Oxford Fire Department: 2008 Service Analysis. Prepared for the Subcommittee studying the Oxford Division of Fire. April 8, 2009

Similar documents
2017 Annual Report. King County Fire District No. 27 Fall City, WA

City of Los Angeles Office of the Controller

Cedar Fire Department Run Statistics and Analysis January 1 st December 31 st, 2013

CITY OF OWENSBORO OWENSBORO FIRE DEPARTMENT DEPLOYMENT ANALYSIS

Star Fire District staridaho.org/government/firedept.php

Star Fire District staridaho.org/government/firedept.php

Mount Prospect Fire Department

RECORD KEEPING IN DISARRAY AT SAN JOSE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION

RISK & HAZARD ANALYSIS SOG

Investigation Report Worker Fatally Injured after Fall from Height November 10, 2014

BENEFITS of RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLERS:

South Lyon Fire Department 2012 Annual Report

SAN JOSE FIRE FIGHTERS

SAGINAW FIRE DEPARTMENT SAFER

Battery Performance Alert

FIRE AND RESCUE. Intent

Saying Mahalo to Solar Savings: A Billing Analysis of Solar Water Heaters in Hawaii

a high level of operational reliability), and the designer (in performing probabilistic-based

Sugarbeets Enjoy Warm Winter

SAFETY COURTESY PROFESSIONALISM EFFICIENCY

POSITION VACANCY NOTICE CITY OF KETCHIKAN

Battery Performance Alert: A TOOL FOR IMPROVED PATIENT MANAGEMENT FOR DEVICES UNDER BATTERY ADVISORY

Fairfax County Fire and Rescue. Sully District Association Briefing

Colerain Township report to. Hamilton County Regional Planning Commission. December 2, 2010, 1:00PM. t a f f r e p o r t

LAKE JOHANNA FIRE DEPARTMENT

Comparing & Validating Deviation Surveys

Services the Agency is Required to Provide Services

LA GRANGE FIRE DEPARTMENT SEPTEMBER 2017

2017 Eastside Fire & Rescue Response Coverage Report

#6) SPR DAIRY QUEEN SITE PLAN REVIEW

Chapter 2 Study Questions and Research Methods

Long-term Inventory of Fire Burned Areas and Emissions of North America s Boreal and Temperate Forests

Riverside Fire Department

Enhancing the Response Time of the Nantucket Fire Department

ATM DEVICE THEFT & ATM GAS ATTACKS:

Fire Chief s Report December 2018 November 2018 Incidents by Station

ELEVATOR RESCUE PROCEDURE

White Paper: Video/Audio Analysis Technology. hanwhasecurity.com

Application Note. Application Note for BAYEX

Completed and submitted the Fourth Quarter State Aggregate Repot for 2016.

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

FIRE PROTECTION AND EMERGENCY SERVICES BYLAW

NFPA Self Assessment Manual

LFR - Code 3 Fire Report

FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS

Baker County Volunteer Fire Department Fire Protection Assessment Update

VASHON-MAURY FIRE AND RESCUE Community Needs Survey Executive Summary March 2000

Smoke Alarm Response Time:

Watkins Glen Fire Department

Performance and Cost Data. fire services

Detection of Abandoned Objects in Crowded Environments

West Reading Police Daily Activity

Research on Decision Tree Application in Data of Fire Alarm Receipt and Disposal

Chief John C. Reese, EFO

NFIRS 5.0 Coding Questions and Answers A Reference Guide

Emergency Services Response Times

Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department Annual Report

ANALYSIS OF CALLS RESPONDED TO BY THE CITY FIRE BRIGADE ~ YEAR

Annual Report Components

AROMAS TRI-COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING NOTICE & AGENDA

UAF Police Department Emergency Communication Center USAGE AND SERVICE REPORT. December 31, 2011

Fire statistics: an overview

An Analysis of Volunteer Firefighter Injuries,

Real Time Pipeline Leak Detection on Shell s North Western Ethylene Pipeline

This is an incident action status report from the Contra Costa EMS Agency on Fire Station Closures affecting the communities of Lafayette, Martinez,

Division of Fire Safety. State of New Jersey Department of Community Affairs FIRE IN NEW JERSEY

BeST Completely Randomised Two Factor Design Demo with R Demonstration as a Case Study Factorial ANOVA and Data compilation

REQUIREMENTS. For FIRE DEPARTMENTS. State of West Virginia. Bob Wise Governor THE DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AFFAIRS AND PUBLIC SAFETY

CITY OF MOUNTAIN BROOK FIRE DEPARTMENT

Water Resources and Policy Initiatives CSU Campus Water Use Calculations Standard Operating Procedures February 26, 2016

A portion of the fire fighting personnel is continually rotated without a formal orientation regarding the unique characteristics of the island.

