East Malling Rootstock Club. Felicidad Fernández AHDB Tree Fruit Day 22 Feb 2018

Similar documents
Rootstock breeding and trialling at EMR. Feli Fernández

East Malling Rootstock Club Policy Group meeting 15th September 2017

East Malling Rootstock Club. Annual Report

Grower Summary TF 172. Evaluation and development of new rootstocks for apples, pears, cherries and plums. Final 2012

Membership of the East Malling Rootstock Club Project number: TF 182. Nigel Bardsley. 31 st March 2012 (extendable until 31 st March 2014)

3. M9 NIC29 A virus-free Belgian subclone of M9 that is slightly more vigorous than most others M9 clones.

Apple Rootstock Trials in British Columbia, Canada

Innovative Rootstocks for Apple crop. Nicola Dallabetta FEM (Italy) Australia November 2017

Apple Rootstocks. John Cline, University of Guelph, Horticultural Experiment Station, Simcoe

Pipfruit Varieties For Fruit Growers. 40 years and growing. Quality. Trust. Innovation

Overview of the Vineland Series Apple Rootstocks

Fire Blight-Resistant Apple Rootstocks

Breeding woolly aphid resistant dwarfing apple rootstocks (continued AP96019 and AP00007)

Welcome to Balsgård. Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU)

Propagation techniques in horticulture

In the case of intensive production systems, the objective is to use a rootstock that restricts tree vigour, induces early cropping is precocious and

High density planting systems: principles and pitfalls John Palmer HortResearch, Nelson Research Centre, Motueka, NZ

Sweet Cherry Rootstock Traits Lynn E. Long, Oregon State University

Breeding Apple Rootstocks for Modulation of Mineral Nutrients in Scions

Tim Smith; Dana Faubion and Dr. William Proebsting,

Rootstocks. Rootstocks for intensive pear production. Pear (Pyrus) rootstocks. OHF series

EVALUATION RESULTS OF FINNISH APPLE ROOTSTOCKS IN LATVIA

UPDATE ON CHERRY ROOTSTOCKS

Grafting Morphology and Physiology Text Pages:

Evaluation of grafting for the mature green tomato production system

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Research Service Washington, D.C

Pear Rootstocks. How many trees would I plant? ± 3,000 per ha. What I believe growers need to be doing to be successful in the Year 2012.

Apple Orchard Management

Nursery Tree Specifications & Tree Types Description

BREEDING of NEW APPLE CULTIVARS in BELARUS KAZLOUSKAYA ZOYA, HASHENKA T., VASEHA V., YARMOLICH S.

Evaluation of Pyrus and Quince Rootstocks for High Density Pear Orchards

Updates from the RBC Raspberry Breeding Programme

Evaluation of new low- and moderate-chill peach cultivars in coastal southern California

FINAL PROJECT REPORT Project title Organization Contact Administrator CO-PI Cooperators Introduction Objectives

EVALUATION OF SIZE CONTROLLING ROOTSTOCKS FOR CALIFORNIA PEACH, PLUM AND NECTARINE PRODUCTION

Growing Fruit: Grafting Fruit Trees in the Home Orchard

Overview of Current (Apple) Rootstock Technologies. The Geneva Apple Rootstock Breeding Team

ANNUAL REPORT TO NC DWARF APPLE ROOTSTOCK TRIAL SUMMARY FOR THE 2010 SEASON

Propagation by Grafting and Budding

2016/17 TREE FRUIT REPLANT PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

California Cling Peach Board ANNUAL REPORT-2010 IMPROVED ROOTSTOCKS FOR PEACH AND NECTARINE. Ted DeJong, Professor, University of California, Davis.

Alternatives to Rootstock Propagation by Seed What can we expect?

Rootstocks are the foundation of a healthy and productive

Peach Rootstock Trials Jim Schupp PSU-FREC

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching this

ISHS International Cherry Symposium 2013

Home Orchard Care for Master Gardeners. Jeff Schalau Associate Agent, ANR University of Arizona Cooperative Extension, Yavapai County

Peach Genetics and Breeding for the Future.

