South Carolina

M E M O R A N D U M CITY PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA

6 November 13, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT: CAH HOLDINGS, LLC

2006 Design & Manufacturing Excellence Award. Winners

IMPORTANT NOTICE. Architectural Inventory Form COLORADO CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY I. IDENTIFICATION th Street 5WL.5601

2.1.8 Cultural Resources Regulatory Setting. Affected Environment, Environmental

August 1, 2018 beginning at 12:30 p.m. in Room 400 of City Hall

West Virginia Historic Preservation Office

Historic Preservation Commission Motion No Certificate of Appropriateness

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

Baker Historic District

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

CITY OF SAN MATEO ORDINANCE NO

Addendum to Environmental Impact Report

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING ON MONDAY AUGUST 28, 2017 JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

ORIGINAL RENDERING 1814 FRANKLIN STREET OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 80 S MODIFICATIONS PROPOSED ELEVATION COVER THE LEAMINGTON architecture & interiors experi

Designation Information

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Conduct Public Hearing to vacate certain public right of way adjacent to Sycamore Avenue and San Pablo Avenue

sacred spaces Religious architecture that unites both spiritual and structural integrity

TriniTy s 250 th Anniversary Altar & Nave Renovation Project. Sunday, November 5, 2017

2154 Dundas Street West Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act

Glossary of Terms Select one word from the glossary above and write it beside its definition in the chart below.

Cathedrals. Cathedrals means chair and was the seat of the local bishop Cathedrals were built to take the worshipper to heaven.

INTRODUCTION. 1.1 What is a General Plan? 1.2 Requirements for a General Plan. 1.3 Introduction to Monterey County

Memo. B R A Y H e r i t a g e

Architectural Inventory Form

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 23, 2019

Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Roncesvalles Avenue

ORDINANCE NO. _ THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Building and Site Design Standards

RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Historic Preservation DESIGN GUIDELINES

The NWX American Foursquare

Historical Evaluation Congregational Church, 225 Tilton Avenue City of San Mateo November 15, 2011

Transcription:

FILE NO. Recei ORDINANCE NO. at PC H aring ~~ t,~( i ~'jti~ 0 0 [Planning Code -Amending Landmark Designation of 0 Broadway (Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church)] Ordinance amending the Landmark Designation for Landmark IVo. 0, 0 Broadway (Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church), Assessor's Block No. 0, Lot No. 00, under Article 0 of the Planning Code, to confirm the exterior features that should be preserved or replaced in kind, and to add interior features to the designation; affirming the Planning Department's determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 0, and findings of consistency with the General Plan and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 0.. NOTE: Unchanged Code text and uncodified text are in plain Arial font. Additions to Codes are in single-underline italics Times New Roman font. Deletions to Codes are in ~ Board amendment additions are in double-underlined Arial font. Board amendment deletions are in Asterisks (* *) indicate the omission of unchanged Code subsections or parts of tables. Be it ordained by the People of the City and County of San Francisco: Section. Findings. {a) CEQA and Land Use Findings. () The Planning Department has determined that the Planning Code amendment proposed in this ordinance is subject to a Categorical Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code Sections 000 et seq., "CEQA") pursuant to Section 0 of California Code of Regulations, Title, Sections 000 et seq., the Guidelines for implementation of CEQA for actions by regulatory agencies for protection of the environment (in this case, landmark designation). Said determination is BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page

on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors in File No. and is 0 0 ~z~ incorporated herein by reference. The Board of Supervisors affirms this determination. () Pursuant to Planning Code Section 0, the Board of Supervisors finds that the proposed amendment to the landmark designation of 0 Broadway, Assessor's Block No. 0, Lot No. 00 ("Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church" or "0 Broadway"), will serve the public necessity, convenience, and welfare for the reasons set forth in Resolution No., recommending approval of the proposed designation, which is incorporated herein by reference. () The Board of Supervisors finds that the proposed amendment to the landmark designation of Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church is consistent with the General Plan and with Planning Code Section 0.(b) for the reasons set forth in Resolution No. (b) General Findings. () Pursuant to Charter Section., the has authority "to recommend approval, disapproval, or modification of landmark designations and historic district designations under the Planning Code to the Board of Supervisors." () Ordinance No. -, enacted in, designated 0 Broadway, the site of Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church, as Landmark No. 0. That ordinance, which is incorporated herein by reference, required that the particular features to be preserved include those "described in the Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board's Case Report, in Section A, entitled `Architecture,' Subsection No., `Design' and in Section D, `Integrity,' Subsection fro. `Alterations'," but it did not list those features in any detail. Moreover, those features refer only to the building's exterior. The ordinance did not BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page