Can extreme selection change expression of a quantitative trait in a population in one generation?

A proposed research project submitted to the Ohio Fire Executive Program

SECTION 1 Introduction...1. SECTION 2 Regional Context Criteria for Planning Districts Description of Planning District...

Retrospective Hazard Review

Effective Alarm Management for Dynamic and Vessel Control Systems

Identification of Aberrant Railroad Wayside WILD and THD Detectors: Using Industry-wide Railroad Data. June 10, 2014

Centers for Regional Excellence. Downriver Fire Authority. Organization Committee Objective. Operations Committee Report 2007

Standard Operating Procedure Ottawa Fire Service. Major Case File Management

TESTS OF ADSIL COATING

Standard PRC-005-3(X) Protection System and Automatic Reclosing Maintenance

HALON FLIGHTLINE EXTINGUISHER EVALUATION: DATA SUPPORTING STANDARD DEVELOPMENT [INCLUDES NOVEMBER 2007 ADDENDUM]

Taking Action on Fire and Life Safety

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Recommendation Approval

Radar technology in surveillance

Model Carbon Monoxide (CO) Alarm Response Policy

2018 ANNUAL REPORT IRA TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT of FORESTRY and FIRE PROTECTION OFFICE OF THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL UL 300

inet Now Live Monitoring

Office of Energy Efficiency National Energy Use Database Energy Consumption of Major Household Appliances Marketed in Canada Trends for

MR688 Project Sample Test Report

NFIRS 5.0 CODING QUESTIONS MANUAL

Pebble Beach Community Services District Fire Department 3101 Forest Lake Road, Pebble Beach, CA

Kimberly Rollins, Professor, Department of Economics, University of Nevada, Reno

SIEMENS ULTRAMAT 6 IR CARBON MONOXIDE ANALYZER METHOD VALIDATION FOR TESTING CARBON MONOXIDE IN NITROGEN, NF

The Goals and Objectives of Project FAIL-SAFE

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BELLEVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER BEING A BY-LAW TO ESTABLISH AND REGULATE A FIRE DEPARTMENT AND EMERGENCY SERVICES

Can You Hear Me Now?

AN ANALYSIS OF THE PERFORMANCE OF RESIDENTIAL SMOKE DETECTION TECHNOLOGIES UTILIZING THE CONCEPT OF RELATIVE TIME

2013 Compliance Report RCW 52.33

Transcription:

Oxford Fire Department: 2008 Service Analysis Prepared for the Subcommittee studying the Oxford Division of Fire. April 8, 2009

Background The data are from the OFD s Firehouse database. The Firehouse database maintains current information on incident calls as well as personnel information. Only includes Jan.1 Dec. 31, 2008. This data was developed and prepared in order to answer specific questions regarding Oxford s fire and emergency medical service in 2008.

Data Limitations Descriptive quality data, not inferential. In other words is great for describing what has happened in the past, but is a poor predictor for the future and other hypothetical situations. Data appears to be reasonably accurate. However, there are small gaps and errors present in the database. In part, these gaps and errors exist because of data entry errors and omissions. These gaps are nominal in nature.

Process Exported Firehouse Data to Excel spreadsheets Converted files and put data into ArcMap 9.3 (GIS). Geocoded address responses. Developed relational database. Exported that database to SPSS for statistical analysis.

Major Variables Included in Data Jurisdiction Townships, Oxford, & Miami U. Response Time Alarm time Arrival time (minutes) Distance Straight line from OFD Emergency Type based on classification used by OFD (modified MVA s as a separate type). Shift Two 12-hour shifts changing at 7am and 7 pm.

Outline and Purpose In the last meeting there were several requests for more information about the nature of out current services. The following areas of inquiry will be treated in this presentation: Overall Response Times and Geography Calls by political jurisdiction Calls by Miami University Response time differential between Volunteers and Part-time Staff

Summary Data All Reponses EMS responses represent the lion s share of workload. EMS responses accounted for a full two-thirds (66%) of all responses. 93% of all Fire and EMS responses were within Oxford and Oxford Township. 97% of all Fire and EMS responses were within a 5-mile radius of the Fire Station. Mean response time for 2008 was 8.30 minutes (from alarm to arrival on scene).

