PAST & CURRENT PLANNING IN ANCHORAGE

Similar documents
program strategies OVERVIEW

8implementation. strategies

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

TEMPLE MEDICAL & EDUCATION DISTRICT

Corridor Vision. 1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project. Mission of Hennepin County Community Works Program

S A C R A M E N T O C O U N T Y JACKSON HIGHWAY & GRANT LINE EAST VISIONING STUDY

The transportation system in a community is an

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

DISCUSSION TOPIC: ST JOHNS RIVER & ITS TRIBUTARIES (BPII) 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICES AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

Downtown Dubuque...it s a great time.

Planning Districts INTRODUCTION

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Assembly Amendments to Anchorage 2040 Land Use Plan Adopted on September 26, 2017

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

Preliminary Plan Framework: Vision and Goals

City of Nogales General Plan

A BLUEPRINT FOR BROCKTON A CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Economy Vision Statements: Social Wellbeing Vision Statements: Natural Environment Vision Statements:

Downtown Whitby Action Plan

REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER

2040 LUP is a part of the Comprehensive Plan and carries the same legal authority. Economic Challenges

Plan-It Greenville (2009) Comprehensive Plan 5-Year Update

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 5H

DOMINION BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN A MODEL FOR CHESAPEAKE S FUTURE

CHAPTER 7: VISION AND ACTION STATEMENTS. Noble 2025 Vision Statement

Keyport. Vision for Keyport

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

Chapter 1: Introduction

THE POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR WALKABLE COMMUNITIES. Community Technical Assistance Program Building Active Communities Institute March 2016

Northwest Rail Corridor and US 36 BRT Development Oriented Transit Analysis 4.4 STATION AREA FINDINGS

Pedestrian and Bike Bridge LOGO

SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

1 Welcome! UBC Okanagan Master Plan Update - Open House

CHARLES PUTMAN CHARLES PUTMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC

IMPLEMENTING SOMERSET COUNTY S INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK

Route 1 Corridor Study

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

COBOURG Cobourg Heritage Advisory Committee. Alison Torrie Lapaire Planner I - Heritage

Potential Green Infrastructure Strategies May 6, 2015 Workshop

Comprehensive Plan ADOPTED APRIL 2014

Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

Cumberland Region Tomorrow is a private, non-profit, citizen based regional organization working with Greater Nashville Regional Council

HOT SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OUTLINE

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

DRAFT PLAN PRESENTATION

The Vision. Photo provided by The Minervini Group. 46 Vision, Objectives & Strategies

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

Town of Oakville Streetscape Strategy

WATERFORD Plan of Preservation, Conservation and Development Supplement Part 1 - Policy Element

SHIP CREEK FRAMEWORK PLAN INTRODUCTION

The Trinity River Corridor, offering Dallas areas of natural

Plan Overview. Manhattan Area 2035 Reflections and Progress. Chapter 1: Introduction. Background

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

4- PA - LD - LIVELY DOWNTOWN. LD - Background

CITY OF COLWICH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE LAND USE 1

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION. introduction

Goals AND Guiding principles

7Page 1 CLEMMONS COMMUNITY COMPASS 1 PLAN OVERVIEW

The Five Components of the McLoughlin Area Plan

VILLAGE & TOWN OF BERGEN: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Introduction and Overview

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

Tonight s Agenda. Summary Presentation Open House. Group Discussion Next Steps: online community wide survey

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

About Momentum Midland

Somers Point Master Plan

Welcome. Comprehensive Plan & Transportation Plan Open House November 7, 2012

1INTRODUCTION. Purpose of the Truckee Railyard Master Plan

Whitemarsh Comprehensive Plan Update: Housing & Land Use. Public Workshop #3: September 20, 2018

The Land Use Plan Map is: 2006 Draft Land Use Plan Map. A key part of the Comprehensive Plan. A guide for future growth, land use decisions

Anatomy of A Vibrant Downtown. Anatomy of a Vibrant Downtown

1 October Dear Citizens of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County,

Robbinsdale LRT Station. CDI Development Guidelines. August Overview

Gary & Regional Investment Project. October 27, Creating Tomorrow Today Comprehensive Regional Plan - NIRPC

PARKS AND RECREATION

ROBBINSDALE LRT STATION CDI DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

A larger version of this map is located on the last page of this PDF.

