Third Runway Project APM Depot Fire Engineering Design. Presented by Ir Wilson Sau-kit TSANG

Similar documents
Case Study 1 Underground Car Park

Prescriptive Requirement for Smoke Control

Provisions for the Means of Escape and Means of Access by Using Lifts and Escalators in the MTRC Main (U/G) Station

Technical Seminar on the Code of Practice for Fire Safety in Buildings 2011

The Code of Practice for Fire Safety in Buildings 2011 It comprises 7 parts and 1 annex:

Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors Pre-qualification Structural Learning. Code of Practice for Fire Safety in Buildings 2011 July 2012

Smoke Control Requirements for New Railway Infrastructure. Ir Peter Law

Case Study 1 Underground car park

Case Study of Underground Car Park. Team Japan

CHOOSING A FIRE VENTILATION STRATEGY FOR AN UNDERGROUND METRO STATION

Fire and smoke management in a uni-directional road tunnel for a congested traffic condition

incorporating Contractors guide to car park ventilation A no-nonsense guide to the safe ventilation of underground and covered car parks

FORMULATION OF FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURES

Tunnel Fire Dynamics and Evacuation Simulations

Virtual Compartment: An Alternative Approach to Means of Egress Design in Airport Pedestrian Tunnel

technical specification smoke venting systems

A New Zealand Case Study Building Design 11 th International Conference on Performance

Sprinklers Modeling for Tunnel Road Fire Fighting

PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHODS

COMPLIANCE ALTERNATIVES

UCL PRINCIPAL CONTRACTOR SITE FIRE SAFETY RISK REVIEW & MITIGATION MEASURES

Hot Issues in Fire Engineering July 2014

CHAPTER 7 MECHANICAL VENTILATION AND SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS 7.1 AIR CONDITIONING & MECHANICAL VENTILATION SYSTEMS

PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHODS

Design of Fire safety in Multi Occupancy Residential Accommodation

COMPLIANCE ALTERNATIVES

Research Needs for the Fire Safety Engineering Profession

PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHODS

incorporating Guidance to Shafts for Smoke Control A useful guide to practical smoke shaft principals and specifications

How to Use Fire Risk Assessment Tools to Evaluate Performance Based Designs

Fire station fire design manual

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF FIRE SPREAD IN TERMINAL 2 OF BELGRADE AIRPORT. PO Box 522, Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro

Preparedness Committee Security and Life Safety Commercial Office Building Protective Measures

Applying the New Zealand Performance Based Design Fire Framework to Buildings Designed in Accordance with NFPA5000

Technical Information

REVIEW OF TECHNICAL STANDARDS AND CALCULATION METHODS FOR DIMENSIONING OF SMOKE AND HEAT CONTROL SYSTEMS IN CASE OF FIRE IN UNDERGROUND CAR PARKS

CFD ASSESSMENT OF RAILWAY TUNNEL TRAIN FIRE SCENARIOS

SCALE MODEL STUDIES ON SMOKE MOVEMENT IN INCLINED TUNNEL WITH LONGITUDINAL VENTILATION AND SMOKE BARRIERS

Crossrail. Clare Hebden; September 2012

Impact of quick incident detection on safety in terms of ventilation response

The Singapore Fire safety Engineering Guidelines (SFEG)

Case Study for Performance-Based Design in Hong Kong

Fire and Smoke Management in a Uni-Directional Road Tunnel for a Congested Traffic Condition

COSTCO, SAN FRANCISCO A PRESCRIPTIVE AND PERFORMANCE BASED ANALYSIS OF FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND DESIGN

THE REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT NEW BUILDINGS

Element C3.5 Means of Escape

Statue of Liberty: A Risk Analysis

Life Safety - Means of Egress/Exits NFPA 101

FINDINGS FROM FIRE TESTS IN TUNNEL CONSTRUCTIONS WITH VENTILATION SYSTEMS AND FIXED FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS

Considerations in the Design of Smoke Management Systems for Atriums

The Swedish National Board of Housing, Building and Planning s general recommendations on the analytical design of a building s fire protection, BBRAD

GUIDELINES FOR HIGHRISE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (MECHANICAL VENTILATION)

Unit 2 Fire Safety (Zone 1)