0 include any of the building's interior character-defining features as part of the Landmark designation. () On August, 0, the added the interior of Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church to the Landmark Designation Work Program, a list of individual properties and historic districts under consideration for landmark designation, adopted by the at its June, 0 meeting. () The amended Landmark Designation Report prepared for this landmarking amendment was authored by Planning Department Preservation staff. All preparers meet the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for historic preservation program staff, as set forth in Code of Federal Regulations Title, Part, Appendix A. Planning Department staff also reviewed the report for accuracy and conformance with the purposes and standards of Article 0 of the Planning Code. () The, at its regular meeting of, reviewed Planning Department staff's analysis of the historical significance of Iglesia de N uestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church, as well as both the exterior and interior features of the church, pursuant to Article 0 of the Planning Code as part of the Landmark Designation Case Report dated () On, the adopted Resolution 0 No., initiating an amendment of the Landmark Designation of Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church pursuant to Section 00. of the Planning Code. Said resolution is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors in File No. and is incorporated herein by reference. () On after holding a public hearing on the proposed designation amendment and having considered both the specialized analyses prepared by BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page

Planning Department staff and the amended Landmark Designation Report, the Historic Preservation Commission recommended approval of the proposed amendment to the Landmark Designation of Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church by Resolution No., to list the exterior and interior features that should be 0 preserved or replaced in kind. Said resolution is on file with the Clerk of the Board in File No. and is incorporated herein by reference. () The Board of Supervisors hereby finds that Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church has a special character and special historical, architectural, and aesthetic interest and value, and that expanding its designation as a Landmark to include interior features will further the purposes of and conform to the standards set forth in Article 0 of the Planning Code. In doing so, the Board hereby incorporates by reference the findings of the amended Landmark Designation Report. Section. Designation. Pursuant to Section 00 of the Planning Code, the Landmark Designation for 0 Broadway (Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church), Assessor's Block No. 0, Lot No. 00, is hereby amended as specified in Section of this ordinance. Appendix A to Article 0 of the Planning Code is hereby amended with respect to Landmark No. 0. 0 Section. Required Data. (a) The description, location, and boundary of the Landmark site consists of the City parcel located at 0 Broadway (Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church), Assessor's Block No. 0, Lot No. 00, in San Francisco's North Beach neighborhood. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page

0 0 (b) The characteristics of the Landmark that justify its designation are described and shown in the Landmark Designation Report and other supporting materials contained in Planning Department Case Docket No. 0-00DES. In summary, Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church, both the exterior and interior, is eligible for local designation as it is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history, embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, and is the work of a master. Specifically, Iglesia de N uestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church is associated with the development of San Francisco's Latino and Spanish-speaking communities from the latenineteenth to the mid-twentieth century, as both the geographical and spiritual heart of the Latino and Spanish-speaking enclave that existed in North Beach until the 0s. Designation of Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church is also appropriate given that it is one of the first churches in the country to be constructed of reinforced concrete, considered an innovative construction technology at that time, and is an exceptional example of an early twentieth century Mission Revival church with a highly ornate interior displaying Renaissance and Baroque ornamentation. Furthermore, Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church is the work of master architects Shea & Lofquist and its interior murals are the work of master artist Luigi Brusatori. (c) The particular features that shall be preserved, or replaced in-kind as determined necessary, are those generally shown in photographs and described in the Landmark Designation Report, which can be found in Planning Department Docket No. 0-00DES, and which are incorporated in this designation by reference as though fully set forkh herein. Specifically, the following features shall be preserved or replaced in-kind: () The overall form, structure, height, massing, materials, and architectural ornamentation of the church's exterior identified as: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page

