architects LONDON KENT

Similar documents
REFERENCE: B/03745/12 Received: 02 October 2012 Accepted: 05 October 2012 WARD(S): Totteridge Expiry: 30 November 2012.

LETTER OF OBJECTION LAND TO THE SOUTH WEST OF FORGE GARAGE, HIGH STREET, PENSHURST, KENT, TN11 8BU

Ground Floor Flat 15 Redbourne Avenue London N3 2BP

1 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans:

3 Abbey View Mill Hill London NW7 4PB

37 NAGS HEAD LANE BRENTWOOD ESSEX CM14 5NL

Report Author/Case Officer: Joanne Horner Contact Details:

Ward: West Wittering. Proposal Change of use from public highway pavement to residential garden use.

REFERENCE: B/00601/12 Received: 11 February 2012 Accepted: 21 February 2012 WARD(S): High Barnet Expiry: 17 April 2012

3 Tretawn Gardens London NW7 4NP

18 Birkbeck Road London NW7 4AA. Reference: 15/02994/HSE Received: 14th May 2015 Accepted: 26th May 2015 Ward: Mill Hill Expiry 21st July 2015

2014/0590 Reg Date 26/06/2014 Chobham

Reference: 15/06961/RCU Received: 13th November 2015 Accepted: 17th November 2015 Ward: Coppetts Expiry 12th January 2016

Reference: 16/1234/HSE Received: 25th February 2016 Accepted: 2nd March 2016 Ward: High Barnet Expiry 27th April 2016

Reference: 16/1447/FUL Received: 7th March 2016 Accepted: 7th March 2016 Ward: East Finchley Expiry 2nd May 2016

Planning and Regulatory Committee 20 May Applicant Local Councillor Purpose of Report

5 Gratton Terrace London NW2 6QE. Reference: 17/5094/HSE Received: 4th August 2017 Accepted: 7th August 2017 Ward: Childs Hill Expiry 2nd October 2017

Garages To Rear Of The Willows 1025 High Road London N20 0QE

1 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans:

49 Broughton Avenue London N3 3EN

CA//17/02777/FUL. Scale 1:1,250. Planning Services Canterbury City Council Military Road Canterbury Kent CT1 1YW

Case Officer: Sarah Kay File No: CHE/14/00515/REM Tel. No: (01246) Plot No: 2/6132 Ctte Date: 15 th September 2014 ITEM 1

Development in the Green Belt

Mr & Mrs Connolly per Pump House Designs Pump House Yard The Green SEDLESCOMBE, East Sussex. TN33 0QA

Tennis Court Rear Of 3-5 Corringway London NW11 7ED

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Executive Director (Operational Services) Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities)

Land Adj. 63 Sunny Bank Road, Sutton Coldfield, Birmingham, B73 5RJ

Final Revisions: Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning.

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Planning and New Communities Director. Linton. Yes

Your ref: 1608 My ref: PA16/03150/PREAPP Date: 7 December 2016

LOCATION: 592 Finchley Road, London, NW11 7RX REFERENCE: F/03977/12 Received: 22 October 2012 Accepted: 29 November 2012 WARD(S): Childs Hill Expiry:

6B Bertram Road London NW4 3PN

PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT

26 September 2014 CONSULTATION EXPIRY : APPLICATION EXPIRY : 22 July 2014 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: PERMISSION

Final Revisions: Provision of single storey modular classroom and associated works.

Application Recommended for Approval Hapton with Park Ward

CA//16/00504/FUL. Canterbury City Council Military Road Canterbury Kent CT1 1YW. Crown copyright and database rights 2016 Ordnance Survey

Canterbury City Council Military Road Canterbury Kent CT1 1YW. Title: CA/16/02745/ADV. Author: Planning and Regeneration.

Perth and Kinross Council Development Management Committee 24 April 2013 Report of Handling by Development Quality Manager

PART 1 EAST HAMPSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL SECTION 1 SCHEDULE OF APPLICATION RECOMMENDATIONS

PLANNING COMMITTEE. 14 October 2014

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Planning and New Communities Director

Derry City and Strabane District Council Planning Committee Report

Brookside Walk Children's Play Area, London, NW4

Persimmon Homes Thames Valley Date received: 2 nd April week date(major): 2 nd July 2014 Ward: Nascot

RULE 6 (6) STATEMENT OF CASE

Perth and Kinross Council Development Management Committee 20 February 2013 Report of Handling by Development Quality Manager

UTT/17/2075/FUL - (BERDEN) (Referred to Committee by Councillor Janice Loughlin. Reason: In the Public Interest)

DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Executive Director / Head of Planning Services

UTT/17/2050/FUL - (STANSTED MOUNTFITCHET)