Fire Curtains and Radiation Attenuation

HKIE Fire Division 9 th Annual Symposium

UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON EMERGENCY PLAN. Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 PART ONE - SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS & OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION:

Underground fires in metro systems failures, accidents and terrorism

Agency for Health Care Administration

SMOKE MANAGEMENT AND EGRESS ANALYSIS OF A SPORTS ARENA USING THE PERFORMANCE-BASED DESIGN

Modeling a real backdraft incident fire

FIRE EVACUATION PLAN PRATT STREET PARKING GARAGE AND ATHLETIC CENTER POLICE FIRE MEDICAL EMERGENCY

Fire resistance. Appendix E. E.1 Fire resistance. Appendix. (A copy of this Appendix is available on /)

University of Maryland FIRE EVACUATION PLAN

EQUIVALENT INITIAL FIRE SAFETY ASSESSMENT

Construction Innovation Center Building 186

Emergency Ventilation System Design - Preliminary Report Shishir Gupta

Kensington Aldridge Academy, London W10

Topic: Building Evacuation Modeling. Technical Director, WSP (Asia) Ltd.

CFD-AIDED TENABILITY ASSESSMENT OF RAILWAY TUNNEL TRAIN FIRE SCENARIOS

Northern Ireland HMO Fire Safety Guide

Smoke Management in Subway Stations Due to Train Arson Fire Scenario

Case Study 2 Production and Storage. SFPE Polish Chapter Wojciech Węgrzyński, Grzegorz Krajewski Building Research Institute (ITB)

GAUTENG DEPARTMENT OF INFRUSTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

Human Factors - Egress Analysis for High Hazard Occupancies. Presented by: Michael J. Klemenz, PE, SFPE

FP-PGN-14 Part of NTW(O)41 Fire Policy

- CONSTRUCTION FIRE SAFETY STANDARDS

THE REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT HORSEFAIR HOUSE

Agency for Health Care Administration

NUMERICAL STUDIES ON BARE CABIN FIRES WITH OPERATION OF SMOKE EXTRACTION SYSTEM

THE REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT NO 68 (ENGLISH AND PHILOSOPHY)

THE REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT SPORTS CENTRE

Mechanical Smoke Extract Shaft Systems

INITIAL FIRE ASSESSMENT REPORT (FAR)

2015 SFPE Europe Conference on Fire Safety Engineering

University of Maryland FIRE EVACUATION PLAN NATIONAL DENTAL MUSEUM POLICE FIRE MEDICAL EMERGENCY Anyone discovering excessive heat,

MAINTENANCE OF ESSENTIAL SAFETY MEASURES EXPLAINED (Building Regulations 2006)

ANALYSIS OF SMOKE MOVEMENT IN A BUILDING VIA ELEVATOR SHAFTS

NEW PROJECTS DOCUMENTATION FOR OCCUPATION - REGULATION 38 FIRE STRATEGIES, DRAWINGS & INFORMATION EMPLOYER S REQUIREMENTS

FIRE DEPARTMENT - RULES FOR FIRE PROTECTION IN AUSTRIA

and Sprinkler System in Resalat Tunnel of Tehran

Preview of the MA Building Code (780 CMR) 9 th edition

First Aspen Federal Regulation Set: K LSC 2000 Health Existing

Appendix AUSTRIA Vienna Kaisermühlentunnel

Crossrail Fire Safety Designs

GAUTENG DEPARTMENT OF INFRUSTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON EMERGENCY PLAN. Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 PART ONE - SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS & OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION:

Enclosure 4- RISK ASSESSMENT

Japanese Case Study: How to maintain the fire safety in subway station and tunnel

EVACUATION PROCEDURES IN EDUCATION PREMISES

IBC Committee Responsibility Matrix January 2017

Transcription:

1 Third Runway Project APM Depot Fire Engineering Design Presented by Ir Wilson Sau-kit TSANG 1

2

Presentation Overview 1. Project Background and Depot Overview 2. Building Information and Challenge for Code Compliant Design 3. Summary of Fire Safety Provisions 4. Non-code Compliant Items 5. Overview of Fire Engineering Approach 6. Fire Safety Management Plan

1 Project Background and Depot Overview

Key Issues related to New APM Depot Depot design concept was presented to BD/FSD in Jan 2014 Following key issues on the Depot were discussed. Underground APM depot. Compartment size exceeding the Codes of Practice 10,500 sq.m, Common Emergency Vehicle Access at ground floor could adequately serve both APM depot below ground and commercial development above ground floor Underground APM depot together with the ground floor plant rooms, MoA and MoE staircases are to be treated as a separate building from the commercial development. Separate Occupation Permit for Depot. Hot works activity in the underground depot. Gas cylinders will not be stored in the underground APM depot as per the Dangerous Goods Ordinance.