Choosing apple varieties and rootstocks for your new orchard

Pruning Fruit Trees. Vince Urbina Colorado State Forest Service

History. Citrus Breeding. Rootstock. Breeding Goals. Rootstock Hybrids. Carrizo Citrange

New Arkansas Blackberry Production Characteristics

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF AMELANCHIER SP. AND QUINCE ELINE AS ROOTSTOCKS ON 1- TO 2-YEAR-OLD EUROPEAN PEAR TREES

Geneva Rootstocks for Weak Growing Scion Cultivars Like Honeycrisp. This project was partially funded by the NY Apple Research and Development Program

Grafting and Rootstock Effects on Fruit Yield and Composition in Organic, Field-grown Tomato

Performance of Tomato Lines and Hybrids Combining Resistance to Septoria Leaf Spot and Late Blight and Tolerance to Early Blight

NOTICE TO FRUIT GROWERS AND NURSERYMEN RELATIVE TO THE NAMING AND RELEASE OF THE US-942 CITRUS ROOTSTOCK

New Plant Breeding Techniques Group 4 Others

The influence of different cherry rootstocks on sweet cherry properties

CS Walsh, JM Harshman, M Newell, A Wallis, GR Welsh and A Barton-Williams. University of Maryland College Park, MD USA

Cling Peach ANNUAL REPORT 2006 EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR TOLERANCE TO BACTERIAL CANKER AND ORCHARD REPLANT CONDITIONS.

Update on new cherry rootstock possibilities from Michigan State Univ. Amy Iezzoni Department of Horticulture Michigan State University

Rootstock Options for the southern Sac Valley. Kat Pope Orchard Advisor, Sac-Solano-Yolo Feb 3 rd, 2016

In modern apple production systems, selection of an

RECUPOM. Introductory level Quebec Apple Cultivars and Rootstocks Evaluation Project

The reconditioning of the pome fruit varietal collection at Grove, Tasmania

Establishing new trees possible impacts of rootstock propagation method on young tree growth Ute Albrecht

WALNUT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2005

Unit E: Fruit and Nut Production. Lesson 3: Growing Apples

Unit D: Fruit and Vegetable Crop Production. Lesson 4: Growing and Maintaining Tree Fruits

Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station

ROOTSTOCK EFFECTS ON COCOA IN SABAH, MALAYSIA

Modern Apple Training Systems. Terence L. Robinson Dept. of Horticultural Sciences, Cornell University Geneva, NY 14456

Apple I. Tuesday afternoon 2:00 pm

SF 041d. Janet Allen (ADAS) None. Janet Allen Harriet Roberts Chris Dyer

French Pear Rootstocks

Application 2015 ESS Award for Excellence in Multistate Research Nominating Region: Nominator:

STONE FRUIT ROOTSTOCKS

Plant and Site Selection Genetics and the Environment

Documentation of field and postharvest performance for a mature collection of quince (Cydonia oblonga) varieties in Imathia, Greece

for root traits selection

PROPAGATION AND RETESTING OF WALNUT ROOTSTOCK GENOTYPES PUTATIVELY RESISTANT TO PESTS AND DISEASES

Performance of Apple and Pear Cultivars in Northern Mississippi,

Project Title: Wooly Apple Aphid resistance in advanced rootstock selections. PI: Gennaro Fazio Co-PI: Betsy Beers

Funded Projects to Aid Growers in the HLB Battle

FRUIT TREES Selection and Site Preparation. Gary Gorremans WSU Lewis County Master Gardener

Budding and Grafting. M. Elena Garcia, PhD Horticulture Dept.

PROPAGATION AND RETESTING OF WALNUT ROOTSTOCK GENOTYPES PUTATIVELY RESISTANT TO PESTS AND DISEASES

Response of Cucurbit Rootstocks for Grafted Melon to Root-knot

Why Grow Fruit or Berries in Your Backyard?