University of the District of Columbia Van Ness Campus Master Plan Community Open House 3. December 8, 2010

Lynn Waterfront Master Plan

CITY OF UNION CITY MINUTES GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE

implementation10 Village of Greendale Comprehensive Plan: Greendale, Wisconsin. Revisiting a Greenbelt Community

Hockessin Community Redevelopment Plan

CHAPTER 8 ISSUES, CONCERNS, CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES

Status Report: MD 355 Project

Prepared for the Citizens of Forsyth County by the City-County Planning Board

Warren County/Bowling Green Focus 2030 Comprehensive Plan VOLUME 1 INDEX

4-Town Comprehensive Plan DRAFT 7/30/07

NO: R035 COUNCIL DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 2014

12.2 CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT

THE 355/270 CORRIDOR:

10 Implementation. Implementation. Responsibility for Implementation. Blueprint for Bloomsburg. Town of Bloomsburg Comprehensive Plan 10-1

Riverwalk Dreams compiled by Thomas P. Healy November 16, 2017

HERITAGE ACTION PLAN. Towards a renewed Heritage Conservation Program. What is the Heritage Action Plan? Key areas of work. A Collaborative Approach

CHUGIAK-EAGLE RIVER SITE-SPECIFIC LAND USE PLAN

6. Consistency with Local Plans

South Central Connecticut Region Plan of Conservation & Development 2018 Update. Municipal Planners

Municipal Development Plan 2013

Transcription:

CHAPTER IV: PAST & CURRENT PLANNING IN ANCHORAGE PAST & CURRENT PLANNING IN ANCHORAGE The Municipality of Anchorage conducts many programs that govern its current and longterm planning, yet what do these programs say about historic preservation? Do they identify historic resources in the Downtown, Fairview, Government Hill, and South Addition neighborhoods? Aside from the Historic Preservation Project Fund created by the Anchorage Municipal Code, are other resources in place for historic preservation? This chapter reviews how current and past Municipal plans address historic preservation in the Four Original Neighborhoods of Anchorage. All these plans are or will become part of the Anchorage Comprehensive Plan as outlined in Title 21 of the Anchorage Municipal Code (Section 21.05.30, described above). Fourth Avenue Theatre, 1947 & 2008. AO 201312 55

HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN FOR ANCHORAGE S FOUR ORIGINAL NEIGHBORHOODS Ancoae Ancoae ol Copeensive Plan In 191 the Municipality of Anchorage drafted its rst comprehensive plan to create a vision and development plan for Anchorage. Adopted on February 20, 2001, the Anchorage 2020: Anchorage Bowl Comprehensive Plan (called Anchorage 2020) is the city s fourth comprehensive plan covering the Anchorage Bowl area. The purpose of the plan is to: 1. Establish a process among elected ocials, municipal sta, and interested citiens to create a 20-year plan for land-use policy; 2. Communicate that policy to property owners, developers, elected and appointed ocials, and other interested parties; and 3. Guide elected and appointed ocials as they deliberate community development issues. More specically, the plan directs future growth in the Anchorage Bowl area and provides recommendations regarding the protection of natural areas and open space in relation to development. Relevant Policies The Municipality has been working towards the Urban Transition Scenario set forth in Anchorage 2020 (discussed in detail in Chapter VI of the HPP). Anchorage 2020 includes many provisions relevant to historic preservation, but most important is Policy 51, which directs the Municipality to prioritie historic preservation. Polic Te nicialit sall ene Ancoaes istoic ilins an sites an evelo a consevation state Many other policies related to land use, urban design, oning, density, housing aordability, open space, arts and culture, and education indirectly overlap with historic preservation goals. This HPP will support all these policies to help realie Anchorage 2020. For a complete list of Anchorage 2020 policies that are relevant to historic preservation in the Four Original Neighborhoods, see Appendix G Ancoae Relevant Policies 56 AO 2013012