2015/1020 Mr Edward Cockburn Caravan storage on hardcore base (Retrospective) Ranah Stones, Whams Road, Hazlehead, Sheffield, S36 4HT

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Director of Development Services

Stanryck House, 38 Totteridge Village, London, N20 8JN

an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

Report Author/Case Officer: Paul Keen Senior Planning Officer (Dev Control) Contact Details:

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Executive Director (Operational Services)/ Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities)

2014/0943 Reg Date 06/11/2014 Lightwater

EAST OF ENGLAND OFFICE

PLANNING COMMITTEE 15 September 2015

DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUNGALOW AND REPLACEMENT BUNGALOW. Ms Sukhi Dhadwar

DESIGN GUIDANCE NOTE NO: 5 EXTENSIONS TO HOUSES

Opp The Market Place Falloden Way London NW11 6JJ

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. REPORT TO: Planning Committee 1 April 2015 Planning and New Communities Director

Derry City and Strabane District Council Planning Committee Report

REFERENCE: F/05159/13 Received: 05 November 2013 Accepted: 05 November 2013 WARD(S): Garden Suburb Expiry: 31 December 2013.

DONCASTER METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL. PLANNING COMMITTEE - 15th October Expiry Date:

Reserved Matters application for a site that straddles the boundary between CBC and BBC

Committee Date: 19/03/2015 Application Number: 2014/06414/PA Accepted: 06/01/2015 Application Type: Full Planning Target Date: 03/03/2015

Site north of Hattersley Road West (east of Fields Farm Road), Hattersley

St Barnabas C of E Primary School, Spring Lane, Erdington, Birmingham, B24 9BY

DECISION NOTICE - PERMISSION GRANTED

Planning Area Committee 25 June 2018 Addendum to Officers Report RESTRICTION OF PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS - EXTENSIONS

MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING HELD MONDAY 19 TH JANUARY PM BURBAGE MILLENNIUM HALL

Proposal: Proposed new access road. The application site is Council owned land and the decision level is at Planning and Licensing Committee.

5 Eastlake Close, Petersfield, Hants, GU31 4ES SDNP/18/01399/TPO

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Director of Development Services

Rev John Withy, Sion House, 120 Melmount Road, Sion Mills

ROYAL BOROUGH OF WINDSOR & MAIDENHEAD

3(iv)(b) TCP/11/16(29)

25 Clarry Drive, Sutton Coldfield, Birmingham, B74 2QT

Ward: Southbourne. White Croft 14 Breach Avenue Southbourne West Sussex PO10 8NB

PARISH / WARD: Peacehaven / Peacehaven East PROPOSAL:

Schedule of Planning Applications Committee Date: 23 May Reference: 06/17/0726/F Parish: Hemsby Officer: Mr J Beck Expiry Date:

DELEGATION REPORT REPORT OF THE CHIEF PLANNING OFFICER. WARD: Hyde Park & Woodhouse Application: 12/01402/FU

APP/G1630/W/15/

Test Valley Borough Council Southern Area Planning Committee 8 January 2019

Outh SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Joint Director for Planning and Economic Development S/0179/18/OL. Histon. Approval.

Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority

REFERENCE: 15/01661/FUL Registered: 16 March 2015 Expiry date: 25 October 2016

CHANGE OF USE OF AMENITY LAND TO RESIDENIAL GARDEN LAND WITH BOUNDARY FENCES

Planning Committee 04/02/2015 Schedule Item 6. Smith Farm Estate, Old Bridge Close, Northolt, UB5 6UA.

WEST AREA PLANNING SUB-COMMITTEE. Elm Park, Elm Terrace, Cricklewood Tree Preservation Order TPO/CA/419

PLANNING COMMITTEE DATE: 07/09/2015 REPORT OF THE SENIOR MANAGER PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT SERVICE CAERNARFON. Number: 4

Derry City and Strabane District Council Planning Committee Report

Harrow Lane, St Leonards-on-Sea, East Sussex, TN37 7JZ ERECTION OF 113 DWELLINGS TOGETHER WITH ESTATE ROADS (DETAILED SUBMISSION)

Site Assessment Technical Document Appendix A: Glossary

ACTION TAKEN BY CABINET MEMBER (EXECUTIVE FUNCTION) 26 September 2013

an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Planning and New Communities Director

Transcription:

DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT AND PLANNING STATEMENT architects LONDON KENT Planning Application Document Brockholt Cottage Butterwell Hill, Cowden, Kent TN8 7HB December 2015 Version 1.1

existing view 1 existing view 2 existing view 3 existing view 4 Issue Revision By Ck'd Date FOLLOW FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY DO NOT SCALE CHECK ALL LEVELS AND DIMENSIONS ON SITE REPORT ALL DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT THIS DRAWING IS SUITABLE FOR TOWN PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION COPYRIGHT - NO COPY OR REPRODUCTION IS PERMITTED WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF MILLER ARCHITECTS MILLER ARCHITECTS MEDWAY HOUSE STUDIO HIGH STREET COWDEN EDENBRIDGE, KENT TN8 7JQ Tel: 020 7193 1473 www.miller-architects.co.uk C Drawing: Job No: Drawing No: Rev: Project: Existing Views 0848 103 Brockholt Cottage, Cowden, Kent Date: Drawn: Sept 2015 Scale: NTS DRT Checked: SM

architects LONDON KENT Prepared by, Miller Architects and Associates Ltd Medway House Studio High Street Cowden Kent TN8 7JQ Architect Susanna Miller BA Arch (Hons), Dip Arch, Dip Historic Building Conservation (AA), RIBA DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT AND PLANNING STATEMENT Planning Application Document Brockholt Cottage Butterwell Hill, Cowden, Kent TN8 7HB December 2015 Version 1.1

N O R T H 0 5 10 50 100 scale (metres) site subject to application shown in red Brockholt Cottage Lavender Cottage Tylers Cottage Glover's Hawes South View Cowden Cross House The Daisy Imagery 2015 Google, Map data 2015 Google Butterwell Hill 20 m Produced under Ordnance Survey Licence Nº 1000 33083 Map data 2015 Google 20 m Butterwell Hill Cowden Edenbridge, Kent TN8 7HB MILLER ARCHITECTS MEDWAY HOUSE STUDIO HIGH STREET COWDEN EDENBRIDGE, KENT TN8 7JQ Tel: 020 7193 1473 www.miller-architects.co.uk C Drawing: Project: Location Plan Brockholt Cottage, Cowden, Kent Job No: Drawing No: Rev: Date: Drawn: 0848 100 July 2015 DRT Scale: Checked: 1:1250 @ A4 SM

Contents Location Plan... 4 Introduction... 7 Planning History... 7 Pre App Advice... 7 Existing Plans... 8 Planning Statement... 9 Use... 9 Areas... 9 Landscape... 9 Existing Elevations...10 Appearance & Design - Option 4...11 Access...11 Summary...11 Proposed Option 4 Drawings...14 Appendix 1 - SE/07/02148/FUL... 18 2-14/02591/HOUSE... 20 3 - PA/15/00785... 27 5

Introduction Brockholt Cottage forms the end of a short terrace of early twentieth century cottages, each a single-family dwelling. The owners, Mr and Mrs Edwards, contacted Miller Architects to draw up proposals enlarge the living space to accommodate their growing family. Brockholt Cottage is situated in the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and Metropolitan Green Belt on the edge of the Village of Cowden. Planning History At the earliest opportunity Miller Architects contacted Sevenoaks Planning Department to establish the existing planning history of the property. The Decision notices, drawings and Delegated Reports are in the Appendix but in summary is very brief and amounts to: 1, SE/07/02148/FUL granted 26th September 2007. The Description of Development was Erection of a two story side extension, the building was given consent to extend from 104.5 square meters to 157.7 square meters. This consent was not implemented. 2, 14/02591/HOUSE grated 17th November 2014. Description of Development was Demolish two bay brick garage and summerhouse, replace with oak frame two bay garage with storage. This consent has been implemented. Pre Application Advice The current proposal has come directly from consultation with Sevenoaks Planning Officers and the Pre App submitted to Sevenoaks Planning Department in September 2015. Hannah Western the Planning Officer came to site on the 16th October 2015 and her written letter of advice following the meeting is given in Appendix 3 along with the 3d views of the options presented at the Pre App. The Pre App PA/15/00785 response was positive for both options presented but clearly favored Scheme 2 (labeled option 4), Hannah commented on Option 4/ Scheme 2 in her Pre App response letter of the 2nd November 2015: the setting down of the ridge of the host property and back from the front elevation assists in creating a subservient addition to the row of terraces, and the retention of the current length of the ridge assists In ensuring the proposed terrace does not harm the balance of these terraces. 7