~ ~ 0 0 (A) Two-story height; (B) Cruciform floor plan; (C) Reinforced concrete construction; (D) Twin towers topped with weathered copper crosses; (E) Rectangular central main entry, topped with "Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe" engraving; (F) Mosaic figure of Our Lady of Guadalupe within a round opening bordered by ornamental stucco detailing, topped with Dove of Peace mosaic, located above the central main entry; (G) Arched niches containing sculpted figures, flanking Our Lady of Guadalupe mosaic; (H} Arched secondary entries to the west and east of the central entry; (I) Projecting one-story bay of east entry; (J) Rusticated stucco base containing recessed, arched basement entry; (K) Stucco cladding; (L) Round arches; and (M) Stone steps approaching primary facade entrances. () The overall form, structure, height, massing, materials, and architectural ornamentation of the church's interior identified as: (A) Two-story volume; (B) Cruciform floor plan; (C) Nave with lower aisle wings and an apse and two side altars at the north end of building; (D) Five-bay side aisle arches; (E) All ceiling form and features, including but not limited to: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page

(i) Arched barrel vault nave ceiling; (ii) Arched side aisle vault ceilings; viii) Dentil molding and simple cornice dividing upper and lower ~ nave levels; [:~ 0 0 ~~ (iv) Beaded molding at the side aisle arches and apse; {v) Decorative ribbing at the barrel vault nave ceiling; (F) Corinthian columns supporting the side aisle arches, painted with a faux-marble finish and bound with amid-column decorative cartouche belt; (G) Cross-vaulted side aisle ceilings visually delineated by wood moldings, each bay containing four separate cartouche motifs and a painted "x" highlighting the cross-vault; (H) The two northmost side aisle ceilings with features as described above and including cherub murals and round stained-glass laylights; (I) Corinthian pilasters at the side aisle walls, aligned with the Corinthian columns and painted with afaux-marble finish; (J) Engaged Corinthian columns circling the apse, painted with a fauxmarble finish and bound with amid-column decorative cartouche belt; (K) All murals on walls and ceiling painted in a Classical style by Luigi Brusatori, including but not limited to: (i) Fresco of the Holy Sacrament and the Coronation of the Blessed Virgin at the nave ceiling; (ii) Fresco depicting the Last Supper and the Multiplication of the Loaves and Fishes at the apse; (iii) Side aisle banners featuring Latin script; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page

0 0 ~~ (iv) Slightly projecting portrait medallions at the first-story nave arch junctions and organ loft balcony; (v) Flush portrait medallions above the narthex; (vi) Crest medallions above the clerestory windows; (vii) Border frieze dividing upper and lower nave levels containing dentil molding, ovular forms, and painted cherub/floral motifs; (viii) Painted statuary figures flanking clerestory windows; (ix) Painted figures at the east and west walls of organ loft, within painted rope-coil frames; (L) Arched stained-glass aisle windows portraying the miracle at Guadalupe, the Sermon on the Mount, and other passages of the Bible; (M) Shallow arched stained-glass clerestory windows portraying saints set within wood frames and topped with decorative, circular grilles; (N) Amber glass windows throughout the building; (0) Wood parquet flooring located at former pew seating areas; (P) Tile flooring located at center aisle and remaining areas; (Q) Central entry hall cross-vaulted painted ceiling; (R) All interior millwork and molding, such as window surrounds, painted wood panels under molded wall sill, wood stair balustrade and newel posts; (S) Southeast entry room containing an arched stained-glass window and an arched multi-lite amber art-glass window, each flanked by blind niches; (T) Double-height arched pediment wood door surround and wood confessional vestibules at the south portion of the nave against the north-facing narthex wall; {U) Organ loft at south portion of nave; and (V) -set pipe mechanical Hook and Hastings organ. BQARD OF SUPERVISORS Page

Section. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective 0 days after enactment. Enactment occurs when the Mayor signs the ordinance, the Mayor returns the ordinance unsigned or does not sign the ordinance within ten days of receiving it, or the Board of Supervisors overrides the Mayor's veto of the ordinance. APPROVED AS TO FORM: DEN~IIS J. HERRERA, City Attorney By: A DREA RU - Deputy City tt QUIDE ney 0 n:llega na\as0\000\00.docx 0 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page