CHAPTER IV: PAST & CURRENT PLANNING IN ANCHORAGE Ipleentation Stateies Anchorage 2020 identies strategies that are essential to the implementation of the land-use and design policies described above. Most relevant to the HPP are the strategies identied to implement Policy #51: nctional Plan Histoic Pesevation Plan Study of and recommendations for the city s future preservation needs Neioood o istict Plans Detailed plans or studies for dened geographic area Consevation Easeents Property rights are sold to a third-party conservator to protect the building evelopent RitsPcase Property owner sells development rights to a government agency evelopent RitsTanse Property owners buy development rights from another property owner or sell them to others Other strategies relevant to the Four Original Neighborhoods include Heritage Land Bank activities and decisions; Inll, Redevelopment, and Reinvestment Incentives to spur economic development; and Overlay ones to create special oning districts with regulatory incentives or restrictions. These historic preservation-related implementation strategies are fully dened in Appendix H Ancoae Relevant Ipleentation Stateies Ancoae Plannin Pinciples Also applicable to the Historic Preservation Plan for Anchorage s Four Original Neighborhoods are the Anchorage 2020 Planning Principles, which are intended to direct future public and private development in order to achieve the plan vision. Anchorage 2020 includes two sets of Planning Principles: Design and Environment, and Public Facilities and Services. These principles articulate a desire to preserve the identity and vitality of neighborhoods in Anchorage as well as a balanced and diverse supply of housing options. ANCHORAGE PLANNING PRINCIPLES OR ESIGN AN ENVIRONMENT Encourage architectural design that is responsive to the northern climate and seasonal light conditions. Adopt design standards that are suited to a northern urban environment to help revitalie streetscapes. Design and landscape roads to maintain and enhance the attractiveness of neighborhoods, open space, and commercial corridors and centers, and to reduce adverse impacts on neighborhoods. Promote community connectivity with safe, convenient, year-round auto and nonauto travel routes within and between neighborhoods, and to neighborhood commercial centers and public facilities. Link subdivision design with a sense of place to highlight connections to Anchorage s coastal setting, watersheds, mountains, wildlife, and subarctic forest and vegetation. Conserve Anchorage s heritage of historic buildings and sites. Protect Anchorage s scenic views. AO 201312 57

HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN FOR ANCHORAGE S FOUR ORIGINAL NEIGHBORHOODS ANCHORAGE PLANNING PRINCIPLES OR PULIC ACILITIES AN SERVICES Use public infrastructure to help revitalie or renew aging neighborhoods. Improve maintenance, landscaping, and snow removal for streets, bus stops, sidewalks, bike lanes, trails, paved paths; and associated landscaping. Promote Downtown as the center for commerce, nance, government, arts, and culture. The plan also identies the need for well-planned development that incorporates the uniue northern setting of the city and year-round public transportation respective of Anchorage s natural and built environments. The sidebars in this section highlight selected planning principles that are most relevant to historic preservation, and will be supported by the HPP. The full list of Planning Principles for Design and Environment and for Public Facilities and Services are located in Appendix I Ancoae Relevant Plannin Pinciples of this report. 58 AO 2013012

CHAPTER IV: PAST & CURRENT PLANNING IN ANCHORAGE Ancoae onton Copeensive Plan The Municipality developed and approved the Anchorage Downtown Comprehensive Plan (ADCP) in 2007 to guide the future development of the central business district. This eort was one of the implementation strategies suggested in Anchorage 2020. The ADCP focuses on land-use policy and implementation in the Downtown neighborhood. Specically, the ADCP responds to three policies identied in Anchorage 2020: #18: Strengthen the role of the CBD [Central Business District] as the regional center for commerce, services, nance, arts and culture, government oces, and medium- to highdensity residential development. #19: Locate municipal, state, and federal administrative oces in the CBD. #: Downtown is a designated major employment center. The ADCP established the overarching goal of creating a Downtown for All. Additional goals of the ADCP include the creation of more housing Downtown, development incentives, improved transportation connectivity, activation of the ground oor of businesses, and creation of a sensible regulatory framework. The goals of the HPP will support this vision for Downtown Anchorage. Additionally, 14 of Downtown s most prominent historic resources were identied as assets to the neighborhood in the Existing Conditions Analysis completed during the early stages of the ADCP planning process. This is good news for historic preservation. Continued support and community-wide recognition of these 14 historic buildings were reiterated through the HPP public comment process. See Appendix : onton Copeensive Plan: Existin Conditions Analsis for a full list. The Anchorage Downtown Comprehensive Plan (2007) established the goal of creating a Downtown for All. AO 201312 59

