RESOLUTION NO. PC

Similar documents
STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Conduct Public Hearing to vacate certain public right of way adjacent to Sycamore Avenue and San Pablo Avenue

ORDINANCE NO. 430 REGARDING WATER CONSERVATION

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City certified said General Plan Update FPEIR, which certification was not appealed; and

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

Item 10E 1 of 5

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the proposed Master Plan for Villa Esperanza (VE), located at 2116

ORDINANCE NO

THE VILLAGE OF HAWTHORN WOODS PLUMBING CODE

Preserve the Flower and Strawberry Fields and Save Carlsbad Taxpayers* Money

AGENDA ITEM # 13A/B. AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Village Board Meeting December 10, 2018

CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS ORDINANCE NO. 12, 2002

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH STAFF REPORT. THROUGH: Marisa Lundstedt, Director of Community Development

WHEREAS, a number of these buildings are potentially historic structures;

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 23, 2019

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING

IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES:

The maximum amounts shown in the Engineer s Report for each of those categories for FY 2008/09 are as follows (per house/per year):

ORDINANCE NO

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G. 1 STAFF REPORT August 4, Staff Contact: Tricia Shortridge (707)

S P E C I F I C DEVELOPMENT NO. 78 A M E N D M E N T APPLICATION C I T Y C O U N C I L A C T I O N S E P T E M B E R 1 9,

PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO GREEN LINE MIXED USE SPECIFIC PLAN

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City provided the proposed code amendments to the Washington State Department of Commerce on September 20, 2017; and

ORDINANCE NO The Sanitary Board of the Oro Loma Sanitary District, Alameda County, California, does ordain as follows:

Council approve the general plan amendment, zone change, and planned development overlay zone; and

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

WHEREAS, the City of Albany has adopted a Fire Prevention Regulations in the form of Chapter XI of the Albany Municipal Code; and

AGENDA ITEM: IOWA. west] that were not FISCAL IMPACT. the City of Clive. STAFF REVIEW. Resolution II. Amendment PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY:

CITY OF SAN MATEO ORDINANCE NO

TOWNSHIP OF FAIRFIELD ORDINANCE #

CITY OF MALIBU PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 8B5

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD RESOLUTION NO.

- INVITATION - COURTESY INFORMATIONAL MEETING

RESOLUTION NO: WHEREAS, the subject property has a Public, Semi-Public (PS) zoning designation and a General Plan designation of Institutional; and

VENTURA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO (Adopted November 7, 2017, Supersedes Ordinance No. 4415)

RESOLUTION NO

MEETING DATE: November 12, 2013 SUBJECT: Accept Borden Road Bridge Improvement (CIP No )

CITY OF YUBA CITY STAFF REPORT

Planning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008

least as effective as" requirement of state law, minimize the complexity and cost of compliance, and provide consistency between local jurisdictions.

4/8/2015 Item #10D Page 1

The City of Carlsbad Planning Division A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this Ordinance is consistent with the City of Winter Garden Comprehensive Plan; and

Agenda Report DESIGNATION OF 1855 E. COLORADO BOULEVARD (FORMER DRAPER'S BUILDING) AS A LANDMARK

CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM

ADOPTION OF THE REVISED OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of Riverdale (the City ) has a planning commission and has adopted a general plan pursuant to applicable law; and

CITY OF LARKSPUR Staff Report. August 21, 2013 Council Meeting UPDATE ON TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY OF MARIN (TAM) GREENBRAE CORRIDOR WORKING GROUP

Planning Commission Staff Report February 5, 2015

RD:VMT:JMD 10/14/2015 RESOLUTION NO.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN BAUTISTA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

EAST LAKE TARPON COMMUNITY OVERLAY

AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 CITY OF HAWTHORNE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL. For the special meeting of: March 8, 2016 Originating Department: Planning

ORDINANCE NO

Design Review Commission Report

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the recommendations from the Pinellas County Local Planning Agency have been received and considered.

CITY OF MORRO BAY PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT 955 SHASTA AVENUE. MORRO BAY, CA

CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM

VILLAGE BOARD MEETING STAFF REPORT

MINUTES OF TOWN BOARD MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 18, 2017 AT 7:00 PM AT TOWN HALL, ONE OVEROCKER ROAD POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK

AGENDA ITEM NO. 17. Interim City Manager: Arnold Shadbehr Dir. Of Planning: Brian James

AGENDA 07/14/11 PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting

CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION

PC RESOLUTION NO

CITY OF RIFLE, COLORADO ORDINANCE NO. 31 SERIES OF 2003

ORDINANCE NO

PC RESOLUTION NO GRADING PLAN MODIFICATION (GPM)

Report to City Council

REPORT TO COUNCIL City of Sacramento

A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 9, KAUAI COUNTY CODE 1987, RELATING TO STREET REQUIRE:MENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS

M E M O R A N D U M. Brenda Garton, County Administrator Ted Wilmot, County Attorney Garrey Curry, Asst. Co. Administrator for Community Development

AGENDA ITEM No. 13 RESOLUTION No CITY OF HAWTHORNE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL

LOS ANGELES AIRPORT/EL SEGUNDO DUNES Specific Plan

ORDINANCE NO

City of San Mateo General Plan Circulation Element. Adopted October 18, 2010

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Eric Angstadt, Director, Planning and Development

The full agenda including staff reports and supporting materials are available at City Hall.