Site Plan Asia Expo Existing Carpark CHEK LAP KOK LOT No. 1 & THE EXTENSION THERETO Terminal 2 Sky City Rd E Skypier Existing SkyCity Golf Course Plaza Basement Site Boundary Aboveground Site Boundary

Site Photo

8 2 Building Information & Challenge for Code Compliant Design

Building Information & Challenge for Code Compliant Design Building Information Unique Building Type - Underground Automated People Mover (APM) Depot Use Classification under FS Code 2011 6a Large Building Footprint - approximately 32,000 m 2 (370mL x 90mW) Occupant Capacity 60 people per shift i.e. maximum 120 people Length of APM 60 to 72m (6 cars) Challenge for Code Compliant Design Difficult to subdivide the Depot due to Functional and Operational Need Difficult to locate Firefighting and Rescue Stairway due to Large and Deep Building Footprint

Level 1 Zoning Plan (Underground Level) Terminal 2 Expansion (Under separate submission) TRC APM Tunnel (Under separate submission) Support Area and Plant Area Support Area and Plant Area Maintenance and Stabling Area (Third Runway Concourse Line) T1 Line Turnback Maintenance and Stabling Area (Terminal 1 Line / SkyPier Line) -4.610 FFL APM/BHS Tunnel between APM Interchange Station and SkyPier/ITT Station (A&A Plan and FER approved under separate submission)

Level 1 Functional Diagram of Maintenance & Stabling Area Heavy Maintenance Stabling Heavy Maintenance Light Maintenance Light Maintenance

Level 2 Plan (Mezzanine Level) +1.415 FFL Maintenance Platform High Level Protected Corridor

Airport Road Level 3 Plan (Ground Level) FRS and MOE Staircase +7.140 FFL Under T2 Submission MOE Staircase Firefighting and Rescue Stairway Plant Room Loading Bay Soil Surcharge

Longitudinal Section Future NCD above 6025 5725 L3 +7.140 FFL L2 +1.415 FFL L1-4.610 FFL Envisaged Area to be handed over to NCD Support Area and Plant Area Maintenance and Stabling Area

3 Summary of Fire Safety Provisions

Fire Resisting Construction - Level 1 Plan Compartment Area at Support Area and Plant Area Code Compliant Oversize Compartment at Maintenance and Stabling Area & T1 Line Turnback (> 10,500 m 2 ) Fire Engineering Support Area and Plant Area T1 Line Turnback Maintenance and Stabling Area Support Area and Plant Area

Means of Escape - Level 1 Plan MoE at Support Area and Plant Area (18m/36m) Code Compliant Extended MoE travel distance at Maintenance and Stabling Area & T1 Line Turnback (25m/50m) Fire Engineering Extended Staircase Separation at Maintenance and Stabling Area & T1 Line Turnback (over 48m) Fire Engineering Support Area and Plant Area Support Area and Plant Area S.S. 80m Maintenance and Stabling Area T1 Line Turnback S.S. 100m S.S. 115m Protected Exit

Airport Road Means of Access - Level 3 Plan EVA Code Compliant 13.5m 7.3m 13.5m Fire Service Access Point Emergency Vehicular Access

Means of Access (Firefighting and Rescue Stairway) - Level 1 Plan MoA travel distance at Support Area and Plant Area Code Compliant Extended MoA travel distance at Maintenance and Stabling Area & T1 Line Turnback Fire Engineering Support Area and Plant Area Support Area and Plant Area Maintenance and Stabling Area T1 Line Turnback Extended MoA Protected Corridor Firefighting and Rescue Stairway