Selection of Clonal Avocado Rootstocks in Israel for High Productivity under Different Soil Conditions

CLONAL PROPAGATION OF WALNUT ROOTSTOCK GENOTYPES FOR GENETIC IMPROVEMENT

Effect of Rootstocks on Growth and Yield of Carmen Sweet Cherry

Cherry rootstock on-going breeding program throughout the world

One Shields Avenue Madera CA Davis CA USA

Orchard Density and Canopy Design. Prepared by Ross Wilson AgFirst NZ

AVOCADO ROOTSTOCK-SCION RELATIONSHIPS: A LONG-TERM, LARGE-SCALE FIELD RESEARCH PROJECT. II. DATA COLLECTED FROM FRUIT-BEARING ORCHARDS 1

Developing new varieties

The Sun-Blotch Disease of Avocado

EXPERIMENTS WITH ETTINGER CULTIVAR GRAFTED ON CLONAL AVOCADO ROOTSTOCKS, IN ISRAEL

Transcription:

East Malling Rootstock Club Felicidad Fernández AHDB Tree Fruit Day 22 Feb 2018

EM Rootstock Club TF224 Follows on from the century-old R/S development work at EM and the breeding from the A&PBC Partnership between INN and AHDB horticulture (2008 2020)

EM Rootstock Club TF224 Current project runs 2015 2020 Objectives: Breed and select improved rootstocks for apple and pear Trial our own selections and material from other programmes It replaces and continues two previous projects: Rootstock breeding (2008 2015) TF182 On-going rootstock trials TF172a&b Works closely with AHDB- and BBSRC-funded research on apple canker

Breeding objectives Develop new dwarfing and semi-dwarfing stocks for apple & pear increased precocity and productivity improved scion-graft compatibility, in particular for pear increased fire-blight and/or woolly apple aphid resistance enhanced tolerance to replant disease enhanced tolerance to P. cactorum good nursery performance

Current breeding cycle: Choose parent(s) & Controlled crossing (Year 0) Raise seedling populations & plant out (Y1) Bud with a common scion incl. control cvs (Y2) Evaluate in the field (Y5 Y7): vigour, crop load, suckering Multiplication for replicated trials (Y8 Y10)» Evaluate susceptibility to pest and disease

Current breeding cycle: INN NIAB EMR Choose parent(s) & Controlled crossing (Year 0) Raise seedling populations & plant out (Y1) Bud with a common scion incl. control cvs (Y2) Evaluate in the field (Y5 Y7): vigour, crop load, suckering Multiplication for replicated trials (Y8 Y10): pest and disease resistance Preliminary trials (Y10 Y17): 1 scion, size, yield efficiency, fruit size Bulking up & multisite trials (Y15 Y30): nursery performance, range of scions & locations Virus indexing & mother trees (Y20 onwards) IP protection & commercial release (Y25 Y35)

Future breeding cycle? Choose parent(s) & controlled crossing (Year 0) Raise seedling populations, marker & phenotype screening and early de-selection for P&D resistance (Y1) FB (markers) WAA (markers +/- inoculation) P. cactorum (markers? PhD 2018) Multiplication for replicated preliminary trials (Y2 Y4) Propagation traits & graft compatibility Preliminary trials (Y5 Y12) larger numbers in testing: vigour, yield Bulking up & multisite trials (Y10 ) improved statistical analysis?

Trials at East Malling - Apple First stage: RF185 (planted 2012 but not promising) Second stage: EE207 (planted in 2010) VF224 (planted in 2010) SC250 (planted in 2014) Eufrin trial (planted in 2017) Trials in bold are expected to be terminated and grubbed in the next few months.

Stage 1 trial RF185 Planted 2012 Four NIAB-EMR rootstock selections : M306-6 M306-20 Woolly apple aphid susceptible M306-79 No major FB resistance M306-189 Standards MM106, M9 and M116 Royal Gala under conventional orchard management

Vigour

Yield

Yield efficiency No significant effect of rootstock on yield efficiency

New Stage 1 trial 2018 DNA verified prior to planting (ongoing) Pest and disease screening: WAA (inoculation)- 2014 2016 FB (markers) ongoing P. cactorum (2018-19) 12 14 selections will be included 6 reps available for most selections