Planning Commission Draft Motion No HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 2010

ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF POWELL RIVER

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Venice Pumping Plant Dual Force Main Project Draft EIR

Executive Summary Planning Code and Zoning Map Amendments HEARING DATE: JUNE 18, 2015

RESOLUTION NO. R

COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ 0545

Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner

Community Development

ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE TO ADD A NEW SECTION 4.N. IN THE ZONING CODE FOR THE TOWN OF MIDDLETOWN, RELATING TO MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT

NOTICE OF PREPARATION

Draft Planning Commission Resolution Proposed Commission Policy and Planning Code Amendment

CLACKAMAS COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 2051 Kaen Road, Oregon City BCC Hearing Room - 4th Floor. LAND USE HEARING October 3, :30 AM

RANDOLPH M A S T E R P L A N. Township of W H E R E L I F E I S W O R T H L I V I N G. Morris County, New Jersey

CITY of WILMINGTON North Carolina

WATER CONSERVATION ORDINANCE FOR LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION ORDINANCE N

CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda

RESOLUTION NO

ORDINANCE 2009-_15_ WATER CONSERVATION POLICY

Transcription:

RESOLUTION NO. PC 2018-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2018-05, ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE LOCAL COASTAL PLAN, NORTH 101 CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AND GENERAL PLAN TO CLARIFY PROVISIONS FOR VARIATIONS OF ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ON NORTH COAST HIGHWAY 101 BETWEEN LA COSTA TO THE NORTH AND A STREET TO THE SOUTH (CASE NUMBER: 10-036 GPA/SPA/LCPA; CITYWIDE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on March 1, 2018, to discuss and consider proposed amendments to the Local Coastal Plan, General Plan and North 101 Corridor Specific Plan, at which time all those desiring to be heard were heard; WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to the Local Coastal Plan, North 101 Corridor Specific Plan and the General Plan are required to clarify provisions for roadway improvements between the documents; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the amendment is consistent with the purposes of the General Plan, the North 101 Corridor Specific Plan, and other applicable City ordinances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Encinitas hereby makes a recommendation to the City Council to approve the proposed Amendments to the North 101 Corridor Specific Plan and the General Plan to authorize the reduction in the number of traffic lanes on N. Coast Highway 101 between A Street to the south and La Costa Avenue to the north by adopting Draft Ordinance No. 2018-05 attached hereto as Attachment A; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission, in its independent judgment, recommends that the City Council certify the Final Environmental Impact Report as complete through City Council Resolution No. 2018-35. The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the project to identify the significant effects of the project on the environment, to identify alternatives, and to indicate the manner in which the significant effects can be mitigated or avoided. Pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines, a 45-day public review and comment period was established (December 2, 2016 to January 16, 2017) for the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Additionally, a supplemental 45-day public review and comment period was established (March 14, 2017 to April 28, 2017) for recirculation of portions of the Draft EIR. The recirculated Draft EIR reevaluated the project s impact on emergency services. Responses to public comments on the Draft EIR have been prepared and are included in the Final EIR. The EIR concludes that the Project would result in potentially significant effects on traffic circulation and fire protection services. As part of the EIR s impact analysis, it was determined that the significant traffic circulation impacts are unavoidable; however, the project s impact on fire protection services can be mitigated below a level of significance. The significant traffic circulation impacts would occur at a road segment of North Coast Highway 101 and an Interstate southbound onramp during build-out (Year 2035) conditions. At the southbound North Coast Highway 101 segment between Leucadia Boulevard and El Portal Street, the project would cause operating conditions to worsen to unacceptable (Level of Service E ) conditions. It should be noted that the impact at the North Coast Highway 101 road 2018-03-21 Item 10A (CC-4c PC Resolution No. 14 LCPA-GP-SPA) 1 of 9

2018-03-21 Item 10A (CC-4c PC Resolution No. 14 LCPA-GP-SPA) 2 of 9

ATTACHMENT A DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 2018-05 2018-03-21 Item 10A (CC-4c PC Resolution No. 14 LCPA-GP-SPA) 3 of 9