4 Non-code Compliant Items

Non-code Compliant Items Terminal 2 Expansion Separate submission Third Runway Concourse APM Tunnel Separate submission Support Area and Plant Area Follow FS Code 2011 Support Area and Plant Area T1 Line Turnback Maintenance and Stabling Area (Third Runway Concourse Line) Maintenance and Stabling Area (Terminal 1 Line / SkyPier Line) Support Area and Plant Area SkyPier APM/BHS Tunnel Separate submission Support Area and Plant Area Follow FS Code 2011 Maintenance and Stabling Area T1 Line Turnback Fire Engineering Approach to justify: NC1: Oversize fire compartment NC2: Extended MoE travel distance NC3: Extended staircase separation NC4: Extended MoA travel distance

Non-code Compliant Items NC1: Oversize fire compartment Deviation from Deemed-to- Comply Provisions FS Code 2011 (Clause C3.1) Every building should be divided into fire compartments by fire barriers without exceeding the prescribed limit of fire compartment area (10,500m 2 ). Non-code Compliant Designs Maintenance and Stabling Area: ~20,000m 2 T1 Line Turnback: ~2,700m 2 with no fire separation with adjoining APM tunnel

Non-code Compliant Items NC1: Oversize fire compartment Compartment 4 (Support Area and Plant Area) Area ~760m 2 (<10,500m 2 ) Compartment 1 (Maintenance and Stabling Area) Area ~20,000m 2 (>10,500m 2 ) Protected by engineered dynamic smoke extraction system Compartment 2 (Support Area and Plant Area) Area ~4,500m 2 (<10,500m 2 ) Fire Shutter Fire Shutter Fire Shutter Fire Shutter Compartment 3 (T1 Line Turnback) ~2,700m 2 with no fire separation with adjoining APM tunnel Protected by push-pull longitudinal system Compartment 5 (Support Area and Plant Area) Area ~300m 2 (<10,500m 2 )

Non-code Compliant Items NC2: Extended travel distance for means of escape Deviation from Deemed-to- Comply Provisions FS Code 2011 (Clause B11.2) The dead end travel distance is limited to 18m to a protected exit or to a point from which travel in different directions to 2 or more protected exits is available. Non-code Compliant Designs Maintenance and Stabling Area: 50m to the nearest protected exit and 25m for dead end situation T1 Line Turnback: Exit points at both ends of T1 Line Turnback (260m apart) FS Code 2011 (Clause B11.3) Travel distance to the nearest protected exit is limited to 36m when two or more protected exits are available.

Non-code Compliant Items Key Protected Corridor Protected Staircase Exit Point of T1 Line Turnback Protected Exit of Maintenance and Stabling Area Locations of Protected Exits for Maintenance and Stabling Area and T1 Line Turnback (Level 1)

Non-code Compliant Items NC2: Extended travel distance for means of escape Exit route Any point in the Depot Unprotected route Protected route Required staircase Ultimate place of safety Travel distance Maintenance and Stabling Area using fire engineering approach Protected exit When two or more protected exits to an ultimate place of safety are available 50m Maximum Travel Distances For dead end situation 25m T1 Line Turnback using fire engineering approach Support Area and Plant Area following prescriptive requirements Exit points at two ends (260m apart) 36m N/A 18m

Non-code Compliant Items NC2: Extended travel distance for means of escape Level 1 Key Plan 8 15 E 47m 47m Level 1 Enlarge View MoE Travel Distance Illustration

Non-code Compliant Items NC3: Extended staircase separation Deviation from Deemed-to- Comply Provisions FS Code 2011 (Clause B11.3b) The horizontal distance measured on plan along the centreline of the exit route between a required staircase or a discharge point and any one of the other required staircases or discharge points should not exceed 48m. Non-code Compliant Designs Maximum separation between two staircases will be >48m.

Non-code Compliant Items NC4: Extended travel distance for means of access for firefighting and rescue Deviation from Deemed-to- Comply Provisions FS Code 2011 (Clause D15.6) No part of the floor served by a FRS should be more than 60m from the door of the lobby to the FRS measured along actual passages. Non-code Compliant Designs Maintenance and Stabling Area: 60m from the door of the protected corridor T1 Line Turnback: Firemen can access to the T1 Line Turnback from either end of T1 Line Turnback (260m apart)

Non-code Compliant Items NC4: Extended travel distance for means of access for firefighting and rescue Prescriptive Approach Door of FRS Lobby Unprotected route ( 60m) Any point in the Depot Fire Engineering Approach Door of FRS Lobby Extended Protected Route Unprotected route ( 60m) Any point in the Depot