ORDINANCE NO. 0 0 [Planning Code -Amending Landmark Designation of 0 Broadway (Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church)] Ordinance amending the Landmark Designation for Landmark No. 0, 0 Broadway (Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church), Assessor's Block No. 0, Lot No. 00, under Article 0 of the Planning Code, to confirm the exterior features that should be preserved or replaced in kind, and to add interior features to the designation; affirming the Planning Department's determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 0, and findings of consistency with the General Plan and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 0.. NOTE: Unchanged Code text and uncodified text are in plain Arial font. Additions to Codes are in single-irnder lirae it~rlics Times Neti~~ Roman font. Deletions to Codes are in r*,.;' n,~,. ~ ;*-.'; T; ~'~ p~ ~ ~~ Board amendment additions are in double-underlined Arial font. Board amendment deletions are in Asterisks (* *) indicate the omission of unchanged Code subsections or parts of tables. Be it ordained by the People of the City and County of San Francisco: Section. Findings. (a) CEQA and Land Use Findings. () The Planning Department has determined that the Planning Code amendment proposed in this ordinance is subject to a Categorical Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code Sections 000 et seq., "CEQA") pursuant to Section 0 of California Code of Regulations, Title, Sections 000 et seq., the Guidelines for implementation of CEQA for actions by regulatory agencies for protection of the environment (in this case, landmark designation). Said determination is BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page

~ ~ on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors in File No. and is ~i 0 `~~ 0 incorporated herein by reference. The Board of Supervisors affirms this determination. {) Pursuant to Planning Code Section 0, the Board of Supervisors finds that the proposed amendment to the landmark designation of 0 Broadway, Assessor's Block No. 0, Lot No. 00 ("Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church" or "0 Broadway"), will serve the public necessity, convenience, and welfare for the reasons set forth in Resolution No. recommending approval of the proposed designation, which is incorporated herein by reference. () The Board of Supervisors finds that the proposed amendment to the landmark designation of Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church is consistent with the General Plan and with Planning Code Section 0. (b) for the reasons set forth in Resolution No. (b) General Findings. () Pursuant to Charter Section., the has authority "to recommend approval, disapproval, or modification of landmark designations and historic district designations under the Planning Code to the Board of Supervisors." () Ordinance No. -, enacted in, designated 0 Broadway, the site of Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church, as Landmark No. 0. That ordinance, which is incorporated herein by reference, required that the particular features to be preserved include those "described in the Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board's Case Report, in Section A, entitled `Architecture,' Subsection No., `Design' and in Section D, `Integrity,' Subsection No. `Alterations'," but it did not list those features in any detail. Moreover, those features refer only to the building's exterior. The ordinance did not BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page

r~ E: ~' 0 0 include any of the building's interior character-defining features as part of the Landmark designation. () On August, 0, the added the interior of Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church to the Landmark Designation Work Program, a list of individual properties and historic districts under consideration for landmark designation, adopted by the at its June, 0 meeting. () The amended Landmark Designation Report prepared for this landmarking amendment was authored by Planning Department Preservation staff. All preparers meet the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for historic preservation program staff, as set forth in Code of Federal Regulations Title, Part, Appendix A. Planning Department staff also reviewed the report for accuracy and conformance with the purposes and standards of Article 0 of the Planning Code. () The, at its regular meeting of, reviewed Planning Department staff's analysis of the historical significance of Iglesia de N uestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church, as well as both the exterior and interior features of the church, pursuant to Article 0 of the Planning Code as part of the Landmark Designation Case Report dated () On,the adopted Resolution No., initiating an amendment of the Landmark Designation of Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church pursuant to Section 00. of the Planning Code. Said resolution is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors in File No. and is incorporated herein by reference. (} On after holding a public hearing on the proposed designation amendment and having considered both the specialized analyses prepared by BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page