0 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 10 scale (metres) kitchen study bathroom bedroom 2 cup'd wc landing hall living room bedroom 1 cup'd cup'd garage existing ground floor plan existing first floor plan existing ground and first 106.57m² 50% 53.29m² garage 40.33m² (not included) existing roof plan Issue Revision By Ck'd Date FOLLOW FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY DO NOT SCALE CHECK ALL LEVELS AND DIMENSIONS ON SITE REPORT ALL DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT THIS DRAWING IS SUITABLE FOR TOWN PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION COPYRIGHT - NO COPY OR REPRODUCTION IS PERMITTED WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF MILLER ARCHITECTS MILLER ARCHITECTS MEDWAY HOUSE STUDIO HIGH STREET COWDEN EDENBRIDGE, KENT TN8 7JQ Tel: 020 7193 1473 www.miller-architects.co.uk C Drawing: Project: Existing Plans Brockholt Cottage, Cowden, Kent Job No: Drawing No: Rev: Date: Drawn: 0848 101 May 2015 Scale: 1:100 @ A3 DRT Checked: SM

Planning Statement The site constraints are: Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty: High Weald Area of Special Control of Advertisement Metropolitan Green Belt The Policies that relate to this site are: Sevenoaks District Plan EN1, H14B and VP1 Sevenoaks District Core Strategy SP1 Residential Extension Supplementary Planning Document National Planning Policy Framework. Allocations and Development Management Document (emerging) SC1, EN1, EN2, GB3. Use The use as a single-family dwelling is not intended to change. Areas As well as obtaining as much of the Planning History and drawings as possible Miller Architects have done their own dimensional survey of the building. This has been used to calculate the as built size of the building and to reconcile this will the consented planning drawings. The existing building area (excluding the garage) is 106.57 square meters. The Garage area is 40.33 square meters, it is not included in the area for the house as it is more than 5 meters from the house. The proposed area increase of the house equates to a proposed 52.24 m 2 or 49% increase over the 1947 plan size. Landscape The existing hard standing to the front is not intended to change. The proposals are designed so as to involve as little loss of garden as possible. No trees will be affected. 9

0 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 10 scale (metres) existing front elevation existing side elevation existing rear elevation Issue Revision By Ck'd Date FOLLOW FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY DO NOT SCALE CHECK ALL LEVELS AND DIMENSIONS ON SITE REPORT ALL DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT THIS DRAWING IS SUITABLE FOR TOWN PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION COPYRIGHT - NO COPY OR REPRODUCTION IS PERMITTED WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF MILLER ARCHITECTS MILLER ARCHITECTS MEDWAY HOUSE STUDIO HIGH STREET COWDEN EDENBRIDGE, KENT TN8 7JQ Tel: 020 7193 1473 www.miller-architects.co.uk C Drawing: Project: Existing Elevations Brockholt Cottage, Cowden, Kent Job No: Drawing No: Rev: Date: Drawn: 0848 102 May 2015 Scale: 1:100 @ A3 DRT Checked: SM

Appearance and Design In developing the design particular attention has been paid to the NPPF, and Sevenoaks District Local Plan and the SPG on Residential Extensions. The existing building is a charming example of a Kentish cottage terrace. Set in a short terrace of cottages built at the same time. The existing three cottages have been much added to and altered over the years by successive owners, this has lead to an unbalanced and an asymmetrical principle elevation. The proposal seeks to address this asymmetry, both in stylistic and height and bulk terms but also the use of the existing palette of materials. One of the aspects of the existing house that we have tried to address is that the existing front door is set in to the side of the main elevating and is modestly scaled. The proposal seeks to give the front door more architectural definition and legibility within the architecture of the front façade. The side extension has been set back and stepped away from the front façade and designed to be subservient to and to compliment the existing building. The proposals have been architecturally matched to form part of an harmonious overall composition both in design and use of existing materials. A butterfly roof has been introduced over the proposed extension to reduce the proposed roof height and to bring it closer to the heights of the roof to the other end of the terrace, again trying to bring some sense of overall composition to the group of buildings as a whole. Access Access generally will be improved with the repositioning of the front door and level access wherever possible across the design. Summary The proposed extension has been carefully designed to compliment the existing buildings, the existing street scene, the rural agricultural nature of the existing building and to respect the openness of the Green Belt. Miller Architects and Mr and Mrs Edwards have been careful to consult with Sevenoaks Planners and to work cooperatively in developing the proposals in line with their advice. 11

proposed view 1 proposed view 2 proposed view 3 proposed view 4 Issue Revision By Ck'd Date FOLLOW FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY DO NOT SCALE CHECK ALL LEVELS AND DIMENSIONS ON SITE REPORT ALL DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT THIS DRAWING IS SUITABLE FOR TOWN PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION COPYRIGHT - NO COPY OR REPRODUCTION IS PERMITTED WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF MILLER ARCHITECTS MILLER ARCHITECTS MEDWAY HOUSE STUDIO HIGH STREET COWDEN EDENBRIDGE, KENT TN8 7JQ Tel: 020 7193 1473 www.miller-architects.co.uk C Drawing: Job No: Drawing No: Rev: Project: Proposed Views - Option 4 0848 211 a Brockholt Cottage, Cowden, Kent Date: Drawn: Sept 2015 Scale: NTS DRT Checked: SM