All Responses by Type Emergency Type Valid Fire Explosion EMS Hazardous Condition Service Call Good Intent Call False Alarm Motor Vehicle Accident Total Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent 85 3.9 3.9 3.9 9.4.4 4.3 1460 66.6 66.6 70.9 66 3.0 3.0 73.9 42 1.9 1.9 75.9 133 6.1 6.1 81.9 263 12.0 12.0 93.9 133 6.1 6.1 100.0 2191 100.0 100.0

All Responses by Type

Response by Jurisdiction Township Valid 0 Oxford Milford Reily Hanover Wayne NA Total Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent 12.5.5.5 2041 93.2 93.2 93.7 121 5.5 5.5 99.2 5.2.2 99.5 6.3.3 99.7 2.1.1 99.8 4.2.2 100.0 2191 100.0 100.0 Oxford Township (Not including the City of Oxford) Valid Other Oxford Township Only Total Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent 2031 92.7 92.7 92.7 160 7.3 7.3 100.0 2191 100.0 100.0

Average Response Time Summary - Response Time In Minutes (excluding times entered as 0) res_time Valid N (listwise) N Range Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Variance 2047 39 1 40 8.30 4.215 17.763 2047

Response Times (minutes)

Miami Property Summary Miami Property was identified through the Butler County Auditor s records of ownership. Responses were considered on Miami University Property if the address was located on a parcel owned by Miami University or occurred with 50 feet of their property line. The 50-foot addition was include easements for sidewalks and the like. Miami Property Valid Other Miami Total Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent 1644 75.0 75.0 75.0 547 25.0 25.0 100.0 2191 100.0 100.0

Miami Comparison False Alarms Non-Miami Property - Emergency by Type Valid Fire Explosion EMS Hazardous Condition Service Call Good Intent Call False Alarm Motor Vehicle Accident Total Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent 66 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.2.2 4.3 1126 68.5 68.5 72.7 57 3.5 3.5 76.2 38 2.3 2.3 78.5 83 5.0 5.0 83.6 143 8.7 8.7 92.3 127 7.7 7.7 100.0 1644 100.0 100.0 Miami Property - Emergency by Type Valid Fire Explosion EMS Hazardous Condition Service Call Good Intent Call False Alarm Motor Vehicle Accident Total Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent 19 3.5 3.5 3.5 5.9.9 4.4 334 61.1 61.1 65.4 9 1.6 1.6 67.1 4.7.7 67.8 50 9.1 9.1 77.0 120 21.9 21.9 98.9 6 1.1 1.1 100.0 547 100.0 100.0

Comparison between Shifts Compares two months and response times based on shifts. Shift 1 are the hours between 7 am and 7 pm. Shift 2 are the hours between 7 pm and 7 am. It compares February and December. In February there were no part-time staff on station. Starting in August, part-time staff were hired.

Case Processing Summary February res_time Shift2 1 2 Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent 89 100.0% 0.0% 89 100.0% 82 100.0% 0.0% 82 100.0%

February Shift Comparison Descriptives res_time Shift2 1 Mean 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound Upper Bound Statistic 9.02 8.11 9.93 2 Median Variance Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum Range Interquartile Range Mean 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound Upper Bound 8.80 8.00 18.613 4.314 2 22 20 5 9.38 8.43 10.32 Median Variance Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum Range Interquartile Range 9.00 18.510 4.302 0 22 22 5

Case Processing Summary December res_time Shift2 1 2 Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent 82 100.0% 0.0% 82 100.0% 96 100.0% 0.0% 96 100.0%

December Shift Comparison Descriptives res_time Shift2 1 Mean 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound Upper Bound Statistic 5.54 4.85 6.22 2 Median Variance Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum Range Interquartile Range Mean 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound Upper Bound 5.00 9.709 3.116 1 15 14 3 8.59 7.64 9.55 Median Variance Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum Range Interquartile Range 8.00 22.096 4.701 0 26 26 6

Conclusions Overall Response times appear very reasonable given the large coverage area. However, the descriptive statistical comparison between part-time and volunteer response times are significant. Miami University, no matter how the data is parsed, is a significant consumer of resources. Miami is also a significant source of false alarms. Mean response time for 1 st Shift (comparing February and December) improved by nearly 3 minutes and 30 seconds.