'rte '~ 0 ii~~ Planning Department staff and the amended Landmark Designation Report, the Historic Preservation Commission recommended approval of the proposed amendment to the Landmark Designation of Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe ~ Church by Resolution No. to list the exterior and interior features that should be preserved or replaced in kind. Said resolution is on file with the Clerk of the Board in File No. and is incorporated herein by reference. () The Board of Supervisors hereby finds that Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church has a special character and special historical, architectural, and aesthetic interest and value, and that expanding its designation as a Landmark to include interior features will further the purposes of and conform to the standards set forth in Article 0 of the Planning Code. In doing so, the Board hereby incorporates by reference the findings of the amended Landmark Designation Report. Section. Designation. Pursuant to Section 00 of the Planning Code, the Landmark Designation for 0 Broadway (Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church), Assessor's Block No. 0, Lot No. 00, is hereby amended as specified in Section of this ordinance. Appendix A to Article 0 of the Planning Code is hereby amended with respect to Landmark No. 0. 0 Section. Required Data. (a) The description, location, and boundary of the Landmark site consists of the City parcel located at 0 Broadway (Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church), Assessor's Block No. 0, Lot No. 00, in San Francisco's North Beach ~ ~ neighborhood. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page

0 0 (b) The characteristics of the Landmark that justify its designation are described and shown in the Landmark Designation Report and other supporting materials contained in Planning Department Case Docket No. 0-00DES. In summary, Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church, both the exterior and interior, is eligible for local designation as it is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history, embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, and is the work of a master. Specifically, Iglesia de N uestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church is associated with the development of San Francisco's Latino and Spanish-speaking communities from the latenineteenth to the mid-twentieth century, as both the geographical and spiritual heart of the Latino and Spanish-speaking enclave that existed in North Beach until the 0s. Designation of Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church is also appropriate given that it is one of the first churches in the country to be constructed of reinforced concrete, considered an innovative construction technology at that time, and is an exceptional example of an early twentieth century Mission Revival church with a highly ornate interior displaying Renaissance and Baroque ornamentation. Furthermore, Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe/Our Lady of Guadalupe Church is the work of master architects Shea & Lofquist and its interior murals are the work of master artist Luigi Brusatori. (c) The particular features that shall be preserved, or replaced in-kind as determined necessary, are those generally shown in photographs and described in the Landmark Designation Report, which can be found in Planning Department Docket No. 0-00DES, and which are incorporated in this designation by reference as though fully set forth herein. Specifically, the following features shall be preserved or replaced in-kind: () The overall form, structure, height, massing, materials, and architectural ornamentation of the church's exterior identified as: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page

0 `[! 0 E! (A) Two-story height; (B) Cruciform floor plan; ~C) Reinforced concrete construction; (D) Twin towers topped with weathered copper crosses; (E) Rectangular central main entry, topped with "Iglesia de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe" engraving; (F) Mosaic figure of Our Lady of Guadalupe within a round opening bordered by ornamental stucco detailing, topped with Dove of Peace mosaic, located above the central main entry; (G) Arched niches containing sculpted figures, flanking Our Lady of Guadalupe mosaic; (H) Arched secondary entries to the west and east of the central entry; (I) Projecting one-story bay of east entry; (J) Rusticated stucco base containing recessed, arched basement entry; (K) Stucco cladding; (L) Round arches; and (M) Stone steps approaching primary facade entrances. () The overall form, structure, height, massing, materials, and architectural ornamentation of the church's interior identified as: (A) Two-story volume; (B) Cruciform floor plan; (C) Nave with lower aisle wings and an apse and two side altars at the north end of building; (D) Five-bay side aisle arches; (E) All ceiling form and features, including but not limited to: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page

~ (i) Arched barrel vault nave ceiling; (ii) Arched side aisle vault ceilings; (iii) Dentil molding and simple cornice dividing upper and lower ~ nave levels; ~, 0 0 ~ (iv) Beaded molding at the side aisle arches and apse; (v) Decorative ribbing at the barrel vault nave ceiling; (F) Corinthian columns supporting the side aisle arches, painted with a faux-marble finish and bound with amid-column decorative cartouche belt; (G) Cross-vaulted side aisle ceilings visually delineated by wood moldings, each bay containing four separate cartouche motifs and a painted "x" highlighting the cross-vault; (H) The two northmost side aisle ceilings with features as described above and including cherub murals and round stained-glass laylights; (I) Corinthian pilasters at the side aisle walls, aligned with the Corinthian columns and painted with afaux-marble finish; (J) Engaged Corinthian columns circling the apse, painted with a fauxmarble finish and bound with amid-column decorative cartouche belt; (K) All murals on walls and ceiling painted in a Classical style by Luigi Brusatori, including but not limited to: (i) Fresco of the Holy Sacrament and the Coronation of the Blessed Virgin at the nave ceiling; (ii) Fresco depicting the Last Supper and the Multiplication of the Loaves and Fishes at the apse; {iii) Side aisle banners featuring Latin script; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page