As Proposed Option 4 13

0 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 10 scale (metres) bathroom bedroom 2 kitchen wc landing living room hall R/L bedroom 3 (vaulted ceiling) R/L bedroom 1 cup'd cup'd porch garage (replaced existing garage and summerhouse) proposed ground floor plan proposed first floor plan existing ground and first 106.57m² 50% 53.29m² garage 40.33m² (not included) proposed 52.24m² 49% increase proposed roof plan Issue Revision By Ck'd Date FOLLOW FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY DO NOT SCALE CHECK ALL LEVELS AND DIMENSIONS ON SITE REPORT ALL DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT THIS DRAWING IS SUITABLE FOR TOWN PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION COPYRIGHT - NO COPY OR REPRODUCTION IS PERMITTED WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF MILLER ARCHITECTS MILLER ARCHITECTS MEDWAY HOUSE STUDIO HIGH STREET COWDEN EDENBRIDGE, KENT TN8 7JQ Tel: 020 7193 1473 www.miller-architects.co.uk C Drawing: Project: Proposed Plans - Option 4 Brockholt Cottage, Cowden, Kent Job No: Drawing No: Rev: Date: Drawn: 0848 208 a May 2015 Scale: 1:100 @ A3 DRT Checked: SM

0 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 10 scale (metres) proposed front elevation proposed side elevation proposed rear elevation Issue Revision By Ck'd Date FOLLOW FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY DO NOT SCALE CHECK ALL LEVELS AND DIMENSIONS ON SITE REPORT ALL DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT THIS DRAWING IS SUITABLE FOR TOWN PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION COPYRIGHT - NO COPY OR REPRODUCTION IS PERMITTED WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF MILLER ARCHITECTS MILLER ARCHITECTS MEDWAY HOUSE STUDIO HIGH STREET COWDEN EDENBRIDGE, KENT TN8 7JQ Tel: 020 7193 1473 www.miller-architects.co.uk C Drawing: Project: Proposed Elevations - Option 4 Brockholt Cottage, Cowden, Kent Job No: Drawing No: Rev: Date: Drawn: 0848 209 a May 2015 Scale: 1:100 @ A3 DRT Checked: SM

Appendix 17

Appendix 1 - SE/07/02148/FUL

19

Appendix 2 - SE/07/02148/FUL Please note all details requiring submission to and approval by this Council should be forwarded to this office notwithstanding that final discharge of the condition may involve consultation with other agencies/authorities. If you have any query regarding the conditions you should contact the case officer, Helen Broughton, in the first instance for advice on the above direct phone number. Mr Tom Edwards C/O Crown Oak Buildings Ltd 3 Gabriels Farm Marsh Green Edenbridge Kent TN8 5PP Direct Dial: Ask For: My Ref: Your Ref: Date: 01732 227000, Option 3 Helen Broughton SE/14/02591/HOUSE MISS VICKI BAREHAM 17 November 2014 Yours faithfully Dear Sir/Madam Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Site : Development : Brockholt Cottage Butterwell Hill Cowden KENT TN8 7HB Demolish 2 bay brick garage and summerhouse, replace with oak frame 2 bay garage and storage. Please find attached the formal notice of Decision being granted for the above development. Your attention is drawn to the fact that this permission is granted subject to conditions. Please familiarise yourself with the conditions and ensure the specific requirements are met. If you are acting on behalf of a client please ensure you draw their attention to the conditions and advise of their implications. The development, once started, will be monitored by my enforcement staff. Failure to comply with a condition could result in the Council taking steps to secure compliance and may in certain circumstances affect the legality of any works carried out. This is especially important when a condition has been imposed requiring submission and approval of details prior to commencement of works on site, since failure to comply with such a condition can lead to the permission being void. In appropriate cases the Council will consider the expediency of serving a Temporary Stop Notice. You should also be aware that the applicant has the right to appeal against a condition within 6 months of the date of this Notice. 14/02591/HOUSE Page 1 of 5 14/02591/HOUSE Page 2 of 5

4) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: Site Plan, Block Plan, Drawings entitles COBTESUM, COBEDW, COB0684, received 27.08.14 and 22.09.14. For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning. Mr Tom Edwards C/O Crown Oak Buildings Ltd 3 Gabriels Farm Marsh Green Edenbridge Kent TN8 5PP SE/14/02591/HOUSE Valid on 22nd September 2014 TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE) (ENGLAND) ORDER 2010 Site : Development : GRANT OF PLANNING PERMISSION Brockholt Cottage Butterwell Hill Cowden KENT TN8 7HB Demolish 2 bay brick garage and summerhouse, replace with oak frame 2 bay garage and storage. Sevenoaks District Council, as the District Planning Authority, pursuant to powers in the above mentioned Act and Order, HEREBY GRANTS PLANNING PERMISSION for the development described above, to be carried out in accordance with the application and plans submitted therewith, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS set out below :- 1) The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission. In pursuance of section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2) The materials to be used in the construction of the development shall be those indicated on the approved plan as detailed on the application form. To ensure that the appearance of the development enhances the character and appearance of the locality as supported by Policy EN1 of the Sevenoaks District Local Plan. 3) Within one month of the commencement of development, the garage and summerhouse which are detailed upon the submitted Block Plan shall be demolished and all resulting materials removed from the site in their entirety. To prevent inappropriate development within the Metropolitan Green Belt. Note to Applicant DATED THIS: 17th day of November 2014 In accordance with paragraphs 186 and 187 of the NPPF Sevenoaks District Council (SDC) takes a positive and proactive approach to development proposals. SDC works with applicants/agents in a positive and proactive manner, by; Offering a duty officer service to provide initial planning advice, Providing a pre-application advice service, When appropriate, updating applicants/agents of any small scale issues that may arise in the processing of their application, Where possible and appropriate suggesting solutions to secure a successful outcome, Allowing applicants to keep up to date with their application and viewing all consultees comments on line (www.sevenoaks.gov.uk/environment/planning/planning_services_online/654.asp), By providing a regular forum for planning agents, Working in line with the NPPF to encourage developments that improve the improve the economic, social and environmental conditions of the area, Providing easy on line access to planning policies and guidance, and Encouraging them to seek professional advice whenever appropriate In this instance the applicant/agent: 1) Was provided with pre-application advice. 2) The application was dealt with/approved without delay. 14/02591/HOUSE Page 5 of 5 14/02591/HOUSE Page 3 of 5 Please remove any site notice that was displayed on the site pursuant to the application. 14/02591/HOUSE Page 4 of 5 21

23

Recommendation Report Reference: 14/02591/HOUSE Date: 17.11.14 Subject: Appraisal Name: Helen Broughton Address: Brockholt Cottage, Butterwell Hill, Cowden, Kent, TN8 7HB Description of proposal Demolish 2 bay brick garage and summerhouse, replace with oak frame 2 bay garage and storage. Description of site The site consists of Brockholt Cottage which is located within the rural locality of Cowden. The site is located within the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and the Metropolitan Green Belt. Proposal The proposal seeks to demolish the existing garage and summer house (cumulatively, these exhibit a gross floor area of 43.24 square metres. A two bay garage and store is proposed as part of the application which will exhibit a gross floor area of 40.3 square metres. Constraints Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Area of Special Control of Advertisement Metropolitan Green Belt High Weald Policies Sevenoaks District Local Plan EN1, H14B, VP1 Sevenoaks District Core Strategy SP1 Residential Extensions Supplementary Planning Document National Planning Policy Framework The NPPF places the emphasis on weight which should be given to emerging plans under paragraph 216. In terms of the Council s Allocations and Development Management Plan, such is in the final states of preparation and therefore its policies should be given due weight. Allocations and Development Management Document (emerging) SC1, EN1, EN2, GB3 Relevant Planning History 07/02148/FUL Erection of two storey side extension as amended by plans received 19/09/07 (granted 26.09.07) None Parish Council Cowden Parish Council Members of the Planning Committee of Cowden Parish Council have recently considered the planning application referenced above. Members resolved to support the application. However, Members considered the height of the proposed garage to be excessive and expressed concern that the proposed garage protrudes in front of the sight line of the house. Other Representations None received Publicity Expires 26.10.14 Appraisal Principal Issues National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) The NPPF (with regards to green belts) states that the primary purpose of the Green Belt is to keep land open to check unrestricted sprawl and to safeguard the countryside from encroachment. The document states that there is a general presumption against inappropriate development, where the openness of the countryside/landscape would be adversely affected. Inappropriate development is, by definition, harmful to the Green Belt. It is for the applicant to show why planning permission should be granted. Very special circumstances to justify inappropriate development will not exist unless the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations. Paragraph 89 of the NPPF sets out what is considered to be appropriate development. This paragraph highlights that the replacement of buildings, provided that the new buildings are in same use and not materially larger than those to which they would replace, is acceptable. On this basis, the principle of replacing the existing garage and summerhouse is considered to be acceptable in terms of the guidance outlined within the NPPF. Policy H14B of the Sevenoaks District Local Plan In respect of the proposed development, the application site is not located within the built urban confines (as identified on the proposals map within the Sevenoaks District Local Plan), and as such policy H14B of the Sevenoaks District Local Plan applies. The proposal is located within the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. Policy H14B of the Sevenoaks District Local Plan details that [p]roposals for the erection of buildings and enclosures within the residential curtilages of dwellings within Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, but outside the confines of any town or village, as shown on the Proposals map, must not conflict with Green Belt Policy and must comply with [additional] criteria.