O N M M L K Captain Cook Hotel I State Courthouse Marriott Hotel H Delaney Park Conoco Phillips G Performing Arts Center City Hall New Convention Center (underway) F F Hilton Hotel Egan Center Kimballs Town Square Atwood Building E Weekend Market 5th Avenue Mall D Nordstrom's C Quyana Park Federal Building Federal Building B B Museum of History and Art A Fire Station BARROW DENALI Sheraton Memorial Cemetery EAGLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN FOR ANCHORAGE S FOUR ORIGINAL NEIGHBORHOODS n.14 Legend Knik Arm n.7 Downtown Study Area Downtown Core Area h.2 Park/Open Space "Notable" Building Footprint h.4 2ND CHRISTENSEN 3RD 4TH 5TH 6TH 7TH 8TH 9TH 10TH n.3 n.3 n.5 n.8 h.1 n.2 h.3 n.9 h.5 n.6 n.12 n.1 n.10 n.11 Historic and Cultural Resources Diagram Historic and cultural resources were identified in the Anchorage Downtown Comprehensive Plan (2007). 1ST 2ND CORDOVA CORDOVA DENALI n.4 n.13 EAGLE Relevant Polic Oectives The Land Use and Economic Development section of the ADCP recommended many strategies for Downtown historic preservation to be undertaken by the Anchorage Historic Preservation Commission. The HPP will support the ADCP historic preservation issues and strategies, outlined as follows on page 68 of the ADCP: Downtown Anchorage features a rich and diverse collection of signicant historic and cultural sites that has increasingly become a major focal point of attraction for both Alaskan residents and outof-state visitors. This section recommends the development of an overarching historic preservation strategy specically for Downtownto identify historic resources, issues and opportunities, and create a framework of historic preservation policies, guidelines and strategies for Downtown. The general policy objectives for this eort would be to: Promote public awareness of Downtown s historic resources and their value for the future of Downtown and the overall community; Promote consideration of historic resources in planning and development decisions by the public and private sectors; Promote strategic partnerships to further the interests of historic preservation; and Leverage historic resources as cultural and economic development assets for the future growth and vitality of Downtown. 18 See Appendix : onton Copeensive Plan: Relevant Polic Oectives for a discussion of additional policies that overlap the vision and goals of the HPP. 60 AO 2013012

CHAPTER IV: PAST & CURRENT PLANNING IN ANCHORAGE Recoended Actions and Poas To implement these policy objectives, the ADCP recommended the consideration of a historic overlay one in Downtown to help dene key historic areas as well as to serve as a cultural anchor to preserve and celebrate Downtown s heritage and uniue sense of place. It was anticipated that an overlay one would provide a focus area for incentives, programs, and development guidelines related to historic preservation. In addition to the creation of such a one, the ADCP identied other potential actions or programs, such as: Maintaining an inventory of historic resources; Recommending procedures to identify and designate historic resources; Providing nancial incentives such as grants, tax relief, loans, and/or loan guarantees; Furnishing information to historic property owners on methods of maintaining and rehabilitating, and the like; Developing guidelines for historic preservation, and identifying appropriate oning and development provisions applicable to historic properties; and/or Expanding public information and interpretive programs and activities. 19 Many of these strategies are expanded on in later chapters of this HPP and could be applied across the Four Original Neighborhoods. AO 201312 61

HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN FOR ANCHORAGE S FOUR ORIGINAL NEIGHBORHOODS Ote Plans & ocents GOVERNMENT HILL NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN Concepts discussed in the Historic Preservation Plan for Anchorage s Four Original Neighborhoods especially those related to uality-of-life issues, design standards and guidelines, transportation and infrastructure, and Municipality-owned buildings also overlap with policies and regulations established in other municipal planning documents. The policies and implementation strategies in the HPP will need to be coordinated with these other documents to eectively achieve the Municipality s preservation goals. AeaSpeciic Plans Public Review Draft PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT AUGUST 10, 2012 Government Hill Neighborhood Plan (2012). Govenent Hill Neioood Plan 1 The Government Hill Neighborhood Plan (GHNP) is currently being prepared by the Municipality of Anchorage. The purpose of the plan is to identify those assets and values important to the community and to celebrate the area s heritage as the rst neighborhood in the city. Like the Historic Preservation Plan for Anchorage s Four Original Neighborhoods, the GHNP is a mitigation measure for indirect eects identied during the Section 106 consultation process for the nik Arm Crossing Project. The Municipality of Anchorage has held a series of public workshops and design charrettes to begin preparing the GHNP, which is scheduled for completion in December 2012. For more information about the GHNP, visit: http://www.anchorageghnp.com/ghnp/home.html. aivie Conit Plan 9 After the adoption of Anchorage 2020 enabled the creation of ocial Neighborhood Plans, members of the Fairview Community Council prepared a draft community plan for their neighborhood. The Fairview Community Plan documented the history of the area, identied common values and goals, and advocated that the neighborhood be revitalied through a variety of action strategies. A Revised Final Draft was published in 2009; the draft currently awaits formal adoption in the Municipal Assembly. For more information about the draft Fairview Neighborhood Plan, visit: http://www. communitycouncils.org/servlet/content/644.html. Fairview Community Plan (2009). 62 AO 2013012

CHAPTER IV: PAST & CURRENT PLANNING IN ANCHORAGE Sip Cee Maste Plans The Municipality of Anchorage has been working for many years to plan for Ship Creek s future, starting with the Ship Creek/aterfront Land Use Plan (adopted in 1991 as part of the Anchorage Comprehensive Plan). In 1998, the Alaska Railroad and the Municipality of Anchorage initiated a 20-year master planning eort at Ship Creek that would redevelop the area into an intermodal transit hub. The Ship Creek Master Plan examines potential uses such as housing, hotels, retail, restaurants, trails and recreation, arts and crafts, transportation facilities, and a railroad museum. The plan also focuses on public access, transportation, environmental uality, area-based land use, and historical restoration. The Municipality will initiate an update to the 1998 plan in early 2013. The Alaska Railroad has since been working to complete upgrades to its facilities and infrastructure and to prepare design guidelines to shape future development. The renovation of its historic freight shed Alaska s rst historic building certied under the U.S. Green Building Council s Leadership Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) program is a key project for the revitaliation of Ship Creek. Completed in 2011, this project is intended to catalye the vision of Ship Creek as a community commerce center and to create a market atmosphere akin to Vancouver s Granville Island or Seattle s Pike Place Market. 20 Anchorage Bicycle Plan (2010). Functional Plans The Municipality and other agencies have prepared a number of functional plans to address specic concepts and/or property types. The following plans are applicable to the Four Original Neighborhoods and may overlap with the concepts discussed in the HPP: Envionental ualit Anchorage etlands Management Plan (1995, update currently in progress) Pas Geenelts and Receational Facilities Anchorage Bicycle Plan (2010) Anchorage Pedestrian Plan (2007) Anchorage Bowl Park, Natural Resource, and Recreation Facility Plan (2006) Anchorage Area-ide Trails Plan (1997, update currently in progress) AO 201312 63

HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN FOR ANCHORAGE S FOUR ORIGINAL NEIGHBORHOODS Steets and Hias 2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (2011-12, currently undergoing Assembly adoption process) Strategy for Developing Context Sensitive Transportation Projects (2008) Ocial Streets and Highways Plan (2005) Street and Highway Landscape Plan (1981) Facilities Manaeent Anchorage School District Capital Improvements Master Plan (2011) Regional Port of Anchorage Master Plan (1999) oint Base Elmendorf-Richardson Facilities Master Plan 2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (2012). Econoic evelopent Live.ork.Play. 2025 Initiative (2011, prepared by Anchorage Economic Development Corporation) Anchorage Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (2009-2013) Included as an element of the Anchorage Comprehensive Plan (AMC 21.05.030). Tanspotation Poects The planning of two transportation projects is currently under way. Both could aect the historic character of the Four Original Neighborhoods: nik Arm Crossing (AC), a bridge across the nik Arm connecting the Matanuska-Susitna Borough and Anchorage, and Highway to Highway (H2H), which would connect the Seward and Glenn Highways. Although these projects are not addressed directly in this document, the HPP can be used as a tool to inuence the design and planning of these and other transportation projects. For those interested in managing the eects of these and other similar projects, please read Captes VI and VII of the HPP to gain a clear understanding of the eectiveness of public participation. More information is available online: http://www.knikarmbridge.com/. 64 AO 2013012