~[~l "~ 0 (iv) Slightly projecting portrait medallions at the first-story nave arch junctions and organ loft balcony; (v) -Flush portrait medallions above the narthex; (vi) Crest medallions above the clerestory windows; (vii) Border frieze dividing upper and lower nave levels containing dentil molding, ovular forms, and painted cherub/floral motifs; (viii) Painted statuary figures flanking clerestory windows; (ix) Painted figures at the east and west walls of organ loft, within painted rope-coil frames; (L) Arched stained-glass aisle windows portraying the miracle at Guadalupe, the Sermon on the Mount, and other passages of the Bible; (M) Shallow arched stained-glass clerestory windows portraying saints ~ set within wood frames and topped with decorative, circular grilles; (N) Amber glass windows throughout the building; (0) Wood parquet flooring located at former pew seating areas; (P) Tile flooring located at center aisle and remaining areas; (Q) Central entry hall cross-vaulted painted ceiling; (R) All interior millwork and molding, such as window surrounds, painted wood panels under molded wall sill, wood stair balustrade and newel posts; (S) Southeast entry room containing an arched stained-glass window and an arched multi-lite amber art-glass window, each flanked by blind niches; (T) Double-height arched pediment wood door surround and wood ~ ~ confessional vestibules at the south portion of the nave against the north-facing narthex wall; (U) Organ loft at south portion of nave; and (V) -set pipe mechanical Hook and Hastings organ. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page

I ~ Section. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective 0 days after enactment. Enactment occurs when the Mayor signs the ordinance, the Mayor returns the ordinance unsigned or does not sign the ordinance within ten days of receiving it, or the Board of Supervisors overrides the Mayor's veto of the ordinance. APPROVED AS TO FORM: DENNIS J. HERRERA, City Attorney 0 By: A DREA RU - QUIDE Deputy City tt ney n:\lega n aas0\000\00. docx 0 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page

Salgado, Rebecca (C eiv t HP Hearing ~_., ~.~ gj From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Gary Jeffrey <gary jeffrey@gmail.com> Wednesday, December, 0 0: AM Salgado, Rebecca (CPC) Yolanda Lew Re: Project Plans--0- Fair Oaks Rebecca M y first concern is that an addition to the structure that rises above the front wall will change the character of the building. Three and a half feet seems a significant change to the style of the building as it presently exists. Also as noted previously, the photos submitted with the plans do not reflect the changes adequately. From my front door across the street and from my neighbors front door those changes will be much more apparent. I know that various neighbors have voiced concern about the effects of adding another floor. I will talk to them and get their feedback regarding whether they still feel that way. Second, I am concerned about the scale of the project. As you probably know this block on Fair Oaks as been subjected to a massive rebuild of the Zuckerberg house that went on for two years and created all sorts of confusion, hassle, traffic problems, parking problems, noise and inconveniences. I am concerned that they do not occupy spaces in front of the house every day for an extended period of time. This concern has also been conveyed to me by neighbors. Thanks Gary ~ary.leffrev@~mail.com CP: () - From: "Salgado, Rebecca (CPC)" <rebecca.salgado@sfgov.org> Date: Tuesday, December, 0 at :0 PM To: "gary.jeffrey@gmailcom" <gary.jeffrey@gmail.com> Cc: "Yolanda Lew (flourishmeister@gmailcom)" <flourishmeister@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Project Plans--0- Fair Oaks H i Gary, The roof of the new addition is proposed to be three-and-a-half feet taller than the top of the front wall. The addition is set feet back from the front wall. This information can be seen on sheets A-. and A-. of the plans that I sent. Please let me know if this clarifies your questions. If you have any concerns or comments that you'd like to share with the ARC committee tomorrow, feel free to submit these concerns to me via email for me to share at the hearing. The hearing starts at noon, so I would need to hear from you by at the latest to be able to print out any concerns you may have before the hearing. Thanks, Rebecca From: Jeffrey, Gary <GJeffrey@ReedSmith.com> Sent: Tuesday, December, 0 : PM i