Second stage apple trial (EE207) Planted 2010 Five NIAB-EMR rootstock selections : AR852-3 AR839-9 B24 R104 R59 Standards M27, M9 and M26 Royal Gala & Braeburn under conventional orchard management

Vigour

2017 - Yield a a ab ab ab abc ab abc ab bc c c The p-value for rootstock effect was <0.001 for both fruit weight and number No significant interaction between rootstock and scion abc bc bc c

Yield efficiency No significant effect of rootstock on yield efficiency

Cumulative Yield

Second stage apple trial (VF224) Planted 2010 Four NIAB-EMR rootstock selections : AR10-3-9 AR809-3 AR835-11 R80 Standards M116 & M106 Red Falstaff under organic orchard management

Yield and Yield efficiency 2017 a ab ab ab ab b Significant effect of rootstock on total fruit yield and total number of fruits per tree(p<0.05) No significant effect of rootstock on yield efficiency

Vigour and Cumulative Yield Significant effect of rootstock on both tree volume and girth (p<0.001)

Information from INN and partners 2-6 trials per selection (multiple sites, multiple scions) Evaluation on replant sites

INN and EUFRIN trials AR10-3-9 AR295-6 AR486-1 AR628-2 AR680-2 AR835-11 Planted 2017 Includes 6 (of 18) are EM selections Not all R/S are at all sites

Summary tables Annual report (2017-18) Trial (s) INN INN Genotype AR10-2-5 AR10-3-9 AR69-7 AR86-1-20 INN AR120-242 AR360-19 INN AR295-6 AR440-1 INN AR486-1 AR628-2 INN AR680-2 AR682-6 AR801-11 VF224 AR809-3 VF224/INN AR835-11 INN AR837-19 EE207/INN AR839-9 EE207 AR852-3 EE207 B24 EE207 R104 EE207 R59 VF224 R80 (HDC) VF224 M.116 VF224 M.M.106 EE207 M.9 EE207 M.26 EE207 M.27 Parentage Vigour Productivity WAA response FB Susceptibility M.27 x M.M.106 < M.9 < M.9 Re-test 2018 M.27 x M.M.106 > M.116 > M.116 Susceptible AR10-2-6 op Susceptible M.M.106 x M.27 ~ M.116 ~ M.116 Resistant? M.27 x M.M.106 ~ Cepiland > Cepiland Susceptible M.9 x M.27 Susceptible R.5 x Ottawa 3 ~ > M.9 Similar / > M.9 Susceptible M.25 x M.27 Susceptible? - 2018 Ottawa 3 x M.7 Susceptible Ottawa 3 x M.M.106 Test 2018 M.26 x M.27 ~10% < Cepiland > Size & > Yield Susceptible M.26 x MI.793 Resistant M.26 x M.9 Susceptible? - 2018 R.80 x M.26 Susceptible MI.793 x M.9 ~ 25% > Cepiland ~ 25% > Cepiland Test 2018 M.3 x M.1 ~ Cepiland ~ Cepiland Susceptible M.7 x M.27 ~ 50% > Cepiland Good Yield & Size Susceptible AR362-16 o.p. Test 2018 AR10-2-5 x AR86-1-22 Resistant AR134-31 x AR86-1-22 Resistant AR134-31 x AR86-1-22 Re-test 2018? Re-test 2018 M.M.106 x M.27 Resistant Northern Spy x M.1 Resistant Susceptible M.9 x M.13 High High - Canker* P. cactorum Propagation Fully susceptible Susceptible? V. susceptible (field) Intermediate-Susceptible Very high Intermediate-Susceptible Very low High Medium Intermediate-Susceptible High Fully susceptible High Fully susceptible Medium/High? Medium/High? Fully susceptible High Inconclusive Low Low/Medium? Low High? Intermediate-Susceptible Medium/High? Intermediate-Tolerant Inconclusive High? Fully susceptible Resistant? High? Medium/High? (High) Fully susceptible (High) Susceptible Fully susceptible Very poor Decision De-selected

East Malling Rootstock Club Felicidad Fernández AHDB Tree Fruit Day 22 Feb 2018