Non-code Compliant Items NC4: Extended travel distance for means of access for firefighting and rescue FS Control Room EVA EVA Key EVA Fire Service Access Point FS Control Room

Non-code Compliant Items NC4: Extended travel distance for means of access for firefighting and rescue Key Protected Corridor Fireman s Lift Exit Point of T1 Line Turnback Protected Exit of Maintenance and Stabling Area Locations of Protected Exits for Maintenance and Stabling Area (Level 1)

Non-code Compliant Items NC4: Extended travel distance for means of access for firefighting and rescue Level 1 Key Plan 15 21 54m 54m D Fireman s Lift Level 1 Enlarge View MoA Travel Distance Illustration

5 Overview of Fire Engineering Approach

Overview of Fire Engineering Approach Key Objectives: 1. Protection of life of building occupants 2. Minimization of fire and smoke spread 3. Facilitation of firefighting and rescue

Overview of Fire Engineering Approach ASET/RSET Analysis 1. Available Safe Egress Time (ASET) by Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis using Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) 2. Required Safe Egress Time (RSET) by evacuation analysis using STEPS 3. ASET > RSET with safety factor of 1.5

Overview of Fire Engineering Approach Maintenance and Stabling Area Dynamic smoke extraction system Smoke zone area 2000m 2 Smoke zone length 60m Bottom level of smoke barriers = 5.76m AFFL Smoke extraction rate = 119m 3 /s Bottom level of smoke barriers = 4.25m AFFL Smoke extraction rate = 77m 3 /s 905m 2 850m2 990m 2 1040m 2 1415m 2 1190m 2 1965m 2 875m 2 1480m 2 T1 Line Turnback A Section A-A A 1680m 2 1600m 2 1965m 2 1845m 2 1895m 2 1430m 2 1760m 2

Mechanical Smoke Extraction System Smoke Extraction System (Maintenance / Stabling Area) Subdivided into (16) smoke zones Area 2000m 2 and Length 60m Boundary fire scenario confined across TWO smoke zones only Smoke Clear Height Smoke Extraction Rate (w/ 10% safety) Light Maintenance/Stabling Area 4450 AFFL 77 m 3 /s Heavy Maintenance Area 5960 AFFL 119 m 3 /s

Overview of Fire Engineering Approach CFD Simulation Scenarios Scenario 3 10MW APM fire Three sides enclosed by walls Bottom level of smoke barriers = 5.76m AFFL Smoke extraction rate = 119m 3 /s Bottom level of smoke barriers = 4.25m AFFL Smoke extraction rate = 77m 3 /s Scenario 1 10MW APM fire Three-side connections with other smoke zones Scenario 2 10MW APM fire Three sides enclosed by walls Scenario 4 10MW APM fire Three sides enclosed by walls Scenario 5 10MW APM fire Boundary fire scenario

Mechanical Smoke Extraction System Smoke Extraction System (Maintenance / Stabling Area) Dual purpose ductwork (SED / EAD), four dedicated smoke extraction plants, each plant comprises with N duty + 1 standby smoke extraction fan

Overview of Fire Engineering Approach CFD Analysis Acceptance Criteria follows FS Code 2011 Items Minimum smoke clear height Visibility at level below smoke clear height Temperature at level below smoke clear height Radiant heat flux Carbon monoxide (CO) concentration at level below smoke layer height Acceptance Criteria 2m 10m 60 o C <2.5kW/m 2 or about 200 o C for the hot smoke layer at 2m above finished floor level 1,000ppm

Overview of Fire Engineering Approach CFD Simulation Scenario 1 CFD simulation results at steady state Temperature 2m AFFL o C Visibility 2m AFFL m Carbon Monoxide 2m AFFL 1x10-3 mol/mol

Overview of Fire Engineering Approach T1 Line Turnback Push-pull longitudinal smoke control system Critical velocity = 1.6m/s Critical tunnel ventilation airflow = 82m 3 /s Smoke free on one side T1 Line Tunnel in the T2 Expansion Area T1 Line Turnback in the Depot T1 Line Turnback APM T1 Line Tunnel