In terms of the proposed development, such seeks a replacement outbuilding within a similar location to the summerhouse which is to be demolished as part of the application. The outbuildings which are to be demolished cumulatively exhibit a gross floor area of 43.24 square metres; the replacement outbuilding exhibits a gross floor area of 40.3 square metres. As such, there will be a decrease in gross floor area at the application site of 2.94 square metres at the application site by means of the proposed development. In terms of the height of the replacement garage, it is acknowledged that the replacement outbuilding will exhibit a higher roof profile than that of the existing outbuilding (representing an increase in 1.42 metres in overall height; the eaves height however (at 2.2 metres) will remain lower than that exhibited by the existing garage which measures between 2.06 metres and 2.56 metres by virtue of the sloping flat roof). The difference in height is considered to be modest and is in part due to the design of the proposed garaging which in terms of its scale and bulk, while main modest as the garage exhibits a large area of catslide roof to the rear elevation helps to reduce the scale of the development. Thus, the replacement outbuilding will remain well designed in relation to the existing dwelling and compatible with the character of the area. In conclusion, as the siting will remain the same as the existing garage, it is not considered that the replacement outbuilding will have a far greater impact upon the visual amenities of the locality than that of the existing situation exhibited. Whilst the proposed replacement will be relocated, it s new position provides greater space immediately adjacent to the house, which in this instance helps in the openness of the Green Belt. In terms of the guidance outlined within the NPPF, given the fact that the proposed outbuilding will result in a decrease in the overall gross floor area at the application site and that the increase in height will be modest to the roof area by virtue of the design, the development is considered to result in a replacement building which would not be materially larger than those to which the development would replace. On this basis, the replacement outbuilding proposed is considered to be acceptable. Impact upon the street scene The proposed garage will be located closer to the street scene than that of the existing outbuildings. However, there is no established building line exhibited along Butterwell Hill with other properties exhibiting garages within the front garden areas. In terms of the site itself, the proposed garage will be located 4 metres from the back of the public highway and will be screened from view by vegetation and soft landscaping. The storage portion of the garage will be located to the west (adjacent to Butterwell Hill) further minimising the impact of the garage within the street scene. On this basis, the proposed development is considered to be acceptable. Impact upon the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Policy LO8 of the Sevenoaks District Core Strategy states that the countryside and the distinctive features that contribute to the special character of its landscape and its biodiversity will be protected and enhanced where possible. The distinctive character of the Kent Downs and High Weald Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty and their settings, will be conserved and enhanced. The Residential Extensions Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) additionally states that the prime consideration of applications within Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty relates to the conservation of the natural beauty of these designated landscape areas. As previously discussed within this report, the proposed development is considered to be of such a scale and bulk which would be comparable with the existing dwelling and would not appear unduly prominent within the landscape. As such, the proposed development is considered to be in accordance with policy LO8 of the Sevenoaks District Core Strategy. Impact upon residential amenity Policy EN1 of Sevenoaks District Local Plan details that proposals should not have an adverse impact upon the privacy or amenities of a locality by reason of form, scale or height. Policy EN2 of the emerging Allocations and Development Management Plan states that proposals will only be permitted where they would safeguard the amenities of occupiers of nearby properties by ensuring that the development would not result in excessive noise, odour, activity or vehicle movements, overlooking or visual intrusion and that the built form would not significantly adversely prejudice outlook, privacy, or light enjoyed by the occupiers of nearby properties. Given the nature of the development, and the distance of the proposal from neighbouring properties, such is not considered to have any detrimental impact upon the levels of amenity which are currently enjoyed by the residents at neighbouring properties. Other considerations Parish representation The matters which have been raised within the Parish representation have been discussed previously above. Access Access arrangements will remain unchanged as part of the proposal. Conclusion For the reasons stated previously within this report, the proposed development is considered to be acceptable. It is therefore considered that planning permission be granted. Recommendation 25

Grant of planning permission subject to conditions Signed: Case Officer: Date: Helen Broughton 17.11.14 Signed: Team Manager: Aaron Hill Date: 17/11/14