ORDINANCE NO. 2018-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE LOCAL COASTAL PLAN, NORTH 101 CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE GENERAL PLAN TO CLARIFY PROVISIONS FOR ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ON NORTH COAST HIGHWAY 101 CASE NUMBER: 10-036 GPA/SPA/LCPA/EIR; CITYWIDE SECTION ONE. The City Council of the City of Encinitas hereby finds and declares as follows: WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to the Local Coastal Plan, North 101 Corridor Specific Plan and the General Plan are required to clarify provisions for variations to roadway improvements between the documents; WHEREAS, the City Council certified the Final Environmental Impact Report as complete through City Council Resolution No. 2018-35; WHEREAS, a Public Notice of Availability of proposed Local Coastal Plan Amendments (LCPA) was issued which opened a six-week public review period that ran from February 16, 2018, to March 30, 2018; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing on March 1, 2018, for the purpose of considering amendments to the Local Coastal Plan, North 101 Corridor Specific Plan and the General Plan and considered public testimony and made a recommendation to the City Council to adopt the proposed amendments; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted Public Hearings on March 21, 2018, and April 18, 2018, for the purpose of considering amendments to the North 101 Corridor Specific Plan and the General Plan; WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered all evidence, including testimony and the analysis and recommendations by staff, presented at said hearing; WHEREAS, notices of said public hearings were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance is intended to be carried out in a manner in full conformance with the California Coastal Act of 1976 and the Development Services Director is hereby authorized to submit this Ordinance as part of the Local Coastal Program Amendment to the California Coastal Commission for their review and adoption. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Encinitas, California, hereby ordains as follows: SECTION TWO: GENERAL PLAN. For consistency throughout the documents that include the project site, language has been added to the note found on Figure 1 Roadway Classification of the Circulation Element of the General Plan as follows: SEE EXHIBIT A NORTH 101 CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN. For consistency throughout the documents that include the project site, the following language has been added to Figure 5-C of the North 101 Corridor Specific Plan as follows: 2018-03-21 Item 10A (CC-4c PC Resolution No. 14 LCPA-GP-SPA) 4 of 9

SEE EXHIBIT B SECTION THREE: Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted this Ordinance, and each and all provisions hereof, irrespective of the fact that one or more provisions may be declared invalid. SECTION FOUR: Public Notice and Effective Date. The City Clerk is directed to prepare and have published a summary of the ordinance no less than five days prior to consideration of its adoption, and again within 15 days following adoption, indicating the votes cast. This Ordinance will become effective following certification by the California Coastal Commission as being consistent with the Local Coastal Program for the City of Encinitas and California Coastal Act. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance was introduced on March 21, 2018. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18 th day of April, 2018 by the following vote to wit: AYES: NAYS: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Catherine Blakespear, Mayor City of Encinitas ATTESTATION AND CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No. 2018-05 which has been published pursuant to law. Kathy Hollywood, City Clerk 2018-03-21 Item 10A (CC-4c PC Resolution No. 14 LCPA-GP-SPA) 5 of 9

Exhibit A 2018-03-21 Item 10A (CC-4c PC Resolution No. 14 LCPA-GP-SPA) 6 of 9

5.0 Circulation Plan Figure 5-C North Highway 101-90-Foot Proposed Right-of-Way NORTH 101 CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN Figure 5-C PAGE 5-9 2018-03-21 Item 10A (CC-4c PC Resolution No. 14 LCPA-GP-SPA) 7 of 9

Exhibit B 2018-03-21 Item 10A (CC-4c PC Resolution No. 14 LCPA-GP-SPA) 8 of 9

.. /"V, :~. Prime Arterial A six-lane roadway with a typical right-of-way width of 120-130 feet and a pavement width of 100-110 feet. The roadway is genera 11 y divided into three travel lanes in each direction by a median. Access to and from thi s roadway is restri cted..:. Prime Arterial 10' 10' 12' 12' 12' 12' 12' 12' 12' 10' 10'. " ~. :~~.0. "o'! ~. '0.,:. t,. 120"'130'R,O.W. Major Arterial 12' 12' J 12' 10' 10' 12' 12' 10' 10' 85'-:1'20' R.O.W. Collector 10' 12'. 12' 12' 12' 8' 10' Local 10' 8' Note: Variation in righl-ol-way width and specific roadway improvements will occur within each of the roadway classifications, based. on existing' corritions and other. factors. 70'. 84' R.O.W. 12' 12' 5ci-"10'R.O.W. S' 10' Major Arterial A four-l ane divided roadway with a typical right-of-way width of 85-120 feet and a pavement width of approximately 80 feet. Thi s roadway is also divided by a raised median with two travel lanes in each direction. Gollector A four-lane undivided roadway with two travel lanes in each direction. The typical right-of-way width of this category of roadway is 70-84 feet wh il e the pavement wi dth is approxi mate 1 y 64 feet. The pri mary funct i on of th is category of roadway is to di stri bute traffi c between 1 oca 1 streets and major and prime arterials. Local This category of roadway is I des i gned to provi de access to I individual parcels and to direct It ra road. ffi Local c to the streets nearest cons co i st 11 of ector two I. lanes with a typical right-of-way I wi dth of 50-70 feet and a pave- feet..1 ment wi dth of approxi matel y 40.~;qiim.iiiIII :ncinitas General Plan 3/29/89 2018-03-21 Item 10A (CC-4c PC Resolution No. 14 LCPA-GP-SPA) 9 of 9 C-17