Overview of Fire Engineering Approach MoE Characteristics 1. Low occupant capacity (60 staff per shift) Density: ~500m 2 per staff 2. Extensive number of protected exits Required: 2 numbers Provided: 25 numbers for travel distance 3. Accessible to trained staff only

Overview of Fire Engineering Approach Evacuation Analysis Evacuation Scenarios Scenario No. 1 All exits are available for use Description 2 An exit used by the most evacuees in the Maintenance and Stabling Area in Scenario No. 1 is blocked by a fire 3 Same as Scenario No. 2, except additional two maintenance staff working on the maintenance platform at high level Key Protected Corridor Exit Point of T1 Line Turnback Protected Exit of Maintenance and Stabling Area Unavailable Exit in Evacuation Scenario No.2 and 3

Overview of Fire Engineering Approach Evacuation Analysis Computational Evacuation Model Results Evacuation Scenario No. Physical Travel Time to Cat Ladder Physical Travel Time to Protected Exit Physical Travel Time to Ultimate Place of Safety 1 N/A 85s 301s 2 N/A 84s 309s 3 19s 86s 311s Staff reached protected exit ~85s Staff reached Ultimate Place of Safety ~301s Any point in the Depot 0s 50s 100s 150s 200s 250s 300s Timeline

Overview of Fire Engineering Approach ASET/RSET Analysis Parameter Time to raise a fire alarm (1) Pre-movement time (2) Physical travel time (3) RSET, (1) + (2) + (3) Time 172s 90s 86s 348s ASET 3,600s Safety Factor (ASET / RSET) 10.3 ASET RSET 348s 3,600s Timeline

Fire Shutter Operation Measures to prevent collision between APM and fire shutter Non-automated track: Management procedures Automated track: Alternative operation procedures Non-automated track Fire shutter adopts alternative operation procedures Fire shutter adopts management procedures Automated track Non-automated track Automated track Fire shutter adopts alternative operation procedures Fire shutter adopts management procedures

Fire Shutter Operation Non-automated track: Management procedures Before APM passing through fire shutter line Ground technician to present at the fire shutter lines Ground technician, operator in APM Central Control Room and APM vehicle operator to inform each other the next action to be carried out During APM passing through fire shutter line Ground technician to push and hold the stop button of fire shutter continuously After APM passing through fire shutter line Ground technician to check the APM passed the fire shutter line Ground technician to release the stop button of fire shutter

Fire Shutter Operation Automated track: Alternative operation procedures Fire signal to close fire shutter Closing signal to fire shutter Location of APM Outside Approach Zone Within Approach Zone APM Operation and Fire Shutter Operation APM to stop before fire shutter Fire shutter to descend within 15 to 60s APM to continue movement until leaving fire shutter (45s) Fire shutter to be descended within 15 to 60s Approach Zone : This zone is defined as a distance from the fire shutter in which a 6-car APM, travelling at the allowed speed, would be able to stop before the line of fire shutter, assuming worst-case braking profile.

6 Fire Safety Management Plan

Fire Safety Management Plan Fire Safety Management Plan Fire Action Plan Maintenance Plan Training Plan

Fire Safety Management Plan Fire Action Plan: To work out and document the predetermined procedures for all parties to follow in the event of a fire emergency Fire Alarm Alerting AA, FSD, Police AVSECO for Response Identifying Alarm Location Investigation on Site Alarm Determination Evacuation to Nearest FAP Genuine Fire False Alarm Roll Call for Person(s) Missing Rescue & Fire Fighting by FSD Stand-down Stand-down Investigate False Alarm Fire Site Release by Police Controlled Return of Evacuees to Building Area Cordoning/ Cleaning Up/ Post Fire Investigation Building Utilities/ Systems Repair Fire Alarm System Reset Resume Normal Operation

Fire Safety Management Plan Maintenance Plan To document the periodic maintenance requirements so that fire safety provisions are kept in good working order Follow statutory maintenance requirements Maintenance Plan Proper maintenance records Regular housekeeping Work Permit System and Permit-to-Work System

Fire Safety Management Plan Training Plan To ensure staff are familiar with the fire safety provisions installed and the actions to be taken in case of fire Staff duties for routine inspection Staff duties for dealing with a fire incident Training Plan Staff training programme Staff training records Emergency preparedness

Thank You