Appendix 3 - PA/15/00785 Whilst it is considered that the extension of the ridge would be harmful, it is considered that this harm would not amount to a reason for refusal, and it is my informal opinion that this design would be considered acceptable on design grounds. Miller Architect & Associates Ltd Medway House Studio High Street Cowden Kent TN8 7HB Dear Sir or Madam, Pre-Application Advice Enquiry Site: Brockholt Cottage, Butterwell Hill, Cowden, Kent, TN8 7HB Development: Remodelling and extension of domestic dwelling. I write further to our meeting regarding the above. Tel No: 01732 227000, Option 3 Ask for: Hannah Weston Email: planning.preapplication.advice@seve noaks.gov.uk My Ref: PA/15/00785 Date: 2/11/15 Two schemes have been provided to remodel and extend the dwelling. The application dwelling is located within the Green Belt and AONB. An assessment of the design will be made below. Please note that neighbouring amenity and green belt calculations cannot occur at this stage. Scheme 1 (labelled 3 in submission): This proposal includes the extension of the ridge to provide a side (north) extension, which will then have a barn hip to match the other end of this row of terraces. Beyond this a further side (north) extension is proposed which has a ridge set down from the ridge of the host property. Alongside this a gable end roof projection is proposed to the front (west) with porch and a new window is proposed. The proposed alterations in this scheme are similar, although not identical, to the works which have occurred to the other end of the terraces. The proposed lower side extension would be set back from the front elevation and set down from the ridge, appearing clearly subservient. The proposed gable projection would be of a similar appearance to that added to Tylers Cottage. It is considered that the extension of the ridge line harms the balance of these properties, particularly in relation to the chimneys, and it is considered that if it is intended to create a design to match the other end of the terraces, this should match exactly. Scheme 2 (labelled 4 in submission): This scheme proposed a two storey side (north) extension which is set down from the ridge of the property and back from the front elevation. As part of this scheme the front door would be moved to the front (west) with a porch. A new window is also proposed on the western elevation. The setting of the extension down from the ridge of the host property and back from the front elevation assists in creating a subservient addition to the row of terraces, and the retention of the current length of the ridge assists in ensuring the proposed extension does not harm the balance of these terraces. It is my informal opinion that this option would be acceptable in design terms, and would be the preferred choice out of the two options. Any advice given by council officers for pre-application enquiries does not constitute a formal response or decision of the Council with regards to future planning application. Any views or opinions expressed are given without prejudice to the consideration of any planning application, which will be subject to public consultation and statutory / nonstatutory consultations, and the formal decision of the Council. I would recommend that you research all relevant policies and guidance and consider how they apply to your proposal, before submitting any planning application. You should therefore be aware that officers cannot give guarantees about the final formal decision that will be made on your planning or related applications. However, the pre-application advice will be taken into account in the determination of the future planning related applications, subject to the proviso that circumstances and information may change or come to light that could alter the position. In addition, it should be noted that if the planning application is delayed for a significant period then any pre-application advice may be overtaken by changes in national, regional or local policy and guidance. Yours sincerely, Hannah Weston Planning Officer Development Services Sevenoaks District Council Page 2 of 2 27

proposed view 1 proposed view 2 proposed view 3 proposed view 4 Issue Revision By Ck'd Date FOLLOW FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY DO NOT SCALE CHECK ALL LEVELS AND DIMENSIONS ON SITE REPORT ALL DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT THIS DRAWING IS SUITABLE FOR TOWN PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION COPYRIGHT - NO COPY OR REPRODUCTION IS PERMITTED WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF MILLER ARCHITECTS MILLER ARCHITECTS MEDWAY HOUSE STUDIO HIGH STREET COWDEN EDENBRIDGE, KENT TN8 7JQ Tel: 020 7193 1473 www.miller-architects.co.uk C Drawing: Job No: Drawing No: Rev: Project: Proposed Views - Option 3 0848 210 Brockholt Cottage, Cowden, Kent Date: Drawn: Sept 2015 Scale: NTS DRT Checked: SM

proposed view 1 proposed view 2 proposed view 3 proposed view 4 Issue Revision By Ck'd Date FOLLOW FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY DO NOT SCALE CHECK ALL LEVELS AND DIMENSIONS ON SITE REPORT ALL DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT THIS DRAWING IS SUITABLE FOR TOWN PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION COPYRIGHT - NO COPY OR REPRODUCTION IS PERMITTED WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF MILLER ARCHITECTS MILLER ARCHITECTS MEDWAY HOUSE STUDIO HIGH STREET COWDEN EDENBRIDGE, KENT TN8 7JQ Tel: 020 7193 1473 www.miller-architects.co.uk C Drawing: Job No: Drawing No: Rev: Project: Proposed Views - Option 4 0848 211 Brockholt Cottage, Cowden, Kent Date: Drawn: Sept 2015 Scale: NTS DRT Checked: SM

architects LONDON KENT